Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:14:34.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2023

Robert Kugelmann
Robert Kugelmann
Affiliation:
University of Dallas
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Soul in Soulless Psychology , pp. 277 - 308
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, K. M. (1993). The discourse of souls in Tana Toraja (Indonesia): Indigenous notions and Christian conceptions. Ethnology, 32(1), 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, G. (1961). Erich Neumann (1905–1960). Journal of Analytical Psychology, 6(2), 157–159.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1921). Personality and character. Psychological Bulletin, 18(9), 441–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1924). The study of the undivided personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 19(2), 132–142.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1929). The study of personality by the intuitive method: An experiment in teaching from The Locomotive God. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 24(1), 14–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York, NY: Holt.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1940). The psychologist’s frame of reference. Psychological Bulletin, 37(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1943). The ego in contemporary psychology. Psychological Review, 50(5), 451–478.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1945). The psychology of participation. Psychological Review, 52(3), 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1950). The individual and his religion. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1955). Becoming: Basic considerations for a psychology of personality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W., & Vernon, P. (1930). The field of personality. Psychological Bulletin, 27(6), 677–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. S. (1998). On being human: The spiritual saga of a creaturely soul. In Brown, W. S., Murphey, N., & Malony, H. N. (Eds.), Whatever happened to the soul? Scientific and theological portraits of human nature (pp. 175–194). Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Angell, J. R. (1908). Psychology: An introductory study of the structure and function of human consciousness (4th ed., rev.). New York, NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Angell, J. R. (1913). Behavior as a category of psychology. Psychological Review, 20(4), 255–270.Google Scholar
Anglin, S. M. (2014). I think, therefore I am? Examining conceptions of the self, soul, and mind. Consciousness and Cognition, 29, 105–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anglin, S. M. (2015). On the nature of implicit soul beliefs: When the past weighs more than the present. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(2), 394–404.Google Scholar
Arden, A. S. K. (2015). Orbits of symphony. Parker, CO: Outskirts Press.Google Scholar
Arden, A. S. K. (2022). Figures in orbits of symphony: Stories and ideas. St. Louis, MO: En Route.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . (1935). On the soul. In Hett, W. S. (Trans.), Aristotle on the soul, parva naturalia, on breath (pp. 2–203). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Arnett, L. D. (1904a). The soul: A study of past and present beliefs. American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 121–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnett, L. D. (1904b). The soul: A study of past and present beliefs. American Journal of Psychology, 15(3), 347–382.Google Scholar
Arnold, M. B. (1954). Basic assumptions in psychology. In Arnold, M. B. & Gasson, J. A. (Eds.), The human person: An approach to an integral theory of personality (pp. 3–48). New York, NY: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, M. B. (1955). Comment concerning Sappenfield’s review of Arnold and Gasson’s The human person. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 372–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, M. B. (1959). Psychology and the image of man. Religious Education, 54(1), 30–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, M. B. (1960a). Emotion and personality: Psychological aspects (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, M. B. (1960b). Emotion and personality: Neurological and physiological aspects (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, M. B. (1977). The concept of mind in psychology. Philosophical Psychologist, 11(2), 4–7.Google Scholar
Arnold, M. B., & Gasson, J. A. (Eds.). (1954). The human person: An approach to an integral theory of personality. New York, NY: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
Auer, P. (2005). A postscript: Code-switching and social identity. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(3), 403–410.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). Sense and sensibilia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Avens, R. (1980). Imagination is reality: Western nirvana in Jung, Hillman, Barfield and Cassirer. Irving, TX: Spring Publications.Google Scholar
Bachelard, G. (1987). Psychoanalysis of fire (A. C. M. Ross, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon. (Originally published 1938)Google Scholar
Baker, M. C., & Goetz, S. (Eds.). (2011). The soul hypothesis: Investigations into the existence of the soul. New York, NY: Continuum Books.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1896). A new factor in evolution (continued). The American Naturalist, 30(355), 536–553.Google Scholar
Balmes, J. (1856). Fundamental philosophy (2 vols.; H. F. Brownson, Trans.). New York, NY: D. & J. Sadlier. (Name cited in Maher as Balmez)Google Scholar
Barbre, C. B. (2004). Otto Rank’s psychology of will and soul and its spiritual implications for psychotherapeutic theory and practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. New York, NY: Union Theological Seminary.Google Scholar
Barbre, C. (2007). Freud, science, and soul: A review essay. Journal of Religion and Health, 46(4), 607–624.Google Scholar
Barnes, M. H. (2005). Science and the soul. New York, NY: Orbis.Google Scholar
Barnett, K. L. (2008). [Review of the book Foundations of soul care: A Christian psychology proposal by Eric L. Johnson.] Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 27(3), 279–280.Google Scholar
Barreto, M. H. (2017). A note on “soul,” “man,” anthropology and psychology. In Sandoval, J. M. & Knapp, J. C. (Eds.), Psychology as the discipline of interiority: “The psychological difference” in the work of Wolfgang Giegerich (pp. 98–104). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Barrett, W. (1986). Death of the soul: From Descartes to the computer. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.Google Scholar
Baum, W. M. (2017). Understanding behaviorism: Behavior, culture, and evolution (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. (1987). How the self became a problem: A psychological review of historical research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 163–176.Google Scholar
Beck, J. R. (2003). Self and soul: Exploring the boundary between psychotherapy and spiritual formation. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 31(1), 24–36.Google Scholar
Beck, J. R., & Demarest, B. (2005). The human person in theology and psychology. Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel.Google Scholar
Becker, E. (1973). The denial of death. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Benes, T. (2006). Language and the cognitive subject: Heymann Steinthal (1823–1899) and Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900). Language & Cognition, 26(3–4), 218–230.Google Scholar
Bennett, L. (1964). The Negro mood. Chicago, IL: Johnson Pub.Google Scholar
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge, Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Bering, J. M. (2006a). The cognitive science of souls: Clarifications and extensions of the evolutionary model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(5), 486–498.Google Scholar
Bering, J. M. (2006b). The folk psychology of souls. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(5), 453–462.Google Scholar
Bering, J. (2011). The god instinct: The psychology of souls, destiny and the meaning of life. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.Google Scholar
Bering, J. M., & Bjorklund, D. F. (2004). The natural emergence of reasoning about the afterlife as a developmental regularity. Developmental Psychology, 40(2), 217–233.Google Scholar
Bevan, W. (1979). Harry Helson: 1898–1977. American Journal of Psychology, 92(1), 153–160.Google Scholar
Bishop, P. (1995). The Dionysian self: C. G. Jung’s reception of Friedrich Nietzsche. New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, W. (1988). Letter [To Thomas Butts, 22 November 1802]. In Erdman, D. V. (Ed.), The complete poetry and prose of William Blake (Newly rev. ed., pp. 720–722). New York, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Bloom, A. (1987). The closing of the American mind. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. (2004). Descartes’ baby: How the science of child development explains what makes us human. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. (2007). Religion is natural. Developmental Science, 10(1), 147–151.Google Scholar
Boring, E. G. (1923). Intelligence as the tests test it. New Republic, 36, 35–37.Google Scholar
Boring, E. G. (1950). A history of experimental psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Boyd, J. H. (1995a). The soul as seen through evangelical eyes: I. Mental health professionals and “the soul.” Journal of Psychology and Theology, 23, 151–160.Google Scholar
Boyd, J. H. (1995b). The soul as seen through evangelical eyes: II. On use of the term “soul.” Journal of Psychology and Theology, 23, 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, J. H. (1996). Reclaiming the soul: The search for meaning in a self-centered culture. Cleveland, OH: Pilgrim Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, J. H. (1997a). An insider’s effort to blow up psychiatry. Journal of Biblical Counseling, 15(3), 21–31.Google Scholar
Boyd, J. H. (1997b). One’s self-concept and Biblical theology. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 40(2), 207–227.Google Scholar
Boyd, J. H. (1998). A history of the concept of the soul during the 20th century. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 26, 66–82.Google Scholar
Braun, W. P. (1968). Monsignor Edward A. Pace, educator and philosopher. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America.Google Scholar
Brennan, R. E. (1925). Theory of abnormal cognitive processes according to St. Thomas Aquinas. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America.Google Scholar
Brennan, R. E. (1937). General psychology: An interpretation of the science of the mind based on Thomas Aquinas. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1973). Psychology from an empirical standpoint (A. C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell, & A. A. McAlister, Trans.). New York, NY: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Originally published 1874)Google Scholar
Bridgman, P. W. (1927). The logic of modern physics. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Brierley, M. F. E. (1951). Trends in psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Britton, R. (1995). Psychic reality and unconscious belief. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 76, 19–23.Google Scholar
Brown, W. (1920). Immortality in the light of modern psychology. In Matthews, W. R. (Ed.), King’s College lectures on immortality (pp. 123–165). London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Brown, W. (1922). Psychology and psychotherapy. London: Edward Arnold & Co.Google Scholar
Brown, W. (1929). Science and personality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, W. (1946). Personality and religion. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Brown, W., & Thomson, G. H. (1921). Mental measurement. In Brown, W. & Thomson, G. H., The essentials of mental measurement (p. 1–12). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, W. S. (2004). Neurobiological embodiment of spirituality and soul. In Jeeves, M. (Ed.), From cells to souls – and beyond: Changing portraits of human nature (pp. 58–76). Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1961). Preface to the Beacon Press edition. In McDougall, W, Body and mind: A history and a defense of animism (pp. vii–xvii). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J., & Feldman, C. F. (1990). Metaphors of consciousness and cognition in the history of psychology. In Leary, D. E. (Ed.), Metaphors in the history of psychology (pp. 230–238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bryan, C. D. (1986). A descriptive study of the life and work of John William Drakeford. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Fort Worth, TX: Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary.Google Scholar
Buchner, E. F. (1902). Some characteristics of the genetic method. Psychological Review, 9(5), 490–507.Google Scholar
Buchner, E. F. (1912). Psychological progress in 1911. Psychological Bulletin, 9(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
Bultmann, R. (1951–1955). Theology of the New Testament (K. Grobel, Trans.). New York, NY: Scribner.Google Scholar
