References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 July 2021
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Sovereignty Cartel , pp. 183 - 198Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Aalberts, Tanja 2004. “The Sovereignty Game States Play: (Quasi-)states in the International Order,” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 17: 245–257.Google Scholar
Abraham, Itty and van Schendel, Willem 2005. Illicit Flows and Criminal Things: States, Borders, and the Other Side of Globalization. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Abrahamian, Atossa Araxia 2015. The Cosmopolites: The Coming of the Global Citizen. Columbia Global Reports.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ahrensdorf, Peter 2000. “The Fear of Death and the Longing for Immortality: Hobbes and Thucydides on Human Nature and the Problem of Anarchy,” American Political Science Review 94: 579–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Atawneh, Muhammad 2009. “Is Saudi Arabia a Theocracy? Religion and Governance in Contemporary Saudi Arabia,” Middle Eastern Studies 45: 721–737.Google Scholar
Alchian, Armen 1991. “Property Rights,” in Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray, and Newman, Peter, eds. The New Palgrave: The World of Economics. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Allan, Bentley 2018. Scientific Cosmology and International Orders. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allison, Graham and Halperin, Morton H. 1972. “Bureaucratic Politics: A Paradigm and Some Policy Implications,” World Politics 24: 40–79.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel and Genco, Stephen 1977. “Clouds, Clocks, and the Study of Politics,” World Politics 29: 489–522.Google Scholar
Ambrosius, Lloyd 1991. Wilsonian Statecraft: Theory and Practice of Liberal Internationalism during World War I. Scholarly Resources.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. Verso.Google Scholar
Andreas, Peter 2000. Border Games: Policing the U.S.–Mexico Divide. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Andreas, Peter 2004. “Illicit International Political Economy: The Clandestine Side of Globalization,” Review of International Political Economy 11: 641–652.Google Scholar
Associated Press 2019. “Many Latin American Governments Support Venezuela’s Guaido,” New York Times, January 23.Google Scholar
Baker, Ray Stannard 1922. Woodrow Wilson and World Settlement, Vol. 1. Doubleday, Page.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin 1995. Jihad vs. McWorld: How Globalism and Tribalism Are Reshaping the World. Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Barbey, Christophe 2015. “Non-Militarisation: Countries without Armies,” The Ålands Islands Peace Institute.Google Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel 1998. “The Evolution of the Constitution of Sovereignty and the Emergence of Human Rights Norms,” Millennium 27: 229–252.Google Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel 2003. Social Construction and the Logic of Money: Financial Predominance and International Economic Leadership. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel 2010. Realist Constructivism: Rethinking International Relations Theory. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel 2013. International Organization: Theories and Institutions, 2nd ed. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel 2015a. “On the Heuristic Use of Formal Models in International Relations Theory,” International Studies Review 17: 617–634.Google Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel 2015b. “Racing All Over the Place: A Dispersion Model of International Regulatory Competition,” European Journal of International Relations 21: 171–193.Google Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel and Cronin, Bruce 1994. “The State and the Nation: Changing Norms and the Rules of Sovereignty in International Relations,” International Organization 48: 107–130.Google Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel and DeSombre, Elizabeth R. 2013. Saving Global Fisheries: Reducing Fishing Capacity to Promote Sustainability. The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel and Weitsman, Patricia A. 2019. “Realist Institutionalism and the Institutional Mechanisms of Power Politics,” in Wivel, Anders and Paul, T. V., eds. International Institutions and Power Politics. Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond 2005. “Power in International Politics,” International Organization 59: 39–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, John, Goldstein, Judith, Josling, Timothy, and Steinberg, Richard 2006. The Evolution of the Trade Regime: Politics, Law, and Economics of the GATT and the WTO. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision 2010. Basel III: A Global Regulatory Framework for More Resilient Banks and Banking Systems. Bank for International Settlements.Google Scholar
Baumgold, Deborah 2005. “Hobbes’s and Locke’s Contract Theories: Political not Metaphysical,” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8: 289–308.Google Scholar
Bellamy, Alex 2014. Responsibility to Protect: A Defense. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla 2005. “Borders, Boundaries, and Citizenship,” PS: Political Science & Politics 38: 673–677.Google Scholar
