Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T02:23:09.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - The mountain tapir (Tapirus pinchaque) and Andean bear (Tremarctos ornatus): two charismatic, large mammals in South American tropical montane cloud forests

from Part II - Regional floristic and animal diversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2011

By
J. Cavelier ,
D. Lizcano ,
E. Yerena  and
C. Downer
Edited by
L. A. Bruijnzeel ,
F. N. Scatena  and
L. S. Hamilton
J. Cavelier
Affiliation:
The Global Environmental Facility, USA
D. Lizcano
Affiliation:
University of Kent, UK
E. Yerena
Affiliation:
Universidad Simón Bolívar, Venezuela
C. Downer
Affiliation:
Andean Tapir Fund, USA
L. A. Bruijnzeel
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
F. N. Scatena
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
L. S. Hamilton
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

ABSTRACT

Mountain tapir and Andean bear are the two largest mammals in the tropical Andes, both charismatic, survivors of old lineages of mammal evolution, and threatened with extinction. Their current distribution is montane cloud forest and páramos (high-altitude grasslands) in South America, where they feed on fruits and vegetative parts, having an important role as seed dispersers. The distribution and population size of both species was analyzed based on expert opinion and a rule-and-base model within a GIS context. A gap analysis was performed to determine the animals their conservation status within National Parks. Areas of past and present distribution for the mountain tapir were 205 000 km2 and 31 400 km2, respectively. Based on existing suitable habitat, the population of mountain tapirs in their current range was estimated at 5700 individuals at the most. The overall population of Andean bears ranges between expert estimates of 5000–10 000 individuals. Several conservation recommendations emerge from the present analysis and review for the two species.

INTRODUCTION

The tropical cloud forests of the Andean region support some of the greatest plant and animal species diversity on Earth (Rahbek and Graves 2001; Barthlott et al., 2005; Brehm et al., 2005; Krömer et al., 2005), with a remarkable number of endemic and rare species (Duellman, 1988; Kessler, 2002; Kattan and Franco, 2004). At the same time, the tropical Andes is one of the most endangered biodiversity “hot spots” (Myers et al., 2000; Brooks et al., 2002; cf. Mosandl et al., 2008) due primarily to the conversion of forests to agriculture and cattle ranching, a process that continues today (Kattan et al., 2004).

