Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:39:28.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Numidian State Formation in the Tunisian High Tell

from Part III - Neighbours and Comparanda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

Martin Sterry
Affiliation:
University of Durham
David J. Mattingly
Affiliation:
University of Leicester
Get access

Summary

For many archaeologists this quote from Godelier encapsulates one of the main goals of our discipline. The formation of states and cities (one of the elements normally accompanying this form of societal organisation) cannot therefore be limited to the study of individual cases. Whatever the specific differences, these cases may, when interpreted under the light of well-founded hypothetical models, constitute a fundamental part in understanding the intercultural processes in the creation of new hierarchies. However, there is not widespread agreement on how this may take place. For some of our colleagues, the notion of ‘state’ (and perhaps the notion of ‘city’ as well?) is just a ‘Western’ construction, which does not have any significance in many other parts of the world. According to this constructivist point of view, the state simply did not exist in these areas.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belarte, M.C. 2011. Les sondages dans la zone 1. In Kallala and Sanmartí 2011, 45110.Google Scholar
Belkahia, S. and Di Vita-Évrard, C. 1995. Magistratures autochtones dans les cités pérégrines de I’Afrique romaine. In Trousset, P., P. (ed.), Monuments funéraires, institutions autochtones en Afrique du Nord antique et médiévale, VIe colloque international sur I’histoire et l’archéologie de l’Afrique du Nord. Paris: Editions du CTHS, 255–74.Google Scholar
Berthier, A. 1980. Un habitat punique à Constantine. Antiquités africaines 16: 1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanton, R.E. 1998. Beyond centralization. Steps toward a theory of egalitarian behaviour in archaic states. In Feinman and Marcus 1998, 135–72.Google Scholar
Bondarenko, D.M., Grinin, L.E. and Korotayev, A.V. 2002. Alternative pathways of social evolution. Social Evolution & History 1.1: 5479.Google Scholar
Brun, P. 2015. L’évolution en dents de scie des formes d’expression du pouvoir durant l’âge du Fer en Europe tempérée. In Belarte, C., Garcia, D. and Sanmartí, J. (eds), Les estructures socials protohistòriques a la Gàllia i Ibèria (Homenatge a Aurora Martín i Enriqueta Pons), VII Reunió Internacional d’Arqueologia de Calafell (Calafell, del 7 al 9 de març de 2013). Barcelona: Institut Català d’Arqueologia Clàssica, 4959.Google Scholar
Camps, G. 1960. Les traces d’un Âge du Bronze en Afrique du Nord. Revue africaine 104: 3155.Google Scholar
Camps, G. 1961a. Monuments et rites funéraires protohistoriques: Aux origines de la Berbérie. Paris: Arts et Métiers Graphiques.Google Scholar
Camps, G. 1961b. Aux origines de Ia Berbérie. Massinissa ou les débuts de I’histoire. (Libyca 8). Algiers: Service des Antiquités.Google Scholar
Camps, G. 1995. Les nécropoles mégalithiques de l’Afrique du Nord. In Trousset, P. (ed.), Monuments funéraires, institutions autochtones en Afrique du Nord antique et médiévale, VIe colloque international sur I’histoire et l’archéologie de l’Afrique du Nord. Paris: Editions du CTHS, 1731.Google Scholar
Camps, G. and Camps-Fabrer, H. 1964. La nécropole mégalithique du Djebel Mazela à Bou Nouara. Mémoires du Centre de recherches anthropologiques, préhistoriques et ethnographiques, III. Paris: Arts et métiers graphiques.Google Scholar
Cantero, F.J. and Piqué, R. 2016. Ressources forestières à partir de l’étude des charbons de bois. In Kallala et al. 2016, 491515.Google Scholar
Crumley, C. 1995. Building an historical ecology of Gaulish polities. In Arnold, B. and Gibson, D.B. (eds), Celtic Chiefdom, Celtic State. The Evolution of Complex Social Systems in Prehistoric Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2633.Google Scholar
Ennaïfer, M. 1976. La cité d’Althiburos et l’ëdifice des Asclëpieia. Bibliothèque Archéologique, vol. I. Tunis: lnstitut National d’Archéologie et d’Art.Google Scholar
Feinman, G.M. and Marcus, J. (eds). 1998. Archaic States. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Fentress, E. 2006. Romanizing the Berbers. Past and Present 190: 332.Google Scholar
Ferjaoui, A. 2010. Les relations entre Carthage et l’intérieur de l’Afrique. Le cas de Zama Regia et sa région. In Ferjaoui, A. (ed.), Carthage et les autochtones de son empire du temps de Zama. Hommage à Mhamed Hassine Fantar. Tunis: Institut National du Patrimoine, 341–52.Google Scholar