Berman, Harold 1983. Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Biersteker, Thomas and Weber, Cynthia, eds. 1996. State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bliss, F. Allen 1994. “Rethinking Restrictions on Cabotage: Moving to Free Trade in Passenger Aviation,” Suffolk Transnational Law Review 17: 382.Google Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel 1995. “Customary (and Not So Customary) International Environmental Law,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 3: 105.Google Scholar
Bodin, Jean 1945 (1566). Method for the Easy Comprehension of History. Translated by Beatrice Reynolds. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Boland, Vincent 2017. “Ireland’s ‘De-Globalized’ Data Calculate a Smaller Economy,” Financial Times, July 18.Google Scholar
Boxer, C. R. 1974. The Anglo-Dutch Wars of the Seventeenth Century, 1652–1674. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.Google Scholar
Branch, Jordan 2012. “‘Colonial Reflection’ and Territoriality: The Peripheral Origins of Sovereign Statehood,” European Journal of International Relations 18: 277–297.Google Scholar
Bratspies, Rebecca and Miller, Russell, eds. 2006. Transboundary Harm in International Law: Lessons from the Trail Smelter Arbitration. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Broadhead, Lee-Anne 2002. International Environmental Politics: The Limits of Green Diplomacy. Lynne Reinner.Google Scholar
Brysk, Alison and Shafir, Gershon, eds. 2004. People Out of Place: Globalization, Human Rights, and the Citizenship Gap. Routledge.Google Scholar
Buchheit, Lee 1978. Secession: The Legitimacy of Self-Determination. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Burch, Kurt 1998. “Property” and the Making of the International System. Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Burch, Kurt 2000. “Changing the Rules: Reconceiving Change in the Westphalian System,” International Studies Review 2: 181–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter, eds. 1991. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burdick, Alan 2017. Why Time Flies: A Mostly Scientific Investigation. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Burgerman, Susan 2001. Moral Victories: How Activists Provoke Multilateral Action. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Burgess, John 1890. Political Science and Comparative Constitutional Law. Volume I: Sovereignty and Liberty. Ginn & Co.Google Scholar
Burley, Anne-Marie 1993. “Regulating the World: Multilateralism, International Law, and the Projection of the New Deal Regulatory State,” in Ruggie, John Gerard, ed., Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Capoccia, Giovanni and Kelemen, R. Daniel 2007. “The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism,” World Politics 59: 341–369.Google Scholar
Caulkins, Jonathan, Reuter, Peter H., Iguchi, Martin Y., and Chiesa, James 2005. How Goes the “War on Drugs”? Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
Cerny, Philip 1998. “Neomedievalism, Civil War and the New Security Dilemma: Globalisation as Durable Disorder,” Civil Wars 1: 36–64.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram and Chayes, Antonia Handler 1993. “On Compliance,” International Organization 47: 175–205.Google Scholar
Chulov, Martin 2018. “‘We Will Get Him: The Long Hunt for ISIS Leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi,” The Guardian, January 15.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald 1959. “The Federal Communications Commission,” Journal of Law and Economics 2: 1–40.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost,” Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.Google Scholar
Coggins, Bridget 2014. Power Politics and State Formation in the Twentieth Century: The Dynamics of Recognition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cooley, Alexander and Spruyt, Hendrik 2009. Contracting States: Sovereign Transfers in International Relations. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cronin, Bruce 1999. Community under Anarchy: Transnational Identity and the Evolution of Cooperation. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Croucher, Sheila 2018. Globalization and Belonging: The Politics of Identity in a Changing World. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
D’Amato, Anthony and Falk, Richard Anderson 1971. The Concept of Custom in International Law. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
DeSombre, Elizabeth R. 2005. “Fishing Under Flags of Convenience: Using Market Power to Increase Participation in International Regulation,” Global Environmental Politics 5: 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeSombre, Elizabeth R. 2006. Flagging Standards: Globalization and Environmental, Safety, and Labor Regulations at Sea. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dimitrov, Radoslav 2020. “Empty Institutions in Global Environmental Politics,” International Studies Review 22: 626–650. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viz029.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel 2007. All Politics Is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ekelund, Robert and Tollison, Robert 1981. Mercantilism as a Rent-Seeking Society: Economic Regulation in Historical Perspective. Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Fairbank, John, ed. 1968. The Chinese World Order: Traditional China’s Foreign Relations. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, Graham and Thorne, John 2005. “Where Have All the Flowers Gone? Evaluation of the Taliban Crackdown against Opium Poppy Cultivation in Afghanistan,” International Journal of Drug Policy 16: 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James 1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War,” International Organization 49: 379–414.Google Scholar