Type
Chapter
Information
Tropical Montane Cloud Forests
Science for Conservation and Management
 , pp. 172 - 181
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acosta, H., Cavelier, J., and Londoño, S. (1996). Aportes al conocimiento de la biología de la danta de montaña, Tapirus pinchaque, en los Andes Centrales de Colombia. Biotropica 28: 258–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashley, M. V., Norman, J. E., and Stross, L. (1996). Phylogenetic analysis of the perissodactylan family Tapiridae using mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase (COII) sequences. Journal of Mammalian Evolution 3: 315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthlott, W., Mutke, J., Rafiqpoor, M. D., Kier, G., and Kreft, H. (2005). Global centres of vascular plant diversity. Nova Acta Leopoldina, Neue Folge 92, 342: 61–83.Google Scholar
Brehm, G., Pitkin, L. M., Hilt, N., and Fiedler, K. (2005). Montane Andean rain forests are a global diversity hotspot of geometrid moths. Journal of Biogeography 32:1621–1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, K. M., Bodmer, R. E., and Matola, S. (1997). Tapirs, Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. Gland Switzerland: IUCN/SSC Tapir Specialist Group.Google Scholar
Brooks, T. M., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., et al. (2002). Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conservation Biology 16: 909–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buytaert, W. (2004). The properties of the soils of the South Ecuadorian páramo and the impact of land use changes on their hydrology. Ph.D. thesis, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
Buytaert, W., Célleri, R., Bièvre, B., et al. (2006). Human impact on the hydroloogy of the Andean páramos. Earth Science Reviews 79: 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellanos, A. (2003). Ecology of re-introduced Andean bears in the Maquipucuna Biological Reserve, Ecuador: conservation implications. Re-introduction News 23: 32–34.Google Scholar
Castellanos, A. (2004). Andean bear research project in the Intag region, Ecuador. International Bear News 13: 25–26.Google Scholar
Cavelier, J., and Etter, A. (1995). Deforestation of montane forest in Colombia as result of illegal plantations of opium (Papaver somniferum). In Biodiversity and Conservation of Neotropical Montane Forest, eds. Churchill, S. P., Balslev, H., Forero, E., and Luteyn, J. L., pp. 125–137. New York: New York Botanical Garden.Google Scholar
Davis, D. D. (1955). Masticatory apparatus in the spectacled bear (Tremarctos ornatus). Fieldiana: Zoology 37: 25–46.Google Scholar
Dierenfeld, E. (1988). Nutritional consideration in feeding the captive spectacled bear. In Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on the Spectacled Bear, ed. Rosenthal, M., pp. 114–130. Chicago, IL: Chicago Park District Press.Google Scholar
Downer, C. C. (1996). The mountain tapir, endangered “flagship” species of the high Andes. Oryx 30: 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downer, C. C. (1997). Status and action plan of the mountain tapir (Tapirus pinchaque). In Tapirs, Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan, eds. Brooks, D. M., Bodmer, R. E., and Matola, S., pp. 10–22. Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK: IUCN/SSC Tapir Specialist Group.Google Scholar
Downer, C. C. (1999). Un caso de mutualismo en los Andes: observaciones sobre dieta-habitat del tapir de montaña. In Manejo y conservacion de fauna silvestre en America Latina, Parte VII, eds. Fang, T. G., Montenegro, O., and Bodmer, R., pp. 415–427. La Paz, Bolivia: Wildlife Conservation Society and Instituto de Ecologia.Google Scholar
Downer, C. C. (2001). Observations on the diet and habitat of the mountain tapir (Tapirus pinchaque). Journal of Zoology, London 254: 279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downer, C. C. (2002). Ambito hogareño y utilización de hábitat del Tapir Andino e ingreso de ganado en el Parque Nacional Sangay, Ecuador. Proceedings of the Conference on Biodiversity: Andean and Amazonian, (Sept. (2001)). Munich, Germany and Cuzco, Perú: INKA.Google Scholar
Duellman, W. E. (1988). Patterns of species diversity in the anuran amphibians in the American tropics. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 75: 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueroa, J., and Stucchi, M. (2002). Situación actual del oso Andino en el Santuario Histórico de Machu Picchu (Cuzco, Perú). Lima, Perú: Informe a PROFANPE/GTZ.Google Scholar
Foerster, C. R. (2001). Results of a five-year telemetry study of Baird's tapir in Costa Rica. In Proceedings of the 1st International Tapir Symposium, Nov. (2001), ed. Medici, P., 9–10. San José, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
Foerster, C. R., and Vaughan, C. (2002). Home range, habitat use, and activity of Baird's tapir in Costa Rica. Biotropica 34: 423–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frison, G. C. (1998). Paleoindian large mammal hunters on the plains of North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95: 14 576–14 583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, I. (1990). Distribución y hábitos alimentarios del oso frontino, Tremarctos ornatus, en Venezuela. M.Sc. thesis, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Caracas, Venezuela.Google Scholar
