Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:36:51.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2019

Edited by
Sergi Oms  and
Elia Zardini
Sergi Oms
Affiliation:
Universitat de Barcelona
Elia Zardini
Affiliation:
University of Lisbon
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Sorites Paradox , pp. 307 - 326
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, E. W. 1998. A Primer of Probability Logic. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Ajdukiewicz, K. 1965. Logika pragmatyczna. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Åkerman, J. 2012. ‘Contextualist Theories of Vagueness’, Philosophy Compass 7: 470–80.Google Scholar
Åkerman, J. and Greenough, P. 2010a. ‘Hold the Context Fixed – Vagueness Still Remains’, in Dietz, R. and Moruzzi, S. (eds.), Cuts and Clouds: Essays on the Nature and Logic of Vagueness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 275–88.Google Scholar
Åkerman, J. and Greenough, P. 2010b. ‘Vagueness and Non-Indexical Contextualism’, in Sawyer, S. (ed.), New Waves in Philosophy of Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 8–23.Google Scholar
Alchourrón, C. and Bulygin, E. 1971. Normative Systems. Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
Alxatib, S. and Pelletier, F. 2011. ‘The Psychology of Vagueness: Borderline Cases and Contradictions’, Mind and Language 26: 287–326.Google Scholar
Armour-Garb, B. 2004. ‘Minimalism, the Generalization Problem and the Liar’, Synthese 139: 491–512.Google Scholar
Armour-Garb, B. 2010. ‘Horwichian Minimalism and the Generalization Problem’, Analysis 70: 693–703.Google Scholar
Armour-Garb, B. and Beall, JC (eds.) 1996. Deflationary Truth. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Arnauld, A. and Nicole, P. 1992. La logique ou l’art de penser. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar
Arrhenius, G., Ryberg, J. and Tännsjö, T. 2017. ‘The Repugnant Conclusion’, in E. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy(https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/repugnant-conclusion).Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. 1950. ‘A Difficulty in the Concept of Social Welfare’, Journal of Political Economy 58: 328–46.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. 1959. ‘Rational Choice Functions and Orderings’, Economica 26: 121–7.Google Scholar
Arruda, A. I. 1989. ‘Aspects of the Historical Development of Paraconsistent Logic’, in Priest, G., Routley, R. and Norman, J. (eds.), Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent. Munich: Philosophia Verlag, pp. 99–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asenjo, F. 1966. ‘A Calculus of Antinomies’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 7: 103–5.Google Scholar
Asgeirsson, H. 2015. ‘On the Instrumental Value of Vagueness in the Law’, Ethics 125: 425–48.Google Scholar
Asher, N., Dever, J. and Pappas, C. 2009. ‘Supervaluations Debugged’, Mind 118: 901–33.Google Scholar
Gellius, Aulus 1927. The Attic Nights. With an English translation by J. C. Rolfe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bale, A. 2009. ‘A Universal Scale of Comparison’, Linguistics and Philosophy 31: 1–55.Google Scholar
Barker, C. 2002. ‘The Dynamics of Vagueness’, Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 1–36.Google Scholar
Barnes, E. 2005. ‘Vagueness and Arbitrariness: Merricks on Composition’, Mind 116: 105–13.Google Scholar
Barnes, E. 2013. ‘Metaphysically Indeterminate Existence’, Philosophical Studies 166: 495–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, E. 2014. ‘Fundamental Indeterminacy’, Analytic Philosophy 55: 339–62.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1982. ‘Medicine, Experience, and Logic’, in Barnes, J., Brunschwig, J., Burnyeat, M. F. and Schofield, M. (eds.), Science and Speculation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 24–68. (Reprinted in J. Barnes (2012), pp. 538–81. Page references are to the reprint.)Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 2012. Logical Matters: Essays in Ancient Philosophy II. Edited by Bonelli, M.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bartsch, R. and Vennemann, T. 1972. ‘The Grammar of Relative Adjectives and Comparison’, Linguistische Berichte 20: 19–32.Google Scholar
Bartsch, R. and Vennemann, T. 1973. Semantic Structures: A Study in the Relation between Syntax and Semantics. Frankfurt: Athenäum Verlag.Google Scholar
Beall, JC (ed.) 2003. Liars and Heaps: New Essays on Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beall, JC (ed.) 2008. Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beall, JC 2009. Spandrels of Truth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Beall, JC and Armour-Garb, B. (eds.) 2005a. Deflationism and Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beall, JC and Armour-Garb, B. 2005b. ‘Minimalism, Epistemicism and Paradox’, in Beall, JC and Armour-Garb, B. (eds.), Deflationism and Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 85–96.Google Scholar
Beall, JC and Murzi, J. 2013. ‘Two Flavors of Curry Paradox’, The Journal of Philosophy 110: 143–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beall, JC and van Fraassen, , B. C. 2003. Possibilities and Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, S., Krasikova, S., Fleischer, D., Gergel, R., Hofstetter, S., Savelsberg, C., Vanderelst, J. and Villalta, E. 2009. ‘Crosslinguistic Variation in Comparative Constructions’, Linguistic Variation Yearbook 9: 1–66.Google Scholar
Běhounek, L. 2014. ‘In Which Sense Is Fuzzy Logic a Logic for Vagueness’, in Lukasiewicz, T., Peñaloza, R. and Turhan, A. Y. (eds.), Logics for Reasoning about Preferences, Uncertainty, and Vagueness. Oxford: CEUR, pp. 26–38.Google Scholar
Běhounek, L. 2016. ‘Determinate Truth in Fuzzy Plurivaluationism’, in Arazim, P., Lavicka, T. (eds.), The Logica Yearbook 2016. London: College, 2017, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Bennett, K. 2004. ‘Spatiotemporal Coincidence and the Grounding Problem’, Philosophical Studies 118: 339–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berker, S. 2008. ‘Luminosity Regained’, Philosophers’ Imprint 8: 1–22.Google Scholar
Beth, E. W. 1954. ‘Le paradoxe du “sorite” d’Eubulide de Mégare’, in La vie, la pensée: Actes du VIIe Congrés des sociétés de philosophie de langue française. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 237–41.Google Scholar
Béziau, J. Y. 2006. ‘Transitivity and Paradoxes’, The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 1: 87–92.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, M. 1989. ‘The Semantics of Gradation’, in Bierwisch, M. and Lang, E. (eds.), Dimensional Adjectives. Berlin: Springer, pp. 71–262.Google Scholar
Black, M. 1937. ‘Vagueness: An Exercise in Logical Analysis’, Philosophy of Science 4: 427–55.Google Scholar
Blackburn, P., Rijke, M. and Venema, Y. 2001. Modal Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, S. 2002. Being Good: A Short Introduction to Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, J. 2012. Universals in Comparative Morphology: Suppletion, Superlatives, and the Structure of Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobzien, S. 2002. ‘Chrysippus and the Epistemic Theory of Vagueness’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102: 217–38.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. 2011. ‘If It’s Clear, then It’s Clear that It’s Clear, or Is It? Higher-Order Vagueness and the S4 Axiom’, in Morison, B. and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.), Episteme, etc.: Essays in Honour of Jonathan Barnes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 189–239.Google Scholar
Bochnak, M. R. 2013. ‘Cross-Linguistic Variation in the Semantics of Comparatives’. PhD thesis, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Bogusławski, A. 1975. ‘Measures Are Measures: In Defence of the Diversity of Comparatives and Positives’, Linguistische Berichte 36: 1–9.Google Scholar
Bonini, N., Osherson, D., Viale, R. and Williamson, T. 1999. ‘On the Psychology of Vague Predicates’, Mind and Language 14: 377–93.Google Scholar
Borel, É. 1907. ‘Un paradoxe économique: le sophisme du tas de blé et les vérités statistiques’, La revue du mois 4: 688–99. (English translation by P. Égré and E. Gray 2014. ‘An Economic Paradox: The Sophism of the Heap of Wheat and Statistical Truths’, Erkenntnis 79: 1081–8.)Google Scholar
Borel, É. 1950. Probability and Certainty. New York: Walker and Company.Google Scholar
Bossuet, J. B. 1677. Logique du Dauphin. Edited by F. Laupiès. Paris: Éditions Universitaires, 1990.Google Scholar
Braun, D. and Sider, T. 2007. ‘Vague, So Untrue’, Noûs 41: 133–56.Google Scholar
Brouwer, L. E. J. 1908. ‘De onbetrouwbaarheid der logische principes’, Tijdschrift voor wijsbegeerte 2: 152–8.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. 2009. Aristote: Topiques. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Burgess, A. G. and Burgess, J. P. 2011. Truth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Burnett, H. 2016. Gradability in Natural Language: Logical and Grammatical Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 1982. ‘Gods and Heaps’, in Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.), Language and Logos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 315–38.Google Scholar
Caie, M. 2012. ‘Vagueness and Semantic Indiscernibility’, Philosophical Studies 160: 365–77.Google Scholar
Calder, A. J., Young, A. W., Perrett, D. I., Etcoff, N. L. and Rowland, D. 1996. ‘Categorical Perception of Morphed Facial Expressions’, Visual Cognition 3: 81–118.Google Scholar
Cameron, R. P. 2010. ‘Vagueness and Naturalness’, Erkenntnis 72: 281–93.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. 1974. ‘The Sorites Paradox’, Philosophical Studies 26: 175–91.Google Scholar
Cargile, J. 1969. ‘The Sorites Paradox’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20: 193–202.Google Scholar
Casari, E. 1989. ‘Comparative logics and Abelian ℓ-groups’, in Ferro, R., Bonotto, C., Valentini, S. and Zanardo, A. (eds.), Logic Colloquium ‘88. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 161–90.Google Scholar
Cayrol, N. 2016. ‘Qu’est-ce qu’un sorite?’, in Pascal, J., Mouzet, P. and Tellier-Cayrol, V. (eds.), Mélanges en l’honneur du Professeur Jean Rossetto. Issy-les-Moulineaux: LGDJ, pp. 241–64.Google Scholar
Chambers, T. 1998. ‘On Vagueness, Sorites, and Putnam’s Intuitionistic Strategy’, The Monist 81: 343–8.Google Scholar
Chang, R. 2002. ‘The Possibility of Parity’, Ethics 112: 659–88.Google Scholar
Cherniak, C. 1984. ‘Computational Complexity and the Universal Acceptance of Logic’, The Journal of Philosophy 81: 739–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chihara, C. S. 1979. ‘The Semantic Paradoxes: A Diagnostic Investigation’, The Philosophical Review 88: 590–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, R. M. 1967. ‘Identity through Possible Worlds: Some Questions’, Noûs 1: 1–8.Google Scholar
Chisholm, R. M. 1973. ‘Parts as Essential to Their Wholes’, Review of Metaphysics 26: 581–603.Google Scholar
Cicero 2006. On Academic Scepticism. Translated, with introduction and notes, by C. Brittain. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Cignoli, R., D’Ottaviano, I. M. L. and Mundici, D. 1999. Algebraic Foundations of Many-Valued Reasoning. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Cobreros, P. 2008. ‘Supervaluationism and Logical Consequence: A Third Way’, Studia Logica 90: 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobreros, P. 2011a. ‘Paraconsistent Vagueness: A Positive Argument’, Synthese 183: 211–27.Google Scholar
Cobreros, P. 2011b. ‘Supervaluationism and Fara’s Argument Concerning Higher-Order Vagueness’, in Égré, P. and Klinedinst, N. (eds.), Vagueness and Language Use. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 207–21.Google Scholar
Cobreros, P. 2011c. ‘Varzi on Supervaluationism and Logical Consequence’, Mind 120: 833–43.Google Scholar
Cobreros, P. 2013. ‘Vagueness: Subvaluationism’, Philosophy Compass 8: 472–85.Google Scholar
Cobreros, P., Égré, P., Ripley, D. and van Rooij, R. 2012. ‘Tolerant, Classical, Strict’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 41: 347–85.Google Scholar
Cobreros, P. and Tranchini, L. 2014. ‘Supervaluationism: Truth, Value and Degree Functionality’, Thought 3: 133–44.Google Scholar
Colyvan, M. 2009. ‘Vagueness and Truth’, in Dyke, H. (ed.), From Truth to Reality: New Essays in Logic and Metaphysics. London: Routledge, pp. 29–40.Google Scholar
Constantinescu, C. 2014. ‘Moral Vagueness: A Dilemma for Non-Naturalism’, Oxford Studies in Metaethics 9: 152–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, R. T. 2013. Paradoxes. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Corner, A., Hahn, U. and Oaksford, M. 2011. ‘The Psychological Mechanism of the Slippery Slope Argument’, Journal of Memory and Language 64: 133–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cresswell, M. J. 1976. ‘The Semantics of Degree’, in Partee, B. (ed.), Montague Grammar. New York: Academic Press, pp. 261–92.Google Scholar
Cruse, D. A. 1986. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Curry, H. B. 1942. ‘The Inconsistency of Certain Formal Logics’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 7: 115–7.Google Scholar
Dempster, A. 1967. ‘Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping’, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 38: 325–39.Google Scholar
DeRose, K. 1999. ‘Introduction: Responding to Skepticism’. In DeRose, K. and Warfield, T. (eds.), Skepticism: A Contemporary Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Dietz, R. and Moruzzi, S. (eds.) 2010. Cuts and Clouds: Essays on the Nature and Logic of Vagueness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laertius, Diogenes 1925. Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Edited with an English translation by R. D. Hicks. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Donnelly, M. 2011. ‘Endurantist and Perdurantist Accounts of Persistence’, Philosophical Studies 154: 27–51.Google Scholar
Dorr, C., Goodman, J. and Hawthorne, J. 2014. ‘Knowing against the Odds’, Philosophical Studies 170: 277–87.Google Scholar
Dorr, C. and Hawthorne, J. 2014. ‘Semantic Plasticity and Speech Reports’, The Philosophical Review 123: 281–338.Google Scholar
Douven, I. and Decock, L. 2017. ‘What Verities May Be’, Mind 126: 386–428.Google Scholar
Douven, I., Decock, L., Dietz, R. and Égré, P. 2013. ‘Vagueness: A Conceptual Spaces Approach’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 42: 137–60.Google Scholar
Douven, I., Wenmackers, S., Jraissati, Y. and Decock, L. 2016. ‘Measuring Graded Membership: The Case of Color’, Cognitive Science 41: 686–722.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. A. E. 1959. ‘Truth’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 59: 141–62.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. A. E. 1975. ‘Wang’s Paradox’, Synthese 30: 301–24.Google Scholar
Dzhafarov, E. N. and Dzhafarov, D. D. 2012. ‘The Sorites Paradox: A Behavioral Approach’, in Rudolph, L. (ed.), Qualitative Mathematics for the Social Sciences: Mathematical Models for Research on Cultural Dynamics. London: Routledge, pp. 105–36.Google Scholar
Edgington, D. 1997. ‘Vagueness by Degrees’, in Keefe, R. and Smith, P. (eds.), Vagueness: A Reader. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 294–316.Google Scholar
Égré, P. 2009. ‘Soritical Series and Fisher Series’, in Hieke, A. and Leitgeb, H. (eds.), Reduction: Between the Mind and the Brain. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, pp. 91–115.Google Scholar
Égré, P. 2011a. ‘Perceptual Ambiguity and the Sorites’, in Nouwen, R., van Rooij, R., Sauerland, U. and Schmitz, H. (eds.), Vagueness in Communication. Berlin: Springer, pp. 64–90.Google Scholar
Égré, P. 2011b. ‘Review of Nicholas JJ Smith, Vagueness and Degrees of Truth’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89: 177–80.Google Scholar
Égré, P. 2015. ‘Borderline Cases, Incompatibilism and Plurivaluationism’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90: 457–66.Google Scholar
Égré, P. 2016. ‘Vague Judgment: A Probabilistic Account’, Synthese 194: 3837–65.Google Scholar
Égré, P. and Barberousse, A. 2014. ‘Borel on the Heap’, Erkenntnis 79: 1043–79.Google Scholar
Égré, P., de Gardelle, V. and Ripley, D. 2013. ‘Vagueness and Order Effects in Color Categorization’, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 22: 391–420.Google Scholar
Égré, P. and Klinedinst, N. (eds.) 2011. Vagueness and Language Use. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Égré, P. and Zehr, J. 2016. ‘Are Gaps Preferred to Gluts? A Closer Look at Borderline Contradictions’, in Castroviejo, E., Sassoon, G. W. and McNally, L. (eds.), The Semantics of Gradability, Vagueness, and Scale Structure. Experimental Perspectives. Berlin: Springer, pp. 25–58.Google Scholar
Eklund, M. 2002. ‘Inconsistent Languages’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64: 251–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eklund, M. 2005. ‘What Vagueness Consists in’, Philosophical Studies 125: 27–60.Google Scholar
Eklund, M. 2007. ‘Meaning-Constitutivity’, Inquiry 50: 559–74.Google Scholar
Eklund, M. 2010a. ‘Review of Timothy Williamson, The Philosophy of Philosophy’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88: 752–4.Google Scholar
Eklund, M. 2010b. ‘Vagueness and Second-Level Indeterminacy’, in Dietz, R. and Moruzzi, S. (eds.), Cuts and Clouds: Essays on the Nature and Logic of Vagueness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 63–76.Google Scholar
Eklund, M. 2013. ‘Metaphysical Vagueness and Metaphysical Indeterminacy’, Metaphysica 14: 165–79.Google Scholar
Eklund, M. 2017. Choosing Normative Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elson, L. 2014. ‘Heaps and Chains: Is the Chaining Argument for Parity a Sorites?’, Ethics 124: 557–71.Google Scholar
Elson, L. 2016. ‘Tenenbaum and Raffman on Vague Projects, the Self-Torturer, and the Sorites’, Ethics 126: 474–88.Google Scholar
Endicott, T. 2001. Vagueness in Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Enoch, D. 2007. ‘Epistemicism and Nihilism about Vagueness: What Is the Difference?’, Philosophical Studies 133: 285–311.Google Scholar
Enoch, D. 2017. ‘Non-Naturalistic Realism in Metaethics’ in McPherson, T. and Plunkett, D. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. New York: Routledge, pp. 29–42.Google Scholar
Fara, D. G. 2000. ‘Shifting Sands: An Interest-Relative Theory of Vagueness’, Philosophical Topics 28: 45–81.Google Scholar
Fara, D. G. 2001. ‘Phenomenal Continua and the Sorites’, Mind 110: 905–35.Google Scholar
Fara, D. G. 2003. ‘Gap Principles, Penumbral Consequence and Infinitely Higher-Order Vagueness’, in Beall, JC (ed.), Liars and Heaps: New Essays on Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 195–221.Google Scholar
Fara, D. G. 2008. ‘Profiling Interest Relativity’, Analysis 68: 326–35.Google Scholar
Fara, D. G. 2010. ‘Scope Confusions and Unsatisfiable Disjuncts: Two Problems for Supervaluationism’, in Dietz, R. and Moruzzi, S. (eds.), Cuts and Clouds: Essays on the Nature and Logic of Vagueness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 373–82.Google Scholar
Fara, D. G. 2011. ‘Truth in a Region’, in Égré, P. and Klinedinst, N. (eds.), Vagueness and Language Use. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 222–48.Google Scholar
Fara, D. G. and Williamson, T. (eds.) 2002. Vagueness. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Fechner, G. T. 1860. Elemente der Psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.Google Scholar
Fermüller, C. G. and Hájek, P. 2011. ‘A Conversation about Fuzzy Logic and Vagueness’, in Cintula, P., Fermüller, C. G. and Godo, L. (eds.), Understanding Vagueness. Logical, Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. London: College Publications, pp. 395–406.Google Scholar
Field, H. 1973. ‘Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference’, The Journal of Philosophy 70: 462–81.Google Scholar
Field, H. 2003a. ‘No Fact of the Matter’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81: 457–80.Google Scholar
Field, H. 2003b. ‘The Semantic Paradoxes and the Paradoxes of Vagueness’, in Beall, JC (ed.), Liars and Heaps: New Essays on Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 262–311.Google Scholar
Field, H. 2008. Saving Truth from Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Field, H. 2010. ‘This Magic Moment: Horwich on the Boundaries of Vague Terms’, in Dietz, R. and Moruzzi, S. (eds.), Cuts and Clouds: Essays on the Nature and Logic of Vagueness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 200–8.Google Scholar
Fine, K. 1975. ‘Vagueness, Truth and Logic’, Synthese 30: 265–300.Google Scholar
Fisher, G. 1967. ‘Measuring Ambiguity’, The American Journal of Psychology 80: 541–57.Google Scholar
Forbes, G. A. 1983. ‘Thisness and Vagueness’, Synthese 54: 235–59.Google Scholar
Forbes, G. A. 1984. ‘Two Solutions to Chisholm’s Paradox’, Philosophical Studies 46: 171–87.Google Scholar
Forbes, G. A. 1986. ‘In Defense of Absolute Essentialism’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 11: 3–31.Google Scholar
Francez, I. and Koontz-Garboden, A. 2015. ‘Semantic Variation and the Grammar of Property Concepts’, Language 91: 533–63.Google Scholar
Frankowski, S. 2004. ‘Formalization of Plausible Inference’, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 33: 41–52.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1983. ‘Stoics and Skeptics on Clear and Distinct Impressions’, in Burnyeat, M. F. (ed.), The Skeptical Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 65–93. (Reprinted in M. Frede (1987), pp. 151–76. Page references are to the reprint.)Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1987. Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Frege, G. 1879. Begriffsschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Halle: Nebert.Google Scholar
Frege, G. 1903. Grundgesetze der Arithmetik. Vol. 2. Jena: Pohle.Google Scholar
Frege, G. 1918. ‘Der Gedanke: Eine logische Untersuchung’, Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 1: 58–77.Google Scholar
Gabbay, D. 1985. ‘Theoretical Foundations for Non-Monotonic Reasoning in Expert Systems’, in Apt, K. (ed.), Logics and Models of Concurrent Systems. Berlin: Springer, pp. 439–57.Google Scholar
Galen 1985. Three Treatises on the Nature of Science. Translated by R. Walzer and M. Frede. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Gallois, A. 2004. ‘Comments on Ted Sider: Four Dimensionalism’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68: 648–57.Google Scholar
Gauker, C. 1999. ‘Deflationism and Logic’, Facta Philosophica 1: 167–99.Google Scholar
Gentzen, G. 1934. ‘Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen I’, Mathematische Zeitschrift 39: 176–210.Google Scholar
Gilmore, C. 2006. ‘Where in the Relativistic World Are We?’, Philosophical Perspectives 20: 199–236.Google Scholar
Goguen, J. A. 1969. ‘The Logic of Inexact Concepts’, Synthese 19: 325–73.Google Scholar
Gómez-Torrente, M. 2002. ‘Vagueness and Margin for Error Principles’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64: 107–25.Google Scholar
Grano, T. and Davis, S. 2018. ‘Universal Markedness in Gradable Adjectives Revisited: The Morpho-Semantics of the Positive Form in Arabic’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 36: 131–47.Google Scholar
Grinsell, T. W. 2017. ‘Semantic Indecision’. PhD thesis, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. 1993a. ‘A Critique of Deflationism’, Philosophical Topics 21: 57–81.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. 1993b. ‘Minimalism’, Philosophical Perspectives 7: 459–69.Google Scholar
Hahn, U. and Oaksford, M. 2006. ‘A Bayesian Approach to Informal Argument Fallacies’, Synthese 152: 207–36.Google Scholar
Hájek, P. 1998. Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Hájek, P. 1999. ‘Ten Questions and One Problem on Fuzzy Logic’, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 98: 157–65.Google Scholar
Hájek, P. and Novák, V. 2003. ‘The Sorites Paradox and Fuzzy Logic’, International Journal of General Systems 32: 373–83.Google Scholar
Hampton, J. A. 1998. ‘Similarity-Based Categorization and Fuzziness of Natural Categories’, Cognition 65: 137–65.Google Scholar
Hampton, J. A. 2007. ‘Typicality, Graded Membership, and Vagueness’, Cognitive Science 31: 355–84.Google Scholar
Hampton, J. A., Estes, Z., Botbol, J. and Jaunbocus, Y. 2012. ‘Contrast and Assimilation in Simultaneous Categorization’, ms.Google Scholar
Hampton, J. A., Estes, Z. and Simmons, C. L. 2005. ‘Comparison and Contrast in Perceptual Categorization’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31: 1459–76.Google Scholar
Hardin, L. 1988. ‘Phenomenal Colors and Sorites’, Noûs 22: 213–34.Google Scholar
Harnad, S. 1987. ‘Psychophysical and Cognitive Aspects of Categorical Perception: A Critical Overview’, in Harnad, S. (ed.), Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Hawley, K. 2002. ‘Vagueness and Existence’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102: 125–40.Google Scholar
Hawley, K. 2004. ‘Borderline Simple or Extremely Simple’, The Monist 87: 385–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawthorne, J. 2008. ‘Three-Dimensionalism’, in Hawthorne, J., Metaphysical Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 85–110.Google Scholar
Hedman, S. 2004. A First Course in Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1892. Lectures on the History of Philosophy. Translated by Haldane, E. S. and Simson, F. H.. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 2010. The Science of Logic. Translated and edited by G. di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heim, I. 2006. ‘“Little”‘, Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 16: 17–34.Google Scholar
Heller, M. 1988. ‘Vagueness and the Standard Ontology’, Noûs 22: 109–31.Google Scholar
Heller, M. 1990. The Ontology of Physical Objects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hinnion, R. and Libert, T. 2003. ‘Positive Abstraction and Extensionality’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 68: 828–36.Google Scholar
Hodes, H. 1984. ‘Logicism and the Ontological Commitments of Arithmetic’, The Journal of Philosophy 81: 123–49.Google Scholar
Horgan, T. 1994. ‘Robust Vagueness and the Forced-March Sorites Paradox’, Philosophical Perspectives 8: 159–88.Google Scholar
Horwich, P. 1997. ‘The Nature of Vagueness’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57: 929–36.Google Scholar
Horwich, P. 1998a. Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horwich, P. 1998b. Truth. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horwich, P. 2001. ‘A Defense of Minimalism’, Synthese 126: 149–65.Google Scholar
Horwich, P. 2005. Reflections on Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horwich, P. 2010a. ‘A Minimalist Critique of Tarski’, in Horwich, P., Truth-Meaning-Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 79–97.Google Scholar
Horwich, P. 2010b. Truth-Meaning-Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, H. 2002. ‘Review of Four-Dimensionalism’, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (http://ndpr.nd.edu/review.cfm?id=1135).Google Scholar
Hughes, G. E. and Cresswell, M. J. 1996. A New Introduction to Modal Logic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Humberstone, L. 2011. The Connectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1739. A Treatise of Human Nature. London: John Noon.Google Scholar
Hyde, D. 1997.’From Heaps and Gaps to Heaps of Gluts’, Mind 106: 641–60.Google Scholar
Hyde, D. 2007. Vagueness, Logic and Ontology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hyde, D. 2010. ‘The Prospects of a Paraconsistent Response to Vagueness’, in Dietz, R. and Moruzzi, S. (eds.), Cuts and Clouds: Essays on the Nature and Logic of Vagueness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 385–405.Google Scholar
Hyde, D. 2011. ‘Sorites Paradox’, in E. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/sorites-paradox/).Google Scholar
Hyde, D. 2013. ‘Are the Sorites and Liar Paradox of a Kind?’, in Berto, F., Mares, E. and Tanaka, K. (eds.), Paraconsistency: Logic and Applications. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 349–66.Google Scholar
Hyde, D. and Colyvan, M. 2008. ‘Paraconsistent Vagueness: Why Not?’, The Australasian Journal of Logic 6: 107–21.Google Scholar
Jaśkowski, S. 1948. ‘Rachunek zdań dla systemów dedukcyjnych sprzecznych’, Studia Societatis Scientiarum Torunensis 1: 55–77.Google Scholar
Jones, N. 2015. ‘Verities and Truth-Values’, forthcoming in Walters, L. and Hawthorne, J. (eds.), Conditionals, Probability, and Paradox. Themes from the Philosophy of Dorothy Edgington. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kalmus, H. 1979. ‘Dependence of Colour Naming and Monochromator Setting on the Direction of Preceding Changes in Wavelength’, British Journal of Physiological Optics 32: 1–9.Google Scholar
Kamp, H. 1975. ‘Two Theories about Adjectives’, in Keenan, E. (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 123–55.Google Scholar
Kamp, H. 1981. ‘The Paradox of the Heap’, in Mönnich, U. (ed.), Aspects of Philosophical Logic. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 225–77.Google Scholar
Kamp, H. 2013. Meaning and the Dynamics of Interpretation: Selected Papers of Hans Kamp. Edited by von Heusinger, K. and ter Meulen, A.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kamp, H. and Sassoon, G. W. 2016. ‘Vagueness’, in Aloni, M. and Dekker, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 389–441.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1992. Lectures on Logic. Translated and edited by J. M. Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kearns, S. and Magidor, O. 2008. ‘Epistemicism about Vagueness and Meta-Linguistic Safety’, Philosophical Perspectives 22: 277–304.Google Scholar
Kearns, S. and Magidor, O. 2012. ‘Semantic Sovereignty’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58: 322–50.Google Scholar
Keefe, R. 1998. ‘Vagueness by Numbers’, Mind 107: 427–41.Google Scholar
Keefe, R. 2000. Theories of Vagueness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keefe, R. 2007. ‘Vagueness without Context Change’, Mind 116: 275–92.Google Scholar
Keefe, R. and Smith, P. 1997a. ‘Introduction’, in Keefe, R. and Smith, P. (eds.), Vagueness: A Reader. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–57.Google Scholar
Keefe, R. and Smith, P. (eds.) 1997b. Vagueness: A Reader. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. 1999. Projecting the Adjective: The Syntax and Semantics of Gradability and Comparison. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. 2007a. ‘Modes of Comparison’, in Elliott, M., Kirby, J., Sawada, O., Staraki, E. and Yoon, S. (eds.), Papers from the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society Volume 1: The Main Session. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 139–63.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. 2007b. ‘Vagueness and Grammar: The Semantics of Relative and Absolute Gradable Adjectives’, Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 1–45.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. 2011. ‘Vagueness and Comparison’, in Égré, P. and Klinedinst, N. (eds.), Vagueness and Language Use. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 73–97.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. and Levin, B. 2008. ‘Measure of Change: The Adjectival Core of Degree Achievements’, in McNally, L. and Kennedy, C. (eds.), Adjectives and Adverbs: Syntax, Semantics and Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 156–82.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. and McNally, L. 2005. ‘Scale Structure and the Semantic Typology of Gradable Predicates’, Language 81: 345–81.Google Scholar
Klecha, P. 2018. ‘On Unidirectionality in Precisification’, Linguistics and Philosophy 41: 87–124.Google Scholar
Kleene, S. C. 1938. ‘On a Notation for Ordinal Numbers’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 3: 150–5.Google Scholar
Klein, E. 1980. ‘A Semantics for Positive and Comparative Adjectives’, Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 1–45.Google Scholar
Klein, E. 1991. ‘Comparatives’, in von Stechow, A. and Wunderlich, D. (eds.), Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung (Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research). Berlin: W. de Gruyter, pp. 673–91.Google Scholar
Kneale, W. and Kneale, M. 1962. The Development of Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Korman, D. Z. 2010. ‘The Argument from Vagueness’, Philosophy Compass 5: 891–901.Google Scholar
Korman, D. Z. 2015. Objects: Nothing Out of the Ordinary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Körner, S. 1959. ‘On Determinables and Resemblance’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 33: 125–40.Google Scholar
Koslicki, K. 2003. ‘The Crooked Path from Vagueness to Four Dimensionalism’, Philosophical Studies 114: 107–34.Google Scholar
Koslicki, K. 2014. ‘Mereological Sums and Singular Terms’, in Kleinschmidt, S. (ed.), Mereology and Location. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 209–35.Google Scholar
Krifka, M. 2007. ‘Approximate Interpretation of Number Words: A Case for Strategic Interpretation’, in Bouma, G., Krämer, I. and Zwarts, J. (eds.), Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, pp. 111–26.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. A. 1975. ‘Outline of a Theory of Truth’, The Journal of Philosophy 72: 690–716.Google Scholar
Kurtsal Steen, İ. 2010. ‘Three-Dimensionalist’s Semantic Solution to Diachronic Vagueness’, Philosophical Studies 115: 79–96.Google Scholar
Kurtsal Steen, İ. 2014. ‘Almost-Ontology: Why Epistemicism Cannot Help Us Avoid Unrestricted Composition or Diachronic Plenitude’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 95: 130–9.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1973. ‘Hedges: A Study on Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 458–508.Google Scholar
Lasersohn, P. 1999. ‘Pragmatic Halos’, Language 75: 522–51.Google Scholar
Lasonen-Aarnio, M. 2008. ‘Single Premise Deduction and Risk’, Philosophical Studies 141: 157–73.Google Scholar
Lassiter, D. and Goodman, N. D. 2014. ‘Context, Scale Structure, and Statistics in the Interpretation of Positive-Form Adjectives’, Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 23: 587–610.Google Scholar
Lassiter, D. and Goodman, N. D. 2017. ‘Adjectival Vagueness in a Bayesian Model of Interpretation’, Synthese 194: 3801–36.Google Scholar
Leffel, T., Kennedy, C. and Xiang, M. 2016. ‘Imprecision Is Pragmatic: Evidence from Referential Processing’, Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 26: 836–54.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1982. New Essays on Human Understanding. Translated and edited by P. Remnant and J. Bennett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1989. Philosophical Essays. Translated by R. Ariew and D. Garber. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 2001. The Labyrinth of the Continuum: Writings on the Continuum Problem, 1672–1686. Translated, edited and with an introduction by R. T. W. Arthur. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Leslie, S. J. 2011. ‘Essence, Plenitude and Paradox’, Philosophical Perspectives 25: 277–96.Google Scholar
Levey, S. 2002. ‘Leibniz and the Sorites’, The Leibniz Review 12: 25–49.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. K. 1970a. ‘General Semantics’, Synthese 22: 18–67.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. K. 1970b. ‘How to Define Theoretical Terms’, The Journal of Philosophy 67: 427–46.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. K. 1972. ‘Psychophysical and Theoretical Identifications’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50: 249–58.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. K. 1979. ‘Scorekeeping in a Language Game’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339–59.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. K. 1983. ‘New Work for a Theory of Universals’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61: 343–77.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. K. 1984. ‘Putnam’s Paradox’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62: 221–36.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. K. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. K. 1997. ‘Naming the Colours’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75: 325–42.Google Scholar
Lewy, C. 1958. ‘Entailment’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 32: 123–42.Google Scholar
Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., and Griffith, B. C. 1957. ‘The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries’, Journal of Experimental Psychology 54: 358–68.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1690. An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding. London: Thomas Basset.Google Scholar
Lode, E. 1999. ‘Slippery Slope Arguments and Legal Reasoning’, California Law Review 87: 1469–543.Google Scholar
López de Sa, D. 2006. ‘Is “Everything” Precise?’, Dialectica 60: 397–409.Google Scholar
López de Sa, D. and Zardini, E. 2007. ‘Truthmakers, Knowledge and Paradox’, Analysis 67: 242–50.Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J. 2013. ‘Ontological Vagueness, Existence Monism and Metaphysical Realism’, Metaphysica 14: 265–74.Google Scholar
Luce, R. D. 1956. ‘Semiorders and a Theory of Utility Discrimination’, Econometrica, Journal of the Econometric Society 24: 178–91.Google Scholar
Luce, R. D. 1959. Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ludlow, P. 1989. ‘Implicit Comparison Classes’, Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 519–33.Google Scholar
Ludwig, K. and Ray, G. 2002. ‘Vagueness and the Sorites Paradox’, Philosophical Perspectives 16: 419–61.Google Scholar
Łukasiewicz, J. 1920. ‘O logice trójwartościowej’, Ruch Filozoficzny 5: 170–1.Google Scholar
Łukasiewicz, J. and Tarski, A. 1930. ‘Untersuchungen über den Aussagenkalkül’, Comptes rendus des séances de la Société des Sciences et des Lettres de Varsovie 23: 30–50.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, J. 2009. ‘Nonindexical Contextualism’, Synthese 166: 231–50.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, J. 2010. ‘Fuzzy Epistemicism’, in Dietz, R. and Moruzzi, S. (eds.), Cuts and Clouds: Essays on the Nature and Logic of Vagueness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 438–63.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, J. 2016. ‘Vagueness as Indecision’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 90: 255–83.Google Scholar
Machina, K. F. 1976. ‘Truth, Belief, and Vagueness’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 5: 47–78.Google Scholar
Macmillan, N. A. 1987. ‘Beyond the Categorical/Continuous Distinction: A Psychophysical Approach to Processing Modes’, in Harnad, S. (ed.), Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 53–85.Google Scholar
Magidor, O. 2012. ‘Strict Finitism and the Happy Sorites’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 41: 471–91.Google Scholar
Magidor, O. 2016. ‘Epistemicism, Distribution, and the Argument from Vagueness’, Noûs 52: 144–70.Google Scholar
Mahtani, A. 2004. ‘The Instability of Vague Terms’, The Philosophical Quarterly 54: 570–6.Google Scholar
Makinson, D. 1965. ‘The Paradox of the Preface’, Analysis 25: 205–7.Google Scholar
Malinowski, G. 1990. ‘Q-Consequence Operation’, Reports on Mathematical Logic 24: 49–59.Google Scholar
Malt, B. C. 1990. ‘Features and Beliefs in the Mental Representation of Categories’, Journal of Memory and Language 29: 289–315.Google Scholar
Mares, E. and Paoli, F. 2014. ‘Logical Consequence and the Paradoxes’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 43: 439–69.Google Scholar
Markosian, N. 1998. ‘Brutal Composition’, Philosophical Studies 92: 211–49.Google Scholar
Markosian, N. 2008. ‘Restricted Composition’, in Sider, T., Hawthorne, J. and Zimmerman, D. W. (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 341–62.Google Scholar
McCloskey, M. E. and Glucksberg, S. 1978. ‘Natural Categories: Well Defined or Fuzzy Sets?’, Memory & Cognition 6: 462–72.Google Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, S. 1973. ‘Comparative Constructions in English: A Syntactic and Semantic Analysis’. PhD thesis, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
McGee, V. 1989. ‘Applying Kripke’s Theory of Truth’, The Journal of Philosophy 86: 530–9.Google Scholar
McGee, V. 1991. Truth, Vagueness, and Paradox. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
McGee, V. 1992. ‘Maximal Consistent Sets of Instances of Tarski’s Schema (T)’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 21: 235–41.Google Scholar
McGee, V. and McLaughlin, B. 2004. ‘Logical Commitment and Semantic Indeterminacy: A Reply to Williamson’, Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 123–36.Google Scholar
McGill, V. J. and Parry, W. T. 1948. ‘The Unity of Opposites: A Dialectical Principle’, Science and Society 12: 418–44.Google Scholar
Mehlberg, H. 1958. The Reach of Science. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Merricks, T. 2001a. Objects and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Merricks, T. 2001b. ‘Varieties of Vagueness’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62: 145–57.Google Scholar
Merricks, T. 2005. ‘Composition and Vagueness’, Mind 114: 615–67.Google Scholar
Miller, K. 2008. ‘Endurantism, Diachronic Vagueness, and the Problem of the Many’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89: 242–53.Google Scholar
Misiuna, K. 2010. ‘A Certain Consequence Relation for Solving Paradoxes of Vagueness’, Logique et Analyse 53: 25–50.Google Scholar
Moline, J. 1969. ‘Aristotle, Eubulides and the Sorites’, Mind 78: 393–407.Google Scholar
Mott, P. 1994. ‘On the Intuitionistic Solution of the Sorites Paradox’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 75:133–50.Google Scholar
Muller, R. 1985. Les Mégariques: Fragments et témoignages. Traduits et commentés. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Navarro, P. and Rodríguez, J. 2014. Deontic Logic and Legal Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nebel, J. 2017. ‘The Good, the Bad, and the Transitivity of Better than’, forthcoming in Noûs.Google Scholar
Negri, S. 2011. ‘Proof Theory for Modal Logic’, Philosophy Compass 6: 523–38.Google Scholar
Nolan, D. 2006. ‘Vagueness, Multiplicity and Parts’, Noûs 40: 716–37.Google Scholar
Nolan, D. 2014. ‘Balls and All’, in Kleinschmidt, S. (ed.), Mereology and Location. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 91–116.Google Scholar
Novák, V. and Dvořák, A. 2011. ‘Fuzzy Logic: A Powerful Tool for Modelling Vagueness’, ms.Google Scholar
Oms, S. 2010. ‘Truth-Functional and Penumbral Intuitions’, Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 25: 137–47.Google Scholar
Oms, S. 2017. ‘Articulation and Liars’, Disputatio 9: 383–99.Google Scholar
Oms, S. 2018a. ‘Conceivability, Minimalism and the Generalization Problem’, forthcoming in Dialogue.Google Scholar
Oms, S. 2018b. ‘Minimalism, Supervaluations and Fixed Points’, forthcoming in Synthese.Google Scholar
Oms, S. and Zardini, E. 2017. ‘Inclosure and Intolerance’, ms.Google Scholar
O’Regan, J. K. 2001. ‘Thoughts on Change Blindness’, in Jenkin, M. and Harris, L. (eds.), Vision and Attention. Berlin: Springer, pp. 281–301.Google Scholar
O’Regan, J. K., Rensink, R. A. and Clark, J. J. 1999. ‘Change-Blindness as a Result of “Mudsplashes”‘, Nature 398: 34.Google Scholar
Osherson, D. N. and Smith, E. E. 1981. ‘On the Adequacy of Prototype Theory as a Theory of Concepts’, Cognition 9: 35–58.Google Scholar
Pagin, P. 2010. ‘Vagueness and Domain Restriction’, in Égré, P. and Klinedinst, N. (eds.), Vagueness and Language Use. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 283–307.Google Scholar
Paoli, F. 2003. ‘A Really Fuzzy Approach to the Sorites Paradox’, Synthese 134: 363–87.Google Scholar
Paoli, F. 2007. ‘Implicational Paradoxes and the Meaning of Logical Constants’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85: 553–79.Google Scholar
Paoli, F. 2018. ‘Truth Degrees, Closeness, and the Sorites’, forthcoming in Bueno, O. and Abasnezhad, A. (eds.), On the Sorites Paradox. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. A. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peacocke, C. A. B. 1981. ‘Are Vague Predicates Incoherent?’, Synthese 46: 121–41.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. 1902. ‘Sorites’, in Baldwin, J. M. (ed.), Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pelofi, C., de Gardelle, V., Égré, P. and Pressnitzer, D. 2017. ‘Interindividual Variability in Auditory Scene Analysis Revealed by Confidence Judgments’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 372: 1–12.Google Scholar
Peña, L. 1984. ‘Identity, Fuzziness and Noncontradiction’, Noûs 18: 227–59.Google Scholar
Pinkal, M. 1995. Logic and Lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Plekhanov, G. 1941. Fundamental Problems of Marxism. Edited by Ryazanov, D.. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Potts, C. 2008. ‘Interpretive Economy, Schelling Points, and Evolutionary Stability’, ms.Google Scholar
Priest, G. 1994. ‘The Structure of the Paradoxes of Self-Reference’, Mind 103: 25–34.Google Scholar
Priest, G. 1995. Beyond the Limits of Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (2002. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.)Google Scholar
Priest, G. 2000. ‘On the Principle of Uniform Solution: A Reply to Smith’, Mind 109: 123–6.Google Scholar
Priest, G. 2002. ‘Paraconsistent Logic’, in Gabbay, D. and Guenthner, F. (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Vol. 6. 2nd edn. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 287–393.Google Scholar
Priest, G. 2003. ‘A Site for Sorites’, in Beall, JC (ed.), Liars and Heaps: New Essays on Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 9–23.Google Scholar
Priest, G. 2006. In Contradiction. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Priest, G. 2008. An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Priest, G. 2010a. ‘Inclosures, Vagueness, and Self-Reference’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51: 69–84.Google Scholar
Priest, G. 2010b. ‘Non-Transitive Identity’, in Dietz, R. and Moruzzi, S. (eds.), Cuts and Clouds: Essays on the Nature and Logic of Vagueness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 406–16.Google Scholar
Priest, G. 2014. One. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Priest, G. 2017. ‘What If : The Exploration of an Idea’, The Australasian Journal of Logic 14: 54–127.Google Scholar
Priest, G. and Routley, R. 1989. ‘Applications of Paraconsistent Logic’, in Priest, G., Routley, R. and Norman, J. (eds.), Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent. Munich: Philosophia Verlag, pp. 367–93.Google Scholar
Pummer, T. 2017. ‘Spectrum Arguments and Hypersensitivity’, Philosophical Studies 7: 1729–44.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1975. ‘The Meaning of “Meaning”‘, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7: 131–93.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1983. ‘Vagueness and Alternative Logic’, Erkenntnis 19: 297–314.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1985. ‘A Quick Read Is a Wrong Wright’, Analysis 45: 203.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1991. ‘Replies and Comments’, Erkenntnis 34: 401–24.Google Scholar
Qing, C. and Franke, M. 2014a. ‘Gradable Adjectives, Vagueness, and Optimal Language Use: A Speaker-Oriented Model’, Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 24: 23–41.Google Scholar
Qing, C. and Franke, M. 2014b. ‘Meaning and Use of Gradable Adjectives: Formal Modeling Meets Empirical Data’, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 36: 1204–9.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1970. ‘Natural Kinds’, in Rescher, N. (ed.), Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 5–23.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1986. Philosophy of Logic. 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, W. 1990. ‘The Puzzle of the Self-Torturer’, Philosophical Studies 59: 79–90.Google Scholar
Raatikainen, P. 2005. ‘On Horwich’s Way Out’, Analysis 65: 175–7.Google Scholar
Rachels, S. 1993. ‘A Theory of Beneficence’. BA thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Rachels, S. 1998. ‘Counterexamples to the Transitivity of Better than’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76: 71–83.Google Scholar
Raffman, D. 1994. ‘Vagueness without Paradox’, The Philosophical Review 103: 41–74.Google Scholar
Raffman, D. 1996. ‘Vagueness and Context-Relativity’, Philosophical Studies 81: 175–92.Google Scholar
Raffman, D. 2005a. ‘How to Understand Contextualism about Vagueness: Reply to Stanley’, Analysis 65: 244–8.Google Scholar
Raffman, D. 2005b. ‘Borderline Cases and Bivalence’, The Philosophical Review 114: 1–31.Google Scholar
Raffman, D. 2011. ‘Vagueness and Observationality’, in Ronzitti, G. (ed.), Vagueness: A Guide. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 107–21.Google Scholar
Raffman, D. 2014. Unruly Words: A Study of Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raffman, D. 2015. ‘Responses to Discussants’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90: 483–501.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rea, G. 1989. ‘Degrees of Truth versus Intuitionism’, Analysis 49: 31–2.Google Scholar
Read, S. L. 1994. ‘Formal and Material Consequence’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 23: 247–65.Google Scholar
Read, S. L. 2002. ‘The Liar Paradox from John Buridan Back to Thomas Bradwardine’, Vivarium 40: 189–218.Google Scholar
Read, S. L. and Wright, C. 1985. ‘Hairier than Putnam Thought’, Analysis 45: 56–8.Google Scholar
Repp, B. H. 1984. ‘Categorical Perception: Issues, Methods, Findings’, Speech and Language: Advances in Basic Research and Practice 10: 243–335.Google Scholar
Restall, G. 2005. ‘Minimalists about Truth Can (and Should) Be Epistemicists, and It Helps if They Are Revision Theorists Too’, in Beall, JC and Armour-Garb, B. (eds.), Deflationism and Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 97–106.Google Scholar
Ridge, M. 2014. ‘Moral Non-Naturalism’, in E. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy(https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/moral-non-naturalism).Google Scholar
Ripley, D. 2005. ‘Sorting Out the Sorites’. MA thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Ripley, D. 2011. ‘Contradictions at the Borders’, in Nouwen, R., van Rooij, R., Schmitz, H. C. and Sauerland, U. (eds.), Vagueness and Communication. Berlin: Springer, pp. 169–88.Google Scholar
Ripley, D. 2012. ‘Conservatively Extending Classical Logic with Transparent Truth’, The Review of Symbolic Logic 5: 354–78.Google Scholar
Ripley, D. 2013. ‘Sorting Out the Sorites’, in Berto, F., Mares, E. and Tanaka, K. (eds.), Paraconsistency: Logic and Applications. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 329–48.Google Scholar
Rolf, B. 1984. ‘Sorites’, Synthese 58: 219–50.Google Scholar
Ronzitti, G. (ed.) 2011. Vagueness: A Guide. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. and Mervis, C. B. 1975. ‘Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories’, Cognitive Psychology 7: 573–605.Google Scholar
Rosenkranz, S. 2003. ‘Wright on Vagueness and Agnosticism’, Mind 112: 449–63.Google Scholar
Rotstein, C. and Winter, Y. 2004. ‘Total Adjectives vs. Partial Adjectives: Scale Structure and Higher-Order Modifiers’, Natural Language Semantics 12: 259–88.Google Scholar
Rusiecki, J. 1985. On Adjectives and Comparison in English. New York: Longman Linguistics Library.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1908. ‘Mathematical Logic as Based on the Theory of Types’, American Journal of Mathematics 30: 222–62.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1923. ‘Vagueness’, Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy 1: 84–92.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, M. 2009. Paradoxes. 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, M. 2015. ‘Vagueness and Semantic Methodology’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90: 475–82.Google Scholar
Salmon, N. 1986. ‘Modal Paradox: Parts and Counterparts, Points and Counterpoints’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 11: 75–120.Google Scholar
Sanford, D. H. 1975. ‘Borderline Logic’, American Philosophical Quarterly 12: 29–39.Google Scholar
Sanford, D. H. 1976. ‘Competing Semantics of Vagueness: Many Values versus Super-Truth’, Synthese 33: 195–210.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. 1944. ‘Grading: A Study in Semantics’, Philosophy of Science 11: 93–116.Google Scholar
Sassoon, G. W. 2009. ‘Restricted Quantification over Tastes’, in Aloni, M., Bastiaanse, H., de Jager, T. and Schulz, K. (eds.), Proceedings of the Amsterdam Colloquium. Berlin: Springer, pp. 163–72.Google Scholar
Sassoon, G. W. 2013. Vagueness, Gradability and Typicality: The Interpretation of Adjectives and Nouns. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Sawada, O. 2009. ‘Pragmatic Aspects of Implicit Comparison: An Economy Based Approach’, Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1079–103.Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, G. 2017. ‘Moral Realism’, in E. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/moral-realism).Google Scholar
Scharp, K. 2013. Replacing Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scharp, K. 2015. ‘Tolerance and the Multi-Range View of Vagueness’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90: 467–74.Google Scholar
Schechter, J. 2013. ‘Rational Self-Doubt and the Failure of Closure’, Philosophical Studies 163: 429–52.Google Scholar
Schiffer, S. 2016. ‘Vagueness and Indeterminacy: Responses to Dorothy Edgington, Hartry Field and Crispin Wright’ in Ostertag, G. (ed.), Meanings and Other Things. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 458–81.Google Scholar
Schindler, T. 2015. ‘A Disquotational Theory of Truth as Strong as Z2−−’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 44: 395–410.Google Scholar
Schindler, T. 2019. ‘A Note on Horwich’s Notion of Grounding’, forthcoming in Synthese.Google Scholar
Schoenfield, M. 2015. ‘Moral Vagueness Is Ontic Vagueness’, Ethics 126: 257–82.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. 1987. ‘Intuitionism and Sorites’, Analysis 47: 179–83.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. and Throop, W. 1991. ‘Intuitionism and Vagueness’, Erkenntnis 34: 347–56.Google Scholar
Schwarz, W. 2014. ‘Against Magnetism’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92: 17–36.Google Scholar
Segerberg, K. 1971. An Essay in Classical Modal Logic. Uppsala: Filosofiska Föreningen och Filosofiska Institutionen vid Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar
Sennet, A. M. 2012. ‘Semantic Plasticity and Epistemicism’, Philosophical Studies 161: 273–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serchuk, P., Hargreaves, I. and Zach, R. 2011. ‘Vagueness, Logic and Use: Four Experimental Studies on Vagueness’, Mind and Language 26: 540–73.Google Scholar
Seuren, P. A. 1973. ‘The Comparative’, in Kiefer, F. and Ruwet, N. (eds.), Generative Grammar in Europe. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 528–64.Google Scholar
Empiricus, Sextus 1933. Opera. Edited with an English translation by R. G. Bury. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Shafer, G. 1976. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shafer-Landau, R. 1994. ‘Ethical Disagreement, Ethical Objectivism, and Moral Indeterminacy’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54: 331–44.Google Scholar
Shafer-Landau, R. 1995. ‘Vagueness, Borderline Cases and Moral Realism’, American Philosophical Quarterly 32: 83–96.Google Scholar
Shafer-Landau, R. 2003. Moral Realism: A Defence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. 2003. ‘Vagueness and Conversation’, in Beall, JC (ed.), Liars and Heaps: New Essays on Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 39–72.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. 2006. Vagueness in Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. 2014. Varieties of Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sider, T. 2001. Four Dimensionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sider, T. 2003. ‘Against Vague Existence’, Philosophical Studies 114: 135–46.Google Scholar
Simons, P. 2013. ‘Vague Kinds and Biological Nominalism’, Metaphysica 14: 275–82.Google Scholar
Simons, D. J. and Levin, D. T. 1997. ‘Change Blindness’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1: 261–7.Google Scholar
Simplicius 2003. On Aristotle’s Categories 1–4. Translated by M. Chase. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Slaney, J. 2011. ‘A Logic for Vagueness’, The Australasian Journal of Logic 8: 100–34.Google Scholar
Smith, N. J. J. 2000. ‘The Principle of Uniform Solution (of the Paradoxes of Self-Reference)’, Mind 109: 117–22.Google Scholar
Smith, N. J. J. 2004. ‘Vagueness and Blurry Sets’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 33: 165–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N. J. J. 2008. Vagueness and Degrees of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, N. J. J. 2011. ‘Fuzzy Logic and Higher-Order Vagueness’, in Cintula, P., Fermüller, C. G. and Godo, L. (eds.), Understanding Vagueness. Logical, Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. London: College Publications, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Smith, N. J. J. 2015. ‘Undead Argument: The Truth-Functionality Objection to Fuzzy Theories of Vagueness’, Synthese 194: 3761–87.Google Scholar
Smith, N. J. J. 2019. ‘Consonance and Dissonance in Solutions to the Sorites’, forthcoming in Bueno, O. and Abasnezhad, A. (eds.), On the Sorites Paradox. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Smith, R. 1997. Aristotle, Topics I, VIII, and Selections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Soames, S. 1997. ‘The Truth about Deflationism’, Philosophical Issues 8: 1–44.Google Scholar
Soames, S. 1999. Understanding Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Soames, S. 2002. ‘Replies’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65: 429–52.Google Scholar
Soames, S. 2003. ‘Higher-Order Vagueness for Partially Defined Predicates’ in Beall, JC (ed.), Liars and Heaps: New Essays on Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 128–50.Google Scholar
Soames, S. 2007. ‘What Are Natural Kinds?’, Philosophical Topics 35: 329–42. (Reprinted in S. Soames (2014), pp. 265–80. Page references are to the reprint.)Google Scholar
Soames, S. 2009. ‘The Possibility of Partial Definition’, in Soames, S., Philosophical Essays. Vol. 2. Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp. 362–81.Google Scholar
Soames, S. 2014. Analytic Philosophy in America. And Other Historical and Contemporary Essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Solt, S. 2009. ‘The Semantics of Adjectives of Quantity’. PhD thesis, The City University of New York.Google Scholar
Sorensen, R. A. 1988. Blindspots. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sorensen, R. A. 2001. Vagueness and Contradiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sorensen, R. A. 2012. ‘Vagueness’, in E. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/vagueness/).Google Scholar
Stanley, J. 2003. ‘Context, Interest Relativity and the Sorites’, Analysis 63: 269–80.Google Scholar
Stanley, J. 2005. Knowledge and Practical Interests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stassen, L. 1985. Comparison and Universal Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stöttinger, E., Sepahvand, N. M., Danckert, J. and Anderson, B. 2016. ‘Assessing Perceptual Change with an Ambiguous Figures Task: Normative Data for 40 Standard Picture Sets’, Behavior Research Methods 48: 201–22.Google Scholar
Sweeney, P. and Zardini, E. 2011. ‘Vagueness and Practical Interest’, in Égré, P. and Klinedinst, N. (eds.), Vagueness and Language Use. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 249–82.Google Scholar
Syrett, K. 2007. ‘Learning about the Structure of Scales: Adverbial Modification and the Acquisition of the Semantics of Gradable Adjectives’. PhD thesis, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Syrett, K., Kennedy, C. and Lidz, J. 2010. ‘Meaning and Context in Children’s Understanding of Gradable Adjectives’, Journal of Semantics 27: 1–35.Google Scholar
Tappenden, J. 1993. ‘The Liar and Sorites Paradoxes. Toward a Unified Treatment’, The Journal of Philosophy 90: 551–77.Google Scholar
Tarski, A. 1969. ‘Truth and Proof’, Scientific American 220: 63–77.Google Scholar
Tarski, A. 1983. ‘The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages’, in Tarski, A., Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Translated by Woodger, J. H.. Edited, with introduction and index, by J. Corcoran. 2nd edn. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, pp. 152–278.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. and Burgess, A. 2015. ‘What in the World Is Semantic Indeterminacy?’, Analytic Philosophy 56: 298–317.Google Scholar
Temkin, L. 1996. ‘A Continuum Argument for Intransitivity’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 25: 175–210.Google Scholar
Temkin, L. 2012. Rethinking the Good: Moral Ideals and the Nature of Practical Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tenenbaum, S. and Raffman, D. 2012. ‘Vague Projects and the Puzzle of the Self-Torturer’, Ethics 123: 86–112.Google Scholar
Toledo, A. and Sassoon, G. W. 2011. ‘Absolute vs. Relative Adjectives – Variance within vs. between Individuals’, Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 21: 135–54.Google Scholar
Torrago, L. 2000. ‘Vague Causation’, Noûs 34: 313–47.Google Scholar
Tranchini, L. and Cobreros, P. 2017. ‘Proof Analysis of Global Consequence’, Logique et Analyse 60: 355–73.Google Scholar
Troelstra, A. S. 1992. Lectures on Linear Logic. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Troelstra, A. S. 2011. ‘History of Constructivism in the Twentieth Century’, in Kennedy, J. and Kossak, R. (eds.) 2011. Set Theory, Arithmetic and Foundations of Mathematics. Theorems, Philosophies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 150–79.Google Scholar
Tye, M. 1990. ‘Vague Objects’, Mind 99: 535–57.Google Scholar
Tye, M. 1994. ‘Sorites Paradoxes and the Semantics of Vagueness’, Philosophical Perspectives 8: 189–206.Google Scholar
Unger, P. 1975. Ignorance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Unger, P. 1979a. ‘Why There Are No People’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5: 177–222.Google Scholar
Unger, P. 1979b. ‘There Are No Ordinary Things’, Synthese 4: 117–54.Google Scholar
Unger, P. 1979c. ‘I Do Not Exist’, in Macdonald, G. F. (ed.), Perception and Identity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 235–51.Google Scholar
Unger, P. 1980a. ‘Scepticism and Nihilism’, Noûs 14: 517–45.Google Scholar
Unger, P. 1980b. ‘The Problem of the Many’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5: 411–68.Google Scholar
van Benthem, J. 1982. ‘Later than Late: On the Logical Origin of the Temporal Order’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 63: 193–203.Google Scholar
Van Cleve, J. 2008. ‘The Moon and Sixpence: A Defense of Mereological Universalism’, in Sider, T., Hawthorne, J. and Zimmerman, D. W. (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 321–40.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, B. C. 1966. ‘Singular Terms, Truth-Value Gaps, and Free Logic’, The Journal of Philosophy 63: 481–95.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, B. C. 1970. ‘Rejoinder: On a Kantian Conception of Language’, in Martin, R. L. (ed.), The Paradox of the Liar. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 59–66.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, P. 1990. Material Beings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
van Rooij, R. 2011a. ‘Implicit versus Explicit Comparatives’, in Égré, P. and Klinedinst, N. (eds.), Vagueness and Language Use. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 51–72.Google Scholar
van Rooij, R. 2011b. ‘Vagueness and Linguistics’, in Ronzitti, G. (ed.), Vagueness: A Guide. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 123–70.Google Scholar
Varzi, A. 2005. ‘Change, Temporal Parts, and the Argument from Vagueness’, Dialectica 59: 485–98.Google Scholar
Varzi, A. 2007a. ‘Promiscuous Endurantism and Diachronic Vagueness’, American Philosophical Quarterly 44: 181–9.Google Scholar
Varzi, A. 2007b. ‘Supervaluationism and Its Logic’, Mind 116: 633–76.Google Scholar
Verheyen, S., De Deyne, S., Dry, M. J. and Storms, G. 2011. ‘Uncovering Contrast Categories in Categorization with a Probabilistic Threshold Model’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 37: 1515–31.Google Scholar
Verheyen, S., Dewil, S. and Égré, P. 2018. ‘Subjectivity in Gradable Adjectives: The Case of Tall and Heavy’, Mind and Language 33: 460–79.Google Scholar
Verheyen, S. and Égré, P. 2018. ‘Typicality and Graded Membership in Dimensional Adjectives’, Cognitive Science 42: 2550–86.Google Scholar
Verheyen, S., Hampton, J. A. and Storms, G. 2010. ‘A Probabilistic Threshold Model: Analyzing Semantic Categorization Data with the Rasch Model’, Acta Psychologica 135: 216–25.Google Scholar
Verheyen, S. and Storms, G. 2011. ‘Towards a Categorization-Based Model of Similarity’, in Carlson, L., Hölscher, C. and Shipley, T. F. (eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 614–9.Google Scholar
Volokh, E. 2003. ‘The Mechanisms of the Slippery Slope’, Harvard Law Review 116: 1026–137.Google Scholar
von Stechow, A. 1984. ‘Comparing Semantic Theories of Comparison’, Journal of Semantics 3: 1–77.Google Scholar
von Stechow, A. 2009. ‘The Temporal Degree Adjectives früh(er)/spät(er) ’early(er)’/’late(r)’ and the Semantics of the Positive’, in Giannakidou, A. and Rathert, M. (eds.), Quantification, Definiteness and Nominalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 214–33.Google Scholar
von Wright, G. H. 1963. Norm and Action. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wake, A. V. 2011. ‘Spacetime and Mereology’, Erkenntnis 74:17–35.Google Scholar
Wallace, M. 2014. ‘The Argument from Vagueness for Modal Parts’, Dialectica 68: 355–73.Google Scholar
Wansing, H. and Priest, G. 2015. ‘External Curries’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 44: 453–71.Google Scholar
Weatherson, B. 2004. ‘True, Truer, Truest’, Philosophical Studies 123: 47–70.Google Scholar
Weatherson, B. 2010. ‘Vagueness as Indeterminacy’, in Dietz, R. and Moruzzi, S. (eds.), Cuts and Clouds: Essays on the Nature and Logic of Vagueness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 77–90.Google Scholar
Weber, Z. 2010. ‘A Paraconsistent Model of Vagueness’, Mind 119: 1025–45.Google Scholar
Weber, Z. and Colyvan, M. 2010. ‘A Topological Sorites’, The Journal of Philosophy 107: 311–25.Google Scholar
Weber, Z., Ripley, D., Priest, G., Hyde, D. and Colyvan, M. 2014. ‘Tolerating Gluts’, Mind 123: 813–28.Google Scholar
Weir, A. 1996. ‘Ultramaximalist Minimalism!’, Analysis 56: 10–22.Google Scholar
Weir, A. 1998. ‘Naïve Set Theory Is Innocent!’, Mind 107: 763–98.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. 1972. ‘Attributives and Their Modifiers’, Noûs 6: 310–34.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. 1975. ‘Reference and Vagueness’, Synthese 30: 367–79.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. 1979. ‘On That Which Is Not’, Synthese 41: 155–94.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. 1983. ‘Megarian Paradoxes as Eleatic Arguments’, American Philosophical Quarterly 20: 287–95.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 1995. ‘Which Slopes Are Slippery’, in Williams, B., Making Sense of Humanity and Other Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 213–23.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 1990. Identity and Discrimination. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 1992a. ‘Inexact Knowledge’, Mind 101: 217–42.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 1992b. ‘Vagueness and Ignorance’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 62: 145–62.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 1994. Vagueness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 1995a. ‘Definiteness and Knowability’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 33: 171–92.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 1995b. ‘Does Assertibility Satisfy the S4 Axiom?’, Crítica 27: 3–22.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 1996a. ‘Cognitive Homelessness’, The Journal of Philosophy 93: 554–73.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 1996b. ‘Putnam on the Sorites Paradox’, Philosophical Papers 25: 47–56.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 1997a. ‘Précis of Vagueness’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57: 921–8.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 1997b. ‘Reply to Commentators’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57: 945–53.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 1997c. ‘Imagination, Stipulation and Vagueness’, Philosophical Issues 8: 215–28.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 1999. ‘On the Structure of Higher-Order Vagueness’, Mind 108: 127–43.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 2000. Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 2002. ‘Soames on Vagueness’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65: 422–8.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 2007. The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 2009. ‘Reference, Inference, and the Semantics of Pejoratives’, in Almog, J. and Leonardi, P. (eds.) 2009. The Philosophy of David Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 137–50.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. 2013. ‘A Determinable-Based Account of Metaphysical Indeterminacy’, Inquiry 56: 359–85.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Translated into English by E. Anscombe. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Wójcicki, R. 1988. Theory of Logical Calculi. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Wright, C. 1975. ‘On the Coherence of Vague Predicates’, Synthese 30: 325–65.Google Scholar
Wright, C. 1976. ‘Language Mastery and the Sorites Paradox’, in Evans, G. and McDowell, J. (eds.), Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 223–47.Google Scholar
Wright, C. 1987. ‘Further Reflections on the Sorites Paradox’, Philosophical Topics 15: 227–90.Google Scholar
Wright, C. 1992. Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, C. 1995. ‘The Epistemic Conception of Vagueness’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 33: 133–59.Google Scholar
Wright, C. 2001. ‘On Being in a Quandary: Relativism, Vagueness, Logical Revisionism’, Mind 110: 45–98.Google Scholar
Wright, C. 2003a. ‘Vagueness: A Fifth Column Approach’ in Beall, JC (ed.), Liars and Heaps: New Essays on Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 84–105.Google Scholar
Wright, C. 2003b. ‘Rosenkranz on Quandary, Vagueness and Intuitionism’, Mind 112: 465–74.Google Scholar
Wright, C. 2004. ‘Intuition, Entitlement, and the Epistemology of Logical Laws’, Dialectica 58: 155–75.Google Scholar
Wright, C. 2007. ‘“Wang’s Paradox”‘, in Auxier, R. E. and Hahn, L. E. (eds.), The Philosophy of Michael Dummett. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court Publishing Company, pp. 415–45.Google Scholar
Wright, C. 2010. ‘The Illusion of Higher-Order Vagueness’, in Dietz, R. and Moruzzi, S. (eds.), Cuts and Clouds: Essays on the Nature and Logic of Vagueness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 523–40.Google Scholar
Yablo, S. 1989. ‘Truth, Definite Truth and Paradox’, The Journal of Philosophy 86: 539–41.Google Scholar
Zadeh, L. A. 1965. ‘Fuzzy Sets’, Information and Control 8: 338–53.Google Scholar
Zadeh, L. A. 1975. ‘Fuzzy Logic and Approximate Reasoning’, Synthese 30: 407–28.Google Scholar
Zardini, E. 2006a. ‘Higher-Order Vagueness and Paradox: The Glory and Misery of S4 Definiteness’, The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 1: 203–20.Google Scholar
Zardini, E. 2006b. ‘Squeezing and Stretching: How Vagueness Can Outrun Borderlineness’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106: 419–26.Google Scholar
Zardini, E. 2008a. ‘A Model of Tolerance’, Studia Logica 90: 337–68.Google Scholar
Zardini, E. 2008b. ‘Living on the Slippery Slope. The Nature, Sources and Logic of Vagueness’. PhD thesis, University of St Andrews.Google Scholar
Zardini, E. 2012a. ‘Luminosity and Vagueness’, Dialectica 66: 375–410.Google Scholar
Zardini, E. 2012b. ‘Truth Preservation in Context and in Its Place’, in Dutilh Novaes, C. and Hjortland, O. (eds.), Insolubles and Consequences. London: College Publications, pp. 249–71.Google Scholar
Zardini, E. 2013a. ‘Higher-Order Sorites Paradox’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 42: 25–48.Google Scholar
Zardini, E. 2013b. ‘Luminosity and Determinacy’, Philosophical Studies 165: 765–86.Google Scholar
Zardini, E. 2014a. ‘Confirming the Less Likely, Discovering the Unknown. Dogmatisms: Surd and Doubly Surd, Natural, Flat and Doubly Flat’, in Dodd, D. and Zardini, E. (eds.), Scepticism and Perceptual Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 33–70.Google Scholar
Zardini, E. 2014b. ‘The General Missing from the Hierarchy’, in Bacchini, F., Caputo, S. and Dell’Utri, M. (eds.), New Frontiers in Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 176–200.Google Scholar
Zardini, E. 2015a. ‘Breaking the Chains. Following-from and Transitivity’, in Caret, C. and Hjortland, O. (eds.), Foundations of Logical Consequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 221–75.Google Scholar
Zardini, E. 2015b. ‘∀ and ω’, in Torza, A. (ed.), Quantifiers, Quantifiers, and Quantifiers: Themes in Logic, Metaphysics, and Language. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 489–526.Google Scholar
Zardini, E. 2017. ‘K ⊊ E’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94: 540–57.Google Scholar
Zardini, E. 2018a. ‘Closed without Boundaries’, forthcoming in Synthese.Google Scholar
Zardini, E. 2018b. ‘First-Order Tolerant Logics’, forthcoming in The Review of Symbolic Logic.Google Scholar
Zardini, E. 2018c. ‘Seconde naïveté’, forthcoming in Bueno, O. and Abasnezhad, A. (eds.), On the Sorites Paradox. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Zardini, E. 2018d. ‘Against the World’, ms.Google Scholar
Zardini, E. 2018e. ‘Instability and Contraction’, ms.Google Scholar
Zardini, E. 2018f. ‘One, and Only One’, ms.Google Scholar
Zardini, E. 2018g. ‘Open Knowledge of One’s Inexact Knowledge’, ms.Google Scholar
Zardini, E. 2018h. ‘Red and Orange’, ms.Google Scholar
Zardini, E. 2018i. ‘The Bearers of Logical Consequence’, ms.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×