Ferrero, Guglielmo 1941. The Reconstruction of Europe: Talleyrand and the Congress of Vienna, 1814–1815. G.P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha 1996. National Interests in International Society. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha 2004. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs About the Use of Force. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization 52: 887–917.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil, Polyakova, Alina, and Sandholtz, Wayne 2012. “European Integration, Nationalism, and European Identity,” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 50: 106–122.Google Scholar
Franklin, Julian 1973. Jean Bodin and the Rise of Absolutist Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friedheim, Robert, ed. 2001. Toward A Sustainable Whaling Regime. University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Friedrichs, Jörg 2007. Fighting Terrorism and Drugs: Europe and International Police Cooperation. Routledge.Google Scholar
Gardam, Judith 1993. Non-Combatant Immunity as a Norm of International Humanitarian Law. M. Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Gee, Graham and Young, Alison 2016. “Regaining Sovereignty? Brexit, the UK Parliament and the Common Law,” European Public Law 22: 131–147.Google Scholar
Geitner, Paul 2004. “EU Signs $1.25B Deal with Philip Morris,” Associated Press, July 9.Google Scholar
Gilley, Bruce 2006. “The Meaning and Measure of State Legitimacy: Results for 72 Countries,” European Journal of Political Research 45: 499–525.Google Scholar
Glaeser, Edward and Shleifer, Andrei 2001. “The Rise of the Regulatory State,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 8650. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Goddard, Stacie 2009. “When Right makes Might: How Prussia Overturned the European Balance of Power,” International Security 33: 110–142.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, Kahler, Miles, Keohane, Robert O., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie, eds. 2001. Legalization and World Politics. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gore, Charles 2000. “The Rise and Fall of the Washington Consensus as a Paradigm for Developing Countries,” World Development 28: 789–804.Google Scholar
Grigorescu, Alexandru 2007. “Transparency of International Organizations: The Roles of Member States, International Bureaucracies, and Nongovernmental Organizations,” International Studies Quarterly 51: 625–648.Google Scholar
Gros, Daniel 2013. “Banking Union with a Sovereign Virus: The Self-Serving Treatment of Sovereign Debt,” Intereconomics 48: 93–97.Google Scholar
Gross, Leo 1948. “The Peace of Westphalia, 1648–1948,” American Journal of International Law 42: 20–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grovogui, Siba N’Zatioula 1996. Sovereigns, Quasi Sovereigns, and Africans: Race and Self-Determination in International Law. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, Lloyd 2000. Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Guardian, 2019. “Chakrabarti Defends Jeremy Corbyn’s Venezuela Remarks,” The Guardian, February 3.Google Scholar
Guilfoyle, Douglas 2009. Shipping Interdiction and the Law of the Sea. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gulbrandsen, Lars 2010. Transnational Environmental Governance: The Emergence and Effects of the Certification of Forests and Fisheries. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano 1998. Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold. Routledge.Google Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano 2000. “A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations,” European Journal of International Relations 6: 147–182.Google Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano 2005. “The Concept of Power: A Constructivist Analysis,” Millennium 33: 495–521.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst 1997. Nationalism, Liberalism, and Progress, Vol. 1: The Rise and Decline of Nationalism. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Translated by McCarthy, Thomas. Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Rodney Bruce 1998. National Collective Identity: Social Constructs and International Systems. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Harper, Kyle 2011. Slavery in the Late Roman World, AD 275–425. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haufler, Virginia 2001. A Public Role for the Private Sector: Industry Self-Regulation in a Global Economy. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. F. W. 1974. Hegel: The Essential Writings, Weiss, Frederick, ed. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Helleiner, Eric 2014. Forgotten Foundations of Bretton Woods: International Development and the Making of the Postwar Order. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis 1979. How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Holland, Ben 2010. “Sovereignty as Dominium? Reconstructing the Constructivist Roman Law Thesis,” International Studies Quarterly 54: 449–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Max 1994. “After Thirty Years: Making Sense of the Assassination,” Reviews in American History 22: 191–209.Google Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi 1992. “Governance Without Government: Polyarchy in Nineteenth-Century European International Politics,” in Rosenau, James N. and Czempiel, Ernst-Otto, eds. Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoppe, Carsten 2008. “Passing the Buck: State Responsibility for Private Military Companies,” European Journal of International Law 19: 989–1014.Google Scholar
