Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:18:34.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2022

Arjan A. Nijk
Arjan A. Nijk
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, The Netherlands

Summary

A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Chapter
Information
Tense-Switching in Classical Greek
A Cognitive Approach
 , pp. 293 - 313
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

References

Primary Sources

Text: de Budé, Guy, and Martin, Victor. 1927. Eschine: Discours (2 vols.). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Translation: Adams, Charles D. 1919. The speeches of Aeschines. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press/London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Text: Page, Denys. 1972. Aeschyli septem quae supersunt tragoediae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Translation: Sommerstein, Alan H. 2008. Aeschylus (2 vols.). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dalmeyda, Georges. 1930. Andocide: Discours. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Text: Wilson, Nigel G. 2007. Aristophanis fabulae (2 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Translation: Henderson, Jeffrey. 1998–2002. Aristophanes (vols. 1–4). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, William D. 1959. Aristotelis ars rhetorica. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
The years of Lyndon Johnson: Master of the senate. 2003. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Radermacher, Ludwig. 1901. Demetrii Phalerei qui dicitur de elocutione libellus. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Text: Butcher, Samuel H., and Rennie, William. 1903–1931. Demosthenis orationes (3 vols.). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Translations: Murray, A. T. 1936–1939. Demosthenes: Speeches (vols. 4–6). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vince, C. A., and Vince, James H.. 1926. Demosthenes II: De corona, De falsa legatione. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press/London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Conomis, Nicos C. 1975. Dinarchi orationes cum fragmentis. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Radermacher, Ludwig, and Usener, Hermann. 1899. Dionysii Halicarnasei quae exstant (vol. v). Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
La page du duc de Savoie [The page of the duke of Savoy]. 1974 (vol. i). Geneva: Famot.Google Scholar
Les mohicans de Paris [Mohicans of Paris]. 1998 (vol. i). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Texts: Diggle, James. 1970. Euripides: Phaethon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Diggle, James. 1981–1994. Euripidis fabulae (3 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Translation: Kovacs, David. 1994–2002. Euripides (6 vols.). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hude, Karl. 1927.3 Herodoti historiae (2 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tom Brown’s schooldays. 1994. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Jensen, Christian C. 1917. Hyperidis orationes sex cum ceterarum fragmentis. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Roussel, Pierre. 1960.2 Isée: Discours. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Brémond, Émile, and Mathieu, Georges. 1929. Isocrate: Discours (4 vols.). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Russell, Donald A. 1974. Libellus de sublimitate Dionysio Longino fere adscriptus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Conomis, Nicos C. (building on work by Carl Scheibe and Friedrich Blass) 1970. Lycurgi oratio in Leocratem. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Carey, Christopher. 2007. Lysiae orationes cum fragmentis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sandbach, Francis H. 1990. Menandri reliquiae selectae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakoby, Felix. 1904. Das Marmor Parium. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Jakoby, Felix. 1929. Die Fragmente der griechischen Historiker (vol. ii, part ii). Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Rotstein, Andrea. 2016. Literary History in the Parian Marble. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies. https://chs.harvard.edu/CHS/article/display/6492.andrea-rotstein-literary-history-in-the-parian-marble.Google Scholar
Fowler, Robert L. 2000. Early Greek mythography (vol. i). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burnet, John. 1910.2 Platonis opera (vol. ii). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Slings, Simon R. 2003. Platonis respublica. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Macbeth. 1977. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Text: Lloyd-Jones, Hugh, and Wilson, Nigel G.. 1990. Sophoclis fabulae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Translations: Jebb, Richard C. 1908.2 Sophocles, the plays and fragments. Part V: The Trachiniae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, Hugh. 1994. Sophocles (2 vols.). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wimmer, Friedrich. 1862. Theophrasti Eresii opera quae supersunt omnia. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Text: Jones, Henry S., and Powell, John E.. 1942. Thucydidis historiae (2 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Translations: Dent, J. M. 1910. Thucydides: History of the Peloponnesian War. New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar
Smith, Charles F. 1919. Thucydides (vol. i). London: William Heinemann/New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B. 1969. P. Vergili Maronis opera. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Psmith in the city. 1975. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Text: Marchant, Edgar C. 1900–1910. Xenophontis opera omnia (vols. 1, 3, 4). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Translation: Brownson, Charleton L. 1921. Xenophon: Hellenica, books VI and VII; Anabasis, books I-III. London: William Heinemann/New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Text: de Budé, Guy, and Martin, Victor. 1927. Eschine: Discours (2 vols.). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Translation: Adams, Charles D. 1919. The speeches of Aeschines. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press/London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Text: Page, Denys. 1972. Aeschyli septem quae supersunt tragoediae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Translation: Sommerstein, Alan H. 2008. Aeschylus (2 vols.). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dalmeyda, Georges. 1930. Andocide: Discours. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Text: Wilson, Nigel G. 2007. Aristophanis fabulae (2 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Translation: Henderson, Jeffrey. 1998–2002. Aristophanes (vols. 1–4). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, William D. 1959. Aristotelis ars rhetorica. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
The years of Lyndon Johnson: Master of the senate. 2003. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Radermacher, Ludwig. 1901. Demetrii Phalerei qui dicitur de elocutione libellus. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Text: Butcher, Samuel H., and Rennie, William. 1903–1931. Demosthenis orationes (3 vols.). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Translations: Murray, A. T. 1936–1939. Demosthenes: Speeches (vols. 4–6). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vince, C. A., and Vince, James H.. 1926. Demosthenes II: De corona, De falsa legatione. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press/London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Conomis, Nicos C. 1975. Dinarchi orationes cum fragmentis. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Radermacher, Ludwig, and Usener, Hermann. 1899. Dionysii Halicarnasei quae exstant (vol. v). Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
La page du duc de Savoie [The page of the duke of Savoy]. 1974 (vol. i). Geneva: Famot.Google Scholar
Les mohicans de Paris [Mohicans of Paris]. 1998 (vol. i). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Texts: Diggle, James. 1970. Euripides: Phaethon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Diggle, James. 1981–1994. Euripidis fabulae (3 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Translation: Kovacs, David. 1994–2002. Euripides (6 vols.). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hude, Karl. 1927.3 Herodoti historiae (2 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tom Brown’s schooldays. 1994. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Jensen, Christian C. 1917. Hyperidis orationes sex cum ceterarum fragmentis. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Roussel, Pierre. 1960.2 Isée: Discours. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Brémond, Émile, and Mathieu, Georges. 1929. Isocrate: Discours (4 vols.). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Russell, Donald A. 1974. Libellus de sublimitate Dionysio Longino fere adscriptus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Conomis, Nicos C. (building on work by Carl Scheibe and Friedrich Blass) 1970. Lycurgi oratio in Leocratem. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Carey, Christopher. 2007. Lysiae orationes cum fragmentis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sandbach, Francis H. 1990. Menandri reliquiae selectae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakoby, Felix. 1904. Das Marmor Parium. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Jakoby, Felix. 1929. Die Fragmente der griechischen Historiker (vol. ii, part ii). Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Rotstein, Andrea. 2016. Literary History in the Parian Marble. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies. https://chs.harvard.edu/CHS/article/display/6492.andrea-rotstein-literary-history-in-the-parian-marble.Google Scholar
Fowler, Robert L. 2000. Early Greek mythography (vol. i). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burnet, John. 1910.2 Platonis opera (vol. ii). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Slings, Simon R. 2003. Platonis respublica. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Macbeth. 1977. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Text: Lloyd-Jones, Hugh, and Wilson, Nigel G.. 1990. Sophoclis fabulae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Translations: Jebb, Richard C. 1908.2 Sophocles, the plays and fragments. Part V: The Trachiniae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, Hugh. 1994. Sophocles (2 vols.). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wimmer, Friedrich. 1862. Theophrasti Eresii opera quae supersunt omnia. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Text: Jones, Henry S., and Powell, John E.. 1942. Thucydidis historiae (2 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Translations: Dent, J. M. 1910. Thucydides: History of the Peloponnesian War. New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar
Smith, Charles F. 1919. Thucydides (vol. i). London: William Heinemann/New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B. 1969. P. Vergili Maronis opera. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Psmith in the city. 1975. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Text: Marchant, Edgar C. 1900–1910. Xenophontis opera omnia (vols. 1, 3, 4). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Translation: Brownson, Charleton L. 1921. Xenophon: Hellenica, books VI and VII; Anabasis, books I-III. London: William Heinemann/New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Adema, Suzanne M. 2008. Discourse modes and bases: A study of the use of tenses in Vergil’s Aeneid. PhD dissertation, Free University Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Adema, Suzanne M. 2019. Tenses in Vergil’s Aeneid: Narrative style and structure. Leiden and Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aerts, Simon. 2014. A systemic functional ‘three-dimensional’ approach to aspect in Thucydides’ Histories III. Symbolae Osloenses 88, 2–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahlner, Felix, and Zlatev, Jordan. 2010. Cross-modal iconicity: A cognitive semiotic approach to sound symbolism. Sign Systems Studies 38.1, 298–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, Rutger J. 2003. The middle voice in ancient Greek: A study in polysemy. Amsterdam: Gieben.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, Rutger J. 2007. Sense and sentence complexity: Sentence structure, sentence connection, and tense-aspect as indicators of narrative mode in Thucydides’ Histories. In Allan, Rutger J. and Buijs, Michel (eds.). The language of literature: Linguistic approaches to classical texts. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 93–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, Rutger J. 2009. Towards a typology of the narrative modes in ancient Greek: Text types and narrative structure in Euripidean messenger speeches. In Bakker, Stéphanie J. and Wakker, Gerry C. (eds.). Discourse cohesion in ancient Greek. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 171–204.Google Scholar
Allan, Rutger J. 2011a. The historical present in Thucydides: Capturing the case of αἱρεῖ and λαμβάνει. In Lallot, Jean et al. (eds.). The historical present in Thucydides: Semantics and narrative function. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 37–63.Google Scholar
Allan, Rutger J. 2011b. (one of ‘quatre excercices’) 1. The Archaeology: The case of γίγνεται. 2. Themistocles. In Lallot, Jean et al. (eds.) The historical present in Thucydides: Semantics and narrative function. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 243–51.Google Scholar
Allan, Rutger J. 2013. History as presence: Time, tense and narrative modes in Thucydides. In Tsakmakis, Antonis and Tamiolaki, Mélina (eds.). Thucydides between history and literature. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. 371–90.Google Scholar
Allan, Rutger J. 2014. Changing the topic: Topic positions in ancient Greek word order. Mnemosyne 67.2, 181–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, Rutger J. 2017. The imperfect unbound: A cognitive linguistic approach to Greek aspect. In Bentein, Klaas, Janse, Mark and Soltic, Jorie (eds.). Variation and change in ancient Greek tense, aspect and modality. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 100–30.Google Scholar
Allan, Rutger J. 2018. Herodotus and Thucydides: Distance and immersion. In van Gils, Lidewij, de Jong, Irene J. F. and Kroon, Caroline (eds.). Textual strategies in ancient war narrative: Thermopylae, Cannae and beyond. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 131–54.Google Scholar
Allan, Rutger J., de Jong, Irene J. F. and de Jonge, Casper C.. 2017. From enargeia to immersion: The ancient roots of a modern concept. Style 51.1, 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 2001. Accessibility theory: An overview. In Sanders, Ted, Schilperoord, Joost and Spooren, Wilbert (eds.). Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 29–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, Nicholas, and Lascarides, Alex. 2003. Logics of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Badian, Ernst, and Heskel, Julia. 1987. Aeschines 2.12–18: A study in rhetoric and chronology. Phoenix 41.3, 264–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Egbert J. 1993. Boundaries, topics, and the structure of discourse: An investigation of the ancient Greek particle dé. Studies in Language 17.2, 275–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Egbert J. 1997. Verbal aspect and mimetic description in Thucydides. In Bakker, Egbert J. (ed.). Grammar as interpretation: Greek literature in its linguistic contexts. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 7–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Egbert J. 2006. Contract and design: Thucydides’ writing. In Rengakos, Antonis and Tsakmakis, Antonis (eds.). Brill’s companion to Thucydides. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 109–29.Google Scholar
Bakker, Stéphanie J. 2009. On the curious combination of the particles γάρ and οὖν. In Bakker, Stéphanie J. and Wakker, Gerry C. (eds.). Discourse cohesion in ancient Greek. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bal, Mieke. 2014. Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Bary, Corien L. A. 2012. The ancient Greek tragic aorist revisited. Glotta 88, 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basset, Louis. 2009. The use of the imperfect to express completed states of affairs: The imperfect as a marker of narrative cohesion. In Bakker, Stéphanie J. and Wakker, Gerry C. (eds.). Discourse cohesion in ancient Greek. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 205–19.Google Scholar
Beekes, Robert S. P. (with the assistance of Lucien van Beek). 2010. Etymological dictionary of Greek (2 vols.). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1959. Les relations de temps dans le verbe français. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 54, 237–50.Google Scholar
Bergen, Benjamin K. 2012. Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bergson, Leif. 1953. The omitted augment in the messengers’ speeches of Greek tragedy. Eranos 51, 121–8.Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. 1988. On the ability to relate events in narrative. Discourse Processes 11.4, 469–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier M., and Delfitto, Denis. 2000. Aspect vs. actionality: Why they should be kept apart. In Dahl, Östen (ed.). Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. 189–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, Godfrey W. 1981. Euripides: Heracles. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Bonifazi, Anna, Drummen, Annemieke and de Kreij, Mark. 2016. Particles in ancient Greek discourse: Five volumes exploring particle use across genres. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn3:hul.ebook:CHS_BonifaziA_DrummenA_deKreijM.Particles_in_Ancient_Greek_Discourse.2016.Google Scholar
Bonilla, Carrie L. 2011. The conversational historical present in oral Spanish narratives. Hispania 94.3, 429–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, Wayne C. 1961. The rhetoric of fiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boter, Gerard J. 2012. The historical present of atelic and durative verbs in Greek tragedy. Philologus 156.2, 207–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresson, Alain. 2016. The making of the ancient Greek economy. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1992. The historical present in Charlotte Brontë’s novels: Some discourse functions. Style 26, 221–44.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisard, Frank. 2002. The English present. In Brisard, Frank (ed.). Grounding: The epistemic footing of deixis and reference. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. 251–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisard, Frank. 2013. An account of English tense and aspect in Cognitive Grammar. In Jaszczolt, Katarzyna M. and de Saussure, Louis (eds.). Time: Language, cognition and reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 210–35.Google Scholar
Broyd, Samantha J., Demanuele, Charmaine, Debener, Stefan, Helps, Suzannah K., James, Christopher J. and Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J. S.. 2009. Default-mode brain dysfunction in mental disorders: A systematic review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 33.3, 279–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brugmann, Karl. 1904. Die Demonstrativpronomina der indogermanischen Sprachen: Eine bedeutungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Buckner, Randy L., Andrews-Hanna, Jessica R. and Schacter, Daniel L.. 2008. The brain’s default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1124.1, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bühler, Karl. 1990. Theory of language: The representational function of language. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [Translation of 1934. Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Gustav Fischer.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buijs, Michel. 2005. Clause combining in ancient Greek narrative discourse: The distribution of subclauses and participial clauses in Xenophon’s Hellenica and Anabasis. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Buijs, Michel. 2007. Aspectual differences and narrative technique: Xenophon’s Hellenica and Agesilaus. In Allan, Rutger J. and Buijs, Michel (eds.). The language of literature: Linguistic approaches to classical texts. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 122–53.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere D. and Pagliuca, William. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Caracciolo, Marco. 2012. Notes for a(nother) theory of experientiality. Journal of Literary Theory 6, 141–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caracciolo, Marco. 2014a. The experientiality of narrative: An enactivist approach. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caracciolo, Marco. 2014b. Experientiality. In Hühn, Peter, Meister, Jan C., Pier, John and Schmid, Wolf (eds.). The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press. www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/telling-vs-showing.Google Scholar
Carey, Christopher. 1992. Apollodoros: Against Neaira [Demosthenes]. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Janice. 2005. Oral narration in modern French: A linguistic analysis of temporal Patterns. Leeds: Legenda.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Janice. 2012. Discourse and text. In Binnick, Robert I. (ed.). The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 306–34.Google Scholar
Casparis, Christian P. 1975. Tense without time: The present tense in narration. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, consciousness and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chatman, Seymour B. 1978. Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cienki, Alan, and Müller, Cornelia. 2008. Metaphor, gesture, and thought. In Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. (ed.). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 483–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clanchy, Michael. 1979. From memory to written record: England 1066–1307. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 2016. Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological review 123.3, 324–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, Herbert H., and Gerrig, Richard J.. 1990. Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66.4, 764–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Classen, Johannes, and Steup, Julius. 1919.5 Thukydides. I: Einleitung; Erstes Buch. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Collard, Christopher. 1975. Euripides: Supplices (2 vols.). Groningen: Bouma’s Boekhuis.Google Scholar
Cornish, Francis. 2010. Anaphora: Text-based or discourse-dependent? Functionalist vs. formalist accounts. Functions of Language 17.2, 207–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornish, Francis. 2011. ‘Strict’ anadeixis, discourse deixis and text structuring. Language Sciences 33.5, 753–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crellin, Robert. 2020. The perfect system in Ancient Greek. In Crellin, Robert and Jügel, Thomas (eds.). Perfects in Indo-European languages and beyond. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 435–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropp, Martin. 2013. Euripides: Electra. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Cutrer, L. Michelle. 1994. Time and tense in narratives and everyday language. PhD dissertation, University of California.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara. 2011. The language of stories: A cognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara, Wei-Lun, Lu and Verhagen, Arie (eds.). 2016. Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara, and Sweetser, Eve (eds.). 2012. Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara, and Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2016. Discourse viewpoint as network. In Dancygier, Barbara et al. (eds.). Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter. 13–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Malcolm. 1991. Sophocles: Trachiniae. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat. 1991. Tense in English: Its structure and use in discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Denniston, John D. 1954.2 The Greek particles. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
de Saussure, Louis. 2013. Perspectival interpretations of tenses. In Jaszczolt, Kasia M. and de Saussure, Louis (eds.). Time: Language, cognition, and reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 46–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2006. Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive linguistics 17.4, 463–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2011. Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics 49.2, 365–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark, Blasi, Damián E., Lupyan, Gary, Christiansen, Morten H. and Monaghan, Padraic. 2015. Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19.10, 603–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodds, Eric R. 1960.2 Euripides: Bacchae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dover, Kenneth J. 1968. Aristophanes: Clouds. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterling, Pat. 1982. Sophocles: Trachiniae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edmunds, Lowell. 1993. Thucydides in the act of writing. In Pretagostini, R. (ed.). Tradizione e innovazione nella cultura greca: Da Omero all’ età ellenistica. Rome: Gruppo Editoriale Internazionale. 831–52.Google Scholar
Elleström, Lars. 2017. Bridging the gap between image and metaphor through cross-modal iconicity: An interdisciplinary model. In Zirker, Angelika et al. (eds.). Dimensions of iconicity. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 167–90.Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen. 1999. Do signers gesture? In Messing, Lynn and Campbell, Ruth (eds.). Gesture, speech, and sign. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 133–59.Google Scholar
Eriksson, Karl V. 1943. Das Präsens historicum in der nachklassischen griechischen Historiographie. Lund: Ohlsson.Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan. 2013. Language and time: A cognitive linguistics approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanning, Buist M. 1990. Verbal aspect in New Testament Greek. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnell, Lewis R. 1921. Greek hero cults and ideas of immortality. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1984. Espaces mentaux: Aspects de la construction du sens dans les langues naturelles. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994. Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural languages. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. [Translation of Fauconnier, 1984.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Turner, Mark. 2002. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Turner, Mark. 2006. Mental spaces. In Geeraerts, Dirk (ed.). Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings. Berlin: de Gruyter. 303–72.Google Scholar
Finglass, Patrick J. 2007. Sophocles: Electra. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Finglass, Patrick J. 2018. Sophocles: Oedipus the king. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2011. Cognitive iconic grounding of reduplication in language. Semblance and signification 10, 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischl, Johannes. 1910. De nuntiis tragicis. Vienna: F. Deutike.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1986. Evaluation in narrative: The present tense in medieval ‘performed stories’. Yale French Studies 70, 199–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1990. Tense and narrativity: From medieval performance to modern fiction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monika. 1991. The historical present tense yet again: Tense switching and narrative dynamics in oral and quasi-oral storytelling. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 11.3, 365–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fludernik, Monika. 1992. The historical present tense in English literature: An oral pattern and its literary adaptation. Language and Literature 17, 77–107.Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monika. 1996. Towards a ‘natural’ narratology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monika. 2003. Natural narratology and cognitive parameters. In Herman, David (ed.). Narrative theory and the cognitive sciences. Stanford: CSLI. 243–67.Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monika. 2009. An introduction to narratology. London: Routledge. [Translation of 2006. Einführung in die Erzähltheorie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, Eduard. 1950. Aeschylus: Agamemnon (3 vols). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Fretheim, Thorstein, and Gundel, Jeanette K. (eds.). 1996. Reference and referent accessibility. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Coulter H. 2011. (one of ‘quatre excercices’) In Lallot, Jean et al. (eds.). The historical present in Thucydides: Semantics and narrative function. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 251–54.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. 2006. Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1991. Isomorphism in the grammatical code: Cognitive and biological considerations. Studies in language 15.1, 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosselin, Laurent. 2000. Présentation et représentation: Les rôles du ‘présent historique’. Travaux de Linguistique 40, 55–72.Google Scholar
Grethlein, Jonas, and Huitink, Luuk. 2017. Homer’s vividness: An enactive approach. Journal of Hellenic Studies 137, 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry L. (eds.). Syntax and semantics. Volume III: Speech acts. New York: Academic. 41–58.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, Thor. 2007. Action between plot and discourse. Semiotica 165, 295–314.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy and Zacharski, Ron. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69.2, 274–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John. 1980. The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language 56.3, 515–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamburger, Käte. 1968.2 Die Logik der Dichtung. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag.Google Scholar
Hannay, Mike, and Kroon, Caroline H. M.. 2005. Acts and the relationship between discourse and grammar. Functions of language 12.1, 87–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellawell, Steph J., and Brewin, Chris R.. 2004. A comparison of flashbacks and ordinary autobiographical memories of trauma: Content and language. Behaviour Research and Therapy 42.1, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hengeveld, Kees, and Lachlan Mackenzie, J.. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, David. 2007. Cognition, emotion, and consciousness. In Herman, David (ed.). The Cambridge companion to narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 245–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, David. 2009. Basic elements of narrative. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hostetter, Autumn B., and Alibali, Martha W.. 2008. Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 15.3, 495–514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huitink, Luuk. 2019. There was a river on their left-hand side: Xenophon’s Anabasis, reflector narrative and the evolving language of Greek historiography. In Willi, Andreas and Derron, Pascale (eds.). Formes et fonctions des langues littéraires en Grèce ancienne. Vandoeuvres: Fondation Hardt.Google Scholar
Hunt, Arthur S., and Edgar, C. C.. 1932. Select papyri (vol. i). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press/London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shōichi. 1993. Subjectivity in grammar and discourse. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Janni, Pietro. 1984. La mappa e il periplo. Macerata: ItalyGoogle Scholar
Janssen, Theo A. J. M. 1993. Tenses and demonstratives: Conspecific categories. In Geiger, Richard A. and Rudzka-Ostyn, Brygida (eds.). Conceptualizations and mental processing in language. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter. 741–83.Google Scholar
Janssen, Theo A. J. M. 2002. Deictic principles of pronominals, demonstratives, and tenses. In Brisard, Frank (ed.). Grounding: The epistemic footing of deixis and reference. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. 151–93.Google Scholar
Jacquinod, Bernard. 2011. Πείθω et le présent historique chez Thucydide. In Lallot, Jean et al. (eds.). The historical present in Thucydides: Semantics and narrative function. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 89–114.Google Scholar
Jebb, Richard C. 1908.2 Sophocles, the plays and fragments. Part V: The Trachiniae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jebb, Richard C. 1914.5 Sophocles, the plays and fragments. Part I: The Oedipus tyrannus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Jong, Irene J. F. 1991. Narrative in drama: The art of the Euripidean messenger-speech. Leiden and Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, Irene J. F. 2007a. Introduction: Narratological theory on time. In de Jong, Irene J. F. (ed.). Time in ancient Greek literature. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, Irene J. F. 2007b. Sophocles Trachiniae 1–48, Euripidean prologues, and their audiences. In Allan, Rutger J. and Buijs, Michel (eds.). The language of literature: Linguistic approaches to classical texts. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 7–28.Google Scholar
Kemmerer, David. 1999. ‘Near’ and ‘far’ in language and perception. Cognition 73.1, 35–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1968. Tense and mood in Indo-European syntax. Foundations of language 4.1, 30–57.Google Scholar
Klauk, Tobias, and Köppe, Tilmann. 2014. Telling vs. showing. In Hühn, Peter, Meister, Jan C., Pier, John and Schmid, Wolf (eds.). The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University. www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/telling-vs-showing.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Klum, Arne. 1961. Verbe et adverbe: Étude sur le système verbal indicatif et sur le système de certains adverbes de temps à la lumière des relations verbo-adverbiales dans la prose du français contemporain. PhD dissertation, University of Uppsala.Google Scholar
Kok, Kasper I. 2016. The grammatical potential of co-speech gesture. Functions of Language 23.2, 149–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kok, Kasper I. 2017. The status of gesture in cognitive-functional models of grammar. PhD dissertation, Free University Amsterdam (published by Landelijke Onderzoeksschool Taalkunde).Google Scholar
Koller, Hermann. 1951. Praesens historicum und erzählendes Imperfekt: Beitrag zur Aktionsart der Praesensstammzeiten im Lateinischen und Griechischen. Museum Helveticum 8.1, 63–99.Google Scholar
Kroon, Caroline H. M. 2002. How to write a ghost story? A linguistic view on narrative modes in Pliny Ep. 7.27. In Sawicki, Lea and Shalev, Donna (eds.). Donum grammaticum: Studies in Latin and Celtic linguistics in honour of Hannah Rosén. Leuven: Peeters. 189–200.Google Scholar
Kroon, Caroline H. M. 2017. Textual deixis and the ‘anchoring’ use of the Latin pronoun hic. Mnemosyne 70.4, 585–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kühner, Raphael, and Gerth, Bernhard. 1898.3 Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache. Zweiter Teil: Satzlehre (vol. i). Hannover: Hahnsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Kuzmičová, Anezka. 2012a. Fidelity without mimesis: On mental imagery from visual description. In Currie, Gregory, Kot’átko, Petr and Pokorný, Martin (eds). Mimesis: Metaphysics, cognition, pragmatics. London: College Publications. 273–315.Google Scholar
Kuzmičová, Anezka. 2012b. Presence in the reading of literary narrative: A case for motor enactment. Semiotica 189, 23–48.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William, and Waletzky, Joshua. 1967. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In Helm, June (ed.). Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Seattle: University of Washington Press. 12–44.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lallot, Jean. 2011. Vue cavalière sur les emplois du PH dans les Histoires de Thucydide. In Lallot, Jean et al. (eds.). The historical present in Thucydides: Semantics and narrative function. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lallot, Jean, Rijksbaron, Albert, Jacquinod, Bernard and Buijs, Michel (eds.). 2011. The historical present in Thucydides: Semantics and narrative function. Leiden and Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamers, Han, and Rademaker, Adriaan M.. 2007. Talking about myself: A pragmatic approach to the use of aspect forms in Lysias 12.4–19. Classical Quarterly 57.2, 458–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, Frédéric. 2011. Présent historique et subjectivité: Sur quelques exemples de Polybe et de Thucydide. In Lallot, Jean et al. (eds.). The historical present in Thucydides: Semantics and narrative function. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 195–222.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume II: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2009. Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2011. The English present. Temporal coincidence vs. epistemic immediacy. In Patard, Adeline and Brisard, Frank (eds.). Cognitive approaches to tense, aspect and epistemic modality. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 45–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanni, Adriaan. 2006. Law and justice in the courts of Classical Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lautensach, Otto. 1899. Grammatische Studien zu den griechischen Tragikern und Komikern: Augment und Reduplikation. Hannover: Hahnsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Levey, Stephen. 2006. Tense variation in preadolescent narratives. Journal of English Linguistics 34.2, 126–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinsohn, Stephen H. 2016. Verb forms and grounding in narrative. In Runge, Steven E. and Fresch, Christopher J. (eds.). The Greek verb revisited: A fresh approach for biblical exegesis. Bellingham: Lexham. 163–83.Google Scholar
Levinsohn, Stephen H. 2020. The perfect in context in texts in English, Sistani Balochi and New Testament Greek. In Crellin, Robert and Jügel, Thomas (eds.). Perfects in Indo-European languages and beyond. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 615–33.Google Scholar
Lewis, Michael. 1986. The English verb: An exploration of structure and meaning. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.Google Scholar
Lewis-Williams, David. 2002. The mind in the cave: Consciousness and the origins of art. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Liapis, Vayos. 2012. A commentary on the Rhesus attributed to Euripides. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 2003. Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, Scott K., and Metzger, Melanie. 1998. Gesture in sign language discourse. Journal of pragmatics 30.6, 657–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linhares-Dias, Rui. 2011. How to show things with words: A study on logic, language, and literature trends in linguistics. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Loraux, Nicole. 1986. Thucydide a écrit la guerre du Péloponnèse. Mètis 1.1, 139–61.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics: Volume II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacDowell, Douglas M. 1978. The law in Classical Athens. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mandler, Jean M. 1986. On the comprehension of temporal order. Language and Cognitive Processes 1.4, 309–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manne, Sharon. 2002. Language use and post‐traumatic stress symptomatology in parents of pediatric cancer survivors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32.3, 608–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantini, Dante, Perrucci, Mauro G., Del Gratta, D., Romani, Gian-Luca and Corbetta, M.. 2007. Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104, 13170–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, Gunther. 2018. Euripides – ‘Ion’: Edition and commentary. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathewson, David L. 2010. Verbal aspect in the Book of Revelation: The functions of Greek verb tenses in John’s Apocalypse. Leiden and Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matić, Dejan. 2003. Topic, focus, and discourse structure: Ancient Greek word order. Studies in Language 27.3, 573–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, Kenneth L. 1974. Further remarks on the ‘historical’ present and other phenomena. Foundations of Language 11.2, 247–51.Google Scholar
McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago press.Google Scholar
McNeill, David. 2005. Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit, and Tkachman, Oksana. 2014. Iconicity. In Aronoff, Mark (editor in chief). Oxford Bibliographies: Linguistics. www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199772810/obo-9780199772810-0182.xml.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellet, Sylvie. 1998. Présent et présentification: Un problème d’aspect. In Vogeleer, Svetlana, Borillo, Andrée, Vetters, Carl and Vuillaume, Marcel (eds.). Temps et discours. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters. 203–13.Google Scholar
Metzger, Melanie. 1995. Constructed dialogue and constructed action in American Sign Language. In Lucas, Ceil (ed.). Sociolinguistics in deaf communities. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. 255–71.Google Scholar
Mortier-Waldschmidt, Odile. 2011. Τρέπειν au présent historique chez Thucydide. In Lallot, Jean et al. (eds.). The historical present in Thucydides: Semantics and narrative function. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 65–88.Google Scholar
Mulkern, Ann E. 1996. The game of the name. In Fretheim, Thorstein and Gundel, Jeanette K. (eds.). 1996. Reference and referent accessibility. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 235–50.Google Scholar
Munson, Rosaria V. 2015. Natural upheavals in Thucydides (and Herodotus). In Clark, Christina, Foster, Edith and Hallett, Judith P. (eds.). Kinesis: The ancient depiction of gesture, motion, and emotion. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2015. 41–59.Google Scholar
Münte, Thomas F., Schiltz, Kolja and Kutas, Marta. 1998. When temporal terms belie conceptual order. Nature 395.6697, 71–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Napoli, Maria. 2006. Aspect and actionality in Homeric Greek: A contrastive analysis. Milan: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
Nijk, Arjan A. 2013a. A pragmatic account of the use of the historic present in De corona. Mnemosyne 66.3, 365–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijk, Arjan A. 2013b. The rhetorical function of the perfect in Classical Greek. Philologus 157.2, 237–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijk, Arjan A. 2016a. Re-experiencing the past. The praesens pro praeterito in non-narrative discourse in tragedy. Philologus 160.2, 217–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijk, Arjan A. 2016b. How to control the present. A unified account of the nonpast uses of the aorist indicative. Journal of Hellenic Studies 136, 92–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijk, Arjan A. 2018. Iconiciteit als taalkundig anker. Lampas 51.4, 312–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijk, Arjan A. 2019. Bridging the gap between the near and the far. Displacement and representation. Cognitive Linguistics 30.2, 327–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikiforidou, Kiki. 2010. Viewpoint and construction grammar: The case of past + now. Language and Literature 19.3, 265–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikiforidou, Kiki. 2012. The constructional underpinnings of viewpoint blends. In Dancygier, Barbara and Sweetser, Eve (eds.). Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 177–97.Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. 2000. Conversational narrative. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nünning, Ansgar, and Sommer, Roy. 2008. Diegetic and mimetic narrativity: Some further steps towards a narratology of drama. In Pier, John and García Landa, José A. (eds.). Theorizing Narrativity. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter. 331–54.Google Scholar
Oakley, John H., and Sinos, Rebecca H.. 1993. The wedding in Classical Athens. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
O’Kearney, Richard, and Perrott, Kelly. 2006. Trauma narratives in posttraumatic stress disorder: A review. Journal of Traumatic Stress 19.1, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, Douglas S. 2002. Aristophanes: Acharnians. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ooms, Steven, and de Jonge, Casper C.. 2013. The semantics of ἐναγώνιος in Greek literary criticism. Classical Philology 108.2, 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orriens, Sander A. J. 2009. Involving the past in the present: The Classical Greek perfect as a situating cohesion device. In Bakker, Stéphanie J. and Wakker, Gerry C. (eds.). Discourse cohesion in ancient Greek. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 221–39.Google Scholar
Owen, A. S. 1939. Euripides: Ion. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Page, Denys L. 1938. Euripides: Medea. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Park, Lillian, St-Laurent, Marie, McAndrews, Mary P. and Moscovitch, Morris. 2011. The immediacy of recollection: The use of the historical present in narratives of autobiographical episodes by patients with unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuropsychologia 49, 1171–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parrill, Fey. 2012. Interaction between discourse status and viewpoint in co-speech gesture. In Dancygier, Barbara and Sweetser, Eve (eds.). Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrill, Fey, Bergen, Benjamin K. and Lichtenstein, Patricia V.. 2013. Grammatical aspect, gesture, and conceptualization: Using co-speech gesture to reveal event representations. Cognitive Linguistics 24.1, 135–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrill, Fey, and Sweetser, Eve. 2004. What we mean by meaning: Conceptual integration in gesture analysis and transcription. Gesture 4.2, 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Alfred C. 1903. The Helena of Euripides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pecher, Diane, and Zwaan, Rolf A. (eds.). 2005. Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perniss, Pamela, Thompson, Robin L. and Vigliocco, Gabriella. 2010. Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology 1, 227. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3153832/.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perniss, Pamela, and Vigliocco, Gabriella. 2014. The bridge of iconicity: From a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 369, 1651. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25092668.Google Scholar
Perrino, Sabina. 2007. Cross-Chronotype alignment in Senegalese oral narrative. Language and Communication 27, 227–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollak, Wolfgang. 1960. Studien zum ‘Verbalaspekt’ im Französischen. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. 1989. Verbal aspect in the Greek of the New Testament, with reference to tense and mood. New York: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purves, Alex C. 2010. Space and time in ancient Greek narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quasthoff, Uta M. 1980. Erzählen in Gesprächen. Linguistische Untersuchungen zu Strukturen und Funktionen am Beispiel einer Kommunikationsform des Alltags. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Quinto-Pozos, David. 2007. Can constructed action be considered obligatory? Lingua 117, 1285–1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rademaker, Adriaan M., and Buijs, Michel. 2011. A tale of two involuntary encounters: Linguistics and the persuasive function of the historical present in two Thucydidean battle scenes (1.45–51 and 1.56–66). In Lallot, Jean et al. (eds.). The historical present in Thucydides: Semantics and narrative function. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 115–58.Google Scholar
Récanati, François. 1995. Le présent épistolaire: Une perspective cognitive. L’Information grammaticale 66.1, 38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rijksbaron, Albert. 1991. Grammatical observations on Euripides’ Bacchae. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar
Rijksbaron, Albert. 2002.3 The syntax and semantics of the verb in Classical Greek. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar
Rijksbaron, Albert. 2006. On false historic presents in Sophocles (and Euripides). In de Jong, Irene J. F. and Rijksbaron, Albert (eds.). Sophocles and the Greek language: Aspects of diction, syntax and pragmatics. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 127–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rijksbaron, Albert. 2011a. Introduction. In Lallot, Jean et al. (eds.). The historical present in Thucydides: Semantics and narrative function. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 1–18.Google Scholar
Rijksbaron, Albert. 2011b. The profanation of the mysteries and the mutilation of the hermae: Two variations on two themes. In Lallot, Jean et al. (eds.). The historical present in Thucydides: Semantics and narrative function. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 177–94.Google Scholar
Rijksbaron, Albert. 2011c. (one of ‘quatre excercices’) On interpreting γίγνεται in the Archaeology (1.13.4, 1.13.6). In Lallot, Jean et al. (eds.). The historical present in Thucydides: Semantics and narrative function. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 259–61.Google Scholar
Rijksbaron, Albert. 2015. Stative historical presents in Greek tragedy: Are they real? Philologus 159.2, 224–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimmon-Kenan, Schlomith. 1983. Narrative fiction: Contemporary poetics. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robar, Elizabeth. 2016. The historical present in NT Greek: An exercise in interpreting Matthew. In Runge, Steven E. and Fresch, Christopher J. (eds.). The Greek verb revisited: A fresh approach for biblical exegesis. Bellingham: Lexham. 329–52.Google Scholar
Roisman, Hanna, and Luschnig, Celia A. E.. 2011. Euripides’ Electra: A commentary. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Romm, James S. 1992. The edges of the earth in ancient thought: Geography, exploration, and fiction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotstein, Andrea. 2016. Literary History in the Parian Marble. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies. https://chs.harvard.edu/CHS/article/display/6492.andrea-rotstein-literary-history-in-the-parian-marble.Google Scholar
Ruijgh, Cornelis J. 2006. The use of the demonstratives ὅδε, οὗτος and (ἐ)κεῖνος in Sophocles. In de Jong, Irene J. F. and Rijksbaron, Albert (eds.). Sophocles and the Greek language: Aspects of diction, syntax and pragmatics. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 151–61.Google Scholar
Ruipérez, Martín S. 1954. Estructura del sistema de aspectos y tiempos del verbo griego antiguo: Análisis funcional sincrónico. Salamanca: Colegio Trilingũe de la Universidad.Google Scholar
Runge, Steven E. 2010. Discourse grammar of the Greek New Testament: A practical introduction for teaching and exegesis. Peabody: Hendrickson.Google Scholar
Runge, Steven E., and Fresch, Christopher J. (eds.). 2016. The Greek verb revisited: A fresh approach for biblical exegesis. Bellingham: Lexham.Google Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure. 2001. Narrative as virtual reality: Immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic media. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rybarczyk, Magdalena. 2015. Demonstratives and possessives with attitude: An intersubjectively-oriented empirical study. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Ted, Sanders, José and Sweetser, Eve. 2009. Causality, cognition and communication: A mental space analysis of subjectivity in causal connectives. In Sanders, Ted and Sweetser, Eve (eds.). Causal categories in discourse and cognition. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. 19–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1981. Tense Variation in Narrative. Language 57.1, 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuren, Liesbeth. 2014. Shared storytelling in Euripidean stichomythia. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Schwyzer, Eduard, and Debrunner, Albert. 1950. Griechische Grammatik: Auf der Grundlage von Karl Brugmanns griechischer Grammatik. Band 2: Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Seaford, Richard. 1984. Euripides: Cyclops. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Lawrence. 2010. Embodied cognition. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sicking, Christiaan M. J., and van Ophuijsen, Johannes M.. 1993. Two studies in Attic particle usage. Leiden and Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sicking, Christiaan M. J., and Stork, Peter. 1997. The grammar of the so-called ‘historical present’ in ancient Greek. In Bakker, Egbert J. (ed.). Grammar as interpretation: Greek literature in its linguistic contexts. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 131–68.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1983. Tense and aspect in oral Spanish narrative: Context and meaning. Language 59, 760–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slings, Simon R. 1997. Adversative relators between PUSH and POP. In Rijksbaron, Albert (ed.). New approaches to Greek particles. Amsterdam: Gieben. 101–29.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1987. Thinking for speaking. In Aske, Joe, Beery, Natasha, Michaelis, Laura and Filip, Hana (eds.). Papers from the 13th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 435–45.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota S. 2003. Modes of discourse: The local structure of texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerstein, Alan H. 1989. Aeschylus: Eumenides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stanzel, Franz K. 1989.4 Theorie des Erzählens. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Steadman, John M. 1917. The origin of the historical present in English. Studies in Philology 14.1, 1–46.Google Scholar
Stieber, Mary C. 2010. Euripides and the language of craft. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Stirling, Lesley. 2012. Tense/aspect shifting in Kala Lagaw Ya oral narratives. Australian Journal of Linguistics 32.1, 157–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugahara, Takashi, and Hamano, Shoko. 2015. A corpus-based semantic analysis of Japanese mimetic verbs. In Hiraga, Masako K., Herlofsky, William J., Shinohara, Kazuko and Akita, Kimi (eds.). Iconicity: East meets West. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 143–60.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 2013. Creativity across modalities in viewpoint construction. In Borkent, Mike, Dancygier, Barbara and Hinnell, Jennifer (eds.). Language and the creative mind. Stanford: CSLI. 239–54.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve and Fauconnier, Gilles. 1996. Cognitive links and domains: Basic aspects of Mental Space Theory. In Fauconnier, Gilles and Sweetser, Eve (eds.). Spaces, worlds, and grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1–28.Google Scholar
Thoma, Chrystalla A. 2011. The function of the historical present tense: Evidence from modern Greek. Journal of Pragmatics 43.9, 2373–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Rosalind. 1989. Oral tradition and written record in Classical Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timberlake, Alan. 2007.2 Aspect, tense, mood. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.). Language typology and syntactic description. Volume III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 280–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toolan, Michael J. 1988. Narrative. A critical linguistic introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tristram, Hildegard L. C. 1983. Tense and time in early Irish narrative. Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft: Vorträge und kleinere Schriften 32, 5–37.Google Scholar
Troscianko, Emily T. 2014a. Kafka’s cognitive realism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troscianko, Emily T. 2014b. Reading Kafka enactively. Paragraph 37.1, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1981. Episodes as units of discourse analysis. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.). Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 177–95.Google Scholar
van Ess-Dykema, Carol J. 1984. The historical present in oral Spanish narratives. PhD dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
van Krieken, Kobie. 2016. Linguistic viewpoint in crime news narratives: Form, function and impact. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen (published by Landelijke Onderzoeksschool Taalkunde).Google Scholar
van Krieken, Kobie, Sanders, José and Hoeken, Hans. 2016. Blended viewpoints, mediated witnesses: A cognitive linguistic approach to news narratives. In Dancygier, Barbara et al. (eds.). Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter. 145–68.Google Scholar
van Krieken, Kobie, Sanders, José and Sweetser, Eve (eds.). 2019. Time and viewpoint in narrative discourse. Special issue of Cognitive linguistics 30.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. Philosophical Review 66.2, 143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. 1980. Notes on the prologue of Euripides’ Bacchae. Mnemosyne 33.1, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Fritz, Kurt. 1949. The so-called historical present in early Greek. Word 5.2, 186–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuillaume, Marcel. 1990. Grammaire temporelle des récits. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Vuillaume, Marcel. 2008. Maintenant en contexte narratif non-fictionnel. In Vuillaume, Marcel (ed.). Ici et maintenant. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wårvik, Brita. 2004. What is foregrounded in narrative? Hypotheses for the cognitive basis of foregrounding. In Virtanen, Tuija (ed.). Approaches to cognition through text and discourse. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinrich, Harald. 1971.2 Besprochene und erzählte Welt. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
West, Martin L. 1971. Early Greek philosophy and the orient. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
West, Martin L. 1997. The east face of Helicon: West Asiatic elements in Greek poetry and myth. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westbury, Chris, and Moroschan, Gail. 2009. Imageability × phonology interactions during lexical access: Effects of modality, phonological neighbourhood, and phonological processing efficiency. The Mental Lexicon 4.1, 115–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willi, Andreas. 2017. Towards a grammar of narrative voice: From Homeric pragmatics to Hellenistic stylistics. In Slater, Niall W. (ed.). Voice and voices in antiquity. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 233–59.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa. 1978. A feature of performed narrative: The conversational historical present. Language in society 7.2, 215–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa. 1982. CHP: The conversational historical present in American English narrative. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa. 1989. The conversational historical present. Linx 20.1, 135–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Ruey-Jiuan. 2002. Discourse-pragmatic principles for temporal reference in Mandarin Chinese conversation. Studies in Language 26.3, 513–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Suwei. 2018. Multimodality of constructions in Construction Grammars: Transitivity, transitivity alternations, and the dative alternation. PhD dissertation, Free University Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Wyse, William. 1904. The speeches of Isaeus. London: C. J. Clay and Sons.Google Scholar
Young, Rodger C., and Steinmann, Andrew E.. 2012. Correlation of select Classical sources related to the Trojan war with Assyrian and biblical chronologies. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 1.2, 223–48.Google Scholar
Zeman, Sonja. 2013. Vergangenheit als Gegenwart? Zur Diachronie des ‘historischen Präsens’. In Vogel, Petra M. (ed.). Sprachwandel im Neuhochdeutschen. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter. 235–55.Google Scholar
Zirker, Angelika, Bauer, Matthias, Fischer, Olga and Ljungberg, Christian (eds.). 2017. Dimensions of iconicity. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, Rolf A., and Yaxley, Richard H.. 2003. Spatial iconicity affects semantic relatedness judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 10.4, 954–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Arjan A. Nijk, Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, The Netherlands
  • Book: Tense-Switching in Classical Greek
  • Online publication: 27 January 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009042970.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Arjan A. Nijk, Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, The Netherlands
  • Book: Tense-Switching in Classical Greek
  • Online publication: 27 January 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009042970.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Arjan A. Nijk, Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, The Netherlands
  • Book: Tense-Switching in Classical Greek
  • Online publication: 27 January 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009042970.009
Available formats
×