Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-685pp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-04T01:08:23.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Urban environments and ecosystem functions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Kevin J. Gaston ,
Zoe G. Davies  and
Jill L. Edmondson
Edited by
Kevin J. Gaston
Kevin J. Gaston
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Get access

Summary

Urbanisation profoundly changes both the abiotic and biotic properties of ecosystems. It does so not just within urban areas, but also in surrounding landscapes and often much further afield. Traditionally, the foremost focus for research has been on the negative impacts of these changes, particularly for human health and wellbeing, and how these can most effectively be mitigated. This is readily understandable given that, for much of their history, urban environments have often been associated with high rates of infant mortality, disease outbreaks and a generally poor quality of life, and that this still remains true for many of those living in cities today (Woods 2003; UN-HABITAT 2006; Birchenall 2007). From a broader ecological perspective, urban areas have also long been considered depauperate in comparison to their rural counterparts in terms of flora and fauna, with the exception of a few notable species that were widely categorised as pests.

More recently, research into urban environments has increasingly shifted towards examining the positive contributions that such areas can make both to the human population and to other species. Of course, viewing urban environments in terms of the benefits they can provide or the costs they can exact are essentially two sides of the same coin. However, closer consideration of the potential advantages has served to broaden the range of environmental issues that have received emphasis; rather than focusing almost exclusively on the undoubtedly vital human health concerns resulting from poor air quality, unclean water and inadequate sanitation, there is now a growing appreciation of the benefits that greener and more ecologically diverse urban areas have on the mental and physical status of residents, on economic markets and for biological conservation (Chapters 7–11; Fuller et al. 2010; Gaston & Evans 2010; Irvine et al. 2010).

Type
Chapter
Information
Urban Ecology , pp. 35 - 52
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akbari, H. (2002). Shade trees reduce building energy use and CO2 emissions from power plants. Environmental Pollution, 116, S119–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akbari, H., Kurn, D. M., Bretz, S. E. and Hanford, J. W. (1997). Peak power and cooling energy savings of shade trees. Energy and Buildings, 25, 139–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexandri, E. and Jones, P. (2008). Temperature decrease in an urban canyon due to green walls and green roofs on diverse climates. Building and Environments, 43, 480–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alig, R. J., Kline, J. D. and Lichtenstein, M. (2004). Urbanization on the US landscape: looking ahead in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69, 219–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnfield, A. J. (2003). Two decades of urban climate research: a review of turbulence, exchanges of energy and water, and the urban heat island. International Journal of Climatology, 23, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, C. L. and Gibbons, C. J. (1996). Impervious surface coverage: the emergence of a key environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62, 243–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, L. A., Brazel, A. J., Selover, N.et al. (2002). Urbanization and warming of Phoenix (Arizona, USA): impacts, feedbacks and mitigation. Urban Ecosystems, 6, 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, K. P., Freer-Smith, P. H. and Taylor, G. (1998). Urban woodlands: their role in reducing the effects of particulate pollution. Environmental Pollution, 99, 347–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beebee, T. J. C. (1997). Changes in dewpond numbers and amphibian diversity over 20 years on chalk downland in Sussex, England. Biological Conservation, 81, 215–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibby, R. L. and Webster-Brown, J. G. (2005). Characterisation of urban catchment suspended particulate matter (Auckland region, New Zealand); a comparison with non-urban SPM. Science of the Total Environment, 343, 177–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birchenall, J. A. (2007). Economic development and the escape from high mortality. World Development, 35, 543–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolund, P. and Hunhammar, S. (1999). Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 29, 293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunekreef, B. and Holgate, S. T. (2002). Air pollution and health. The Lancet, 360, 1233–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carreiro, M. M., Howe, K., Parkhurst, D. F. and Pouyat, R. V. (1999). Variation in quality and decomposability of red oak leaf litter along an urban–rural gradient. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 30, 258–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Characklis, G. W. and Wiesner, M. R. (1997). Particles, metals and water quality in runoff from a large urban watershed. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 123, 753–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X.-L., Zhao, H.-M., Li, P.-X. and Yin, Z.-Y. (2006). Remote sensing image-based analysis of the relationship between urban heat island and land use/cover changes. Remote Sensing of the Environment, 104, 133–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y. and Wong, N. H. (2006). Thermal benefits of city parks. Energy and Buildings, 38, 105–20.Google Scholar