Bunyan, J. (n.d.). Holy war, made by Shaddai upon Diabolus, for the regaining of the Metropolis of the world; or, The losing and taking again of the town of Mansoul. London: The Book Society. (Originally published 1682)Google Scholar
Burt, C. (1952). Dr. William Brown [Obituary]. British Journal of Psychology: Statistical Section, 5, 137–138.Google Scholar
Buss, A. (2000). The evolution of Western individualism. Religion, 30(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Butera, G. (2010). Thomas Aquinas and cognitive therapy: An exploration of the promise of the Thomistic psychology. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 17(4), 347–366.Google Scholar
Calkins, M. W. (1911). General standpoints; mind and body. Psychological Bulletin, 8(1), 14–19.Google Scholar
Calkins, M. W. (1912). A first book in psychology (3rd rev. ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Calkins, M. W. (1915). [Review of Psychology, general and applied by H. Münsterberg]. Psychological Bulletin, 12(1), 38–41.Google Scholar
Calkins, M. W. (1917). The case against soul. Psychological Review, 24(4), 278–300.Google Scholar
Calkins, M. W. (1918). Reply: Miss Calkins’s case of self against soul. Psychological Review, 25(2), 168–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, E. (1998). Popularizing American psychotherapy: The Emmanuel Movement 1906–1910. History of Psychology, 1(4), 289–314.Google Scholar
Carey, S. (1996). Cognitive domains as modes of thought. In Olson, D. R. & Torrance, N. (Eds.), Modes of thought: Explorations in culture and cognition (pp. 187–215). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carus, C. G. (2017). Psyche (R. Welch, Trans.). Thompson, CT: Spring Publications. (Originally published 1846)Google Scholar
Casey, E. S. (1972). Freud’s theory of reality: A critical account. Review of Metaphysics, 25(4), 659–690.Google Scholar
Casey, E. S., & Miller, D. L. (2007). Guest editors’ introduction. Spring: A Journal of Archetype and Culture, 77, 1–8.Google Scholar
Cason, H. (1923). [Review of the book Psychology, The science of human behavior by R. C. Givler]. Psychological Bulletin, 20, 444–447.Google Scholar
Cassar, L. (2020). Jung’s technique of active imagination and Desoille’s directed waking dream method: Bridging the divide. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cassian, J. (1894). Conference of Abbot Serapion on the eight principal faults. In Schaff, P. & Wace, H., Eds., Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Vol. 11 (C. S. Gibson, Trans.). Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Cerullo, J. J. (1982). The secularization of the soul: Psychical research in Britain, 1882–1920. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.Google Scholar
Charles, E. (2011). Introduction – finding Holt. In Charles, E. P., (Ed.), A new look at new realism (pp. xxxi–lviii). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Christou, E. (1963). The logos of the soul. Zurich: Dunquin Press.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. M. (1988). Matter and consciousness: A contemporary introduction to the philosophy of mind (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. (2010). Body and soul in mental health care. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 13(6), 649–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, P. (2009). Neuroscience and the soul: A response to Malcolm Jeeves. Science and Christian Belief, 21(1), 61–64.Google Scholar
Coe, G. A. (1909). Religion and the subconscious. American Journal of Theology, 13(3), 337–349.Google Scholar
Coffey, P. (1917). Epistemology or the theory of knowledge: An introduction to general metaphysics. London: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Coffey, P. (1960). Preface to the English edition. In Parker, T. L. & Parker, S. A. (Eds. & Trans.), A manual of modern scholastic philosophy (Vol. 1, pp. vii–ix, 3rd English ed.). St. Louis, MO: B. Herder. (Originally published 1915)Google Scholar
Colman, W. (2017). Soul in the world: Symbolic culture as the medium for psyche. The Journal of Analytical Psychology, 62(1), 32–49.Google Scholar
Condillac, E. B. de. (1930). Condillac’s treatise on the sensations (Carr, G., Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California. (Originally published 1754)Google Scholar
Conklin, E. S. (1929). Psychology of religious adjustment. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Conklin, E. S. (1944). Principles of abnormal psychology. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Coon, D. J. (1994). Standardizing the subject: Experimental psychologists, introspection, and the quest for a technoscientific ideal. Technology and Culture, 34, 757–783.Google Scholar
Coon, D. (2000). Salvaging the self in a world without soul: William James’s The Principles of Psychology. History of Psychology, 3(2), 83–103.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. W. (1989). Body, soul, and life everlasting: Biblical anthropology and the monism-dualism debate. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Copleston, F. C. (1960). Review of The soul in metaphysical and empirical psychology by Stephan Strasser. Philosophy, 35(135), 368–370.Google Scholar
Corbett, L. (2010). Soul: A depth psychological approach. In Leeming, D. A., Madden, K., & Marlan, S. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of psychology and religion (pp. 866–868). Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
Corbin, H. (1992). Avicenna and the visionary recital (W. Trask, Trans). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cornelius, R. R. (2006). Magda Arnold’s Thomistic theory of emotion, the self-ideal, and the moral dimension of appraisal. Cognition and Emotion, 20(7), 976–1000.Google Scholar
Cornett, C. (1998). The soul of psychotherapy: Recapturing the spiritual dimension in the therapeutic encounter. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Cornwell, J. (2012). Ethics and neuroscience. Brain, 135(7), 2296–2300.Google Scholar
Crabtree, A. (2003). “Automatism” and the emergence of dynamic psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 39(1), 51–70.Google Scholar
Crawshaw, W. H. (1931). The indispensable soul. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Creighton, J. E. (1918). Miss Calkins’s case of self against soul. Psychological Review, 25(2), 166–168.Google Scholar
Cross, R. W. (1998). Aquinas on psychology. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 17(4), 306–320.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (2010). Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Danaher, K. (1972). The year in Ireland. Cork: Irish Books and Media.Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (1980). The history of introspection reconsidered. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16(3), 241–262.Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (2012). Historical psychology of persons: Categories and practice. In Martin, J. & Bickhard, M. (Eds.), The psychology of personhood: Philosophical, historical, social-developmental, and narrative perspectives (pp. 59–80). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (2013). Psychology and its history. Theory & Psychology, 23(6), 829–839.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Dashiell, J. F. (1918). Sixteen origins of the mind. American Journal of Psychology, 29(4), 435–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Castro, E. B. V. (1998). Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4(3), 469–488.Google Scholar
de Figueiredo, L. C. (2004). C. G. Jung, Father Victor White and privation boni. Available: www.academia.edu/7344691/C_G_Jung_Father_Victor_White_and_privatio_boniGoogle Scholar
Descartes, R. (1972). Treatise of man (T. S. Hall, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Originally published 1644)Google Scholar
Devereux, G. (1967). From anxiety to method in the behavioral sciences. The Hague: Mouton & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, M. J. (2019). The reality of the soul in an age of neuroscience. Nova et Vetera, 17(3), 893–912.Google Scholar
Drakeford, J. W. (1964). Psychology in search of a soul. Nashville, TN: Broadman Press.Google Scholar
Driesch, H. (1925). The crisis in psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
DuBois, W. E. B. (2007). The soul of Black folk. New York, NY: Cosimo Classics. (Originally published 1903)Google Scholar
Dubray, C. A. (1907). The new psychology. Catholic University Bulletin, 13, 44–60.Google Scholar
Ducker, E. N. (1961). A Christian therapy for a neurotic world. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Dumont, L. (1982). A modified view of our origins: The Christian beginnings of modern individualism. Religion, 12(1), 1–27.Google Scholar
Dunlap, K. (1912). A system of psychology. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Dupre, L. (1974). The mystical experience of the self and its philosophical significance. In McLeon, G. F. (Ed.), Thomas and Bonaventure: A septicentenary commemoration (pp. 149–165). Washington, DC: Catholic University of America.Google Scholar
Duvall, N. S. (1998). From soul to self and back again. Journal of Theology and Psychology, 26(1), 6–15.Google Scholar
Dyck, C. (2014). Kant and rational psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eberl, J. T. (2004). Aquinas on the nature of human beings. Review of Metaphysics, 58(2), 333–365.Google Scholar
Ellenberger, H. (1970). The discovery of the unconscious: The history and evolution of dynamic psychiatry. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. M. (1931). Albert Paul Weiss: 1879–1931. American Journal of Psychology, 43(4), 707–709.Google Scholar
English, H. B., & English, A. C. (1958). A comprehensive dictionary of psychological and psychoanalytical terms. New York, NY: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Ensoul. (n.d.). In Oxford English dictionary. Retrieved May 2, 2022, from oed.com/view/Entry/62714?redirectedFrom=ensoul&Google Scholar
Esper, E. A. (1968). Mentalism and objectivism in linguistics: The sources of Leonard Bloomfield’s psychology of language. New York, NY: American Elsevier Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Estes, D. (2006). Evidence for early dualism and a more direct path to afterlife beliefs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(5), 470.Google Scholar
Etchegoyen, R. H. (1996). Some views on psychic reality. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 77, 1–14.Google Scholar
Fabro, C. (1938). Knowledge and perception in Aristotelic-Thomistic psychology. New Scholasticism, 12, 337–365.Google Scholar
Farges, A. (1897). Le cerveau, l’âme et les facultés (5th ed.). Paris: Berche & Tralin.Google Scholar
Feigl, H. (1950). The mind-body problem in the development of Logical Empiricism. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 4(11), 64–83.Google Scholar
Fenn, R. K. (1995). Introduction: Why the soul? In Fenn, R. K. & Capps, D. (Eds.), On losing the soul (pp. 1–20). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Feser, E. (2020). Soul proprietor. First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life, 300, 105–109.Google Scholar
Fisher, S. C. (1925). The psychological and educational work of Granville Stanley Hall. American Journal of Psychology, 36(1), 1–52.Google Scholar
Fleck, L. (1986). To look, to see, to know. In Cohen, R. S. & Schnelle, T. (Eds.), Cognition and fact: Material on Ludwig Fleck (pp. 129–151). Dordrecht: Reidel Pub. (Originally published 1947)Google Scholar
Flournoy, T. (1900). From India to the planet Mars: A study of a case of somnambulism with glossolalia (D. B. Vermilye, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper & Bros.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flournoy, T. (1903). Review of the book Human personality and its survival of bodily death by F. W. H. Myers. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 18(46), 42–53.Google Scholar
Forstmann, M., & Burgmer, P. (2015). Adults are intuitive mind-body dualists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 222–235.Google Scholar
Forstmann, M., & Burgmer, P. (2017). Antecedents, manifestations, and consequences of belief in mind-body dualism. In Zedelius, C. M., Müller, B. C. N., & Schooler, J. W. (Eds.), The science of lay theories: How beliefs shape our cognitions (pp. 181–205). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Fortlage, K. (1855). System der Psychologie als empirischer Wissenschaft aus der Beobachtung des innern Sinnes. Leipzig, Germany: Brodhaus.Google Scholar
Frazer, J. G. (1894). The golden bough: A study in comparative religion (2 vols.). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1950). Totem and taboo (J. Strachey, Trans.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton. (Originally published 1914)Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1953). The interpretation of dreams (second part). In Strachey, J. (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 5, pp. 1–623). London: Hogarth Press. (Originally published 1900)Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1959). Creative writers and daydreams. In Strachey, J. (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 9, pp. 141–153). London: Hogarth Press. (Originally published 1908)Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1960). The ego and the id (J. Riviere, Trans.; J. Strachey, Rev. Trans.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton. (Originally published 1923)Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1961). Civilization and its discontents. In Strachey, J. (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 21, pp. 57–145). London: Hogarth Press. (Originally published 1931)Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1964). Psychoanalytic notes on an autobiographical account of a case of paranoia. In Freud, S., The standard edition of the complete psychological works (Vol. 12, pp. 9–82). London: Hogarth. (Originally published 1911)Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1971). Negation. In Strachey, J. (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 19, pp. 235–239). London: Hogarth Press. (Originally published 1925)Google Scholar
