Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface and acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Word order and clause structure
- 3 Order of elements within the phrase
- 4 Case, agreement, grammatical relations and thematic roles
- 5 Passives, middles and unaccusatives
- 6 Different types of expletive constructions
- 7 Fronting, focusing, extraposition and NP-shift
- 8 Finite and non-finite complements and adjuncts
- 9 Pronouns, reflexives and empty categories
- References
- Index of subjects
- Index of languages and dialects
- Index of names
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 January 2010
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface and acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Word order and clause structure
- 3 Order of elements within the phrase
- 4 Case, agreement, grammatical relations and thematic roles
- 5 Passives, middles and unaccusatives
- 6 Different types of expletive constructions
- 7 Fronting, focusing, extraposition and NP-shift
- 8 Finite and non-finite complements and adjuncts
- 9 Pronouns, reflexives and empty categories
- References
- Index of subjects
- Index of languages and dialects
- Index of names
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Syntax of Icelandic , pp. 505 - 529Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007
References
Abney, Peter S. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
1985. Norwegian Verb-Particle Constructions as Causative Constructions. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8: 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Adverb Placement: A Case Study in Antisymmetric Syntax. Linguistics Today 18. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Cynthia L. 1996. A Change in Structural Case Marking in Early Middle English. In , and (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax 2, pp. 3–20. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 38. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1986. The Typology of Anaphoric Dependencies: Icelandic (and Other) Reflexives. In and (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 65–88. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.1990. The Grammar of Icelandic Verbs in -st. In and (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 235–73. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.2002. Syntax and Morphology are Different: Commentary on Jonas. In (ed.): Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, pp. 271–5. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1971. Case Agreement of Predicate Modifiers in Ancient Greek. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 127–51.Google Scholar
1976. The VP Complement Analysis in Modern Icelandic. NELS 6: 1–21. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 165–85. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar
Andrews, Avery D.1982a. The Representation of Case in Modern Icelandic. In (ed.): The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, pp. 427–503. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Andrews, Avery D.1982b. Long Distance Agreement in Modern Icelandic. In and (eds.): The Nature of Syntactic Representation, pp. 1–33. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Avery D.1990. Case Structures and Control. In and (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 187–234. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Angantýsson, Ásgrímur, see Ásgrímur Angantýsson
Anward, Jan. 1974. Swedish Reflexivization. In Papers from the First Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 17–35. Department of Linguistics, University of Göteborg.
Árnason, Kristján, see Kristján Árnason.
Arnbjörnsdóttir, Birna, see Birna Arnbjörnsdóttir.
. 1982. Þágufallssýki. Breytingar á fallnotkun í frumlagssæti ópersónulegra setninga. Íslenskt mál 4: 19–62.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1997. Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure. In (ed.): Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax, pp. 73–137. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, see Jóhanna Barðdal.
1986a. Subject, Nominative and Oblique Case in Faroese. Scripta Islandica 37: 13–46. [Also in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar
1986b. Reflexivisation in Faroese: A Preliminary Survey. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 101: 95–126. [Also in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar
1986–1987. The Faroese Auxiliary Verb munna. Fróðskaparrit 34–35: 42–49. [Also in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar
1987. Some Remarks on Subordinate Clause Word Order in Faroese. Scripta Islandica 38: 3–85. [Also in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael P.1992. Faroese Syntax – Achievements, Goals and Problems. In and (eds.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 7, pp. 17–37. Føroya Fróðskaparfelag, Tórshavn. [Also in Scripta Islandica 43: 28–43 and in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael P.2002. Head + Modifier or Modifier + Head? In , , and (eds.): Eivindarmál: Heiðursrit til Eivind Weyhe á seksti ára degi hansara 25. April 2002, pp. 59–66. Føroya Fróðskaparfelag, Tórshavn.Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael P., and Eivind Weyhe. 1994. Faroese. In and (eds.): The Germanic Languages, pp. 190–89. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
. 2003. V-to-I Movement in the Absence of Morphological Cues: Evidence from Northern Norwegian. In Papers from the 19th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 573–88. Nordlyd 31. University of Tromsø, Tromsø.Google Scholar
Bergsveinsson, Sveinn, see Sveinn Bergsveinsson.
Bernódusson, Helgi, see Helgi Bernódusson.
Bernstein, Judy B. 2001. The DP Hypothesis: Identifying Clausal Properties in the Nominal Domain. In and (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 536–61. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessason, Haraldur, see Haraldur Bessason.
den Besten, Hans. 1983. On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules. In (ed.): On the Formal Syntax of Westgermania, pp. 47–131. John Benjamins, Amsterdam [First distributed in manuscript form in 1977.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birna Arnbjörnsdóttir. 1990. North American Icelandic: The Linguistic and Social Context of Vowel Mergers. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin. [Available from University of Michigan Dissertation Services since 1995.]
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 1994. What Does Adjacency Do? In and (eds.): The Morphology-Syntax Connection, pp. 1–32. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Department of Linguistics, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David.1995. Morphosyntax: The Syntax of Verbal Inflection. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David.2000. Adjacency and Autonomy: Holmberg's Generalization Revisited. In (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 10, pp. 51–59. Institute of Linguistics, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
. 2002. Realizing Germanic Inflection: Why Morphology Does not Drive Syntax. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 6: 129–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2001. PF Merger in Scandinavian: Stylistic Fronting and Object Shift. WPSS 68: 75–115.Google Scholar
. 2005. On the Locality of the Left Branch Extraction and the Structure of NP. Studia Linguistica 59: 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Die skandinavischen Sprachen im Überblick. Francke Verlag, Tübingen. [2nd revised edition 1999.]Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, and Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1990. A Note on Icelandic Coordination. In and (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 355–65. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi. 1981. Intransitive Verbs and Italian Auxiliaries. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. [Revised edition published as Italian Syntax by Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986.]
. 1991. The Morphological Basis of Anaphora. Journal of Linguistics 27: 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam.1991. Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation. In (ed.): Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, pp. 417–54. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam.1993. A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. In and (eds.): The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, pp. 1–52. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
. 1998. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 15. Department of Linguistics, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
. 1999. Derivation by Phase. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18. Department of Linguistics, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
. 2003. On the Synchronic and Diachronic Status of the Negative Adverbial ikke/not. WPSS 72: 1–53.Google Scholar
Christensen, Ken Ramshøj.2005. Interfaces: Negation – Syntax – Brain. Doctoral dissertation, University of Aarhus.
. 1983. The Categorial Status of Norwegian Infinitival Relatives. In Papers from the 7th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 9–20. Department of Linguistics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Christensen, Kirsti Koch.1986. Norwegian ingen: A Case of Post-syntactic Lexicalization. In and (eds.): Scandinavian Syntax: Papers from a Workshop at the 9th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 21–35. Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.Google Scholar
. 1991a. AGR, Adjunction, and the Structure of Scandinavian Existential Sentences. Lingua 84: 137–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1991b. Skandinaviske presenteringssetninger i GB-teoretisk perspektiv. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 9: 21–49.Google Scholar
Christensen, Kirsti Koch, and Knut Tarald Taraldsen. 1989. Expletive Chain Formation and Past Participle Agreement in Scandinavian Dialects. In (ed.): Dialect Variation and the Theory of Grammar, pp. 53–83. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
. 1995. Adverbs and the Universal Hierarchy of Functional Projections. GLOW Newsletter 34: 14–15.Google Scholar
. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Crosslinguistic Perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
. 1986. English Influence on American German and American Icelandic. Peter Lang, Bern.Google Scholar
1975. The Logophoric Pronoun in Ewe: Its Role in Discourse. Journal of West African Languages 10: 141–77.Google Scholar
, and (eds.). 2001. Long Distance Reflexives. Syntax and Semantics 33. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
, and . 1996. VP-Internal Structure and Object Shift in Icelandic. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 391–444.Google Scholar
. 1990. Tense and Mood in English: A Comparison with Danish. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2004. On the Order of Objects in Icelandic Double Object Constructions. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 85–108.Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1993a. The Internal Structure of Noun Phrases in the Scandinavian Languages. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.
. 1993b. On Attributive Adjectives in Scandinavian and Other Languages. Studia Linguistica 47: 105–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Prepositionsstrandning och kasus i äldre svenska. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 110: 141–78.Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof.1998. Possession in Germanic. In and (eds.): Possessor, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase, pp. 87–108. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof.2003a. Syntaktisk variation i nordiska nominalfraser. In , and (eds.): Dialektsyntaktiska studier av den nordiska nominalfrasen, pp. 11–64. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof.2003b. Preposition Stranding and Case. In , , and (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 75–84. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
Déprez, Viviane. 1989. On the Typology of Syntactic Positions and the Nature of Chains. Move α to the Specifier of Functional Projections. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Diesing, Molly.1996. Semantic Variables and Object Shift. In , and (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax II, pp. 66–84. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Yiddish VP Order and the Typology of Object Movement in Germanic. NLLT 15: 369–427.Google Scholar
Einarsson, Stefán, see Stefán Einarsson.
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson. 1982a: Um orðaröð og færslur í íslensku. MA thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
. 1982b. We Need (Some Kind of) a Rule of Conjunction Reduction. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 557–61. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 349–53. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.1984a. Rightward displacements of NPs in Icelandic. In and (eds.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 5, pp. 362–8. University of Aarhus, Aarhus.Google Scholar
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.1986. Some Comments on Reflexivization in Icelandic. In and (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 89–102. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.1987b. OV Order in Icelandic. In and (eds.): Proceedings of the Seventh Biennial Conference of Teachers of Scandinavian Languages in Great Britain and Northern Ireland, pp. 33–49. Department of Scandinavian, University College, London.Google Scholar
. 1990a. Um orðaröð og færslur í íslensku. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík. [The author's 1982 MA-thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.]Google Scholar
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.1990b. Null objects in Icelandic. In and (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 367–79. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
. 1991. Quirky Subjects in Old Icelandic. Papers from the Twelfth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 369–378. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
1996b. Mikið er það sorglegt að refir skuli ekki geta klifrað í trjám. Höskollu gefið, pp. 14–16. A festschrift for Höskuldur Thráinsson. University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.2005. Setningafræðilegar breytingar í íslensku. In : Setningar, pp. 602–35. Almenna bókafélagið, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson and Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1990. On Icelandic Word Order Once More. In and (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 3–40. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin.2002b. The EPP in a Topic-Prominent Language. In (ed.): Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, pp. 107–24. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Engdahl, Elisabet. 1999. The Choice between bli-Passive and -s-Passive in Danish, Norwegian and Swedish. Ms., University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.
Erteschik, Nomi. 1973. On the Nature of Island Constraints. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Everaert, Martin.1991. Nominative Anaphors in Icelandic: Morphology or Syntax? In , and (eds.): Issues in Germanic Syntax, pp. 277–305. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
Everaert, Martin.2001. Paradigmatic Restrictions on Anaphors. In and (eds.): West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 20: 178–91. Cascadilla Press, Somerville, Mass.Google Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur, see Thórhallur Eythórsson.
Faarlund, Jan Terje. 1977. Transformational Syntax in Dialectology: Scandinavian Word Order Varieties. In and (eds.): Papers from the Trondheim Syntax Symposium, pp. 65–83. University of Trondheim, Trondheim.Google Scholar
. 1990. Syntactic Change: Toward a Theory of Historical Syntax. Mouton, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2004. The Syntax of Old Norse: With a Survey of the Inflectional Morphology and a Complete Bibliography. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Falk, Cecilia.1993. Non-Referential Subjects in the History of Swedish. Doctoral dissertation, Lund University, Lund.
