Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:31:20.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2019

C. H. Tham
C. H. Tham
Affiliation:
Singapore Management University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Understanding the Law of Assignment , pp. 456 - 467
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ames, J, ‘Purchase for Value without Notice’ (1887) 1 Harv L Rev 1.Google Scholar
Ames, J, ‘The Disseisin of Chattels ‒ Part III’ (1890) 3 Harv L Rev 337.Google Scholar
Ames, J, ‘Disseisin of Chattels’, in Select Essays in Anglo-American Legal History, vol. III (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1909).Google Scholar
Ames, J, ‘The Inalienability of Choses in Action’ in Lectures on Legal History and Miscellaneous Legal Essays (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1913).Google Scholar
Ames, J, Lectures on Legal History and Miscellaneous Legal Essays (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1913).Google Scholar
Anderson, RG, Assignation (Edinburgh: Edinburgh Legal Education Trust, 2008).Google Scholar
Ashburner, W, Ashburner’s Principles of Equity (Browne, D, ed., 2nd edn, London: Butterworth & Co., 1933).Google Scholar
Austin, J, Lectures on Jurisprudence, or, The Philosophy of Positive Law (Campbell, R, ed., 5th edn, London: John Murray, 1885).Google Scholar
Bailey, S, ‘Assignments of Debts in England from the Twelfth to the Twentieth Century ‒ Part III’ (1932) 48 LQR 547.Google Scholar
Baker, PV, ‘Case Note on Grey v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1958] 2 WLR 168’ (1958) 74 LQR 180.Google Scholar
Ballow, H, A Treatise of Equity: With the Addition of Marginal References and Notes (Fonblanque, J, ed., 5th edn, London: J & WT Clarke, 1820).Google Scholar
Battersby, G, ‘Formalities for the Disposition of Equitable Interests under a Trust’ [1979] Conveyancer 17.Google Scholar
Baxendale-Walker, P, Purpose Trusts (London: Butterworths, 1999).Google Scholar
Beale, H, Bridge, M, Gullifer, L and Lomnicka, E, The Law of Security and Title-Based Financing (3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Beale, H, Gullifer, L and Paterson, S, ‘A Case for Interfering with Freedom of Contract? An Empirically-Informed Study of Bans on Assignment’ [2016] JBL 203.Google Scholar
Berlin, I, ‘John Stuart Mill and the Ends of Life’, in Gray, J and Smith, GW (eds.), JS Mill, on Liberty, in Focus (London: Routledge, 1991).Google Scholar
Birks, P, ‘Fictions, Ancient and Modern’, in MacCormick, N and Birks, P (eds.), The Legal Mind: Essays for Tony Honoré (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Birks, P, ‘Equity in the Modern Law: An Exercise in Taxonomy’ (1996) 26 UWALR 1.Google Scholar
Birks, P, ‘Rights, Wrongs and Remedies’ (2000) 10 OJLS 1.Google Scholar
Birss, , The Honourable Mr Justice (ed.), Terrell on the Law of Patents (18th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuters, 2016).Google Scholar
Blackburn, S, Ethics: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Blackstone, W, Commentaries on the Laws of England, Volume I: Of the Rights of Persons (1st edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1765).Google Scholar
Blom-Cooper, L, ‘1966 and All That: The Story of the Practice Statement’, in Blom-Cooper, L, Dickson, B and Drewry, G (eds.), The Judicial House of Lords 1876–2009 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Bridge, MG, The Law of Personal Property (1st edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2013).Google Scholar
Bridge, MG, Personal Property Law (4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Bridge, MG, ‘The Nature of Assignment and Non-assignment Clauses’ (2016) 132 LQR 47.Google Scholar
Bridge, MG, Gullifer, L, Low, KFK and McMeel, G, The Law of Personal Property (2nd edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2018).Google Scholar
Brodhurst, S, ‘Is Copyright a Chose in Action?’ (1895) 11 LQR 64.Google Scholar
Brown, I (ed.), The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary: On Historical Principles (4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Blackstone, W, Commentaries on the Laws of England, Volume II: Of the Rights of Things (1st edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1766).Google Scholar