Fromm, E. (1950). Psychoanalysis and religion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, R. (1988). Psychological religiousness: Resisting the tide of disenchantment. Pastoral Psychology, 36(3), 146–163.Google Scholar
Fullerton, G. S. (1897). The ‘knower’ in psychology. Psychological Review, 4(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
Fullerton, G. S. (1902). The atomic self. Psychological Review, 9(3), 231–253.Google Scholar
Fungai, P., & Allison, E. (2016). Psychic reality and the nature of consciousness. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 97(1), 5–24.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (1989). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed., J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (1996). The enigma of health: The art of healing in a scientific age (J. Gaiger & N. Walker, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Garvey, C. R. (1929). List of American psychology laboratories. Psychological Bulletin, 26, 652–660.Google Scholar
Gasson, J. A. (1954). Personality theory: A formulation of general principles. In Arnold, M. B. & Gasson, J. A. (Eds.). The human person: An approach to an integral theory of personality (pp. 165–221). New York, NY: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
Gauld, A. (1992). A history of hypnotism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Giegerich, W. (1975). Ontogeny = phylogeny? A fundamental critique of Erich Neumann’s analytical psychology. In Spring 1975: An annual of archetypal psychology and Jungian thought (pp. 110–129). New York, NY: Spring Publications.Google Scholar
Giegerich, W. (1999). The soul’s logical life. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gillies, V., Harden, A., Johnson, K., Reavey, P., Strange, V., & Willig, C. (2004). Women’s collective constructions of embodied practices through memory work: Cartesian dualism in memories of sweating and pain. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 99–112.Google Scholar
Giorgi, A. (1970). Psychology as a human science: A phenomenologically based approach. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Giorgi, A. (1990). The implications of James’s plea for psychology as a natural science. In Johnson, M. G. & Henley, T. B. (Eds.), Reflections on The Principles of Psychology: William James after a century (pp. 63–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Giraudon, D. (2008). Dust and ashes: Sweeping the souls in Celtic countries. Béaloideas, 76, 119–138.Google Scholar
Givler, R. C. (1915). The “conscious cross-section”: A realistic psychology. Seattle: University of Washington, Department of Printing.Google Scholar
Givler, R. C. (1922). Psychology: The science of human behavior. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Goetz, S. (2005). Substance dualism. In Green, J. B. & Palmer, S. L. (Eds.), In search of the soul: Four views of the mind-body problem (pp. 33–60). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, N. (1975). Archetypal theory after Jung. In Spring: An annual of archetypal psychology and Jungian thought (pp. 199–220). New York, NY: Spring Publications.Google Scholar
Goldwert, M. (1985). Otto Rank and man’s urge to immortality. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 21, 169–177.Google Scholar
Good, M. I., Day, M., & Rowell, E. (2005). False memories, negative affects, and psychic reality: The role of extra-clinical data in psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 86(6), 1573–1593.Google Scholar
Gori, P. (2015). Psychology without a soul, philosophy without an I. Nietzsche and 19th century psychophysics (Fechner, Lange, Mach). In Constâncio, J., Mayer Branco, M. J., & Ryan, B. (Eds.), Nietzsche and the problem of subjectivity (pp. 166–195). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Graumann, C. F. (1996). Psyche and her descendants. In Graumann, C. F. & Gergen, K. J. (Eds.), Historical dimensions of psychological discourse (pp. 83–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, A. J. (2010). Whatever happened to the soul? Some theological implications of neuroscience. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 13(6), 637–648.Google Scholar
Green, C. D. (2002). Toronto’s “other” original APA member: James Gibson Hume. Canadian Psychology, 43(1), 35–45.Google Scholar
Green, C. D. (2015). Hall’s developmental theory and Haekel’s recapitulationism. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12(6), 656–665.Google Scholar
Green, C. D. (2019). Where did Freud’s iceberg metaphor come from? History of Psychology, 22(4), 369–272.Google Scholar
Green, C. D., Heidari, C., Chiacchia, D., & Martin, S. M. (2016). Bridge over troubled waters? The most “central” members of Psychology and Philosophy Associations ca. 1900. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 52(3), 279–299.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J., Sullivan, D., Kosloff, S., & Solomon, S. (2006). Souls do not live by cognitive inclinations alone, but by the desire to exist beyond death as well. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(5), 474–475.Google Scholar
Grever, M., & Adriaansen, R.-J. (2019). Historical consciousness: The enigma of different paradigms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(6), 814–830.Google Scholar
Grinder, R. E. (1967). A history of genetic psychology: The first science of human development. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Groark, K. P. (2019). Freud among the Boasians: Psychoanalytic influence and ambivalence in American anthropology. Current Anthropology, 20(4), 559–588f.Google Scholar
Gruender, H. (1912). Psychology without a soul: A criticism. St. Louis, MO: B. Herder.Google Scholar
Gruender, H. (1920). An introductory course in experimental psychology; A text-book and laboratory-manual for the use of colleges and for private study. Chicago, IL: Loyola University Press.Google Scholar
Gutberlet, C. (1905). Psychophysik; Historisch-Kritische Studien ueber experimentelle Psychologie. Mainz, Germany: Kirchheim.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1995). Rewriting the soul: Multiple personality and the sciences of memory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1999). Making up people. In Biagioli, M. (Ed.), The science studies reader (pp. 161–171). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haeckel, E. (1905). The riddle of the universe at the end of the nineteenth century (J. McCabe, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper & Bros.Google Scholar
Hale, M. (1980). Human science and social order: Hugo Münsterberg and the origins of applied psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, G. S. (1885a). The new psychology. Andover Review, 3(14), 120–135.Google Scholar
Hall, G. S. (1885b). The new psychology. Andover Review, 3(15), 239–248.Google Scholar
Hall, G. S. (1887). [Review of the books, Psychology: The cognitive powers by James McCosh, Introduction to psychological theory by Borden P. Bowne, and Psychology by John Dewey]. American Journal of Psychology, 1, 146–159.Google Scholar
Hall, G. S. (1891). [Review of W. James, Principles of psychology]. American Journal of Psychology, 3(4), 578–591.Google Scholar
Hall, G. S. (1898). Some aspects of the early sense of self. American Journal of Psychology, 9(3), 351–395.Google Scholar
Hall, G. S. (1904). Adolescence (2 vols.). New York, NY: D. Appleton & Co.Google Scholar
Hall, G. S. (1908). A glance at the phyletic background of genetic psychology. American Journal of Psychology, 19(2), 149–212.Google Scholar
Hall, G. S. (1909). Evolution and psychology. In Fifty years of Darwinism: Modern aspects of evolution (pp. 251–267). New York, NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Hall, G. S. (1910). The point of view toward primitive races. Journal of Race Development, 1(1), 5–11.Google Scholar
Hall, G. S. (1912). Why Kant is passing. American Journal of Psychology, 23(3), 370–426.Google Scholar
Hall, G. S. (1915). Thanatophobia and immortality. American Journal of Psychology, 26(4), 550–613.Google Scholar
Hall, G. S. (1917). Jesus, the Christ, in the light of psychology (2 vols.). Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Page & Co.Google Scholar
Hall, G. S. (1920). Morale, the supreme standard of life and conduct. New York, NY: D. Appleton & Co.Google Scholar
Hall, G. S. (1923). Life and confessions of a psychologist. New York, NY: D. Appleton & Co.Google Scholar
Hamilton, T. (2009). Immortal longings: FWH Myers and the Victorian search for life after death. Charlottesville, VA: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Hampton, P. (1941). [Review of Cognitive psychology]. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 36(2), 300–302.Google Scholar
Harris, B. (1998). The perils of a public intellectual. Journal of Social Issues, 54(1), 79–118.Google Scholar
Hart, B. (1910). The conception of the subconscious. In Prince, M. (Ed.), Subconscious phenomena (pp. 102–141). Boston, MA: Gorham Press.Google Scholar
Hartmann, G. W. (1949). [Review of The driving forces of human nature and their adjustment: An introduction to the psychology and psychopathology of emotional behavior and volitional control]. Psychological Bulletin, 46(1), 83–85.Google Scholar
Hatfield, G. (1995). Remaking the science of mind: Psychology as natural science. In Fox, C., Porter, R., & Wokler, R. (Eds.), Inventing human science: Eighteenth-century domains (pp. 184–231). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O. (1946). On the nature of fear. Psychological Review, 53(5), 259–276.Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O. (1958). A textbook of psychology. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O. (1959). Karl Spencer Lashley: 1890–1958. American Journal of Psychology, 72(1), 142–150.Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O. (1960). The American revolution. American Psychologist, 15(12), 735–745.Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O. (1974). What psychology is about. American Psychologist, 29(2), 71–79.Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O. (1980). Essay on mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O. (1982a). The problem of consciousness and introspection. In Buchtel, H. A. (Ed.), The conceptual nervous system (pp. 22–31). New York, NY: Pergamon. (Originally published 1954)Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O. (1982b). To know your own mind. In Buchtel, H. A. (Ed.), The conceptual nervous system (pp. 174–178). New York, NY: Pergamon. (Originally published 1977)Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Helson, H. (1925). The psychology of Gestalt. American Journal of Psychology, 36, 342–370.Google Scholar
Helson, H. (1940). [Review of the book, Cognitive psychology by T. V. Moore]. Character & Personality, 8(4), 342–343.Google Scholar
Henley, T. B., Johnson, M. G., Jones, E. M., & Herzog, H. A. (1989). Definitions of psychology. The Psychological Record, 39(1), 143–151.Google Scholar
Heynickx, R., & Symons, S. (2018). Into Neo-Thomism: Reading the fabric of an intellectual movement. In Heynickx, R. & Symons, S. (Eds.), So what’s new about scholasticism: How Neo-Thomism helped shape the twentieth century (pp. 3–16). Berlin & Boston, MA: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
High, R., & Woodward, W. (1980). William James and Gordon Allport: Parallels in their maturing conceptions of self and personality. In Rieber, R. & Salzinger, K. (Eds.), Psychology: Theoretical-historical perspectives (pp. 57–79). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hilgard, E. R. (1987). Psychology in America: A historical survey. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Hillman, J. (1960). Emotions: A comprehensive phenomenology of theories and their meaning for therapy. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Hillman, J. (1967). Insearch: Psychology and religion. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Hillman, J. (1972). The myth of analysis: Three essays in archetypal psychology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Hillman, J. (1975). Re-visioning psychology. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Hillman, J. (1976). Suicide and the soul. Zürich: Spring.Google Scholar
Hillman, J. (1977). An inquiry into image. In Spring: An annual of archetypal psychology and Jungian thought (pp. 62–88). New York, NY: Spring Publications.Google Scholar
Hillman, J. (1979). The dream and the underworld. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Hillman, J. (2010). Alchemical psychology (Uniform ed., Vol. 5). Putnam, CT: Spring Publications.Google Scholar
Hillman, J. (2013). Archetypal psychology. Putnam, CT: Spring Publications.Google Scholar
Hillman, J., & Shamdasani, S. (2013). Lament of the dead: Psychology after Jung’s Red Book. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Hinkelman, E. A., & Aderman, M. (1968). Apparent theoretical parallels between G. Stanley Hall and Carl Jung. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 4, 254–257.Google Scholar
