Book contents
- States and Their Nationals Abroad
- States and Their Nationals Abroad
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 States’ Interactions with Their National Communities Abroad
- 2 India
- 3 Mexico
- 4 Russia
- 5 China
- 6 Pakistan
- 7 Philippines
- 8 The United Kingdom
- 9 Indonesia
- 10 Germany
- 11 Egypt
- 12 Türkiye
- 13 The United States
- 14 Comparative Insights into States’ Support, Co-optation, and Repression of Their National Communities Abroad
- Index
- References
8 - The United Kingdom
Good Information, Limited Liability, and a Powerful Safety Net
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 December 2024
- States and Their Nationals Abroad
- States and Their Nationals Abroad
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 States’ Interactions with Their National Communities Abroad
- 2 India
- 3 Mexico
- 4 Russia
- 5 China
- 6 Pakistan
- 7 Philippines
- 8 The United Kingdom
- 9 Indonesia
- 10 Germany
- 11 Egypt
- 12 Türkiye
- 13 The United States
- 14 Comparative Insights into States’ Support, Co-optation, and Repression of Their National Communities Abroad
- Index
- References
Summary
The single biggest driver of the UK’s engagement with its nationals abroad is immediate domestic politics. Thanks to its imperial past, the UK has a relatively large number of nationals abroad. Most are comparatively wealthy and reside in developed, stable states where they often speak the language, such as Australia or the United States. Because of their numbers and independent means, the UK government largely tries to limit its liability for them. Instead, it focuses on providing good information and advice to travelers and expatriates alike, while making clear that it expects them to take care of themselves. In extraordinary circumstances, however, particularly when events abroad attract domestic media, public, or parliamentary attention, it is both able and willing to act much more robustly. Typically this involves measures to support nationals in difficulty by evacuating them from conflict zones or the sites of natural disasters. Its relative wealth and status as a liberal democracy means it rarely tries to co-opt or suppress its nationals abroad. It does make exceptions to this rule, however, for individuals whose status as nationals is in dispute.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- States and their Nationals AbroadSupport, Co-Opt, Repress, pp. 183 - 203Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024