Hozic, Aida 2004. “Between the Cracks: Balkan Cigarette Smuggling,” Problems of Post-Communism 51: 35–44.Google Scholar
Hurka, Thomas 2005. “Proportionality in the Morality of War,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 33: 34–66.Google Scholar
Inayatullah, Naeem 1996. “Beyond the Sovereignty Dilemma: Quasi-States as Social Construct,” in Biersteker, Thomas and Weber, Cynthia, eds. State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus 2011. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. Routledge.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert 1993. Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Harold, Reisinger, William, and Mathers, Todd 1986. “National Entanglements in International Governmental Organizations,” American Political Science Review 80: 141–159.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kaczynski, Vlad and Fluharty, David 2002. “European Policies in West Africa: Who Benefits from Fisheries Agreements?” Marine Policy 26: 75–93.Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles and Lake, David, eds. 2003. Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kalmo, Hent and Skinner, Quentin, eds. 2010. Sovereignty in Fragments: The Past, Present, and Future of a Contested Concept. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kann, Robert 1950. The Multinational Empire: Nationalism and National Reform in the Habsburg Monarchy, 1848–1918. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret and Sikkink, Kathryn 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith 2008. “Assessing the Complex Evolution of Norms: The Rise of International Election Monitoring,” International Organization 62: 221–255.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert 1982. “The Demand for International Regimes,” International Organization 36: 325–355.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry 1958. A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh, and the Problems of Peace, 1812–1822. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Klein, Daniel and Robinson, John 2011. “Property: A Bundle of Rights? Prologue to the Property Symposium,” Econ Journal Watch 8: 193–204.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie 1995. Norms in International Relations: The Struggle Against Apartheid. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie and Lynch, Cecilia 2007. Strategies for Research in Constructivist International Relations. M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Kobrin, Stephen 1998. “Back to the Future: Neomedievalism and the Postmodern Digital World Economy,” Journal of International Affairs 51: 361–386.Google Scholar
Kocs, Stephen 1994. “Explaining the Strategic Behavior of States: International Law as System Structure,” International Studies Quarterly 38: 535–556.Google Scholar
Kolstad, Ivar and Søreide, Tina 2009. “Corruption in Natural Resource Management: Implications for Policy Makers,” Resources Policy 34: 214–226.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen 1993. “Westphalia and All That,” in Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O., eds. Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen 1995. “Sovereignty and Intervention,” in Lyons, Gene and Mastanduno, Michael, eds. Beyond Westphalia: State Sovereignty and International Intervention. The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich 1994. “The Limits of Contract,” European Journal of International Law 4: 465–491.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich 1995. “Sovereignty as Dominium: Is There a Right of Humanitarian Intervention?” in Lyons, Gene and Mastanduno, Michael, eds. Beyond Westphalia: State Sovereignty and International Intervention. The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Krebs, Ronald and Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus 2007. “Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric,” European Journal of International Relations 13: 35–66.Google Scholar
Lake, David 2003. “The New Sovereignty in International Relations,” International Studies Review 5: 303–323.Google Scholar
Leander, Anna 2005. “The Power to Construct International Security: On the Significance of Private Military Companies,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33: 803–825.Google Scholar
Leander, Anna 2011. “The Promises, Problems, and Potentials of a Bourdieu-Inspired Staging of International Relations,” International Political Sociology 5: 294–313.Google Scholar
Lee, Daniel 2008. “Private Law Models for Public Law Concepts: The Roman Law Theory of Dominium in the Monarchomach Doctrine of Popular Sovereignty,” The Review of Politics 70: 370–399.Google Scholar
Levi, Margaret, Sacks, Audrey, and Tyler, Tom 2009. “Conceptualizing Legitimacy, Measuring Legitimating Beliefs,” American Behavioral Scientist 53: 354–375.Google Scholar
