Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-2jptb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-28T15:14:08.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Climate Change and Oil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2019

Edited by
Judith van Erp ,
Michael Faure ,
André Nollkaemper  and
Niels Philipsen
Judith van Erp
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Michael Faure
Affiliation:
Universiteit Maastricht, Netherlands
André Nollkaemper
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Niels Philipsen
Affiliation:
Universiteit Maastricht, Netherlands
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Smart Mixes for Transboundary Environmental Harm , pp. 237 - 326
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abbott, K. W. 2014. ‘Strengthening the Transnational Regime Complex for Climate Change’. Transnational Environmental Law 3(1), 57–88.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W. & Sindal, D. 2009. ‘The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and the Shadow of the State’. In Mattli, W. & Woods, N. (eds.), The Politics of Global Regulation. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 44–88.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W., Levi‐Faur, D. & Snidal, D. 2017. ‘Theorizing Regulatory Intermediaries: The RIT Model’. The Annals, American Academy of Political and Social Science 670(1), 14–35. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2925411 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2925411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayling, J. 2017. ‘A Contest for Legitimacy: The Divestment Movement and the Fossil Fuel Industry’. Law & Policy 39(4), 349–371.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., Pattberg, Ph. & Zelli, F. (eds.). 2012. Global Climate Governance Beyond 2012: Architecture, Agency and Adaptation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bloor, M., Datta, R., Gilinsky, Y. & Horlick-Jones, T. 2006. ‘Unicorn among the Cedars: On the Possibility of Effective “Smart Regulation” of the Globalized Shipping Industry’. Social and Legal Studies 15(4), 534–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodansky, D. 2016. ‘Climate Change: Transnational Legal Order or Disorder’. In Halliday, T. & Shaffer, G. (eds.), Transnational Legal Orders. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bouteligier, S. 2011. ‘Exploring the Agency of Global Environmental Consultancy Firms in Earth System Governance’. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 11(1), 43–61.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. 2011. ‘The Essence of Responsive Regulation’, University of British Columbia Law Review 44(3), 475–520.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. & Drahos, P. 2000. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bulkeley, H. et al. 2014. Transnational Climate Change Governance. New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burris, S., Drahos, P. & Shearing, C. 2005. ‘Nodal Governance’. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 30, 30–58.Google Scholar
Cain, M. E. 1983. ‘The General Practice Lawyer and the Client: Towards a Radical Conception’. In Dingwall, R. & Lewis, P. S. C. (eds.), The Sociology of the Professions: Lawyers, Doctors and Others. London, MacMillan Press, 106–130.Google Scholar
Danish Ministry of Economic and Business Affairs, The Netherlands Regulatory Reform Group & The United Kingdom Better Regulation Executive. 2010. Smart Regulation. A Cleaner, Fairer and More Competitive EU, published jointly by the Ministry for Economic and Business Affairs (Denmark) the Regulatory Reform Group (the Netherlands) and the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (UK).Google Scholar
Dellas, E., Pattberg, Ph. & Betsill, M. 2011. ‘Agency in Earth System Governance: Refining a Research Agenda’. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 11(1), 85–98.Google Scholar
Divest-Invest Philanthropy, Doing Good: Performing Better, 2015, available at: www.divestinvest.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/2017-DIP-Briefing-Case-Studies.pdf.Google Scholar
Drahos, P. 2017. ‘Regulatory Globalisation’. In Drahos, P. (ed.), Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications. Canberra, ANU Press, 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, M. & Sikkink, K. 1998. ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’. International Organization 52(4), 887–917.Google Scholar
Fuchs, D., ‘Governance by Discourse’, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, Honolulu, March 2005.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. 1973. ‘The Strength of Weak Ties’. American Journal of Sociology 78(6), 1360–1380.Google Scholar