Frankenstein, S. and Rowlands, M.J. 1978. The internal structure and regional context of Early Iron Age society in south-western, Germany. Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology 16: 73112.Google Scholar
Gatto, M.C., Mattingly, D.J., Ray, N. and Sterry, M. (eds). 2019. Burials, Migration and Identity in the Ancient Sahara and Beyond. Trans-Saharan Archaeology, vol. 2. Series editor Mattingly, D.J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Godelier, M. 1980. L’État: Les processus de sa formation, la diversité de ses formes et de ses bases. Revue internationale des sciences sociales 32.44: 657–71.Google Scholar
Godelier, M. 1999. Chefferies et États, une approche anthropologique. In Ruby 1999, 1930.Google Scholar
Gsell, S. 1927. Histoire ancienne de l’Afrique du Nord, t. V. Les royaumes indigènes. Organisation sociale, politique et économique. Paris: Librairie Hachette.Google Scholar
Harris, M. 1995. Anthropology and postmodernism. In Murphy, M.F. and Margolis, M.L. (eds), Science, Materialism and the Study of Culture. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 6277.Google Scholar
Johnson, A.W. and Earle, T. 2000. The Evolution of Human Societies from Foraging Group to Agrarian State. Second Edition. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kallala, N. 2002. Archéologie romaine et colonisation en Afrique: Enjeux et pratiques. (L’exemple du Kef (Sicca Veneria) et de sa région, dans le nord-ouest de la Tunisie). Africa 19: 5781.Google Scholar
Kallala, N. and Sanmartí, J. (eds). 2011. Althiburos I. La fouille dans l’aire du capitole et dans la nécopole méridionale (Documenta 18). Tarragona: Institut Català d’Arqueologia Clàssica.Google Scholar
Kallala, N., Sanmartí, J., Jornet, R., Belarte, M.C., Canela, J., Chérif, S., Campillo, J., Montanero, D., Miniaoui, S., Bermúdez, X., Fadrique, T., Revilla, V., Ramon, J. and Ben Moussa, M. 2014. La nécropole mégalithique de la région d’Athiburos, dans le massif du Ksour (Gouvernorat du Kef, Tunisie). Fouille de trois monuments. Antiquités africaines 50: 1552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kallala, N., Sanmartí, J. and Belarte, M.C. (eds). 2016. Althiburos II. L’aire du capitole et la nécropole méridionale: Etudes (Documenta 18). Tarragona: Institut Català d’Arqueologia Clàssica.Google Scholar
Kallala, J., Sanmartí, J. and Belarte, M.C. (eds). 2018. Althiburos III. La nécropole protohistorique de Althiburos (massif du Ksour). Tarragona: Institut Català d’Arqueologia Clàssica.Google Scholar
Khanoussi, M. and Von Rummel, P. 2012. Simitthus (Chimtou, Tunesien). Vorbericht über die Aktivitäten 2009–2012. Mitteilungen des deutschen archäologischen Instituts, römische Abteilung 118: 179222.Google Scholar
Khanoussi, M., Ritter, S. and Von Rummel, P. 2005. The German-Tunisian Project at Dougga: First results of the excavations south of the Maison du Trifolium. Antiquités africaines 40–41: 4366.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 2001. Elite strategies and the spread of technological innovation: The spread of iron in the Bronze Age societies of Denmark and Southern Korea. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 20.4: 442–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klejn, L. 1993. La Arqueología soviética: Historia y teoría de una escuela desconocida. Barcelona: Crítica.Google Scholar
Kotula, T. 1976. Masynissa. Warsaw: PIW.Google Scholar
Lassère, J.-M. 2001. La tribu et le monarche. Antiquités africaines 37: 140–55.Google Scholar
Lévêque, P. 1986, L’émergence des pouvoirs structurés dans I’Afrique mineure de l’Age du Fer. In Gli interscambi culturali e socio-economici fra I’Africa settentrionale e I’Europa mediterranea, Atti del Congresso Internazionale di Amalfi (58 dicembre 1983). Naples: Istituto Universitario Orientale, 637–51.Google Scholar
Lévêque, P. 1999. Avant et après les Princes. L’Afrique mineure de l’Age du fer. In Ruby 1999, 153–64.Google Scholar
López Reyes, D. and Cantero, F.J. 2016. Agriculture et alimentation à partir de l’étude des restes de graines et des fruits. In Kallala et al. 2016, 449–90.Google Scholar
Lull, V. and Risch, R. 1995. El estado argárico. Verdolay 7: 97109.Google Scholar
Marcus, J. 1998. The peaks and valleys of ancient states: an extension of the dynamic model. In Feinman, and Marcus 1998, 5994.Google Scholar
Marcus, J. 2008. The archaeological evidence for social evolution. Annual Review of Anthropology 37: 251–66.Google Scholar
Marras, G., Doro, L., Floris, R. and Zedda, M. 2009. Il dolmen 102. Nota preliminare. In Tanda, G., Ghaki, M. and Marras, R. (eds), Storia dei paesaggi preistorici e protostorici nell’Alto Tell tunisino. Missioni 20022003. Cagliari: Università degli Studi di Cagliari and Ministère de la Culture et de la Sauvegarde du Patrimoine (Tunisia), 179200.Google Scholar
