Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T07:40:45.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 20 - Carotid and Vertebral Artery Revascularization

from Part V - Prevention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2020

By
Mandy D. Müller ,
Leo H. Bonati  and
Martin M. Brown
Edited by
Jeffrey L. Saver  and
Graeme J. Hankey
Jeffrey L. Saver
Affiliation:
David Geffen School of Medicine, University of Ca
Graeme J. Hankey
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
Get access

Summary

With the exception of near-occlusion, CEA is of overall benefit for selected patients with recent symptomatic carotid stenosis =50% (NASCET method), provided surgical stroke/death risk is low. The benefit is greater with greater stenosis, men, the elderly (aged =75y), most recent ischaemic event within 2w, irregular plaque surface, and impaired cerebral perfusion reserve. Patients with recent symptomatic carotid territory ischaemic events should be screened by Doppler ultrasonography, MRA, or CTA, confirming substantial stenosis with a second non-invasive investigation. Catheter angiography may be required to confirm uncertain results. The surgical peri-operative stroke and death rate (7% in RCTs) is higher in women, hypertension, peripheral arterial disease, and occlusion of the contralateral ICA or ipsilateral ECA. The experience of the surgeon and hospital are crucial, and audited peri-operative complication rates should be publically available. Carotid stenting is less invasive than CEA and causes fewer local complications (cranial neuropathy and neck haematoma), but carries a higher procedural risk of stroke. Stenting should be considered in younger patients, or those at increased risk from CEA. While stenting is of high risk for intracranial vertebral artery stenosis, risk is low for extracranial stenosis and should be considered for recurrent symptoms despite optimal medical therapy.

Keywords

Carotid stenosiscarotid endarterectomycarotid angioplastystentingvertebral stenosisischaemic stroketransient ischaemic attackdiagnosispreventiontreatmentperi-operative complications
Type
Chapter
Information
Stroke Prevention and Treatment
An Evidence-based Approach
 , pp. 412 - 449
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberts, MJ. (2001). Results of a multicentre prospective randomized trial of carotid artery stenting vs. carotid endarterectomy. Stroke, 32, 325.Google Scholar
Barbato, JE, Dillavou, E, Horowitz, MB, Jovin, TG, Kanal, E. (2008). A randomized trial of carotid artery stenting with and without cerebral protection. J Vasc Surg, 47, 760–5. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2007.11.058.Google Scholar
Bijuklic, K, Wandler, A, Hazizi, F, Schofer, J. (2012). The PROFI study (prevention of cerebral embolization by proximal balloon occlusion compared to filter protection during carotid artery stenting): a prospective randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol, 59, 1383–9.Google Scholar
Bonati, LH, Dobson, J, Featherstone, RL, Ederle, J, van der Worp, HB, de Borst, GJ, et al.; International Carotid Stenting Study Investigators. (2015). Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial. Lancet 385: 529–538Google Scholar
Bonati, LH, Jongen, LM, Haller, S, Flach, HZ, Dobson, J, Nederkoorn, PJ, et al. (2010). New ischaemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS). Lancet Neurol, 9, 353–62.Google Scholar
Bonati, LH, Lyrer, P, Ederle, J, Featherstone, R, Brown, MM. (2012). Percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 9. CD000515. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub4.Google Scholar
Bond, R, Rerkasem, K, Rothwell, PM. (2003). A systematic review of the risks of carotid endarterectomy in relation to the clinical indication and the timing of surgery. Stroke, 34, 2290–2301.Google Scholar
Brooks, WH, Jones, MR, Gisler, P, McClure, RR, Coleman, TC, Breathitt, L, et al. (2014). Carotid angioplasty with stenting versus endarterectomy: 10-year randomized trial in a community hospital. JACC, 7. 163–8.Google Scholar
Brott, TG, Hobson, RW, Howard, G, Roubin, GS, Clark, WM, Brooks, W, et al. (2010). Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med, 363, 11–23.Google Scholar