Green, J. 2014. Rethinking Private Authority: Agents and Entrepreneurs in Global Environmental Governance. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gunningham, N. 2017. ‘Building Norms from the Grassroots Up: Divestment, Expressive Politics and Climate Change’. Law & Policy 39(4), 305–428.Google Scholar
Gunningham, N. & Sinclair, D. 2002. Leaders and Laggards: Next Generation Environmental Regulation. Sheffield, Greenleaf Press.Google Scholar
Gunningham, N., Grabosky, P. N. & Sinclair, D. 1998. Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gunningham, N., Kagan, R. A. & Thornton, D. 2003. Shades of Green: Business, Regulation and Environment. Stanford, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, J. et al. 2008. ‘Target Atmospheric CO2: Where Should Humanity Aim?’. Open Atmospheric Science Journal 2(1), 217–231.Google Scholar
Keck, M. E. & Sikkink, K. 1999. ‘Transnational Advocacy Networks in International and Regional Politics’. International Social Science Journal 51(159), 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, R. O. & Victor, D. G. 2011. ‘The Regime Complex for Climate Change’, Perspectives on Politics 9(1), 7–23.Google Scholar
Leese, W. 2005. ‘Smart Regulation and Risk Management’. A paper prepared at the request of the Bureau du Conseil Privé/Privy Council Office Comité Consultatif Externe sur la Réglementation Intelligente (CCERI) External Advisory Committee on Smart Regulation (EACSR) Ottawa, Canada, Government of Canada.Google Scholar
MacLeod, M. & Park, J. 2011. ‘Financial Activism and Global Climate Change: The Rise of Investor-driven Governance Networks’. Global Environmental Politics 11(2), 54–74.Google Scholar
March, J. & Olsen, J. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York, Free Press.Google Scholar
McKibben, B. 2012. ‘Global Warming’s Terrifying New Math’. Rolling Stone, 19 July 2012, available at: www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/global-warmings-terrifying-new-math-20120719.Google Scholar
Meckling, J., Kelsey, N., Biber, E. & Zysman, J. 2015. ‘Winning Coalitions for Climate Policy’. Science 349(6253), 1170–1171.Google Scholar
Oreskes, N. & Conway, E. M. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York, Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. 2009. ‘A Polycentric Approach for Coping with Climate Change’. In Bierbaum, R. M., Fay, M. & Ross-Larson, B. (eds.), World Development Report 2010: Development in a Changing Climate. Washington, DC, World Bank Group, 34.Google Scholar
Pattberg, Ph. & Stripple, J. 2008. ‘Beyond the Public and Private Divide: Remapping Transnational Climate Governance in the 21st Century’. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 8(4), 367–388.Google Scholar
Raustiala, K. & Victor, D. G. 2004. ‘The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources’. International Organization 58(2), 277–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, S. 2010. Global Norms, American Sponsorship and the Emerging Patterns of World Politics. Basingstoke, Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Sikkink, K., 2005. ‘Patterns of Dynamic Multilevel Governance and the Insider-outsider Coalition’. In Della Porta, D. & Tarrow, S. G. (eds.), Transnational Protest and Global Activism. Lanham, MD, Rowman & Littlefield, 151–174.Google Scholar
Suchman, M. C. 1995. ‘Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches’. The Academy of Management Review 20(3), 571–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. 1996. ‘Social Norms and Social Roles’. Columbia Law Review 96(4), 903–968.Google Scholar
Tollefson, C., Gale, F. & Haley, D. 2008. Setting the Standard: Certification, Governance, and the Forest Stewardship Council. Vancouver, BC, University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
UNEP, UN Environment Programme. October 2015. The Financial System We Need: Aligning the Financial System with Sustainable Development. Available at: http://web.unep.org/inquiry.Google Scholar
Vandenbergh, M. P. & Gilligan, J. M. 2015. ‘Beyond Gridlock’. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 40(2), 217–303.Google Scholar
Vaughn, A., ‘Fossil Fuel Divestment: A Brief History’, The Guardian, 2014, available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/oct/08/fossil-fuel-divestment-a-brief-history.Google Scholar
Wood, St., Abbott, K. W., Black, J., Eberlein, B. & Meidinger, E. 2015. ‘The Interactive Dynamics of Transnational Business Governance: A Challenge for Transnational Legal Theory’. Transnational Legal Theory 6(2), 333–369.Google Scholar
Wood, S. & Johannson, L. 2008. ‘Six Principles for Integrating Non-Governmental Environmental Standards into Smart Regulation’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 46, 345–395.Google Scholar