Hodge, K. M. (2016). The death we fear is not or own: The folk psychology of souls revisited and reframed. In De Cruz, H. & Nichols, R. (Eds.), Advances in religion, cognitive science, and experimental philosophy (pp. 197–217). London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R. R., Cochran, E. L., & Nead, J. M. (1990). Cognitive metaphors in experimental psychology. In Leary, D. E. (Ed.), Metaphors in the history of psychology (pp. 173–229). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holt, E. B. (1914a). The concept of consciousness. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Holt, E. B. (1914b). [Review of the book Body and mind, a history and a defense of animism by William McDougall]. Psychological Bulletin, 11, 186–188.Google Scholar
Holt, E. B. (1914c). [Review of the book Body and mind, a history and a defense of animism by William McDougall]. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 9, 197–198.Google Scholar
Holt, E. B. (1915). The Freudian wish and its place in ethics. New York, NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Holt, E. B. (1942). William James the psychologist. In In commemoration of William James (pp. 34–47). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Holt, E. B., Marvin, W. T., Montague, W. P., Perry, R. B., Pitkin, W. B., & Spaulding, E. G. (1910). The program and platform of six realists. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and the Scientific Methods, 7, 393–401.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, M. (1974). Critique of instrumental reason. New York, NY: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1889). On the immortality of the soul. In Green, T. H. & Grose, T. H. (Eds.), Essays moral, political and literary (Vol. 2, pp. 399–405). London: Longmans, Green, & Co.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1896). A treatise of human nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Originally published 1739)Google Scholar
Hume, J. G. (1909). The proper affiliation of psychology: With philosophy or the natural sciences. Psychological Bulletin, 6, 65–67.Google Scholar
Humphrey, G. (1951). Thinking: An introduction to its experimental psychology. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1928). Logische Untersuchungen (4th ed.). Halle an der Saale, Germany: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. (Originally published 1954)Google Scholar
Hutto, D., & Ravenscroft, I. (2021). Folk psychology as a theory. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2021 ed.). Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/folkpsych-theory/Google Scholar
Hutto, D. D., & Ratcliffe, M. (Eds.). (2007a). Folk psychology re-assessed. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
Illich, I. (1992). H2O and the waters of forgetfulness. In Illich, I., In the mirror of the past: Lectures and addresses 1978–1990 (pp. 145–158). New York, NY: Marion Boyars.Google Scholar
Jackson, B. (1975). The psuche in psychology and theology. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 3(1), 3–10.Google Scholar
James, W. (1887). Ladd’s physiological psychology. Nation, 44(2), 473.Google Scholar
James, W. (1890a). Principles of psychology. New York, NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
James, W. (1890b). The hidden self. Scribner’s Magazine, 7(3), 361–373.Google Scholar
James, W. (1892). A plea for psychology as a “natural science.” Philosophical Review, 1, 146–153.Google Scholar
James, W. (1895). The knowing of things together. Psychological Review, 2(2), 105–124.Google Scholar
James, W. (1901). Frederic Myers’s service to psychology. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 17(May), 13–23.Google Scholar
James, W. (1903). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature. New York, NY: Longmans, Green, and Co.Google Scholar
James, W. (1909). A pluralistic universe. New York, NY: Longmans, Green, & Co.Google Scholar
James, W. (1912). Essays in radical empiricism. New York, NY: Longmans, Green, & Co.Google Scholar
Janet, P. (1889). L’automatisme psychologique. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
Janet, P. (1907). The major symptoms of hysteria. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, A. (2018). The biological mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Jeeves, M. (2009). The Boyle Lecture 2008: Psychologizing and neurologizing about religion: Facts, fallacies and the future. Science & Christian Belief, 21(1), 25–54.Google Scholar
Jensen, S. J. (2018). The human person: A beginner’s Thomistic psychology. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, E. L. (1998). Whatever happened to the human soul? A brief Christian genealogy of a psychological term. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 26(1), 16–78.Google Scholar
Johnson, E. L. (2007). Foundations of soul care: A Christian psychology proposal. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
Jones, R. A. (2005). The secret of the totem: Religion and society from McLennan to Freud. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G. (1916). Psychology of the unconscious: A study of the transformations and symbolisms of the libido, a contribution to the history of the evolution of thought (B. M. Hinkle, Trans.). London: Kegan Paul Trench Trübner. (Originally published 1912)Google Scholar
Jung, C. G. (1933). Modern man in search of a soul (W. S. Dell & C. F. Baynes, Trans.). New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G. (1954). Answer to Job (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G. (1960a). Basic postulates of analytical psychology. In The structure and dynamics of the psyche (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.; pp. 338–357). The collected works of C. G. Jung, Vol. 8. New York, NY: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G. (1960b). On the nature of the psyche. In The structure and dynamics of the psyche (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.; pp. 159–234). The collected works of C. G. Jung, Vol. 8. New York, NY: Pantheon. (Originally published 1947)Google Scholar
Jung, C. G. (1960c). The real and the surreal. In The structure and dynamics of the psyche (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.; pp. 382–384). The collected works of C. G. Jung, Vol. 8. New York, NY: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G. (1960d). The transcendent function. In The structure and dynamics of the psyche (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.; pp. 67–91). The collected works of C. G. Jung, Vol. 8. New York, NY: Pantheon. (Originally published 1916)Google Scholar
Jung, C. G. (1964). The spiritual problem of modern man. In Civilization in transition (2nd ed., R. F. C. Hull, Trans.; pp. 74–94). The collected works of C. G. Jung, Vol. 10. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G. (1966). The aims of psychotherapy. In McGuire, W. (Exec. Ed.), Read, Sir H., Fordham, M., & Adler, G. (Eds.). Collected works of C. G. Jung, Vol. 16: The practice of psychotherapy. (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.; pp. 36–52). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Originally published in 1931)Google Scholar
Jung, C. G. (1976). The Tavistock lectures: On the theory and practice of analytical psychology. In McGuire, W. (Exec. Ed.), Sir Read, H., Fordham, M., & Adler, G. (Eds.). Collected works of C. G. Jung, Vol. 18: The symbolic life. (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.; pp. 5–182). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Originally published in 1935)Google Scholar
Jung, C. G. (2009). The red book: Liber novus (Shamdasani, S., Ed.; M. Kyburz, J. Peck, & S. Shamdasani, Trans.). New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Kantor, J. R. (1940). [Review of Cognitive psychology]. Psychological Bulletin, 37(4), 249–250.Google Scholar
Kapacinskas, T. J. (2014). Turning the screw on psychobiography: A response to David Tacey’s “James Hillman: The unmaking of a psychologist.” Journal of Analytical Psychology, 59(4), 503–518.Google Scholar
Keats, J. (1968). [Letter] To George and Georgina Keats. In The Norton anthology of English literature (Rev. ed., Vol. 2, Abrams, R. M., Ed.), pp. 578–583). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Keil, C. (1966). Urban blues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, E. F. (2007). Toward a psychology for the 21st century. In Kelly, E. F., Kelly, E. W., Crabtree, A., A. Gauld, M. Grosso, & B. Greyson (Eds.), Irreducible mind: Toward a psychology for the 21st century (pp. 577–644). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Kelly, E. W. (2007). F. W. H. Myers and the empirical study of the mind-body problem. In Kelly, E. F., Kelly, E. W., Crabtree, A., Gauld, A., Grosso, M., & Greyson, B., Irreducible mind: Toward a psychology for the 21st century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Kennedy, R. (2014). The psychic home: Psychoanalysis, consciousness and the human soul. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. (2014). “Boundaries” and “thresholds”: Conceptual models of the musical mind in the history of music psychology. Psychology of Music, 42(5), 671–691.Google Scholar
Kirshner, L. A. (1993). Concepts of reality and psychic reality in psychoanalysis as illustrated by the disagreement between Freud and Ferenczi. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 74(2), 219–230.Google Scholar
Knapp, T. J. (1985). Contributions to the history of psychology: XXXIX. T. V. Moore and his Cognitive psychology of 1939. Psychological Reports, 57(3, Pt 2), 1311–1316.Google Scholar
Koehler, K. (1984). Gibt es noch eine Seele? Thomas von Aquin und die moderne Psychiatrie [Does the soul exist? Thomas Aquinas and modern psychiatry]. Fortschritte der Neurologie, Psychiatrie, 52(10), 329–337.Google Scholar
Kracht, M. & Klein, U. (2014). The grammar of code switching. Journal of Logic Language and Information, 23, 313–329.Google Scholar
Kramer, R. (1996). Introduction: Insight and blindness: Visions of Rank. In A psychology of difference: The American lectures (pp. 3–47). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Also authored notes to the Rank articles)Google Scholar
Kristeller, P. O. (1964). The philosophy of Marsilio Ficino (V. Conant, Trans.). Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
Kugelmann, R. (2011). Psychology and Catholicism: Contested boundaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kugelmann, R. (2019). The theory and practice of Thomas Verner Moore’s Catholic psychiatry and psychotherapy. History of Psychology, 22(2), 186–204.Google Scholar
Kunz, G. (2012). Conscience of a conservative psychologist: Return of the mysteriously elusive psyche. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 12. Available: ipjp.org/online-issues/send/11-the-teaching-of-phenomenology-september-2012/210-conscience-of-a-conservative-psychologist-return-of-the-mysteriously-illusive-psyche-by-george-kunz.Google Scholar
Kusch, M. (1999). Psychological knowledge: A social history and philosophy. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ladd, G. T. (1887). Elements of physiological psychology. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Ladd, G. T. (1892). Psychology as so-called “natural science.” Philosophical Review, 1(1), 24–53.Google Scholar
Ladd, G. T. (1894). Psychology: Descriptive and explanatory. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Ladd, G. T. (1895). Philosophy of mind: An essay in the metaphysics of psychology. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Ladd, G. T. (1899). On certain hindrances to the progress of psychology in America. Psychological Review, 6(2), 121–133.Google Scholar
Laird, J. (1917). Problems of the self. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Laird, J. (2018). The autobiography of a Scots professor. Journal of Scottish Thought, 6, 1–93.Google Scholar
Lake, F. (1961). Foreword. In Ducker, E. N., A Christian therapy for a neurotic world (pp. 7–14). London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Lammers, A. C. (2005). Excerpt from The Introduction to The Jung-White Letters. Jung History, 1(1), 4–7. Available: https://jungpage.org/junghistory/jung-history-volume1-issue1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Lange, F. A. (1881). History of materialism (Vol. 3; E. C. Thomas, Trans.). London: Trübner & Ludgate Hill.Google Scholar
Lashley, K. S. (1923a). The behavioristic interpretation of consciousness I. Psychological Review, 30(4), 237–272.Google Scholar
Lashley, K. S. (1923b). The behavioristic interpretation of consciousness II. Psychological Review, 30(5), 329–353.Google Scholar
Lashley, K. S. (1930). Basic neural mechanisms in behavior. Psychological Review, 37, 1–24.Google Scholar
Laverty, G. (1962). [Review of Emotion and personality]. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 16(3), 239–241.Google Scholar
Leary, D. E. (1982). Immanuel Kant and the development of modern psychology. In Woodward, W. R. & Ash, M. G. (Eds.), The problematic science: Psychology in nineteenth-century thought (pp. 17–42). New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
Leeuw, G. van der. (1930). Phénoménologie de l’âme. Revue d’histoire et de philosophie religieuses, 10(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