Bullen, RJ, ‘The Rights of Strangers to Contracts Under Seal’ (1977) 6 Adelaide Law Review 119.Google Scholar
Butler, C (ed.), The First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England, or, A Commentary upon Littleton: Not the Name of the Author Only, but of the Law Itself (19th edn, London: J & WT Clarke, 1832) (‘Coke on Littleton’).Google Scholar
Calnan, R, Taking Security (4th edn, London: LexisNexis, 2018).Google Scholar
Calvert, F, A Treatise upon the Law Respecting Parties to Suits in Equity (2nd edn, London: William Benning & Co., 1847).Google Scholar
Chitty, J, Chitty on Contracts (2 vols., Beale, HG, Gen. ed., 33rd edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters, 2018).Google Scholar
Clarke, MR Sir A, ‘Claims against Professionals: Negligence, Dishonesty and Fraud’ [2006] Professional Negligence 70.Google Scholar
Clerk, J and Lindsell, W, Clerk & Lindsell on Torts (Jones, M, ed., 22nd edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters, 2018).Google Scholar
Commissioners on the Judicature, First to Fifth Reports of the Commissioners on the Judicature: With Minutes of Evidence and Appendices, 1868‒74, vol. 13 (Shannon: Irish University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Cook, WW, ‘The Alienability of Choses in Action ‒ Part II’ (1917) 30 Harvard Law Review 449.Google Scholar
Coote, B, ‘The Performance Interest, Panatown, and the Problem of Loss’ (2001) 117 LQR 81.Google Scholar
Copinger, WA, Copinger and Skone James on Copyright, vol. 1 (Davies, G, Caddick, N and Harbottle, G, eds., 17th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2016).Google Scholar
Corbin, AL, ‘Assignment of Contract Rights’ (1926) 74 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 207.Google Scholar
Crossley Vaines, J, Crossley Vaines’ Personal Property (Tyler, ELG and Palmer, NE, eds., 5th edn, Oxford: Butterworths, 1973).Google Scholar
Cutts, T, ‘The Nature of “Equitable Property”: A Functional Analysis’ (2012) 6 Journal of Equity 44.Google Scholar
Davies, PS, Accessory Liability (Oxford: Hart, 2015).Google Scholar
Dicey, AV, A Digest of the Law of England with Reference to the Conflict of Laws (London: Stevens and Sons, 1896).Google Scholar
Dietrich, J, ‘The Liability of Accessories under Statute, in Equity, and in Criminal Law: Some Common Problems and (Perhaps) Common Solutions’ (2010) 34 Melbourne University Law Review 106.Google Scholar
Dietrich, J and Ridge, P, Accessories in Private Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Drewry, CS, The Law and Practice of Injunctions (London: S Sweet, 1841).Google Scholar
Drewry, CS, The Law and Practice of Injunctions: With a Supplement Containing Cases Decided since 1841 (London: S Sweet, 1849).Google Scholar
Edelman, J, ‘Equitable Torts’ (2002) 10 Torts Law Journal 64.Google Scholar
Edelman, J, ‘A “Fusion Fallacy” Fallacy’ (2003) 119 LQR 375.Google Scholar
Edelman, J, McGregor on Damages (20th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2018).Google Scholar
Edelman, J and Elliott, S, ‘Two Conceptions of Equitable Assignment’ (2015) 131 LQR 228.Google Scholar
Elphinstone, H, A Practical Introduction to Conveyancing (1st edn, London: William Maxwell, 1871).Google Scholar
Elphinstone, H, ‘What Is a Chose in Action?’ (1893) 9 LQR 311.Google Scholar
Firth, EC, ‘The Rule in Dearle v Hall’ (1895) 11 LQR 337.Google Scholar
Fisher, WR, The Law of Mortgage and Other Securities upon Property, vol. I (3rd edn, London: Butterworths, 1876).Google Scholar
Fox, D, ‘Overreaching’ in Birks, P and Pretto-Sakmann, A (eds.), Breach of Trust (Oxford: Hart, 2002).Google Scholar
Francis, R, Maxims of Equity (3rd edn, London: Henry Lintot, 1746).Google Scholar
Gensler, HJ, Ethics and the Golden Rule (New York: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Gillooly, M, Securities over Personalty (Sydney: Federation Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Glister, J, ‘Breach of trust and consequential loss’ (2014) 8 Journal of Equity 235.Google Scholar
Glister, J and Lee, J, Hanbury and Martin Modern Equity (20th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2015).Google Scholar
