Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:30:25.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Using Network Analysis to Explore the Role of Dispersal in Producing and Maintaining Island Species–Area Relationships

from Part IV - The Species–Area Relationship in Applied Ecology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2021

By
Joseph A. Veech  and
Giovanni Strona
Edited by
Thomas J. Matthews ,
Kostas A. Triantis  and
Robert J. Whittaker
Thomas J. Matthews
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Kostas A. Triantis
Affiliation:
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Robert J. Whittaker
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

By taking advantage of spatially explicit modelling and network analysis, we investigated how species–area relationships (SARs) emerge and are maintained by dispersal and how the spatial arrangement of islands affects colonization/extinction dynamics of SARs. In particular, we generated different archipelagos characterized by varying geometric properties and then we simulated inter-island dispersal/colonization patterns. As the model proceeds through time, species accumulate on different islands according to their dispersal ability and depending on island size and isolation. During each time step, the model fit a power function that thus enabled us to track the emergence of island SARs (ISARs). After equilibrium was reached, we simulated a phase of reduced dispersal. Each simulated archipelago was analysed as a network in which each island was a node connected to other nodes (islands) based on pairwise spatial distances. We found that basic properties of the underlying connectivity network were correlated with ISAR properties, although the best predictor of richness was almost always island area. In nearly all simulations, the ISAR weakened after reducing the dispersal ability of the species. Our study demonstrates that a spatially explicit dispersal simulation model and network analysis can provide meaningful insight into the evolution and robustness of ISARs.