Leslie, J. C. (2006). Herbert Spencer’s contributions to behavior analysis: A retrospective review of principles of psychology. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 86(1), 123–129.Google Scholar
Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity (A. Lingis, Trans.). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press. (Originally published 1961)Google Scholar
Lévy-Bruhl, L. (1923). Primitive mentality (L. Clare, Trans.). London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Leyssen, S. & Mülberger, A. (2018). Psychology from a Neo-Thomist perspective. The Louvain-Madrid connection. In Heynickx, R. & Symons, S. (Eds.), So what’s new about scholasticism: How Neo-Thomism helped shape the twentieth century (pp. 181–204). Berlin & Boston, MA: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
Lieberman, E. J. (1985). Acts of will: The life and work of Otto Rank. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, E. J. (1998). Translator’s introduction. In Psychology and the soul: A study of the origin, conceptual evolution, and nature of the soul (G. C. Richter & E. J. Lieberman, Trans., pp. xi–xxvi). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Linschoten, H. (1968). On the way toward a phenomenological psychology: The psychology of William James (W. van de Putte, Trans.). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Lock, G. (2007). Opening address. In Tymieniecka, A.-T. (Ed.), Phenomenology of life from the animal soul to the human mind: Book I, In search of Experience (pp. xiii–xv). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. O. (1906). The fundamental concept of the primitive philosophy. The Monist, 16, 357–382.Google Scholar
MacPherson, H. (1900). Spencer and Spencerism. New York, NY: Doubleday, Page & Co.Google Scholar
Magevney, E. (1894). The new gospel of naturalism. Catholic World, 59, 233–243.Google Scholar
Magevney, E. (1899). The Jesuits as educators. New York, NY: Cathedral Library Association.Google Scholar
Maher, M. (1933). Psychology: Empirical and rational (9th ed.). New York, NY: Longmans, Green and Co. (Originally published 1918)Google Scholar
Marat, J.-P. (1773). A philosophical essay on man: Being an attempt to investigate the principles and laws of the reciprocal influence of the soul on the body. London: J. Ridley & T. Payne.Google Scholar
Marcolungo, F. L. (2021). Empirical psychology: Between reason and experience. In Araujo, S. d. F., Pereira, T. C. R., & Sturm, T. (Eds.), The force of an idea (pp. 51–68). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Marsh, L. (2016). Philosopher of precision and soul: Introducing Walker Percy. Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, 51(4), 983–998.Google Scholar
Marshall, E. (1910, October 2). ‘No immortality of the soul’ says Thomas A. Edison; In fact, he doesn’t believe there is a soul – human beings only an aggregate of cells and the brain only a wonderful machine, says wizard of electricity. The New York Times, pp. M1, 15.Google Scholar
Marshall, H. R. (1909). Consciousness. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Martin, L. J. (1915). An experimental contribution to the investigation of the subconscious. Psychological Review, 22(4), 251–258.Google Scholar
Martyn, H., Barrett, A., & Nicholson, H. D. (2013). Medical students’ understanding of the concept of a soul. Anatomical Sciences Education, 6(6), 410–414.Google Scholar
Mason, P. L. (1992). Soul in the culture of African Americans. Music Educators Journal, 79(3), 49–52.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. (1985). A category of the human mind: The notion of person; the notion of self. In Carrithers, M., Collins, S., & Lukes, S. (Eds.), The category of the human person (pp. 1–25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
May, R. (1996). Foreword. In O. Rank, A psychology of difference: The American lectures (Kramer, R., Ed., pp. xi–xii). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy-Jones, S. (2011). Seeing the unseen, hearing the unsaid: Hallucinations, psychology and St Thomas Aquinas. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 14(4), 353–369.Google Scholar
McCormick, M. (2016). Solar bones. New York, NY: Soho Press.Google Scholar
McCosh, J. (1886). Preface to the American edition. In Ribot, T., The German psychology of to-day: The empirical school (J. M. Baldwin, Trans., pp. vii–xvi). New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
McDougall, W. (1903). Review of the book Human personality and its survival of bodily death. Mind, 12(48), 513–526.Google Scholar
McDougall, W. (1923). Purposive or mechanical psychology? Psychological Review, 30(4), 273–288.Google Scholar
McDougall, W. (1930). William McDougall. In Murchison, C. (Ed.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 1, pp. 191–223). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.Google Scholar
McDougall, W. (1961). Body and mind: A history and a defense of animism. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. (Originally published 1911)Google Scholar
McGill, V. J. (1955). [Review of Le problème de l’âme sur l’objet respectif de la psychologie métaphysique et de la psychologie empirique by Stephan Strasser]. Journal of Philosophy, 52(12), 327–331.Google Scholar
McKenzie, J. G. (1946). Nervous disorder and character: A study in pastoral psychology and psychotherapy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
McKenzie, J. G. (1962). Nervous disorders and religion: A study of souls in the making. New York, NY: Collier Books.Google Scholar
McKinney, F. (1954). [Review of The human person]. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 18(5), 384.Google Scholar
McLuhan, E. (2011a). Introduction. In McLuhan, M. & McLuhan, E., Media and formal cause (pp. 1–10). Houston, TX: NeoPoiesis Press.Google Scholar
McLuhan, E. (2011b). On formal cause. In McLuhan, M. & McLuhan, E., Media and formal cause (pp. 83–139). Houston, TX: NeoPoiesis Press.Google Scholar
McLuhan, M., & McLuhan, E. (1988). Laws of media: The new science. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
McLuhan, M., & McLuhan, E. (2011). Media and formal cause. Houston, TX: NeoPoiesis Press.Google Scholar
McMinn, M. R. (2001). Psychology, theology & care for the soul. In Mc Minn, M. R. & Phillips, T. R. (Eds.), Care for the soul (pp. 9–22). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
McNulty, M. B. (2021). The science of the soul and the unyielding architectonic: Kant versus Wolff on the foundations of psychology. In Araujo, S. d. F., Pereira, T. C. R., & Sturm, T. (Eds.), The force of an idea (pp. 251–269). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Megone, C. (2010). Thomas Aquinas and cognitive therapy. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 17(4), 373–376.Google Scholar
Meissner, W. W. (2000). Reflections on psychic reality. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 81(6), 1117–1138.Google Scholar
Menaker, E. (1998). Otto Rank’s conception of the will. Journal of Religion and Health, 37(1), 9–13.Google Scholar
Menaker, E., & Barbre, C. (1996). Separation, will, and creativity: The wisdom of Otto Rank. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
Mengal, P. (2005). La naissance de la psychologie. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Mercier, D. (1902). The relation of experimental psychology to philosophy. New York, NY: Benziger.Google Scholar
Mercier, D. (1918). Origins of contemporary psychology (W. H. Mitchell, Trans.) (2nd ed.). London: R. and T. Washbourne. (Original work published 1897)Google Scholar
Mercier, D. (1960). Psychology. In Parker, T. L. & Parker, S. A. (Eds. & Trans.), A manual of modern scholastic philosophy (Vol. 1, pp. 160–339, 3rd English ed.). St. Louis, MO: B. Herder. (Originally published 1923)Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Originally published 1945)Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1963). The structure of behavior (A. L. Fisher, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon. (Originally published 1942)Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1969). Phenomenology and psychoanalysis. In Fisher, A. (Ed.), Essential writings of Merleau-Ponty (pp. 81–87). New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Meyer, M. (1911). The fundamental laws of human behavior. Boston, MA: R. G. Badger.Google Scholar
Meyer, M. (1921). Psychology of the other-one. Columbia, MO: Missouri Book Co.Google Scholar
Meyerson, I. (1987a). La personne et son histoire. In Meyerson, I., Écrits 1920–1983: Pour une psychologie historique (pp. 294–301). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (Originally published 1973)Google Scholar
Meyerson, I. (1987b). Les apports de Maurice Leenhardt a la psychologie historique. In Meyerson, I., Écrits 1920–1983: Pour une psychologie historique (pp. 370–376). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (Originally published 1955)Google Scholar
Meylan, N. (2017). Mana: A history of a western category. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Micham, C. (2003). In memoriam Ivan Illich: Critic of professionalized design. Design Issues, 19(4), 26–30.Google Scholar
Michel-Jones, F. (1974). Problèmes de la personne. Cahiers d’études africaines, 14(56), 749–752. Available: persee.fr/doc/cea_0008–0055_1974_num_14_56_2627Google Scholar
Mills, E. S. (1969). George Trumbull Ladd: Pioneer American psychologist. Cleveland, OH: The Press of Case Western Reserve University.Google Scholar
Mills, J. A. (2003). Behaviorism. In Heilbron, J. L. (Ed.), The Oxford companion to the history of modern science (pp. 83–84). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milner, P. M. (1993). The mind and Donald O. Hebb. Scientific American, 268(1), 124–129.Google Scholar
Misiak, H., & Staudt, V. (1954). Catholics in psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Moncher, F. J. (2001). A psychotherapy of virtue: Reflections on St Thomas Aquinas’ theology of moral virtue. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 20(4), 332–341.Google Scholar
Montague, W. P. (1899a). A plea for soul-substance (I). Psychological Review, 6(5), 457–476.Google Scholar
Montague, W. P. (1899b). A plea for soul-substance (II). Psychological Review, 6(6), 606–638.Google Scholar
Montague, W. P. (1945). The human soul and the cosmic mind. Mind, 54(213), 50–64.Google Scholar
Moore, T. (1980). James Hillman: Psychology with soul. Religious Studies Review, 6, 278–285.Google Scholar
Moore, T. (1992). Care of the soul: A guide for cultivating depth and sacredness in everyday life. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Moore, T. V. (1904). A study in reaction time and movement. Psychological Review Monograph Supplement, 6(1).Google Scholar
Moore, T. V. (1910). The process of abstraction: An experimental study. University of California Publications in Psychology, 1, 73–197.Google Scholar
Moore, T. V. (1915). The temporal relations of imagery and meaning. Psychological Review, 22, 177–225.Google Scholar
Moore, T. V. (1917). Psychotherapy. Psychological Bulletin, 14, 236–242.Google Scholar
Moore, T. V. (1919). Hypnotic analogies. Psychological Monographs, 27(4), 387–400.Google Scholar
Moore, T. V. (1924). Dynamic psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.Google Scholar
Moore, T. V. (1933a). The essential psychoses and their fundamental syndromes. Studies in Psychology and Psychiatry from Catholic University of America, 3(3).Google Scholar
Moore, T. V. (1933b). Gestalt psychology and scholastic philosophy (I). New Scholasticism, 7, 298–325.Google Scholar
Moore, T. V. (1934a). Formal causality and the analysis of mental life. Journal of Educational Psychology, 25(6), 401–421.Google Scholar
Moore, T. V. (1934b). Gestalt psychology and scholastic philosophy (II). New Scholasticism, 8, 46–80.Google Scholar
Moore, T. V. (1939). Cognitive psychology. Philadelphia, PA: J. B. Lippincott.Google Scholar
Moore, T. V. (1948). The driving forces of human nature and their adjustment. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Morawski, J. G. (1982). Assessing psychology’s moral heritage through our neglected utopias. American Psychologist, 37(10), 1082–1095.Google Scholar
Moreland, J. P. (1998). Restoring the substance to the soul of psychology. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 26(1), 29–34.Google Scholar
Moreland, J. P., & Rae, S. B. (2000). Body and soul: Human nature and the crisis in ethics. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
Morley, J. (Ed.). (1901). Philosophical dictionary. In The works of Voltaire (Vol. 7, Part 1; W. F. Fleming, Trans.). New York, NY: St. Hubert Guild.Google Scholar
Morphy, F., & Morphy, H. (2020). Locating “mind” (and “soul”) cross-culturally. In Bromhead, H. & Ye, Z. (Eds.), Meaning, life and culture (pp. 249–271). Canberra: ANU Press.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (2008). Psychoanalysis: Its image and public (D. Macey, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity. (Originally published 1961)Google Scholar
Mudrik, L., & Maoz, U. (2014). “Me & my brain”: Exposing neuroscience’s closet dualism. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(2), 211–221.Google Scholar
Mülberger, A. (2012). Wundt contested: The first crisis declaration in psychology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43(2), 434–444.Google Scholar
Mullahy, P. (1948). Oedipus: Myth and complex. New York, NY: Hermitage Press.Google Scholar
Müller-Freienfels, R. (1935). The evolution of modern psychology (W. B. Wolfe, Trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Münsterberg, H. (1899). Psychology and history. Psychological Review, 6(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
