Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:09:09.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2024

Sarah Bassett
Sarah Bassett
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Style and Meaning in Late Antique Art
Ancients and Moderns on Seeing and Thinking
 , pp. 221 - 240
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, J. 1962. “A Theory of Style.” JAAC 20.3: 227–37.Google Scholar
Adler, W. 2008. “Early Christian Historians and Historiography.” In The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Studies, edited by Harvey, S. and Hunter, D., 584–602. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ainalov, D. V. 1900. “Ellinisticheskiia osnovy vizantiiskago iskusstva. Izsliedovaniia v oblasti rannevizantiiskago iskusstva.” S. Petersburg: Zapiski Imperatorskago Russkago Arkheologicheskago Obshchestva, XIII. Trudy Otdieleniia Arkheologii drevne-klassicheskoi, vizantiiskoi i zapadno-evropeiskoi, V.Google Scholar
Ainalov, D. V. 1902. “Review of Josef Strzygowski, Orient oder Rom.” Vizantiiskii Vremennik 9: 138–52.Google Scholar
Ainalov, D. V. 1961. The Hellenistic Origins of Byzantine Art. Edited by Mango, C. and translated by Sobolevitch, E. and Sobolevitch, S.. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Andreescu-Treadgold, I. 1992. “The Mosaic Workshop at San Vitale.” In Mosaici a S. Vitali e altri restauri: Il restauro in situ di mosaici parietali. Ravenna, 13 ottobre 1990, edited by Iannucci, A., Fiori, C., and Muscolino, C., 31–41. Ravenna: Longo.Google Scholar
Andreescu-Treadgold, I. 1995. “The Emperor’s New Crown and St. Vitalis’ New Clothes.” CorsiRav 1995: 149–86.Google Scholar
Andreescu-Treadgold, I., and Treadgold, W.. 1997. “Procopius and the Imperial Panels of S. Vitale.” ArtB 79.4: 708–23.Google Scholar
Angelov, D. 2019. The Byzantine Hellene. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anguissola, A. 2015. “Idealplastik and the Relationship between Greek and Roman Sculpture.” In The Oxford Handbook of Roman Sculpture, edited by Friedland, E. A., Sobocinski, M. G., and Gazda, E. K., 240–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
App, U. 2010. The Birth of Orientalism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, . 1932. Aristotle Politics. Translated by Rackham, H.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1995. Aristotle Poetics. Longinus on the Sublime. Demetrius on Style. Translated by Halliwell, S., Hamilton Frye, W., Russell, D. A., Inneds, D. C., and Robert, W. Rhys. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Astorri, G. 1934. “Nuove osservazioni sulla tecnica dei mosaici romani della basilica di S. Maria Maggiore.” RACr 11: 51–72.Google Scholar
Auerbach, E. 2003. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bacci, M. 2014. The Many Faces of Christ: Portraying the Holy in the East and West, 300 to 1300. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Bahr, H., ed. 1903. Gegen Klimt. Vienna: J. Eisenstein.Google Scholar
Barasch, M. 1998. Theories of Art, 3: From Impressionism to Kandinsky. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barber, C. 1990. “The Imperial Panels at San Vitale: A Reconsideration.” BMGS 14: 19–43.Google Scholar
Barber, C., and Papaioannou, S., eds. 2017. Michael Psellos on Literature and Art: A Byzantine Perspective on Aesthetics. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Bartman, E. 1988. “Decor et Duplicatio: Pendants in Roman Sculptural Display.” AJA 92.2: 211–25.Google Scholar
Bassett, S. 2000. “‘Excellent Offerings’: The Lausos Collection in Constantinople.” ArtB 82.1: 6–25.Google Scholar
Bassett, S. 2004. The Urban Image of Late Antique Constantinople. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bassett, S. 2008. “Style and Meaning in the Imperial Panels at San Vitale.” Artibus et Historiae 57: 49–57.Google Scholar
Bassett, S. 2020. “An Icon of John the Baptist.” In The Eloquence of Art: Essays in Honour of Henry Maguire, edited by Lamm, A. O. and Schroeder, R., 18–28. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, F. A. 1996. Stadt, Platz und Denkmal in der Spätantike. Mainz: P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Baxandall, M. 1971. Giotto and the Orators: Humanist Observers and Painting in Italy and the Discovery of Pictorial Composition, 1350–1450. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Baxandall, M. 1972. Painting and Experience in Fifteenth-Century Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Becatti, G. 1957. La Colonna di Marco Aurelio. Milan: Editoriale Domus.Google Scholar
Becatti, G. 1960. La Colonna Coclide Istoriata. Problemi Storici Iconografici Stilistici. Rome: “L’Erma” di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Beckmann, M. 2011. The Column of Marcus Aurelius: The Genesis and Meaning of a Roman Imperial Monument. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckmann, M. 2015. “The Function of the Attribute of Liberalitas and Its Use in the ‘Congiarium.’” AJNum 2.27: 189–98.Google Scholar
Beller, S. 2006. A Concise History of Austria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beller, S., ed. 2001. Rethinking Vienna 1900. Oxford: Berghan Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belting, H. 1994. Likeness and Presence: A History of the Image before the Era of Art. Translated by Jephcott, E.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bergmann, M. 2005. “La ritrattistica privata di età costantiniana: l’abbandono del prototipo imperiale.” In Costantino il Grande. La civiltà antica al bivio tra Occidente e Oriente, edited by Donati, A. and Gentili, G., 157–63. Cinisello Balsamo: Silvana.Google Scholar
Bergmann, M., and Kovacs, M.. 2016. “Portrait Styles.” In The Last Statues of Antiquity, edited by Smith, R. R. R. and Ward-Perkins, B., 280–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bertelli, C. 1955. “Un antico restauro nei musaici di S. Maria Maggiore.” Paragone 6.63: 40–42.Google Scholar
Berthaud, A. 1891. Sancti Augustini doctrina de pulchro ingenuisque artibus e variis illius operibus excerpta. Poitiers.Google Scholar
Besant, A., and Leadbeater, C. W.. 1901. Thought-Forms. London: Theosophical Publishing Society.Google Scholar
Betancourt, R., and Taroutina, M.. 2015. Byzantium/Modernism: The Byzantine as Method in Modernity. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biagetti, B. 1937. “Intorno ai mosaici della navata centrale della basilica di S. Maria Maggiore.” RendPontAcc 13: 101–16.Google Scholar
Biagetti, B. 1947. “L’antica struttura della navata centrale della basilica di S. Maria Maggiore.” RendPontAcc 22: 241–51.Google Scholar
Bialostocki, J. 1966. “Das Modusproblem in den bildenden Künsten: zur Vorgeschichte und zum Nachleben des ‘Modusbriefes’ von Nicholas Poussin.” In Bialistocki, Stil und Ikonographie. Studien zur Kunstwissenschaft, 12–41. Dresden: VEB Verlag der Kunst.Google Scholar
Bianchi Bandinelli, R. 1970. Rome: The Centre of Power. Roman Art to AD 200. Translated by Green, Peter. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
Bianchi Bandinelli, R. 1971. Rome: the Late Empire. Roman Art, AD 200–400. London and New York: Thames and Hudson and George Braziller.Google Scholar
Bianchi Bandinelli, R. 1973. “Spaetantike.” EAA 7: 426–27.Google Scholar
Binski, P. 2004. Becket’s Crown: Art and Imagination in Gothic England, 1170–1300. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Binski, P. 2014. Gothic Wonder: Art, Architecture, and the Decorated Style, 1290–1350. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Blanck, H. 1969. Wiederverwendung alter Statuen als Ehrendenkmäler bei Griechen und Römern. Rome: “L’Erma” di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Bletter, R. H. 1981. “The Interpretation of the Glass Dream – Expressionist Architecture and the History of the Crystal Metaphor.” JSAH 40.1: 20–43.Google Scholar
Bolman, E., ed. 2016. The Red Monastery Church: Beauty and Asceticism in Upper Egypt. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bons, J. A. E. 2007. “Gorgias the Sophist and Early Rhetoric.” In A Companion to Greek Rhetoric, edited by Worthington, I., 37–46. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosio, A. 1632. Roma Sotteranea. Rome: G. Facciotti.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. 1969. Greek Sophists in the Roman Empire. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brailsford, J. W. 1955. The Mildenhall Treasure: A Handbook. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Brendel, O. 1953. “Prolegomena to a Book on Roman Art.” MAAR 21: 7–73.Google Scholar
Brendel, O. 1979. Prolegomena to the Study of Roman Art. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Brenk, B. 1975. Die frühchristlichen Mosaiken in S. Maria Maggiore zu Rom. Wiesbaden: Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Brilliant, R. 1984. Visual Narratives: Storytelling in Etruscan and Roman Art. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P. 1971. The World of Late Antiquity, AD 150–750. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Brown, P. 1988. The Body and Society: Men, Women, and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P. 1992. Power and Persuasion in Late Antiquity: Towards a Christian Empire. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Brush and Pencil. 1901. Review of Roman Art by F. Wickhoff. Brush and Pencil 7.2: 128.Google Scholar
Bruyne, L. de. 1938. “Intorno ai mosaici della navata di S. Maria Maggiore.” RACr 15: 281–318.Google Scholar
Buberl, P. 1936. “Das Problem der Wiener Genesis.” JbKSWien, N.F.10: 9–58.Google Scholar