Keywords

Islandsisland species–area relationshipinter-island connectivitydispersalinter-island dispersal/colonizationisland biogeographyspatially explicit dispersal simulation
Type
Chapter
Information
The Species–Area Relationship
Theory and Application
 , pp. 368 - 398
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerly, D. D. (2003) Community assembly, niche conservatism, and adaptive evolution in changing environments. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 164, S165–S184.Google Scholar
Adler, P. B., White, E. P., Laurenroth, W. K., Kaufman, D. M., Rassweiler, A. & Rusak, J. A. (2005) Evidence for a general species–time–area relationship. Ecology, 86, 2032–2039.Google Scholar
Allesina, S. & Pascual, M. (2006) Googling food webs: Can an eigenvector measure species’ importance for coextinctions? PLoS Computational Biology, 9, e1000494.Google Scholar
Altieri, A. H., van Wesenbeeck, B. K., Bertness, M. D. & Silliman, B. R. (2010) Facilitation cascade drives positive relationship between native biodiversity and invasion success. Ecology, 91, 1269–1275.Google Scholar
Arrhenius, O. (1921) Species and area. Journal of Ecology, 9, 95–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baranyi, G., Saura, S., Podani, J. & Jordán, F. (2011) Contribution of habitat patches to network connectivity: Redundancy and uniqueness of topological indices. Ecological Indicators, 11, 1301–1310.Google Scholar
Bodin, Ö. & Norberg, J. (2007) A network approach for analyzing spatially structured populations in fragmented landscape. Landscape Ecology, 22, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodin, Ö. & Saura, S. (2010) Ranking individual habitat patches as connectivity providers: Integrating network analysis and patch removal experiments. Ecological Modelling, 221, 2393–2405.Google Scholar
Brown, J. H. & Kodric-Brown, A. (1977) Turnover rates in insular biogeography: Effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology, 58, 445–449.Google Scholar
Cadotte, M. W. (2006) Dispersal and species diversity: A meta-analysis. The American Naturalist, 167, 913–924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Case, T. J. (1983) Niche overlap and the assembly of island lizard communities. Oikos, 41, 427–433.Google Scholar
Connor, E. F. & McCoy, E. D. (1979) The statistics and biology of the species–area relationship. The American Naturalist, 113, 791–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, H. V. & Lawton, J. H. (1992) Species interactions, local and regional processes, and limits to the richness of ecological communities: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Animal Ecology, 61, 1–12.Google Scholar
Crist, T. O. & Veech, J. A. (2006) Additive partitioning of rarefaction curves and species–area relationships: Unifying α-, β-, and γ-diversity with sample size and habitat area. Ecology Letters, 9, 923–932.Google Scholar
de Arruda, G. F., Barbieri, A. L., Rodríguez, P. M., Rodrigues, F. A., Moreno, Y. & Costa, L. F. (2014) Role of centrality for the identification of influential spreaders in complex networks. Physical Review E, 90, 032812.Google Scholar
Drakare, S., Lennon, J. J. & Hillebrand, H. (2006) The imprint of the geographical, evolutionary, and ecological context on species–area relationships. Ecology Letters, 9, 215–227.Google Scholar
Economo, E. P. & Keitt, T. H. (2008) Species diversity in neutral metacommunities: A network approach. Ecology Letters, 11, 52–62.Google Scholar
Economo, E. P. & Keitt, T. H. (2010) Network isolation and local diversity in neutral metacommunities. Oikos, 119, 1355–1363.Google Scholar
Fattorini, S. (2009) On the general dynamic model of oceanic island biogeography. Journal of Biogeography, 36, 1100–1110.Google Scholar
Fattorini, S., Borges, P. A. V., Dapporto, L. & Strona, G. (2017) What can the parameters of the species–area relationship (SAR) tell us? Insights from Mediterranean islands. Journal of Biogeography, 44, 1018–1028.Google Scholar
Gómez-Rodríguez, C., Miller, K. E., Castillejo, J., Iglesias-Piñeiro, J. & Baselga, A. (2019) Understanding dispersal limitation through the assessment of diversity patterns across phylogenetic scales below the species level. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 28, 353–364.Google Scholar
He, F., Gaston, K. J., Connor, E. F. & Srivastava, D. S. (2005) The local–regional relationship: Immigration, extinction, and scale. Ecology, 86, 360–365.Google Scholar
Hormiga, G., Arnedo, M. & Gillespie, R. G. (2003) Speciation on a conveyor belt: Sequential colonization of the Hawaiian Islands by Orsonwelles spiders (Araneae, Linyphiidae). Systematic Biology, 52, 70–88.Google Scholar
Hubbell, S. P. (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Janzen, D. H. (1985) On ecological fitting. Oikos, 45, 308–310.Google Scholar
Kitsak, M., Gallos, L. K., Havlin, S., Liljeros, F., Muchnik, L., Stanley, H. E. & Makse, H. A. (2010) Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks. Nature Physics, 6, 888–893.Google Scholar
Kneitel, J. M. & Miller, T. E. (2003) Dispersal rates affect species composition in metacommunities of Sarraenia purpurea inquilines. The American Naturalist, 162, 165–171.Google Scholar
Kokko, H. & López-Sepulcre, A. (2006) From individual dispersal to species ranges: Perspectives for a changing world. Science, 313, 789–791.Google Scholar
Leibold, M. A., Holyoak, M., Mouquet, N., Amarasekare, P., Chase, J. M., Hoopes, M. F., Holt, R. D., Shurin, J. B., Law, R., Tilman, D., Loreau, M. & Gonzalez, A. (2004) The metacommunity concept: A framework for multi‐scale community ecology. Ecology Letters, 7, 601–613.Google Scholar