Lumsdaine, David 1993. Moral Vision in International Politics: The Foreign Aid Regime, 1949–1989. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Luoma-Aho, Mika 2009. “Political Theology, Anthropomorphism, and Person-hood of the State: The Religion of IR,” International Political Sociology 3: 293–309.Google Scholar
Lyons, Martyn 1994. Napoleon Bonaparte and the Legacy of the French Revolution. St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Macpherson, Crawford Brough 1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mander, Jerry and Goldsmith, Edward, eds. 1996. The Case Against the Global Economy: And for a Turn Toward the Local. Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
March, James and Olsen, Johan 1998. “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders,” International Organization 52: 943–969.Google Scholar
Mathias, Peter 1983. The First Industrial Nation: An Economic History of Britain, 2nd ed. Methuen.Google Scholar
McCourt, David 2016. “Practice Theory and Relationalism as the New Constructivism,” International Studies Quarterly 60: 475–485.Google Scholar
McNamara, Kathleen 1997. “Globalization Is What We Make of It? The Social Construction of Market Imperatives,” paper presented at the 1997 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
McNamara, Kathleen 1998. The Currency of Ideas: Monetary Politics in the European Union. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, William 1982. The Pursuit of Power: Technology, Armed Force, and Society since A.D. 1000. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer 2006. “Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma,” European Journal of International Relations 12: 341–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Mick 2004. “Revenues, State Formation, and the Quality of Governance in Developing Countries,” International Political Science Review 25: 297–319.Google Scholar
Moran, Michael 2002. “Understanding the Regulatory State,” British Journal of Political Science 32: 391–413.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew 2004. “Is There a ‘Democratic Deficit’ in World Politics? A Framework for Analysis,” Government and Opposition 39: 336–363.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans 1940. “Positivism, Functionalism, and International Law,” American Journal of International Law 34: 260–284.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans 1948. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Knopf.Google Scholar
Morris, Justin 2013. “Libya and Syria: R2P and the Spectre of the Swinging Pendulum,” International Affairs 89: 1265–1283.Google Scholar
Mueller, Milton, Mathiason, John, and Klein, Hans 2007. “The Internet and Global Governance: Principles and Norms for a New Regime,” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 13: 237–254.Google Scholar
Mumford, Lewis 1961. The City in History: Its Origins, Its Transformations, and its Prospects. Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Munn, Mark 2006. The Mother of the Gods, Athens, and the Tyranny of Asia: A Study of Sovereignty in Ancient Religion. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Craig 2006. The United Nations Development Programme: A Better Way? Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Naim, Moises 2005. Illicit: How Smugglers, Traffickers, and Copycats Are Hijacking the Global Economy. Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Nayar, Baldev Raj 1995. “Regimes, Power, and International Aviation,” International Organization 49:139–170.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver 2007. “‘A Speech That the Entire Ministry May Stand for,’ or: Why Diplomats Never Produce Anything New,” International Political Sociology 1: 183–200.Google Scholar
Newman, Peter 1978. The Bronfman Dynasty: The Rothschilds of the New World. McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
Nexon, Daniel and Wright, Thomas 2007. “What’s at Stake in the American Empire Debate,” American Political Science Review 101: 253–271.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Richard 2013. “Rewarding Human Rights? Selective Aid Sanctions against Repressive States,” International Studies Quarterly 57: 791–803.Google Scholar
North, Douglass and Thomas, Robert Paul 1973. The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, Joseph Jr. 2001. “Globalization’s Democratic Deficit: How to Make International Institutions More Accountable,” Foreign Affairs 80: 2.Google Scholar
Ohmae, Kenichi 1995. The End of the Nation State, The Rise of Regional Economies: How New Engines of Prosperity Are Reshaping Global Markets. The Free Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood 1989. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas 1994. The States System of Europe, 1640–1990: Peacemaking and the Conditions of International Stability. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas 2001. “Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth,” International Organization 55: 251–287.Google Scholar
Paehlke, Robert 2002. Democracy’s Dilemma: Environment, Social Equity, and the Global Economy. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Palan, Ronen 2003. The Offshore World: Sovereign Markets, Virtual Places, and Nomad Millionaires. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Palan, Ronen, Murphy, Richard, and Chavagneux, Christian 2013. Tax Havens: How Globalization Really Works. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Paterson, Owen 2017. “Don’t Listen to the Terrified Europeans. The Singapore Model Is our Brexit Opportunity,” The Telegraph, November 21.Google Scholar