Collier, C. G. (2006). The impact of urban areas on weather. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 132, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duh, J.-D., Shandas, V., Chang, H. and George, L. A. (2008). Rates of urbanisation and the resiliency of air and water quality. Science of the Total Environment, 400, 238–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Effland, W. R. and Pouyat, R. V. (1997). The genesis, classification, and mapping of soils in urban areas. Urban Ecosystems, 1, 217–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erb, K.-H. (2004). Land-use related changes in aboveground carbon stocks of Austria's terrestrial ecosystems. Ecosystems, 7, 563–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eremeeva, N. I. and Sushchev, D. V. (2005). Structural changes in the fauna of pollinating insects in urban landscapes. Russian Journal of Ecology, 36, 259–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faeth, S. H., Warren, P. S., Stochat, E. and Marussich, W. A. (2005). Trophic dynamics in urban communities. BioScience, 55, 399–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, J. H. (1976). Energetics of a suburban lawn ecosystem. Ecology, 57, 141–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group (1998). Disturbance affecting streams. In Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices. Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group (FISRWG). Available at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/stream_restoration/newgra.html
Fetridge, E. D., Ascher, J. S. and Langellotto, G. A. (2008). The bee fauna of residential gardens in a suburb of New York City (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 101, 1067–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freer-Smith, P. H., Holloway, S. and Goodman, A. (1997). The uptake of particulates by an urban woodland: site description and particulate composition. Environmental Pollution, 95, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuller, R. A., Tratalos, J., Warren, P. H.et al. (2010). Environment and biodiversity. In Jenks, M. and Jones, C., eds., Dimensions of the Sustainable City. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, pp. 75–103.Google Scholar
Gaffin, S. R., Rosenzweig, C., Khanbilvardi, R.et al. (2008). Variations in New York City's urban heat island strength over time and space. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 94, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaston, K. J. and Evans, K. L. (2010). Urbanisation and development. In Maclean, N., ed., Silent Summer: The State of Wildlife in Britain and Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, in press.Google Scholar
Gehrt, S. D. and Chelsvig, J. E. (2004). Species-specific patterns of bat activity in an urban landscape. Ecological Applications, 14, 625–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgi, N. J. and Zafiriadis, K. (2006). The impact of park trees on microclimate in urban areas. Urban Ecosystems, 9, 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golubiewski, N. E. (2006). Urbanization increases grassland carbon pools: effects of landscaping in Colorado's front range. Ecological Applications, 16, 555–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, R. D. and Baillie, S. R. (1998). Large-scale habitat use of some declining British birds. Journal of Applied Ecology, 35, 785–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Y., Jia, Y., Pan, X., Liu, L. and Wichmann, H.-E. (2009). The association between fine particulate air pollution and hospital emergency room visits for cardiovascular disease in Beijing, China. Science of the Total Environment, 407, 4826–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hand, L. M. and Shepherd, J. M. (2009). An investigation of warm-season spatial rainfall variability in Oklahoma City: possible linkages to urbanization and prevailing wind. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 48, 251–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, J. A. and Dicks, S. E. (1987). Association of urban temperatures with land use and surface materials. Landscape and Urban Planning, 14, 21–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imhoff, M. L., Bounoua, L., DeFries, R.et al. (2004). The consequences of urban land transformation on net primary productivity in the United States. Remote Sensing of the Environment, 89, 434–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, K. N., Fuller, R. A., Devine-Wright, P.et al. (2010). Ecological and psychological value of urban green space. In Jenks, M. and Jones, C., eds., Dimensions of the Sustainable City. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, pp. 215–37.Google Scholar
Jenerette, G. D., Harlan, S. L., Brazel, A.et al. (2007). Regional relationships between surface temperature, vegetation, and human settlement in a rapidly urbanizing ecosystem. Landscape Ecology, 22, 353–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jim, C. Y. and Chen, W. Y. (2008). Assessing the ecosystem service of air pollutant removal by urban trees in Guangzhou (China). Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 665–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jo, H.-K. and McPherson, E. G. (1995). Carbon storage and flux in urban residential greenspace. Journal of Environmental Management, 45, 109–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, A. D. and Gerhold, H. D. (2003). Carbon storage by urban tree cultivars, in roots and above-ground. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, P. D., Groisman, P. Y., Coughlan, M.et al. (1990). Assessment of urbanization effects in time series of surface air temperature over land. Nature, 347, 169–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalnay, E. and Cai, M. (2003). Impact of urbanization and land-use change on climate. Nature, 423, 528–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karl, T. R., Diaz, H. F. and Kukla, G. (1988). Urbanization: its detection and effect in the United States climate record. Journal of Climate, 1, 1099–123.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, J. P., Groffman, P. M., Grimm, N. B., Baker, L. A. and Pouyat, R. V. (2006). A distinct urban biogeochemistry?Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21, 192–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaye, J. P., McCulley, R. L. and Burke, I. C. (2005). Carbon fluxes, nitrogen cycling, and soil microbial communities in adjacent urban, native and agricultural ecosystems. Global Change Biology, 11, 575–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C., Cuddihy, J. and Engel-Yan, J. (2007). The changing metabolism of cities. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, C. P., Quattrochi, D. A. and Luvall, J. C. (1997). Application of high-resolution thermal infrared remote sensing and GIS to assess the urban heat island effect. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18, 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,London Assembly Environment Committee (2007). Chainsaw Massacre: A Review of London's Street Trees. London: Greater London Authority.Google Scholar
Lorenz, K. and Lal, R. (2009). Biogeochemical C and N cycles in urban soils. Environment International, 35, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, K., Preston, C. M. and Kandeler, E. (2006). Soil organic matter in urban soils: estimation of elemental carbon by thermal oxidation and characterization of organic matter by solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Geoderma, 130, 312–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovett, G. M., Tear, T. H., Evers, D. C.et al. (2009). Effects of air pollution on ecosystems and biological diversity in the eastern United States. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1162, 99–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacFarlane, D. W. (2009). Potential availability of urban wood biomass in Michigan: implications for energy production, carbon sequestration and sustainable forest management in the U.S.A. Biomass and Bioenergy, 33, 628–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matteson, K. C., Ascher, J. S. and Langellotto, G. A. (2008). Bee richness and abundance in New York City urban gardens. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 101, 140–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, H. (1999). Air pollution in cities. Atmospheric Environment, 33, 4029–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, M. J., Pickett, S. T. A., Groffman, P.et al. (1997). Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems, 1, 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHale, M. R., McPherson, E. G. and Burke, I. C. (2007). The potential of urban tree plantings to be cost effective in carbon credit markets. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 6, 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, N. E. and Hostetler, M. E. (2001). Effects of urban land use on pollinator (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) communities in a desert metropolis. Basic and Applied Ecology, 2, 209–18.Google Scholar
,Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Neil, K. and Wu, J. (2006). Effects of urbanization on plant flowering phenology: a review. Urban Ecosystems, 9, 243–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nizeyimana, E. L., Petersen, G. W., Imhoff, M. L.et al. (2001). Assessing the impact of land conversion to urban land use on soils with different productivity levels in the USA. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 65, 391–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, D. J. and Crane, D. E. (2002). Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environmental Pollution, 116, 381–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowak, D. J., Stevens, J. C., Sisinni, S. M. and Luley, C. J. (2002). Effects of urban tree management and species selection on atmospheric carbon dioxide. Journal of Arboriculture, 28, 113–22.Google Scholar
Oke, T. R. (1987). Boundary Layer Climates, 2nd edn. Methuen Co.Google Scholar
Partecke, J., Van't Hof, T. and Gwinner, E. (2004). Differences in the timing of reproduction between urban and forest European Blackbirds (Turdus merula): result of phenotypic flexibility or genetic differences?Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 271, 1995–2001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pataki, D. E., Alig, R. J., Fung, A. S.et al. (2006). Urban ecosystems and the North American carbon cycle. Global Change Biology, 12, 2092–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, M. J. and Meyer, J. L. (2001). Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32, 333–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauleit, S. and Duhme, F. (2000). Assessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 52, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauleit, S., Ennos, R. and Golding, Y. (2005). Modeling the environmental impacts of urban land use and land cover change – a study in Merseyside, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning, 71, 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peach, W. J., Denny, M., Cotton, P. A.et al. (2004). Habitat selection by song thrushes in stable and declining farmland populations. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, 275–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, M. L., Grove, J. M.et al. (2001). Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32, 127–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouyat, R., Groffman, P., Yesilonis, I. and Hernandez, L. (2002). Soil carbon pools and fluxes in urban ecosystems. Environmental Pollution, 116, S107–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pouyat, R. V., McDonnell, M. J. and Pickett, S. T. A. (1997). Litter decomposition and nitrogen mineralization in oak stands along an urban-rural land use gradient. Urban Ecosystems, 1, 117–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouyat, R. V., Yesilonis, I. D. and Golubiewski, N. E. (2009). A comparison of soil organic carbon stocks between residential turf grass and native soil. Urban Ecosystems, 12, 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouyat, R. V., Yesilonis, I. D. and Nowak, D. J. (2006). Carbon storage by urban soils in the United States. Journal of Environmental Quality, 35, 1566–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quigley, M. F. (2004). Street trees and rural conspecifics: will long-lived trees reach full size in urban conditions?Urban Ecosystems, 7, 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawlins, B. G., Vane, C. H., Kim, A. W.et al. (2008). Methods for estimating types of organic soil carbon and their application to surveys of UK urban areas. Soil Use and Management, 24, 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowntree, R. A. and Nowak, D. (1991). Quantifying the role of urban forests in removing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Journal of Arboriculture, 17, 269–75.Google Scholar
Scalenghe, R. and Marsan, F. A. (2009). The anthropogenic sealing of soils in urban areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 90, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, W., Wu, J., Grimm, N. B. and Hope, D. (2008). Effects of urbanization-induced environmental changes on ecosystem functioning in the Phoenix Metropolitan Region, USA. Ecosystems, 11, 138–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, J. M. (2005). A review of current investigations of urban-induced rainfall and recommendations for the future. Earth Interactions, 9, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soubbotina, T. P. (2004). Beyond Economic Growth: An Introduction to Sustainable Development, 2nd edn. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, B. and Rodgers, M. O. (2001). Urban form and thermal efficiency. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67, 186–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taha, H., Konopacki, S. and Gabersek, S. (1999). Impacts of large-scale surface modifications on meteorological conditions and energy use: a 10-region modelling study. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 62, 175–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tratalos, J., Fuller, R. A., Warren, P. H., Davies, R. G. and Gaston, K. J. (2007). Urban form, biodiversity potential and ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83, 308–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trusilova, K. and Churkina, G. (2008). The response of the terrestrial biosphere to urbanization: land cover conversion, climate, and urban pollution. Biogeosciences, 5, 1505–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,UN-HABITAT (2006). The State of the World's Cities Report 2006/2007. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Walsh, C. J., Roy, A. H., Feminella, J. W.et al. (2005). The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 24, 706–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weng, Q., Liu, H. and Lu, D. (2007). Assessing the effects of land use and land cover patterns on thermal conditions using landscape metrics in city of Indianapolis, United States. Urban Ecosystems, 10, 203–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. A., Nemani, R. R., Thornton, P. E. and Running, S. W. (2002). Satellite evidence of phenological differences between urbanized and rural areas of the eastern United States deciduous broadleaf forest. Ecosystems, 5, 260–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitford, V., Ennos, A. R. and Handley, J. F. (2001). ‘City form and natural process’ – indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas and their application to Merseyside, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57, 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, R. (2003). Urban–rural mortality differentials: an unresolved debate. Population and Development Review, 29, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,World Resources Institute, the United Nations Environment Programme, the United Nations Development Programme and the World Bank (1998). World Resources 1998–99: Environmental Change and Human Health. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zanette, L. R. S., Martins, R. P. and Ribeiro, S. P. (2005). Effects of urbanization on Neotropical wasp and bee assemblages in a Brazilian metropolis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 71, 105–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, C., Tian, H., Pan, S.et al. (2008). Effects of forest regrowth and urbanization on ecosystem carbon storage in a rural-urban gradient in the southeastern United States. Ecosystems, 11, 1211–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X. Y., Friedl, M. A., Schaaf, C. B. and Strahler, A. H. (2004a). Climate controls on vegetation phenological patterns in northern mid- and high latitudes inferred from MODIS data. Global Change Biology, 10, 1133–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X. Y., Friedl, M. A., Strahler, A. H. and Schneider, A. (2004b). The footprint of urban climates on vegetation phenology. Geophysical Research Letters, 31, L12209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, S., Da, L., Tang, Z.et al. (2006). Ecological consequences of rapid urban expansion: Shanghai, China. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4, 341–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×