Lomolino, M. V. (2000) Ecology’s most general, yet protean pattern: The species–area relationship. Journal of Biogeography, 27, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomolino, M. V., Riddle, B. R. & Brown, J. H. (2006) Biogeography, 3rd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Losos, J. B. & Ricklefs, R. E. (2010) The theory of island biogeography revisited. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O. (1963) An equilibrium theory of insular zoogeography. Evolution, 17, 373–387.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O. (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
MacDougall, A. S., Gilbert, B. & Levine, J. M. (2009) Plant invasions and the niche. Journal of Ecology, 97, 609–615.Google Scholar
Matthews, T. J., Rigal, F., Triantis, K. A. & Whittaker, R. J. (2019) A global model of island species–area relationships. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 116, 12337–12342.Google Scholar
McGill, B. J. (2010) Towards a unification of unified theories of biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 13, 627–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medeiros, M. J. & Gillespie, R. G. (2011) Biogeography and the evolution of flightlessness in a radiation of Hawaiian moths (Xyloryctidae: Thyrocopa). Journal of Biogeography, 38, 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, H. A. & Cleland, E. E. (2001) The evolutionary impact of invasive species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 98, 5446–5451.Google Scholar
Mouquet, N. & Loreau, M. (2003) Community patterns in source-sink metacommunities. The American Naturalist, 162, 544–557.Google Scholar
Newman, M. E., Barabási, A. L. E. & Watts, D. J. (2006) The structure and dynamics of networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O’Dwyer, J. P. & Green, J. L. (2010) Field theory for biogeography: A spatially explicit model for predicting patterns of biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 13, 87–95.Google Scholar
Patiño, J., Weigelt, P., Guilhaumon, F., Kreft, H., Triantis, K. A., Naranjo-Cigala, A., Sólymos, P. & Vanderpoorten, A. (2014) Differences in species–area relationships among the major lineages of land plants: A macroecological perspective. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 23, 1275–1283.Google Scholar
Proulx, S. R., Promislow, D. E. L. & Phillips, P. C. (2005) Network thinking in ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20, 345–353.Google Scholar
Radicchi, F. & Castellano, C. (2017) Fundamental difference between superblockers and superspreaders in networks. Physical Review E, 95, 012318.Google Scholar
Ricciardi, A., Hoopes, M. F., Marchetti, M. P. & Lockwood, J. A. (2013) Progress toward understanding the ecological impacts of nonnative species. Ecology, 83, 263–282.Google Scholar
Ricklefs, R. E. (1987) Community diversity: Relative roles of local and regional processes. Science, 235, 167–171.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, M. L. (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Santamaria, C. A., Mateos, M., Taiti, S., DeWitt, T. J. & Hurtado, L. A. (2013) A complex evolutionary history in a remote archipelago: Phylogeography and morphometrics of the Hawaiian endemic Ligia isopods. PLoS One, 12, e85199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoener, T. W. (2010) The MacArthur-Wilson equilibrium model: A chronicle of what it said and how it was tested. The theory of island biogeography revisited (ed. by Losos, J. B. and Ricklefs, R. E.), pp. 52–87. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Seymour, M., Fronhofer, E. A. & Altermatt, F. (2015) Dendritic network structure and dispersal affect temporal dynamics of diversity and species persistence. Oikos, 124, 908–916.Google Scholar
Shaw, K. L. (1996) Sequential radiations and patterns of speciation in the Hawaiian cricket genus Laupala inferred from DNA sequences. Evolution, 50, 237–255.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D., Martin, J. L., Genovesi, P., Maris, V., Wardle, D. A., Aronson, J., Courchamp, F., Galil, B., García-Berthou, E., Pascal, M., Pyšek, P., Sousa, R., Tabacchi, E. & Vilà, M. (2013) Impacts of biological invasions: What’s what and the way forward. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28, 58–66.Google Scholar
Skóra, F., Abilhoa, V., Padial, A. A. & Vitule, J. R. S. (2015) Darwin’s hypotheses to explain colonization trends: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment and a new conceptual model. Diversity and Distributions, 21, 583–594.Google Scholar
Sólymos, P. & Lele, S. R. (2012) Global pattern and local variation in species–area relationships. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 21, 109–120.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. D., Bodsworth, E. J., Wilson, R. J., Simmons, A. D., Davies, Z. G., Musche, M. & Conradt, L. (2001) Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins. Nature, 411, 577–581.Google Scholar
Triantis, K. A., Guilhaumon, F. & Whittaker, R. J. (2012) The island species–area relationship: Biology and statistics. Journal of Biogeography, 39, 215–231.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. L. & Funk, V. A. (1995) Hawaiian biogeography: Evolution on a hot spot archipelago. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
White, E. P. (2004) Two-phase species–time relationships in North American land birds. Ecology Letters, 7, 329–336.Google Scholar
Whittaker, R. J. & Fernández-Palacios, J. M. (2007) Island biogeography: Ecology, evolution, and conservation, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whittaker, R. J., Triantis, K. A. & Ladle, R. J. (2008) A general dynamic theory of oceanic island biogeography. Journal of Biogeography, 35, 977–994.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×