Goldstein, I. (1991). Spectacled bear predation and feeding behavior on livestock in Venezuela. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 26: 231–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harestad, A. S., and Bunnel, F. L. (1979). Home range and body weight: a re-evaluation. Ecology 60: 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershkovitz, P. (1954). Mammals of northern Colombia, preliminary report No. 7: Tapirs (genus Tapirus), with a systematic review of American species. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 103 (3329): 465–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbrook, L. T. (1999). The phylogeny and classification of tapiromorph perissodactyls (Mammalia). Cladistics 15: 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,IGAC, Instituto Geografico Agustin Codazzi (1996). Diccionario geográfico de Colombia, CD-ROM edn. Bogotá, Colombia: IGAC.
,IUCN (2006). Red List of Threatened Species. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/SSC.
Kattan, G. H., and Franco, P. (2004). Bird diversity along elevational gradients in the Andes of Colombia: area and mass effects. Global Ecology and Biogeography 13: 451–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kattan, G. H, Hernández, O. L., Goldstein, I., et al. (2004). Range fragmentation in the spectacled bear Tremarctos ornatus in the northern Andes. Oryx 38: 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, M. (2002). The elevational gradient of Andean plant endemism: varying influences of taxon-specific traits and topography at different taxonomic levels. Journal of Biogeography 29: 1159–1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krömer, T., Kessler, M., Gradstein, S. R., and Acebey, A. (2005). Diversity patterns of vascular epiphytes along an elevational gradient in the Andes. Journal of Biogeography 32: 1799–1809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lizcano, D. J. (1996). Densidad poblacional y disponibilidad de hábitat de la danta de montaña (Tapirus pinchaque) en el Parque Regional Natural Ucumari y el Parque Nacional Natural los Nevados. B.Sc. thesis. Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.Google Scholar
Lizcano, D. J., and Cavelier, J. (2000a). Densidad poblacional y disponibilidad de hábitat de la danta de montaña (Tapirus pinchaque) en los Andes Centrales de Colombia. Biotropica 31: 165–173.Google Scholar
Lizcano, D. J., and Cavelier, J. (2000b). Daily and seasonal activity of the mountain tapir (Tapirus pinchaque) in the Central Andes of Colombia. Journal of Zoology, London 252: 429–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lizcano, D. J., and Cavelier, J.. (2004). Características químicas de salados y hábitos alimenticios de la danta de montaña (Tapirus pinchaque Roulin, 1829) en los Andes Centrales de Colombia. Mastozoologia Neotropical 11: 193–201.Google Scholar
Lizcano, D. J., and Sissa, A. (2003). Notes on the distribution and conservation status of mountain tapir (Tapirus pinchaque) in North Peru. Tapir Conservation 12: 21–24.Google Scholar
Lizcano, D. J., Pizarro, V., Cavelier, J., and Carmona, J.. (2002). Geographic distribution and population size of the mountain tapir (Tapirus pinchaque) in Colombia. Journal of Biogeography 29: 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondolfi, E. (1989). Notes on the distribution, habitat, food habits, status and conservation of the Spectacled Bear (Tremarctos ornatus Cuvier) in Venezuela. Mammalia 53: 525–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosandl, R., Günter, S., Stimm, B., and Weber, M. (2008). Ecuador suffers the highest deforestation rate in South America. In Gradients in a Tropical Mountain Ecosystem of Ecuador, eds. Beck, E., Bendix, J., Kottke, I., Makeschin, F., and Mosandl, R., pp. 37–40. Berlin: Springer-VerlagCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Fonseca, G. A. B. da, and Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nash, W. G., and O'Brien, S. J. (1987). A comparative chromosome banding analysis of the Ursidae and their relationship to other carnivores. Cytogenetics Cell Genetics 45: 206–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Brien, S. J., Nash, W. G., Wildt, D. E., Bush, M. E., and Benveniste, R. E. (1985). A molecular solution to the riddle of the giant panda's phylogeny. Nature 317: 140–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orejuela, J., and Jorgenson, J. (1999). Status and management of the spectacled bear in Colombia. In Bears, Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan, eds. Servheen, C., Herrero, S., and Peyton, B., pp. 168–179. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/SSC Bear and Polar Bear Specialist Groups.Google Scholar
Paisley, S. (2001). Andean bears and people in Apolobamba, Bolivia: culture, conflict and conservation. Ph.D. thesis. Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.Google Scholar
Paisley, S., and Garshelis, D. L. (2006). Activity patterns and time budgets of Andean bears (Tremarctos ornatus) in the Apolobamba Range of Bolivia. Journal of Zoology, London 268: 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peyton, B. (1980). Ecology, distribution and food habits of spectacled bears, Tremarctos ornatus in Peru. Journal of Mammalogy 61: 639–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peyton, B. (1981). Spectacled bears in Peru. Oryx 16: 48–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peyton, B. (1987). Habitat components of the spectacled bear. International Conference on Bear Research and Management 7: 127–133.Google Scholar
Peyton, B. (1999). Status and management of the spectacled bear in Perú. In Bears: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan, eds. Servheen, C., Herrero, S., and Peyton, B., pp. 182–193. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/SSC Bear and Polar Bear Specialist Groups.Google Scholar
Poveda, F. (1986). El Oso Andino, especie para conservar. Carta Ganadera, Colombia 23: 37–43.Google Scholar
Prothero, D. R., and Schoch, R. M. (1989). Classification of the Perissodactyla. In The Evolution of Perissodactyls, eds. Prothero, R. D. and Schoch, R. M., pp. 530–537. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rahbek, C., and Graves, G. (2001). Multiscale assessment of patterns of avian species richness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 98: 4534–4539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rechberger, J., Wallace, R., and Ticona, H. (2001). Un movimiento de larga distancia de un oso andino (Tremarctos ornatus) en el norte del Departamento de La Paz, Bolivia. Ecologia en Bolivia 36: 73–74.Google Scholar
Rios-Uzeda, B., Gomez, H., and Wallace, R. B. (2006). Habitat preferences of the Andean bear (Tremarctos ornatus) in the Bolivian Andes. Journal of Zoology, London 271: 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivadeneira-Canedo, C. (2008). Study of the Andean bear (Tremarctos ornatus) as a legitimate seed disperser and elements of its diet in the region of Apolobamba–Bolivia. Ecología en Bolivia 43: 29–39.Google Scholar
Robinson, J., and Redford, K.. (1986) Body size, diet and population density of Neotropical forest mammals. American Naturalist 128: 665–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, D. (1991). Evaluación del hábitat del oso de anteojos (Tremarctos ornatus) en el P.N.N. Las Orquídeas. B.Sc. thesis, Universidad Nacional, Bogotá, Colombia.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, D. (2001). Programa nacional para la conservación y recuperación del oso andino (Tremarctos ornatus) especie amenazada de los ecosistemas andinos colombianos. Bogotá, Colombia: Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, Subdirección de Ecosistemas.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, D., Cuesta, F., Goldstein, I., et al. (2003). Estrategia ecorregional para la conservación del oso andino en Los Andes del Norte. Bogotá, Colombia: WWF-Colombia, Fundación Wii, EcoCiencia, WCS.Google Scholar
Roth, H. H. (1964). Ein beitrag zur Kenntnis von Tremarctos ornatus (Cuvier). Zoological Garten 29: 107–129.Google Scholar
Ruiz-García, M., Orozco-terWengel, P., Castellanos, A., and Arias, L. (2005). Microsatellite analysis of the spectacled bear (Tremarctos ornatus) across its range distribution. Genes and Genetic Systems 80: 57–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rumiz, D., and Salazar, J. (1999). Status and management of the spectacled bear in Bolivia. In Bears: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan, eds. Servheen, C., Herrero, S., and Peyton, B., pp. 164–168. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/SSC Bear and Polar Bear Specialist Groups.Google Scholar
Rumiz, D., Eulert, C., and Arispe, R. (1999). Situación del oso andino en los Parques nacionales Amboro y Carrasco, Bolivia. In Manejo y conservación de Fauna Silvestre en America Latina, eds. Fang, T., Montenegro, O., and Bodmer, R. E., pp. 375–382. La Paz, Bolivia: Instituto de Ecología.Google Scholar
Schauenberg, P. (1969). Contribution à l'étude du Tapir pinchaque, Tapirus pinchaque Roulin 1829. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 76: 211–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoch, R. M. (1989). A brief historical review of perissodactyl classification. In The Evolution of Perissodactyls, eds. Prothero, D. R. and Schoch, R. M., pp. 13–25. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Soibelzon, L. H., Tonni, E. P., and Bond, M. (2005). The fossil record of South American short-faced bears (Ursidae, Tremarctinae). Journal of South American Earth Sciences 20: 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suárez, L. (1985). Hábitos alimenticios y distribución estacional del oso de anteojos (Tremarctos ornatus) en el páramo suroriental del Volcán Antisana, Ecuador. B.Sc. thesis, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, EcuadorGoogle Scholar
Suárez, L. (1999). Status and management of the spectacled bear in Ecuador. In Bears: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan, eds. Servheen, C., Herrero, S., and Peyton, B., pp. 179–182. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/SSC Bear and Polar Bear Specialist Groups.Google Scholar
Talbot, S., and Shields, G. (1996). A phylogeny of the bears (Ursidae) inferred from complete sequences of three mitochondrial genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 5: 567–575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thenius, E. (1976). Zur stammesgeschichtlichen Herfunft von Tremarctos (Ursidae, Mammalia). Zeitschrift für Saugetierkunde 41: 109–114.Google Scholar
Hammen, T. (1982). Paleoecology of Tropical South America. In Biological Diversification in the Tropics, ed. Prance, G. T., pp. 60–67. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Velasco, E. (1991). Distribución y uso de la fauna paramuna en los departamentos del Valle y Cauca, Colombia. M.Sc. thesis, Universidad Nacional, Heredia, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
Yerena, E. (1994). Corredores ecológicos en los Andes Venezolanos. In Parques Nacionales y Conservación Ambiental, No. 4, eds. , S., and Amend, T., pp. 80–87. Caracas, Venezuela: Editorial Torino.Google Scholar
Yerena, L. (1999). Status and management of the spectacled bear in Venezuela. In Bears: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan, eds. Servheen, C., Herrero, S., and Peyton, B., pp. 193–198. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/SSC Bear and Polar Bear Specialist Groups.Google Scholar
Yerena, E., and Torres, D. (1994). Spectacled bear conservation and dispersal corridors in Venezuela. International Conference of Bear Research and Management 9: 169–172.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×