Ferguson, K. Scott. 1996. Shortest Move and Object Case Checking. In , , and (eds.): Minimal Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework, pp. 97–111. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The Case for Case. In and (eds.): Universals in Linguistic Theory, pp. 1–88. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
1971. Some Problems for Case Grammar. Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 245–65. Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
Friðjónsson, Jón G., see Jón G. Friðjónsson.
Friðrik Magnússon.1990. Kjarnafærsla og það-innskot í aukasetningum í íslensku. Málvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands, Reykjavík. [The author's 1989 Master's thesis.]
Gärtner, Hans-Martin. 2003. How Icelandic Can you be if you Speak Icelandic B? In , , and (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 115–22. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
. 1984. Towards a Theory of Long Distance Anaphors: A GB Approach. The Linguistic Review 3: 307–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra.1991. Prepositions, Binding and θ-Marking. In and (eds.): Long-Distance Anaphora, pp. 185–208. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guðmundsson, Helgi, see Helgi Guðmundsson.
. 2001. An Optimality Theory Analysis of Agreement in Icelandic DAT-NOM Constructions. WPSS 68: 15–47.Google Scholar
Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson.2004b. Oblique Subjects and Stylistic Fronting in the History of Scandinavian and English: The Role of IP-Spec. Doctoral dissertation, University of Aarhus, Aarhus.
Gylfi Hafsteinsson. 1998. Um hömlur á röð íslenskra lýsingarorða – og samanburður við önnur tungumál. BA thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Hafsteinsson, Gylfi, see Gylfi Hafsteinsson.
Haider, Hubert. 1997. Extraposition. In , and (eds.): Rightward Movement, pp. 115–51. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert, Susan Olsen and Sten Vikner. 1995. Introduction. In , and (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, I, pp. 1–45. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.). 1986. Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages. Foris, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1982. Um méranir. Drög að samtímalegri og sögulegri athugun. Íslenskt mál 4: 159–89.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1983. Um frásagnarumröðun og grundvallarorðaröð í forníslensku. Master's thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1986. Verb Post-Second in a V2 Language. In and (eds.): Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 138–49. Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1989. Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Lund, Lund. [Reprinted by the Linguistic Institute at the University of Iceland 1992.]
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1990a. V1 Declaratives and Verb Raising in Icelandic. In and (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 41–69. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1990b. Long Distance Reflexives and Moods in Icelandic. In and (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 309–46. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
. 1990c. Icelandic Case Marked PRO and the Licensing of Lexical A-positions. WPSS 45: 35–82.Google Scholar
. 1991. Icelandic Case-Marked PRO and the Licensing of Lexical Arguments. NLLT 9: 327–63.Google Scholar
. 1993b. Agreement as Head Visible Feature Government. Studia Linguistica 47: 32–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1994. Morphological Case, Abstract Case and Licensing. In and (eds.): Proceedings of the 14th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics – Special Session on Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 145–59. Department of Linguistics, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1997. Öðruvísi frumlög. In , and (eds.): Milli himins og jarðar, pp. 299–306. Háskólaútgáfan, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.2001. Inflectional Features and Clausal Structure. In and (eds.): Nordic and Baltic Morphology, pp. 99–111. Studies in Languages 36, University of Joensuu, Joensuu.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.2003. Case: Abstract vs. Morphological. In and (eds.): New Perspectives on Case Theory, pp. 223–68. CSLI Publications, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.2004a. Agree and Agreement: Evidence from Germanic. In (ed.): Focus on Germanic Typology, pp. 59–99. Akademieverlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2004c. The Syntax of Person, Tense and Speech Features. Italian Journal of Linguistics 16: 219–51.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.2004d. Agree and Agreement: Evidence from Germanic. In (ed.): Focus on Germanic Typology, pp. 61–103. Akademie Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson2004e. Icelandic Non-Nominative Subjects: Facts and Implications. In and (eds.): Non-Nominative Subjects 2, pp. 137–59. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
. 2005b. Meaningful Silence, Meaningless Sounds. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 4: 235–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2006a. The Nominative Puzzle and the Low Nominative Hypothesis. Linguistic Inquiry 37. 2: 389–408.Google Scholar
. 2006b. The Icelandic Noun Phrase: Central Traits. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 121: 193–236.Google Scholar
Halldórsson, Halldór, see Halldór Halldórsson.
, and . 2002. A Morphological Analysis of Definite Nouns in Danish. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 14: 137–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Erik, and Lars Heltoft. 1999. Grammatik over det danske sprog. Ms., Roskilde and Copenhagen.
. 1976. The Scandinavian Languages: An Introduction to their History. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
. 1982. Scandinavian Language Structures: A Comparative Historical Survey. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Helgi Bernódusson. 1982. Ópersónulegar setningar. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Hellan, Lars.1986a. The Headedness of NPs in Norwegian. In and (eds.): Features and Projections, pp. 89–122. Foris, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellan, Lars.1986b. On Anaphora and Predication in Norwegian. In and (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 103–24. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellan, Lars.1991a. The Phrasal Nature of Double Object Clusters. In , and (eds.): Issues in Germanic Syntax, pp. 67–92. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars.1991b. Containment and Connectedness Anaphors. In and (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 27–48. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herslund, Michael. 1984. Particles, Prefixes and Preposition Stranding. In and (eds.): Topics in Danish Syntax, pp. 34–71. Nydanske studier og almen kommunikationsteori 14. Akademisk forlag, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
. 1992. LF Movement of Pronouns and Antisubject Orientation. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 557–94.Google Scholar
Hjartardóttir, Thóra Björk, see Thóra Björk Hjartardóttir.
Holmberg, Anders.1986. Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.
Holmberg, Anders.1991a. The Distribution of Scandinavian Weak Pronouns. In and (eds.): Clitics and their Hosts, pp. 155–74. Eurotyp Working Papers, Theme Group 8: Clitics. Tilburg University, Tilburg.Google Scholar
. 1991b. On the Scandinavian Double Object Construction. Papers from the Twelfth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 141–55. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders.1994. The Pros and Cons of Agreement in Scandinavian Impersonals. In , , , and (eds.): Paths towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne, pp. 217–36. Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
. 2000. Scandinavian Stylistic Fronting: How Any Category can Become an Expletive. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 445–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Expletives and Agreement in Scandinavian Passives. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 4: 85–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 1992. The Scandinavian Noun Phrase. Institute of Linguistics, University of Umeå, Umeå.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders, and Christer Platzack.1991. On the Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. In , and (eds.): Issues in Germanic Syntax, pp. 93–118. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
, and . 1995. The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
, and . 2003. Agreement and Movement in Icelandic Raising Constructions. Lingua 113: 997–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Hoop, Helen. 1992. Case Configuration and Noun Phrase Interpretation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen, Groningen. [Published 1996 by Garland, New York.]
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1979. On Complementation in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Published by Garland, New York.
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1984. Different Types of Infinitival Complements in Icelandic. In and (eds.): Sentential Complementation, pp. 247–55. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1986a. V1, V2, V3 in Icelandic. In and (eds.): Verb-Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages, pp. 169–94. Foris, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1986b. On Auxiliaries, AUX and VP in Icelandic. In and (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 235–65. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1990. A Semantic Reflexive in Icelandic. In and (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 289–307. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego. [A slightly revised version of Höskuldur Thráinsson 1976.]Google Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1991. Long Distance Reflexives and the Typology of NPs. In and (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 49–75. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1992. A Note on Underspecification and Binding. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 1, pp. 73–90. Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
. 1993. On the Structure of Infinitival Complements. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 3, pp. 181–213. Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1994a. Icelandic. In and (eds.): The Germanic Languages, pp. 142–89. Routledge, London.
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1994b. Comments on the Paper by Vikner. In and (eds.): Verb Movement, pp. 149–62. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRef
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1996. On the Non-Universality of Functional Categories. In , , and (eds.): Minimal Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework, pp. 253–81. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRef
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1997. The Chapters by Kiparsky, Roberts and Weerman: An Epilogue. In and (eds.): Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, pp. 495–508. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1998. Infinitival Complements in Some Old and Modern Germanic Languages. In (ed.): Historische germanische und deutsche Syntax: Akten des internationalen Symposiums anläßlich des 100. Geburtstages von Ingerid Dal, pp. 335–63. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
. 1999. Review of Anders Holmberg and Christer Platzack: The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Journal of Linguistics 35: 418–30.Google Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.2001a. Object Shift and Scrambling. In and (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 148–202. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.2001b. Syntactic Theory for Faroese and Faroese for Syntactic Theory. In and (eds.): Moderne lingvistiske teorier og færøsk, pp. 89–124. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.2003. Syntactic Variation, Historical Development, and Minimalism. In (ed.): Minimalist Syntax, pp. 152–91. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.2005. Setningar: Handbók um setningafræði. [Editor and main author Höskuldur Thráinsson, co-authors Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson, Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson, Sigríður Magnúsdóttir, Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir and Thórunn Blöndal.] Íslensk tunga 3. Almenna bókafélagið, Reykjavík.
Höskuldur Thráinsson, Samuel David Epstein and Steve Peter. 1996. Introduction. In , and (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax II, pp. vii–xxxix. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRef
Höskuldur Thráinsson, Hjalmar P. Petersen, Jógvan í Lon Jacobsen and Zakaris S. Hansen. 2004. Faroese: A Handbook and Reference Grammar. Føroya Fróðskaparfelag, Tórshavn, and Háskólaútgáfan, Reykjavík.
Höskuldur Thráinsson and Thóra Björk Hjartardóttir. 1986. Pro-Drop, Topic Drop …: Where do Old and Modern Icelandic Fit in? In and (eds.): Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 150–61. Papers from a workshop at the 9th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics. Department of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn, see Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson.
Hróarsdóttir, Thorbjörg, see Thorbjörg Hróarsdóttir.
. 1984. On the Distribution and Reference of Empty Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–74.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James, and C.-C. Jane Tang. 1991. The Local Nature of the Long-Distance Reflexive in Chinese. In and (eds.): Long-Distance Anaphora, pp. 263–82. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1992. So-called ‘Double Objects’ and Grammatical Relations. Language 68: 251–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1990. The Development of ‘Long-Distance Anaphora’: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison with Special Reference to Icelandic. Language Acquisition 1: 57–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1992. The Licensing of CP-recursion and its Relevance to the Germanic Verb-Second Phenomenon. WPSS 50: 1–24.Google Scholar
. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Jakob Jóh. Smári. 1920. Íslenzk setningafræði. Bókaverzlun Ársæls Árnasonar, Reykjavík. [Reprinted by Málvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands, Reykjavík, 1987.]
Jóhanna Barðdal. 1993. Accusative and Dative Case of Objects of Some Transitive Verbs in Icelandic and the Semantic Distinction between them. In Flyktförsök: Kalasbok till Christer Platzack på femtioårsdagen 18 november 1993, från doktorander och dylika, pp. 1–13. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.
. 1999a. Case in Icelandic – A Construction Grammar Approach. Tijdschrift voor Skandinavistiek 20: 65–100.Google Scholar
. 2000a. The Subject is Nominative! On Obsolete Axioms and their Deeprootedness. Papers from the 17th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 93–117. Institute of Language and Communication, University of Odense, Odense.Google Scholar
. 2000c. Case Assignment of Nonce Verbs in Icelandic. SKY Journal of Linguistics 13: 7–28.Google Scholar
. 2001a. The perplexity of Dat-Nom verbs in Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 24: 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jóhanna Barðdal.2001b. Case in Icelandic – A Synchronic, Diachronic and Comparative Approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of Lund, Lund.