References

Bogojević, S. 2013. Emissions Trading Schemes, Markets, States and Law. Oxford/Portland Oregon, Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Cole, D. H. 2016. ‘Origins of Emissions Trading in Theory and Early Practice’, in Weishaar, S.E. (ed.), Research Handbook on Emissions Trading. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, pp. 9–26.Google Scholar
Dales, J. 2002. Pollution, Property and Prices. An Essay in Policy-making and Economics. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar (first published 1968).Google Scholar
Dudek, D. J. and Palmisano, J. 1988. ‘Emissions Trading: Why is this Thoroughbred Hobbled?’. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 13, 217–256.Google Scholar
Ebbesson, J. 2011. ‘Public Participation and Privatisation in Environmental Matters’. Erasmus Law Review 4(2), 71–89.Google Scholar
Economic Commission for Europe. 2004. Meeting of the Parties to the Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, Report of the First Meeting of the Parties Decision I/7, ECE/MP.PP/2/Add.8.Google Scholar
Etemire, U. 2013. ‘Book review: The Aarhus Convention at Ten: Interactions and Tensions between Conventional International Law and EU Environmental Law, edited by Marc Pallemaerts, 2011’. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 22(3), 371–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etemire, U. 2012. ‘Public Access to Environmental Information Held by Private Companies’. Environmental Law Review 14(1), 7–25.Google Scholar
European Environmental Agency. 2016. Application of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme Directive – Analysis of National Responses under Article 21 of the EU ETS Directive in 2015. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Fleurke, F. and Verschuuren, J. 2016. ‘Enforcing the European Emissions Trading System within the EU Member States. A Procrustean Bed?’. In White, R., Spapens, T. & Huisman, W. (eds.), Environmental Crime in Transnational Context: Global Issues in Green Enforcement and Criminology. Abingdon, Routledge Publishing, (Green Criminology), pp. 208–230.Google Scholar
Fisher, E. 2010. ‘Transparency and Administrative Law: A Critical Evaluation’. Current Legal Problems 63(1), 272–314.Google Scholar
Gunningham, N., Grabosky, P. & Sinclair, D. 1998. Smart Regulation Designing Environmental Policy. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krämer, L. 2011. EU Environmental Law. London, Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Levin, I., Hammer, S., Eichelmann, E. and Vogel, F. R. 2011. ‘Verification of Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions: The Prospect of Atmospheric Monitoring in Polluted Areas’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 369(1943), 1906–1924.Google Scholar
Livingston, P., Lee, C. S. J. and Nguyen, D. 2015. ‘Creation and Third-party Verification of Large Governmental Greenhouse Gas Emission Report’. Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment 34(3), 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, M. 2016. ‘The Current State of the Right to Access to Environmental Information’. Master thesis, European Law School.Google Scholar
Peeters, M. 2009. ‘Improving Citizen Responsibility in the North and its Consequences for the South: Voluntary Carbon Offsets and Government Involvement’. In Richardson, B. J., Le Bouthillier, Y., McLeod-Kilmurray, H. and Wood, S. (eds.), Climate Law and Developing Countries. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, pp. 337–362.Google Scholar
Peeters, M. 2016a. ‘An EU Law Perspective on the Paris Agreement: Will the EU Consider Strengthening its Mitigation Effort?’. Climate Law 6(1–2), 182–195.Google Scholar
Peeters, M. 2016b. ‘Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading in the EU’. In Farber, D. A. and Peeters, M. (eds.), Climate Change Law. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, pp. 377–385.Google Scholar
Romppanen, S. 2015. ‘New Governance in Context Evaluating the EU Biofuels Regime’. Dissertation, Publications of the University of Eastern Finland. Available at: http://epublications.uef.fi/pub/urn_isbn_978–952-61–1763-8/urn_isbn_978–952-61–1763-8.pdf.Google Scholar
Schomerus, T. and Bünger, D. 2011. ‘Private Bodies as Public Authorities under International, European, English and German Environmental Information Laws’. Journal for Environmental and Planning Law 8(1), 62–81.Google Scholar
Stewart, Richard B. 2007. ‘Instrument Choice’. In Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J. and Hey, E. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law.Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 147–181.Google Scholar
