Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:31:20.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 4 - Organized Stroke Care

from Part II - Systems of Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2020

By
Peter Langhorne
Edited by
Jeffrey L. Saver  and
Graeme J. Hankey
Jeffrey L. Saver
Affiliation:
David Geffen School of Medicine, University of Ca
Graeme J. Hankey
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
Get access

Summary

Most patients with suspected stroke should be transported without delay to a hospital, which has access to the required diagnostic tests and appropriate hyperacute treatments 24 h/day and 7 days/week. Once admitted, patients should be managed in a stroke unit rather than a general medical ward. There appears to be no systematic increase in length of hospital stay associated with organized (stroke unit) care. The recent development of hyperacute stroke units is not based on evaluation within RCTs but appears to improve processes of care in the acute phase. Processes of care on a stroke unit should mirror those found to be effective in RCTs. Stroke care should be specialized, organized, and multidisciplinary (i.e. provided by medical, nursing, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, and social work staff who are interested and trained in stroke care). The other beneficial components of organized stroke care are likely to be many, but it remains uncertain which are the most effective. Early discharge from the stroke unit with support from a domiciliary rehabilitation team (coordinated by the stroke unit) promises to reduce hospital length of stay and improve rehabilitation in the home and patient outcome.

Keywords

Stroke unitmultidisciplinaryischaemic strokeintracerebral haemorrhagephysical therapyoccupational therapycare pathwaysrehabilitationspeech and language therapypneumonia
Type
Chapter
Information
Stroke Prevention and Treatment
An Evidence-based Approach
 , pp. 59 - 76
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, D, Gillen, E, Rixson, L. (2009). The effectiveness of integrated care pathways for adults and children in health care settings: a systematic review. JBI Reports, 7(3), 80–129.Google Scholar
ATTEND Collaborative Group. Family-led rehabilitation after stroke in India (ATTEND): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017; 390: 588–599.Google Scholar
AVERT Trial Collaboration Group. (2015). Efficacy and safety of very early mobilisation within 24 h of stroke onset (AVERT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 386, 46–55. pii: S0140-6736(15)60690–0.Google Scholar
Aziz, NA, Leonardi-Bee, J, Phillips, MF, Gladman, J, Legg, LA, Walker, M. (2008). Therapy-based rehabilitation services for patients living at home more than one year after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2, CD005952. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005952.pub2.Google Scholar
Ciccone, A, Celani, MG, Chiaramonte, R, Rossi, C, Righetti, E. (2013). Continuous versus intermittent physiological monitoring for acute stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 5, CD008444. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008444.pub2.Google Scholar
Donnan, GA, Davis, SM. (2003). Neurologist, internist, or strokologist? Stroke, 34(11), 2765.Google Scholar
Evans, A, Perez, I, Harraf, F, Melbourn, A, Steadman, J, Donaldson, N, et al. (2001). Can differences in management processes explain different outcomes between stroke unit and stroke-team care? Lancet, 358(9293), 1586–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Govan, L, Langhorne, P, Weir, C, for the Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. (2007). Does the prevention of complications explain the survival benefit of organised inpatient (stroke unit) care? Further analysis of a systematic review. Stroke, 38, 2536–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Indredavik, B, Bakke, F, Slordahl, SA, Rokseth, R, Haaheim, L. (1999). Treatment in a combined acute and rehabilitation stroke unit. Stroke, 30, 917–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingeman, A, Pedersen, L, Hundborg, HH, Petersen, P, Zielke, S, Mainz, J, et al. (2008).Quality of care and mortality among patients with stroke: a nationwide follow-up study. Med Care, 46(1), 63–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalra, L, Evans, E, Perez, I, Knapp, M, Donaldson, N, Swift, C. (2000). Alternative strategies for stroke care: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 356, 894–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwan, J, Sandercock, P. (2004). In-hospital care pathways for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 4, CD002924.Google Scholar
Langhorne, P, Baylan, S; Early Supported Discharge Trialists. (2017). Services for reducing duration of hospital care for acute stroke patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 7, CD000443. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000443.pub4.Google Scholar
Langhorne, P, Bernhardt, J, Kwakkel, G. (2011). Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet, 377, 1693–702.Google Scholar
Langhorne, P, Collier, JM, Bate, PJ, Thuy, MNT, Bernhardt, J. (2018). Very early versus delayed mobilisation after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 10, CD006187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langhorne, P, Dennis, MS. (1998). Stroke Units: An Evidence-Based Approach. London: BMJ Publishing.Google Scholar
Langhorne, P, Dennis, MS. (2004). Stroke units: the next 10 years. Lancet, 363, 834–5.Google Scholar
Langhorne, P, de Villiers, L, Pandian, JD. (2012). Applicability of stroke-unit care to low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Neurol, 11, 341–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langhorne, P, Dey, P, Woodman, M, Kalra, L, Wood-Dauphinee, S, Patel, N, et al. (2005). Is stroke unit care portable? A systematic review of the clinical trials. Age Ageing, 34, 324–30.Google Scholar
Langhorne, P, O’Donnell, MJ, Chin, SL, Zhang, H, Xavier, D, Avezum, A, et al.; INTERSTROKE Collaborators. (2018).Practice patterns and outcomes after stroke across countries at different economic levels (INTERSTROKE): an international observational study. Lancet, 391(10134), 2019–27.Google Scholar
Langhorne, P, Pollock, A, in conjunction with the Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. (2002). What are the components of effective stroke unit care? Age Ageing, 31(5), 365–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Legg, L, Langhorne, P; Outpatient Service Trialists. (2004). Rehabilitation therapy services for stroke patients living at home: systematic review of randomised trials. Lancet, 363(9406), 352–6.Google Scholar
Major, K, Walker, A. (1998). Economics of stroke unit care. In Langhorne, P, Dennis, M, eds., Stroke Units: An Evidence Based Approach. London: BMJ Books, pp. 56–65.Google Scholar
Ramsay, AI, Morris, S, Hoffman, A, Hunter, RM, Boaden, R, McKevitt, C, et al. (2015). Effects of centralizing acute stroke services on stroke care provision in two large metropolitan areas in England. Stroke, 46(8), 2244–51. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009723.Google Scholar
Saka, O, McGuire, A, Wolfe, C. (2009). Cost of stroke in the United Kingdom. Age Ageing, 38(1), 27–32. doi:10.1093/ageing/afn281.Google Scholar
Saposnik, G, Hill, MD, O’Donnell, M, Fang, J, Hachinski, V, Kapral, MK. (2008). Variables associated with 7-day, 30-day, and 1-year fatality after ischemic stroke. Stroke, 39, 2318–24.Google Scholar
Seenan, P, Long, M, Langhorne, P. (2007). Stroke units in their natural habitat. Stroke, 38, 1886–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shepperd, S, Doll, H, Angus, RM, Clarke, MJ, Iliffe, S, Kalra, L, et al. (2008). Hospital at home admission avoidance. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 4, CD007491. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. (2013). Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 9, CD000197. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000197.pub3.Google Scholar
Terent, A, Asplund, K, Farahmand, B, Henriksson, KM, Norrving, B, Stegmayr, B, et al. (2009). Stroke unit care revisited: who benefits the most? A cohort study of 105 043 patients in Riks-Stroke, the Swedish Stroke Register. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 80, 881–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, M, Barber, M, Dodds, H, Dennis, M, Langhorne, P, Macleod, MJ; on behalf of the Scottish Stroke Care Audit. (2015). The impact of stroke unit care on outcome in a Scottish stroke population, taking into account case mix and selection bias. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 86, 314–8. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2013-307478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veerbeek, JM, van Wegen, E, van Peppen, R, van der Wees, PJ, Hendriks, E, Rietberg, M, et al. (2014).What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 9(2), e87987. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087987. eCollection 2014.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×