Glister, J and Lee, J, Hanbury and Martin Modern Equity (21st edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2018).Google Scholar
Goode, R, ‘The Right to Trace and Its Impact in Commercial Transactions ‒ II’ (1976) 92 LQR 528.Google Scholar
Goode, R, ‘Some Aspects of Factoring Law ‒ I: The Acquisition of Rights in the Receivables’ [1982] Journal of Business Law 240.Google Scholar
Goode, R, ‘Are Intangible Assets Fungible?’ [2003] LMCLQ 379.Google Scholar
Goode, R, ‘Contractual Prohibitions against Assignment’ [2009] LMCLQ 300.Google Scholar
Goode, R, Goode on Commercial Law (McKendrick, E, ed., 5th edn, London: LexisNexis, 2016).Google Scholar
Goode, R, Goode on Legal Problems of Credit and Security (Gullifer, L, ed., 6th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2017).Google Scholar
Goudkamp, J, Tort Law Defences (Oxford: Hart, 2013).Google Scholar
Gough, WJ, Company Charges (2nd edn, London: Butterworths, 1996).Google Scholar
Gour, H, The Law of Transfer in British India (4th edn, Calcutta: Thacker, Spink and Co., 1916).Google Scholar
Gower, LCB, ‘The Present Position of the Rule in Dearle v Hall ‒ I’ (1935) 20 Conveyancer 137.Google Scholar
Gower, LCB, ‘The Present Position of the Rule in Dearle v Hall ‒ II’ (1935) 20 Conveyancer 153.Google Scholar
Green, B, ‘Grey, Oughtred and Vandervell ‒ A Contextual Reappraisal’ (1984) 47 MLR 385.Google Scholar
Gullifer, L, ‘Should Clauses Prohibiting Assignment Be Overriden by Statute’ (2015) 4 Pennsylvania State Journal of Law and International Affairs 47.Google Scholar
Hackney, J, Understanding Equity and Trusts (London: Fontana, 1987).Google Scholar
Halsbury’s Laws of England, vol. 4 (3rd edn, London: Butterworths, 1953).Google Scholar
Halsbury’s Laws of England, vol. 1 (5th edn, London: Butterworths/LexisNexis, 2009).Google Scholar
Halsbury’s Laws of England, vol. 13 (5th edn, London: Butterworths/LexisNexis, 2009).Google Scholar
Halsbury’s Laws of England, vol. 22 (5th edn, London: Butterworths/LexisNexis, 2012).Google Scholar
Halsbury’s Laws of England, vol. 32 (5th edn, London: Butterworths/LexisNexis, 2012).Google Scholar
Halsbury’s Laws of England, vol. 52 (5th edn, London: Butterworths/LexisNexis 2014).Google Scholar
Halsbury’s Laws of England, vol. 13 (5th edn, London: Butterworths/LexisNexis, 2017).Google Scholar
Handley, K, Spencer Bower and Handley: Res Judicata (4th edn, London: LexisNexis, 2009).Google Scholar
Harpum, C, ‘The Stranger as Constructive Trustee: Part 1’ (1986) 102 LQR 114.Google Scholar
Harpum, C, Bridge, S and Dixon, M, Megarry & Wade – The Law of Real Property (8th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2012).Google Scholar
Harris, J, Variation of Trusts (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1975).Google Scholar
Hart, HLA, ‘Definition and Theory in Jurisprudence’ in Hart, HLA, Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Hayton, D, Underhill’s Law Relating to Trusts and Trustees (13th edn, London: Butterworths, 1979).Google Scholar
Hayton, D, Hayton and Marshall: Cases and Commentary on the Law of Trusts (7th edn, London: Stevens, 1980).Google Scholar
Hayton, DJ, Matthews, P and Mitchell, C, Underhill and Hayton: Law Relating to Trusts and Trustees (19th edn, London: LexisNexis, 2016).Google Scholar
Hazard, G, ‘Indispensable Party: The Historical Origin of a Procedural Phantom’ (1961) 61 Columbia Law Review 1254.Google Scholar
Heward, E, A Victorian Law Reformer: A Life of Lord Selborne (Chichester: Barry Rose Law Publishers, 1997).Google Scholar
Heydon, J and Leeming, M, Jacobs’ Law of Trusts in Australia (8th edn, Chatswood, NSW: LexisNexis Butterworths Australia, 2016).Google Scholar
Heydon, J, Leeming, M and Turner, P, Meagher, Gummow and Lehane’s Equity Doctrines and Remedies (5th edn, Chatswood, NSW: LexisNexis Butterworths Australia, 2015).Google Scholar
Hohfeld, W, ‘Nature of Stockholders’ Individual Liability for Corporation Debts’ (1909) 9 Columbia Law Review 285.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, W, ‘The Relations Between Equity and Law’ (1913) 11 Michigan Law Review 537.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, W, ‘Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning’ (1913) 23 Yale Law Journal 16.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, W, ‘Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning II’ (1917) 26 Yale Law Journal 710.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, W, Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning and Other Legal Essays (Cook, W, ed., New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1923).Google Scholar
Holdsworth, W, ‘History of the Treatment of Choses in Action by the Common Law’ (1920) 33 Harv L Rev 997.Google Scholar
Holdsworth, W, ‘Equity’ (1935) 51 LQR 142.Google Scholar
Holdsworth, W, A History of English Law, vol. VII (1st edn, London: Methuen & Co., 1925).Google Scholar
Holdsworth, W, A History of English Law, vol. VIII (2nd edn, London: Methuen & Co., 1937).Google Scholar
Holdsworth, W, A History of English Law, vol. XII (2nd edn, London: Methuen & Co., 1937).Google Scholar
Holdsworth, W, A History of English Law, vol. I (7th edn, revised, London: Methuen & Co., 1956).Google Scholar
Holland, T, The Elements of Jurisprudence (13th edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924).Google Scholar
Holmes, O, ‘Agency’ (1890‒1) 4 Harv L Rev 345.Google Scholar
Holmes, O, ‘Agency II’ (1891‒2) 5 Harv L Rev 1.Google Scholar
Holmes, O, The Common Law (Howe, MD, ed., London: Macmillan, 1968).Google Scholar
Hunter, M and Vaughan Williams, RL, Muir Hunter on Personal Insolvency (London: Stevens & Sons, 1988).Google Scholar
Jacob, SJIH, The Reform of Civil Procedural Law and Other Essays in Civil Procedure (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1982).Google Scholar
Johansson, E, Property Rights in Investment Securities and the Doctrine of Specificity (London: Springer, 2009).Google Scholar
Johnson, P, Roughton, A and Cook, TM, The Modern Law of Patents (3rd edn, London: LexisNexis, 2014).Google Scholar
Jolowicz, J, ‘Damages in Equity ‒ A Study of Lord Cairns’ Act’ (1975) 34 Cambridge Law Journal 224.Google Scholar
Jones, G, ‘Section 53(1)(c) and (2) of the Law of Property Act 1925 ‒ Recent Developments’ [1966] Cambridge Law Journal 19.Google Scholar
Keeton, G and Sheridan, L, Equity (2nd edn, Milton: Professional Books, 1976).Google Scholar
Keeton, G and Sheridan, L, Equity (3rd edn, London: Barry Rose, 1987).Google Scholar
Keeton, GW, An Introduction to Equity (1st edn, London: Pitman, 1938).Google Scholar
Kerr, WW, A Treatise on the Law and Practice of Injunctions in Equity (London: William Maxwell & Son, 1867).Google Scholar
Key, T and Elphinstone, HW, A Compendium of Precedents in Conveyancing (2 vols., London: William Maxwell and Son, 1878).Google Scholar
Lacy, JD, ‘Reflections on the Ambit of the Rule in Dearle v Hall and the Priority of Personal Property Assignments ‒ Part 2’ (1999) 28 Anglo-American Law Review 197.Google Scholar
Learmonth, A, Ford, C, Clark, J, Ross Martyn, J, Williams, E, Mortimer, H and Sunnucks, J (eds.), Williams, Mortimer and Sunnucks on Executors, Administrators and Probate (21st edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2018).Google Scholar
Lee, WA, ‘An Insoluble Problem of Mortgagees’ Priorities’ (1968) 32 Conveyancer and Property Lawyer 325.Google Scholar
Leeming, M, ‘Equity, the Judicature Acts and Restitution’ (2011) 5 Journal of Equity 199.Google Scholar
Liew, Y, Guest on the Law of Assignment (3rd edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2018).Google Scholar
Littleton, T, Littleton’s Tenures in English (Wambaugh, E, ed., London: J Byrne, 1903).Google Scholar
Lobban, M, ‘Preparing for Fusion: Reforming the Nineteenth-Century Court of Chancery, Part I’ (2006) 22 Law and History Review 389.Google Scholar
Lobban, M, ‘Preparing for Fusion: Reforming the Nineteenth-Century Court of Chancery, Part II’ (2006) 22 Law and History Review 565.Google Scholar
Low, K, ‘Nonfeasance in Equity’ (2012) 128 LQR 63.Google Scholar
Lowry, J and Edmunds, R, ‘Excuses’ in Birks, P and Pretto-Sakmann, A (eds.), Breach of Trust (Oxford: Hart, 2002).Google Scholar
Macrae, DC and Hertslet, CJB, Reports of Cases Relating to Insolvency: Vol. I (1847‒1852) (London: John Crockford, 1852).Google Scholar
Maitland, F, Equity Also, the Forms of Action at Common Law: Two Courses of Lectures (Chaytor, A and Whittaker, W, eds., 1st edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1909).Google Scholar