Thurlings, T. 2017. Verhandelbare emissierechten in broeikasgassen. Deventer, Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Tietenberg, T. 2006. Emissions Trading: Principles and Practice. Washington DC, RFF Press.Google Scholar
Weishaar, S. E. (ed.). 2016. Research Handbook on Emissions Trading. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Wang, J., Jin, S., Bai, W. and Jin, Y. 2016. ‘Comparative Analysis of the International Carbon Verification Policies and Systems’. Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards 84(1), 381–397.Google Scholar
De Witte, B. 2017. ‘EU Law: Is it International Law?’. In Barnard, C. and Peers, St. (eds.), European Union Law. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 177–197.Google Scholar

References

Becker, G. S. 1983. ‘A Theory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence’. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 98, 371–400.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. A. 2006. ‘Oil Pollution Prevention and Enforcement Measures and their Effectiveness: A Survey of the Empirical Research from the US’. In Faure, M. G. and Hu, J. (eds.), Prevention and Compensation of Marine Pollution Damage: Recent Developments in Europe, China and the US. Alphen aan den Rijn, Kluwer Law International, pp. 25–39.Google Scholar
Doud, A. L. 1973. ‘Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage: Further Comment of the Civil Liability and Compensation Fund Conventions’. Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce 4(4), 525–542.Google Scholar
Faure, M. G. 2016a. ‘Compulsory Liability Insurance: Economic Perspectives’. In Fenyves, A., Kissling, C., Perner, S. and Rubin, D. (eds.), Compulsory Liability Insurance from an Economic Perspective. Vienna, De Gruyter, pp. 319–341.Google Scholar
Faure, M. G. 2016b. ‘In the Aftermath of the Disaster: Liability and Compensation Mechanisms as Tools to Reduce Disaster Risks’. Stanford Journal of International Law 52(1), 95–178.Google Scholar
Faure, M. G. and Wang, H. 2006. ‘Economic Analysis of Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage’. Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce 37(2), 179–217.Google Scholar
Faure, M. G. and Wang, H. 2008. ‘Financial Caps for Oil Pollution Damage: A Historical Mistake?’. Marine Policy 32(4), 592–606.Google Scholar
Faure, M., Liu, J. and Philipsen, N. 2015. ‘Liability for Terrorism-Related Risks under International Law’. In Bergkamp, L., Faure, M. G., Hinteregger, M. and Philipsen, N. (eds.), Civil Liability in Europe for Terrorism-Related Risk. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–55.Google Scholar
Faure, M., Liu, J. and Wang, H. 2015. ‘A Multilayered Approach to Cover Damage Caused by Offshore Facilities’. Virginia Environmental Law Journal 33, 356–422.Google Scholar
Force, R., Davies, M. & Force, J. S. 2011. ‘Deepwater Horizon: Removal Costs, Civil Damages, Crimes, Civil Penalties, and State Remedies in Oil Spill Cases’. Tulane Law Review 85(4), 889–982.Google Scholar
Gold, E. 1985. Handbook on Marine Pollution. Norway, Assuranceforeningen Gard.Google Scholar
Han, L. and Wang, D. 2010. ‘Discussion on Limitation of Liability and Compulsory Insurance of Compensation for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage from Ships in China’. In Faure, M. G., Han, L. and Shan, H. (eds.), Maritime Pollution Liability and Policy. China, Europe and the US. Alphen aan den Rijn, Wolters Kluwer, pp. 145–158.Google Scholar
Hendrickx, R. 2007. ‘Maritime Oil Pollution: An Empirical Analysis’. In Faure, M. & Verheij, A. (eds.), Shifts in Compensation for Environmental Damage. Vienna, Springer, pp. 256–257.Google Scholar
IMO. 2003. ‘Better deal for oil pollution victims as IMO adopts third tier of compensation’. IMO News (3), 7–8. Available at: www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/MaritimeNewsMagazine/Documents/2003/IMONews_Issue2.pdf.Google Scholar
ITOPF – International Oil Tanker Owners Pollution Federation Limited. January 2018. Oil Tanker Spill Statistics 2017, pp. 1–15. Available at: www.itopf.org/fileadmin/data/Photos/Statistics/Oil_Spill_Stats_2017_web.pdf.Google Scholar
Jacobsson, S. 2003. ‘The International Compensation Regime 25 Years on’. In IOPC Funds’ 25 Years of Compensating Victims of Oil Pollution Incidents. London, IOPC Funds, pp. 22–32.Google Scholar
Loureiro, M. L. and Alló, M. May 2017. ‘The Economics of Oil Spills’. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science (online publication). pp. 1–32. Available at: environmentalscience.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.001.0001/acrefore-9780199389414-e-501.Google Scholar
