Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:10:54.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Continuum Plasticity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2021

T. W. Clyne
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
J. E. Campbell
Affiliation:
Plastometrex, Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge
Get access

Summary

The handling of stress and strain during elastic deformation is covered in the preceding chapter. However, the situation becomes more complex after the onset of plastic deformation. Whereas elastic straining essentially occurs just via changes in interatomic spacing, the mechanisms involved in plastic (permanent) deformation are far from simple. These mechanisms are described in some detail in the next chapter. The current chapter is based, as is the previous one, on treating the material as a homogeneous continuum, albeit one that may be anisotropic (i.e. exhibit different responses in different directions). Much of the coverage concerns conditions for the onset of plasticity (often described as “yielding”) and subsequent rises in applied stress that are required for further plastic straining (“work hardening”). Two yielding criteria are in common use and these are described. The work-hardening behavior is often quantified using empirical constitutive laws and two of the most prominent of these are also outlined. This chapter also covers the representation of temporal effects – both the changes in stress–strain characteristics that occur when high strain rates are imposed and the progressive straining that can take place over long periods under constant stress, which is often termed “creep.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hosford, WF, Generalized isotropic yield criterion. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1972. 39(2): 607609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, WH, A generalized Von Mises criterion for yield and fracture. Journal of Applied Mechanics: Transactions of the ASME, 1980. 47(2): 297300.Google Scholar
Goo, E and Park, KT, Application of the Von Mises criterion to deformation twinning. Scripta Metallurgica, 1989. 23(7): 10531056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capsoni, A and Corradi, L, Variational formulations for the plane strain elastic–plastic problem for materials governed by the Von Mises criterion. International Journal of Plasticity, 1996. 12(4): 547560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponter, ARS and Engelhardt, M, Shakedown limits for a general yield condition: implementation and application for a Von Mises yield condition. European Journal of Mechanics A: Solids, 2000. 19(3): 423445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagioia, R and Panteghini, A, On the existence of a unique class of yield and failure criteria comprising Tresca, Von Mises, Drucker–Prager, Mohr–Coulomb, Galileo–Rankine, Matsuoka–Nakai and Lade–Duncan. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2016. 472(2185).Google Scholar
Hollomon, JH, Tensile deformation. Transactions of the American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers, 1945. 162: 268290.Google Scholar
Voce, E, The relationship between stress and strain for homogeneous deformation. Journal of the Institute of Metals, 1948. 74(11): 537562.Google Scholar
Zhao, YH, Guo, YZ, Wei, Q, Topping, TD, Dangelewicz, AM, Zhu, YT, Langdon, TG and Lavernia, EJ, Influence of specimen dimensions and strain measurement methods on tensile stress-strain curves. Materials Science and Engineering A: Structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing, 2009. 525(1–2): 6877.Google Scholar
Arrayago, I, Real, E and Gardner, L, Description of stress–strain curves for stainless steel alloys. Materials & Design, 2015. 87: 540552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umbrello, D, M’Saoubi, R and Outeiro, JC, The influence of Johnson–Cook material constants on finite element simulation of machining of AISI 316L steel. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2007. 47(3–4): 462470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, GR and Cook, WH, A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures, in Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, 1983. 21: 541547.Google Scholar
Molinari, A and Ravichandran, G, Fundamental structure of steady plastic shock waves in metals. Journal of Applied Physics, 2004. 95(4): 17181732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rule, WK and Jones, SE, A revised form for the Johnson–Cook strength model. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1998. 21(8): 609624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, YC, Chen, XM and Liu, G, A modified Johnson–Cook model for tensile behaviors of typical high-strength alloy steel. Materials Science and Engineering A: Structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing, 2010. 527(26): 69806986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, A, Xie, GL, Zhang, HL and Wang, XT, A comparative study on Johnson–Cook, modified Johnson–Cook and Arrhenius-type constitutive models to predict the high temperature flow stress in 20CrMo alloy steel. Materials & Design, 2013. 52: 677685.Google Scholar
Manes, A, Peroni, L, Scapin, M and Giglio, M, Analysis of strain rate behavior of an A1 6061 T6 alloy, in 11th International Conference on the Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Guagliano, M and Vergani, L, eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2011, pp. 34773482.Google Scholar
Roberto-Pereira, FF, Campbell, JE, Dean, J and Clyne, TW, Extraction of superelasticity parameter values from instrumented indentation via iterative FEM modelling. Mechanics of Materials, 2019. 134: 143152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clyne, TW and Hull, D, An Introduction to Composite Materials. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Meguid, SA, Shagal, G, Stranart, JC and Daly, J, Three-dimensional dynamic finite element analysis of shot-peening induced residual stresses. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 1999. 31(3): 179191.Google Scholar
Hong, T, Ooi, JY and Shaw, B, A numerical simulation to relate the shot peening parameters to the induced residual stresses. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2008. 15(8): 10971110.Google Scholar
You, C, Achintha, M, Soady, KA, Smyth, N, Fitzpatrick, ME and Reed, PAS, Low cycle fatigue life prediction in shot-peened components of different geometries, part I: residual stress relaxation. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 2017. 40(5): 761775.Google Scholar
Guan, J, Wang, LQ, Mao, YZ, Shi, XJ, Ma, XX and Hu, B, A continuum damage mechanics based approach to damage evolution of M50 bearing steel considering residual stress induced by shot peening. Tribology International, 2018. 126: 218228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burley, M, Campbell, JE, Dean, J and Clyne, TW, Johnson–Cook parameter evaluation from ballistic impact data via iterative FEM modelling. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2018. 112: 180192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×