. 2006. Construction-Specific Properties of Syntactic Subjects in Icelandic and German. Cognitive Linguistics 17: 39–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 2000. Passive in Icelandic – Compared to Mainland Scandinavian. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 65: 109–46.Google Scholar
and . 2003a. The Change that Never Happened: The Story of Oblique Subject. Journal of Linguistics 39: 439–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 2003b. Icelandic vs. German: Oblique Subjects, Agreement and Expletives. Proceedings of the 39th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago Linguistic Society, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
and . 2005. Case and Control Constructions in German, Faroese and Icelandic: Or How to Evaluate Marginally Acceptable Data?WPSS 75: 1–36.Google Scholar
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson. 1990. The Pronoun maður in Icelandic. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.1996. Clausal Achitecture and Case in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2000a. Definites in Icelandic existentials. In (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics X, pp. 125–34. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2000b. Case and Double Objects in Icelandic. In and (eds.): Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics, pp. 71–94. University of Leeds, LeedsGoogle Scholar
. 2002. S-Adverbs in Icelandic and the Feature Theory of Adverbs. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 9: 73–89.Google Scholar
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2003. Not so Quirky: On Subject Case in Icelandic. In and (eds.): New Perspectives in Case Theory, pp. 127–63. CSLI Publications, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2005a. Merkingarhlutverk, rökliðir og fallmörkun. In : Setningar, pp. 350–409. Almenna bókafélagið, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2005b. Merkingarflokkar nafnliða og setningagerð. In : Setningar, pp. 435–58. Almenna bókafélagið, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
and . 2005. Variation in Subject Case Marking in Insular Scandinavian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 28: 223–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jóhannsdóttir, Kristín M., see Kristín M. Jóhannsdóttir.
. 1985. Some Notes on Subjunctive Clauses and Binding in Icelandic. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 102–37.Google Scholar
Jonas, Dianne. 1994. The TP Parameter in Scandinavian Syntax. In and (eds.): Proceedings of the XIVth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics and the VIIIth Conference of Nordic and General Linguistics, Special Session on Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 33–59. Gothenburg University, Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Jonas, Dianne.1996a. Clause Structures, Expletives and Verb Movement. In , , and (eds.): Minimal Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework, pp. 167–88. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonas, Dianne.1996b. Clause Structure and Verb Syntax in Scandinavian and English. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
Jonas, Dianne.2002. Residual V-to-I. In (ed.): Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, pp. 251–70. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1993. Specs for Subjects: The Role of TP in Icelandic. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 59–98.Google Scholar
Jón G. Friðjónsson. 1986. Um notkun forsetninga í íslensku. Ms., University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli, see Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.
Josefsson, Gunlög.1994. Scandinavian Pronouns and Object Shift. In and (eds.): Clitics: Their Origin, Status and Position, pp. 91–122. Eurotyp Working Papers 6. Tilburg University, TilburgGoogle Scholar
Josefsson, Gunlög.2003. Four Myths about Object Shift in Swedish. In , , and (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003 II, pp. 199–207. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.
. 2002a. Optional ha in Swedish and Norwegian. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5: 67–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2002b. Determiners and Word Order in Scandinavian DPs. Studia Linguistica 56: 264–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Nominal Phrases from a Scandinavian Point of View. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1997. The Rise of Positional Licensing. In and (eds.): Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, pp. 460–94. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul, and Carol Kiparsky. 1970. Fact. In and (eds.): Progress in Linguistics, pp. 143–73. Mouton, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É., see É. Kiss, Katalin.
Kissock, Madelyn. 1995. Reflexive-Middle Constructions and Verb Raising in Telugu. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
. 1986. Mörk orðmyndunar og beygingar: Miðmynd í nútímaíslensku. Íslenskt mál 8: 63–119.Google Scholar
. 1988. A Feature Based Approach to Thematic Roles. Papers from the Tenth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics 2: 135–50.Google Scholar
. 1989. VP-Specifier Subjects and the CP/IP Distinction in Icelandic and Mainland Scandinavian. WPSS 44: 89–100.Google Scholar
. 1991b. Psych-Verbs and Binding in Icelandic. In Papers from the Twelfth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 335–44. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Kjartan G. Ottósson1992. The Icelandic Middle Voice: The Morphological and Phonological Development. Doctoral dissertation, Lund University.
. 1993. Double-Object Small Clauses and Reanalysis in Icelandic Passives. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics XI, pp. 371–87. CSLI Publications, Stanford, Cal.Google Scholar
Kjartan G. Ottósson.1994. Comments on the Paper by Santorini. In and (eds.): Verb Movement, pp. 107–16. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjartan Ottosson. 2003. Subject Positions, Adverbials and Functional Projections in Modern Icelandic. In , , and (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 249–56. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
Kjartansson, Helgi Skúli, see Helgi Skúli Kjartansson.
. 1991. The Distribution of það: An Argument against a Generalized Comp Analysis. In Papers from the Twelfth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 182–93. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
1981. Unmarked Definite NPs and Referential Cohesion in Old Icelandic Narrative. Íslenskt mál 3: 85–100.Google Scholar
, and (eds.). 1991. Long-Distance Anaphora. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kress, Bruno. 1975. Zum Verhältnis syntaktischer Strukturen zu Strukturen der objektiven Realität, dargestellt am Beispiel des Isländischen. In (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics, II, pp. 539–45. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Kristín M. Jóhannsdóttir. 1996. Á sögnum verður sjaldnast skortur: Afleiðslusagnir og innlimunarsagnir í íslensku. MA thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
. 2005. Temporal Adverbs in Icelandic: Adverbs of Quantification vs. Frequency Adverbs. WPSS 76: 31–72.Google Scholar
. 1981. Um merkingu viðtengingarháttar í íslensku. In Afmæliskveðja til Halldórs Halldórssonar, pp. 154–72. Íslenska málfræðifélagið, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
. 1994. Passiv i norrønt og nyislandsk – ei samanliking. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 12: 43–67.Google Scholar
. 1989. Reflexes of Grammar in Patterns of Language Change. Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1975. Three Perspectives in the Functional Approach to Syntax. In Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism, pp. 276–336. Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago.Google Scholar
. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William, and David Dowty. 1987. Towards a Non-Grammatical Account of Thematic Roles. In (ed.): On the Nature of Thematic Roles. Syntax and Semantics 21. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
, and . 1981. Quirky Case and Lexical Representation of Icelandic Verbs. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 185–96. Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lødrup, Helge. 2006. Anaphors without Visible Binders: Evidence from Norwegian. Ms., University of Oslo.
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2001. The Structure of DPs: Some Principles, Parameters and Problems. In and (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 562–603. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Complex Dependencies: The Person-Number Restriction in Icelandic. WPSS 72: 55–90.Google Scholar
Magnússon, Friðrik, see Friðrik Magnússon.
. 1980. Inversion in Embedded Clauses in Modern Icelandic. Íslenskt mál 2: 175–93. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 71–91. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar
. 1984. Non-Clause Bounded Reflexives in Modern Icelandic. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 211–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan.1986. Clause-Bounded Reflexives in Modern Icelandic. In and (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 53–63. Reidel, Dordrecht. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 277–87. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1987. Existential Sentences in Swedish and Icelandic: Reference to Thematic Roles. WPSS 28.Google Scholar
. 1988. Variations on a Theme: Existential Sentences in Swedish and Icelandic. In McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, Special Issue on Germanic Syntax, pp. 168–91. Department of Linguistics, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
. 2001. Dative: The Heterogeneity of Mapping among Morphological Case, Grammatical Functions and Thematic Roles. Lingua 111: 419–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2002b. Það rignir þágufalli á Íslandi: Verbs with Dative Objects in Icelandic. Íslenskt mál 24: 31–105. [A revised version of Maling 2002a.]Google Scholar
, and . 1995. On Nominative Objects in Icelandic and the Feature [+ human]. WPSS 56: 71–9.Google Scholar
, and . 2002. The ‘New Impersonal’ Construction in Icelandic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5: 97–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan, and Rex A. Sprouse. 1995. Structural Case, Specifier-Head Relations, and the Case of Predicate NPs. In , and (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 167–86. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1978. The Nonuniversality of a Surface Filter. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 475–497. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 383–407. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar
, and . 1985. Preposition-Stranding and Passive. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8: 197–209. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 153–64. Academic Press, San Diego.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1987. Parameters, Binding Theory and Learnability. Linguistic Inquiry 18. 3: 413–44.Google Scholar
Martin, Roger. 1992. On the Distribution and Case Features of PRO. Ms., University of Connecticut, Storrs.
McCloskey, James. 1997. Subjecthood and Subject Positions. In (ed.): Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax, pp. 197–235. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milsark, Gary. 1974. Existential Sentences in English. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
. 1977. Toward an Explanation of Certain Peculiarities of the Existential Construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3: 1–29.Google Scholar
Nilsen, Øystein.1998. The Syntax of Circumstantial Adverbials. MA thesis, University of Tromsø, Tromsø.
Orešnik, Janez. 1972. Morphophonemic Notes on the Modern Icelandic Imperative Singular. In , , and (eds.): Studies for Einar Haugen, pp. 450–9. Mouton, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orešnik, Janez.1980. On the Modern Icelandic Clipped Imperative. In (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics, pp. 305–14. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar
Ottosson, Kjartan, see Kjartan Ottosson.
Ottósson, Kjartan G., see Kjartan G. Ottósson.
. 1978. Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Berkeley Linguistics Society 4: 157–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, Inge Lise. 1996. ‘Der kan jo være nogen der kan itte tåle det.’ Om hovedsætningsordstilling i bisætninger. In and (eds.): Studier i talesprogsvariation og sprogkontakt: Til Inger Eskjær på halvfjerdsårsdagen den 20. maj 1996, pp. 242–51. Reitzel, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Pica, Pierre. 1984. On the Distinction between Argumental and Non-Argumental Anaphors. In and (eds.): Sentential Complementation, pp. 185–94. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Pica, Pierre.1991. Antecedent Government and Binding: The Case of Long-Distance Reflexivization. In and (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 119–35. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1979. The Semantic Interpretation of Aspekt and Aktionsarten: A Study of Internal Time Reference in Swedish. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer.1983. Existential Sentences in English, German, Icelandic and Swedish. In (ed.): Papers from the Seventh Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Hanasaari, Finland, December 17–19, 1982, pp. 80–100. Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.Google Scholar
. 1985b. A Survey of Generative Analyses of the Verb Second Phenomenon in Germanic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8: 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer.1986a. Comp, Infl and Germanic Word Order. In and (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 185–234. Foris, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer.1986b. The Structure of Infinitival Clauses in Danish and Swedish. In and (eds.): Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 123–37. Department of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.Google Scholar
. 1988a. The Emergence of a Word Order Difference in Scandinavian Subordinate Clauses. In McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, Special Issue on Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 215–38. Department of Linguistics, McGill Universtiy, Montreal.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer.1988b. Den centralskandinaviska bisatsordföljdens framväxt. In Studier i svensk språkhistoria, pp. 241–55. Lundastudier i nordisk språkvetenskap A 41. Lund University Press, Lund.