Patrick, Stewart 2018. The Sovereignty Wars: Reconciling America with the World. Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Peterson, M. J. 1988. Managing the Frozen South: The Creation and Evolution of the Antarctic Treaty System. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pflanze, Otto 1963. Bismarck and the Development of Germany: The Period of Unification, 1815–1871. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Richard 1998. “Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines,” International Organization 52: 613–644.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal 2000. “Compliance & Effectiveness in International Regulatory Cooperation,” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 32: 387–440.Google Scholar
Ravishankar, M. N., Pan, Shan, and Myers, Michael 2013. “Information Technology Offshoring in India: A Postcolonial Perspective,” European Journal of Information Systems 22: 387–402.Google Scholar
Rawlings, Gregory 2007. “Taxes and Transnational Treaties: Responsive Regulation and the Reassertion of Offshore Sovereignty,” Law & Policy 29: 51–66.Google Scholar
Reno, William 2000. “Clandestine Economies, Violence and States in Africa,” Journal of International Affairs 53: 433–459.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian 1999. The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas 2000. “Let’s Argue! Communicative Action in World Politics,” International Organization 54: 1–40Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques 1984. The Basic Political Writings. Translated by Cress, Donald. Hackett.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques 1986. Political Writings. Translated by Watkins, Frederick. The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard 1982. “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order,” International Organization 36: 379–415.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard 1983. “Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis,” World Politics 35: 261–285.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard 1992. “Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution,” International Organization 46: 561–598.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard 1993. “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations,” International Organization 47: 139–174.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard 1998. “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge,” International Organization 52: 855–885.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard, ed. 1993. Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Salter, Mark 2008. “When the Exception Becomes the Rule: Borders, Sovereignty, and Citizenship,” Citizenship Studies 12: 365–380.Google Scholar
Sand, Peter 2004. “Sovereignty Bounded: Public Trusteeship for Common Pool Resources?” Global Environmental Politics 4: 47–71.Google Scholar
Sasley, Brent 2011. “Theorizing States’ Emotions,” International Studies Review 13: 452–476.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl 2005. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Translated by Schwab, George. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Paul 1994. The Transformation of European Politics, 1763–1848. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Gary and Carr, Craig 1996. “Multilateral Treaties and the Formation of Customary International Law,” Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 25: 71.Google Scholar
Seligson, Mitchell 2002. “The Impact of Corruption on Regime Legitimacy: A Comparative Study of Four Latin American Countries,” The Journal of Politics 64: 408–433.Google Scholar
Selin, Henrik 2010. Global Governance of Hazardous Chemicals: Challenges of Multilevel Management. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sending, Ole Jacob, Pouliot, Vincent, and Neumann, Iver B. 2011. “The Future of Diplomacy: Changing Practices, Evolving Relationships,” International Journal 66: 527–542.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory 2012. “International Law and Global Public Goods in a Legal Pluralist World,” European Journal of International Law 23: 669–693.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn 1993. “Human Rights, Principled Issue-Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America,” International Organization 47: 411–441.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, Audra 2008. “Subjects of Sovereignty: Indigeneity, the Revenue Rule, and Juridics of Failed Consent,” Law & Contemporary Problems 71: 191.Google Scholar
Small, Melvin and Singer, J. David 1982. Resort to Arms: International and Civil Wars, 1816–1980. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Snidal, Duncan 1985. “The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory,” International Organization 39: 579–614.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik 1996. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors: An Analysis of Systems Change. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Srivastava, Swati 2019. “Varieties of Social Construction,” International Studies Review 22: 325–346. doi.org/10.1093/isr/viz003.Google Scholar