Buberl, P., and Gerstinger, H.. 1937. Der Wiener Dioskurides und die Wiener Genesis = Die Byzantinischen Handschriften, vol. 1. Leipzig: Karl W. Hiersman.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, J. 1956. The Age of Constantine the Great. Translated by Hadas, M.. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 1991. Christianity and the Rhetoric of Empire: The Development of Christian Discourse. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, J. 2010. “Narrative Reliefs of the Arch of Constantine and the Panegyrici Latini.” New England Classical Journal 37.3: 163–176.Google Scholar
Carruthers, M. 1990. “‘Ut pictura poesis’: The Rhetoric of Verbal and Visual Images.” Mentalities/Mentalités 7.1: 1–6.Google Scholar
Carruthers, M. 1998. The Craft of Thought: Meditation, Rhetoric, and the Making of Images, 400–1200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carruthers, M. 2007. “Sweetness.” Speculum 81: 999–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, M. 2013. The Experience of Beauty in the Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, M., ed. 2010. Rhetoric beyond Words: Delight and Persuasion in the Arts of the Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cecchelli, C. 1956. I mosaici della basilica di Santa Maria Maggiore. Turin: ILTE.Google Scholar
Chadwick, H. 1993. “Bishops and Monks.” StP 24: 45–61.Google Scholar
Chesnut, G. 1986. The First Christian Histories: Eusebius, Socrates, Sozomen, Theodoret, and Evagrius. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press.Google Scholar
Cicero, . 1942. The Making of the Orator, 2 vols. Translated by Rackham, H.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cicero, . 1949. On Invention. The Best Kind of Orator. Topics. Translated by Hubbell, H. M.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, D. L. 1957. Rhetoric in Greco-Roman Education. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, T. J. 1984. The Painting of Modern Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, T. J. 1999. Farewell to an Idea: Episodes from the History of Modernism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. 2000. The Column of Trajan. Rome: Colombo, in collaboration with the German Archaeological Institute.Google Scholar
Conkey, M., and Haslof, C., eds. 1990. Uses of Style in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. 2007. “The New World Order: Greek Rhetoric in Rome.” In A Companion to Greek Rhetoric, edited by Worthington, I., 139–65. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Corbier, M. 2006. “Congiarium.” In New Pauly Online, http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1574-9347_bnp_e304050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbier, M., and Schneider, H.. 2006. “Liberalitas, Largitio.” In New Pauly Online, http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1574-9347_bnp_e703670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordileone, D. 2014. Alois Riegl in Vienna, 1875–1905: An Institutional Biography. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Corpus Rhetoricum. 2008–2009. Corpus Rhetoricum, 2 vols. Edited and translated by Patillon, M.. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. 1988. “The Witness of John the Baptist on an Early Byzantine Icon in Kiev.” DOP 42, 1–11.Google Scholar
Cribiore, R. 1996. Writing, Teachers, and Students in Greco-Roman Egypt. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Cribiore, R. 2001. Gymnastics of the Mind: Greek Education in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croke, B., and Emmett, A. M., eds. 1983. History and Historians in Late Antiquity. Sydney: Pergamum.Google Scholar
Crum, W. E. 1901. “Communiqué on Strzygowski’s Orient oder Rom, Leipzig, 1901.” CR 15.4:232–34.Google Scholar
Dalton, O. M. 1911. Byzantine Art and Archaeology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, O. M. 1925. East Christian Art: A Survey of the Monuments. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
D’Angour, A. 2015. “Sense and Sensation in Music.” In A Companion to Ancient Aesthetics, edited by Destrée, P. and Murray, P., 188–202. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, A. M. 1911. Review of The Art of the Romans by H. B. Walters. JRS 1: 241–42.Google Scholar
Davis–Weyer, C. 1986. Early Medieval Art, 300–1150. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Deckers, J. G. 1976. Der alttestamentliche Zyklus von S. Maria Maggiore in Rom. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
Deckers, J. G. 2002. “Der erste Diener Christi. Die Proskynese der Kaiser als Schlüsselmotiv der Mosaiken in San Vitale (Ravenna) und in der Haghia Sophia (Istanbul).” In Art, Cérémonial et Liturgie au Moyen Âge, Actes du Colloque de 3e Cycle Romand de Lettres, Lausanne-Fribourg, 24–25 mars, 14–15 avril, 12–13 mai 2000, edited by Bock, N., 11–57. Rome: Viella.Google Scholar
De Grummond, N. 1996. Encyclopedia of the History of Classical Archaeology, 2 vols. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Deichmann, F. W. 1948. Frühchristliche Kirchen in Rom. Basel: A. M. Erbach.Google Scholar
Deichmann, F. W. 1953. “Gründung und Datierung von San Vitale in Ravenna.” In Arte del Primo Milllenio. 2e Congrès International pour l’Étude du Haut Moyen Age, Pavia 1950, 111–17, 188–90. Turin: A. Viglonglo.Google Scholar
Deichmann, F. W. 1969–1989. Ravenna: Hauptstadt des spätantiken Abendlandes, 2 vols. Wiesbaden: F. Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Deichmann, F. W. 1983. Einführung in die christliche Archäologie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Delbrueck, R. 1929. Die Consulardiptychen und verwandte Denkmäler, 2 vols. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Deliyannis, D. M. 2010. Ravenna in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Maria, S. 1988. Gli archi onorari di Roma dell’Italia romana. Rome: “L’Erma” di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Depeyrot, G. 2010. La Colonne de Marc Aurèle, 2 vols. Wetteren: Moneta.Google Scholar
Dionysius of Halicarnassus, . 1974–1985. Critical Essays, 2 vols. Translated by Usher, S.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dilly, H. 1979. Kunstgeschichte als Institution: Studien zur Geschichte einer Diziplin. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Dimand, M. S. 1940. “In Memoriam Josef Strzygowski.” AI 7: 177.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. 1965. Pagan and Christian in an Age of Anxiety: Some Aspects of Religious Experience from Marcus Aurelius to Constantine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohrn, T. 1949. “Spätantikes Silber aus Britannien.” MDAI 2: 67–139.Google Scholar
Donohue, A. A. 2005. Greek Sculpture and the Problem of Description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Droge, A. J. 1989. Homer or Moses? Early Christian Interpretations of the History of Culture. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Drucker, J., et al. 2014. “Modernism.” In Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199747108.001.0001/acref-9780199747108-e-507?rskey=HbhUpZ&result=1.Google Scholar
Dyson, S. 2006. In Pursuit of Ancient Pasts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastmond, A. 2010. “Consular Diptychs, Rhetoric and the Languages of Art in Sixth-Century Constantinople.” AH 33.5: 742–65.Google Scholar
Eck, C. van. 2007. Classical Rhetoric and the Visual Arts in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eichler, F. 1939. “Das sogenannte Partherdenkmal von Ephesos.” In Bericht über den VI. Internationalen Kongress für Archäologie, 488–94. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Eichler, F. 1971. “Zum Partherdenkmal von Ephesos.” ÖJh 49 Beihefte: 102–36.Google Scholar
Eitelberger, R. von. 1861. “Die mittelalterlichen Kunstdenkmale Dalmatiens in Arbe, Zara, Nona, Sebenico, Traù, Spalato und Ragusa, aufgenommen und dargestellt vom Architekten W. Zimmermann.” Jahrbuch der k. k. Central-Commission zur Erforschung und Erhaltung der Baudenkmale 5: 129–312.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 1995. Art and the Roman Viewer. The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2000. “Frontality in the Column of Marcus Aurelius.” In La colonne Aurélienne. Autour de la colonne Aurélienne, geste et image sur la colonne de Marc Aurèle à Rome, edited by Scheid, J. and Huet, V., 251–56. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2002. “The Birth of Late Antiquity: Riegl and Strzygowski in 1901.” AH 25: 358–79.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2003. “Style.” In Critical Terms for Art History, 2nd ed., edited by Nelson, R. and Schiff, R., 98–110. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2007. Roman Eyes: Visuality and Subjectivity in Art and Text. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsner, J. 2019. “The Viennese Invention of Late Antiquity: Between Politics and Religion in the Forms of Late Antique Art.” In Empires of Faith in Late Antiquity: Histories of Art and Religion from India to Ireland, edited by Elsner, J., 110–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elsner, J., ed. 1996. Art and Text in Roman Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elsner, J., and Bowie, E., eds. 2009. Philostratus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elsner, J., and Meyer, M., eds. 2014. Art and Rhetoric in Roman Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engemann, J. 1984. “Die religiöse Herrscherfunktion im Fünfsäulenmonument Diocletians in Rom und in den Herrschermosaiken Justinians in Ravenna.” FS 18: 336–56.Google Scholar
Engemann, J. 1999. “Das Apotheosebild des Partherdenkmals aus Ephesos.” In 100 Jahre österreichische Forschungen in Ephesos: Akten des Symposions Wien 1995, edited by Friesinger, H. and Krinzinger, F., 633–37. Vienna: Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Etingroph, O. E. 2005. Byzantine Icons of the 5th to the First Half of the 8th Century in Russia. Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar
Eusebius of Caesarea, . 1926–1932. Ecclesiastical History, 2 vols. Translated by Lake, K.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, E. 1969. Physiognomics in the Ancient World. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyice, S. 1958. “Neue Fragmente der Theodosiussäule.” IstMitt 8: 144–47.Google Scholar
Faust, S. 2012a. “Prestige in der Provinz: Zum Bildprogramm des Partherdenkmals von Ephesos Munich.” In Ansehenssache. Formen von Prestige in Kulturen des Altertums, edited by Christiansen, B. and Thaler, U., 319–52. Munich: Herbert Utz.Google Scholar
Faust, S. 2012b. Schlachtenbilder der römischen Kaiserzeit: Erzählerische Darstellungskonzepte in der Reliefkunst von Traian bis Septimius Severus. Rahden Westf: Verlag Marie Leidorft.Google Scholar
Fechner, G. 1848. Nanna oder über das Seelenleben der Pflanzen. Leipzig: Leopold Voß.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fechner, G. 1851. Zend-Avesta oder über die Dinge des Himmels und des Jenseits. Leipzig: Leopold Voß.Google Scholar
Fechner, G. 1860. Elemente der Psychophysik, 2 vols. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.Google Scholar
Fentress, J., and Wickham, C.. 1992. Social Memory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fıratlı, N. 1990. La sculpture byzantine figurée au Musée Archéologique d’Istanbul; Catalogue revue et présenté par C. Metzger. Paris: Librairie d’Amérique et d’Orient Adrien Maisonneuve, Jean Maisonneuve Successeur.Google Scholar
Foletti, I., and Lovino, F.. 2019. Orient oder Rom? History and Reception of a Historiographical Myth (1901–1970). Rome: Viella.Google Scholar
Ford, A. 2001. “Sophists without Rhetoric: The Arts of Speech in Fifth-Century Athens.” In Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity, edited by Too, Yun Lee, 85–109. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowden, G. 2014. Before and after Muhammad: The First Millennium Refocused. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Francis, J. 1995. Subversive Virtue: Asceticism and Authority in the Second-Century Pagan World. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Frantová, Z. 2019. Ravenna: Sedes Imperii, Artistic Trajectories in the Late Antique Mediterranean. Rome: Viella.Google Scholar
Frend, W. H. C. 1995. The Archaeology of Early Christianity. London: Geoffrey Chapman.Google Scholar
Fullerton, M. 1990. The Archaistic Style in Roman Statuary. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galbreath, R. 1986. “Theosophy.” In The Spiritual in Art: Abstract Painting 1890–1985, edited by Tuchman, M. and Freedman, J., 388–89. New York: Abbeville Press.Google Scholar
Galen, . 1981. On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato. Edited, translated, and commented on by De Lacy, P., 2nd ed. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Galen, . 2020. On Temperaments; On Non-uniform Distemperment; The Soul’s Traits Depend on Bodily Temperament. Edited and translated by Johnston, I.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gamwell, L. 2002. Exploring the Invisible: Art, Science and the Spiritual. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gandelman, C. 1982. “Thomas Mann and the Theory of ‘Crystalline Beauty’.” Orbis Litterarum 37: 122–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganschow, T. 1986. “Überlegungen zum Partherdenkmal von Ephesos.” AA: 209–21.Google Scholar
Gardner, P. 1901. “Wickhoff and Strong’s Roman Art.” CR 15.1: 89–92.Google Scholar
Garrucci, P. R. 1872–1888. Storia della Arte Cristiana, 6 vols. Prato: Francesco Giachetti.Google Scholar
Gehn, U. 2012. Ehrenstatuen in der Spätantike. Chlamydati und Togati. Wiesbaden: Reichert.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerstinger, A. G. 1931. Die Wiener Genesis. Vienna: Filser.Google Scholar
Geyer, A. 2006. “Bibelepik und frühchristlichen Bildzyklen: die Mosaiken von Santa Maria Maggiore in Rom.” RM 112: 296–321.Google Scholar
Giacomini, F. 2005. “Considerazioni sul restauro dei mosaici delle basiliche romane nella prima metà dell’Ottocento: un punto di vista indulgente.” Arte Medievale, n.s. 4.2: 127–36.Google Scholar
Giardina, A. 1999. “Esplosione di Tardoantico.” Studi Storici 40.1: 157–80.Google Scholar
Giglioli, G. 1952. La Colonna di Arcadio a Costantinopoli. Naples: G. Macchiaroli.Google Scholar
Giuliano, A. 1957. Catalogo dei ritratti romani del Museo Profano Lateranense. Vatican City: Tipografia poliglotta vaticana.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, R. C. 1940. Paulinus’ Churches at Nola: Texts, Translation and Commentary. Amsterdam: N.v. Noord-Hollandsche utigevers maatschappij.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H. 1968. “Style.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan. Republished in The Art of Art History: A Critical Anthology, edited by D. Preziozi, 143–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. 1975. “The Status of Style.” CI 1.4: 799–811.Google Scholar
Grabar, A. 1936. L’Empereur dans l’art byzantin. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Grabar, A. 1945. “Plotin et les origines de l’esthétique médiévale.” CahArch 1: 15–36.Google Scholar
Grabar, A. 1960. “Quel est le sens de l’offrande de Justinien et Theodora sur les mosaïques de Saint-Vital?” FR 81: 63–77.Google Scholar
Grabar, A. 1968. Christian Iconography: A Study of Its Origins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gran-Aymerian, E. 1998. Naissance de l’archéologie moderne, 1798–1945. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
Greenberg, C. 1961. “Byzantine Parallels.” In Art and Culture: Critical Essays, edited by Greenberg, C., 167–70. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nazianzen, . 1894a. “Funeral Oration on the Great Saint Basil, Bishop of Caesarea in Cappadocia.” NPNF2 7: 785–831.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nazianzen, . 1894b. “Oration 39: On the Holy Lights.” NPNF2 7: 702–18.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J., and Rengakos, A., eds. 2009. Narratology and Interpretation: The Content of Narrative Form in Ancient Literature. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griebel, J. 2013. Das Kaiser im Krieg: Die Bilder der Säule des Marc Aurel. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, J., and Grimm, W., eds. 1887. Deutsches Wörterbuch, 10 vols. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.Google Scholar
Gustav-Lübke Museum der Stadt Haam. 1996. Ägypten, Schätze aus dem Wüstensand: Kunst und Kultur der Christen am Nil: Katalog zur Ausstellung. Edited by the Gustav- Lübke-Museum der Stadt Hamm and the Museum für Spätantike und Byzantinische Kunst, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin-Preussischer Kulturbesitz. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Hallett, C. H. 1986. “The origins of classical style in sculpture.” JHS 106: 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliwell, S. 2002. The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliwell, S. 2009. “The Theory and Practice of Narrative in Plato.” In Narratology and Interpretation: The Content of Narrative Form in Ancient Literature, edited by Grethlein, J. and Rengakos, A., 15–49. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halporn, J., Ostwald, M., and Rosenmayer, T.. 1963. The Meters of Greek and Latin Poetry. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Harley-McGowan, F., and Maguire, H., eds. 2017. Ernst Kitzinger and the Making of Medieval Art History. London: Warburg Institute.Google Scholar
Harris, W. 1989. Ancient Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haüy, R. J. 1784. Essai d’une théorie sur la structure des crystaux, appliquée à plusieurs genres de substances crystallisées. Paris: Chez Gogué & Née de la Rochelle.Google Scholar
Haüy, R. J. 1801. Traité des minéralogies. Paris: Chez Louis.Google Scholar
Haüy, R. J. 1822. Traité de crystallographie, 2 vols. Paris : Bachelier et Huzard.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1971. Hegel’s Philosophy of Mind, Being Part Three of the Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences (1830). Translated by Wallace, W.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1975. Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art by G. W. F. Hegel, vol. 1. Translated by Knox, T. M.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. von. 1925. Treatise on Physiological Optics, 3 vols. Translated by Southall, J. P. C.. Rochester, NY: Optical Society of America.Google Scholar
Hermogenes of Tarsus, . 1913. Hermogenis opera. Edited by Rabe, H.. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Hermogenes of Tarsus, . 1987. Hermogenes on Types of Style. Translated by Wooten, C.. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, E. E., Koehler, W. R. W., and Morey, C. R.. 1942. “Josef Strzygowski.” Speculum 17: 460–61.Google Scholar
Hill, G. 1945. “Ormonde Maddock Dalton, 1866–1945.” ProcBrAc 31: 357–53.Google Scholar
Hinks, D. A. G. 1940. “From Tisias to Corax and the Invention of Rhetoric.” CQ 34: 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, R. 2016. The Mildenhall Treasure: Late Roman Silver Plate from East Anglia. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Hofmann, C., ed. 2020. The Vienna Genesis: Material Analysis and Conservation of a Late Antique Illuminated Manuscript on Purple Parchment. Vienna: Böhlau.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmannsthal, H. von. 1979–1980. Gesammelte Werke in zehn Einzelbänden, 10 vols. Edited by Schoeller, B. and Hirsch, R.. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer-Taschenbuch-Verlag.Google Scholar