Platzack, Christer.1989. The Swedish Supine: An Active Verb Form or the Non-Agreeing Form of the Past Participle? In , , and (eds.): Sentential Complementation and the Lexicon: Studies in Honor of Wim de Geest, pp. 305–19. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer.1996. Small Pro, Weak Agr and Syntactic Differences in Scandinavian. In , and (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax II, pp. 180–96. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Svenskans inre grammatik – det minimalistiska programmet: En introduktion till modern generativ grammatik. Studentlitteratur, Lund.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer.2005. Cross-Germanic Promotion to Subject in Ditransitive Passives – A Feature-Driven Account. In and (eds.): Grammar and Beyond: Essays on Honour of Lars Hellan, pp. 135–61. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
, and . 1997. On the Subject of Imperatives. A Minimalist Account of the Imperative Clause. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1: 177–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1989. Verb Movement, Universal Grammar and the Structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar
. 1992. The Case Filter and Stylistic Fronting in Icelandic. In Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 1, pp. 19–31. Department of Linguistics, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Poole, Geoffrey.1996. Optional Movement in the Minimalist Program. In , , and (eds.): Minimal Ideas, pp. 199–216. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poser, William J. 1992. Blocking of Phrasal Constructions by Lexical Items. In and (eds.): Lexical Matters, pp. 111–30. CSLI, Stanford.Google Scholar
1974. On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
, and . 1988. Expletive Noun Phrases in Subcategorized Positions. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 635–70.Google Scholar
, and . 2002. The Lexical Syntax and Lexical Semantics of the Verb-Particle Construction. In West Coast Conference of Formal Linguistics 21: 387–400. Cascadilla Press, Somerville.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1976. The Syntactic Domain of Anaphora. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Reinhart, Tanya, and Eric Reuland. 1991. Anaphors and Logophors: An Argument Structure Perspective. In and (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 283–321. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuland, Eric, and Jan Koster. 1991. Long-Distance Anaphora: An Overview. In and (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 1–25. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuland, Eric, and Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir. 1997. Long Distance ‘Binding’ in Icelandic: Syntax or Discourse? In , and (eds.): Atomism and Binding, pp. 323–40. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In (ed.): Elements of Grammar, pp. 289–330. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2001. Head Movement. In and (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 113–47. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur, see Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.
. 1999. Morphology-Driven Syntax: A Theory of V to I Raising and Pro-Drop. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. [A revised version of the author's 1994 dissertation The Germanic VO Languages and the Full Paradigm: A Theory of V to I Raising. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. [Published as Infinite Syntax by Arlex Publications, Norwood, New Jersey, 1986.]
Sandøy, Helge. 1976. Laust samansette verb i vestnordisk. Ein samanliknande leddstillingsanalyse for islandsk, færøysk og romsdalsmål. MA thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo.
. 1986. ‘Han er åt og kjem seg.’ Om ein vestnordisk aspektkonstruksjon. Nordisk institutt, Bergen.Google Scholar
. 1991. Attraksjon av supinum i færøsk og norsk. Danske folkemål 33: 251–62. [Papers from the 4th conference of Scandinavian dialectologists, Askov, Denmark, 12–16 August 1990.]Google Scholar
. 1988. Variable Rules vs. Variable Grammars in the History of Yiddish. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 29: 63–73.Google Scholar
Santorini, Beatrice.1989. The Generalization of the Verb-Second Constraint in the History of Yiddish. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Santorini, Beatrice.1994. Some Similarities and Differences between Icelandic and Yiddish. In and (eds.): Verb Movement, pp. 87–106. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, Carson. 2003. Syncretism and Double Agreement with Icelandic Nominative Objects. In , , and (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 295–303. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.
Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir. 1989. The Structure of Icelandic Infinitival Clauses and the Status of the Infinitival Marker að. Ms., University of California, Los Angeles.
Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir.1992. Binding in Icelandic: Evidence from Language Acquisition. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
and . 1992. Reflexivization and Logophoricity: Evidence from the Acquisition of Icelandic. Language Acquisition 2: 359–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 2001. Það var hrint mér á leiðinni í skólann: Þolmynd eða ekki þolmynd?Íslenskt mál 23: 123–80.Google Scholar
Sigríður Valfells. 1970. Middle Voice in Icelandic. In (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics, pp. 551–71. Vísindafélag Íslendinga, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann, see Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.
Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigríður, see Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir.
. 1996. Restrictiveness in Case Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Revised version of the author's 1992 Stanford University dissertation.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1988. A Theory of Floating Quantifiers and its Corollaries for Constituent Structure. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 425–50.Google Scholar
Sprouse, Rex. 1989. On the Syntax of the Double Object Construction in Selected Germanic Languages. Doctoral dissertation, Princeton University, Princeton.
. 1945. Icelandic: Grammar. Texts. Glossary. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md.Google Scholar
2003. Long-Distance Reflexives in Norwegian: A Quantitative Study. Lincom Europa, Munich.Google Scholar
Sundquist, John D. 2002. Object Shift and Holmberg's Generalization in the History of Norwegian. In (ed.): Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, pp. 326–47. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svavarsdóttir, Ásta, see Ásta Svavarsdóttir.
. 1969. Die Stellung des Adverbs im Isländischen. Folia linguistica 3: 307–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter.1996b. The Verb-Particle Alternation in the Scandinavian Languages. Ms., University of Tromsø.
Svenonius, Peter.2000. Quantifier Movement in Icelandic. In (ed.): The Derivation of VO and OV, pp. 255–92. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter.2002a. Subject Positions and the Placement of Adverbials. In (ed.): Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, pp. 202–42. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
. 2002b. Icelandic Case and the Structure of Events. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5: 197–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter.2002c. Introduction. In (ed.): Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, pp. 3–27. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter.2003. Swedish Particles and Directional Prepositions. In , , and (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 343–51. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 1980. On the Nominative Island Condition, Vacuous Application and the that-trace Filter. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Indiana.
. 1984. Some Phrase Structure Dependent Differences between Swedish and Norwegian. WPSS9.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald.1986. Som and the Binding Theory. In and (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 149–84. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Reflexives, Pronouns and Subject/Verb Agreement in Icelandic and Faroese. WPSS 54: 43–58.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald.1995. On Agreement and Nominative Objects in Icelandic. In , and (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 307–27. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1999b. Svenska Akademiens grammatik III. Fraser. Svenska Akademien, Stockholm.Google Scholar
, and . 1999c. Svenska Akademiens grammatik IV. Satser och meningar. Svenska Akademien, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Theódóra Anna Torfadóttir. 2004. Verlaufsformen. Isländisch, Rheinisches Deutsch, Englisch. MA thesis, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin.
. 1993. Getið í eyðurnar: Um eyður fyrir frumlög og andlög í eldri íslensku. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland. [The author's 1987 master's thesis.]Google Scholar
. 2001. Word Order Change in Icelandic: From OV to VO. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Fall á fallanda fæti? Um breytingar á frumlagsfalli í íslensku. Íslenskt mál 22: 185–204.Google Scholar
Thórhallur Eythórsson.2002. Changes in Subject Case-Marking in Icelandic. In (ed.): Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, pp. 196–212. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 2005. Oblique Subjects: A Common Germanic Inheritance. Language 81: 824–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur, see Höskuldur Thráinsson.
Torfadóttir, Theódóra Anna, see Theódóra Anna Torfadóttir.
Torp, Arne. 1992. Der sogenannte ‘Garpegenitiv’: Ursprung, Alter und Verbreitung im heutingen Norwegisch. In and (eds.): Niederdeutsch in Skandinavien III. Papers from the 3rd Symposium ‘Niederdeutsch in Skandinavien’, Sigtuna August 17–20, 1989, pp. 151–66. Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa deMena. 1984. Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
. 1988. The Syntax of Adverbs. In McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, Special Issue on Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 280–310. Department of Linguistics, McGill Universtiy, Montreal.Google Scholar
. 1989. The Null Subject Parameter and the New Mainland Scandinavian Word Order: A Possible Counterexample from a Norwegian Dialect. In Papers from the 11th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics I, pp. 87–100. University of Joensuu, Joensuu.Google Scholar
. 2000. Checking Theory and Grammatical Functions in Universal Grammar. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Valfells, Sigríður, see Sigríður Valfells.
. 1991. Another Look at Icelandic Case Marking and Grammatical Relations. NLLT 9: 145–94.Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.1999. The Identification of Functional Architecture. Doctoral dissertation, University of Bergen, Bergen.
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2000. Skandinaviske presenteringssetninger i minimalistisk perspektiv. In , and (eds.), Menneske, språk og fellesskap: Festskrift til Kirsti Koch Christensen på 60–årsdagen 1. desember 2000. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
. 2001. On Noun Phrase Architecture, Referentiality and Article Systems. Studia Linguistica 55: 249–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2002a. Icelandic Expletive Constructions and the Distribution of Subject Types. In (ed.): Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, pp. 43–70. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2002b. A Verb's Gotta Do What a Verb's Gotta Do! On Scandinavian Infinitivals and the AGR Parameter. In and (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax: Proceedings from the 15th Workshop on Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 203–17. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2003. ‘Identifikasjon’ og morfologiens rolle i den nordiske nominalfrasen. In , and (eds.): Dialektsyntaktiska studier av den nordiska nominalfrasen, pp. 111–94. Novus forlag, Oslo.Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2004. Rolling up the Scandinavian Noun Phrase. Ms., University of Tromsø, Tromsø. [A paper presented at GLOW, Thessaloniki, 2004.]
, and (eds.). 2003. Dialektsyntaktiska studier av den nordiska nominalfrasen. Novus forlag, Oslo.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten.1994. Finite Verb Movement in Scandinavian Embedded Clauses. In and (eds.): Verb Movement, pp. 117–47. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1995a. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
. 1995b. Vo-to-Io Movement and Inflection for Person in All Tenses. WPSS 55: 1–27. [Also published in Liliane Haegeman (ed.) 1997: The New Comparative Syntax, pp. 189–213. Longman, London.]Google Scholar
. 1997. The Interpretation of Object Shift, Optimality Theory and Minimalism. WPSS 60: 1–24.Google Scholar
. 1997–1998. Vo-til-Io flytning og personfleksion i alle tempora. Íslenskt mál 19–20: 85–132.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten.2003. Null Objects under Coordination in Yiddish and Scandinavian. In , , and (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003 II, pp. 365–75. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten, and Bonnie Schwartz. 1995. The Verb Always Leaves IP in V2 Clauses. In and (eds.): Parameters and Functional Heads: Essays in Comparative Syntax, pp. 11–62. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Vinka, Mikael. 1998. Two Disinct Verb Particle Constructions in Swedish. In , and (eds.): Proceedings of ConSole VI, pp. 269–281. HIL, Leiden.Google Scholar
Weerman, Fred. 1997. On the Relation between Morphological and Syntactic Case. In and (eds.): Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, pp. 427–59. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth, and Maria Rita Manzini. 1987. Parameters and Learnability in Binding Theory. In and (eds.): Parameter Setting, pp. 41–76. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whelpton, Matthew. 2006. Resultatives in Icelandic – A Preliminary Investigation. Ms., University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Wide, Camilla. 2002. Perfect in Dialogue. Form and Functional Potential of the vera búinn að + inf. Construction in Contemporary Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
Willson, Kendra. 2000. Grammaticalization, Borrowing and Verb Post-Second Sentences in Icelandic. In (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics X, pp. 253–64. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
. 1997. Four Way Case Systems: Ergative, Nominative, Objective and Accusative. NLLT 15: 181–227.Google Scholar
Woolford, Ellen.2003. Burzio's Generalization, Markedness and Locality Constraints on Nominative Objects. In and (eds.): New Perspectives on Case Theory, pp. 301–29. CSLI Publications, Stanford.Google Scholar
. 2006. Lexical Case, Inherent Case, and Argument Structure. Linguistic Inquiry 37: 111–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaenen, Annie. 1980. Extraction Rules in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Published by Garland, New York, 1985.