Mattingly, D.J. 2016. Who shaped Africa? The origins of urbanism and agriculture in Maghreb and Sahara. In Mugnai, N., Ray, N., and Nikolaus, J. (eds), De Africa Romaque: Merging Cultures across North Africa. London: Society for Libyan Studies, 1125.Google Scholar
Mattingly, D.J., Reynolds, T. and Dore, J. 2003. Synthesis of human activities in Fazzan. In Mattingly, D.J. (ed.), The Archaeology of Fazzan, vol. 1, Synthesis. London: Society for Libyan Studies, 327–73.Google Scholar
Parkinson, W.A. and Galaty, M.L. 2007. Secondary states in perspective: an integrated approach to state formation in the prehistoric Aegean. American Anthropologist 109.1: 113–29.Google Scholar
Portillo, M. and Albert, R.M. 2011. Husbandry practices and livestock dung at the Numidian site of Althiburos (el Médéina, Kef Governorate, northern Tunisia): the phytolith and spherulite evidence. Journal of Archaeological Science 38.12: 3224–33.Google Scholar
Portillo, M. and Albert, R.M. 2016. Les activités domestiques de la période numide à travers l’étude des micro-restes végétaux et fécaux: phytolithes et sphérolithes. In Kallala et al. 2016, 517–27.Google Scholar
Portillo, M., Valenzuela, S., and Albert, R.M. 2012. Domestic patterns in the Numidian site of Althiburos (northern Tunisia): The results from a combined study of animal bones, dung and plant remains. Quaternary International 275: 8496.Google Scholar
Ramon Torres, J. and Maraoui Telmini, B. 2011. Les sondages dans la zone 2. In Kallala and Sanmartí 2011, 153262.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1986. Peer polity interaction and social change. In Renfrew, C. and Cherry, J.F. (eds), Peer Polity Interaction and Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 118.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, A., Pavón, I. and Duque, D. 2010. Población, poblamiento y modelos sociales de la Primera Edad del Hierro en las cuencas extremeñas del Guadiana y Tajo. Arqueología Espacial 28: 4164.Google Scholar
Ruby, P. (ed.). 1999. Les princes de la protohistoire et l’émergence de l’État. Actes de la table ronde internationale de Naples. Naples/Rome: Collection du Centre Jean Bérad 17/Collection de l’École Française de Rome, 252.Google Scholar
Sanmartí, J. 2009. From the archaic states to romanization: A historical and evolutionary perspective on the Iberians. Catalan Historical Review 2: 932.Google Scholar
Sanmartí, J., Kallala, N., Belarte, M.C., Ramón, J., Maraoui, B., Jornet, R. and Miniaoui, S. 2012. Filling gaps in the Eastern Maghreb’s Protohistory: The Althiburos archaeological Project (el Kef, Tunisia). Journal of African Archaeology 10.1: 2144.Google Scholar
Sanmartí, J., Kallala, N., Jornet, R., Belarte, M.C., Canela, J., Chérif, S., Campillo, J., Montanero, D., Bermúdez, X., Fadrique, T., Revilla, V., Ramon, J., Ben Moussa, M. 2015. Roman Dolmens? The Megalithic necropolises of Eastern Maghreb revisited. In Díaz-Guardamino, M., García Sanjuán, L. and Wheatley, D. (eds), The Lives of Prehistoric Monuments in Iron Age, Roman, and Medieval Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 287304.Google Scholar
Sanmartí, J., Cruz Folch, I., Campillo, J. and Montanero, D. 2019. Numidian burial practices. In Gatto et al. 2019, 249–80.Google Scholar
Shanks, M. and Tilley, C. 1987. Social Theory and Archaeology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Smadja, E. 1983. Modes de contact, sociétés indigènes et formation de l’Etat numide au second siècle avant notre ère. In Modes de contacts el processus de transformations dans les sociétés anciennes, Actes du Colloque de Crotone (1981). Pisa/Rome: Scuola normale superiore di Pisa/École française de Rome, 685702.Google Scholar
Stambouli-Essassi, S., Roche, E. and Bouzid, S. 2007. Evolution of vegetation and climatic changes in North-Western Tunisia during the last 40 millennia. Geo-Eco-Trop 31: 171214.Google Scholar
Thébert, Y. 1992. Bulla Regia, Encyclopédie Berbère 11, 1647–53.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. 1989. A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. 1998. Sociocultural Evolution: Calculation and Contingency. Oxford: Blackwell Press.Google Scholar
Valenzuela-Lamas, S. 2016. Alimentation et élevage à Althiburos à partir des restes fauniques. In Kallala et al. 2016, 421–48.Google Scholar
Van der Veen, M. and Westley, B. 2010. Palaeoeconomic studies. In Mattingly, D.J. (ed.), The Archaeology of Fazzan. Volume 3, Excavations Carried out by C.M. Daniels. London: Society for Libyan Studies, 488522.Google Scholar
Wolf, E.R. 1966. Peasants. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
Wright, E.O. 1983. Giddens’s critique of Marxism. New Left Review 138: 1135.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×