Brott, TG, Howard, G, Roubin, GS, Meschia, JF, Mackey, A, Brooks, W, et al. (2016). Long-term results of stenting versus endarterectomy for carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med, 374, 1021–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulbulia, R, Halliday, A. (2013). ACST-2 – an update. A large, simple randomised trial to compare carotid endarterectomy versus carotid artery stenting to prevent stroke in asymptomatic patients. Gefasschirurgie, 18, 626–32.Google Scholar
Cao, PG, De Rango, P, Zannetti, S, Giordano, G, Ricci, S, Celani, MG . (2001). Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy for preventing stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 1. CD001921.Google Scholar
CAVATAS Investigators. (2001). Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial. Lancet, 357, 1729–37.Google Scholar
Cheng, SF, Brown, MM. (2017). Contemporary medical therapies of atherosclerotic carotid artery disease. Semin Vasc Surg, 30, 8–16Google Scholar
Cheng, SF, Brown, MM, Simister, RJ, Richards, T. (2019). Contemporary prevalence of carotid stenosis in patients presenting with ischaemic stroke. Br J Surg, 106, 872–8.Google Scholar
Chimowitz, MI, Lynn, MJ, Derdeyn, CP, Turan, TN, Fiorella, D, Lane, BF, et al. (2011). Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med, 365, 993–1003.Google Scholar
Chongruksut, W, Vaniyapong, T, Rerkasem, K. (2014). Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting). Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 6. CD000190. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000190.pub3.Google Scholar
Compter, A, van der Worp, HB, Schonewille, WJ, Schonewille, WJ, Vos, JA, Boiten, J, et al; VAST Investigators. (2015). Stenting versus medical treatment in patients with symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis: a randomised open-label phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol, 14, 606–14.Google Scholar
Coull, AJ, Lovett, JK, Rothwell, PM, on behalf of the Oxford Vascular Study. (2004). Population based study of early risk of stroke after transient ischemic attack or minor stroke: implications for public education and organisation of services. BMJ, 328, 326–8.Google Scholar
Coward, LJ, McCabe, DJ, Ederle, J, Featherstone, RL, Clifton, A, Brown, MM; CAVATAS Investigators. (2007). Long-term outcome after angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis compared with medical treatment in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomized trial. Stroke, 38, 1526–30.Google Scholar
Dotter, CT, Judkins, MP, Rosch, J. (1967). Nonoperative treatment of arterial occlusive disease: a radiologically facilitated technique. Radiol Clin North Am, 5, 531–42.Google Scholar
Eberhardt, O, Naegele, T, Raygrotzki, S, Weller, M, Ernemann, U. (2006). Stenting of vertebrobasilar arteries in symptomatic atherosclerotic disease and acute occlusion: case series and review of the literature. J Vasc Surg, 43, 1145–54.Google Scholar
Eckstein, H-H, Ringleb, P, Allenberg, J-R, Berger, J, Fraedrich, G, Hacke, W, et al. (2008). Results of the Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol, 7, 893–902Google Scholar
Eckstein, H-H, Reiff, T, Ringleb, P, Jansen, O, Mansmann, U, Hacke, W. (2016). SPACE-2: a missed opportunity to compare carotid endarterectomy, carotid stenting, and best medical treatment in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 51, 761–5. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.02.005.Google Scholar
Ederle, J, Davagnanam, I, van der Worp, HB, Venables, GS, Lyrer, PA, Featherstone, RL, et al. (2013). Effect of white-matter lesions on the risk of periprocedural stroke after carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy in the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS): a prespecified analysis of data from a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol, 12, 866–72.Google Scholar
Ederle, J, Featherstone, RL, Brown, MM. (2009a). Long-term outcome of endovascular treatment versus medical care for carotid artery stenosis in patients not suitable for surgery and randomised in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty study (CAVATAS). Cerebrovasc Dis, 28, 1–7. doi:10.1159/000215936.Google Scholar
