Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:12:09.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Derivation and abstractness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2012

Martin Krämer
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Tromsø, Norway
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In the development of generative phonology from structuralism the most dramatic shift in paradigm was the focus on a transformational component that turned underlying highly abstract representations into surface representations with all feature values present. As noted in the previous chapter, morphophonological alternations were built into the representations in earlier models, which caused the representations to become somewhat complex, while generalizations got lost and the distinctive features became increasingly abstract since their phonetic derivatives had to be defined in relation to phonetic context. Moreover, structuralism distinguished the lexical representation from a phonemic or archiphonemic level, the one that includes the alternation space of a phoneme, i.e., its allophones. Furthermore, the biuniqueness condition was proven to be an inappropriate condition on the relation between allophones and phonemes. It was these two theoretical assumptions, the archiphonemic level and biuniqueness, that were challenged by early generative studies and replaced by an apparatus of ordered rules that freely transform a phoneme into its contextual allophones.

The transformational component also took over some changes of a historical nature. Saussure’s strict separation of diachrony and synchrony, already criticized by Jakobson, got even more blurred. Accordingly, the machinery was used to establish underlying representations that were far removed from surface structures and linked to them by an intricate system of transformational rules. In this chapter we examine the development of this rule component and the effect these rules had on what was believed about underlying representations. These rules were basically of two types, proper phonological rules, which capture phonological alternations in morphological paradigms and which are expected to be of maximal generality, and redundancy rules, which capture static patterns, speaker intuitions on well-formedness that cannot be boiled down to proper phonological rules, and which supply feature values for predictable features or unmarked values.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chomsky, NoamHalle, Morris 1968
Clayton, Mary L. 1976 The redundance of underlying morpheme-structure conditionsLanguage 52 295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan 1981 Recoverability, abstractness and phonotactic constraintsGoyvaerts, Didier L.Phonology in the 1980’sGhentE. Story-Scientia469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul 1968 How Abstract Is Phonology?DordrechtForisGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul 1973 Phonological representationsFujimura, OsamuThree Dimensions of Linguistic TheoryTokyoTEC3Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole 1993 On the validity of morpheme structure constraintsCanadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 38 235CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Derivation and abstractness
  • Martin Krämer, Universitetet i Tromsø, Norway
  • Book: Underlying Representations
  • Online publication: 05 November 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978821.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Derivation and abstractness
  • Martin Krämer, Universitetet i Tromsø, Norway
  • Book: Underlying Representations
  • Online publication: 05 November 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978821.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Derivation and abstractness
  • Martin Krämer, Universitetet i Tromsø, Norway
  • Book: Underlying Representations
  • Online publication: 05 November 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978821.003
Available formats
×