Holder, A., ed. 2005. The Blackwell Companion to Christian Spirituality. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holland, L. B. 1946. “The Triple Arch of Augustus.” AJA 50: 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, P. 2002. The Origins of Roman Historical Commemoration in the Visual Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holliday, P., ed. 1993. Narrative and Event in Ancient Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. 2004. The Language of Images in Roman Art. Translated by Snodgrass, A. and Künzl-Snodgrass, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horace, . 1926. Satires. Epistles. The Art of Poetry. Translated by Fairclough, H. Rushton. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, J. 2014. “Memory and the Roman Viewer: Looking at the Arch of Constantine.” In Memoria Romana: Memory in Rome and Rome in Memory, edited by Galinsky, K., 103–15. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hunger, H. 1978. Die hochsprachliche profane Literatur der Byzantiner, 2 vols. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Iannucci, A. M., Fiori, C., and Muscolino, C., eds. 1992. Mosaici a S. Vitale e altri restauri. Il restauro in situ di mosaici parietali. Atti del Convegno nazionale sul restauro in situ di mosaici parietali, Ravenna 1–3 ottobre 1990. Ravenna: Longo.Google Scholar
Inan, J., and Rosenbaum, E.. 1966. Roman and Early Byzantine Portrait Sculpture in Asia Minor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, M. 1993. Alois Riegl: Art History and Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. 1939. Paideia, the Ideals of Greek Culture. Translated by Highet, Gilbert. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
James, L., ed. 2007. Art and Text in Byzantine Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
James, L., and Webb, R.. 1991. “‘To understand ultimate things and enter secret places’: Ekphrasis and Art in Byzantium.” AH 14: 1–17.Google Scholar
Jan, K. von. 1895. Musici Scriptores Graeci. Aristoteles, Euclides, Nicomachus, Bacchius Gaudentius, Alypius et melodiarum veterum quidquid exstat. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Josephus, . 1926–1965. Jewish Antiquities, 8 vols. Translated by Thackeray, H. St. J., Marcus, R., Feldman, L. H., and Wikgren, A.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kandinsky, W. 1912. Über das Geistige in der Kunst. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar
Kandinsky, W. 1977. Concerning the Spiritual in Art. Translated Sadler, M. T. H.. New York: Dover Publications. Original English edition first published as The Art of Spiritual Harmony, London: A. Constable & Company, 1914.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. 1989. Guardians of Language: The Grammarian and Society in Late Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. 1963. The Art of Persuasion in Greece. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. 1972. The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World, 300 B.C.–A.D. 300. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. 1983. Greek Rhetoric under Christian Emperors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. 1999. Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. 2003. Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks for Prose Composition. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. 2009. A New History of Classical Rhetoric. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, J. P. C., and Painter, K. S.. 1977. Wealth of the Roman World: Gold and Silver AD 300–700. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Kiilerich, B. 1993. Late Fourth Century Classicism in the Visual Arts. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
Kinney, D. 2016. “The Type of the Triconch Basilica.” In The Red Monastery Church: Beauty and Asceticism in Upper Egypt, edited by Bolman, E., 37–48. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, E. 1934. “Römische Malerei vom Beginn des 7. bis zur Mitte des 8. Jahrhunderts.” Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der Philosophischen Fakultät (I. Sektion) der Ludwig Maximilians Universität zu München.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, E. 1940. Early Medieval Art in the British Museum. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, E. 1958. “Byzantine Art in the Period between Justinian and Iconoclasm.” Berichte zum XI. internationalen Byzantinisten-Kongress, München, 4.1: 1–50. Republished in The Art of Byzantium and the Medieval West: Selected Studies by Ernst Kitzinger, edited by W. Eugene Kleinbauer, 157–232; 391–93. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, E. 1967. “On the Interpretation of Stylistic Change in Late Antique Art.” Bucknell Review 15.3: 1–10.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, E. 1975. “The Role of Miniature Painting in Mural Decoration.” In The Place of Book Illumination in Byzantine Art, edited by Weitzmann, K., Loerke, W. C., Kitzinger, E., and Buchthal, H., 99–142. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, E. 1977. Byzantine Art in the Making: Main Lines of Stylistic Development in Mediterranean Art. 2nd–7th Centuries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, E. 1981. “The Hellenistic Heritage in Byzantine Art Reconsidered.” JÖB 31.2: 657–75.Google Scholar
Knudsen, S. 1989. “Spolia: The So-Called Historical Frieze on the Arch of Constantine.” AJA 93: 267–68.Google Scholar
Kollwitz, J. 1941. Oströmische Plastik der theodosianischen Zeit. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kollwitz, J. 1965. “Ravenna zwischen Orient und Occident.” In Atti VI Congresso internazionale di Archeologia Cristiana, Ravenna, 1962, 383–402. Vatican City: Pontificio Istituto di Archaeologia Christiana.Google Scholar
Kölzer, T. 2010. “Diplomatics.” In Handbook of Medieval Studies: Terms, Methods, Trends, edited by Classen, A., 405–24. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kondakov, N. P. 1877. Istoriya vizantiyskogo iskusstva ikonografii po miniatyram grecheskikh rukopsey (History of Byzantine Art and Iconography through the Miniatures of Byzantine Manuscripts). Odessa.Google Scholar
Kondakov, N. P. 1886. Histoire de l’Art Byzantin, 2 vols. Translated by Trawinski, M.. Paris: Jules Roam.Google Scholar
Kondakov, N. P. 1889–1891. Russkiye drvnosti v. pamiatnikoskh, 6 vols. St. Petersburg: A. Benke.Google Scholar
Kondakov, N. P. 1892. Antiquités de la Russie Méridionale. Paris: Ernest Leroux.Google Scholar
Kovacs, M. 2014. Kaiser, Senatoren und Gelehrte. Untersuchungen zum spätantiken männlichen Privatpörträt. Wiesbaden: Reichert.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, F. X. 1896. Geschichte der Christlichen Kunst, 2 vols. Freiburg im Breisgau: Harder’sche Verlagshandlung.Google Scholar
Krause, M. 1971. “Zur Lokalisierung und Datierung koptischer Denkmäler. Das Tafelbild Bischofs Abrahams.” ZÄS 97: 106–11.Google Scholar
Krautheimer, R. 1967. Corpus basilicarum christianarum Romae. Le basiliche cristiane antiche di Roma (sec. IV–IX) = The Early Christian Basilicas of Rome (IV–IX cent), vol. 3. Città del Vaticano: Pontificio Istituto di Archeologia Cristiana.Google Scholar
Krumbacher, K. 1895. “W. Ritter von Hartel and Frs. Wickhoff, Die Wiener Genesis,” ByzZeit 4: 639–43.Google Scholar
Kuhoff, W. 1991. “Ein Mythos in der römischen Geschichte: Der Sieg Konstantins des Großen über Maxentius vor den Toren Roms am 28. Oktober 312 n. Chr.” Chiron 21: 127–74.Google Scholar
Kunze, C. 2014. “Formal Approaches.” In The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Art and Architecture, edited by Marconi, C., 541–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Künzle, P. 1961–1962. “Per una vision organica dei mosaici antichi di Santa Maria Maggiore.” RendPontAcc 34: 153–90.Google Scholar
Lachnit, E. 2003. “Franz Wickhoff,” in Grove Art Online, https://doi.org/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.T091470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambeck, P., and de Nessel, D.. 1690. Catalogus, sive recensio specilis omnium codicum manuscriptorum graecorum, nec non linguarum orientalium, augustissimae Bibliothecae caesareae Vindobonensis. Vienna and Nuremberg: L. Voight and J. B. Endleri.Google Scholar
Landskron, A. 2006. “Antike Bildsprache und das sog. Partherdenkmal.” In Akten des 10. Österreichischen Archäologentages in Graz, 7.–9. November 2003, 107–12. Vienna: Phoibos.Google Scholar
Lang, B., ed. 1987. The Concept of Style. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
La Rocca, E., Parisis Presicce, C., and Lo Monaco, A., eds. 2015. L’Età dell’angoscia. Da Commodo a Diocleziano (180–305 d.C.). Rome: MondoMostre.Google Scholar
Lazarev, V. V. 1967. Storia della pittura bizantina. Translated by Fossati, G.. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Leadbetter, C. W. 1902. Man Visible and Invisible: Examples of Different Types of Men as Seen By Means of Trained Clairvoyance. New York: John Lane.Google Scholar
Leader-Newby, R. E. 2004. Silver and Society in Late Antiquity: Functions and Meanings of Silver Plate in the Fourth through Seventh Centuries. Abingdon: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Lee, R. W. 1955. “Charles Rufus Morey.” ArtB 37: ii–viii.Google Scholar
Leftwich, G. 1995. “Polykleitos and Hippokratic Medicine.” In Polykleitos, the Doryphoros, and Tradition, edited by Moon, W., 38–51. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann-Hartleben, K. 1926. Die Trajanssäule. Ein römisches Kunstwerk zu Beginn der Spätantike, 2 vols. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Leibescheutz, W. 2005. “The Birth of Late Antiquity.” AntTard 12: 253–61.Google Scholar
Lenaghan, J. 2016. “Reuse in 4th-Century Portrait Statues.” In The Last Statues of Antiquity, edited by Smith, R. R. R. and Ward-Perkins, B., 267–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lenoir, A. A. 1818. Atlas des monuments des arts libéraux, mécaniques et industriels de la France, depuis les Gaulois jusqu’au règne de François Ier. Paris: J. Techener.Google Scholar
Lenski, N., and Koortbojian, M.. 2023. “The Constantinian Frieze on the Arch of Constantine: The Weight of the Evidence.” RM: 129. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Lhotsky, A. 1954. Geschichte des Instituts für österreichische Geschichtsforschung, 1854–1954. Graz: Hermann Böhlaus Nachf.Google Scholar
Lidova, M. 2015. “The Imperial Theotokos: Revealing the Concept of Early Christian Imagery in Santa Maria Maggiore in Rome.” Convivium 2.2: 60–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidova, M. 2019. “The Rise of Byzantine Art and Archaeology in Late Imperial Russia.” In Empires of Faith in Late Antiquity: Histories of Art and Religion from India to Ireland, edited by Elsner, J., 128–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lipps, T. 1897. Raumästhetik und geometrisch-optische Täuschungen. Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
Lipps, T. 1903. Ästhetik. Psychologie des Schönen und der Kunst, Grundlegen der Ästhetik. Hamburg: Leopold Voss.Google Scholar
Lipps, T. 1906. Ästhetik. Psychologie des Schönen und der Kunst. Die ästhetische Betrachtung und die bildende Kunst. Hamburg: Leopold Voss.Google Scholar
Liveley, G. 2019. Narratology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
L’Orange, H. P. 1933. Studien zur Geschichte des spätantiken Porträts. Oslo: H. Aschenhoug & Co.Google Scholar
L’Orange, H. P. 1965. Art Forms and Civic Life in the Later Roman Empire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
L’Orange, H. P. 1973. “The Origin of Medieval Portraiture.” In Likeness and Icon, 91–102. Odense: Odense University Press. Originally published in Acta Congressus Maadvigiani. Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Classical Studies, vol. 3: 53–70. Copenhagen: E. Munksgaard, 1957.Google Scholar
L’Orange, H. P., and von Gerkan, A.. 1939. Der spätantike Bildschmuck des Konstantinsbogens, 2 vols. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lübke, W. 1885. Outlines of Art History. Translated by Burlingame, E. L.. New York: Dodd, Mead & Co.Google Scholar
Lucian of Samosata, . 1913–79. Lucian, 8 vols. Translated by Harmon, A. M., MacLeod, M. D., and Kilburn, K.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Macartney, C. A. 1969. The Habsburg Empire, 1790–1918. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
MacDonald, W. L. 1986. Architecture of the Roman Empire, Volume II: An Urban Appraisal. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Machado, C. 2021. “The Statue Habit and Statue Culture in Late Antique Rome.” JRA 34.2: 632–66.Google Scholar
McClanan, A. 2002. Representations of Early Byzantine Empresses: Image and Empire. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCormack, S. 1981. Art and Ceremony in Late Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Maguire, H. 1974. “Truth and Convention in Byzantine Descriptions of Works of Art.” DOP 28: 113–40.Google Scholar
Maguire, H. 1977. “The Depiction of Sorrow in Middle Byzantine Art.” DOP 31:123–74.Google Scholar
Maguire, H. 1981. Art and Eloquence in Byzantium. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Maguire, H. 1987. Earth and Ocean: The Terrestrial World in Early Byzantine Art. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Maguire, H. 1989. “Style and Ideology in Byzantine Imperial Art.” Gesta 28: 217–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, H. 1993. “Disembodiment and Corporeality in Byzantine Images of the Saints.” In Iconography at the Crossroads, edited by Cassidy, B., 75–83. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Maguire, H. 1995. “Two Modes of Narration in Byzantine Art.” In Byzantine East, Latin West: Art Historical Studies in Honor of Kurt Weitzmann, edited by Mouriki, D., Moss, C., and Kiefer, K., 385–95. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Maguire, H. 1996. The Icons of Their Bodies: Saints and Their Images in Byzantium. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Maguire, H. 1999. “The Profane Aesthetic in Byzantine Art and Literature.” DOP 53: 189–205.Google Scholar
Maguire, H. 2005. “Rhetoric and Reality in Byzantine Art.” Rhetorik. Ein internationales Jahrbuch 24: 14–26.Google Scholar
Maguire, H. 2011a. “The Realities of Ekphrasis.” BSl 69: 7–19.Google Scholar
Maguire, H. 2011b. “La rhétorique et l’esthétique de l’art byzantine.” In La rhétorique des arts : actes du colloque tenu au Collège de France, edited by Pernot, L., 45–72. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, H. 2017. “Rhetoric and Artistry in Early Byzantium.” In Handbuch Rhetorik der bildenden Künste, edited by Brassat, W., 185–206. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malgrave, H., and Ikonomou, E., eds. and trans. 1994. Empathy, Form, and Space: Problems in German Aesthetics, 1873–1893. Santa Monica, CA: Getty Center.Google Scholar
Manara, J. E. 1983. “Di un ipotesi per l’individuazzione dei personnaggi nei panelli del S. Vitale a Ravenna e per la loro interpretazione.” FR 4th series 125–26, 13–37.Google Scholar
Mander, W. 2022. “Pantheism.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/pantheism/.Google Scholar
Marchand, S. L. 1994. “The Rhetoric of Artifacts and the Decline of Classical Humanism: The Case of Josef Strzygowski.” History and Theory, Beiheft 33: 106–33.Google Scholar
Marchand, S. L. 1996. Down from Olympus. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchand, S. L. 2001. “German Orientalism and the Decline of the West.” PAPS 145.4: 465–73.Google Scholar
Marchand, S. L. 2009. German Orientalism in the Age of Empire. Washington, DC, and New York: German Historical Institute and Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marrou, H. 1956. A History of Education in Antiquity. Translated by Lamb, G.. New York: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar
Marsengill, K. 2011. “Portraits and Icons in Antiquity.” In Transition to Christianity: Art of Late Antiquity, 3rd–7th c., edited by Lazaridou, A., 61–67. New York: Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation.Google Scholar
Marsengill, K. 2013. Portraits and Icons: Between Reality and Spirituality in Byzantine Art. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Martin, J. 2010. Der Weg zur Ewigkeit führt über Rom: die Frühgeschichte des Papsttums und die Darstellung der neutestamentlichen Heilsgeschichte im Triumphbogenmosaik von Santa Maria Maggiore in Rom. Stuttgart: Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Marquand, A. 1910. “Strzygowski and His Theory of Early Christian Art.” HTR 3.3: 357–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masner, K. 1893a. “Archaeologische Ausstellung im K .K. Oesterr. Museum 1893.” Mitteilungen des k.k. Oesterreich. Museums für Kunst und Industrie 88.331: 349–50.Google Scholar
Masner, K. 1893b. Katalog der archaeologischen Ausstellung, 22. Mai bis 31. August 1893. Vienna: Verlag des K. K. Oesterr. Museums.Google Scholar
Mathew, G. 1963. Byzantine Aesthetics. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
Mathews, T. 1971. The Early Churches of Constantinople, Architecture and Liturgy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Mathiesen, T. 1999. Apollo’s Lyre: Greek Music in Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Mathiesen, T., ed. 1998. Greek Views of Music. New York: Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Mazal, O. 1980. Kommentar zur Wiener Genesis: Faksimile-Ausgabe der Codex theol.gr. 31 der Österreichischen Nationalbibliothek in Wien. Frankfurt am Main: Insel.Google Scholar
Mazza, M. 2005. “Spätantike: genesi e trasformazioni di un tema storiografico (da Burckhardt a Mickwitz e Marrou via Riegl).” Mediterraneo antico 7.2: 586–638.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, N. 2001. “Critical Theory Meets America: Riesman, Fromm and the Lonely Crowd.” American Sociologist 32.1: 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meiering, R. 1987. Literary and Rhetorical Theories in Greek Scholia. Groningen: E. Forsten.Google Scholar
Menander Rhetor, . 1981. Menander Rhetor: A Commentary. Edited and translated by Russell, D. A. and Wilson, N. G.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milburn, R. L. P. 1954. Early Christian Interpretations of History. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1963. “Pagan and Christian Historiography in the Fourth Century A.D.” In The Conflict between Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth Century, 79–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Reprinted in Essays in Ancient and Modern Historiography, ed. Momigliano, A. and Grafton, A., 107–26. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1990. The Classical Foundations of Modern Historiography. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Montfaucon, B. de. 1729–1734. Les monuments de la monarchie françoise qui comprennent l’histoire de France, avec les figures de chaque règne que l’injure des tems a épargnées, 5 vols. Paris: J. M. Gandouin and P. F. Giffart.Google Scholar
Morey, C. R. 1924. “The Sources of Medieval Style.” ArtB 7.2: 35–50.Google Scholar
Morey, C. R. 1929. “Notes on East Christian Miniatures.” ArtB 11: 4–103.Google Scholar
Morey, C. R. 1942. Medieval Art. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Morey, C. R. 1953. Early Christian Art: An Outline of the Evolution of Style and Iconography in Sculpture and Painting from Antiquity to the Eighth Century, 2nd edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. 1992a. “Concepts of Abstraction in French Art Theory from the Enlightenment to Modernism.” JHistIdeas 53.4: 669–85.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. 1992b. “The Idea of Abstraction in German Theories of Ornament.” JAAC 50.3: 231–42.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. 1994. “The Rise and Fall of Abstraction in Eighteenth-Century Art Theory.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 27.3: 449–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D. 1996. “The Enchantment of Art: Abstraction and Empathy from German Romanticism to Expressionism.” JHistIdeas 57.2: 317–41.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. 1998. Literate Education in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. 2007. “Rhetoric and Education.” In A Companion to Greek Rhetoric, edited by Worthington, I., 303–19. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Müller-Wiener, W. 1977. Bildlexikon zur Topographie Istanbuls. Tübingen: Wasmuth.Google Scholar