, and . 1984. Unaccusative, Passive and Quirky Case. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 3: 317–29. Stanford University. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.) 1990: Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 137–53. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar
, and . 1985. Case and Grammatical Functions: The Icelandic Passive. NLLT 3: 441–83. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.) 1990: Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 95–136. Academic Press, San Diego, and in Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King (eds.) 2006: Lexical Semantics in LFG, pp. 163–207. CSLI Publications, Stanford, Cal.]Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 2001. Sentential Negation. In and (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 511–35. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abney, Peter S. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
1985. Norwegian Verb-Particle Constructions as Causative Constructions. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8: 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Adverb Placement: A Case Study in Antisymmetric Syntax. Linguistics Today 18. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Cynthia L. 1996. A Change in Structural Case Marking in Early Middle English. In , and (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax 2, pp. 3–20. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 38. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1986. The Typology of Anaphoric Dependencies: Icelandic (and Other) Reflexives. In and (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 65–88. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.1990. The Grammar of Icelandic Verbs in -st. In and (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 235–73. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.2002. Syntax and Morphology are Different: Commentary on Jonas. In (ed.): Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, pp. 271–5. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1971. Case Agreement of Predicate Modifiers in Ancient Greek. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 127–51.Google Scholar
1976. The VP Complement Analysis in Modern Icelandic. NELS 6: 1–21. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 165–85. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar
Andrews, Avery D.1982a. The Representation of Case in Modern Icelandic. In (ed.): The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, pp. 427–503. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Andrews, Avery D.1982b. Long Distance Agreement in Modern Icelandic. In and (eds.): The Nature of Syntactic Representation, pp. 1–33. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Avery D.1990. Case Structures and Control. In and (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 187–234. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Angantýsson, Ásgrímur, see Ásgrímur Angantýsson
Anward, Jan. 1974. Swedish Reflexivization. In Papers from the First Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 17–35. Department of Linguistics, University of Göteborg.
Árnason, Kristján, see Kristján Árnason.
Arnbjörnsdóttir, Birna, see Birna Arnbjörnsdóttir.
. 1982. Þágufallssýki. Breytingar á fallnotkun í frumlagssæti ópersónulegra setninga. Íslenskt mál 4: 19–62.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1997. Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure. In (ed.): Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax, pp. 73–137. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, see Jóhanna Barðdal.
1986a. Subject, Nominative and Oblique Case in Faroese. Scripta Islandica 37: 13–46. [Also in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar
1986b. Reflexivisation in Faroese: A Preliminary Survey. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 101: 95–126. [Also in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar
1986–1987. The Faroese Auxiliary Verb munna. Fróðskaparrit 34–35: 42–49. [Also in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar
1987. Some Remarks on Subordinate Clause Word Order in Faroese. Scripta Islandica 38: 3–85. [Also in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael P.1992. Faroese Syntax – Achievements, Goals and Problems. In and (eds.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 7, pp. 17–37. Føroya Fróðskaparfelag, Tórshavn. [Also in Scripta Islandica 43: 28–43 and in Barnes 2001.]Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael P.2002. Head + Modifier or Modifier + Head? In , , and (eds.): Eivindarmál: Heiðursrit til Eivind Weyhe á seksti ára degi hansara 25. April 2002, pp. 59–66. Føroya Fróðskaparfelag, Tórshavn.Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael P., and Eivind Weyhe. 1994. Faroese. In and (eds.): The Germanic Languages, pp. 190–89. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
. 2003. V-to-I Movement in the Absence of Morphological Cues: Evidence from Northern Norwegian. In Papers from the 19th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 573–88. Nordlyd 31. University of Tromsø, Tromsø.Google Scholar
Bergsveinsson, Sveinn, see Sveinn Bergsveinsson.
Bernódusson, Helgi, see Helgi Bernódusson.
Bernstein, Judy B. 2001. The DP Hypothesis: Identifying Clausal Properties in the Nominal Domain. In and (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 536–61. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessason, Haraldur, see Haraldur Bessason.
den Besten, Hans. 1983. On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules. In (ed.): On the Formal Syntax of Westgermania, pp. 47–131. John Benjamins, Amsterdam [First distributed in manuscript form in 1977.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birna Arnbjörnsdóttir. 1990. North American Icelandic: The Linguistic and Social Context of Vowel Mergers. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin. [Available from University of Michigan Dissertation Services since 1995.]
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 1994. What Does Adjacency Do? In and (eds.): The Morphology-Syntax Connection, pp. 1–32. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Department of Linguistics, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David.1995. Morphosyntax: The Syntax of Verbal Inflection. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David.2000. Adjacency and Autonomy: Holmberg's Generalization Revisited. In (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 10, pp. 51–59. Institute of Linguistics, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
. 2002. Realizing Germanic Inflection: Why Morphology Does not Drive Syntax. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 6: 129–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2001. PF Merger in Scandinavian: Stylistic Fronting and Object Shift. WPSS 68: 75–115.Google Scholar
. 2005. On the Locality of the Left Branch Extraction and the Structure of NP. Studia Linguistica 59: 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Die skandinavischen Sprachen im Überblick. Francke Verlag, Tübingen. [2nd revised edition 1999.]Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, and Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1990. A Note on Icelandic Coordination. In and (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 355–65. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi. 1981. Intransitive Verbs and Italian Auxiliaries. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. [Revised edition published as Italian Syntax by Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986.]
. 1991. The Morphological Basis of Anaphora. Journal of Linguistics 27: 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam.1991. Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation. In (ed.): Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, pp. 417–54. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam.1993. A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. In and (eds.): The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, pp. 1–52. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
. 1998. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 15. Department of Linguistics, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
. 1999. Derivation by Phase. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18. Department of Linguistics, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
. 2003. On the Synchronic and Diachronic Status of the Negative Adverbial ikke/not. WPSS 72: 1–53.Google Scholar
Christensen, Ken Ramshøj.2005. Interfaces: Negation – Syntax – Brain. Doctoral dissertation, University of Aarhus.
. 1983. The Categorial Status of Norwegian Infinitival Relatives. In Papers from the 7th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 9–20. Department of Linguistics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Christensen, Kirsti Koch.1986. Norwegian ingen: A Case of Post-syntactic Lexicalization. In and (eds.): Scandinavian Syntax: Papers from a Workshop at the 9th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 21–35. Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.Google Scholar
. 1991a. AGR, Adjunction, and the Structure of Scandinavian Existential Sentences. Lingua 84: 137–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1991b. Skandinaviske presenteringssetninger i GB-teoretisk perspektiv. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 9: 21–49.Google Scholar
Christensen, Kirsti Koch, and Knut Tarald Taraldsen. 1989. Expletive Chain Formation and Past Participle Agreement in Scandinavian Dialects. In (ed.): Dialect Variation and the Theory of Grammar, pp. 53–83. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
. 1995. Adverbs and the Universal Hierarchy of Functional Projections. GLOW Newsletter 34: 14–15.Google Scholar
. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Crosslinguistic Perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
. 1986. English Influence on American German and American Icelandic. Peter Lang, Bern.Google Scholar
1975. The Logophoric Pronoun in Ewe: Its Role in Discourse. Journal of West African Languages 10: 141–77.Google Scholar
, and (eds.). 2001. Long Distance Reflexives. Syntax and Semantics 33. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
, and . 1996. VP-Internal Structure and Object Shift in Icelandic. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 391–444.Google Scholar
. 1990. Tense and Mood in English: A Comparison with Danish. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2004. On the Order of Objects in Icelandic Double Object Constructions. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 85–108.Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1993a. The Internal Structure of Noun Phrases in the Scandinavian Languages. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.
. 1993b. On Attributive Adjectives in Scandinavian and Other Languages. Studia Linguistica 47: 105–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Prepositionsstrandning och kasus i äldre svenska. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 110: 141–78.Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof.1998. Possession in Germanic. In and (eds.): Possessor, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase, pp. 87–108. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof.2003a. Syntaktisk variation i nordiska nominalfraser. In , and (eds.): Dialektsyntaktiska studier av den nordiska nominalfrasen, pp. 11–64. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof.2003b. Preposition Stranding and Case. In , , and (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 75–84. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
Déprez, Viviane. 1989. On the Typology of Syntactic Positions and the Nature of Chains. Move α to the Specifier of Functional Projections. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Diesing, Molly.1996. Semantic Variables and Object Shift. In , and (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax II, pp. 66–84. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Yiddish VP Order and the Typology of Object Movement in Germanic. NLLT 15: 369–427.Google Scholar
Einarsson, Stefán, see Stefán Einarsson.
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson. 1982a: Um orðaröð og færslur í íslensku. MA thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
. 1982b. We Need (Some Kind of) a Rule of Conjunction Reduction. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 557–61. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 349–53. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.1984a. Rightward displacements of NPs in Icelandic. In and (eds.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 5, pp. 362–8. University of Aarhus, Aarhus.Google Scholar
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.1986. Some Comments on Reflexivization in Icelandic. In and (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 89–102. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.1987b. OV Order in Icelandic. In and (eds.): Proceedings of the Seventh Biennial Conference of Teachers of Scandinavian Languages in Great Britain and Northern Ireland, pp. 33–49. Department of Scandinavian, University College, London.Google Scholar
. 1990a. Um orðaröð og færslur í íslensku. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík. [The author's 1982 MA-thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.]Google Scholar
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.1990b. Null objects in Icelandic. In and (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 367–79. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
. 1991. Quirky Subjects in Old Icelandic. Papers from the Twelfth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 369–378. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
1996b. Mikið er það sorglegt að refir skuli ekki geta klifrað í trjám. Höskollu gefið, pp. 14–16. A festschrift for Höskuldur Thráinsson. University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.2005. Setningafræðilegar breytingar í íslensku. In : Setningar, pp. 602–35. Almenna bókafélagið, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson and Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1990. On Icelandic Word Order Once More. In and (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 3–40. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin.2002b. The EPP in a Topic-Prominent Language. In (ed.): Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, pp. 107–24. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Engdahl, Elisabet. 1999. The Choice between bli-Passive and -s-Passive in Danish, Norwegian and Swedish. Ms., University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.
Erteschik, Nomi. 1973. On the Nature of Island Constraints. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Everaert, Martin.1991. Nominative Anaphors in Icelandic: Morphology or Syntax? In , and (eds.): Issues in Germanic Syntax, pp. 277–305. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
Everaert, Martin.2001. Paradigmatic Restrictions on Anaphors. In and (eds.): West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 20: 178–91. Cascadilla Press, Somerville, Mass.Google Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur, see Thórhallur Eythórsson.
Faarlund, Jan Terje. 1977. Transformational Syntax in Dialectology: Scandinavian Word Order Varieties. In and (eds.): Papers from the Trondheim Syntax Symposium, pp. 65–83. University of Trondheim, Trondheim.Google Scholar
. 1990. Syntactic Change: Toward a Theory of Historical Syntax. Mouton, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2004. The Syntax of Old Norse: With a Survey of the Inflectional Morphology and a Complete Bibliography. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Falk, Cecilia.1993. Non-Referential Subjects in the History of Swedish. Doctoral dissertation, Lund University, Lund.
Ferguson, K. Scott. 1996. Shortest Move and Object Case Checking. In , , and (eds.): Minimal Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework, pp. 97–111. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The Case for Case. In and (eds.): Universals in Linguistic Theory, pp. 1–88. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
1971. Some Problems for Case Grammar. Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 245–65. Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
Friðjónsson, Jón G., see Jón G. Friðjónsson.
Friðrik Magnússon.1990. Kjarnafærsla og það-innskot í aukasetningum í íslensku. Málvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands, Reykjavík. [The author's 1989 Master's thesis.]
Gärtner, Hans-Martin. 2003. How Icelandic Can you be if you Speak Icelandic B? In , , and (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 115–22. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
. 1984. Towards a Theory of Long Distance Anaphors: A GB Approach. The Linguistic Review 3: 307–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra.1991. Prepositions, Binding and θ-Marking. In and (eds.): Long-Distance Anaphora, pp. 185–208. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guðmundsson, Helgi, see Helgi Guðmundsson.
. 2001. An Optimality Theory Analysis of Agreement in Icelandic DAT-NOM Constructions. WPSS 68: 15–47.Google Scholar
Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson.2004b. Oblique Subjects and Stylistic Fronting in the History of Scandinavian and English: The Role of IP-Spec. Doctoral dissertation, University of Aarhus, Aarhus.
Gylfi Hafsteinsson. 1998. Um hömlur á röð íslenskra lýsingarorða – og samanburður við önnur tungumál. BA thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Hafsteinsson, Gylfi, see Gylfi Hafsteinsson.
Haider, Hubert. 1997. Extraposition. In , and (eds.): Rightward Movement, pp. 115–51. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert, Susan Olsen and Sten Vikner. 1995. Introduction. In , and (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, I, pp. 1–45. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.). 1986. Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages. Foris, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1982. Um méranir. Drög að samtímalegri og sögulegri athugun. Íslenskt mál 4: 159–89.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1983. Um frásagnarumröðun og grundvallarorðaröð í forníslensku. Master's thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1986. Verb Post-Second in a V2 Language. In and (eds.): Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 138–49. Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1989. Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Lund, Lund. [Reprinted by the Linguistic Institute at the University of Iceland 1992.]
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1990a. V1 Declaratives and Verb Raising in Icelandic. In and (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 41–69. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1990b. Long Distance Reflexives and Moods in Icelandic. In and (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 309–46. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
. 1990c. Icelandic Case Marked PRO and the Licensing of Lexical A-positions. WPSS 45: 35–82.Google Scholar
. 1991. Icelandic Case-Marked PRO and the Licensing of Lexical Arguments. NLLT 9: 327–63.Google Scholar
. 1993b. Agreement as Head Visible Feature Government. Studia Linguistica 47: 32–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1994. Morphological Case, Abstract Case and Licensing. In and (eds.): Proceedings of the 14th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics – Special Session on Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 145–59. Department of Linguistics, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.1997. Öðruvísi frumlög. In , and (eds.): Milli himins og jarðar, pp. 299–306. Háskólaútgáfan, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.2001. Inflectional Features and Clausal Structure. In and (eds.): Nordic and Baltic Morphology, pp. 99–111. Studies in Languages 36, University of Joensuu, Joensuu.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.2003. Case: Abstract vs. Morphological. In and (eds.): New Perspectives on Case Theory, pp. 223–68. CSLI Publications, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.2004a. Agree and Agreement: Evidence from Germanic. In (ed.): Focus on Germanic Typology, pp. 59–99. Akademieverlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2004c. The Syntax of Person, Tense and Speech Features. Italian Journal of Linguistics 16: 219–51.Google Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.2004d. Agree and Agreement: Evidence from Germanic. In (ed.): Focus on Germanic Typology, pp. 61–103. Akademie Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson2004e. Icelandic Non-Nominative Subjects: Facts and Implications. In and (eds.): Non-Nominative Subjects 2, pp. 137–59. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
. 2005b. Meaningful Silence, Meaningless Sounds. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 4: 235–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2006a. The Nominative Puzzle and the Low Nominative Hypothesis. Linguistic Inquiry 37. 2: 389–408.Google Scholar
. 2006b. The Icelandic Noun Phrase: Central Traits. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 121: 193–236.Google Scholar
Halldórsson, Halldór, see Halldór Halldórsson.
, and . 2002. A Morphological Analysis of Definite Nouns in Danish. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 14: 137–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Erik, and Lars Heltoft. 1999. Grammatik over det danske sprog. Ms., Roskilde and Copenhagen.
. 1976. The Scandinavian Languages: An Introduction to their History. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
. 1982. Scandinavian Language Structures: A Comparative Historical Survey. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Helgi Bernódusson. 1982. Ópersónulegar setningar. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Hellan, Lars.1986a. The Headedness of NPs in Norwegian. In and (eds.): Features and Projections, pp. 89–122. Foris, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellan, Lars.1986b. On Anaphora and Predication in Norwegian. In and (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 103–24. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellan, Lars.1991a. The Phrasal Nature of Double Object Clusters. In , and (eds.): Issues in Germanic Syntax, pp. 67–92. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars.1991b. Containment and Connectedness Anaphors. In and (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 27–48. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herslund, Michael. 1984. Particles, Prefixes and Preposition Stranding. In and (eds.): Topics in Danish Syntax, pp. 34–71. Nydanske studier og almen kommunikationsteori 14. Akademisk forlag, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
. 1992. LF Movement of Pronouns and Antisubject Orientation. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 557–94.Google Scholar
Hjartardóttir, Thóra Björk, see Thóra Björk Hjartardóttir.
Holmberg, Anders.1986. Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.
Holmberg, Anders.1991a. The Distribution of Scandinavian Weak Pronouns. In and (eds.): Clitics and their Hosts, pp. 155–74. Eurotyp Working Papers, Theme Group 8: Clitics. Tilburg University, Tilburg.Google Scholar
. 1991b. On the Scandinavian Double Object Construction. Papers from the Twelfth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 141–55. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders.1994. The Pros and Cons of Agreement in Scandinavian Impersonals. In , , , and (eds.): Paths towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne, pp. 217–36. Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
. 2000. Scandinavian Stylistic Fronting: How Any Category can Become an Expletive. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 445–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Expletives and Agreement in Scandinavian Passives. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 4: 85–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 1992. The Scandinavian Noun Phrase. Institute of Linguistics, University of Umeå, Umeå.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders, and Christer Platzack.1991. On the Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. In , and (eds.): Issues in Germanic Syntax, pp. 93–118. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
, and . 1995. The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
, and . 2003. Agreement and Movement in Icelandic Raising Constructions. Lingua 113: 997–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Hoop, Helen. 1992. Case Configuration and Noun Phrase Interpretation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen, Groningen. [Published 1996 by Garland, New York.]
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1979. On Complementation in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Published by Garland, New York.
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1984. Different Types of Infinitival Complements in Icelandic. In and (eds.): Sentential Complementation, pp. 247–55. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1986a. V1, V2, V3 in Icelandic. In and (eds.): Verb-Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages, pp. 169–94. Foris, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1986b. On Auxiliaries, AUX and VP in Icelandic. In and (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 235–65. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1990. A Semantic Reflexive in Icelandic. In and (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 289–307. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego. [A slightly revised version of Höskuldur Thráinsson 1976.]Google Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1991. Long Distance Reflexives and the Typology of NPs. In and (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 49–75. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1992. A Note on Underspecification and Binding. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 1, pp. 73–90. Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
. 1993. On the Structure of Infinitival Complements. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 3, pp. 181–213. Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1994a. Icelandic. In and (eds.): The Germanic Languages, pp. 142–89. Routledge, London.
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1994b. Comments on the Paper by Vikner. In and (eds.): Verb Movement, pp. 149–62. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRef
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1996. On the Non-Universality of Functional Categories. In , , and (eds.): Minimal Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework, pp. 253–81. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRef
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1997. The Chapters by Kiparsky, Roberts and Weerman: An Epilogue. In and (eds.): Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, pp. 495–508. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Höskuldur Thráinsson.1998. Infinitival Complements in Some Old and Modern Germanic Languages. In (ed.): Historische germanische und deutsche Syntax: Akten des internationalen Symposiums anläßlich des 100. Geburtstages von Ingerid Dal, pp. 335–63. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
. 1999. Review of Anders Holmberg and Christer Platzack: The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Journal of Linguistics 35: 418–30.Google Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.2001a. Object Shift and Scrambling. In and (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 148–202. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.2001b. Syntactic Theory for Faroese and Faroese for Syntactic Theory. In and (eds.): Moderne lingvistiske teorier og færøsk, pp. 89–124. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.2003. Syntactic Variation, Historical Development, and Minimalism. In (ed.): Minimalist Syntax, pp. 152–91. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höskuldur Thráinsson.2005. Setningar: Handbók um setningafræði. [Editor and main author Höskuldur Thráinsson, co-authors Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson, Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson, Sigríður Magnúsdóttir, Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir and Thórunn Blöndal.] Íslensk tunga 3. Almenna bókafélagið, Reykjavík.
Höskuldur Thráinsson, Samuel David Epstein and Steve Peter. 1996. Introduction. In , and (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax II, pp. vii–xxxix. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRef
Höskuldur Thráinsson, Hjalmar P. Petersen, Jógvan í Lon Jacobsen and Zakaris S. Hansen. 2004. Faroese: A Handbook and Reference Grammar. Føroya Fróðskaparfelag, Tórshavn, and Háskólaútgáfan, Reykjavík.
Höskuldur Thráinsson and Thóra Björk Hjartardóttir. 1986. Pro-Drop, Topic Drop …: Where do Old and Modern Icelandic Fit in? In and (eds.): Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 150–61. Papers from a workshop at the 9th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics. Department of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn, see Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson.
Hróarsdóttir, Thorbjörg, see Thorbjörg Hróarsdóttir.
. 1984. On the Distribution and Reference of Empty Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–74.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James, and C.-C. Jane Tang. 1991. The Local Nature of the Long-Distance Reflexive in Chinese. In and (eds.): Long-Distance Anaphora, pp. 263–82. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1992. So-called ‘Double Objects’ and Grammatical Relations. Language 68: 251–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1990. The Development of ‘Long-Distance Anaphora’: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison with Special Reference to Icelandic. Language Acquisition 1: 57–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1992. The Licensing of CP-recursion and its Relevance to the Germanic Verb-Second Phenomenon. WPSS 50: 1–24.Google Scholar
. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Jakob Jóh. Smári. 1920. Íslenzk setningafræði. Bókaverzlun Ársæls Árnasonar, Reykjavík. [Reprinted by Málvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands, Reykjavík, 1987.]
Jóhanna Barðdal. 1993. Accusative and Dative Case of Objects of Some Transitive Verbs in Icelandic and the Semantic Distinction between them. In Flyktförsök: Kalasbok till Christer Platzack på femtioårsdagen 18 november 1993, från doktorander och dylika, pp. 1–13. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.
. 1999a. Case in Icelandic – A Construction Grammar Approach. Tijdschrift voor Skandinavistiek 20: 65–100.Google Scholar
. 2000a. The Subject is Nominative! On Obsolete Axioms and their Deeprootedness. Papers from the 17th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 93–117. Institute of Language and Communication, University of Odense, Odense.Google Scholar
. 2000c. Case Assignment of Nonce Verbs in Icelandic. SKY Journal of Linguistics 13: 7–28.Google Scholar
. 2001a. The perplexity of Dat-Nom verbs in Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 24: 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jóhanna Barðdal.2001b. Case in Icelandic – A Synchronic, Diachronic and Comparative Approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of Lund, Lund.
. 2006. Construction-Specific Properties of Syntactic Subjects in Icelandic and German. Cognitive Linguistics 17: 39–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 2000. Passive in Icelandic – Compared to Mainland Scandinavian. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 65: 109–46.Google Scholar
and . 2003a. The Change that Never Happened: The Story of Oblique Subject. Journal of Linguistics 39: 439–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 2003b. Icelandic vs. German: Oblique Subjects, Agreement and Expletives. Proceedings of the 39th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago Linguistic Society, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
and . 2005. Case and Control Constructions in German, Faroese and Icelandic: Or How to Evaluate Marginally Acceptable Data?WPSS 75: 1–36.Google Scholar
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson. 1990. The Pronoun maður in Icelandic. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.1996. Clausal Achitecture and Case in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2000a. Definites in Icelandic existentials. In (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics X, pp. 125–34. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2000b. Case and Double Objects in Icelandic. In and (eds.): Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics, pp. 71–94. University of Leeds, LeedsGoogle Scholar
. 2002. S-Adverbs in Icelandic and the Feature Theory of Adverbs. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 9: 73–89.Google Scholar
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2003. Not so Quirky: On Subject Case in Icelandic. In and (eds.): New Perspectives in Case Theory, pp. 127–63. CSLI Publications, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2005a. Merkingarhlutverk, rökliðir og fallmörkun. In : Setningar, pp. 350–409. Almenna bókafélagið, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.2005b. Merkingarflokkar nafnliða og setningagerð. In : Setningar, pp. 435–58. Almenna bókafélagið, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
and . 2005. Variation in Subject Case Marking in Insular Scandinavian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 28: 223–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jóhannsdóttir, Kristín M., see Kristín M. Jóhannsdóttir.
. 1985. Some Notes on Subjunctive Clauses and Binding in Icelandic. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 102–37.Google Scholar
Jonas, Dianne. 1994. The TP Parameter in Scandinavian Syntax. In and (eds.): Proceedings of the XIVth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics and the VIIIth Conference of Nordic and General Linguistics, Special Session on Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 33–59. Gothenburg University, Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Jonas, Dianne.1996a. Clause Structures, Expletives and Verb Movement. In , , and (eds.): Minimal Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework, pp. 167–88. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonas, Dianne.1996b. Clause Structure and Verb Syntax in Scandinavian and English. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
Jonas, Dianne.2002. Residual V-to-I. In (ed.): Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, pp. 251–70. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1993. Specs for Subjects: The Role of TP in Icelandic. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 59–98.Google Scholar
Jón G. Friðjónsson. 1986. Um notkun forsetninga í íslensku. Ms., University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli, see Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson.
Josefsson, Gunlög.1994. Scandinavian Pronouns and Object Shift. In and (eds.): Clitics: Their Origin, Status and Position, pp. 91–122. Eurotyp Working Papers 6. Tilburg University, TilburgGoogle Scholar
Josefsson, Gunlög.2003. Four Myths about Object Shift in Swedish. In , , and (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003 II, pp. 199–207. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.
. 2002a. Optional ha in Swedish and Norwegian. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5: 67–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2002b. Determiners and Word Order in Scandinavian DPs. Studia Linguistica 56: 264–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Nominal Phrases from a Scandinavian Point of View. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1997. The Rise of Positional Licensing. In and (eds.): Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, pp. 460–94. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul, and Carol Kiparsky. 1970. Fact. In and (eds.): Progress in Linguistics, pp. 143–73. Mouton, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É., see É. Kiss, Katalin.
Kissock, Madelyn. 1995. Reflexive-Middle Constructions and Verb Raising in Telugu. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
. 1986. Mörk orðmyndunar og beygingar: Miðmynd í nútímaíslensku. Íslenskt mál 8: 63–119.Google Scholar
. 1988. A Feature Based Approach to Thematic Roles. Papers from the Tenth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics 2: 135–50.Google Scholar
. 1989. VP-Specifier Subjects and the CP/IP Distinction in Icelandic and Mainland Scandinavian. WPSS 44: 89–100.Google Scholar
. 1991b. Psych-Verbs and Binding in Icelandic. In Papers from the Twelfth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 335–44. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Kjartan G. Ottósson1992. The Icelandic Middle Voice: The Morphological and Phonological Development. Doctoral dissertation, Lund University.
. 1993. Double-Object Small Clauses and Reanalysis in Icelandic Passives. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics XI, pp. 371–87. CSLI Publications, Stanford, Cal.Google Scholar
Kjartan G. Ottósson.1994. Comments on the Paper by Santorini. In and (eds.): Verb Movement, pp. 107–16. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjartan Ottosson. 2003. Subject Positions, Adverbials and Functional Projections in Modern Icelandic. In , , and (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 249–56. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
Kjartansson, Helgi Skúli, see Helgi Skúli Kjartansson.
. 1991. The Distribution of það: An Argument against a Generalized Comp Analysis. In Papers from the Twelfth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 182–93. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
1981. Unmarked Definite NPs and Referential Cohesion in Old Icelandic Narrative. Íslenskt mál 3: 85–100.Google Scholar
, and (eds.). 1991. Long-Distance Anaphora. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kress, Bruno. 1975. Zum Verhältnis syntaktischer Strukturen zu Strukturen der objektiven Realität, dargestellt am Beispiel des Isländischen. In (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics, II, pp. 539–45. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Kristín M. Jóhannsdóttir. 1996. Á sögnum verður sjaldnast skortur: Afleiðslusagnir og innlimunarsagnir í íslensku. MA thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
. 2005. Temporal Adverbs in Icelandic: Adverbs of Quantification vs. Frequency Adverbs. WPSS 76: 31–72.Google Scholar
. 1981. Um merkingu viðtengingarháttar í íslensku. In Afmæliskveðja til Halldórs Halldórssonar, pp. 154–72. Íslenska málfræðifélagið, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
. 1994. Passiv i norrønt og nyislandsk – ei samanliking. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 12: 43–67.Google Scholar
. 1989. Reflexes of Grammar in Patterns of Language Change. Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1975. Three Perspectives in the Functional Approach to Syntax. In Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism, pp. 276–336. Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago.Google Scholar
. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William, and David Dowty. 1987. Towards a Non-Grammatical Account of Thematic Roles. In (ed.): On the Nature of Thematic Roles. Syntax and Semantics 21. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
, and . 1981. Quirky Case and Lexical Representation of Icelandic Verbs. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 185–96. Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lødrup, Helge. 2006. Anaphors without Visible Binders: Evidence from Norwegian. Ms., University of Oslo.
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2001. The Structure of DPs: Some Principles, Parameters and Problems. In and (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 562–603. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Complex Dependencies: The Person-Number Restriction in Icelandic. WPSS 72: 55–90.Google Scholar
Magnússon, Friðrik, see Friðrik Magnússon.
. 1980. Inversion in Embedded Clauses in Modern Icelandic. Íslenskt mál 2: 175–93. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 71–91. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar
. 1984. Non-Clause Bounded Reflexives in Modern Icelandic. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 211–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan.1986. Clause-Bounded Reflexives in Modern Icelandic. In and (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 53–63. Reidel, Dordrecht. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 277–87. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1987. Existential Sentences in Swedish and Icelandic: Reference to Thematic Roles. WPSS 28.Google Scholar
. 1988. Variations on a Theme: Existential Sentences in Swedish and Icelandic. In McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, Special Issue on Germanic Syntax, pp. 168–91. Department of Linguistics, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
. 2001. Dative: The Heterogeneity of Mapping among Morphological Case, Grammatical Functions and Thematic Roles. Lingua 111: 419–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2002b. Það rignir þágufalli á Íslandi: Verbs with Dative Objects in Icelandic. Íslenskt mál 24: 31–105. [A revised version of Maling 2002a.]Google Scholar
, and . 1995. On Nominative Objects in Icelandic and the Feature [+ human]. WPSS 56: 71–9.Google Scholar
, and . 2002. The ‘New Impersonal’ Construction in Icelandic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5: 97–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan, and Rex A. Sprouse. 1995. Structural Case, Specifier-Head Relations, and the Case of Predicate NPs. In , and (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 167–86. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1978. The Nonuniversality of a Surface Filter. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 475–497. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 383–407. Syntax and Semantics 24. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar
, and . 1985. Preposition-Stranding and Passive. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8: 197–209. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.): Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 153–64. Academic Press, San Diego.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1987. Parameters, Binding Theory and Learnability. Linguistic Inquiry 18. 3: 413–44.Google Scholar
Martin, Roger. 1992. On the Distribution and Case Features of PRO. Ms., University of Connecticut, Storrs.
McCloskey, James. 1997. Subjecthood and Subject Positions. In (ed.): Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax, pp. 197–235. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milsark, Gary. 1974. Existential Sentences in English. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
. 1977. Toward an Explanation of Certain Peculiarities of the Existential Construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3: 1–29.Google Scholar
Nilsen, Øystein.1998. The Syntax of Circumstantial Adverbials. MA thesis, University of Tromsø, Tromsø.
Orešnik, Janez. 1972. Morphophonemic Notes on the Modern Icelandic Imperative Singular. In , , and (eds.): Studies for Einar Haugen, pp. 450–9. Mouton, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orešnik, Janez.1980. On the Modern Icelandic Clipped Imperative. In (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics, pp. 305–14. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar
Ottosson, Kjartan, see Kjartan Ottosson.
Ottósson, Kjartan G., see Kjartan G. Ottósson.
. 1978. Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Berkeley Linguistics Society 4: 157–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, Inge Lise. 1996. ‘Der kan jo være nogen der kan itte tåle det.’ Om hovedsætningsordstilling i bisætninger. In and (eds.): Studier i talesprogsvariation og sprogkontakt: Til Inger Eskjær på halvfjerdsårsdagen den 20. maj 1996, pp. 242–51. Reitzel, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Pica, Pierre. 1984. On the Distinction between Argumental and Non-Argumental Anaphors. In and (eds.): Sentential Complementation, pp. 185–94. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Pica, Pierre.1991. Antecedent Government and Binding: The Case of Long-Distance Reflexivization. In and (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 119–35. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1979. The Semantic Interpretation of Aspekt and Aktionsarten: A Study of Internal Time Reference in Swedish. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer.1983. Existential Sentences in English, German, Icelandic and Swedish. In (ed.): Papers from the Seventh Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Hanasaari, Finland, December 17–19, 1982, pp. 80–100. Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.Google Scholar
. 1985b. A Survey of Generative Analyses of the Verb Second Phenomenon in Germanic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8: 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer.1986a. Comp, Infl and Germanic Word Order. In and (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 185–234. Foris, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer.1986b. The Structure of Infinitival Clauses in Danish and Swedish. In and (eds.): Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 123–37. Department of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.Google Scholar
. 1988a. The Emergence of a Word Order Difference in Scandinavian Subordinate Clauses. In McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, Special Issue on Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 215–38. Department of Linguistics, McGill Universtiy, Montreal.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer.1988b. Den centralskandinaviska bisatsordföljdens framväxt. In Studier i svensk språkhistoria, pp. 241–55. Lundastudier i nordisk språkvetenskap A 41. Lund University Press, Lund.
Platzack, Christer.1989. The Swedish Supine: An Active Verb Form or the Non-Agreeing Form of the Past Participle? In , , and (eds.): Sentential Complementation and the Lexicon: Studies in Honor of Wim de Geest, pp. 305–19. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer.1996. Small Pro, Weak Agr and Syntactic Differences in Scandinavian. In , and (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax II, pp. 180–96. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Svenskans inre grammatik – det minimalistiska programmet: En introduktion till modern generativ grammatik. Studentlitteratur, Lund.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer.2005. Cross-Germanic Promotion to Subject in Ditransitive Passives – A Feature-Driven Account. In and (eds.): Grammar and Beyond: Essays on Honour of Lars Hellan, pp. 135–61. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
, and . 1997. On the Subject of Imperatives. A Minimalist Account of the Imperative Clause. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1: 177–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1989. Verb Movement, Universal Grammar and the Structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar
. 1992. The Case Filter and Stylistic Fronting in Icelandic. In Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 1, pp. 19–31. Department of Linguistics, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Poole, Geoffrey.1996. Optional Movement in the Minimalist Program. In , , and (eds.): Minimal Ideas, pp. 199–216. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poser, William J. 1992. Blocking of Phrasal Constructions by Lexical Items. In and (eds.): Lexical Matters, pp. 111–30. CSLI, Stanford.Google Scholar
1974. On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
, and . 1988. Expletive Noun Phrases in Subcategorized Positions. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 635–70.Google Scholar
, and . 2002. The Lexical Syntax and Lexical Semantics of the Verb-Particle Construction. In West Coast Conference of Formal Linguistics 21: 387–400. Cascadilla Press, Somerville.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1976. The Syntactic Domain of Anaphora. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Reinhart, Tanya, and Eric Reuland. 1991. Anaphors and Logophors: An Argument Structure Perspective. In and (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 283–321. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuland, Eric, and Jan Koster. 1991. Long-Distance Anaphora: An Overview. In and (eds.): Long Distance Anaphora, pp. 1–25. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuland, Eric, and Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir. 1997. Long Distance ‘Binding’ in Icelandic: Syntax or Discourse? In , and (eds.): Atomism and Binding, pp. 323–40. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In (ed.): Elements of Grammar, pp. 289–330. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2001. Head Movement. In and (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 113–47. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur, see Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.