Münsterberg, H. (1905). The eternal life. Boston, MA: Houghton, Mifflin and Co.Google Scholar
Münsterberg, H. (1910). Subconscious phenomena. In Subconscious phenomena (pp. 17–32). Boston, MA: Richard G. Badger.Google Scholar
Münsterberg, H. (1914). Psychology. General and applied. New York, NY: Appleton.Google Scholar
Muschinske, D. (1977). The non-White as child: G. Stanley Hall on the education of non-White peoples. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 13(4), 328–336.Google Scholar
Myers, F. H. W. (1885). Human personality. Fortnightly Review, 38, 637–655.Google Scholar
Myers, F. H. W. (1887). Multiplex personality. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 4, 496–514.Google Scholar
Myers, F. H. W. (1892). The subliminal consciousness. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 7, 298–355.Google Scholar
Myers, F. H. W. (1903). Human personality and its survival of bodily death. London: Longmans, Green, & Co.Google Scholar
Nadel, L., & Maurer, A. P. (2020). Recalling Lashley and reconsolidating Hebb. Hippocampus, 30(8), 776–793.Google Scholar
Nauta, R. (2008). Self, sin, and the sacred: Some elements of a select psychology for the care of souls. Pastoral Psychology, 56, 585–592.Google Scholar
Neenan, B. (2000). Thomas Verner Moore: Psychiatrist, educator and monk. New York, NY: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
Neumann, E. (1954). The origins and history of consciousness (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Originally published 1949)Google Scholar
Neumann, E. (1959). The significance of the genetic aspect for analytical psychology. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 4(2), 125–137.Google Scholar
Nichols, A. (2009). The rebellious discipleship of Father Victor White: Theology and psychology in a critic of C. G. Jung. In Titus, C. S. (Ed.), Philosophical psychology: Psychology, emotions, and freedom (pp. 150–175). Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, C. B. (1975). The history of psychoanalytic anthropology: From Freud to Roheim. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University.Google Scholar
Nicholson, I. A. M. (2003). Inventing personality: Gordon Allport and the science of selfhood. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Nordling, W. J., Vitz, P. C., & Titus, C. S. (2020). Introduction to a Catholic Christian meta-model of the person for mental health practice. In Vitz, P. C., Nordling, W. J., & Titus, C. S. (Eds.), A Catholic Christian meta-model of the person: Integration with psychology and mental health practice (pp. 3–19). Sterling, VA: Divine Mercy University Press.Google Scholar
Noun substantive. (n.d.). Oxford English dictionary. Retrieved May 17, 2022, from www.oed.com/view/Entry/256929?redirectedFrom=noun+substantive#eidGoogle Scholar
Ó Cadhain, M. (2016). Graveyard clay (T. Robinson, Trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. (Originally published 1949)Google Scholar
O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2014). Social representations of brain research: Exploring public (dis)engagement with contemporary neuroscience. Science Communication, 36(5), 617–645.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, J. M. (1985). The origins of behaviorism: American psychology, 1870–1920. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Olmsted, D. L. (1970). [Review of the book Mentalism and objectivism in linguistics: The sources of Leonard Bloomfield’s psychology of language by Erwin A. Esper]. Language, 46(1), 31–40.Google Scholar
Osbeck, L. M., & Held, B. S. (2014). Introduction. In Osbeck, L. M. & Held, B. S. (Eds.), Rational intuition: Philosophical roots, scientific investigations (pp. 1–35). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Osborn, M., & Smith, J. A. (2006). Living with a body separate from the self. The experience of the body in chronic benign low back pain: An interpretive phenomenological analysis. Scandinavian Journal of the Caring Sciences, 20(2), 216–222.Google Scholar
Pace, E. A. (1891). Das Relativitätprincip in Herbert Spencer’s psychologischer Entwicklungslehre. Leipzig, Germany: Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar
Pace, E. A. (1893a). Zur Frage der Schwankungen der Aufmerksamkeit nach Versuchen mit der Masson’schen Scheibe. Philosophischen Studien, 8, 388–402.Google Scholar
Pace, E. A. (1893b). Pain contrasts. Proceedings of the American Psychological Association, pp. 25–38.Google Scholar
Pace, E. A. (1894). The growth and spirit of modern psychology. American Catholic Quarterly Review, 19, 522–544.Google Scholar
Pace, E. A. (1895a). The relations of experimental psychology. American Catholic Quarterly Review, 20, 131–162.Google Scholar
Pace, E. A. (1895b). [Review of the book Philosophy of Mind by George Trumbull Ladd]. Catholic University Bulletin, 1(2), 322–323.Google Scholar
Pace, E. A. (1896). St. Thomas and modern thought. Catholic University Bulletin, 2(1), 188–197.Google Scholar
Pace, E. A. (1897). Visceral pain and disease. Psychological Review, 4, 405–409.Google Scholar
Pace, E. A. (1898a). The soul in the system of St. Thomas. Catholic University Bulletin, 4(1), 50–61.Google Scholar
Pace, E. A. (1898b). [Review of the book Les origins de la psychologie contemporaine, by D. Mercier.] Catholic University Bulletin, 4(3), 411–413.Google Scholar
Pace, E. A. (1899). [Review of the book Human immortality: Two supposed objections to the doctrine, by William James.] Catholic University Bulletin, 5(1), 94–96.Google Scholar
Pace, E. A. (1900a). The concept of immortality in the philosophy of St. Thomas. Catholic University Bulletin, 6(1), 3–17.Google Scholar
Pace, E. A. (1900b). The argument of St. Thomas for immortality. Catholic University Bulletin, 6(2), 154–170.Google Scholar
Pace, E. A. (1901a). [Review of the book, Psychology: Empirical and rational, by Michael Maher.] Catholic University Bulletin, 7(1), 78–79.Google Scholar
Pace, E. A. (1901b). A note on binocular rivalry. Psychological Review, 8, 167–168.Google Scholar
Pace, E. A. (1902a). Fluctuations of attention and after-images. Philosophischen Studien, 20, 232–245.Google Scholar
Pace, E. A. (1902b). Psychology. Popular Science Monthly, 61, 110–113.Google Scholar
Pace, E. A. (1905). Locke’s influence on modern thought. Catholic University Bulletin, 11(1), 3–18.Google Scholar
Pace, E. A. (1906). Some modern substitutes for the soul. New York Review, 1, 541–557.Google Scholar
Pace, E. A. (1908). Agnosticism and conciliation. Catholic University Bulletin, 14, 433–442.Google Scholar
Pandora, K. (1997). Rebels within the ranks: Psychologists’ critique of scientific authority and democratic ideals in New Deal America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paris, G. (2014). A response to David Tacey’s “James Hillman: The unmaking of a psychologist.” Journal of Analytical Psychology, 59, 519–523.Google Scholar
Park, K., & Kessler, E. (1988). The concept of psychology. In Skinner, Q., Kessler, E., & Kraye, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge history of Renaissance philosophy (pp. 455–463). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parot, F. (2000). Psychology in the human sciences in France, 1920–1940: Ignace Meyerson’s historical psychology. History of Psychology, 3(2), 104–121.Google Scholar
Pearsall, S. (1995, March 12). Connecticut Q&A: Jeffrey H. Boyd; psychiatrist and explorer of the soul. New York Times, Section 13CN, p. 3.Google Scholar
Peatman, J. G. (1940). Cognitive psychology. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 10(3), 609–611.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1991). Questions concerning certain faculties claimed for man. In Hoopes, J. (Ed.), Peirce on signs (pp. 34–53). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. (Originally published 1868)Google Scholar
Peppis, P. (2014). Sciences of modernism: Ethnography, sexology and psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pereira, T. C. R., & Araujo, S. d. F. (2021). The origins and development of Wolff’s psychology in his German writings. In Araujo, S. d. F., Pereira, T. C. R., & Sturm, T. (Eds.), The force of an idea (pp. 31–49). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Pereira, V., Faísca, L., & de Sá-Saraiva, R. (2012). Immortality of the soul as an intuitive idea: Towards a psychological explanation of the origins of afterlife beliefs. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 12(1–2), 101–127.Google Scholar
Pérez-Álvarez, M. (2018). Thinking psychology beyond the mind and brain: A trans-theoretical approach. Papeles del Psicólogo / Psychologist Papers, 39(3), 161–173.Google Scholar
Perrier, J. L. (1909). The revival of scholastic philosophy in the nineteenth century. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Pillsbury, W. B. (1929). The history of psychology. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2007, January 29). The brain: The mystery of consciousness. Time. Available: content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1580394,00.htmlGoogle Scholar
Pizarroso, N. (2013). Mind’s historicity: Its hidden history. History of Psychology, 16(1), 72–90.Google Scholar
Pizarroso López, N. (2021). Historical psychology. In Pickren, W. E. (Ed.), The Oxford encyclopedia of the history of modern psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pléh, C. (2008). History and theories of the mind. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Pléh, C. (2020). Recovering a French tradition: Ignace Meyerson in focus. Culture & Psychology, 26(3), 578–589.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge: Toward a post-critical philosophy (expanded ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pope Leo XIII, . (1879). Aeterni patris. Available: w2.vatican.va/content/leo-xiii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_04081879_aeterni-patris.htmlGoogle Scholar
Pope Pius X, . (1907). Pascendi dominici gregis. Available: www.vatican.va/content/pius-x/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-x_enc_19070908_pascendi-dominici-gregis.htmlGoogle Scholar
Pörksen, U. (1995). Plastic words: The tyranny of a modular language (U. Mason & D. Cayley, Trans.). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, E. C. (1886). [Review of T. Ribot, German psychology of to-day]. Andover Review.Google Scholar
Pratt, J. B. (1913). The subconscious and religion. Harvard Theological Review, 6(2), 209–228.Google Scholar
Preston, J., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2006). The Godfather of soul. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(5), 482–483.Google Scholar
Preston, J. E., Ritter, R. S., & Hepler, J. (2013). Neuroscience and the soul: Competing explanations for the human experience. Cognition, 127, 31–37.Google Scholar
Proceedings of the 19th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Minneapolis, December 28, 29 and 30, 1910. (1911). Psychological Bulletin, 8(2), 33–62.Google Scholar
Progoff, I. (1956). The death and rebirth of psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Puget, J. (1995). Psychic reality or various realities. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 76(1), 29–34.Google Scholar
Rabinbach, A. (1992). The human motor: Energy, fatigue, and the origins of modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rank, O. (1932). Art and artist: Creative urge and personality development (C. F. Atkinson, Trans.). New York, NY: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
Rank, O. (1945). Will therapy and truth and reality. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Rank, O. (1950). Psychology and the soul (W. D. Turner, Trans.). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. (Originally published 1930)Google Scholar
Rank, O. (1958). Beyond psychology. New York, NY: Dover. (Originally published 1941)Google Scholar
Rank, O. (1971). The double: A psychoanalytic study (H. Tucker, Jr., Trans.). New York, NY: New American Library. (Originally published 1925)Google Scholar
Rank, O. (1996a). Beyond psychoanalysis. In A psychology of difference: The American lectures (Kramer, R., Ed., pp. 228–239). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Originally published 1928)Google Scholar
Rank, O. (1996b). Foundations of a genetic psychology. In A psychology of difference: The American lectures (Kramer, R., Ed., pp. 99–106). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Originally published 1926)Google Scholar
Rank, O. (1996c). The Yale lecture. In A psychology of difference: The American lectures (Kramer, R., Ed., pp. 240–250). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Originally published 1929)Google Scholar
Rank, O. (1996d). Psychoanalysis as general psychology. In A psychology of difference: The American lectures (Kramer, R., Ed., pp. 51–65). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Originally published 1924)Google Scholar
Rank, O. (1998). Psychology and the soul: A study of the origin, conceptual evolution, and nature of the soul (G. C. Richter & E. J. Lieberman, Trans.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Originally published 1930)Google Scholar
Reed, E. S. (1997). From soul to mind: The emergence of psychology, from Erasmus Darwin to William James. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Reimers, A. J. (2006). The soul of the person: A contemporary philosophical psychology. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Reisenzein, R. (2006). Arnold’s theory of emotion in historical perspective. Cognition and Emotion, 20(7), 920–951.Google Scholar