Maitland, F, Equity: A Course of Lectures (Brunyate, J, ed., 2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1936).Google Scholar
Marshall, O, The Assignment of Choses in Action (London: Pitman, 1950).Google Scholar
Martyn, J and Caddick, N, Williams, Mortimer and Sunnucks on Executors, Administrators and Probate (21st edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2018).Google Scholar
Matthews, P, ‘From Obligation to Property, and Back Again?’ in Hayton, D (ed.) Extending the Boundaries of Trusts and Similar Ring-Fenced Funds (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002).Google Scholar
Matthews, P, ‘All About Bare Trusts: Part I’ [2005] Private Client Business 266.Google Scholar
Matthews, P, ‘All About Bare Trusts: Part II’ [2005] Private Client Business 336.Google Scholar
Matthews, P, ‘Burgess v Wheate (1759)’ in Mitchell, C and Mitchell, P (eds.), Landmark Cases in Equity (Oxford: Hart, 2012).Google Scholar
McDermott, PM, ‘Survival of Jurisdiction under the Chancery Amendment Act 1858 (Lord Cairns’ Act)’ (1987) Civil Justice Quarterly 348.Google Scholar
McFarlane, B, ‘Understanding Equitable Estoppel: From Metaphors to Better Laws’ (2013) 66 Current Legal Problems 267.Google Scholar
McFarlane, B and Mitchell, C, Hayton and Mitchell: Text, Cases and Materials on the Law of Trusts and Equitable Remedies (14th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2015).Google Scholar
McFarlane, B and Stevens, R, ‘Interests in Securities: Practical Problems and Conceptual Solutions’ in Gullifer, L and Payne, J (eds.), Intermediated Securities: Legal Problems and Practical Issues (Oxford: Hart, 2010).Google Scholar
McGaw, MC, ‘A History of the Common Law of Agency with Particular Reference to the Concept of Irrevocable Authority Coupled with an Interest’ (DPhil thesis, University of Oxford, 2005).Google Scholar
McGhee, J, Bridge, S and Snell, EHT, Snell’s Equity (32nd edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010).Google Scholar
McGhee, J (ed.), Bridge, S, Matthew, C, Davies, PS, Elliott, SB, Fox, D, McFarlane, B, Nolan, R, and O’Sullivan, J, Snell’s Equity (33rd edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2015).Google Scholar
McLauchlan, D, ‘Priorities ‒ Equitable Tracing Rights and Assignments of Book Debts’ (1980) 96 LQR 90.Google Scholar
Mechem, F, A Treatise on the Law of Agency: Including not only a Discussion of the General Subject, but Also Special Chapters on Attorneys, Auctioneers, Brokers and Factors, vol. I (2nd edn, Chicago: Callaghan, 1914).Google Scholar
Merkin, R, Summer, JP and Hodgson, L, Colinvaux’s Law of Insurance (11th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuters, 2016).Google Scholar
Micheler, E, Property in Securities: A Comparative Study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Mill, JS, ‘On Liberty’ in Gray, J and Smith, G (eds.), JS Mill, On Liberty, in Focus (London: Routledge, 1991).Google Scholar
Mitchell, C, Watterson, S, Fenton, A, QC, Legge, H, Subrogation: Law and Practice (Revised edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Mitford, J, A Treatise on the Pleadings in Suits in the Court of Chancery by English bill (2nd edn, London: W Owen, 1787).Google Scholar
Morse, G (Principal ed.), Palmer’s Company Law (25th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1992).Google Scholar
Norton, RF, Dun, RH, Koe, DLF, Elphinstone, HW Sir and Clark, JW, A Treatise on Deeds (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1906).Google Scholar
Nottingham, Lord, Lord Nottingham’s ‘Manual of Chancery Practice’ and ‘Prolegomena of Chancery and Equity’ (Yale, DEC, ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965).Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, D, Elliott, SB and Zakrzewski, R, The Law of Rescission (2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Oakley, A, Parker and Mellows: The Modern Law of Trusts (9th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2008).Google Scholar
Oditah, F, ‘Priorities: Equitable versus Legal Assignments of Book Debts’ (1989) 9 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 513.Google Scholar
Oditah, F, Legal Aspects of Receivables Financing (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1991).Google Scholar
Oditah, F, ‘Recurrent Issues in Receivables Financing’ in Armour, J and Payne, J (eds.), Rationality in Company Law: Essays in Honour of DD Prentice (Oxford: Hart, 2009).Google Scholar
Ooi, M, Shares and Other Securities in the Conflict of Laws (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Pearce, R and Barr, W, Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations (7th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Peel, E, The Law of Contract (14th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2015).Google Scholar
Penner, J, The Law of Trusts (10th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Penner, J, ‘The (True) Nature of a Beneficiary’s Equitable Proprietary Interest Under a Trust’ (2014) 27 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 473.Google Scholar
Pennington, R, Company Law (8th edn, London: Butterworths, 2001).Google Scholar
Polden, P, ‘Mingling the Waters: Personalities, Politics and the Making of the Supreme Court of Judicature’ (2002) 61 Cambridge Law Journal 575.Google Scholar
Polden, P, ‘The Court of Chancery, 1820–1875’ in Baker, J Sir (Gen ed.), The Oxford History of the Laws of England, vol. XI (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Polden, P, ‘The Judicature Acts’ in Baker, J Sir (Gen ed.), The Oxford History of the Laws of England, vol. XI (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Pollock, F, ‘Contract’ in Encyclopædia Britannica, vol. 7 (11th edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1910).Google Scholar
Pollock, F, Pollock’s Principles of Contract (Winfield, SP, ed., 13th edn, London: Stevens & Sons, 1950).Google Scholar
Postema, GJ, Bentham and the Common Law Tradition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Powell, R, The Law of Agency (2nd edn, London: Pitman, 1961).Google Scholar
Pretto-Sakmann, A, Boundaries of Personal Property (Oxford: Hart, 2005).Google Scholar
Pugsley, D, ‘London Tramways (1898)’ (1996) 17 Journal of Legal History 172.Google Scholar
Ready, NP, Brooke’s Notary (14th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters, 2013).Google Scholar
Reynolds, F, ‘When Is an Agent’s Authority Irrevocable?’ in Cranston, R (ed.) Making Commercial Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Ruddy, N, Mills, S and Davidson, N, Salinger on Factoring (5th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2017).Google Scholar
Seavey, W, ‘The Rationale of Agency’ (1919‒20) 29 Yale Law Journal 859.Google Scholar
Seavey, W, ‘Termination by Death of Proprietary Powers of Attorney’ (1921‒2) 31 Yale Law Journal 283.Google Scholar
Selborne, Earl of, Memorials Part II: Personal and Political 1865‒1895, vol. 1 (Palmer, LSM, ed., London: Macmillan & Co., 1898).Google Scholar
Sessions, R, ‘How a “Difficult Composer” Gets That Way’, New York Times, 8 January 1950; reprinted in Roger Sessions on Music: Collected Essays (Cone ET (ed.), New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Sheehan, D, The Principles of Personal Property Law (2nd edn, Oxford: Hart, 2017).Google Scholar
Simpson, AWB, ‘The Modification of the Structure of the Courts’ in Thornley, J and Allsop, P (eds.), Then and Now, 1799–1974: Commemorating 175 Years of Law Bookselling and Publishing (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1974).Google Scholar
Sin, KF, The Legal Nature of the Unit Trust (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Smith, HE, ‘Equitable Defences as Meta-Law’ in Davies, PS, Douglas, S and Goudkamp, J (eds.), Defences in Equity (Oxford: Hart, 2018).Google Scholar
Smith, L, ‘Constructive Trusts and Constructive Trustees’ (1999) 58 Cambridge Law Journal 294.Google Scholar
Smith, L, ‘Philosophical Foundations of Proprietary Remedies’ in Chambers, R, Mitchell, C and Penner, J (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Unjust Enrichment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Smith, LD, ‘Tracing in Taylor v. Plumer: Equity in the Court of King’s Bench’ (1995) LMCLQ 240, 241–8.Google Scholar
Smith, M, ‘Locus Standi and the Enforcement of Legal Claims by Cestuis Que Trust and Assignees’ (2008) 22 Trust Law International 140.Google Scholar