Münz, E. 1888. “La colonne Théodosienne de Constantinople d’après les prétendus dessins de Gentile Bellini, conservés au Louvre et à l’Ecole de Beaux-Arts.” REG 1: 318–25.Google Scholar
Myres, J., and Pottle, M. 2004. “Dalton, Ormonde Maddock (1866–1945), Classical Scholar and Medieval Archaeologist.” In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, https://oxforddnb-com.proxyiub.uits.iu.edu/view/10.1093/ref:odnb/9780198614128.001.0001/odnb-9780198614128-e-32698.Google Scholar
Neer, R. 2010. The Emergence of Classical Style in Greek Sculpture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordström, C. 1953. Ravennastudien: Ideengeschichte und ikonographische Untersuchungen über die Mosaiken von Ravenna. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. 2009. The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberleitner, W. 1978. “Das Partherdenkmal.” In Funde aus Ephesos und Samothrake, Katalog der Antikensammlung, 2 vols., 2: 66–94. Vienna: Kunsthistorisches Museum Wien.Google Scholar
Olin, M. 1992. Forms of Representation in Alois Riegl’s Theory of Art. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Olin, M. 1994. “Alois Riegl: The Late Roman Empire in the Late Hapsburg Empire.” Austrian Studies 5: 107–20.Google Scholar
Olin, M. 2000. “Art History and Ideology: Alois Riegl and Joseph Strzygowski.” In Cultural Visions, edited by Schine Gold, P. and Sax, B. C., 151–70. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Olovsdotter, C. 2005. The Consular Image: An Iconological Study of the Consular Diptychs. Oxford: John and Erica Hedges, Ltd., BAR International Series 1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottenthal, E. von. 1904. Das K.K. Institut für Österreichische Geschichtsforschung 1854–1904. Festschrift zur Feier des fünfzigjährigen Bestandes. Vienna: Adolf Holzhausen.Google Scholar
Pächt, O. 1963. “Art Historians and Art Critics, IV: Alois Riegl.” BurlMag 105: 188–93.Google Scholar
Panegyrici Latini. 1994. In Praise of Later Roman Emperors: The Panegyrici Latini, edited by Nixon, C. E. V. and Saylor Rodgers, B.. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panofsky, E. 1955. “Charles Rufus Morey,” American Philosophical Society Yearbook, 482–91.Google Scholar
Parlasca, K., and Seemann, H., eds. 1999. Augenblicke: Mumienporträts und ägyptische Grabkunst aus römischer Zeit. Munich: Klinkhardt & Biermann.Google Scholar
Pausanias, . 1918–1935. Description of Greece, 4 vols. Translated by Jones, W. H. S.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, P. 1989. “The Arch of Constantine: Propaganda and Ideology in Late Antique Art.” AH 12: 387–418.Google Scholar
Pelosi, F. 2020. “Music and Emotions.” In A Companion to Ancient Greek and Roman Music, edited by Lynch, T. and Rocconi, E., 337–49. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Perry, E. 2005. The Aesthetics of Emulation in the Visual Arts of Ancient Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Philostratus, . 1931. Elder Philostratus, Imagines. Younger Philostratus Imagines. Callistratus Descriptions. Translated by Fairbanks, A.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Philostratus of Athens, . 2005. Life of Apollonius of Tyana, 2 vols. Translated by Jones, C. P.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Photius, Patriarch of Constantinople. 1958. Homilies of Photius, Patriarch of Constantinople, edited and translated by Mango, C.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Plato, . 2013. The Republic, 2 vols. Translated by Emlyn-Jones, C. and Preddy, W.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Plato, . 2022. Lysis. Symposium. Phaedrus. Edited and translated by Emlyn-Jones, C. and Preddy, W.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pliny the Elder, . 1938–1962. The Natural History, 10 vols. Translated by Rackham, H., Jones, W. H. S., and Eichholtz, D. E.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Plotinus, . 1969–1988. Enneads, 7 vols. Translated by Armstrong, A. H.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Plutarch, . 1927–1936. Moralia, 16 vols. Translated by Babbit, F. Cole. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Podro, M. 1982. The Critical Historians of Art. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J. 1974. The Ancient View of Greek Art. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J. 1995. “The Canon of Polykleitos and Other Canons.” In Polykleitos, the Doryphoros, and Tradition, edited by Moon, W., 19–24. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Potter, D. S. 2013. Constantine the Emperor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prange, R. 1994. “The Crystalline.” In The Romantic Spirit in German Art, 1790–1990, edited by Hertley, K., Meyric Hughes, H., Schuster, P. K. and Vaughn, W., 155–63. London: South Bank Centre.Google Scholar
Procopius of Gaza, . 1963. Procopii Gazaei Epistolae et Declamationes. Edited by Garzya, A. and Loenertz, R.. Ettal: Buch-Kunstverlag Ettal.Google Scholar
Quintilian, . 2002. The Orator’s Education, 5 vols. Edited and translated by Russell, D. A.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Radding, C. M., and Clark, W. W.. 1992. Medieval Architecture, Medieval Learning: Builders and Masters in the Age of Romanesque and Gothic. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rampley, M. 2009. “Art History and the Politics of Empire: Rethinking the Vienna School.” ArtB 91.4: 446–62.Google Scholar
Rampley, M. 2011. “The Idea of a Scientific Discipline: Rudolf von Eitelberger and the Emergence of Art History in Vienna, 1847–1873.” AH: 54–79.Google Scholar
Rampley, M. 2013. The Vienna School of Art History: Empire and the Politics of Scholarship, 1847–1918. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Rapp, C. 2005. Holy Bishops in Late Antiquity: The Nature of Christian Leadership in an Age of Transition. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinach, S. 1926. “Courrier de l’art antique.” GBA, anno 68.1: 175–191.Google Scholar
Richter, J. P. 1878. Die Mosaiken von Ravenna. Vienna: W. Braumüller.Google Scholar
Richter, J. P., and Cameron Taylor, A.. 1904. The Golden Age of Classic Christian Art. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Riegl, A. 1891. Alt Orientalische Teppiche. Leipzig: T. O. Weigel.Google Scholar
Riegl, A. 1893. Stilfragen. Grundlegungen zu einer Geschichte der Ornamentik. Berlin: Siemens.Google Scholar
Riegl, A. 1901. Die spätrömische Kunst-Industrie nach den Funden in Österreich-Ungarn. Vienna: Druck und Verlag der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Hof- und Staatsdruckerei.Google Scholar
Riegl, A. 1902. “Spätrömische oder orientalisch?” Münchner Allgemeine Zeitung. Beilag 93–94 (23–24 April): 133–156 and 162–165. Translated by P. Wortsman as “Late Roman or Oriental?” in German Essays on Art History, edited by G. Schiff, 173–90. New York: Continuum, 1988.Google Scholar
Riegl, A. 1923. Stilfragen. Grundlegungen zu einer Geschichte der Ornamentik. Berlin: Carl Schmidt.Google Scholar
Riegl, A. 1927. Die spätrömische Kunstindustrie. Vienna: Österreichisches Staatsdruckerei.Google Scholar
Riegl, A. 1966. Historische Grammatik der bildenden Künste. Edited by Swoboda, K. M. and Pächt, O.. Graz: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Riegl, A. 1985. The Late Roman Art-Industry. Translated by Winkes, R.. Rome: Giorgio Bretschneider, 1985.Google Scholar
Riegl, A. 2004. Historical Grammar of the Visual Arts. Translated by Jung, J.. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Riesman, D. 1950. The Lonely Crowd: A Study of the Changing American Character. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ringbom, S. 1966. “Art in the ‘Epoch of the Great Spiritual’: Occult Elements in the Early Theory of Abstract Painting.” JWarb 29: 384–418.Google Scholar
Ringbom, S. 1970. The Sounding Cosmos: A Study in the Spiritualism of Kandinsky and the Genesis of Abstract Painting. Åbo: Åbo Akademi.Google Scholar
Ringbom, S. 1986. “Transcending the Visible: The Generation of Abstract Pioneers.” In The Spiritual in Art: Abstract Painting 1890–1985, edited by Tuchman, M. and Freedman, J., 131–53. New York: Abbeville Press.Google Scholar
Rizzardi, C. 1988. “Paradigmi ideologici ed estetici nei mosaici ravennati di età giustinianea.” FR, 4a ser. 39: 37–61.Google Scholar
Rizzardi, C. 2005. “I mosaici parietali di Ravenna da Galla Placidia a Giustiniano.” In Venezia e Bisanzio. Aspetti della cultura artistica bizantina da Ravenna a Venezia (V – XIV secolo), edited by Rizzardi, C., 231–74. Venice: Istituto veneto di scienze, lettere ed arti.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. 1989. The Jeweled Style: Poetry and Poetics in Late Antiquity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rodenwaldt, G. 1921–1922. “Eine spätantike Kunstströmung in Rom.” RM 36.37: 58–110.Google Scholar
Rodenwaldt, G. 1928. “Ara Pacis und San Vitale.” BJb 133: 228–35.Google Scholar
Rodenwaldt, G. 1931. “Das Problem der Renaissancen.” AA: 318–38.Google Scholar
Rodenwaldt, G. 1939. “The Transition to Late-Classical Art.” In Cambridge Ancient History 12: Imperial Crisis and Recovery, AD 193–324, edited by Cook, S. A., Adcock, F. E., Charlesworth, M. P., and Baynes, N. H., 544–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodenwaldt, G. 1944–1945a. “Bermerkungen zu den Kaisermosaiken in San Vitale.” JdI 59.60: 88–110.Google Scholar
Rodenwaldt, G. 1944–1945b. “Zur Begrenzung und Gliederung der Spätantike.” JdI 59–60: 81–87.Google Scholar
Rose, C. B. 2021. “Reconsidering the Frieze on the Arch of Constantine.” JRA 34: 175–210.Google Scholar
Rossi, G. B. De. 1864–1877. Roma sotterranea cristiana, 3 vols. Rome: Cromo-litografia pontificia.Google Scholar
Rothe, U. 2020. The Toga and Roman Identity. London: Bloomsbury Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roueché, C. 1989. Aphrodisias in Late Antiquity: The Late Roman and Byzantine Inscriptions Including Texts from the Excavations at Aphrodisias Conducted by Kenan T. Erim. London: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies.Google Scholar
Rousseau, P. 1971. “The Spiritual Authority of the ‘Monk-Bishop’: Eastern Elements in Some Western Hagiography of the Fourth and Fifth Century.” JThS n.s. 22: 380–419.Google Scholar
Rousseau, P. 2010. Ascetics, Authority and the Church in the Age of Jerome and Cassian, 2nd ed. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouselle, A. 2001. “Images as Education in the Roman Empire, 2nd–3rd c. CE.” In Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity, edited by Too, Yun Lee, 373–402. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumpf, A. 1955. “Stilphasen der spätantiken Kunst.” Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Forschung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen: Geisteswissenschaften, Abhandlung 44: 5–44.Google Scholar
Rumpler, H. 1997. Eine Chance für Mitteleuropa. Bürgerliche Emanzipation und Staatsverfall in der Habsburgermonarchie. Vienna: Ueberreuter Sachbuch.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. 1981. Criticism in Antiquity. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Sandberg, M. 2015. “‘Obsidio Veronae’ und ‘proelium apud Tiberim’: Zum Selbstverständnis des spätantiken Kaisertums anhand der Schlachtenfriese des Arcus Constantini.” Potestas 8: 105–47.Google Scholar
Sande, S. 1981. “Some New Fragments from the Column of Theodosius.” ActaIRNorv, ser. altera 1: 1–78.Google Scholar
Sauerländer, W. 1983. “From Stylus to Style: Reflections on the Fate of a Notion.” AH 6: 253–70.Google Scholar
Schapiro, M. 1953. “Style.” In Anthropology Today: An Encyclopedic Inventory, edited by Kroeber, A. L., 287–312. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Republished in Aesthetics Today, edited by M. Philipson, 81–113. Cleveland: World Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Schede, M. 1920. “Archäologische Funde, Türkei.” JdI 44: 325–68.Google Scholar
Schede, M. 1929. “Archäologische Funde, Türkei.” AA: 340–42.Google Scholar
Schiff, G. 1988. German Essays on Art History. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Schmarsow, A. 1905. Grundbegriffe der Kunstwissenschaft. Leipzig: Gebr. Mann.Google Scholar
Schnaase, C. 1842–1879. Geschichte der bildenden Künste im Mittelalter, vol. 3. Düsseldorf: Julius Buddeus.Google Scholar
Schneider, A. M. 1944–1945. “Fund- und Forschungsbericht Türkei 1943.” AA 1944.45: 71–81.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, A. 1948. The World as Will and Idea/Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung, 3 vols. Translated by Haldane, R. B. and Kemp, J.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Schorske, C. 2006. “Gustav Klimt’s Faculty Paintings and the Crisis of the Liberal Ego.” In Gustav Klimt: The Beethoven Frieze and the Controversy over the Freedom of Art, edited by Koja, Stephen, 13–26. Munich: Prestel.Google Scholar
Schueller, H. M. 1988. The Idea of Music: An Introduction to Musical Aesthetics in Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University.Google Scholar
Schwarzer, M. 1995. “Origins of the Art History Survey Text.” Art Journal 54: 24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seaman, K. 2017. “The Social and Educational Background of Elite Greek Artists.” In Artists and Artistic Production in Ancient Greece, edited by Seaman, K. and Schultz, P., 12–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seaman, K. 2020. Rhetoric and Innovation in Hellenistic Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, E. 2017. “Under Miss Green’s Watch: Three Decades of Art History at the Index of Christian Art.” In Tributes to Adelaide Bennett Hagens: Manuscripts, Iconography, and the Late Medieval Viewer, edited by Patton, P. A. and Golden, J. K., 15–37. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Sears, E. 2022. “Iconography and Iconology at Princeton.” In Iconography beyond the Crossroads: Image, Meaning, and Method in Medieval Art, edited by Patton, P. A. and Fernandez, C. A., 9–34. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Seroux D’Agincourt, J. B. L. G. 1823. Histoire de l’art par les monuments depuis sa décadence au IVe siècle jusqu’au son renouvellement au XVI, 6 vols. Paris: Treuttel & Würtz.Google Scholar
Sheldrake, P. 2012. Spirituality: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldrake, P. 2013. Spirituality: A Brief History. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sieger, J. D. 1987. “Visual Metaphor as Theology: Leo the Great’s Sermons on the Incarnation and the Arch Mosaics at S. Maria Maggiore.” Gesta 26.2: 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siepel, W., ed. 2006. Das Partherdenkmal von Ephesos. Akten des Kolloquiums Wien, 27.–28. April 2003. Vienna: Kunsthistorisches Museum, and Milan: Skira.Google Scholar
Simpson, K. 2010. “Viennese Art, Ugliness and the Vienna School of Art History: The Vicissitudes of Theory and Practice.” JArtHist 3: 1–14.Google Scholar
Simpson, O. von. 1948. Sacred Fortress: Byzantine Art and Statecraft in Ravenna. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R. 1990. “Late Roman Philosopher Portraits from Aphrodisias.” JRS 80: 125–55.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R. 1997. “The Public Image of Licinius I: Portrait Sculpture and Imperial Ideology in the Early Fourth Century.” JRS 87: 170–202.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R. 1999. “Late Antique Portraits in a Public Context: Honorific Statuary at Aphrodisias in Caria, AD 300–600.” JRS 89: 155–89.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R. 2002. “The Statue Monument of Oecumenius: A New Portrait of a Late Antique Governor from Aphrodisias.” JRS 92: 134–56.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R. 2007. “Statue Life in the Hadrianic Baths at Aphrodisias, AD 100–600: Local Context and Historical Meaning.” In Statuen und Statuensammlungen in der Spätantike – Funktion und Kontext (Spätantike, Frühes Christentum, Byzanz: Kunst im ersten Jahrtausend), edited by Bauer, F. A. and Witschel, C., 203–35. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R., and Ward-Perkins, B., eds. 2016. The Last Statues of Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smythe, C. H. 1993. “Concerning Charles Rufus Morey.” In The Early Years of Art History in the United States, edited by Smythe, C. H. and Lukehart, P. M., 111–21. Princeton, NJ: Department of Art and Archaeology.Google Scholar
Sorensen, L., ed. 2022a. “Morey, Charles Rufus.” In Dictionary of Art Historians, https://arthistorians.info/moreyc.Google Scholar
Sorensen, L., 2022b. “Schmarsow, August.” In Dictionary of Art Historians, https://arthistorians.info/schmarsowa.Google Scholar
Sorensen, L., 2022c. “Strzygowski, Josef Rudolf Thomas.” In Dictionary of Art Historians, https://arthistorians.info/strzygowski.Google Scholar
Spain, S. 1977. “Carolingian Restorations of S. Maria Maggiore in Rome.” Gesta 16: 13–22.Google Scholar
Spain, S. 1979. “‘The Promised Blessing’: The Iconography of the Mosaics of S. Maria Maggiore.” ArtB 61.4: 518–40.Google Scholar
Spain, S. 1983. “Restorations of the Sta. Maria Maggiore Mosaics.” ArtB 65.2: 325–28.Google Scholar
Steigerwald, G. 2000. “Zur Darstellung Jesus im Tempel an Triumphbogen von S. Maria Maggiore in Rome (432–440).” JbAC 43:187–99.Google Scholar
Steigerwald, G. 2007. “Neue Aspekte zum Verständnis der Mosaiken des Triumphbogen von S. Maria Maggiore in Rom.” RQ 102: 161–203.Google Scholar
Steigerwald, G. 2010. “Die Rolle Mariens in den Triumphbogen Mosaiken und in der Weihenschrift der Basilika S. Maria Maggiore in Rom.” JbAC 51: 137–51.Google Scholar
Steinby, E. M., ed. 1993–2000. Lexicon topographicum urbis Romae, 5 vols. Rome: Quasar.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. 1978. “The Canon of Polykleitos: A Question of Evidence.” JHS 98: 122–31.Google Scholar
Stewart, C. 2005. “Christian Spirituality during the Roman Empire 100–600.” In Blackwell Companion to Christian Spirituality, edited by Holder, A. G., 73–89. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stričević, G. 1959. “Iconografia dei mosaici imperiali a S. Vitale.” FR 80: 5–27.Google Scholar
Stričević, G. 1962. “Sur le problème de l’iconographie des mosaïques impériales de Saint- Vital.” FR 85: 80–100.Google Scholar
Strong, E. S. 1907. Roman Sculpture from Augustus to Constantine. London: Duckworth, and New York: C. Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Strzygowski, J. 1893. “Die Säule des Arcadius.” JdI 8: 230–49.Google Scholar
Strzygowski, J. 1901. Orient oder Rom. Beiträge zur Geschichte der spätantiken und frühchristlichen Kunst. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs‘sche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Strzygowski, J. 1902a. “Alois Riegl, Die spätrömische Kunst-Industrie nach den Fundenin Österreich–Ungarn, in Zusammenhange mit der Gesamtentwicklung der bildenden Künste bei den Mittelmeervölkern dargestellt.” ByzZeit 11: 263–66.Google Scholar
Strzygowski, J. 1902b. “Hellas in des Orients Umarmung.” Beilage zur Allgemeinen Zeitung 18 and 19 February: 313–17 and 325–27; reprinted as Sonderabdruck.Google Scholar
Strzygowski, J. 1904. Koptische Kunst. Vienna: A Holzhausen.Google Scholar
Strzygowski, J. 1936. Aufgang des Norden. Lebenskampf eines Kunstforschers um ein deutsches Weltbild. Leipzig: Schwarzhäupter Verlag.Google Scholar
Stuhlfauth, G. 1901. “Strzygowski, Josef, Orient oder Rom.” ThLz 26.25 (7 December): 657–60.Google Scholar
Stylow, A. 1972. “Libertas und Liberalitas. Untersuchungen zur innenpolitischen Propaganda der Römer,” Ph.D. dissertation, Munich.Google Scholar
Summers, D. 1977. “Contrapposto: Style and Meaning in Renaissance Art.” ArtB 59.3: 336–61.Google Scholar
Summers, D. 1989. “Form, 19th-Century Metaphysics and the Problem of Art Historical Description.” CI 15: 372–406.Google Scholar
Swain, S., ed. 2007. Seeing the Face, Seeing the Soul: Polemon’s Physiognomy from Classical Antiquity to Medieval Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Szemethy, H. 2014. “Archaeology and Cultural Politics: Ottoman-Austrian Relations.” In Scramble for the Past: A Story of Archaeology in the Ottoman Empire, 1753–1914, edited by Bahrani, Z., Çelik, Z., and Eldem, E., 331–75. Istanbul: SALT/Garanti Kültür.Google Scholar
Taine, H. 1874. Voyage en Italie, 2 vols. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Taroutina, M. 2021. “From First Rome to Third Rome: Nikodim Kondakov and Late Antique Studies,” in The New Late Antiquity: A Gallery of Intellectual Portraits, edited by Ando, C. and Formisano, M., 595–608. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Tobin, R. 1975. “The Canon of Polykleitos.” AJA 79.4: 307–21.Google Scholar
Torelli, M., 1982. Typology and Structure of Roman Historical Reliefs. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Touchette, L. A. 2015. “Archaism and Eclecticism,” in The Oxford Handbook of Roman Sculpture, edited by Friedland, E. A., Sobocinski, M. G., and Gazda, E. K., 292–306. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Toynbee, J. M. C. 1964. Art in Britain under the Romans. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Toynbee, J. M. C., and Painter, K. S.. 1986. “The Silver Picture Plates of Late Antiquity, AD 300–700.” Archaeologia 108: 15–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tronzo, W. 2001. “The Shape of Narrative: A Problem in the Mural Decoration of Early Medieval Rome.” In Roma nel alto medioevo, 27 aprile–1 maggio 2000. Settimane di studio del Centro italiano di studi sull’alto medioevo, 2 vols., 1: 457–87. Spoleto: Centro italiano di studi sull’alto medioevo.Google Scholar
Tuchman, M., 1986. “The Hidden Meaning in Abstract Art.” In The Spiritual in Art: Abstract Painting 1890–1985, edited by Tuchman, M. and Freedman, J., 17–61. New York: Abbeville Press.Google Scholar
Tuchman, M., and Freedman, J., eds. 1986. The Spiritual in Art: Abstract Painting 1890–1985. New York: Abbeville Press.Google Scholar
Van Eyck, C., McAllister, J., and Van de Vall, R., eds. 1995. The Question of Style in Philosophy and the Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Varnedoe, K. 1990. A Fine Disregard: What Makes Modern Art Modern. New York: Abrams.Google Scholar
Vasari, G. 1998. Le opera di Giorgio Vasari con nuove annotazione e commenti, 9 vols. Edited by Milanesi, G.. Florence: Le Lettere.Google Scholar
Vergo, P. 2015. Art in Vienna, 1898–1918: Klimt, Kokoschka, Schiele and Their Contemporaries, 4th ed. London: Phaidon Press.Google Scholar
Vermeule, C. 1968. Roman Imperial Art in Greece and Asia Minor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viollet-le-Duc, E. E. 1854–1868. Dictionnaire raisonné de l’architecture française du XI au XVI siècle, 10 vols. Paris: Morel.Google Scholar
Vischer, R. 1994. “On the Optical Sense of Form: A Contribution to Aesthetics.” In Empathy, Form and Space: Problems in German Aesthetics, 1873–1893, edited and translated by Mallgrave, H. and Ikonomou, E., 17–29. Originally published as Über das optische Formgefühl: Ein Beitrag zur Aesthetik. Leipzig: Hermann Credner, 1873.Google Scholar
Visconti, Cav. P. E., ed. 1834. Lettera sulle antichitá di Roma scritta da Raffaello d’Urbino a Papa Leone X. Rome: Giuseppe Brancadoro e Comp.Google Scholar
Wace, A. J. B. 1907. “Studies in Roman Historical Reliefs.” PBSR 4: 229–76.Google Scholar
Waite, G. C. W. 1995. “Worringer’s Abstraction and Empathy: Remarks on Its Reception and on the Rhetoric of Its Criticism.” In Invisible Cathedrals: The Expressionist Art History of Wilhelm Worringer, edited by Donohue, N. H., 13–40. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, J. 2000. Rhetoric and Poetics in Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walz, R. 2008. Modernism. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Watson, G. 1972. “The Concept of Phantasia from the Late Hellenistic Period to Early Neo-Platonism.” ANRW, II 36.7: 4765–810.Google Scholar
Watson, G. 1988. Phantasia in Classical Thought. Galway: Galway University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, E. J. 2006. City and School in Late Antique Athens and Alexandria. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Webb, R. 1999. “Aesthetics of Sacred Space: Narrative, Metaphor, and Motion in ‘Ekphraseis’ of Church Buildings.” DOP 53: 59–74.Google Scholar
Webb, R. 2000. “Ekphrasis, Amplification, and Persuasion in Procopios’ ‘Buildings’,” AntTard 8: 67–71.Google Scholar
Webb, R. 2001. “The Progymnasmata as Practice.” In Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity, edited by Too, Yun Lee, 289–316. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, R. 2006. “The ‘Imagines’ as a Fictional Text: ‘Ekphrasis,’ ‘Apate,’ and Illusion. In Le défi de l’art: Philostrate, Callistrate, et l’image sophistique, edited by Graziani, F., Costantini, M., and Rolet, S., 113–36. Rennes: Presse Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Webb, R. 2009. Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Weitzmann, K. 1976. The Monastery of Saint Catherine at Mount Sinai: The Icons, vol. 1. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weitzmann, K., ed. 1979. Age of Spirituality: Late Antique and Early Christian Art, Third through Seventh Centuries. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art and Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wickhoff, F. 1900. Roman Art. Translated by Mrs. Strong, S. Arthur. London: Heinemann, and New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wickhoff, F. 1912. Römische Kunst: die Wiener Genesis. Berlin: Meyer and Jessen.Google Scholar
Wickhoff, F. 1913. Abhandlungen, Vorträge und Anzeigen. Edited by Dvořák, M.. Berlin: Meyer & Jessen.Google Scholar
Wickhoff, F., and Ritter von Hartel, W.. 1895. Die Wiener Genesis, 2 vols. Vienna: F. Tempsky.Google Scholar
Wilpert, J. 1916. Die römische Mosaiken und Malereien der kirchlichen Bauten vom IV.bis XIII. Jahrhundert, 4 vols. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder.Google Scholar
Wölfflin, H. 1886. “Prolegomena zu einer Psychologie der Architektur: Inaugural- Dissertation der hohen philosophischen Fakultät der Universität München zur Erlangung der höchsten akademischen Würde. Munich: Kgl. & Universitäts–Buchdrukerei von Dr. C. Wolf & Sohn.Google Scholar
Wölfflin, H. 1915. Kunstgeschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Munich: Bruckmann.Google Scholar
Woodruff, P. 2015. “Mimesis.” In A Companion to Ancient Aesthetics, edited by Destrée, P. and Murray, P., 329–40. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Worringer, W. 1907. Abstraktion und Einfühlung. Ein Beitrag zur Stilpsychologie. Neuwied: Heuser.Google Scholar
Worringer, W. 1908. Abstraktion und Einfühlung. Ein Beitrag zur Stilpsychologie. Munich: R. Piper.Google Scholar
Worringer, W. 1916. Abstraktion und Einfühlung. Ein Beitrag zur Stilpsychologie. Munich: R. Piper.Google Scholar
Worringer, W. 1953. Abstraction and Empathy: A Contribution to the Psychology of Style. Translated by Bullock, M.. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Worringer, W. 1997. Abstraction and Empathy: A Contribution to the Psychology of Style. Translated by Bullock, M.. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee Publishers.Google Scholar
Wulff, O. 1903. “D. Ainalov, Die Hellenistischen Grundlagen der byzantinische Kunst.” RepKunstw 26: 35–55.Google Scholar
Wulff, O. 1914. Altchristliche und byzantinische Kunst, 2 vols. Berlin-Neubabelsberg: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Athenaion.Google Scholar
Zäh, A. 2012. “Josef Strzygowski als Initiator der christlich-kunsthistorischen Orientforschung und Visionär der Kunstwissenschaft.” RQ 107: 249–92.Google Scholar
Zaloscher, H. 1974. Die Kunst in christlichen Ägypten. Vienna: A. Schroll.Google Scholar
Zaloziecky, W. R. 1947. “Oskar Wulff (1864–1946).” ZSlPh 19.2: 249–65.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. 1995. The Mask of Socrates: The Image of the Intellectual in Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zibawi, M. 2003. Images de l’Égypte chrétienne: Iconologie copte. Milan: Jaca Books, and Paris: Picard.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, B. 2003. Die Wiener Genesis im Rahmen der antiken Buchmalerei. Wiesbaden: Reichert.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Sarah Bassett, Indiana University, Bloomington
  • Book: Style and Meaning in Late Antique Art
  • Online publication: 15 August 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009466356.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Sarah Bassett, Indiana University, Bloomington
  • Book: Style and Meaning in Late Antique Art
  • Online publication: 15 August 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009466356.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Sarah Bassett, Indiana University, Bloomington
  • Book: Style and Meaning in Late Antique Art
  • Online publication: 15 August 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009466356.013
Available formats
×