. 1999. Morphology-Driven Syntax: A Theory of V to I Raising and Pro-Drop. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. [A revised version of the author's 1994 dissertation The Germanic VO Languages and the Full Paradigm: A Theory of V to I Raising. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. [Published as Infinite Syntax by Arlex Publications, Norwood, New Jersey, 1986.]
Sandøy, Helge. 1976. Laust samansette verb i vestnordisk. Ein samanliknande leddstillingsanalyse for islandsk, færøysk og romsdalsmål. MA thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo.
. 1986. ‘Han er åt og kjem seg.’ Om ein vestnordisk aspektkonstruksjon. Nordisk institutt, Bergen.Google Scholar
. 1991. Attraksjon av supinum i færøsk og norsk. Danske folkemål 33: 251–62. [Papers from the 4th conference of Scandinavian dialectologists, Askov, Denmark, 12–16 August 1990.]Google Scholar
. 1988. Variable Rules vs. Variable Grammars in the History of Yiddish. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 29: 63–73.Google Scholar
Santorini, Beatrice.1989. The Generalization of the Verb-Second Constraint in the History of Yiddish. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Santorini, Beatrice.1994. Some Similarities and Differences between Icelandic and Yiddish. In and (eds.): Verb Movement, pp. 87–106. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, Carson. 2003. Syncretism and Double Agreement with Icelandic Nominative Objects. In , , and (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 295–303. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.
Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir. 1989. The Structure of Icelandic Infinitival Clauses and the Status of the Infinitival Marker að. Ms., University of California, Los Angeles.
Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir.1992. Binding in Icelandic: Evidence from Language Acquisition. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
and . 1992. Reflexivization and Logophoricity: Evidence from the Acquisition of Icelandic. Language Acquisition 2: 359–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 2001. Það var hrint mér á leiðinni í skólann: Þolmynd eða ekki þolmynd?Íslenskt mál 23: 123–80.Google Scholar
Sigríður Valfells. 1970. Middle Voice in Icelandic. In (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics, pp. 551–71. Vísindafélag Íslendinga, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann, see Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson.
Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigríður, see Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir.
. 1996. Restrictiveness in Case Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Revised version of the author's 1992 Stanford University dissertation.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1988. A Theory of Floating Quantifiers and its Corollaries for Constituent Structure. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 425–50.Google Scholar
Sprouse, Rex. 1989. On the Syntax of the Double Object Construction in Selected Germanic Languages. Doctoral dissertation, Princeton University, Princeton.
. 1945. Icelandic: Grammar. Texts. Glossary. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md.Google Scholar
2003. Long-Distance Reflexives in Norwegian: A Quantitative Study. Lincom Europa, Munich.Google Scholar
Sundquist, John D. 2002. Object Shift and Holmberg's Generalization in the History of Norwegian. In (ed.): Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, pp. 326–47. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svavarsdóttir, Ásta, see Ásta Svavarsdóttir.
. 1969. Die Stellung des Adverbs im Isländischen. Folia linguistica 3: 307–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter.1996b. The Verb-Particle Alternation in the Scandinavian Languages. Ms., University of Tromsø.
Svenonius, Peter.2000. Quantifier Movement in Icelandic. In (ed.): The Derivation of VO and OV, pp. 255–92. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter.2002a. Subject Positions and the Placement of Adverbials. In (ed.): Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, pp. 202–42. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
. 2002b. Icelandic Case and the Structure of Events. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5: 197–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter.2002c. Introduction. In (ed.): Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, pp. 3–27. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter.2003. Swedish Particles and Directional Prepositions. In , , and (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003, II, pp. 343–51. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 1980. On the Nominative Island Condition, Vacuous Application and the that-trace Filter. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Indiana.
. 1984. Some Phrase Structure Dependent Differences between Swedish and Norwegian. WPSS9.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald.1986. Som and the Binding Theory. In and (eds.): Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, pp. 149–84. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Reflexives, Pronouns and Subject/Verb Agreement in Icelandic and Faroese. WPSS 54: 43–58.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald.1995. On Agreement and Nominative Objects in Icelandic. In , and (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 307–27. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1999b. Svenska Akademiens grammatik III. Fraser. Svenska Akademien, Stockholm.Google Scholar
, and . 1999c. Svenska Akademiens grammatik IV. Satser och meningar. Svenska Akademien, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Theódóra Anna Torfadóttir. 2004. Verlaufsformen. Isländisch, Rheinisches Deutsch, Englisch. MA thesis, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin.
. 1993. Getið í eyðurnar: Um eyður fyrir frumlög og andlög í eldri íslensku. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland. [The author's 1987 master's thesis.]Google Scholar
. 2001. Word Order Change in Icelandic: From OV to VO. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Fall á fallanda fæti? Um breytingar á frumlagsfalli í íslensku. Íslenskt mál 22: 185–204.Google Scholar
Thórhallur Eythórsson.2002. Changes in Subject Case-Marking in Icelandic. In (ed.): Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, pp. 196–212. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 2005. Oblique Subjects: A Common Germanic Inheritance. Language 81: 824–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur, see Höskuldur Thráinsson.
Torfadóttir, Theódóra Anna, see Theódóra Anna Torfadóttir.
Torp, Arne. 1992. Der sogenannte ‘Garpegenitiv’: Ursprung, Alter und Verbreitung im heutingen Norwegisch. In and (eds.): Niederdeutsch in Skandinavien III. Papers from the 3rd Symposium ‘Niederdeutsch in Skandinavien’, Sigtuna August 17–20, 1989, pp. 151–66. Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa deMena. 1984. Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
. 1988. The Syntax of Adverbs. In McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, Special Issue on Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 280–310. Department of Linguistics, McGill Universtiy, Montreal.Google Scholar
. 1989. The Null Subject Parameter and the New Mainland Scandinavian Word Order: A Possible Counterexample from a Norwegian Dialect. In Papers from the 11th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics I, pp. 87–100. University of Joensuu, Joensuu.Google Scholar
. 2000. Checking Theory and Grammatical Functions in Universal Grammar. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Valfells, Sigríður, see Sigríður Valfells.
. 1991. Another Look at Icelandic Case Marking and Grammatical Relations. NLLT 9: 145–94.Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.1999. The Identification of Functional Architecture. Doctoral dissertation, University of Bergen, Bergen.
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2000. Skandinaviske presenteringssetninger i minimalistisk perspektiv. In , and (eds.), Menneske, språk og fellesskap: Festskrift til Kirsti Koch Christensen på 60–årsdagen 1. desember 2000. Novus, Oslo.Google Scholar
. 2001. On Noun Phrase Architecture, Referentiality and Article Systems. Studia Linguistica 55: 249–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2002a. Icelandic Expletive Constructions and the Distribution of Subject Types. In (ed.): Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, pp. 43–70. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2002b. A Verb's Gotta Do What a Verb's Gotta Do! On Scandinavian Infinitivals and the AGR Parameter. In and (eds.): Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax: Proceedings from the 15th Workshop on Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 203–17. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2003. ‘Identifikasjon’ og morfologiens rolle i den nordiske nominalfrasen. In , and (eds.): Dialektsyntaktiska studier av den nordiska nominalfrasen, pp. 111–94. Novus forlag, Oslo.Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander.2004. Rolling up the Scandinavian Noun Phrase. Ms., University of Tromsø, Tromsø. [A paper presented at GLOW, Thessaloniki, 2004.]
, and (eds.). 2003. Dialektsyntaktiska studier av den nordiska nominalfrasen. Novus forlag, Oslo.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten.1994. Finite Verb Movement in Scandinavian Embedded Clauses. In and (eds.): Verb Movement, pp. 117–47. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1995a. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
. 1995b. Vo-to-Io Movement and Inflection for Person in All Tenses. WPSS 55: 1–27. [Also published in Liliane Haegeman (ed.) 1997: The New Comparative Syntax, pp. 189–213. Longman, London.]Google Scholar
. 1997. The Interpretation of Object Shift, Optimality Theory and Minimalism. WPSS 60: 1–24.Google Scholar
. 1997–1998. Vo-til-Io flytning og personfleksion i alle tempora. Íslenskt mál 19–20: 85–132.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten.2003. Null Objects under Coordination in Yiddish and Scandinavian. In , , and (eds.): Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack 18 November 2003 II, pp. 365–75. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten, and Bonnie Schwartz. 1995. The Verb Always Leaves IP in V2 Clauses. In and (eds.): Parameters and Functional Heads: Essays in Comparative Syntax, pp. 11–62. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Vinka, Mikael. 1998. Two Disinct Verb Particle Constructions in Swedish. In , and (eds.): Proceedings of ConSole VI, pp. 269–281. HIL, Leiden.Google Scholar
Weerman, Fred. 1997. On the Relation between Morphological and Syntactic Case. In and (eds.): Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, pp. 427–59. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth, and Maria Rita Manzini. 1987. Parameters and Learnability in Binding Theory. In and (eds.): Parameter Setting, pp. 41–76. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whelpton, Matthew. 2006. Resultatives in Icelandic – A Preliminary Investigation. Ms., University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
Wide, Camilla. 2002. Perfect in Dialogue. Form and Functional Potential of the vera búinn að + inf. Construction in Contemporary Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
Willson, Kendra. 2000. Grammaticalization, Borrowing and Verb Post-Second Sentences in Icelandic. In (ed.): The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics X, pp. 253–64. Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
. 1997. Four Way Case Systems: Ergative, Nominative, Objective and Accusative. NLLT 15: 181–227.Google Scholar
Woolford, Ellen.2003. Burzio's Generalization, Markedness and Locality Constraints on Nominative Objects. In and (eds.): New Perspectives on Case Theory, pp. 301–29. CSLI Publications, Stanford.Google Scholar
. 2006. Lexical Case, Inherent Case, and Argument Structure. Linguistic Inquiry 37: 111–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaenen, Annie. 1980. Extraction Rules in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Published by Garland, New York, 1985.
, and . 1984. Unaccusative, Passive and Quirky Case. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 3: 317–29. Stanford University. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.) 1990: Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 137–53. Academic Press, San Diego.]Google Scholar
, and . 1985. Case and Grammatical Functions: The Icelandic Passive. NLLT 3: 441–83. [Also published in Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.) 1990: Modern Icelandic Syntax, pp. 95–136. Academic Press, San Diego, and in Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King (eds.) 2006: Lexical Semantics in LFG, pp. 163–207. CSLI Publications, Stanford, Cal.]Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 2001. Sentential Negation. In and (eds.): The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 511–35. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar