Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:39:42.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2021

Tyler Kendall  and
Valerie Fridland
Tyler Kendall
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
Valerie Fridland
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Reno
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Sociophonetics , pp. 214 - 253
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowicz, Łukasz 2007. Sociolinguistics Meets Exemplar Theory: Frequency and Recency Effects in (ing). University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 13(2): 27–37.Google Scholar
Abramson, Arthur and Lisker, Leigh 1970. Discriminability along the Voicing Continuum: Cross-Language Tests. In Hala, Bohuslav, Romportl, Milan and Janota, Přmysl (eds.), Proceedings from the 6th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Prague: Academia Publishing House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, 569–573.Google Scholar
ACL 2019. What Is the ACL and What Is Computational Linguistics? Association for Computational Linguistics. Retrieved December 2019 from www.aclweb.org/portal/what-is-cl.Google Scholar
Adank, Patti and McQueen, James M. 2007. The Effect of an Unfamiliar Regional Accent on Spoken-word Comprehension. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS): 1925–1928.Google Scholar
Adank, Patti, Evans, Bronwen G., Stuart-Smith, Jane and Scott, Sophie K. 2009. Comprehension of Familiar and Unfamiliar Native Accents Under Adverse Listening Conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 35(2): 520–529.Google ScholarPubMed
Adank, Patti, Smits, Roel and van Hout, Roeland 2004. A Comparison of Vowel Normalization Methods for Language Variation Research. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116(5): 3099–3107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif 2003. The Social Life of Cultural Value. Language & Communication 23(3–4): 231–273.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif 2004. Registers of Language. In Duranti, Alessandro (ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Oxford: Blackwell: 23–45.Google Scholar
Aitken, Adam J. 1981. The Scottish Vowel‐length Rule. In Benskin, Michael and Samuels, Margaret L. (eds.), So Meny People, Longages and Tonges. Edinburgh: Middle English Dialect Project: 131–157.Google Scholar
Alim, H. Samy, Rickford, John R. and Ball, Arnetha F. (eds.) 2016. Raciolinguistics: How Language Shapes Our Ideas About Race. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, W. Scott and Starks, Donna 2000. “No-One Sounds Like Us?” A Comparison of New Zealand and Other Southern Hemisphere Englishes. In Bell, Allan and Kuiper, Koenraad (eds.), New Zealand English. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 53–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allbritten, Rachael 2011. Sounding Southern: Phonetic Features and Dialect Perceptions, Georgetown University, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Atwood, E. Bagby 1950. “Grease and Greasy” – A Study of Geographical Variation. The University of Texas Studies in English 29: 249–260.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Babel, Molly and Johnson, Keith 2006. Global Talker Characteristics and Judgments of Gay-sounding Speech. Presented at the 35th Annual Meeting of New Ways of Analyzing Variation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Babel, Molly, McGuire, Grant, Walters, Sophia and Nicholls, Alice 2014. Novelty and Social Preference in Phonetic Accommodation. Laboratory Phonology 5(1): 123–150.Google Scholar
Baker, Adam, Archangeli, Diana and Mielke, Jeff 2011. Variability in American English s-Retraction Suggests a Solution to the Actuation Problem. Language Variation and Change 23(3): 347–374.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael (eds.), McGee, Vern W. (trans.), Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bamman, David and Smith, Noah A. 2014. Unsupervised Discovery of Biographical Structure from Text. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2: 363–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamman, David, O’Connor, Brendan and Smith, Noah A. 2013. Learning Latent Personas of Film Characters. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Sofia, Bulgaria, August 4–9: 352–361.Google Scholar
Baranowski, Maciej 2006. From Conservative to Radical: Sound Change in the Upper Class of Charleston, S.C. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 12(2): 25–38.Google Scholar
Baranowski, Maciej 2017. Class Matters: The Sociolinguistics of GOOSE and GOAT in Manchester English. Language Variation and Change 29(3): 301–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbieri, Federica 2008. Patterns of Age‐based Linguistic Variation in American English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(1): 58–88.Google Scholar
Barreda, Santiago. 2015. phonTools: Functions for phonetics in R. R package version 0.2-2.1. Retrieved June 2020 from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/phonTools/.Google Scholar
Barreda, Santiago and Nearey, Terrance M. 2018. A Regression Approach to Vowel Normalization for Missing and Unbalanced Data. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 144(1): 500–520.Google Scholar
Bauer, Matt and Parker, Frank 2008. /æ/-raising in Wisconsin English. American Speech 83(4): 403–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baugh, John 2003. Linguistic Profiling. In Makoni, Sinfree, Smitherman, Geneva, Ball, Arnetha F. and Spears, Arthur K. (eds.), Black Linguistics: Language, Society, and Politics in Africa and the Americas. New York: Routledge: 155–168.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan 2009. Enregisterment, Commodification and Historical Context; “Geordie” versus “Sheffieldish”. American Speech 84(2): 138–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Kara (ed.) 2019. The Low-Back-Merger Shift: Uniting the Canadian Vowel Shift, the California Vowel Shift, and Short Front Vowel Shifts across North America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Kara and Wong, Amy Wing-Mei 2010. The Short-a System of New York City English: An Update. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15(2): 11–20.Google Scholar
Beddor, Patrice Speeter 2009. A Coarticulatory Path to Sound Change. Language 85(4): 785–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekker, Ian and Levon, Erez 2017. The Embedded Indexical Value of /s/-fronting in Afrikaans and South African English. Linguistics 55(5): 1109–1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Alan, Jurafsky, Daniel, Fosler-Lussier, Eric, Girand, Cynthia, Gregory, Michelle and Gildea, Daniel 2003. Effects of Disfluencies, Predictability, and Utterance Position on Word Form Variation in English Conversation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 113(2): 1001–1024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, Allan 1984. Language Style as Audience Design. Language in Society 13(2): 145–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan 2001. Back in Style: Re-working Audience Design. In Eckert, Penelope and Rickford, John R. (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. New York: Cambridge University Press: 139–169.Google Scholar
Bell-Berti, Fredericka, Raphael, Lawrence, Pisoni, David and Sawusch, James 1979. Some Relationships between Speech Production and Perception. Phonetica 36(6): 373–383.Google Scholar
Benor, Sarah Bunin 2001. The Learned /t/: Phonological Variation in Orthodox Jewish English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 7(3): 1–16.Google Scholar
Benor, Sarah Bunin 2010. Ethnolinguistic Repertoire: Shifting the Analytic Focus in Language and Ethnicity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14(2): 159–183.Google Scholar
Benson, Erica J., Fox, Michael J. and Balkman, Jared 2011. The Bag That Scott Bought: The Low Vowels in Northwest Wisconsin. American Speech 86(3): 271–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, Catherine and Strange, Winifred 1992. Effects of Phonological and Phonetic Factors on Cross-Language Perception of Approximants. Journal of Phonetics 20(3): 305–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, Hywel, Coupland, Nikolas and Garrett, Peter 2005. Conceptual Accent Evaluation: Thirty Years of Accent Prejudice in the UK. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 37(1): 131–154.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette 2004. Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette 2006. A Theoretical Synopsis of Evolutionary Phonology. Theoretical Linguistics 32(2): 117–165.Google Scholar
Boberg, Charles 2011. Reshaping the Vowel System: An Index of Phonetic Innovation in Canadian English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 17(2): 21–29.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul and Weenink, David 2020. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. Retrieved June 2020 from www.praat.orgGoogle Scholar
Boser, Bernard E., Guyon, Isabelle M. and Vapnik, Vladimir N. 1992. A Training Algorithm for Optimal Margin Classifiers. COLT ’92. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, New York: ACM Press: 144–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, David 2017. Early Development of the Western Vowel System in Utah. In Fridland, Valerie, Wassink, Alicia, Kendall, Tyler and Evans, Betsy (eds.), Speech in the Western States, Volume 2: The Mountain West. Durham, NC: Duke University Press: 83–105.Google Scholar
Bradlow, Ann R. and Alexander, Jennifer A. 2007. Semantic and Phonetic Enhancements for Speech-in-Noise Recognition by Native and Non-native Listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121(4): 2339–2349.Google Scholar
Bradlow, Ann R. and Bent, Tessa 2002. The Clear Speech Effect for Non-native Listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 112(1): 272–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradlow, Ann R. and Bent, Tessa 2003. Listener Adaptation to Foreign Accented English. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona: 2881–2884.Google Scholar
Bradlow, Ann R., Pisoni, David B., Akahane-Yamada, Reiko and Tohkura, Yoh’ichi 1997. Training Japanese Listeners to Identify English /r/ and /l/. IV. Some Effects of Perceptual Learning on Speech Production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101(4): 2299–2310.Google Scholar
Bradlow, Ann R., Torretta, Gina M. and Pisoni, David B. 1996. Intelligibility of Normal Speech I: Global and Fine-grained Acoustic–Phonetic Talker Characteristics. Speech Communication 20(3): 255–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Britain, David 1991. Dialect and Space: A Geolinguistic Study of Speech Variables in the Fens, University of Essex, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Britain, David 1997a. Dialect Contact and Phonological Reallocation: “Canadian Raising” in the English Fens. Language in Society 26(1): 15–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britain, David 1997b. Dialect Contact, Focusing and Phonological Rule Complexity: The Koineisation of Fenland English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(1): 141–170.Google Scholar
Britain, David 2010a. Conceptualisations of Geographic Space in Linguistics. In Lameli, Alfred, Kehrein, Roland and Rabanus, Stefan (eds.), Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation: Language Mapping, Vol. 2. New York: Mouton de Gruyter: 69–97.Google Scholar
Britain, David 2010b. Supralocal Regional Dialect Levelling. In Llamas, Carmen and Watt, Dominic (eds.), Language and Identities. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press: 193–204.Google Scholar
Britain, David 2013. Space, Diffusion and Mobility. In Chambers, J. K. and Schilling, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell: 471–500.Google Scholar
Brumbaugh, Susan and Koops, Chris 2017. Vowel Variation in Albuquerque, New Mexico. In Fridland, Valerie, Wassink, Alicia, Kendall, Tyler and Evans, Betsy (eds.), Speech in the Western States: Volume 2: The Mountain West. Durham, NC: Duke University Press: 131–157.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary 1999. “Why Be Normal?”: Language and Identity Practices in a Community of Nerd Girls. Language in Society 28(2): 203–223.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, Bermudez, Nancy, Fung, Victor, Edwards, Lisa and Vargas, Rosalva 2007. Hella Nor Cal or Totally So Cal?: The Perceptual Dialectology of California. Journal of English Linguistics 35(4): 325–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, Clara N. 1967. Some Acoustic Parameters of Speech and Their Relationships to the Perception of Dialect Differences. TESOL Quarterly 1(3): 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butts, Carter T. 2014. sna: Tools for Social Network Analysis. R package version 2.3-2. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/sna/.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan 2000. The Phonology of the Lexicon: Evidence from Lexical Diffusion. In Barlow, Michael and Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.), Usage-based Models of Language. Stanford: CSLI: 65–85.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan 2002. Word Frequency and Context of Use in the Lexical Diffusion of Phonetically Conditioned Sound Change. Language Variation and Change 14(3): 261–290.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan 2003. Phonology and Language Use, Vol. 94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan 2006. From Usage to Grammar: The Mind’s Response to Repetition. Language 82(4): 711–733.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan 2012. Patterns of Lexical Diffusion and Articulatory Motivation for Sound Change. In Maria-Josep, Solé and Recasens, Daniel (eds.), The Initiation of Sound Change: Perception, Production, and Social Factors. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn 2005. Listener Perceptions of Sociolinguistic Variables: The Case of (ING), Stanford University, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn 2007. Accent, (ING) and the Social Logic of Listener Perceptions. American Speech 82(1): 32–64.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn 2008. I’ll be the Judge of That: Diversity in Social Perceptions of (ING). Language in Society 37(5): 637–659.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn 2009. The Nature of Sociolinguistic Perception. Language Variation and Change 21(1): 135–156.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn 2010a. Sociolinguistics and Perception. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(6): 377–389.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn 2010b. The Sociolinguistic Variant as a Carrier of Social Meaning. Language Variation and Change 22(3): 423–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn 2011. Intersecting Variables and Perceived Sexual Orientation in Men. American Speech 86(1): 52–68.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn 2012. The Implicit Association Test and Sociolinguistic Meaning. Lingua 122(7): 753–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carahaly, Lynn 2000. Listener Accuracy in Identifying the Sexual Orientation of Male and Female Speakers, Ohio State University, MA thesis.Google Scholar
Carver, Craig M. 1987. American Regional Dialects: A Word Geography. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassidy, Frederic and Hall, Joan Houston (eds.) 1985–2013. Dictionary of American Regional English (DARE), Vols. 1–6. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta J. 1973. The Interplay of Social and Linguistic Factors in Panama, Cornell University, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta J. and Sankoff, David 1974. Variable Rules: Performance as Statistical Reflection of Competence. Language 50(2): 333–355.Google Scholar
Celata, Chiara and Calamai, Silvia (eds.) 2012. Special Issue on Articulatory Techniques for Sociophonetic Research. Italian Journal of Linguistics/Rivista di Linguistica 24(1): 1–9.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. 2009. Sociolinguistic Theory, Revised ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. and Trudgill, Peter 1998. Dialectology, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, John M., Cleveland, William S., Kleiner, Beat and Tukey, Paul A 1983. Graphical Methods for Data Analysis. Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Chevrot, Jean-Pierre, Drager, Katie and Foulkes, Paul 2018. Special Issue on Sociolinguistics and Cognitive Science. TopiCS in Cognitive Science 10(4): 655–851.Google Scholar
Cheyne, William M. 1970. Stereotyped Reactions to Speakers with Scottish and English Regional Accents. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 9(1): 77–79.Google Scholar
Chládkováa, Kateřina and Hamanna, Silke 2011. High Vowels in Southern British English: /u/-fronting Does Not Result in Merger. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Hong Kong, China.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1957/2002. Syntactic Structures, 2nd ed. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1966. Cartesian Linguistics. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clark, Lynn 2018. Priming as a Motivating Factor in Sociophonetic Variation and Change. Topics in Cognitive Science 10(4): 729–744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, Sandra, Elms, Ford and Youssef, Amani 1995. The Third Dialect of English: Some Canadian Evidence. Language Variation and Change 7(2): 209–228.Google Scholar
Clayton, Ian 2017. Preaspiration in Hebrides English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 47(2): 155–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clopper, Cynthia G. 2014. Sound Change in the Individual: Effects of Exposure on Cross-dialect Speech Processing. Laboratory Phonology 5(1): 69–90.Google Scholar
Clopper, Cynthia G. and Pisoni, David B. 2004a. Homebodies and Army Brats: Some Effects of Early Linguistic Experience and Residential History on Dialect Categorization. Language Variation and Change 16(1): 31–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clopper, Cynthia G. and Pisoni, David B. 2004b. Some Acoustic Cues for the Perceptual Categorization of American English Regional Dialects. Journal of Phonetics 32(1): 111–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clopper, Cynthia G. and Pisoni, David B. 2006. Effects of Region of Origin and Geographic Mobility on Perceptual Dialect Categorization. Language Variation and Change 18(2): 193–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clopper, Cynthia G. and Smiljanic, Rajka 2015. Regional Variation in Temporal Organization in American English. Journal of Phonetics 49: 1–15.Google Scholar
Clopper, Cynthia G., Pisoni, David B. and De Jong, Kenneth 2005. Acoustic Characteristics of the Vowel Systems of Six Regional Varieties of American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118(3): 1661–1676.Google Scholar
Cole, Jennifer, Mahrt, Timothy and Roy, Joseph 2017. Crowd-sourcing Prosodic Annotation. Computer Speech & Language 45: 300–325.Google Scholar
Cooley, James W., Lewis, Peter A. W. and Welch, Peter D. 1969. The Finite Fourier Transform. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics 17(2): 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas 2007. Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas, Williams, Angie and Garrett, Peter 1994. The Social Meanings of Welsh English: Teachers’ Stereotyped Judgements. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 15(6): 471–489.Google Scholar
Cox, Felicity 1999. Vowel Change in Australian English. Phonetica 56(1–2): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crystal, Thomas and House, Arthur 1988. Segmental Duration in Connected-Speech Signals: Current Results. Journal of the American Acoustical Society 83(4): 1553–1573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, Cecelia 2003. “Keepin’ It Real”: White Hip‐Hoppers’ Discourses of Language, Race, and Authenticity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 13(2): 211–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daelemans, Walter and van den Bosch, Antal 1997. Language-Independent Data-Oriented Grapheme-to-Phoneme Conversion. In van Santen, J. P. H., Olive, J. P., Sproat, R. W. and Hirschberg, J. (eds.), Progress in Speech Synthesis. New York: Springer: 77–89.Google Scholar
Deshpande, Madhav 2016. Language and Testimony in Classical Indian Philosophy. In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Di Paolo, Marianna and Faber, Alice 1990. Phonation Differences and the Phonetic Content of the Tense-Lax Contrast in Utah English. Language Variation and Change 2(2): 155–204.Google Scholar
Di Paolo, Marianna and Yaeger-Dror, Malcah (eds.) 2011. Sociophonetics: A Student’s Guide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Di Paolo, Marianna, Yaeger-Dror, Malcah and Wassink, Alicia Beckford 2011. Analyzing Vowels. In Di Paolo, Marianna and Yaeger-Dror, Malcah (eds.), Sociophonetics: A Student’s Guide. London: Routledge: 87–106.Google Scholar
Dinkin, Aaron J. and Dodsworth, Robin 2017. Gradience, Allophony, and Chain Shifts. Language Variation and Change 29(1): 101–127.Google Scholar
Docherty, Gerard. 2003. Speaker, Community, Identity: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on Sociophonetic Variation. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Barcelona, Spain: 11–16.Google Scholar
Docherty, Gerard. 2007. Speech in its Natural Habitat: Accounting for Social Factors in Phonetic Variability. In Cole, Jennifer and Hualde, José Ignacio (eds.), Laboratory  Phonology, Vol. 9. New York: Mouton de Gruyter: 1–35.Google Scholar
Docherty, Gerard, Watt, Dominic, Llamas, Carmen, Hall, Damien and Nycz, Jennifer 2011. Variation in Voice Onset Time along the Scottish-English Border. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Hong Kong, China: 591–594.Google Scholar
Dodsworth, Robin 2005. Attribute Networking: A Technique for Modeling Social Perceptions. Journal of Sociolinguistics 9(2): 225–253.Google Scholar
Dodsworth, Robin 2019. Bipartite Network Structures and Individual Differences in Sound Change. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1): 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodsworth, Robin and Kohn, Mary E. 2012. Urban Rejection of the Vernacular: The SVS Undone. Language Variation and Change 24(2): 221–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodsworth, Robin and Benton, Richard 2017. Social Network Cohesion and the Retreat from Southern Vowels in Raleigh. Language in Society 46(3): 371–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Onofrio, Annette 2018. Personae and Phonetic Detail in Sociolinguistic Signs. Language in Society 47(4): 513–539.Google Scholar
D’Onofrio, Annette 2019. Complicating Categories: Personae Mediate Racialized Expectations of Non‐native Speech. Journal of Sociolinguistics 23(4): 346–366.Google Scholar
Drager, Katie 2010. Sociophonetic Variation in Speech Perception. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(7): 473–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drager, Katie 2018. Experimental Research Methods in Sociolinguistics. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Dubois, Sylvie and Horvath, Barbara 1999. When the Music Changes, You Change Too: Gender and Language Change in Cajun English. Language Variation and Change 11(3): 287–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duckworth, Martin, McDougall, Kirsty, de Jong, Gea and Shockey, Linda 2011. Improving the Consistency of Formant Measurement. International Journal of Speech, Language, & Law 18(1): 35–51.Google Scholar
Durian, David 2007. Getting [ʃ]tronger Every Day?: More on Urbanization and the Socio-geographic Diffusion of (str) in Columbus, OH. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 13(2): 65–79.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope 1988. Adolescent Social Structure and the Spread of Linguistic Change. Language in Society 17(2): 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope 1989. Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in High School. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope 1990. The Whole Woman: Sex and Gender Differences in Variation. Language Variation and Change 1(3): 245–267.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope 1996. Vowels and Nail Polish: The Emergence of Linguistic Style in the Preadolescent Heterosexual Marketplace. In Warner, Natashar, Ahlers, Jocelyn, Bilmes, Leela, Oliver, Monica, Wertheim, Suzanne and Chen, Melinda (eds), Gender and Belief Systems. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group: 183–190.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope 2008a. Variation and the Indexical Field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4): 453–476.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope 2008b. Where do Ethnolects Stop? International Journal of Bilingualism 12(1): 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope 2012. Three Waves of Variation Study: The Emergence of Meaning in the Study of Sociolinguistic Variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41(1): 87–100.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope 2017. Comment: The Most Perfect of Signs: Iconicity in Variation. Linguistics 55(5): 1197–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope 2019. The Limits of Meaning: Social Indexicality and the Cline of Interiority. Language 95(4): 751–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope n.d. Third Wave Variation Studies. Retrieved June 2019 from http://web.stanford.edu/~eckert/thirdwave.html.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope and McConnell-Ginet, Sally 2003. Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Jacob 2015. Systematic Patterning in Phonologically‐motivated Orthographic Variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 19(2): 161–188.Google Scholar
Ellis, Alexander J. 1889. On Early English Pronunciation, Part V: The Existing Phonology of English Dialects, Compared with that of West Saxon English. New York: Greenwood Press, 17(2): 21–29.Google Scholar
Ernestus, Mirjam 2014. Acoustic Reduction and the Roles of Abstractions and Exemplars in Speech Processing. Lingua 142: 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernestus, Mirjam and Warner, Natasha (eds.) 2011a. Special Issue on Speech Reduction. Journal of Phonetics 39(3): 253–452.Google Scholar
Ernestus, Mirjam and Warner, Natasha 2011b. An Introduction to Reduced Pronunciation Variants. Journal of Phonetics 39(3): 253–260.Google Scholar
Evanini, Keelan 2009. The Permeability of Dialect Boundaries: A Case Study of the Region Surrounding Erie, Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Evans, Betsey E., Benson, Erica J. and Stanford, James N. (eds.) 2018. Language Regard: Methods, Variation and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Bronwen G. and Iverson, Paul 2004. Vowel Normalization for Accent: An Investigation of Best Exemplar Locations in Northern and Southern British English Sentences. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 115(1): 352–361.Google Scholar
Evans, Bronwen G. and Iverson, Paul 2007. Plasticity in Vowel Perception and Production: A Study of Accent Change in Young Adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121(6): 3814–3826.Google Scholar
Ewald, Otto, Asu, Eva Liina and Schötz, Susanne 2017. The Formant Dynamics of Long Close Vowels in Three Varieties of Swedish. Proceedings of Interspeech 2017, Stockholm, Sweden, August 20–24: 1412–1416.Google Scholar
Faber, Alice and Di Paolo, Marianna 1995. The Discriminability of Nearly Merged Sounds. Language Variation and Change 7(1): 35–78.Google Scholar
Fabricius, Anne H., Watt, Dominic and Johnson, Daniel Ezra 2009. A Comparison of Three Speaker-intrinsic Vowel Formant Frequency Normalization Algorithms for Sociophonetics. Language Variation and Change 21(3): 413–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagyal, Zsuzsanna 2010. Rhythm Types and the Speech of Working-Class Youth in a Banlieue of Paris: The Role of Vowel Elision and Devoicing. In Preston, D. R. and Niedzielski, N. (eds.), A Reader in Sociophonetics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 91–132.Google Scholar
Fairbanks, Grant 1940. Voice and Articulation Drill Book. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Farrington, Charlie, Arnson, Shelby and Kendall, Tyler 2019. The Great Migration and Sound Change: The African American Vowel System in Washington D.C., Presented at 5th Workshop on Sound Change, Davis, CA.Google Scholar
Farrington, Charlie, Kendall, Tyler and Fridland, Valerie. 2018. Vowel Dynamics in the Southern Vowel Shift. American Speech 93(2): 186–222.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph W. 1969. A Sociolinguistic Study of the Pronunciation of Three Vowels in Detroit Speech. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Feagin, Crawford 1986.  More Evidence for Vowel Change in the South. In Sankoff, David (ed.), Diversity and Diachrony. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 83–95.Google Scholar
Feagin, Crawford 1990. The Dynamics of a Sound Change in Southern States English: From R-less to R-ful in Three Generations. In Edmonson, Jerald A., Feagin, Crawford and Mühlhäusler, Peter (eds.), Development and Diversity: Linguistic Variation across Time and Space. Summer Institute of Linguistics/Arlington: University of Texas: 129–146.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Sarah Hargus 2004. Talker Differences in Clear and Conversational Speech: Vowel Intelligibility for Normal-hearing Listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116(4): 2365–2373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, Sarah Hargus and Kewley-Port, Diane 2007. Talker Differences in Clear and Conversational Speech: Acoustic Characteristics of Vowels. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50(5): 1241–1255.Google Scholar
Fischer, John L. 1958. Social Influences on the Choice of a Linguistic Variant. Word 14(1): 47–56.Google Scholar
Flemming, Edward 2003. The Relationship between Coronal Place and Vowel Backness. Phonology 20(3): 335–373.Google Scholar
Flipsen, Peter Jr, Shriberg, Lawrence, Weismer, Gary, Karlsson, Heather and McSweeny, Jane 1999. Acoustic Characteristics of /s/ in Adolescents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42(3): 663–677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Floccia, Caroline, Goslin, Jeremy, Girard, Frédérique and Konopczynski, Gabrielle 2006. Does a Regional Accent Perturb Speech Processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32(5): 1276.Google ScholarPubMed
Flynn, Nicholas 2011. Comparing Vowel Formant Normalization Procedures. York Papers in Linguistics Series 2(11): 1–13.Google Scholar
Forrest, Jon and Dodsworth, Robin. 2016. Towards a Sociologically-grounded View of Occupation in Sociolinguistics. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 22(2): 5.Google Scholar
Forrest, Karen, Weismer, Gary, Milenkovic, Paul and Dougall, Ronald N. 1988. Statistical Analysis of Word‐initial Voiceless Obstruents: Preliminary Data. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84(1): 115–123.Google Scholar
Fought, Carmen 2013. Ethnicity. In Chambers, J. K. and Schilling, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell: 388–406.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Paul 2010. Exploring Social-indexical Knowledge: A Long Past but a Short History. Laboratory Phonology 1(1): 5–39.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Paul and Docherty, Gerard 2006. The Social Life of Phonetics and Phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34(4): 409–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, Paul and French, Peter 2012. Forensic Speaker Comparison: A Linguistic-acoustic Perspective. In Solan, Lawrence M. and Tiersma, Peter M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 557–572.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Paul, Docherty, Gerry and Watt, Dominic 1999. Tracking the Emergence of Sociophonetic Variation. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), San Francisco, CA: 1625–1628.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Paul, Docherty, Gerry and Watt, Dominic 2001. The Emergence of Structured Variation. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 3(7): 67–84.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Paul, Docherty, Gerry and Watt, Dominic 2005. Phonological Variation in Child-directed Speech. Language 81(1): 177–206.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Paul, Scobbie, James M. and Watt, Dominic 2010. Sociophonetics. In Hardcastle, William J. and Laver, John (eds.), The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell: 703–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourier, Jean Baptiste Joseph 1807. Théorie de la Propagation de la Chaleur dans les Solides. Paris: Institute of France.Google Scholar
Fowler, Coral A. 1996. Listeners Do Hear Sounds, Not Tongues. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99(3): 1730–1741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, Michael J. 2017. Accounting for the Role of Homophily in the Participation in Sound Change, North Carolina State University, MA thesis.Google Scholar
Fox, Robert A. and Jacewicz, Ewa 2009. Cross-Dialectal Variation in Formant Dynamics of American English Vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126(5): 2603–2618.Google Scholar
Freeman, Valerie 2014. Bag, Beg, Bagel: Prevelar Raising and Merger in the Pacific Northwest English. University of Washington Working Papers in Linguistics 32: 1–23.Google Scholar
Frid, Alex and Lavner, Yizhar 2010. Acoustic-phonetic Analysis of Fricatives for Classification Using SVM Based Algorithm. Proceedings from IEEE 26th Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel, Eliat, Israel.Google Scholar
Fridland, Valerie 2003. “Tie, Tied and Tight”: The Expansion of /ai/ Monophthongization in African-American and European-American Speech in Memphis, Tennessee. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(3): 279–298.Google Scholar
Fridland, Valerie and Bartlett, Kathy 2006. The Social and Linguistic Conditioning of Back Vowel Fronting Across Ethnic Groups in Memphis, TN. English Language and Linguistics 10(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Fridland, Valerie and Kendall, Tyler 2012. Exploring the Relationship between Production and Perception in the Mid Front Vowels of U.S. English. Lingua 122(7): 779–793.Google Scholar
Fridland, Valerie and Kendall, Tyler 2015. Within-region Diversity in the Southern Vowel Shift: Production and Perception. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Fridland, Valerie and Kendall, Tyler 2018. Regional Identity and Listener Perception. In Evens, Betsy, Benson, Erica and Stanford, James (eds.), Language Regard: Methods, Variation and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 132–150.Google Scholar
Fridland, Valerie and Kendall, Tyler 2019. On the Uniformity of the Low-Back-Merger Shift in the U.S. West and Beyond. In Becker, Kara (ed.), The Low-Back-Merger Shift: Uniting the Canadian Vowel Shift, the California Vowel Shift, and Short Front Vowel Shifts Across North America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press: 100–119.Google Scholar
Fridland, Valerie and Kendall, Tyler in press. Managing Sociolinguistic Data in a Study of Regional Variation. In Berez-Kroeker, Andrea, McDonnell, Bradley, Koller, Eve and Collister, Lauren (eds.), Open Handbook of Linguistic Data Management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fridland, Valerie, Wassink, Alicia, Evans, Betsy and Kendall, Tyler (eds.) 2017. Speech in the Western States Vol. 2: The Mountain West. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Fridland, Valerie, Bartlett, Kathy and Kreuz, Roger 2004. Do You Hear What I Hear? Experimental Measurement of the Perceptual Salience of Acoustically Manipulated Vowel Variants by Southern Speakers in Memphis, TN. Language Variation and Change 16(1): 1–16.Google Scholar
Fridland, Valerie, Bartlett, Kathy and Kreuz, Roger 2005. Making Sense of Variation: Pleasantness and Education Ratings of Regional Vowel Variants. American Speech 80(4): 366–387.Google Scholar
Fridland, Valerie, Kendall, Tyler, Evans, Betsy and Wassink, Alicia (eds.) 2016. Speech in the Western States, Volume 1: The Coastal States. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Frieda, Elaine, Walley, Amanda, Flege, James and Sloane, Michael 2000. Adults' Perception and Production of the English Vowel /i/. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 43(1): 129–143.Google Scholar
Fromont, Robert and Hay, Jennifer 2008. ONZE Miner: The Development of a Browser-based Research Tool. Corpora 3(2): 173–193.Google Scholar
Fromont, Robert and Hay, Jennifer 2012. LaBB-CAT: An Annotation Store. Proceedings of the Australasian Language Technology Association Workshop, Dunedin, New Zealand: 113–117.Google Scholar
Fruehwald, Josef 2015. Introduction to Speech Analysis with FAVE (Forced Alignment & Vowel Extraction). SGSSS SAIL Pathway Event, University of Edinburgh. Retrieved December 2019 from jofrhwld.github.io/workshop/fave2015.htmlGoogle Scholar
Fruehwald, Josef 2016. Filled Pause Choice as a Sociolinguistic Variable. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 22(2): 41–49.Google Scholar
Fruehwald, Josef 2017. Generations, Lifespans, and the Zeitgeist. Language Variation and Change 29(1): 1–27.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Susanne and Toda, Martine 2010. Do Differences in Male Versus Female /s/ Reflect Biological or Socio-phonetic Factors? In Fuchs, Susanne, Toda, Martine and Zygis, Marzena (eds.), Turbulent Sounds: An Interdisciplinary Guide. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gahl, Susanne, Yao, Yao and Johnson, Keith 2012. Why Reduce? Phonological Neighborhood Density and Phonetic Reduction in Spontaneous Speech. Journal of Memory and Language 66(4): 789–806.Google Scholar
Ganong, William F. 1980. Phonetic Categorization in Auditory Word Perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 6(1): 110–125.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk, Kristiansen, Gitte and Peirsman, Yves (eds.) 2010. Advances in Cognitive Sociolinguistics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gick, Bryan, Wilson, Ian and Derrick, Donald 2013. Articulatory Phonetics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard 1970. Evaluative Reactions to Accents. Educational Review 22(3): 211–227.Google Scholar
Godfrey, John J., Holliman, Edward and McDaniel, Jane 1992. Swithchboard: Telephone Speech Corpus for Research and Development. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. San Francisco, CA: IEEE: 517–520.Google Scholar
Goh, Winston 2005. Talker Variability and Recognition Memory: Instance-Specific and Voice-Specific Effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31(1): 40–53.Google Scholar
Goldinger, Stephen 1998. Echoes of Echoes? An Episodic Theory of Lexical Access. Psychological Review 105(2): 251–279.Google Scholar
Goldman-Eisler, Frieda 1968. Psycholinguistics: Experiments in Spontaneous Speech. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Elizabeth, Maclagan, Margaret and Hay, Jennifer 2007. The ONZE Corpus. In Beal, Joan, Corrigan, Karen and Moisl, Hermann (eds.), Creating and Digitizing Language Corpora. Volume 2: Diachronic Databases. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan: 82–104.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew J. 2001. Small-town Values and Big-city Vowels: A Study of the Northern Cities Shift in Michigan. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360–1380.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. 2013. Statistics for Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. 2016. Quantitative Corpus Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grieve, Jack 2009. A Corpus-Based Regional Dialect Survey of Grammatical Variation in Written Standard American English. Northern Arizona University, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Grieve, Jack 2014. A Comparison of Statistical Methods for The Aggregation of Regional Linguistic Variation. In Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt and Wälchli, Bernhard (eds.), Aggregating Dialectology, Typology, and Register Analysis: Linguistic Variation in Text and Speech. New York: Mouton de Gruyter: 53–88.Google Scholar
Grieve, Jack, Speelman, Dirk and Geeraerts, Dirk 2011. A Statistical Method for the Identification and Aggregation of Regional Linguistic Variation. Language Variation and Change 23(2): 193–221.Google Scholar
Grieve, Jack, Speelman, Dirk and Geeraerts, Dirk 2013. A Multivariate Spatial Analysis of Vowel Formants in American English. Journal of Linguistic Geography 1(1): 31–51.Google Scholar
Grigoras, Catalin 2005. Digital Audio Recording Analysis: The Electric Network Frequency (ENF) Criterion. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law 12(1): 63–76.Google Scholar
Grimm, Jacob 1870–1898. Deutsche Grammatik, Vol. 1–4, Scherer, Wilhelm, Roether, Gustav and Schroder, Edward (eds.). Berlin: C. Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
Guirao, Miguelina and Jurado, Maria A. García 1990. Frequency of Occurrence of Phonemes in American Spanish. Revue Québécoise de Linguistique 19(2): 135–149.Google Scholar
Gunter, Kaylynn, Vaughn, Charlotte and Kendall, Tyler 2019. “[s~ʃ]traight up Fourthteenth [s~ʃ]treet”: /stɹ/-retraction and social class in Washington D.C. African American Language. Presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 48, Eugene, OR.Google Scholar