Smith, M, ‘Assignments of Intangibles as Security: Some Unlitigated Pitfalls’ (2015) 9 Butterworths Journal of International Banking and Financial Law 558.Google Scholar
Smith, M and Leslie, N, The Law of Assignment (3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Smith, SA, ‘Contracts for the Benefit of Third Parties: In Defence of the Third-Party Rule’ (1997) 17 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 643.Google Scholar
Smith, SA, ‘Why Courts Make Orders (And What This Tells Us About Damages)’ (2011) 64. Current Legal Problems 51.Google Scholar
Spence, G, The Equitable Jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery, vol. II (Philadelphia: Lea and Blanchard, 1850).Google Scholar
Starke, J, Assignments of Choses in Action in Australia (London: Butterworths, 1972).Google Scholar
Stevens, R, Torts and Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Stone, H, ‘The Nature of the Rights of the Cestui Que Trust’ (1917) 17 Columbia Law Review 467.Google Scholar
Stone, J, Legal System and Lawyers’ Reasonings (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Story, J, Commentaries on Equity Jurisprudence, as Administered in England and America, vol. II (1st edn, Boston: Hillard, Gray & Company, 1836).Google Scholar
Story, J, Commentaries on Equity Pleadings, and the Incidents thereto, According to the Practice of the Courts of Equity of England and America (London: A Maxwell, Bell Yard, 1838).Google Scholar
Story, J, Commentaries on the Law of Agency: As a Branch of Commercial and Maritime Jurisprudence, with Occasional Illustrations from the Civil and Foreign Law (Greenough, CP, ed., 9th edn, Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1882).Google Scholar
Story, J and Grigsby, W, Commentaries on Equity Jurisprudence (1st English edn, London: Stevens and Haynes, 1884).Google Scholar
Strahan, JA, Strahan’s Digest of Equity (Eastwood, RA, ed., 6th edn, London: Butterworth & Co., 1939).Google Scholar
Swadling, W, ‘Property: General Principles’, para. 4.06, in Burrows, AS (ed.), English Private Law (3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Sweet, C, ‘Choses in Action’ (1895) 11 LQR 238.Google Scholar
Tarrant, HJ, Lloyd’s Bonds – Their Nature and Use (London: Stevens and Haynes, 1867).Google Scholar
Tettenborn, A, An Introduction to the Law of Obligations (London: Butterworths, 1984).Google Scholar
Tettenborn, A, ‘Equitable Assignment and Procedural Quibbles’ (1995) 54 Cambridge Law Journal 499.Google Scholar
Tettenborn, A, ‘Assignment of Rights to Compensation’ [2007] LMCLQ 392.Google Scholar
Tettenborn, A, ‘Assignments, Trusts, Property and Obligations’ in Neyers, JW, Bronaugh, R and Pitel, SGA (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford: Hart, 2009).Google Scholar
Tham, CH, ‘Equitable Assignment and Anti-Assignment Clauses’ in Neyers, JW, Bronaugh, R and Pitel, SGA (eds.), Exploring Contract Law (Oxford: Hart, 2009).Google Scholar
Tham, CH, ‘Notice of Assignment and Discharge by Performance’ [2010] LMCLQ 38.Google Scholar
Tham, CH, ‘The Mechanics of Equitable Assignments: One Engine or Two?’ in Degeling, S, Edelman, J and Goudkamp, J (eds.), Contracts in Commercial Law (Pyrmont, NSW: Thomson Reuters Australia, 2016).Google Scholar
Tham, CH, ‘The “Trustee Exception” in Lloyd’s v Harper: Loss, Liability, and “Black Holes”’ (2016) 132 LQR 148.Google Scholar
Tham, CH, ‘Exploding the Myth that Sub-Trustees “Drop Out”’ (2017) 31 Trust Law International 76.Google Scholar
Tham, CH, ‘Joinder of Equitable Assignors of Equitable and Legal Choses in Action’ [2017] LMCLQ 467.Google Scholar
‘The Supreme Court of Judicature Act ‒ Part II: Jurisdiction and Law’ (1873) 55 The Law Times 372.Google Scholar
Tidd, W, The Practice of the Courts of King’s Bench and Common Pleas in Personal Actions and Ejectment, vol. I (9th edn, London: Joseph Butterworth and Son, 1828).Google Scholar
Tolhurst, GJ, ‘The Nature of an Assignee’s Right to Damages for Breaches of Contract that Occur Prior to Assignment’ (2008) 24 Journal of Contract Law 77.Google Scholar
Tolhurst, GJ, The Assignment of Contractual Rights (2nd edn, Oxford: Hart, 2016).Google Scholar
Tolhurst, G and Carter, J, ‘Prohibitions on Assignment: A Choice to Be Made’ (2014) 73 Cambridge Law Journal 405.Google Scholar
Trukhtanov, A, ‘In Defence of the “No Discharge after Notice” Rule’ [2010] LMCLQ 551.Google Scholar
Tucker, L, Le Poidevin, N, Brightwell, J, Fletcher, T and Lloyd, C, Lewin on Trusts (19th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuters, 2015).Google Scholar
Tudsbery, F, The Nature, Requisites and Operation of Equitable Assignments (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1912).Google Scholar
Turner, P, ‘Assignments by Way of Charge’ (2004) 24 Australian Bar Review 280.Google Scholar
Turner, P, ‘Prohibitions on Assignment: Intellectualism v Law’ (2018) 134 LQR 532.Google Scholar
Tytler, AF, Memoirs of the Life and Writings of the Honourable Henry Home of Kames, vol. I (2nd edn, Cadell, T and Davies, W, eds., Edinburgh: T Cadell and W Davies, 1814).Google Scholar
Underhill, A, ‘Changes in the Law of Property’ in A Century of Law Reform (London: Macmillan & Co., 1901).Google Scholar
Vaines, JC, Crossley Vaines’ Personal Property (Tyler, E and Palmer, N, eds., 5th edn, London: Butterworths, 1973).Google Scholar
Sir Vos, Geoffrey (editor-in-chief) et al., Civil Procedure, 2 vols. (London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters, 2018).Google Scholar
Waddams, S, Principle and Policy in Contract Law: Competing or Complementary Concepts? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Waddams, S, ‘Equity in English Contract Law: The Impact of the Judicature Acts (1873‒75)’ (2012) 33 Journal of Legal History 185.Google Scholar
Warren, W, The Law Relating to Choses in Action (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1899).Google Scholar
Waters, D, ‘The Variation of Trusts’ (1960) 13 Current Legal Problems 36.Google Scholar
Watterson, S, ‘Limitation of Actions, Dishonest Assistance and Knowing Receipt’ (2014) 73 Cambridge Law Journal 253.Google Scholar
Wattles, J, The Golden Rule (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Watts, P and Reynolds, FMB, Bowstead and Reynolds on Agency (21st edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2018).Google Scholar
Wenar, L, ‘The Nature of Rights’ (2005) 33 Philosophy & Public Affairs 223.Google Scholar
White, F and Tudor, O, White & Tudor’s Leading Cases in Equity: With Notes (Hewitt, E and Richardson, J, eds., 9th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1928).Google Scholar
Williams, J, Williams, TC and Byrne, WJ, Principles of the Law of Personal Property, Intended for the Use of Students in Conveyancing (18th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1926).Google Scholar
Williams, TC, ‘Property, Things in Action and Copyright’ (1895) 11 LQR 223.Google Scholar
Wilson, A, Wilson’s Supreme Court of Judicature Acts, Rules, and Forms (Mackenzie, MM and White, CA, eds., 5th edn, London: Stevens & Sons, 1886).Google Scholar
Wingate, E, Maximes of Reason: Or, The Reason of the Common Law of England (London: R. & W. Leybourne, 1658).Google Scholar
Wolstenholme, EP and Cherry, BL Sir, Wolstenholme and Cherry’s Conveyancing Statutes (Farrand, JT, ed., 13th edn, London: Oyez, 1972).Google Scholar
Wood, T, An Institute of the Laws of England: Or, the Laws of England in Their Natural Order, According to Common Use (8th edn, London: Henry Lintot, 1754).Google Scholar
Yeo, TM, ‘Dishonest Assistance: Restatement from the Privy Council’ (2006) 122 LQR 171.Google Scholar
Yeo, TM and Tjio, H, ‘Knowing What Is Dishonesty’ (2002) 118 LQR 502.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • C. H. Tham, Singapore Management University
  • Book: Understanding the Law of Assignment
  • Online publication: 10 October 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108636674.026
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • C. H. Tham, Singapore Management University
  • Book: Understanding the Law of Assignment
  • Online publication: 10 October 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108636674.026
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • C. H. Tham, Singapore Management University
  • Book: Understanding the Law of Assignment
  • Online publication: 10 October 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108636674.026
Available formats
×