Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-h6jzd Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-03-01T06:20:43.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Impact Dynamics in a Continuous-Time Double Auction

from PART VIII - MARKET DYNAMICS AT THE MESO-SCALE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2018

Jean-Philippe Bouchaud ,
Julius Bonart ,
Jonathan Donier  and
Martin Gould
Jean-Philippe Bouchaud
Affiliation:
Capital Fund Management, Paris
Julius Bonart
Affiliation:
University College London
Jonathan Donier
Affiliation:
Capital Fund Management
Martin Gould
Affiliation:
CFM - Imperial Institute of Quantitative Finance
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Trades, Quotes and Prices
Financial Markets Under the Microscope
 , pp. 354 - 365
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Donier, J., Bonart, J., Mastromatteo, I., & Bouchaud, J. P. (2015). A fully consistent, minimal model for non-linear market impact. Quantitative Finance, 15(7), 1109–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasry, J. M., & Lions, P. L. (2007). Mean field games. Japanese Journal of Mathematics, 2(1), 229–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obizhaeva, A. A., & Wang, J. (2013). Optimal trading strategy and supply/demand dynamics. Journal of Financial Markets, 16(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, X., Dai, J. G., Dieker, T., & Deng, S. (2016). Hydrodynamic limit of order book dynamics. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences, 1–30.
Lachapelle, A., Lasry, J. M., Lehalle, C. A., & Lions, P. L. (2016). Efficiency of the price formation process in presence of high frequency participants: A mean field game analysis. Mathematics and Financial Economics, 10(3), 223–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkema, G. T., Howard, M. J., & Cardy, J. L. (1996). Reaction-diffusion front for A + B → in one dimension. Physical Review E, 53(3), R2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bak, P., Paczuski, M., & Shubik, M. (1997). Price variations in a stock market with many agents. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 246(3–4), 430–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, L. H., & Tian, G. S. (1999). Reaction-diffusion-branching models of stock price fluctuations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 264(3), 543–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moro, E., Vicente, J., Moyano, L. G., Gerig, A., Farmer, J. D., Vaglica, G., & Mantegna, R. N. (2009). Market impact and trading profile of hidden orders in stock markets. Physical Review E, 80(6), 066102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bershova, N., & Rakhlin, D. (2013). The non-linear market impact of large trades: Evidence from buy-side order flow. Quantitative Finance, 13(11), 1759–1778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brokmann, X., Serie, E., Kockelkoren, J., & Bouchaud, J. P. (2015). Slow decay of impact in equity markets. Market Microstructure and Liquidity, 1(02), 1550007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, C., & Waelbroeck, H. (2015). Is market impact a measure of the information value of trades?Market response to liquidity vs. informed metaorders. Quantitative Finance, 15(5), 773–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huberman, G., & Stanzl, W. (2004). Price manipulation and quasi-arbitrage. Econometrica, 72(4), 1247–1275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alfonsi, A., & Schied, A. (2010). Optimal trade execution and absence of price manipulations in limit order book models. SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, 1(1), 490–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatheral, J. (2010). No-dynamic-arbitrage and market impact. Quantitative Finance, 10(7), 749–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatheral, J., Schied, A., & Slynko, A. (2012). Transient linear price impact and Fredholm integral equations. Mathematical Finance, 22(3), 445–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×