Book contents
- The Unruly Notion of Abuse of Rights
- The Unruly Notion of Abuse of Rights
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword: The Thesis and a Confession
- 1 Matters of Nomenclature
- 2 An Idealistic but Troublesome Impulse
- 3 A Cacophony of Criteria
- 4 A ‘Principle’ with No Rules?
- 5 The Challenge of Establishing Universal Principles
- 6 The Politis/Lauterpacht Quest to Elevate the Concept
- 7 Rejection and Retrenchment
- 8 The Vanishing Prospect
- Index
7 - Rejection and Retrenchment
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 July 2020
- The Unruly Notion of Abuse of Rights
- The Unruly Notion of Abuse of Rights
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword: The Thesis and a Confession
- 1 Matters of Nomenclature
- 2 An Idealistic but Troublesome Impulse
- 3 A Cacophony of Criteria
- 4 A ‘Principle’ with No Rules?
- 5 The Challenge of Establishing Universal Principles
- 6 The Politis/Lauterpacht Quest to Elevate the Concept
- 7 Rejection and Retrenchment
- 8 The Vanishing Prospect
- Index
Summary
The Politis/Lauterpacht project foundered both on academic rejection and (above all) the jealousy of states with regard to their sovereignty. The pragmatic alternative was first described by Kiss in a remarkable doctoral thesis in 1953, prefaced by five incisive words by Bastid, his supervisor: ‘it [abuse of right] should not be taken literally’. In this more modest conception, the prevention of abuse of right (which no one will dispute as an abstract proposition) is recognized as a general policy goal, requiring the hard work of negotiating contextually meaningful criteria as lex specialis. This reasonable retrenchment is informed by the understanding that avoiding abuse of rights on the international plane requires the accommodation of concurrent rights which may naturally generate competing claims. This process does not call for the assignment of moral blame, and cannot succeed as intuitive projections of the phrase ‘abuse of right’.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Unruly Notion of Abuse of Rights , pp. 85 - 107Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020