Ribot, T. (1874). English psychology. New York, NY: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
Ribot, T. (1886). The German psychology of to-day: The empirical school (J. M. Baldwin, Trans.). New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Richards, G. (1997). “Race,” racism, and psychology: Towards a reflexive history. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Richards, G. (2010). Putting psychology in its place: Critical historical perspectives (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Richards, G. (2011). Psychology, religion, and the nature of the soul: A historical entanglement. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Richards, R. J. (1980). Christian Wolff’s prolegomena to empirical and rational psychology: Translation and commentary. Proceedings of the America Philosophical Society, 124(3), 227–239.Google Scholar
Richert, R. A., & Harris, P. L. (2006). The ghost in my body: Children’s developing concept of the soul. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 6(3–4), 409–427.Google Scholar
Richert, R. A., & Harris, P. L. (2008). Dualism revisited: Body vs. mind vs. soul. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 8, 99–115.Google Scholar
Richert, R. A., & Smith, E. (2012). The essence of soul concepts: How soul concepts influence ethical reasoning across religious affiliation. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 2(2), 161–176.Google Scholar
Riggs, M. M. (1955). [Review of The human person, an approach to an integral theory of personality]. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 50(2), 277–279.Google Scholar
Rivière, P. G. (1997). Carib soul matters – since Fock. Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford, 28(2), 139–148.Google Scholar
Roback, A. A. (1923). Behaviorism and psychology. Cambridge, MA: University Bookstore.Google Scholar
Roback, A. A. (1964). A history of American psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Collier Books.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. N. (1982). Toward a science of human nature: Essays on the psychologies of Mill, Hegel, Wundt, and James. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. N. (2010). Consciousness: The first frontier. Theory & Psychology, 20(6), 781–793.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. N. (2011). Minds, brains, and brains in vats. In Baker, M. C. & Goetz, S. (Eds.), The soul hypothesis: Investigations into the existence of the soul (pp. 46–67). New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. N. (2013). Historiography in psychology: A note on ignorance. Theory & Psychology, 23(6), 819–828.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. R. (2010). Fechner’s “inner psychophysics.” History of Psychology, 13(4), 424–433.Google Scholar
Robischon, T. (1967). Montague, William Pepperell (1873–1953). Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved July 31, 2019 from Encyclopedia.com: encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/montague-william-pepperell-1873-1953Google Scholar
Rodkey, E. N. (2011). Last of the Mohicans? James McCosh and psychology “old” and “new.” History of Psychology, 14(4), 335–355.Google Scholar
Rodkey, E. N. (2015). Magda Arnold and the human person: A mid-century case study on the relationship between psychology and religion. Doctoral dissertation. Toronto: York University.Google Scholar
Rohde, E. (1925). Psyche: The cult of souls and belief in immortality among the Greeks (8th ed.; W. B. Hillis, Trans.). London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.Google Scholar
Romanes, G. J. (1888). Mental evolution in animals. London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Co.Google Scholar
Romanyshyn, R. D. (2007). The wounded researcher: Research with soul in mind. New Orleans, LA: Spring Journal Books.Google Scholar
Romanyshyn, R. D. (2015). Conversations in the gap between mind and soul: Grammatical reflections “in (the) place(s) of thinking.” The Humanistic Psychologist, 43(1), 109–118.Google Scholar
Rose, A. C. (2016). William McDougall, American psychologist: A reconsideration of nature-nurture debates in the interwar United States. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 52(4), 325–348.Google Scholar
Ross, D. (1972). G. Stanley Hall: The psychologist as prophet. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rothman, A., & Coyle, A. (2018). Toward a framework for Islamic psychology and psychotherapy: An Islamic model of the soul. Journal of Religion and Health, 57(5), 1731–1744.Google Scholar
Rowland, S. (2008). Psyche and the arts: Jungian approaches to music, architecture, literature, painting and film. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rudin, J. (1968). Psychotherapy and religion (D. Reinecke & P. C. Bailey, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Rydberg, A. (2021). Wolff and the beginnings of experimental psychology in the eighteenth century. In Araujo, S. d. F., Pereira, T. C. R., & Sturm, T. (Eds.), The force of an idea (pp. 231–250). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Rylance, R. (2000). Victorian psychology and British culture, 1850–1880. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson’s University Library.Google Scholar
Saban, M. (2014). A response to David Tacey’s “James Hillman: The unmaking of a psychologist.” Journal of Analytical Psychology, 59(4), 524–528.Google Scholar
Salman, D. H. (1974). Body and soul. In McLean, G. F. (Ed.), Thomas and Bonaventure: A septicentenary commemoration (pp. 55–63). Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Samelson, F. (1981). Struggle for scientific authority: The reception of Watson’s behaviorism, 1913–1920. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 17(3), 399–425.Google Scholar
Sappenfield, B. R. (1955). [Review of The human person: an approach to an integral theory of personality]. Psychological Bulletin, 52(1), 88–90.Google Scholar
Sardello, R. (1992). Facing the world with soul. Hudson, NY: Lindesfarne Press.Google Scholar
Sardello, R. (1995). Love and the soul: Creating a future for earth. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Sardello, R. (2012). The power of soul: Living the twelve virtues. Benson, NC: Goldenstone Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, M. J. (2011). A new turn in theology: The material turn. New Theology Review, 24, 61–70.Google Scholar
Scarfone, D. (1996). Traumatisme, mémoire et fantasme: la réalité psychique. Santé mentale au Québec, 21(1), 163–176.Google Scholar
Schenk, R. (1992). The soul of beauty: A psychological investigation of appearance. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
Schenk, R. (2012). American soul: A cultural narrative. New Orleans, LA: Spring Journal Books.Google Scholar
Schmisek, B. (2013). Resurrection of the flesh or resurrection from the dead: Implications for theology. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
Scholem, G. (2014). Gershom Scholem: Obituary for Erich Neumann. Erel Shalit. www.erelshalit.com/2014/07/gershom-scholem-obituary-for-erich.htmlGoogle Scholar
Schultz, D. (1981). A history of modern psychology (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, R. C. (1999). Releasing the soul: Psychotherapy as a spiritual practice. In Walsh, F. (Ed.), Spiritual resources in family therapy (pp. 223–239). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Searles, H. (1960). The nonhuman environment in normal development and in schizophrenia. New York, NY: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Seif, N. G. (1980). Otto Rank: On human evil. Doctoral dissertation. New York, NY: Yeshiva University.Google Scholar
Severson, R. (2013). A Catholic soul psychology. Benson, NC: Goldenstone Press.Google Scholar
Shamdasani, S. (1993). Automatic writing and the discovery of the unconscious. Spring, 54, 100–131.Google Scholar
Shamdasani, S. (2000). Misunderstanding Jung: The afterlife of legends. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 45(3), 459–472.Google Scholar
Shamdasani, S. (2003). Jung and the making of modern psychology: The dream of a science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shamdasani, S. (2012). C. G. Jung: A biography in books. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Shamdasani, S. (2015). “SW” and CG Jung: Mediumship, psychiatry and serial exemplarity. History of Psychiatry, 26(3), 288–302.Google Scholar
Sheldon, W. H. (1936). Psychology and the Promethean will: A constructive study of the acute common problem of education, medicine, and religion. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Shields, S. (2006). Magda B. Arnold’s life and work in context. Cognition & Emotion, 20(7), 902–919.Google Scholar
Shields, S. A., & Fields, R. M. (2003). Obituaries: Magda B Arnold (1903–2002). American Psychologist, 58(5), 403–404.Google Scholar
Shook, J. R. (2005). Fullerton, George Stuart (1859–1925). In Shook, J. R. (Ed.), Dictionary of modern American philosophers (pp. 877–878). Bristol: Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Sipiora, M. (Ed.). (2014). Imagining psychological life: Philosophical, psychological and poetic reflections: A festschrift in honor of Robert D. Romanyshyn, Ph.D. Lake Charles, LA: Trivium Books.Google Scholar
Slattery, D. P. & Corbett, L. (2000). Depth psychology: Meditations in the field. Einsiedeln, Switzerland: Daimon Verlag.Google Scholar
Smiles, S. (1863). Self help; with illustrations of character and conduct. Boston, MA: Ticknor and Fields.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1997). The Norton history of the human sciences. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (2005). The history of psychological categories. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36(1), 55–94.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (2006). [Reviews of the books La naissance de la psychologie by P. Mengal and Les sciences de l’âme XVIe–XVIIIe]. History of the Human Sciences, 22(1), 134–142.Google Scholar
Snell, B. (1953). The discovery of the mind: The Greek origins of European thought. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (1974). Body and soul in Aristotle. Philosophy, 49, 63–89.Google Scholar
Soul. (n.d.). In Oxford English dictionary. Retrieved May 2, 2022, from oed.com/view/Entry/185083?rskey=6z3CaC&result=1&isAdvanced=false#eidGoogle Scholar
Souling. (n.d.). In Oxford English dictionary. Retrieved May 2, 2022, from oed.com/view/Entry/185084?rskey=AKmEZR&result=1#eidGoogle Scholar
Soul and science. (1877). City Jackdaw, 2(91), 309.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1892). The development hypothesis. In Essays, scientific, political, and speculative (Vol. 1, pp. 1–7). New York, NY: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
Spilka, B., Hood, R. W., Hunsberger, B., & Gorsuch, R. (2003). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Spillius, E. B. (1996). Panel report: The concept of psychic reality in the different theoretical currents of today. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 77, 85–87.Google Scholar
Spinks, G. S. (1967). Psychology and religion: An introduction to contemporary views. Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
Springsteen, B. (2020). I’ll see you in my dreams. [Recorded by B. Springsteen and the E Street Band]. On Letter to you. Columbia.Google Scholar
Staum, M. S. (2011). Nature and nurture in French social sciences, 1859–1914. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, W. (1917). Hugo Münsterberg: In memoriam. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1(2), 186–188.Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1939). Psychology and the science of science. Psychological Bulletin, 36(4), 221–263.Google Scholar
Stich, S. (1983). From folk psychology to cognitive science: The case against belief. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stirling, J. H. (1898). The secret of Hegel (new ed.). Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Stoffers, M. (2003). Münsterberg’s nightmare: Psychology and history in fin-de-siècle Germany and America. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 39(2), 163–182.Google Scholar
Stoljar, D. (2021). Physicalism. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2021 Ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/physicalism/Google Scholar
Strasser, S. (1957). The soul in metaphysical and empirical psychology (H. T. Koren, Trans.). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, E. B. (1953). Reason and unreason in psychological medicine. London: H. K. Lewis & Co.Google Scholar
Street, J. R. (1899). A genetic study of immortality. Pedagogical Seminary, 6, 267–313.Google Scholar
Stuckrad, K. v. (2022). A cultural history of the soul: Europe and North America from 1870 to the present. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Suchting, W. A. (1991). Introduction: Translation Hegel’s Logic. In Hegel, G., The encyclopaedia logic: Part I of the encyclopaedia of the philosophical sciences with the zusätze (T. F. Geraets, W. A. Suchting, & H. S. Harris, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Sullivan, M. (2001). Finding pain between minds and bodies. Clinical Journal of Pain, 17(2), 146–156.Google Scholar
Swan, W. (2008). C. G. Jung’s psychotherapeutic technique of active imagination in historical context. Psychoanalysis and History, 10(2), 185–204.Google Scholar
Tacey, D. (1998). Twisting and turning with James Hillman: From anima to world soul, from academia to pop. In Casement, A. (Ed.), Post-Jungians today (pp. 215–234). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tacey, D. (2014a). James Hillman: The unmaking of a psychologist Part one: His legacy. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 59(4), 467–485.Google Scholar
Tacey, D. (2014b). James Hillman: The unmaking of a psychologist Part two: The problem of the puer. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 59(4), 486–502.Google Scholar
Tacey, D. (2014c). The author replies. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 59(4), 529–530.Google Scholar
Taliaferro, C. (2011). The soul of the matter. In Baker, M. C. & Goetz, S. (Eds.), The soul hypothesis: Investigations into the existence of the soul (pp. 26–40). New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
Tart, C. T. (1975). Some assumptions of orthodox, western psychology. In Tart, C. T. (Ed.). Transpersonal psychologies (pp. 59–111). New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Taves, A. (2003). Religious experience and the divisible self: William James (and Frederic Myers) as theorist(s) of religion. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 71(2), 303–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, E. (1992). The case for a uniquely American Jamesian tradition in psychology. In Donnelly, M. (Ed.), Reinterpreting the legacy of William James (pp. 3–28). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Taylor, E. (1996a). William James on consciousness beyond the margins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, E. (1996b). The new Jung scholarship. Psychoanalytical Review, 83(4), 547–568. Retrieved from search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pph& AN=PSAR.083.0547A&authtype=sso&custid=s9008655&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s9008655Google Scholar
Taylor, E. (1999). Shadow culture: Psychology and spirituality in America. Washington, DC: Counterpoint.Google Scholar
Taylor, E. (2009). The mystery of personality: A history of psychodynamic theories. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Taylor, E. (2011). William James’s radical empiricism: Did E. B. Holt get it right? In Charles, E. P. (Ed.), A new look at new realism (pp. 105–126). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Teo, T. (2002). Friedrich Albert Lange on neo-Kantianism, socialist Darwinism, and a psychology without a soul. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 38(3), 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teo, T. (2005). The critique of psychology: From Kant to postcolonial theory. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Terman, L. M. (1905). A study in precocity and prematuration. American Journal of Psychology, 16, 147–183.Google Scholar
Textor, M. (2021). The disappearance of the soul and the turn against metaphysics: Austrian philosophy 1874–1918. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thayer, H. S. (1970). [Review of The radical empiricism of William James by John Wild]. The Journal of Philosophy, 67(2), 52–55.Google Scholar
The report of St. Andrew’s Hospital for Nervous and Mental Disorders, at Northampton, for the upper and middle classes, from January 1st, 1955, to December 31st, 1955. (1956). [Publisher not identified]. Available: https://wellcomelibrary.org/item/b30300447Google Scholar
Thompson, B. (2004, October 19). Former Southwestern Seminary prof John W. Drakeford dies. Baptist Press. Available: baptistpress.com/resource-library/news/former-southwestern-seminary-prof-john-w-drakeford-dies/Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. (1913). Educational psychology, Vol 1: The original nature of man. New York, NY: Teachers College.Google Scholar
Thurman, H. (1934). [Review of the books, The Chances of Surviving Death by William Pepperell Montague, and Immortality and the Cosmic Process by Shailer Mathews]. The Journal of Religion, 14(4), 485.Google Scholar
Titchener, E. B. (1909). Experimental psychology of the thought-processes. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Titchener, E. B. (1914). On “Psychology as the behaviorist views it.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 53, 1–17. Available: psychclassics.yorku.ca/Titchener/watson.htmGoogle Scholar
Titus, C. S. (2017). Aquinas, Seligman, and positive psychology: A Christian approach to the use of the virtues in psychology. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(5), 447–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titus, C. S., Vitz, P. C., & Nordling, W. J. (2020). Personal wholeness (unity). In Vitz, P. C., Nordling, W. J., & Titus, C. S. (Eds.), A Catholic Christian meta-model of the person: Integration with psychology and mental health practice (pp. 145–168). Sterling, VA: Divine Mercy University Press.Google Scholar
Todd, A. J. (1916). Primitive notions of the “self.” American Journal of Psychology, 27(2), 171–202.Google Scholar
Turner, W. D. (1950). Translator’s preface. In Psychology and the soul (W. D. Turner, Trans., pp. v–viii). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, P. (2016). The pursuit of the soul: Psychoanalysis, soul-making and the Christian tradition. London: Bloomsbury T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Tylor, E. B. (1883). Primitive culture (3rd American ed.). New York, NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Ulanov, A., & Ulanov, B. (1975). Religion and the unconscious. Philadelphia, PA: The Westminster Press.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, J. H. (1952). The human body and the significance of human movement. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 13(2), 159–183.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, J. H. (1970). Things: Four metabletic reflections. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, J. H. (1972). A different existence: Principles of phenomenological psychopathology. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, P., & Sullivan, M. (2021). Metaphysics. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2021 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/metaphysics/Google Scholar
Vande Kemp, H. (1982). The tension between psychology and theology: An anthropological solution. Journal of Psychology & Theology, 10(3), 205–211.Google Scholar
Vande Kemp, H. (1984). Psychology and theology in Western thought 1672–1965. White Plains, NY: Kraus International.Google Scholar
Vande Kemp, H. (1992). G. Stanley Hall and the Clark School of Religious Psychology. American Psychologist, 47(2), 290–298.Google Scholar
Vidal, F. (2009). Brainhood, anthropological figure of modernity. History of the Human Sciences, 22(1), 5–36.Google Scholar
Vidal, F. (2011). The sciences of the soul: The early modern origins of psychology (S. Brown, Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Viney, L. (1969). Self: The history of a concept. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 5(4), 349–359.Google Scholar
Vitz, P. C. (2020). Basic psychological support for the Catholic Christian meta-model of the person. In Vitz, P. C., Nordling, W. J., & Titus, C. S. (Eds.), A Catholic Christian meta-model of the person: Integration with psychology and mental health practice (pp. 77–99). Sterling, VA: Divine Mercy University Press.Google Scholar
Vitz, P. C., Nordling, W. J., & Titus, C. S. (Eds.). (2020). A Catholic Christian meta-model of the person: Integration with psychology and mental health practice. Sterling, VA: Divine Mercy University Press.Google Scholar
Walters, A. (1954). Contemporary personality theory. In Arnold, M. A. & Gasson, J. A. (Eds.), The human person: An approach to an integral theory of personality (pp. 101–115). New York, NY: Ronald Press Co.Google Scholar
Ward, J. (1918). Psychological principles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, K. (1992). Defending the soul. Oxford: Oneworld.Google Scholar
Warren, H. C., Calkins, M. W., Dunlap, K., Gardiner, H. N., & Ruckmich, C. A. (1918). Report: Definitions and delimitations of psychological terms prepared by a committee of the American Psychological Association. Psychological Bulletin, 15(3), 89–95.Google Scholar
Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20(2), 158–177.Google Scholar
Watson, J. B. (1917). Does Holt follow Freud? Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and the Scientific Methods, 14, 85–93.Google Scholar
Weidman, N. M. (1999). Constructing scientific psychology: Karl Lashley’s mind-brain debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, A. P. (1919). The mind and the man-within. Psychological Review, 26(5), 327–334.Google Scholar
Weiss, A. P. (1924). Behaviorism and behavior. Psychological Review, 31(1), 32–50, 118–149.Google Scholar
Weiss, A. P. (1925). A theoretical basis of human behavior. Columbus, OH: R. G. Adams & Co.Google Scholar
Weld, H. P. (1943). Edmund Smith Conklin: 1884–1942. American Journal of Psychology, 46(1), 140–141.Google Scholar
Weldon, C. (2010). Types of Thomists: Victor White’s use of Aquinas as exemplar of a dialectical synthesis. In Stein, M. & Jones, R. A. (Eds.), Cultures and identities in transition: Jungian perspectives (pp. 175–183). London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Wellman, H. M., & Johnson, C. N. (2008). Developing dualism: From intuitive understanding to transcendental ideas. In Antonietti, A., Corradini, A., & Lowe, J. (Eds.), Psycho-physical dualism today: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 3–35). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wentworth, P. A. (1999). The moral of her story: Exploring the philosophical and religious commitments in Mary Whiton Calkins’ self-psychology. History of Psychology, 2(2), 119–131.Google Scholar
Whitaker, J. A. (2016). In search of the soul in Amazonia. Anthropos, 111(1), 201–205.Google Scholar
White, C. G. (2009). Unsettled minds: Psychology and the American search for spiritual assurance, 1830–1940. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
White, S. H. (2002). G. Stanley Hall: From philosophy to developmental psychology. In Pickren, W. E. & Dewsbury, D. A. (Eds.), Evolving perspectives on the history of psychology (pp. 279–302). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
White, V. (1956). God the unknown. London: Harvill Press.Google Scholar
White, V. (1960). Soul and psyche: An enquiry into the relationship of psychotherapy and religion. London: Collins and Harwell Press.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, H. (2006). Reasoning about dead agents: A cross-cultural perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(5), 485–486.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1989). Soul and mind: Linguistic evidence for ethnopsychology and cultural history. American Anthropologist, 91(1), 41–58.Google Scholar
Wilhelmsen, F. D. (1973). The paradoxical structure of existence. Irving, TX: University of Dallas Press.Google Scholar
Will, A. S. (1911). Life of James Cardinal Gibbons. Baltimore, MD: John Murphy.Google Scholar
Willard, D. (1998). Spiritual disciplines, spiritual formation, and the restoration of the soul. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 26(1), 101–109.Google Scholar
Willey, T. E. (1978). Back to Kant: The revival of Kantianism in German social and historical thought, 1860–1914. Cleveland, OH: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Winer, G. A., Cottrell, J. E., Gregg, V., Fourier, J. S., & Bica, L. A. (2002). Fundamentally misunderstanding visual perception: Adults’ beliefs in visual emissions. American Psychologist, 57(6–7), 417–424.Google Scholar
Wood, A. N. (2014). The immateriality of the intellect in Thomas Aquinas’ philosophical psychology. In Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences (Vol. 74, Issue 9–A(E)).Google Scholar
Woodworth, R. S. (1921). Psychology: A study of mental life. Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
Worcester, E., McComb, S., & Coriat, I. H. (1908). Religion and medicine: The moral control of nervous disorders. New York, NY: Moffat, Yard & Co.Google Scholar
Wozniak, R. H. (1993). Max Meyer and The fundamental laws of human behavior. In Meyer, M., The fundamental laws of human behavior (pp. vii–xxi). London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Wozniak, R. H. (1994). Behaviourism: The early years. In Wozniak, R. H. (Ed.), Reflex, habit and implicit response: The early elaboration of theoretical and methodological behaviourism (pp. ix–xxxii). London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Yerkes, R. M. (1914). The study of human behavior. Science, 39, 625–633.Google Scholar
Young, J. L. (2016). G. Stanley Hall, child study, and the American public. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 177(6), 195–208.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Robert Kugelmann, University of Dallas
  • Book: The Soul in Soulless Psychology
  • Online publication: 10 February 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009301220.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Robert Kugelmann, University of Dallas
  • Book: The Soul in Soulless Psychology
  • Online publication: 10 February 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009301220.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Robert Kugelmann, University of Dallas
  • Book: The Soul in Soulless Psychology
  • Online publication: 10 February 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009301220.011
Available formats
×