Shan, H. 2010. ‘The Era after the Bunker Convention: Is the Gap in China’s Regime for Compensating Victims of Vessel-source Oil Spills Filled?’. In Faure, M. G., Han, L. and Shan, H. (eds.), Maritime Pollution Liability and Policy. China, Europe and the US. Alphen aan den Rijn, Wolters Kluwer, pp. 123–143.Google Scholar
Shavell, S. 1987. Economic Analysis of Accident Law. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, H. 2007. ‘Shifts in Governance in the International Regime of Marine Oil Pollution Compensation: A Legal History Perspective’. In Faure, M. and Verheij, A. (eds.), Shifts in Compensation for Environmental Damage. Vienna, Springer, pp. 197–241.Google Scholar
Wang, H. 2011. Civil Liability for Marine Oil Pollution Damage. A Comparative and Economic Study of the International, US and Chinese Compensation Regime. Alphen aan den Rijn, Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Wang, H. and Faure, M. 2010. ‘Civil Liability and Compensation for Marine Pollution – Methods to be Learned for Offshore Oil Spills’. Oil, Gas & Energy Law Intelligence 8(3), 1–27.Google Scholar
Wood, L. D. 1975. ‘An Integrated International and Domestic Approach to Civil Liability for Vessel-source Oil Pollution’. Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce 7 , 1–68.Google Scholar

References

Ansell, C. 2000. ‘The Networked Polity: Regional Development in Western Europe’. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 13(3), 303–333.Google Scholar
Arts, B. J. M. & Van Tatenhove, J. P. M. 2006. ‘Political Modernisation’. In Arts, B. & Leroy, P. (eds.), Institutional Dynamics in Environmental Governance. Dordrecht, Springer, 21–43.Google Scholar
Beck, U. 2005. Power in the Global Age: A New Global Political Economy. Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Blaauw, R. 2013. ‘Oil and Gas Development and Opportunities in the Arctic Ocean’. In Berkman, P. A. & Vylegzhanin, A. N. (eds.), Environmental Security in the Arctic Ocean. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Dordrecht, Springer, 175–184.Google Scholar
Carter, C. & Smith, A. 2008. ‘Revitalizing Public Policy Approaches to the EU: “Territorial Institutionalism”, Fisheries and Wine’. Journal of European Public Policy 15, 263–281.Google Scholar
Casper, K. N. 2009. ‘Oil and Gas Development in the Arctic: Softening of Ice Demands Hardening of International Law’. Natural Resources Journal 49(3/4), 825–882.Google Scholar
Castells, M. 2009. Communication Power. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Castells, M. 1996. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Volume I, The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford UK/Malden USA, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chhotray, V. & Stoker, G. 2009. Governance Theory and Practice. A Cross-Disciplinary Approach. New York, Palgrave/Macmillan.Google Scholar
Curran, G. 2017. ‘Social License, Corporate Social Responsibility and Coal Seam Gas: Framing the New Political Dynamics of Contestation’. Energy Policy 101, 427–435.Google Scholar
Hall, N., Lacey, J., Carr-Cornish, S. & Dowd, A. M. 2015. ‘Social License to Operate: Understanding how a Concept has been Translated into Practice in Energy Industries’. Journal of Cleaner Production 86, 301–310.Google Scholar
Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D. & Perraton, J. 2000. Global Transformations. Politics, Economics and Culture. Cambridge, Polity.Google Scholar
Henry, L. A., Nisten-Haarala, S., Tulaeva, S. & Tysiachniouk, M. 2016. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and the Oil Industry in the Russian Arctic: Global Norms and Neo-Paternalism’. Europe and Asia Studies 68(8), 1340–1368.Google Scholar
Hossain, K., Koivurova, T. & Zojer, G. 2014. ‘Understanding Risks Associated with Offshore Hydrocarbon Development’. In Tedsen, E., Cavalieri, S. & Kraemer, R. A. (eds.), Arctic Marine Governance. Opportunities for Transatlantic Cooperation. Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London, Springer, 159–176.Google Scholar
Joyce, S. & Thomson, I. 2000. ‘Earning a Social License to Operate: Social Acceptability and Resource Development in Latin America’. Canadian Mining and Metallurgical Bulletin 93(1037), 49–53.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O. 1995. ‘“Hobbes” dilemma and institutional change in world politics: sovereignty in international society’. In Holm, H. H. & Sorensen, G. (eds.), Whose World Order?. Boulder, Westview Press, 165–186.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O. & Victor, D. 2011. ‘The Regime Complex for Climate Change’. Perspectives on Politics 9(1), 7–23.Google Scholar
Koivurova, T. 2013. Gaps in International Regulatory Frameworks for the Arctic Ocean’. In Berkman, P. A. & Vylegzhanin, A. N. (eds.), Environmental Security in the Arctic Ocean. Dordrecht, Springer, 139–155.Google Scholar
Morrison, J. 2014. The Social License. How to Keep Your Organization Legitimate. New York, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mossop, J. 2016. The Continental Shelf beyond 200 Nautical Miles. Rights and Responsibilities. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, K. & Van Deth, J. W. 2016. Foundations of Comparative Politics. Democracies of the Modern World, 3rd edn. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, R., Lacey, J. & Moffat, K. 2014. ‘Maintaining Legitimacy of a Contested Practice: How the Minerals Industry Understands its ‘Social License to Operate’. Resources Policy 41, 83–90.Google Scholar
Pierk, S. & Tysiachniouk, M. 2016. ‘Structures of Mobilization and Resistance: Confronting the Oil and Gas Industries in Russia’. The Extractive Industries and Society 3, 997–1009.Google Scholar
Prno, J. 2013. ‘An Analysis of Factors Leading to the Establishment of a Social License to Operate in the Mining Industry’. Resources Policy 38, 577–590.Google Scholar
Raustiala, K. & Victor, D. 2004. ‘The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources’. International Organization 58(2), 277–309.Google Scholar
Rosenau, J. N. 2006. The Study of World Politics: Globalization and Governance (Vol. 2). London/New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Rosenau, J. N. 1997. Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier; Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sassen, S. 2006. Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2011. The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity: text and annex. Montreal, UNEP. . Available at: www.cbd.int/abs/.Google Scholar
Smits, C. C. A., Van Leeuwen, J. & Van Tatenhove, J. P. M. 2017. ‘Oil and Gas Development in Greenland: A Social License to Operate, Trust and Legitimacy in Environmental Governance’. Resources Policy 53, 109–116.Google Scholar
Smits, C. C. A., Van Tatenhove, J. P. M. & Van Leeuwen, J. 2014. ‘Authority in Arctic Governance: Changing Spheres of Authority in Greenlandic Offshore Oil and Gas Developments’. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 14(4), 329–348.Google Scholar
Thomson, I. & Boutilier, R. G. 2011. Modelling and Measuring the Social License to Operate: Fruits of a Dialogue between Theory and Practice. Available at: https://socialicense.com/publications/Modelling%20and%20Measuring%20the%20SLO.pdf.Google Scholar
Tysiachniouk, M. 2016. ‘Benefit Sharing Arrangements in the Arctic: Promoting Sustainability of Indigenous Communities in Areas of Resource Extraction’, The Many Faces of Energy in the Arctic, Arctic and International Relations Series, Fall 2016, Issue 4, Seattle, WA, Jackson School of International Relations, University of Washington, Canadian Studies Center, 18–21. Available at: https://jsis.washington.edu/arctic/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2016/05/AIRS-Issue-4.pdf.Google Scholar
Tysiachniouk, M. S., Henry, L. A., Lamers, M. & Van Tatenhove, J. P. M. 2018. ‘Oil Consortia and Indigenous Peoples in Sub-Arctic Russia: Partnership for Equity in Benefit Sharing Arrangements’. Energy Research & Social Sciences 37, 140–152.Google Scholar
USGS. 2008. ‘Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal: Estimates of Undiscovered Oil and Gas North of the Arctic Circle’, U.S. Geological Survey. Available at: https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2008/3049/fs2008-3049.pdf.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, J. 2010. Who Greens the Waves? Changing Authority in the Environmental Governance of Shipping and Offshore Oil and Gas Production. Wageningen, Wageningen Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, J. & Van Tatenhove, J. P. M. 2010. ‘The Triangle of Marine Governance in the Environmental Governance of Dutch Offshore Platforms’. Marine Policy 34(3), 590–597.Google Scholar
Van Tatenhove, J. P. M. 2016. ‘The Environmental State at Sea’. Environmental Politics 25(1), 160–179.Google Scholar
Van Tatenhove, J. P. M. 2013. ‘How to Turn the Tide: Developing Legitimate Marine Governance Arrangements at the Level of the Regional Seas’. Ocean & Coastal Management 71, 296–304.Google Scholar
Van Tatenhove, J., Arts, B. & Leroy, P. (eds.). 2000. Political Modernisation and the Environment: The Renewal of Environmental Policy Arrangements. Dordrecht/Boston/London, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Van Tatenhove, J. P. M. & Goverde, H. J. M. 2002. ‘Strategies in Environmental Policy – A Historical Institutional Perspective’. In Driessen, P. P. J. & Glasbergen, P. (eds.), Greening Society. The Paradigm Shift in Dutch Environmental Politics. Dordrecht/Boston/London, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 47–63.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×