Gunter, Kaylynn, Vaughn, Charlotte and Kendall, Tyler 2020. Perceiving Southernness: Vowel Categories and Acoustic Cues in Southernness Ratings. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 147(1): 643–656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gylfadottir, Duna 2015. Shtreets of Philadelphia: An Acoustic Study of /str/-retraction in a Naturalistic Speech Corpus. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 21(2): 89–97.Google Scholar
Haddican, Bill, Foulkes, Paul, Hughes, Vincent and Richards, Hazel 2013. Interaction of Social and Linguistic Constraints on Two Vowel Changes in Northern England. Language Variation and Change 25(3): 371–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan 2007. Evidence for a Relationship between Synchronic Variability and Diachronic Change in the Queen’s Annual Christmas Broadcasts. In Cole, Jennifer and Hualde, José Ignacio (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 9. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 125–143.Google Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan 2012. The Coarticulatory Basis of Diachronic High Back Vowel Fronting. In Maria-Josep, Solé and Recasens, Daniel (eds.), The Initiation of Sound Change. Perception, Production, and Social Factors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 103–122.Google Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan and Schiel, Florian 2017. /u/-Fronting and Agent-Based Modeling: The Relationship between the Origin and Spread of Sound Change. Language 93(2): 414–445.Google Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan, Kleber, Felicitas and Reubold, Ulrich 2008. Compensation for Coarticulation, /u/-Fronting, and Sound Change in Standard Southern British: An Acoustic and Perceptual Study. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123(5): 2825–2835.Google Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan, Kleber, Felicitas and Reubold, Ulrich 2011. The Contributions of the Lips and the Tongue to the Diachronic Fronting of High Back Vowels in Standard Southern British English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 41(2): 137–156.Google Scholar
Harris, Katherine Safford 1954. Cues for the Identification of the Fricative of American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 26(5): 952.Google Scholar
Harrison, Philip 2004. Variability of Formant Measurements. University of York, MA dissertation.Google Scholar
Harrison, Philip 2013. Making Accurate Formant Measurements: An Empirical Investigation of the Influence of the Measurement Tool, Analysis Settings and Speaker on Formant Measurements. University of York, PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Sarah and Midgley, Jonathan 2005. Formant Frequencies of RP Monophthongs in Four Age Groups of Speakers. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35(2): 183–199.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer and Drager, Katie 2007. Sociophonetics. Annual Review of Anthropology 36: 89–103.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer and Drager, Katie 2010. Stuffed Toys and Speech Perception. Linguistics 48(4): 865–892.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer and Foulkes, Paul 2016. The Evolution of Medial /t/ Over Real and Remembered Time. Language 92(2): 298–330.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Nolan, Aaron and Drager, Katie 2006. From Fush to Feesh: Exemplar Priming in Speech Perception. The Linguistic Review 23(3): 351–379.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Pierrehumbert, Janet, Walker, Abby and LaShell, Patrick 2015. Tracking Word Frequency Effects Through 130 Years of Sound Change. Cognition 139: 83–91.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Warren, Paul and Drager, Katie 2006. Factors Influencing Speech Perception in the Context of a Merger-in-Progress. Journal of Phonetics 34(4): 458–484.Google Scholar
Hejná, Michaela 2015. Pre-aspiration in Welsh English: A Case Study of Aberystwyth. University of Manchester, PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Heselwood, Barry, Plug, Leendert and Tickle, Alison 2010. Assessing Rhoticity Using Auditory, Acoustic and Psycho-acoustic Methods. In Heselwood, Barry and Upton, Clive (eds.), Proceedings of Methods XIII. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang: 331–340.Google Scholar
Hewlett, Nigel, Matthews, Ben and Scobbie, James M. 1999. Vowel duration in Scottish English speaking children. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, San Francisco, CA: 2157–2160.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond 2017a. Early Recordings of Irish English. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Listening to the Past: Audio Records of Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 199–231.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond (ed.) 2017b. Listening to the Past: Audio Recordings of Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hillenbrand, James and Gayvert, Robert T. 1993. Identification of Steady-state Vowels Synthesized from the Peterson and Barney Measurements. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 94(2): 668–674.Google Scholar
Hillenbrand, James, Getty, Laura A., Clark, Michael J. and Wheeler, Kimberlee 1995. Acoustic Characteristics of American English Vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97(5): 3099–3111.Google Scholar
Hilton, Nanna H., Gooskens, Charlotte, Schüppert, Anja and Lenz, Alexandra N. 2012. New Horizons in Sociophonetic Variation and Change. Lingua 7(122): 749–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindle, Donald 1980. The Social and Structural Conditioning of Vowel Variation. University of Pennsylvania, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Hinton, Leanne, Moonwomon, Birch, Bremner, Sue, Luthin, Herb, Van Clay, Mary, Lerner, Jean and Corcoran, Hazel 1987. It’s Not Just the Valley Girls: A Study of California English. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, CA: 117–128.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich 1991. Principles of Historical Linguistics, 2nd ed. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Holliday, Nicole 2019a. Variation in Question Intonation in the Corpus of Regional African American Language. American Speech: A Quarterly of Linguistic Usage 94(1): 110–130.Google Scholar
Holliday, Nicole 2019b. Variation, Race, and Multiracial Identity in Linguistic Research. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 10(1): e1480.Google Scholar
Horvath, Barbara and Sankoff, David 1987. Delimiting the Sydney Speech Community. Language in Society 16(2): 179–204.Google Scholar
House, Arthur S. and Fairbanks, Grant 1953. The Influence of Consonant Environment upon the Secondary Acoustical Characteristics of Vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25(1): 105–113.Google Scholar
House, Arthur S. and Stevens, Kenneth N. 1956. Analog Studies of the Nasalization of Vowels. The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 21(2): 218–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, Yuang, Guo, Diansheng, Kasakoff, Alice and Grieve, Jack 2016. Understanding US Regional Linguistic Variation with Twitter Data Analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 59: 244–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell 1962. The Ethnography of Speaking. In Gladwin, Thomas and Sturtevant, William C. (eds.), Anthropology and Human Behavior. Washington, DC: The Anthropology Society of Washington: 13–53.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell 1972. Models of the Interaction of Language and Social Life. In Gumperez, John and Hymes, Dell (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Rinehart & Winston: 35–71.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell 1974. Foundations of Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Impe, Leen, Geeraerts, Dirk and Speelman, Dirk 2008. Mutual Intelligibility of Standard and Regional Dutch Varieties. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 2(1–2): 101–117.Google Scholar
Jacewicz, Ewa and Fox, Robert A. 2013. Cross-Dialectal Differences in Dynamic Formant Patterns in American English Vowels. In Morrison, Geoffrey S. and Assmann, Peter (eds.), Vowel Inherent Spectral Change. New York: Springer: 177–198.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandria (ed.) 2009. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jain, Mahaveer, McDonough, John, Gweon, Gahgene, Raj, Bhiksha and Rosé, Carolyn Penstein 2012. An Unsupervised Dynamic Bayesian Network Approach to Measuring Speech Style Accommodation. Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Avignon, France: 787–797.Google Scholar
Jankowsky, Kurt 2006. The Neogrammarians. In Brown, Keith (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 582–586.Google Scholar
Jannedy, Stefanie and Hay, Jennifer 2006. Modeling Sociophonetic Variation. Journal of Phonetics 4(34): 405–408.Google Scholar
Jesperson, Otto 1922. Language, Its Nature, Development and Origin. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Jessen, Michael 2008. Forensic Phonetics. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(4): 671–711.Google Scholar
Jesus, Luis M. and Shadle, Christine H. 2002. A Parametric Study of the Spectral Characteristics of European Portuguese Fricatives. Journal of Phonetics 30(3): 437–464.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith 1997. Speech Perception Without Speaker Normalization: An Exemplar Model. In Johnson, Keitn and Mullennix, John W. (eds.), Talker Variability in Speech Processing. San Diego: Academic Press: 145–166.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith 2004. Massive Reduction in Conversational American English. In Yoneyama, K. & Maekawa, K. (eds.), Proceedings of the first session of the 10th international symposium on spontaneous speech: Data and analysis. Tokyo: The National International Institute for Japanese Language: 29–54.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith 2006. Resonance in an Exemplar-based Lexicon: The Emergence of Social Identity and Phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34(4): 485–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Keith 2008. Speaker Normalization in Speech Perception. In Pisoni, D. B. and Remez, R. E. (eds.), The Handbook of Speech Perception. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing: 363–389.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith 2012. Acoustic and Auditory Phonetics, 3rd ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith 2018. Vocal Tract Length Normalization. UC Berkeley PhonLab Annual Report, 14(1): 65–82.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith, Flemming, Edward and Wright, Richard 1993. The Hyperspace Effect: Phonetic Targets Are Hyperarticulated. Language 69(3): 505–528.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith, Strand, Elizabeth and D’Imperio, Mariapaola 1999. Auditory-visual Integration of Talker Gender in Vowel Perception. Journal of Phonetics 27(4): 359–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone,  Barbara 2016. Enregisterment: How Linguistic Items Become Linked with Ways of Speaking. Language and Linguistics Compass 10(11): 632–643.Google Scholar
Jones, Taylor, Kalbfeld, Jessica Rose, Hancock, Ryan and Clark, Robin 2019. Testifying while Black: An Experimental Study of Court Reporter Accuracy in Transcription of African American English. Language 95(2): e216–e252.Google Scholar
Jongman, Allard, Wang, Yue and Sereno, Joan 2000. Acoustic and Perceptual Properties of English Fricatives. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Beijing, China: 536–539.Google Scholar
Joos, Martin 1948. Acoustic Phonetics. Language 24(2): 5–136.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel and Martin, James H. 2008. Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition, 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler 2008. On the History and Future of Sociolinguistic Data. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(2): 332–351.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler 2009. Speech Rate, Pause, and Linguistic Variation: An Examination through the Sociolinguistic Archive and Analysis Project. Duke University, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler 2013a. Speech Rate, Pause, and Sociolinguistic Variation: Studies in Corpus Sociophonetics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler 2013b. Data in the Study of Variation and Change. In Chambers, J. K. and Schilling, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell: 38–56.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler 2014. Archiving and Managing Sociolinguistic Data: The Problems of Portability, Access and Security, and Discoverability and Relevance. Language and Linguistics Compass 8(11): 495–504.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler 2018. Data Preservation and Access. In Mallinson, Christine, Childs, Becky and Van Herk, Gerard (eds.), Data Collection in Sociolinguistics: Methods and Applications, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge: 197–206.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler and Farrington, Charlie. 2018a. The Corpus of Regional African American Language. Version 2018.10.06. Eugene, OR: The Online Resources for African American Language Project. https://oraal.uoregon.edu/coraal.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler and Farrington, Charlie. 2018b. The Corpus of Regional African American Language User Guide. Version 2018.10.06. Eugene, OR: The Online Resources for African American Language Project. https://oraal.uoregon.edu/coraal/userguide/.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler and Vaughn, Charlotte 2015. Measurement Variability in Vowel Formant Estimation: A Simulation Experiment. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress on Phonetics (ICPhS), Glasgow, UK.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler and Vaughn, Charlotte 2020. Exploring Vowel Formant Estimation Through Simulation-based Techniques. Linguistic Vanguard 6(s1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, Tyler and Thomas, Erik R. 2014. Vowels.R: Vowel Manipulation, Normalization, and Plotting. R package version 1.2-2. Retrieved June 2020 from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vowels/.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler and Fridland, Valerie 2012. Variation in Perception and Production of Mid Front Vowels in the U.S. Southern Vowel Shift. Journal of Phonetics 40(2): 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, Tyler and Fridland, Valerie 2016. Mapping the Perception of Linguistic Form: Dialectometry with Perception Data. In Côté, Marie-Hélène, Knooihuizen, Remco and Nerbonne, John (eds.), The Future of Dialects. Berlin: Language Science Press: 173–194.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler and Fridland, Valerie 2017. Regional Relationships Among the Low Vowels of U.S. English: Evidence from Production and Perception. Language Variation and Change 29(2): 245–271.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler, Quartey, Minnie, Farrington, Charlie, McLarty, Jason, Arnson, Shelby and Josler, Brooke 2018. The Corpus of Regional African American Language: DCB (Washington DC 2016). Version 2018.10.06. Eugene, OR: The Online Resources for African American Language Project.Google Scholar
Kent, Ray D. and Read, Charles 1992. Acoustic Analysis of Speech. San Diego, CA: Singular/Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul 2013. Koineization. In Chambers, J. K. and Schilling, Natalie (eds.), Handbook of Language Variation and Change. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell: 519–536.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul and Williams, Ann 2000. Mobility and Social Class in Dialect Levelling: Evidence from New and Old Towns in England. In Mattheier, Klaus (ed.), Dialect and Migration in a Changing Europe. Frankfurt: Peter Lang: 1–13.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul and Wright, Susan 1990. The Validity of Phonetic Transcription: Limitations of a Sociolinguistic Research Tool. Language Variation and Change 2(3): 255–275.Google Scholar
Keshet, Joseph, Sonderegger, Morgan and Knowles, Thea 2014. AutoVOT: A Tool for Automatic Measurement of Voice Onset Time Using Discriminative Structured Prediction. Version 0.91. Retreived June 2020 from http://github.com/mlml/autovot/.Google Scholar
Kiesling, Scott F. 1998. Men’s Identities and Sociolinguistic Variation: The Case of Fraternity Men. Journal of Sociolinguistics 2(1): 69–99.Google Scholar
Kiesling, Scott F. 2009. Style as Stance: Can Stance be the Primary Explanation for Patterns of Sociolinguistic Variation? In Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 171–194.Google Scholar
Kisler, Thomas, Schiel, Florain and Sloetjes, Han 2012. Signal Processing via Web Services: The Use Case WebMAUS. Proceedings from Digital Humanities Conference 2012, Hamburg, Germany: 30–34.Google Scholar
Kleber, Felicitas, Harrington, Jonathan and Reubold, Ulrich 2011. The Relationship between the Perception and Production of Coarticulation During a Sound Change in Progress. Language and Speech 55(3): 383–405.Google Scholar
Koenecke, Allison, Nam, Andrew, Lake, Emily, Nudell, Joe, Quartey, Minnie, Mengesha, Zion, Toups, Connor, Rickford, John R., Jurafsky, Dan and Goel, Sharad 2020. Racial Disparities in Automated Speech Recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117(14): 7684–7689.Google Scholar
Koerner, Konrad 1988. Jacob Grimm’s Place in the Foundation of Linguistics as a Science. Word 39(1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, Mary and Farrington, Charlie 2013. A Tale of Two Cities: Community Density and African American English Vowels. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 19(2): 101–110.Google Scholar
Kolari, Pranam, Finin, Tim and Joshi, Anupam 2006. SVMs for the Blogosphere: Blog Identification and Splog Detection. In Proceedings from AAAI Spring Symposium on Computational Approaches to Analysing Weblogs, Stanford, CA: 92–99.Google Scholar
Koops, Christian 2010. /u/-Fronting is not Monolithic: Two Types of Fronted /u/ in Houston Anglos. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 16(2): 113–122.Google Scholar
Kraljic, Tanya, Brennan, Susan E. and Samuel, Arthur G. 2008. Accommodating Variation: Dialects, Idiolects, and Speech Processing. Cognition 107(1): 51–81.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, William Jr. 2009. The Linguistics of Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, William Jr., Bounds, Paulina, Hettel, Jacqueline, Coats, Steven, Pederson, Lee, Opas-Hänninen, Lisa Lena, Juuso, Ilkka and Seppänen, Tapio 2012.  Digital Archive of Southern Speech LDC2012S03. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, William Jr., McDavid, Virginia, Lerud, Theodore and Johnson, Ellen (eds.), 1993. Handbook of the Linguistic Atlas of the Middle and South Atlantic States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju 1998. Regularity of Sound Change Through Lexical Diffusion: A Study of s > h > Ø in Gondi Dialects. Language Variation and Change 10(2): 193–220.Google Scholar
Krivo, Lauren J., Washington, Heather M., Peterson, Ruth D., Browning, Christopher R., Calder, Catherine A. and Kwan, Mei-Po 2013. Social Isolation of Disadvantage and Advantage: The Reproduction of Inequality in Urban Space. Social Forces 92(1): 141–164.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans 1934. The Linguistic Atlas of New England. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 74(3): 227–243.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans 1949. A Word Geography of the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Labov, William 1963. The Social Motivation of a Sound Change. Word 19(3): 273–309.Google Scholar
Labov, William 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William 1972a. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William 1972b. Some Principles of Linguistic Methodology. Language in Society 1(1): 97–120.Google Scholar
Labov, William 1989. The Exact Description of the Speech Community: Short a in Philadelphia. In Fasold, Ralph and Schiffrin, Deborah (eds.), Language Change and Variation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press: 1–57.Google Scholar
Labov, William 1990. The Intersection of Sex and Social Class in the Course of Linguistic Change. Language Variation and Change 2(2), 205–254.Google Scholar
Labov, William 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change, Volume 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William 2001a. Principles of Linguistic Change, Volume 2: Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William 2001b. The Anatomy of Style Shifting. In Eckert, Penelope and Rickford, John R. (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 85–108.Google Scholar
Labov, William 2006. The Social Stratification of English in New York City, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William 2007. Transmission and Diffusion. Language 83(2): 344–387.Google Scholar
Labov, William 2010. Principles of Linguistic Change, Volume 3: Cognitive and Cultural Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William and Baranowski, Maciej 2006. 50 msec. Language Variation and Change 18(3): 223–240.Google Scholar
Labov, William and Rosenfelder, Ingrid 2011. New Tools and Methods for Very Large Scale Measurements of Very Large Corpora. Paper presented at New Tools and Methods for Very-Large-Scale Phonetics Research, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Rosenfelder, Ingrid and Fruehwald, Josef 2013. One Hundred Years of Sound Change in Philadelphia: Linear Incrementation, Reversal, and Reanalysis. Language 89(1): 30–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Yaeger, Malcah and Steiner, Richard 1972. A Quantitative Study of Sound Change in Progress. Report on National Science Foundation Contract NSF-GS-3287. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Karen, Mark and Miller, Corey 1991. Near-mergers and the Suspension of Phonemic Contrast. Language Variation and Change 3(1): 33–74.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon and Boberg, Charles 2006. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, Ravindranath, Maya, Weldon, Tracey, Baranowski, Maciej and Nagy, Naomi 2011. Properties of the Sociolinguistic Monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(4): 431–463.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Cohen, Paul, Robins, Clarence and Lewis, John 1968. A Study of the Non-Standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican Speakers in New York City. Washington, DC: United States Office of Education Final Report, Research Project 3288.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter 2003. Phonetic Data Analysis: An Introduction to Fieldwork and Instrumental Techniques. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter 2005. Vowels and Consonants: An Introduction to the Sounds of Languages, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter and Broadbent, Donald E. 1957. Information Conveyed by Vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 29(1): 98–104.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter and Johnson, Keith 2014. A Course in Phonetics, 7th ed. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Lambert, Wallace E. 1967. A Social Psychology of Bilingualism. Journal of Social Issues 23(2): 91–109.Google Scholar
Lambert, Wallace E., Frankel, Hannah and Tucker, G. Richard 1966. Judging Personality Through Speech: A French-Canadian Example. Journal of Communication 16(4): 305–321.Google Scholar
Lambert, E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, Robert C. and Fillenbaum, Samuel 1960. Evaluational Reactions to Spoken Language. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60(1): 44–51.Google Scholar
Lamere, Paul, Kwok, Philip, Gouvea, Evandro, Raj, Bhiksha, Singh, Rita, Walker, William, Warmuth, Manfred and Wolf, Peter 2003. The CMU SPHINX-4 Speech Recognition System. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP 2003), Hong Kong: 2–5.Google Scholar
Lanehart, Sonja (ed.) 2015. The Oxford Handbook of African American Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger 1997. Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, Eleanor, Scobbie, James M. and Stuart‐Smith, Jane 2011. The Social Stratification of Tongue Shape for Post-vocalic /r/ in Scottish English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(2): 256–268.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, Eric 1967. Biological Foundations of Language. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Levine, Lewis and Crockett, Harry J. 1966. Speech Variation in a Piedmont Community: Post-vocalic r. Sociological Inquiry 36(2): 204–226.Google Scholar
Levon, Erez 2007. Sexuality in Context: Variation and the Sociolinguistic Perception of Identity. Language in Society 36(4): 533–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levon, Erez and Holmes-Elliott, Sophie 2013. East End Boys and West End Girls: /s/-Fronting in Southeast England. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 19(2): 111–120.Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark Y. 2013. Biology, Sex, Culture, and Pitch. Language Log. Retrieved June 2020 from http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=5908.Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark Y. 2019. Corpus Phonetics. Annual Review of Linguistics 5: 91–107.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn 1963. Spectrographic Study of Vowel Reduction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 35(11): 1773–1781.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn 1990. Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory. In Hardcastle, William J. and Marchal, Alain (eds.), Speech Production and Speech Modelling. Dordrecht: Kluwer: 403–439.Google Scholar
Linville, Sue E. 1998. Acoustic Correlates of Perceived Versus Actual Sexual Orientation in Men’s Speech. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 50(1): 35–48.Google Scholar
Lippi-Green, Rosina 2012. English with an Accent: Language, Ideology, and Discrimination in the United States, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lobanov, Boris M. 1971. Classification of Russian Vowels Spoken by Different Speakers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49: 606–608.Google Scholar
Luce, Paul A. and Charles-Luce, Jan 1985. Contextual Effects on Vowel Duration, Closure Duration, and Consonant/vowel Ratio in Speech Production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 78(6): 1949–1957.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald K. S. 1977. Language, Social Class, and Education: A Glasgow Study. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
MacMahon, Michael K. C. 1986. The International Phonetic Association: The First 100 Years. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 16(1): 30–38.Google Scholar
MacMahon, Michael K. C. 1991. The Woman Behind “Arthur”. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 21(1): 29–31.Google Scholar
Maegaard, Marie and Pharao, Nicolai 2016. (s) Variation and Perceptions of Male Sexuality in Denmark. In Levon, Erez and Mendes, Ronald Beline (eds.), Language, Sexuality and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 88–104.Google Scholar
Mahrt, Tim 2016. LMEDS: Language Markup and Experimental Design Software. Retrieved June 2020 from http://github.com/timmahrt/LMEDS.Google Scholar
Mallinson, Christine 2011. Social Stratification. In Wodak, Ruth, Johnstone, Barbara and Kerswill, Paul E. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Sociolinguistics. London: Sage: 87–99.Google Scholar
Mallinson, Christine, Childs, Becky and Van Herk, Gerald (eds.) 2018. Data Collection in Sociolinguistics: Methods and Applications, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martinet, Andre 1952. Function, Structure and Sound Change. Word 8(1): 1–32.Google Scholar
Massey, Douglas S. and Lundy, Garvey 2001. Use of Black English and Racial Discrimination in Urban Housing Markets: New Methods and Findings. Urban Affairs Review 36(4): 452–469.Google Scholar
McAuliffe, Michael, Coles, Arlie, Goodale, Michael, Mihuc, Sarah, Wagner, Michael, Stuart-Smith, Jane and Sonderegger, Morgan 2019. ISCAN: A System for Integrated Phonetic Analyses Across Speech Corpora. In Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia: 1322–1326.Google Scholar
McAuliffe, Michael, Socolof, Michaela, Mihuc, Sarah, Wagner, Michael and Sonderegger, Morgan 2017. Montreal Forced Aligner: Trainable Text-Speech Alignment Using Kaldi. Proceedings of Interspeech 2017, Stockholm, Sweden: 498–502.Google Scholar
McDavid, Raven Jr. and O’Cain, R. 1980. Linguistic Atlas of the Middle and South Atlantic States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McEnery, Tory, Xiao, Richard and Tono, Yukio 2006. Corpus-based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McGowan, Kevin B. 2015. Social Expectation Improves Speech Perception in Noise. Language and Speech 58(4): 502–521.Google Scholar
McKittrick, David and McVea, David 2012. Making Sense of the Troubles: A History of the Northern Ireland Conflict. London: Viking.Google Scholar
McLarty, Jason 2018. African American Language and European American English Intonation Variation over Time in the American South. American Speech 93(1): 32–78.Google Scholar
McLarty, Jason 2019. Prosodic Prominence Perception, Regional Background, Ethnicity and Experience: Naive Perception of African American English and European American English, University of Oregon, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
McLarty, Jason, Jones, Taylor and Hall, Christopher 2019. Corpus-based Sociophonetic Approaches to Post-vocalic R-lessness in African American Language. American Speech 94(1): 91–109.Google Scholar
McLarty, Jason, Kendall, Tyler and Farrington, Charlie 2016. Investigating the Development of the Contemporary Oregonian Vowel System. In Fridland, Valerie, Kendall, Tyler, Evans, Betsy and Wassink, Alicia (eds.), Speech in the Western States: Volume 1: The Coastal States. Durham, NC: Duke University Press: 135–157.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma 2008. Homegirls: Language and Cultural Practice Among Latina Youth Gangs. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend 2010. Socio-phonetics and Social Change: Deracialisation of the Goose Vowel in South African English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14(1): 3–33.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend 2017. Class, Gender and Substrate Erasure in Sociolinguistic Change: A Sociophonetic Study of Schwa in Deracializing South African English. Language 93(2): 314–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam, Adachi, Chie, Nanbakhsh, Golnaz and Strycharz, Anna 2012. Sociolinguistic Fieldwork. In Thieberger, Nicholas (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Fieldwork. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 147–165.Google Scholar
Mielke, Jeff, Carignan, Christopher and Thomas, Erik R. 2017. The Articulatory Dynamics of Pre-velar and Pre-nasal /æ/-raising in English: An Ultrasound Study. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142(1): 332–349.Google Scholar
Mielke, Jeff, Thomas, Erik R., Fruehwald, Josef, McAuliffe, Michael, Sonderegger, Morgan, Stuart-Smith, Jane and Dodsworth, Robin 2019. Age Vectors Vs. Axes of Intraspeaker Variation in Vowel Formants Measured Automatically from Several English Speech Corpora. Proceedings from the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Melbourne, Australia: 1258–1262.Google Scholar
Milroy, James and Milroy, Lesley 1978. Belfast: Change and Variation in an Urban Vernacular. In Trudgill, Peter (ed.), Sociolinguistic Patterns in British English. London: Edward Arnold: 19–36.Google Scholar
Milroy, James and Milroy, Lesley 1985. Linguistic Change, Social Network and Speaker Innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21(2): 339–384.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley 1987. Language and Social Networks, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley and Milroy, James 1992. Social Network and Social Class: Toward an Integrated Sociolinguistic Model. Language in Society 21(1): 1–26.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Chris 2018. The Perceptual Dialectology of England. In Braber, Natalie and Jansen, Sandra (eds.), Sociolinguistics in England. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Moreton, Elliott and Thomas, Erik R. 2007. Origins of Canadian Raising in Voiceless-coda Effects: A Case Study in Phonologization. In Cole, Jennifer S. and Hualde, José Ignacio (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology 9. New York: Mouton de Gruyter: 37–64.Google Scholar
Morgan, Marcyliena 2004. Speech Community. In Duranti, Alessandro (ed.), Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell: 3–22.Google Scholar
Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart 2009. Forensic Voice Comparison and the Paradigm Shift. Science & Justice 49(4): 298–308.Google Scholar
Munson, Benjamin and Babel, Molly 2007. Loose Lips and Silver Tongues, or, Projecting Sexual Orientation Through Speech. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(5): 416–449.Google Scholar
Munson, Benjamin, Jefferson, Sarah V. and McDonald, Elizabeth C. 2006a. The Influence of Perceived Sexual Orientation on Fricative Identification. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119(4): 2427–2437.Google Scholar
Munson, Benjamin, McDonald, Elizabeth C., DeBoe, Nancy L. and White, Aubrey R.. 2006b. The Acoustic and Perceptual Bases of Judgments of Women and Men’s Sexual Orientation from Read Speech. Journal of Phonetics 34(2): 202–240.Google Scholar
Nassif, Ali Bou, Shahin, Ismail, Attili, Imtinan, Azzeh, Mohammad and Shaalan, Khaled 2019. Speech Recognition Using Deep Neural Networks: A Systematic Review. IEEE Access 7: 19143–19165.Google Scholar
Nearey, Terrance M. 1977.  Phonetic Feature Systems for Vowels, University of Alberta, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Newman, Rochelle 2003. Using Links between Speech Perception and Speech Production to Evaluate Different Acoustic Metrics: A Preliminary Report. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 113(5): 2850–2860.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Dong, Doğruöz, A. Seza, Rosé, Carolyn P. and de Jong, Franciska 2016. Computational Sociolinguistics: A Survey. Computational Linguistics 42(3): 537–593.Google Scholar
Nichols, Patricia C. 1983. Linguistic Options and Choices for Black Women in the Rural South. In Thorne, Barrie, Kramarae, Cheris and Henley, Nancy (eds.), Language, Gender and Society. Rowley, MA: Newbury House: 54–68.Google Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy 1999. The Effect of Social Information on the Perception of Sociolinguistic Variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1): 62–85.Google Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy and Preston, Dennis R. 2000. Folk Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nittrouer, Susan 1995. Children Learn Separate Aspects of Speech Production at Different Rates: Evidence from Spectral Moments. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97(1), 520–530.Google Scholar
Noah, Trevor 2016. Born A Crime: Stories from a South African Childhood. New York: Spiegel & Grau.Google Scholar
Nolan, Francis 1991. Forensic Phonetics. Journal of Linguistics 27(2): 483–493.Google Scholar
Nolan, Francis and Grigoras, Catalin 2005. A Case for Formant Analysis in Forensic Speaker Identification. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 12(2): 143–173.Google Scholar
Nycz, Jennifer and Hall-Lew, Lauren 2014. Best Practices in Measuring Vowel Merger. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 20(1): 060008.Google Scholar
Nygaard, Lynne C. and Pisoni, David B. 1998. Talker-specific Learning in Speech Perception. Perception and Psychophysics 60(3): 355–376.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor 1979. Transcription as theory. In Ochs, Elinor and Schieffelin, Bambi (eds.), Developmental Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press: 43–72.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor 1996. Linguistic Resources for Socializing Humanity. In Gumperz, J. and Levinson, S. (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 407–437.Google Scholar
Ogden, Richard 2001. Turn Transition, Creak and Glottal Stop in Finnish Talk-in-Interaction. Journal of the International Phonetics Association 31(1): 139–152.Google Scholar
Ogden, Richard 2017. Introduction to English Phonetics, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Ohala, John 1974. Experimental Historical Phonology. In Anderson, J. M. and Jones, C. (eds.), Historical Linguistics II. Theory and Description in Phonology. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Edinburgh, September 2–7, 1973. Amsterdam: North Holland: 353–389.Google Scholar
Ohala, John 1981. The Listener as a Source of Sound Change. In Masek, Carrie, Hendrik, Roberta A. and Miller, Mary Frances (eds.), Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Vol. 17. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press: 178–203.Google Scholar
Ohala, John 1989. Sound Change Is Drawn from a Pool of Synchronic Variation. In Breivik, Leiv Earl and Jahr, Ernst Håkon (eds.), Language Change: Contributions to the Study of its Causes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 173–198.Google Scholar
Ohala, John 1993. Sound Change as Nature’s Speech Perception Experiment. Speech Communication 13(1–2): 155–161.Google Scholar
Orton, Harold, Sanderson, Stewart and Widdowson, John 1962–1971.  The Survey of English Dialects: The Basic Material. Leeds: Arnold and Son.Google Scholar
Palmeri, Thomas J., Goldinger, Stephen D. and Pisoni, David B. 1993. Episodic Encoding of Voice Attributes and Recognition Memory for Spoken Words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19(2): 309–328.Google Scholar
Pardo, Jennifer S. 2006. On Phonetic Convergence During Conversational Interaction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119(4): 2382–2393.Google Scholar
Patrick, Peter L. 2002. The Speech Community. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Malden, MA: Blackwell: 573–598.Google Scholar
Peterson, Gordon E. and Barney, Harold L. 1952. Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24(2): 175–184.Google Scholar
Peterson, Gordon E. and Lehiste, Ilse 1960. Duration of Syllable Nuclei in English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 32(6): 693–702.Google Scholar
Petzold, Charles 2008. The Annotated Turing: A Guided Tour Through Alan Turing's Historic Paper on Computability and the Turing Machine. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Pharao, Nicolai and Maegaard, Marie 2017. On the Influence of Coronal Sibilants and Stops on the Perception of Social Meanings in Copenhagen Danish. Linguistics 55(5): 1141–1167.Google Scholar
Pharao, Nicolai, Maegaard, Marie, Møller, Janus Spindler and Kristiansen, Tore 2014. Indexical Meanings of [s] among Copenhagen Youth: Social Perception of a Phonetic Variant in Different Prosodic Contexts. Language in Society 43(1): 1–31.Google Scholar
Picheny, Micahel A., Durlach, Nathaniel I. and Braida, Louis D. 1985. Speaking Clearly for the Hard of Hearing I: Intelligibility Differences between Clear and Conversational Speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 28(1): 96–103.Google Scholar
Picheny, Micahel A., Durlach, Nathaniel I. and Braida, Louis D. 1986. Speaking Clearly for the Hard of Hearing II: Acoustic Characteristics of Clear and Conversational Speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 29(4): 434–446.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2001. Exemplar Dynamics: Word Frequency, Lenition and Contrast. In Bybee, Joan L. and Hopper, Paul J. (eds.), Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 137–157.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2006. The Next Toolkit. Journal of Phonetics 34(4): 516–530.Google Scholar
Pinget, Anne F. 2015. The Actuation of Sound Change, Utrecht University, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Pinget, Anne F., Kager, René and Van de Velde, Hans 2016. Regional Differences in the Perception of a Consonant Change in Progress. Journal of Linguistic Geography 4(2): 65–75.Google Scholar
Pitt, Mark A., Johnson, Keith, Hume, Elizabeth, Kiesling, Scott and Raymond, William 2005. The Buckeye Corpus of Conversational Speech: Labeling Conventions and a Test of Transcriber Reliability. Speech Communication 45(1): 89–95.Google Scholar
Plichta, Bartłomiej and Preston, Dennis R. 2005. The /ay/s Have It: The Perception of /ay/ as a North–South Stereotype in United States English. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 37(1): 107–130.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert 2007. Phonation Type as a Stylistic Variable: The Use of Falsetto in Constructing a Persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(4): 478–504.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert 2011. The California Vowel Shift and Gay Identity. American Speech 86(1): 32–51.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert and Sharma, Devyani (eds.) 2013. Research Methods in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert, D’Onofrio, Annette, Van Hofwegen, Janneke and Kim, Seung Kyung 2015. Country Ideology and the California Vowel Shift. Language Variation and Change 27(2): 157–186.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert, Hall-Lew, Lauren, Brenier, Jason, Starr, Rebecca and Lewis, Stacy 2012. Condoleezza Rice and the Sociophonetic Construction of Identity. In Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel and Cutillas-Espinosa, Juan Antonio (eds.), Style-shifting in Public: New Perspectives on Stylistic Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 65–80.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert, Roberts, Sarah and Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn 2001. Sharing Resources and Indexing Meanings in the Production of Gay Styles. In Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn, Podesva, Robert and Roberts, Sarah (eds.), Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications: 175–189.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana 1989. The Care and Handling of a Mega-corpus. In Fasold, Ralph W. and Schiffrin, Deborah (eds.), Language Change and Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 411–451.Google Scholar
Povey, Daniel, Ghoshal, Arnab, Boulianne, Gilles, Burget, Lukas, Glembek, Ondrej, Goel, Nagendra, Hannemann, Mirko, Motlicek, Petr, Qian, Yanmin, Schwarz, Petr, Silovsky, Jan, Stemmer, Georg and Vesely, Karel 2011. The Kaldi Speech Recognition Toolkit. In IEEE 2011 Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, Big Island, Hawaii.Google Scholar
Pratt, Teresa and D’Onofrio, Annette 2017. Jaw Setting and the California Vowel Shift in Parodic Performance. Language in Society 46(3): 283–312.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. (ed.) 1989. Perceptual Dialectology: Nonlinguists’ Views of Areal Linguistics. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Foris.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1993. Folk Dialectology. In Preston, Dennis (ed.), American Dialect Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall: 333–378.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1996. Where the Worst English Is Spoken. In Schneider, Edgar W. (ed.), Focus on the USA: Varieties of English Around the World. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 297–360.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1997. The South: The Touchstone. In Bernstein, Cynthia, Nunnally, Thomas and Sabino, Robin (eds.), Language Variety in the South Revisited. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press: 311–351.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. (ed.) 1999. Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2010a. Language, People, Salience, Space: Perceptual Dialectology and Language Regard. Dialectologia: Revista electrònica 5(5): 87–131.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2010b. Variation in Language Regard. In Gilles, Peter, Scharloth, Joachim and Ziegler, Evelyn (eds.), Variatio Delectat: Empirische Evidenzen und Theoretische Passungen Sprachlicher Variation. Frankfurt: Peter Lang: 7–27.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2011. The Power of Language Regard: Discrimination, Classification, Comprehension, and Production. Dialectologia: Revista electrònica, Special Issue II: 9–33.Google Scholar
Purnell, Thomas, Raimy, Eric and Salmons, Joseph 2017. Upper Midwestern English. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Listening to the Past: Audio Records of Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 298–324.Google Scholar
Purnell, Thomas, Idsardi, William and Baugh, John 1999. Perceptual and Phonetic Experiments on American English Dialect Identification. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1): 10–30.Google Scholar
R Core Team 2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna: Austria. www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Rathcke, Tamara and Stuart-Smith, Jane 2016. On the Tail of the Scottish Vowel Length Rule in Glasgow. Language and Speech 59(3): 404–430.Google Scholar
Reddy, Sravan and Stanford, James 2015. Toward Completely Automated Vowel Extraction: Introducing DARLA. Linguistics Vanguard 1(1): 15–28.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R. 1986. The Need for New Approaches to Social Class Analysis in Linguistics. Language and Communication 6(3): 215–221.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R. 1991. Sociolinguistic Variation in Cane Walk: A Quantitative Case Study. In Cheshire, Jenny (ed.), English around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 609–616.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R. and King, Sharese 2016. Language and Linguistics on Trial: Hearing Rachel Jeantel (and Other Vernacular Speakers) in the Courtroom and Beyond. Language 92(4): 948–988.Google Scholar
Roach, Peter 2009. English Phonetics and Phonology: A Practical Course, 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Julie 2002. Child Language Variation. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell, 333–348.Google Scholar
Rose, Phil 2002. Forensic Speaker Identification. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Rosenfelder, Ingrid, Fruehwald, Josef, Evanini, Keelan, Seyfarth, Scott, Gorman, Kyle, Prichard, Hilary and Yuan, Jiahong 2015. Forced Alignment and Vowel Extraction (FAVE) Program Suite (version 1.2.2). Retrieved June 2020 from https://github.com/JoFrhwld/FAVE.Google Scholar
Rowicka, Grażyna 2005. American Indian English: The Quinault Case. English World-Wide 26(3): 301–324.Google Scholar
Rubin, Donald 1992. Nonlanguage Factors Affecting Undergraduates’ Judgments of Nonnative English-speaking Teaching Assistants. Research in Higher Education, 33(4): 511–531.Google Scholar
Ryalls, John, Zipprer, Allison and Baldauff, Penelope 1997. A Preliminary Investigation of the Effects of Gender and Race on Voice Onset Time. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 40(3): 642–645.Google Scholar
Ryan, Ellen Bouchard and Giles, Howard (eds.) 1982. Attitudes towards Language Variation: Social and Applied Contexts. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian 2018. Language Change across the Lifespan. Annual Review of Linguistics 4: 297–316.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian and Blondeau, Hélène 2007. Language Change across the Lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language 83(3): 560–588.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian and Wagner, Suzanne Evans 2006. Age-grading in Retrograde Movement: The Inflected Future in Montréal French. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 12(2): 203–216.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de 1916 [1959]. Course in General Linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Sayers, Dave 2014. The Mediated Innovation Model: A Framework for Researching Media Influence in Language Change. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18(2): 185–212.Google Scholar
Saygin, Ayes Pinar, Cicekli, Ilyas and Akman, Varol 2000. Turing Test: 50 Years Later. Minds and Machines 10(4): 463–518.Google Scholar
Scarborough, Rebecca, Brenier, Jason, Zhao, Yuan, Hall-Lew, Lauren and Dmitrieva, Olga 2007. An Acoustic Study of Real and Imagined Foreigner-directed Speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121(5): 3044.Google Scholar
Schilling, Natalie 2013. Sociolinguistic Fieldwork. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie 2002. Investigating Stylistic Variation. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Variation and Change. Malden, MA: Blackwell: 375–401.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. (ed.) 1996. Focus on the USA. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sen, Soumya, Dutta, Anjan and Dey, Nilanjan 2019. Audio Processing and Speech Recognition: Concepts, Techniques and Research Overviews. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Shadle, Christine H. and Mair, Sheila J. 1996. Quantifying Spectral Characteristics of Fricatives. In Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Philadelphia, PA: 1521–1524.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack 2010. Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael 2003. Indexical Order and the Dialectics of Sociolinguistic Life. Language and Communication 23(3–4): 193–229.Google Scholar
Simpson, Adrian 2009. Phonetic Differences between Male and Female Speech. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(2): 621–640.Google Scholar
Sonderegger, Morgan, Stuart-Smith, Jane, McAuliffe, Michael, Macdonald, Rachel and Kendall, Tyler in press. Managing Data for Integrated Speech Corpus Analysis in Speech Across Dialects of English (SPADE). Open Handbook of Linguistic Data Management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sonderegger, Morgan, Wagner, Michael and Torreira, Francisco 2018. Quantitative Methods for Linguistic Data. v. 1.0. Retrieved June 2020 from http://people.linguistics.mcgill.ca/~morgan/book/.Google Scholar
Soukup, Barbara 2013. Austrian Dialect as a Metonymic Device: A Cognitive Sociolinguistic Investigation of Speaker Design and its Perceptual Implications. Journal of Pragmatics 52: 72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, James 2008. A Sociotonetic Analysis of Sui Dialect Contact. Language Variation and Change 20(3): 409–450.Google Scholar
Casasanto, Staum, Laura, Kyle Jasmin and Casasanto, Daniel 2010. Virtually Accommodating: Speech Rate Accommodation to a Virtual Interlocutor. Proceedings of 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2010), Portland, OR: 127–132.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth 1998. Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth and Blumstein, Sheila E. 1978. Invariant Cues for Place of Articulation in Stop Consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 64(5): 1358–1368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stockwell, Robert and Minkova, Donka 1997. On Drifts and Shifts. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: An International Review of English Studies 31: 283–303.Google Scholar
Strand, Elizabeth 1999. Uncovering the Role of Gender Stereotypes in Speech Perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1): 86–99.Google Scholar
Strand, Elizabeth and Johnson, Keith 1996. Gradient and Visual Speaker Normalization in the Perception of Fricatives. In Gibbon, Dafydd (ed.), Natural Language Processing and Speech Technology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 14–26.Google Scholar
Strange, Winifred 1995. Cross-language Studies of Speech Perception: A Historical Review. In Strange, Winifred (ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Baltimore, MD: York Press: 3–48.Google Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane 2007. Empirical Evidence for Gendered Speech Production: /s/ in Glaswegian. In Cole, Jennifer and Hualde, José Ignacio (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 9. New York: Mouton de Gruyter: 65–86.Google Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane, Timmins, Claire and Tweedie, Fiona 2007. “Talkin’ Jockney”? Variation and Change in Glaswegian Accent. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(2): 221–260.Google Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane, Pryce, Gwilym, Timmins, Claire and Gunter, Barrie 2013. Television Can also be a Factor in Language Change: Evidence from an Urban Dialect. Language 89(3): 501–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane, Sonderegger, Morgan, Macdonald, Rachel, Mielke, Jeff, McAuliffe, Michael and Thomas, Erik 2019. Large-scale Acoustic Analysis of Dialectal and Social Factors in English /s/-retraction. Proceedings from the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Melbourne, Australia: 1273–1277.Google Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane, Sonderegger, Morgan, Rathcke, Tamara and Macdonald, Rachel 2015. The Private Life of Stops: VOT in a Real-time Corpus of Spontaneous Glaswegian. Laboratory Phonology 6(3–4): 505–549.Google Scholar
Sumner, Meghan and Samuel, Arthur G. 2009. The Effect of Experience on the Perception and Representation of Dialect Variants. Journal of Memory and Language 60(4): 487–501.Google Scholar
Sussman, Harvey M., McCaffrey, Helen A. and Matthews, Sandra A. 1991. An Investigation of Locus Equations as a Source of Relational Invariance for Stop Place Categorization. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 90(3): 1309–1325.Google Scholar
Swan, Julia 2016. Canadian English in the Pacific Northwest: A Phonetic Comparison of Vancouver, B.C. and Seattle, WA. Proceedings from the 2016 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, Calgary, Alberta, Canada: 1–15.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali 2004. Somethi[ŋ]’s Goi[n] On!: Variable (ing) at Ground Zero. In Gunnarsson, Britt-Louise, Bergström, Lena, Eklund, Gerd, Fidell, Staffan, Hansen, Lise H., Karstadt, Angela, Nordberg, Bengt, Sundergren, Eva and Thelander, Mats (eds.), Language Variation in Europe: Papers from the Second International Conference on Language Variation in Europe, ICLaVE 2. Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala Universitet: 390–403.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali 2012. Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali and D’Arcy, Alexandra 2009. Peaks Beyond Phonology: Adolescence, Incrementation, and Language Change. Language 85(1): 58–108.Google Scholar
Tamminga, Meredith 2016. Persistence in Phonological and Morphological Variation. Language Variation and Change 28(3): 335–356.Google Scholar
Tamminga, Meredith 2019. Sources of Microtemporal Clustering in Sociolinguistic Sequences. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 2.Google Scholar
Tamminga, Meredith, MacKenzie, Laurel and Embick, David 2016. The Dynamics of Variation in Individuals. Linguistic Variation 16(2): 300–336.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 2001. An Acoustic Analysis of Vowel Variation in New World English. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 2002a. Instrumental Phonetics. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Malden, MA: Blackwell: 168–200.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 2002b. Sociophonetic Applications of Speech Perception Experiments. American Speech 77(2): 115–147.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 2006. Evidence from Ohio on the Evolution of /æ/. In Murray, Thomas E. and Simon, Beth Lee (eds.), Language Variation and Change in the American Midland: A New Look at “Heartland” English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 69–89.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 2011. Sociophonetics: An Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 2015. Prosodic features of African American English. In Lanehart, Sonja (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of African American Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 420–435.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. (ed.) 2019. Mexican American English: Substrate Influence and the Birth of an Ethnolect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. and Bailey, Guy 2015. Segmental Phonology of African American English. In Lanehart, Sonja (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of African American Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 403–419.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. and Carter, Phillip 2006. Prosodic Rhythm and African American English. English World Wide 27(3): 331–355.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. and Kendall, Tyler 2007. NORM: The Vowel Normalization and Plotting Suite. Retreived June 2020 from http://lingtools.uoregon.edu/norm/.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. and Reaser, Jeffrey 2004. Delimiting Perceptual Cues Used for the Ethnic Labeling of African American and European American Voices. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(1): 54–87.Google Scholar
Torgersen, Eivind N. and Szakay, Anita 2012. An Investigation of Speech Rhythm in London English. Lingua 122(7): 822–840.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter 1972. Sex, Covert Prestige, and Linguistic Change in the Urban British English of Norwich. Language and Society 1(2): 179–196.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter 1974. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter 1983. On Dialect: Social and Geographical Perspectives. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turing, Alan 1950. Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind 59(236): 433–460.Google Scholar
Turner, Richard E., Walters, Thomas C., Monaghan, Jessica and Patterson, Roy D. 2009. A Statistical, Formant-pattern Model for Segregating Vowel Type and Vocal-tract Length in Developmental Formant Data. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125(4): 2374–2386.Google Scholar
Vallabha, Gautam K. and Tuller, Betty 2002. Systematic Errors in the Formant Analysis of Steady-state Vowels. Speech Communication 38(1–2): 141–160.Google Scholar
Van Bezooijen,  Renée and Gooskens, Charlotte 1999. Identification of Language Varieties: The Contribution of Different Linguistic Levels. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1): 31–48.Google Scholar
Van de Ven, Marco, Ernestus, Mirjan and Schreuder, Robert 2012. Predicting Acoustically Reduced Words in Spontaneous Speech: The Role of Semantic/Syntactic and Acoustic Cues in Context. Laboratory Phonology 3(2): 455–481.Google Scholar
Van Herk, Gerard 2008. Fear of a Black Phonology: The Northern Cities Shift as Linguistic White Flight. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 14(2): 157–161.Google Scholar
Vaughn, Charlotte 2019. Expectations About the Source of a Speaker's Accent Affect Accent Adaptation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 145(5): 3218–3232.Google Scholar
Vaughn, Charlotte and Kendall, Tyler 2018a. Listener Sensitivity to Probabilistic Conditioning of Sociolinguistic Variables: The Case of (ING). Journal of Memory and Language 103: 58–73.Google Scholar
Vaughn, Charlotte and Kendall, Tyler 2018b. Stylistic Covariation and Variable (ING). Paper presented at LabPhon 16, Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
Vaughn, Charlotte and Kendall, Tyler 2019. Stylistically Coherent Variants: Cognitive Representation of Social Meaning. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem 27(4): 1787–1830.Google Scholar
Verbrugge, Robert R., Strange, Winifred, Shankweiler, Donald P. and Edman, Thomas R. 1976. What Information Enables a Listener to Map a Talker’s Vowel Space? The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 60(1): 198–212.Google Scholar
Villarreal, Dan 2016. Do I Sound Like a Valley Girl to You? Perceptual Dialectology and Language Attitudes in California. In Fridland, Valerie, Kendall, Tyler, Evans, Betsy and Wassink, Alicia (eds.), Speech in the Western States, Vol. 1: The Coastal States. Durham, NC: Duke University Press: 55–75.Google Scholar
Villarreal, Dan 2018. The Construction of Social Meaning: A Matched-Guise Investigation of the California Vowel Shift. Journal of English Linguistics 46(1): 52–78.Google Scholar
Wagner, Suzanne Evans 2012. Age Grading in Sociolinguistic Theory. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(6): 371–382.Google Scholar
Wagner, Suzanne Evans, Mason, Alexander, Nesbitt, Monica, Pevan, Erin and Savage, Matt 2016. Reversal and Re-organization of the Northern Cities Shift in Michigan. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 22(2): 19.Google Scholar
Wald, Benji and Shopen, Timothy 1981. A Researcher’s Guide to the Sociolinguistic Variable (ING). In Shopen, Timothy and Williams, Joseph M. (eds.), Style and Variables in English. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop: 219–249.Google Scholar
Walkden, George 2019. The Many Faces of Uniformitarianism in Linguistics. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Walton, Julie H. and Orlikoff, Robert F. 1994. Speaker Race Identification from Acoustic Cues in the Vocal Signal. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 37(4): 738–745.Google Scholar
Wang, William S.-Y. 1969. Competing Changes as a Cause of Residue. Language 45(1): 9–25.Google Scholar
Wang, William S.-Y. and Cheng, C.-C. 1977. Implementation of Phonological Change: The Shaungfeng Chinese Case. In Wang, William S.-Y. (ed.), The Lexicon in Phonological Change. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter: 86–100.Google Scholar
Warner, Natasha and Tucker, Benjamin V. 2011. Phonetic Variability of Stops and Flaps in Spontaneous and Careful Speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130(3): 1606–1617.Google Scholar
Warren, Paul 2005. Patterns of Late Rising in New Zealand English: Intonational Variation or Intonational Change? Language Variation and Change 17(2): 209–230.Google Scholar
Wasserman, Stan and Faust, Katherine 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wassink, Alicia Beckford 2006. A Geometric Representation of Spectral and Temporal Vowel Features: Quantification of Vowel Overlap in Three Linguistic Varieties. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119(4): 2334–2350.Google Scholar
Wassink, Alicia Beckford 2015. Sociolinguistic Patterns in Seattle English. Language Variation and Change 27(1): 31–58.Google Scholar
Wassink, Alicia Beckford 2016. The Social Networks of Minority Ethnicity Group Members in Washington State. Paper presented at the 45th New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV), Simon Fraser University and University of Victoria, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
Wassink, Alicia Beckford, Squizzero, Robert, Fellin, Campion and Nichols, David 2018. CLOx: Automated Transcription for Sociolinguistic Interviews. Paper presented at the 47th New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV), New York: New York University.Google Scholar
Watt, Dominic 2018. Applied Dialectology: Dialect Coaching, Dialect Reduction, and Forensic Phonetics. In Boberg, Charles, Nerbonne, John and Watt, Dominic (eds.), The Handbook of Dialectology. Oxford: Wiley: 219–232.Google Scholar
Watt, Dominic and Ingham, Catherine 2000. Durational Evidence of the Scottish Vowel Length Rule in Berwick English. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 8: 205–228.Google Scholar
Watt, Dominic, Fabricius, Anne H. and Kendall, Tyler 2011. More on Vowels: Plotting and Normalization. In Di Paolo, Marianna and Yaeger-Dror, Malcah (eds.), Sociophonetics: A Student’s Guide. London: Routledge: 107–118.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William and Herzog, Marvin 1968. Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change. In Lehmann, Winfred P. and Malkiel, Yakov (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press: 95–195.Google Scholar
Wieling, Martijn, Grieve, Jack, Bouma, Gosse, Fruehwald, Josef, Coleman, John and Liberman, Mark 2016. Variation and Change in the Use of Hesitation Markers in Germanic Languages. Language Dynamics and Change 6(2): 199–234.Google Scholar
Wilbanks, Eric 2017. Social and Structural Constraints on a Phonetically-Motivated Change in Progress: (str) Retraction in Raleigh, NC. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 23(1): 301–310.Google Scholar
Williams, Angie, Garrett, Peter and Coupland, Nikolas 1999. Dialect Recognition. In Preston, Dennis R. (ed.), Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 345–358.Google Scholar
Williams, Angie, Garrett, Peter and Coupland, Nikolas 2009. Perceptual Dialectology, Folklinguistics, and Regional Stereotypes: Teachers’ Perceptions of Variation in Welsh English. Multilingua-Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 15(2): 171–200.Google Scholar
Willis, Clodius 1972. Perception of Vowel Phonemes in Fort Erie, Ontario, Canada, and Buffalo, New York: An Application of Synthetic Vowel Categorization. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 15(2): 246–255.Google Scholar
Winter, Bodo 2019. Statistics for Linguists: An Introduction Using R. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt 1969. A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt 1993. Identifying and Interpreting Variables. In Preston, Dennis (ed.), American Dialect Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 193–221.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt 2007. Sociolinguistic Folklore in the Study of African American English. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(4): 292–313.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt 2013. Community Commitment and Responsibility. In Chambers, J. K. and Schilling, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell: 555–576.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt and Schilling, Natalie. 2016 American English: Dialects and Variation, 3rd ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt and Fasold, Ralph 1974. The Study of Social Dialects in American English. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Wong, Amy 2007. Two Vernacular Features in the English of Four American-born Chinese. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 13(2): 217–230.Google Scholar
Wormald, Jessica 2015. Dynamic Variation in ‘Panjabi-English’: Analysis of F1 and F2 Trajectories for FACE and GOAT. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Glasgow, UK.Google Scholar
Yaeger-Dror, Malcah and Thomas, Erik 2010. African American English Speakers and Their Participation in Local Sound Changes: A Comparative Study. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Yaeger-Dror, Malcah, Kendall, Tyler, Foulkes, Paul, Watt, Dominic, Oddie, Jillian, Harrison, Philip and Kavanagh, Colleen 2009. Perception of r-fulness by Trained Listeners. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Yu, Alan C. L. 2010. Perceptual Compensation is Correlated with Individuals' “Autistic” Traits: Implications for Models of Sound Change. PloS One 5(8): e11950.Google Scholar
Yu, Alan C. L. 2013. Individual Differences in Socio-cognitive Processing and the Actuation of Sound Change. In Yu, Alan C. L. (ed.), Origins of Sound Change: Approaches to Phonologization. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 201–227.Google Scholar
Yuan, Jiahong and Liberman, Mark 2008. Speaker Identification on the SCOTUS Corpus. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123(5): 3878.Google Scholar
Yuan, Jiahong and Liberman, Mark 2009. Investigating /l/ Variation in English Through Forced Alignment. Paper presented at the Tenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Brighton, UK: 2179–2182.Google Scholar
Yuan, Jiahong and Liberman, Mark 2011. Automatic Detection of “g-dropping” in American English Using Forced Alignment. Proceedings of 2011 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition & Understanding, Big Island, Hawaii: 490–493.Google Scholar
Zeller, Christine 1997. The Investigation of a Sound Change in Progress: /æ/ to /e/ in Midwestern American English. Journal of English Linguistics 25(2): 142–155.Google Scholar
Zimman, Lal 2013. Hegemonic Masculinity and the Variability of Gay‐sounding Speech: The Perceived Sexuality of Transgender Men. Journal of Language and Sexuality 2(1): 1–39.Google Scholar
Zimman, Lal 2017. Gender as Stylistic Bricolage: The Contextual Production and Perception of Gender in the Voices of Transgender Speakers. Language in Society 46(3): 339–370.Google Scholar
Zimman, Lal 2018. Transgender Voices: Insights on Identity, Embodiment, and the Gender of the Voice. Language and Linguistics Compass, 12(8): e12284.Google Scholar
Zipf, George Kingsley 1949. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Oxford: Addison-Wesley Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Tyler Kendall, University of Oregon, Valerie Fridland, University of Nevada, Reno
  • Book: Sociophonetics
  • Online publication: 26 February 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316809709.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Tyler Kendall, University of Oregon, Valerie Fridland, University of Nevada, Reno
  • Book: Sociophonetics
  • Online publication: 26 February 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316809709.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Tyler Kendall, University of Oregon, Valerie Fridland, University of Nevada, Reno
  • Book: Sociophonetics
  • Online publication: 26 February 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316809709.011
Available formats
×