Ederle, J, Bonati, LH, Dobson, J, Featherstone, RL, Gaines, PA, Beard, JD. (2009b). Endovascular treatment with angioplasty or stenting versus endarterectomy in patients with carotid artery stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): long-term follow-up of a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol, 8, 898–907. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70228-5.Google Scholar
Engelter, S, Lyrer, P (2003). Antiplatelet therapy for preventing stroke and other vascular events after carotid endarterectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2. CD001458. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engelter, S, Lyrer, P. (2004). Antiplatelet therapy for preventing stroke and other vascular events after carotid endarterectomy (Cochrane Corner). Stroke, 35, 1227–8Google Scholar
European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. (1991). MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial. Interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet, 337, 1235–43.Google Scholar
European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. (1998). Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet, 351, 1379–87.Google Scholar
Feasby, TE, Quan, H, Ghali, WA. (2002). Hospital and surgeon determinants of carotid endarterectomy outcomes. Archiv Neurol, 59, 1877–81.Google Scholar
Fields, WS, Maslenikov, V, Meyer, JS, Hass, WK, Remington, RD, MacDonald, M. (1970). Joint study of extracranial arterial occlusion. V. Progress report on prognosis following surgery or non- surgical treatment for transient cerebral ischaemic attacks and cervical carotid artery lesions. JAMA, 211, 1993–2003.Google Scholar
GALA Trial Collaborative Group, Lewis, SC, Warlow, CP, Bodenham, AR, Colam, B, Rothwell, PM, Torgerson, D, et al. (2008). General anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 372, 2132–42.Google Scholar
Goldstein, LB, Moore, WS, Robertson, JT, Chaturvedi, S. (1997). Complication rates for carotid endarterectomy: a call for action. Stroke, 28, 889–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorelick, PB. (1993). Distribution of atherosclerotic cerebrovascular lesions. Effects of age, race, and sex. Stroke, 24, 116–19Google ScholarPubMed
Gray, WA, Hopkins, LN, Yadav, S, Davis, T, Wholey, M, Atkinson, R. (2006). Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results. J Vasc Surg, 44, 258–68. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2006.03.044.Google Scholar
Gray, WA, Yadav, JS, Verta, P, Scicli, A, Fairman, R, Wholey, M. (2007). The CAPTURE registry: predictors of outcomes in carotid artery stenting with embolic protection for high surgical risk patients in the early post-approval setting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 70, 1025–33. doi:10.1002/ccd.21359.Google Scholar
Grubb, Jr RL, Derdeyn, CP, Fritsch, SM, Carpenter, DA, Yundt, KD, Videen, TO, et al. (1998). Importance of hemodynamic factors in the prognosis of symptomatic carotid occlusion. JAMA, 280, 1055–60.Google Scholar
Guimaraens, L, Sola, MT, Matali, A, Arbelaez, A, Delgado, M, Soler, L. (2002). Carotid angioplasty with cerebral protection and stenting: report of 164 patients (194 carotid percutaneous transluminal angioplasties). Cerebrovasc Dis, 13, 114–19.Google Scholar
Gulli, G, Marquardt, L, Rothwell, PM, Markus, HS. (2013). Stroke risk after posterior circulation stroke/transient ischemic attack and its relationship to site of vertebrobasilar stenosis: pooled data analysis from prospective studies. Stroke, 44, 598–604.Google Scholar
Gurm, HS, Yadav, JS, Fayad, P, Katzen, BT, Mishkel, GJ, Bajwa, TK. (2008). Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med, 358, 1572–9. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0708028.Google Scholar
Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. (2004). Effects of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin on stroke and other major vascular events in 20,536 people with cerebrovascular disease or other high-risk conditions. Lancet, 363, 757–67.Google Scholar
Higgins, JP, Altman, DG, Gotzsche, PC, Juni, P, Moher, D, Oxman, AD. (2011). The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 343, d5928. doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, A, Taschner, C, Mendelowitsch, A, Merlo, A, Radue, EW. (2008). Carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy – a prospective randomised controlled single-centre trial with long-term follow-up (BACASS). Schweizer Archiv fur Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 159, 84–9.Google Scholar
Howard, G, Roubin, GS, Jansen, O, Hendrikse, J, Halliday, A, Fraedrich, G, et al. (2016). Association between age and risk of stroke or death from carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting: a meta-analysis of pooled patient data from four randomised trials. Lancet, 387, 1305–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Carotid Stenting Study Investigators. (2010). Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 375, 985–97.Google Scholar
Kuliha, M, Roubec, M, Prochazka, V. (2015). Randomized clinical trial comparing neurological outcomes after carotid endaterectomy or stenting. J Vasc Surg, 62, 519.Google Scholar
Liem, MI, Kennedy, F, Bonati, LH, van der Lugt, A, Coolen, BF, Nederveen, A, et al. (2017). Investigations of carotid stenosis to identify vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque and determine individual stroke risk. Circ J, 81, 1246–53.Google Scholar
Lin, PH, Bush, RL, Lubbe, DF, Cox, MM, Zhou, W, McCoy, SA. (2004). Carotid artery stenting with routine cerebral protection in high-risk patients. Am J Surg, 188, 644–52. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.035.Google Scholar
Ling, F. (2006). Preliminary report of trial of endarterectomy versus stenting for the treatment of carotid atherosclerotic stenosis in China (TESCAS-C). Chinese J Cerebrovasc Dis, 3, 4–8.Google Scholar
Liu, CW, Liu, B, Ye, W, Wu, WW, Li, YJ, Zheng, YH. (2009). Carotid endarterectomy versus carotid stenting: a prospective randomized trial. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi, 47, 267–70.Google Scholar
Lovett, JK, Coull, A, Rothwell, PM, on behalf of the Oxford Vascular Study. (2004). Early risk of recurrent stroke by aetiological subtype: implications for stroke prevention. Neurology, 62, 569–74.Google Scholar
Lovett, J, Dennis, M, Sandercock, PAG, Bamford, J, Warlow, CP, Rothwell, PM. (2003). The very early risk of stroke following a TIA. Stroke, 34, e138–e140.Google Scholar
MacDonald, S, Evans, DH, Griffiths, PD, McKevitt, FM, Venables, GS, Cleveland, TJ, et al. (2010). Filter-protected versus unprotected carotid artery stenting: a randomised trial. Cerebrovasc Dis, 29, 282–9.Google Scholar
Markus, HS, Droste, DW, Kaps, M, Larrue, V, Lees, K, Siebler, M, Ringelstein, EB (2005). Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin in symptomatic carotid stenosis evaluated using doppler embolic signal detection. The Clopidogrel and Aspirin for Reduction of Emboli in Symptomatic carotid Stenosis (CARESS) trial. Circulation, 111, 2233–40.Google Scholar
Markus, HS, Larsson, SC, Kuker, W, Schulz, UG, Ford, I, Rothwell, PM, Clifton, A; VIST Investigators. (2017). Stenting for symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis: The Vertebral Artery Ischaemia Stenting Trial. Neurology, 89, 1229–36.Google Scholar
Markus, HS, van der Worp, HB, Rothwell, PM. (2013). Posterior circulation ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack: diagnosis, investigation, and secondary prevention. Lancet Neurol, 12, 989–98.Google Scholar
Mas, J-L, Chatellier, G, Beyssen, B, Branchereau, A, Moulin, T, Becquemin, JP, et al. (2006). Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med, 355, 1660–71.Google Scholar
Mas, JL, Arquizan, C, Calvet, D, Viguier, A, Albucher, JF, Piquet, P (2014). Long-term follow-up study of endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis trial. Stroke, 45, 2750–6. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsen, SL, Chang, DC, Perler, BA, Roseborough, GS, Williams, GM. (2006). Trends in the in-hospital stroke rate following carotid endarterectomy in California and Maryland. J Vasc Surg, 44, 488–95.Google Scholar
Mayberg, MR, Wilson, E, Yatsu, F, Weiss, DG, Messina, L, Hershey, LA, et al. (1991). Carotid endarterectomy and prevention of cerebral ischemia in symptomatic carotid stenosis. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 309 Trialist Group. JAMA, 266, 3289–94.Google Scholar
Mercuri, M, Bond, MG, Sirtori, CR, Veglia, F, Crepaldi, G, Feruglio, FS, et al. (1996). Pravastatin reduces carotid intima-media thickness progression in an asymptomatic hypercholesterolemic Mediterranean population: the Carotid Atherosclerosis Italian Ultrasound Study. Am J Med, 101, 627–34.Google Scholar
Molloy, J, Markus, HS. (1999). Asymptomatic embolization predicts stroke and TIA risk in patients with carotid artery stenosis. Stroke, 30, 1440–3.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, LB, Fox, AJ, Sharpe, BL, Eliasziw, M, Barnett, HJ, Grotta, JC, for the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group. (1997). The risks and benefits of carotid endarterectomy in patients with near occlusion of the carotid artery. Neurology, 48, 911–15.Google Scholar
Naylor, AR, Bolia, A, Abbott, RJ, Pye, IF, Smith, J, Lennard, N. (1998). Randomized study of carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: a stopped trial. J Vasc Surg, 28, 326–334.Google Scholar
North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. (1991a). Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med, 325, 445–53.Google Scholar
North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. (1991b). North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Methods, patient characteristics, and progress. Stroke, 22, 711–20.Google Scholar
North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators (1998). Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. N Engl J Med, 339, 1415–25.Google Scholar
Ogata, J, Masuda, J, Yutani, C, Yamaguchi, T. (1990). Rupture of atheromatous plaque as a cause of thrombotic occlusion of stenotic internal carotid artery. Stroke, 21, 1740–45.Google Scholar
Orrapin, S, Rerkasem, K. (2017). Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 6. CD001081. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001081.pub3.Google Scholar
Paraskevas, KI, Robertson, V, Saratzis, AN, Naylor, AR. (2018). An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes following eversion vs. conventional carotid endarterectomy in randomised controlled trials and observational studies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 55, 465–73. doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.12.025Google Scholar
Payne, DA, Jones, CI, Hayes, PD, Thompson, MM, London, NJ, Bell, PR, et al. (2004). Beneficial effects of clopidogrel combined with aspirin in reducing cerebral emboli in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Circulation, 109, 1476–81.Google Scholar
PROGRESS Collaborative Group. (2001). Randomised trial of a perindopril-based blood-pressure- lowering regimen among 6,105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Lancet, 358, 1033–41.Google Scholar
Reimers, B, Corvaja, N, Moshiri, S, Sacca, S, Albiero, R, Di Mario, C. (2001). Cerebral protection with filter devices during carotid artery stenting. Circulation, 104, 12–15.Google Scholar
Reimers, B, Schluter, M, Castriota, F, Tubler, T, Corvaja, N, Cernetti, C. (2004). Routine use of cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting: results of a multicenter registry of 753 patients. Am J Med, 116, 217–22. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.09.043Google Scholar
Rerkasem, K, Rothwell, PM. (2009). Patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 4. CD000160. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000160.pub3.Google Scholar
Rerkasem, K, Rothwell., PM (2010). Patches of different types for carotid patch angioplasty. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 3. CD000071. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000071.pub3.Google Scholar
Ringleb, PA, Allenberg, J, Bruckmann, H, Eckstein, HH, Fraedrich, G, Hartmann, M. (2006). 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet, 368, 1239–47. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69122-8.Google Scholar
Rosenfield, K, Matsumura, JS, Chaturvedi, S, Riles, T, Ansel, GM, Metzger, DC. (2016). Randomized trial of stent versus surgery for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med, 374, 1011–20.Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM. (2005). With what to treat which patient with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis? Pract Neurol, 5, 68–83.Google Scholar
Rothwell, P, Slattery, J, Warlow, C. (1997). Clinical and angiographic predictors of stroke and death from carotid endarterectomy: systematic review. BMJ, 315, 1571–7.Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Eliasziw, M, Gutnikov, SA, Fox, AJ, Taylor, W, Mayberg, MR, et al., for the Carotid Endarterectomy Trialists’ Collaboration. (2003b). Pooled analysis of individual patient data from randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet, 361, 107–16.Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Eliasziw, M, Gutnikov, SA, Warlow, CP, Barnett, HJ, for the Carotid Endarterectomy Trialists’ Collaboration. (2004). Endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in relation to clinical subgroups and the timing of surgery. Lancet, 363, 915–24.Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Gibson, R, Warlow, CP. (2000). Interrelation between plaque surface morphology and degree of stenosis on carotid angiograms and the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke, 31, 615–21.Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Gibson, RJ, Slattery, JM, Sellar, RJ, Warlow, CP. (1994). Equivalence of measurements of carotid stenosis: a comparison of three methods of 1001 angiograms. Stroke, 25, 2435–9.Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Gutnikov, SA, Warlow, CP, for the ECST. (2003a). Re-analysis of the final results of the European Carotid Surgery Trial. Stroke, 34, 514–23.Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Howard, SC, Spence, D. (2003c). Relationship between blood pressure and stroke risk in patients with symptomatic carotid occlusive disease. Stroke, 34, 2583–90.Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Mehta, Z, Howard, SC, Gutnikov, SA, Warlow, CP. (2005). From subgroups to individuals: general principles and the example of carotid endartectomy. Lancet, 365, 256–65.Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Slattery, J, Warlow, CP. (1996a). A systematic comparison of the risk of stroke and death due to carotid endarterectomy. Stroke, 27, 260–5.Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Slattery, J, Warlow, CP. (1996b). A systematic comparison of the risk of stroke and death due to carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke, 27, 266–9.Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Warlow, CP, for the European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. (2000). Low risk of ischaemic stroke in patients with collapse of the internal carotid artery distal to severe carotid stenosis: cerebral protection due to low post-stenotic flow? Stroke, 31, 622–30.Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Warlow, CP, on behalf of the ECST Collaborators. (1999). Prediction of benefit from carotid endarterectomy in individual patients: a risk-modelling study. Lancet, 353, 2105–10.Google Scholar
Safian, RD, Jaff, MR, Bresnahan, JF, Foster, M, Bacharach, JM, Yadav, J. (2010). Protected carotid stenting in high-risk patients: results of the SpideRX arm of the carotid revascularization with ev3 arterial technology evolution trial. J Interv Cardiol, 23, 491–8.Google Scholar
Sandercock, PA, Warlow, CP, Jones, LN, Starkey, IR. (1989). Predisposing factors for cerebral infarction: the Oxfordshire community stroke project. BMJ, 298, 75–80.Google Scholar
Schnaudigel, S, Groschel, K, Pilgram, SM, Kastrup, A. (2008). New brain lesions after carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review of the literature. Stroke, 39, 1911–19. doi:10.1161/strokeaha.107.500603.Google Scholar
Shaw, DA, Venables, GS, Cartilidge, NE, Bates, D, Dickinson, PH. (1984). Carotid endarterectomy in patients with transient cerebral ischaemia. J Neurol Sci, 64, 45–53.Google Scholar
Sillesen, H, Amarenco, P, Hennerici, MG, Callahan, A, Goldstein, LB, Zivin, J, et al. (2008). Atorvastatin reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with carotid atherosclerosis: a secondary analysis of the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trial. Stroke, 39, 3297–3302.Google Scholar
Spence, JD. (2000). Management of resistant hypertension in patients with carotid stenosis: high prevalence of renovascular hypertension. Cerebrovasc Dis, 10, 249–54.Google Scholar
Stabile, E, Sannino, A, Schiattarella, GG, Gargiulo, G, Toscano, E, Brevetti, L. (2014). Cerebral embolic lesions detected with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging following carotid artery stenting: a meta-analysis of 8 studies comparing filter cerebral protection and proximal balloon occlusion. JACC, 7, 1177–83.Google Scholar
Stayman, AN, Nogueira, RG, Gupta, R. (2011). A systematic review of stenting and angioplasty of symptomatic extracranial vertebral artery stenosis. Stroke, 42, 2212–16.Google Scholar
Steinbauer, MG, Pfister, K, Greindl, M, Schlachetzki, F, Borisch, I, Schuirer, G. (2008). Alert for increased long-term follow-up after carotid artery stenting: results of a prospective, randomized, single-center trial of carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg, 48, 93–8. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2008.02.049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Streifler, JY, Eliasziw, M, Benavente, OR, Alamowitch, S, Fox, AJ, Hachinski, V, et al. (2002). Prognostic importance of leukoaraiosis in patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis. Stroke, 33, 1651–5.Google Scholar
Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) Investigators. (2006). High-dose atorvastatin after stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med, 355, 549–59.Google Scholar
Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischaemia Trial (SPIRIT) Study Group. (1997). A randomised trial of anticoagulants versus aspirin after cerebral ischaemia of presumed arterial origin. Annals of Neurology, 42, 857–65.Google Scholar
Strömberg, S, Gelin, J, Osterberg, T, Bergström, GM, Karlström, L, Osterberg, K; Swedish Vascular Registry (Swedvasc) Steering Committee. (2012). Very urgent carotid endarterectomy confers increased procedural risk. Stroke, 43, 1331–5.Google Scholar
Theron, JG, Payelle, GG, Coskun, O, Huet, HF, Guimaraens, L. (1996). Carotid artery stenosis: treatment with protected balloon angioplasty and stent placement. Radiology, 201, 627–36. doi:10.1148/radiology.201.3.8939208Google Scholar
Thiele, BL, Young, JV, Chikos, PM, Hirsch, JH, Strandness, DE. (1980). Correlation of arteriographic findings and symptoms in cerebrovascular disease. Neurology, 30, 1041–6.Google Scholar
Torvik, A, Svindland, A, Lindboe, CF. (1989). Pathogenesis of carotid thrombosis. Stroke, 20, 1477–83.Google Scholar
Valton, L, Larrue, V, Le Traon, AP, Massabuau, P, Geraud, G. (1998). Microembolic signals and risk of early recurrence in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack. Stroke, 29, 2125–8.Google Scholar
Van der Grond, J, Balm, R, Kappelle, J, Eikelboom, BC, Mali, WP. (1995). Cerebral metabolism of patients with stenosis or occlusion of the internal carotid artery. Stroke, 26, 822–8.Google Scholar
van Swieten, JC, Koudstaal, PJ, Visser, MC, Schouten, HJ, van Gijn, J. (1988). Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke, 19, 604–7.Google Scholar
Wang, P, Liang, C, Du, J, Li, J. (2013). Effects of carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting on high-risk carotid stenosis patients. Pakistan J Med Sci, 29.Google Scholar
Warfarin Aspirin Recurrent Stroke Study Group. (2001). A comparison of warfarin and aspirin for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med, 345, 1444–51.Google Scholar
Yadav, JS, Wholey, MH, Kuntz, RE, Fayad, P, Katzen, BT, Mishkel, GJ. (2004). Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med, 351, 1493–1501. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa040127.Google Scholar
Zaidat, OO, Fitzsimmons, BF, Woodward, BK, Wang, Z, Killer-0berphalzer, M, Wakhloo, A, et al; VIS- SIT Trial Investigators. (2015). Effect of a balloon-expandable intracranial stent vs medical therapy on risk of stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis: the VISSIT randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 313, 1240–8.Google Scholar
Zhao, XL, Ji, XM, Peng, M, Ling, F. (2003). A follow-up: stroke in patients with bilateral severe carotid stenosis after intervention treatment. Chinese J Clin Rehab, 7, 2714–15.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×