Book contents
- Theories of International Responsibility Law
- ASIL Studies in International Legal Theory
- Theories of International Responsibility Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Theorizing International Responsibility Law, an Introduction
- Part I International Responsibility of Public Institutions: Public and/or Private?
- Part II International Responsibility of Public Institutions: Collective and/or Individual?
- Part III International Responsibility of Public Institutions: Fault-based or Not?
- Part IV Responsibility of Public Institutions: A World Tour
- 12 The Responsibility of Public Authorities in China
- 13 Liability of Public Institutions in Middle Eastern Law
- 14 The Responsibility of Public Institutions in Africa
- 15 State Responsibility from a Central European Perspective
- 16 Comparative and Prospective Comments on the ‘World Tour’ of the Concept of Public Responsibility
- Conclusion
- Index
12 - The Responsibility of Public Authorities in China
from Part IV - Responsibility of Public Institutions: A World Tour
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 September 2022
- Theories of International Responsibility Law
- ASIL Studies in International Legal Theory
- Theories of International Responsibility Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Theorizing International Responsibility Law, an Introduction
- Part I International Responsibility of Public Institutions: Public and/or Private?
- Part II International Responsibility of Public Institutions: Collective and/or Individual?
- Part III International Responsibility of Public Institutions: Fault-based or Not?
- Part IV Responsibility of Public Institutions: A World Tour
- 12 The Responsibility of Public Authorities in China
- 13 Liability of Public Institutions in Middle Eastern Law
- 14 The Responsibility of Public Institutions in Africa
- 15 State Responsibility from a Central European Perspective
- 16 Comparative and Prospective Comments on the ‘World Tour’ of the Concept of Public Responsibility
- Conclusion
- Index
Summary
This chapter explains how, in the wake of the reforms implemented since the early 1980s and the desire to provide a legal framework for State action, successive statutes have laid the foundations for a system of responsibility of public authorities in the People’s Republic of China. Despite the establishment of mechanisms to enforce State responsibility, the system still suffers from a number of shortcomings. Some are inherent in the reluctance of any State to be held responsible; others are more specific and outline the contours of a regime of responsibility specific to China at a time when the country wishes to assert a government model to compete with liberal democracy. In the background, a regime of political rather than legal responsibility has emerged, which both limits the obstacles to public action (in order to ensure efficiency) and emphasizes the government’s duty to ensure common prosperity. The report examines the Chinese bureaucratic culture, its history and the specificities of the current political system to explain the origin of this specifically Chinese conception of the responsibility of public authorities.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Theories of International Responsibility Law , pp. 279 - 290Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022