Srivastava, Swati forthcoming, Hybrid Sovereignty in World Politics (manuscript under review).Google Scholar
Steele, Brent 2008. Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State. Routledge.Google Scholar
Strang, David 1991. “Anomaly and Commonplace in European Political Expansion: Realist and Institutional Accounts,” International Organization 45: 143–162.Google Scholar
Strang, David 1996. “Contested Sovereignty: The Social Construction of Colonial Imperialism,” in Biersteker, Thomas and Weber, Cynthia, eds. State Sovereignty as a Social Construct. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strange, Susan 1996. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Straumann, Benjamin 2008. “The Peace of Westphalia (1648) as a Secular Constitution,” Constellations 15: 173–188.Google Scholar
Talmon, Stefan 1999. “Who Is a Legitimate Government in Exile? Towards Normative Criteria for Governmental Legitimacy in International Law,” in Goodwin-Gill, Guy and Talmon, Stefan, eds. The Reality of International Law: Essays in Honour of Ian Brownlie. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. J. P. 1954. The Struggle for Mastery in Europe, 1848–1918. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Telegraph 2016. “EU debate: Boris Johnson says Brexit will be ‘Britain’s Independence Day’ as Ruth Davidson Attacks ‘Lies’ of Leave Campaign in front of 6,000-strong Wembley Audience,” The Telegraph, June 21.Google Scholar
Temperley, Harold 1966. The Foreign Policy of Canning, 1822–1827: England, the Neo-Holy Alliance, and the New World. Archon Books.Google Scholar
Teschke, Benno 1998. “Geopolitical Relations in the European Middle Ages: History and Theory,” International Organization 52: 325–358.Google Scholar
Thomas, Daniel 2001. The Helsinki Effect: International Norms, Human Rights, and the Demise of Communism. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, Janice 1995. “State Sovereignty in International Relations: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Empirical Research,” International Studies Quarterly 39: 213–233.Google Scholar
Thomson, Janice 1996. Mercenaries, Pirates, and Sovereigns: State-Building and Extraterritorial Violence in Early Modern Europe. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles 1985. “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime,” in Evans, Peter, Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda, eds. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Treaty of Münster 1648. Peace Treaty Between the Holy Roman Emperor and the King of France and their Respective Allies. British Foreign Office Translation. Viewed at The Avalon Project, Yale Law School, https://avalon.law.yale.edu/17th_century/westphal.asp.Google Scholar
United Nations 1945. Charter of the United Nations. Viewed at www.un.org/en/charter-united-nations/.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. United Nations 217 (III).Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly 1995. Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 Relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks. United Nations A/CONF.164/37.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly 1998. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. United Nations A/CONF.183/9.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly 2005. 2005 World Summit Outcome. United Nations A/RES/60/1.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly 2012. Status of Palestine in the United Nations, United Nations A/67/L.28.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer de 2001 (1834). The Law of Nations or, the Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and to the Affairs of Nations and of Sovereigns, Chitty, Jospeh, ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vernon, Raymond 1971. Sovereignty at Bay: The Multinational Spread of U.S. Enterprises. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Vernon, Raymond 1981. “Sovereignty at Bay Ten Years After,” International Organization 35: 517–529.Google Scholar
Vincent, R. J. 1986. Human Rights and International Relations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vorhölter, Julia 2012. “Negotiating Social Change: Ugandan Discourses on Westernisation and Neo-Colonialism as Forms of Social Critique,” The Journal of Modern African Studies 50: 283–307.Google Scholar
Walker, R. B. J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Martin 2001. “Competing Political Visions: WTO Governance and Green Politics,” Global Environmental Politics 1: 92–113.Google Scholar
Sir Webster, Charles 1931. The Foreign Policy of Castlereagh, 1812–1815: Britain and the Reconstruction of Europe. G. Bell and Sons.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander 2004. “The State as Person in International Theory,” Review of International Studies 30: 289–316.Google Scholar
Wiessner, Siegfried 2008. “Indigenous Sovereignty: A Reassessment in Light of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People,” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 41: 1141.Google Scholar
Wilson, Charles 1967. “Trade, Society, and the State,” in Rich, Edwin and Wilson, Charles, eds. The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, Vol. IV: The Economy of Expanding Europe in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Charles 1968. The Dutch Republic and the Civilization of the Seventeenth Century. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar