Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:33:29.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2023

Terry D. Gill  and
Kinga Tibori-Szabó
Terry D. Gill
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Kinga Tibori-Szabó
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Use of Force and the International Legal System , pp. 413 - 442
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Alexandrov, S., Self-Defense against the Use of Force in International Law (Kluwer Law International, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, G. T., Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (Little, Brown, 1971)Google Scholar
Ambos, K., Treatise on International Criminal Law, Volume II: The Crimes and Sentencing (Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Augustine, , Political Writings, trans. M. W. Tkacz and D. Kries, ed. Fortin, E. L. and Kries, D. (Hackett, 1994)Google Scholar
Bartlett, C. J., Peace, War and the European Powers 1814–1914 (Palgrave Macmillan, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, J. and Smith, S., The Globalization of World Politics (Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Beaulac, S., The Power of Language in the Making of International Law: The Word Sovereignty in Bodin and Vattel and the Myth of Westphalia (Brill, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, A. J., Just Wars: From Cicero to Iraq (Polity Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Bigongiari, D. (ed.), The Political Ideas of St. Thomas Aquinas: Representative Selections (Hafner, 1969)Google Scholar
Boddens Hosang, J. F. R., ‘Force Protection, Unit Self-Defence and Personal Self-Defence: their Relationship to Rules of Engagement’, in Gill, T. D. and Fleck, D. (eds.), The Handbook of the International Law of Military Operations, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 476–501Google Scholar
Boddens Hosang, J. F. R., ‘Personal Self-Defence and Rules of Engagement’, in Gill, T. D. and Fleck, D. (eds.), The Handbook of the International Law of Military Operations, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 478–81Google Scholar
Boddens Hosang, J. F. R., Rules of Engagement and the International Law of Military Operations (Oxford University Press, 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boothby, W. H., The Law of Targeting (Oxford University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bothe, M., ‘The Law of Neutrality’, in Fleck, D. (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law (Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 550–80Google Scholar
Bowett, D. W., Self-Defence in International Law (Manchester University Press, 1958)Google Scholar
Bowett, D. W., United Nations Forces (Praeger, 1964)Google Scholar
Bowett, D. W., ‘The Use of Force for the Protection of Nationals Abroad’, in Cassese, A. (ed.), The Current Legal Regulation of the Use of Force (Nijhoff, 1986), pp. 39–56Google Scholar
Boyd, A., Fifteen Men on a Powder Keg: A History of the United Nations Security Council (Methuen, 1971)Google Scholar
Brownlie, I., ‘Humanitarian Intervention’, in Moore, J. N. (ed.), Law and Civil War in the Modern World (John Hopkins University Press, 1974), pp. 217–28Google Scholar
Brownlie, I., International Law and the Use of Force by States (Clarendon Press, 1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlie, I., Principles of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Brownlie, I., ‘Thoughts on the Kind-Hearted Gunman’, in Lillich, R. (ed.), Humanitarian Intervention and the United Nations (University of Virginia Press, 1973), pp. 139–48Google Scholar
Buchan, R. and Tsagourias, N., Regulating the Use of Force in International Law: Stability and Change (Edward Elgar, 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, S., Trench: A History of Trench Warfare on the Western Front (Osprey, 2014)Google Scholar
Carus, W. S., A Short History of Biological Warfare: From Pre-History to the 21st Century, Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction Occasional Paper No. 12 (National Defense University Press, 2017)Google Scholar
Cassese, A., International Law (Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Cathcart, B., ‘Command and Control in Military Operations’, in Gill, T. D. and Fleck, D. (eds.), The Handbook of the International Law of Military Operations, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 259–68Google Scholar
Chan, K., ‘The Ugandan-Tanzanian War – 1978–79’, in Ruys, T. et al. (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 255–68Google Scholar
Chang, L. and Kornbluh, P. (eds.), The Cuban Missile Crisis, 1962: A National Security Archive Documents Reader (New Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Chayes, A., The Cuban Missile Crisis (Oxford University Press, 1974)Google Scholar
Cheng, B., ‘The Destruction of KAL Flight KE007, and Article 3 Bis of the Chicago Convention’, in Cheng, C. J. (ed.), Studies in International Air Law: Collected Works of Bin Cheng (Brill-Nijhoff, 2018), pp. 343–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchill, R., Lowe, V. and Sander, A., The Law of the Sea (Manchester University Press, 2022)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C., Iron Kingdom: The Rise and Downfall of Prussia, 1600–1947 (Penguin Books, 2006)Google Scholar
Clark, C., The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914 (Penguin Books, 2012)Google Scholar
Clark, R. S., ‘Negotiations on the Rome Statute, 1995–98’, in Kreß, C. and Barriga, S. (eds.), The Crime of Aggression: A Commentary, vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, 2016), pp. 244–70Google Scholar
Clausewitz, C. von, On War, trans. J. J. Graham, rev. Maude, A. J. (Wordsworth, 1997)Google Scholar
Colbert, E., Retaliation in International Law (King’s Crown Press, 1948)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constantinou, A., The Right of Self-Defence under Customary International Law and Article 51 of the United Nations Charter (Sakkoulas, 2000)Google Scholar
Corten, O., Le droit contre la guerre: L’interdiction du recours à la force en droit international contemporain (Pedone, 2008)Google Scholar
Corten, O., The Law against War: The Prohibition on the Use of Force in Contemporary International Law (Hart, 2010)Google Scholar
Crawford, E. and Pert, A., International Humanitarian Law (Cambridge University Press, 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J., Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J., State Responsibility (Cambridge University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Amato, A., International Law: Process and Prospect (Transnational, 1987)Google Scholar
Darcy, S., ‘Revival of Classical Concepts? Retaliation and Reprisal’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 890–1Google Scholar
Dinstein, Y., Non-International Armed Conflicts in International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence, 6th ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doswald-Beck, L. (ed.), San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea (Cambridge University Press, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, R., ‘St. Augustine on Natural Law’, in Crowe, J. and Lee, C. Y. (eds.), Research Handbook on Natural Law Theory (Edward Elgar, 2019), pp. 57–75Google Scholar
Dubuisson, F. and Koutroulis, V., ‘The Yom Kippur War – 1973’, in Ruys, T. et al. (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 189–200Google Scholar
Ducheine, P., ‘Military Cyber Operations’, in Gill, T. D. and Fleck, D. (eds.), The Handbook of the International Law of Military Operations, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 456–75Google Scholar
Dunstan, S., Entebbe: The Most Daring Raid of Israel’s Special Forces (Rosen, 2011)Google Scholar
Ferrell, R. H., Peace in Their Time: The Origins of the Kellogg-Briand Pact (Yale University Press, 1952)Google Scholar
Fink, M. D., ‘The Application of Force in Maritime Interception Operations’, in Maritime Interception and the Law of Naval Operations: A Study of Legal Bases and Legal Regimes in Maritime Interception Operations (Springer, 2018), pp. 191–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiore, P., Nouveau droit international public suivant les besoins de la civilisation moderne, 2nd ed., trans. Antoine, C., vol. 1 (A. Durant et Pedone-Lauriel, 1885)Google Scholar
Fox, G. H., ‘Intervention by Invitation’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 816–40Google Scholar
Fox, G. H., ‘The Vietnamese Intervention in Cambodia – 1978’, in Ruys, T. et al. (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 242–54Google Scholar
Franchini, D. and Tzanakopoulos, A., ‘The Kosovo Crisis – 1999’, in Ruys, T. et al. (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 594–622Google Scholar
Franck, T. M., Recourse to Force: State Action against Threats and Armed Attacks (Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, L., ‘The First Two Generations of Nuclear Strategists’, in Paret, P. (ed.), Makers of Modern Strategy: From Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age (Princeton University Press, 1986), pp. 735–78Google Scholar
Funck-Brentano, T. and Sorel, A., Précis du droit des gens (Plon, 1887)Google Scholar
Gardam, J., Necessity, Proportionality and the Use of Force by States (Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavouneli, M., Functional Jurisdiction in the Law of the Sea (Nijhoff, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazzini, T., The Changing Rules on the Use of Force in International Law (Manchester University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Gentili, A., De jure belli libri tres (Clarendon Press, 1933)Google Scholar
Gestri, M., ‘Sanctions Imposed by the European Union: Legal and Institutional Aspects’, in Ronzitti, N. (ed.), Coercive Diplomacy, Sanctions and International Law (Brill-Nijhoff, 2016), pp. 70–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, T. D., ‘The Jus Ad Bellum Anno 2040: An Essay on Possible Trends and Challenges’, in Waxman, M. and Oakley, T. (eds.), The Future Law of Armed Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2022), pp. 25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, T. D., ‘Non-Intervention in the Cyber Context’, in Ziolkowski, K. (ed.) Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace (NATO CCD COE Publications, 2013), pp. 217–38Google Scholar
Gill, T. D., ‘Peace Operations’, in Gill, T. D. and Fleck, D. (eds.), The Handbook of the International Law of Military Operations, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 153–60Google Scholar
Gill, T. D., ‘The Security Council’, in Zyberi, G. (ed.) An Institutional Approach to the Responsibility to Protect (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 83–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, T. D., ‘Some Considerations Concerning the Role of the Ius ad Bellum in Targeting’, in Ducheine, P. A. L., Schmitt, M. N. and Osinga, F. P. B. (eds.), Targeting: The Challenges of Modern Warfare (Springer, 2016), pp. 101–19Google Scholar
Gill, T. D., ‘The Temporal Dimension of Self-Defence: Anticipation, Pre-emption, Prevention and Immediacy’, in Schmitt, M. N. and Pejić, J. (eds.), International Law and Armed Conflict: Exploring the Faultlines (Nijhoff, 2007), pp. 113–55Google Scholar
Gill, T. D., ‘When Does Self-Defence End?’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 737–51Google Scholar
Gill, T. D., Haaster, J . V. and Roorda, M., ‘Some Legal and Operational Considerations Regarding Remote Warfare: Drones and Cyber Warfare Revisited’, in Ohlin, J. D. (ed.), Research Handbook on Remote Warfare (Edward Elgar, 2019), pp. 298–334Google Scholar
Gill, T. D. and Fleck, D. (eds.), The Handbook of the International Law of Military Operations, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2015)Google Scholar
Gill, T. D. et al. (eds.), Leuven Manual on the International Law Applicable to Peace Operations (Cambridge University Press, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodrich, L. M., The United Nations and the Maintenance of International Peace and Security (Brookings Institution, 1955)Google Scholar
Goodrich, L., Hambro, E. and Simons, A. P., Charter of the United Nations: Commentary and Documents (Columbia University Press, 1969)Google Scholar
Graebner, N. A. and Bennett, E. E., The Versailles Treaty and Its Legacy: The Failure of the Wilsonian Vision (Cambridge University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Gray, C., ‘The Conflict in Georgia – 2008’, in Ruys, T. and Corten, O. (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 712–28Google Scholar
Gray, C., International Law and the Use of Force (Oxford University Press, 2018)Google Scholar
Greenwood, C., ‘Legality of the Use of Force: Iraq in 2003’, in Bothe, M., O’Connell, M. E. and Ronzitti, N. (eds.), Redefining Sovereignty: The Use of Force after the Cold War (Transnational, 2005), pp. 399–404Google Scholar
Greenwood, C., ‘Self-Defence and the Conduct of International Armed Conflict’, in Dinstein, Y. (ed.), International Law in a Time of Perplexity: Essays in Honour of Shabtai Rosenne (Nijhoff, 1989), pp. 273–88Google Scholar
Grewe, W. G., The Epochs of International Law (De Gruyter, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, D., Sovereignty: The Origin and Future of a Political and Legal Concept (Columbia University Press, 2015)Google Scholar
Grotius, H., De jure belli ac pacis libri tres (Oceana, 1964)Google Scholar
Grunden, W. E., ‘No Retaliation in Kind: Japanese Chemical Warfare Policy in World War II’, in Friedrich, B. et al. (eds.), One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research, Deployment, Consequences (Springer, 2017), pp. 259–71Google Scholar
Guilfoyle, D., Shipping Interdiction and the Law of the Sea (Cambridge University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttry, A. de, ‘The Iran-Iraq War – 1980–88’, in Ruys, T. and Corten, O. (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 315–28Google Scholar
Hajjami, N., ‘The Intervention of the United States and Other Eastern Caribbean States in Grenada – 1983’, in Ruys, T. and Corten, O. (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 385–94Google Scholar
Hall, W. E., International Law (Clarendon Press, 1880)Google Scholar
Halleck, H. W., International Law or Rules Regulating the Intercourse of States in Peace and War (H. H. Bancroft, 1861)Google Scholar
Hathaway, O. A. and Shapiro, S. J., The Internationalists and Their Plan to Outlaw War (Penguin Books, 2018)Google Scholar
Hay, B. L., Nazi-Looted Art and the Law: The American Cases (Springer, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, N. (ed.), National Military Manuals on the Law of Armed Conflict (Forum for International Criminal and Humanitarian Law, 2010)Google Scholar
Heffter, A. W., Le droit international de l’Europe (H. W. Muller / A. Cotillon et Cie, 1883)Google Scholar
Henderson, C., The Use of Force and International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henig, R., The Peace That Never Was: A History of the League of Nations (Haus, 2019)Google Scholar
Henkin, L., International Law: Politics and Values (Nijhoff, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henkin, L., ‘The Use of Force: Law and US Policy’, in Henkin, L. et al., Right v. Might. International Law and the Use of Force, 2nd ed. (Council on Foreign Relations Press, 1991), pp. 37–69Google Scholar
Henry, E., ‘The Falklands/Malvinas War – 1982’, in Ruys, T. and Corten, O. (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 361–72Google Scholar
Heraclides, A. and Dialla, A., Humanitarian Intervention in the Long Nineteenth Century: Setting the Precedent (Manchester University Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hessbruegge, J. A., Human Rights and Personal Self-Defense in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, R., The Development of International Law through the Political Organs of the United Nations (Oxford University Press, 1963)Google Scholar
Higgins, R., Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Hiscocks, R., The Security Council: A Study in Adolescence (Longman, 1973)Google Scholar
Hofer, A., ‘The Suez Crisis – 1956’, in Ruys, T. and Corten, O. (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 36–47Google Scholar
Howard, M., The First World War. A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Ilgen, T. L. (ed.), Reconfigured Sovereignty: Multi-Layered Governance in the Global Age (Ashgate, 2003)Google Scholar
Jennings, R. and Watts, A., Oppenheim’s International Law (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Jessup, P. C., A Modern Law of Nations: An Introduction (Macmillan, 1948)Google Scholar
Jones, M. A., The Limits of Liberty: American History 1607–1980 (Oxford University Press, 1983)Google Scholar
Joyner, D. H., ‘The Implications of the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction for the Prohibition of the Use of Force’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 1034–56Google Scholar
Keegan, J., The First World War (Bodley Head, 2014)Google Scholar
Keegan, J., The Second World War (Pimlico, 1997)Google Scholar
Kleffner, J., ‘Scope of Application of International Humanitarian Law’, in Fleck, D. (ed.) The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3rd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2013), pp.50–80Google Scholar
Klein, N., Maritime Security and the Law of the Sea (Oxford University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolesnik, D. N., ‘The Development of the Right of Self-Defence’, in Butler, W. E. (ed.), The Non-Use of Force in International Law (Nijhoff, 1989), pp. 153–9Google Scholar
Kreß, C., ‘The State Conduct Element’, in Kreß, C. and Barriga, S. (eds.), The Crime of Aggression: A Commentary, vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, 2017), pp. 412–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreß, C. and Nußberger, B., ‘The Entebbe Raid – 1976’, in Ruys, T. and Corten, O. (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 220–33Google Scholar
Kritsiotis, D., ‘The Intervention of India into (East) Pakistan’, in Ruys, T. and Corten, O. (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 169–88Google Scholar
Laffan, R. G. D., Select Documents of European History: 800–1492 (Henry Holt, 1929)Google Scholar
Lagerwall, A., ‘Threats and Actual Military Strikes against Syria – 2013 and 2017’, in Ruys, T. and Corten, O. (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 828–54Google Scholar
Laity, P., The British Peace Movement (Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H., The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford University Press, orig. pub. 1933, repr. 2011)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H. (ed.), Oppenheim, L., International Law, vol 2 (Longmans Green., 1952)Google Scholar
Lieblich, E., ‘On the Continuous and Concurrent Applicability of Ad Bellum and In Bello Proportionality’, in Kreß, C. and Lawless, R. (eds.), Necessity and Proportionality in International Peace and Security Law (Oxford University Press, 2020), pp. 41–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillich, R., ‘Humanitarian Intervention: A Reply to Ian Brownlie and a Plea for Constructive Alternatives’, in Moore, J. N. (ed.) Law and Civil War in the Modern World (John Hopkins Press, 1974), pp. 229–51Google Scholar
Lindell, B., Multi-Criteria Analysis in Legal Reasoning (Edward Elgar, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longobardo, M., ‘Robust Peacekeeping Mandates: An Assessment in Light of Jus Post Bellum’, in Stahn, C. and Iverson, J. (eds.), Just Peace after Conflict: Jus Post Bellum and the Justice of Peace (Oxford University Press, 2020)Google Scholar
Lubell, N., Extraterritorial Use of Force against Non-State Actors (Oxford University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, N., The Prince (Collector’s Library, 2004)Google Scholar
MacMillan, M., Paris 1919: Six Months That Changed the World (Random House, 2003)Google Scholar
Mamiani, Count, Rights of Nations or, The New Law of European States Applied to the Affairs of Italy (W. Jeffs, 1860)Google Scholar
Mattox, J. M., Saint Augustine and the Theory of Just War (Continuum, 2006)Google Scholar
McDougal, M. S. and Feliciano, F. P., Law and Minimum World Public Order: The Legal Regulation of International Coercion (Yale University Press, 1961)Google Scholar
McGoldrick, D., From ‘9-11’ to the ‘Iraq War 2003’: International Law in an Age of Complexity (Hart, 2004)Google Scholar
Melzer, N. and Gaggioli, G., ‘Conceptual Distinction and Overlaps between Law Enforcement and the Conduct of Hostilities’, in Gill, T. D. and Fleck, D. (eds.), The Handbook of the International Law of Military Operations, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 63–92Google Scholar
Meselson, M., ‘From Charles and Francis Darwin to Richard Nixon: The Origin and Termination of Anti-Plant Chemical Warfare in Vietnam’, in Friedrich, B. et al. (eds.), One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research, Deployment, Consequences (Springer, 2017), pp. 335–48Google Scholar
Miller, D. H., The Peace Pact of Paris: A Study of the Briand-Kellogg Treaty (G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1928)Google Scholar
Mlodoch, K., ‘The Indelible Smell of Apples: Poison Gas Survivors in Halabja, Kurdistan-Iraq, and Their Struggle for Recognition’, in Friedrich, B. et al. (eds.), One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research, Deployment, Consequences (Springer, 2017), pp. 349–62Google Scholar
Moir, L., ‘Action against Host States of Terrorist Groups’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 720–30Google Scholar
Moir, L., ‘Israeli Airstrikes in Syria – 2003 and 2007’, in Ruys, T. and Corten, O. (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 662–72Google Scholar
Moir, L., The Law of Internal Armed Conflict (Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C., Freedom of Navigation and the Law of the Sea (Routledge, 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C., ‘The Use of Force’, in Warner, R. and Kaye, S. (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Maritime Regulation and Enforcement (Routledge, 2015), pp. 27–40Google Scholar
Moore, J. N. (ed.), Law and Civil War in the Modern World (John Hopkins University Press, 1974)Google Scholar
Morris, S. J., Why Vietnam Invaded Cambodia: Political Culture and the Causes of War (Stanford University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mougel, N., World War I Casualties (REPERES – Centre européen Robert Schuman, 2011)Google Scholar
Mueller, K. P. et al., Striking First: Preemptive and Preventive Attack in U.S. National Security Policy (RAND Project Air Force, 2006)Google Scholar
Myjer, E. P. J. and White, N. D., ‘Peace Operations Conducted by Regional Organizations and Arrangements’, in Gill, T. D. and Fleck, D. (eds.), The Handbook of the International Law of Military Operations, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 185–209Google Scholar
Neff, S. C., ‘A Short History of International Law’, in Evans, M. D. (ed.) International Law (Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 48–9Google Scholar
Neff, S. C., War and the Law of Nations: General History (Cambridge University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nollkaemper, A. and Plakokefalos, I. (eds.), Principles of Shared Responsibility in International Law: An Appraisal of the State of the Art (Cambridge University Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, A., A Concise History of the Law of Nations (Macmillan, 1947)Google Scholar
O’Connell, M. E., ‘The Crisis in Ukraine – 2014’, in Ruys, T. and Corten, O. (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 855–72Google Scholar
O’Connell, M. E., ‘The Prohibition on the Use of Force’, in White, N. D. and Henderson, C. (eds.), Research Handbook on International Conflict and Security Law (Edward Elgar, 2013), pp. 89–119Google Scholar
Ohlin, J. D. (ed.), Research Handbook on Remote Warfare (Edward Elgar, 2019)Google Scholar
Oppenheim, L. F. L., International Law: A Treatise, vol. 1 (Longmans Green, 1905)Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, A., ‘The Cuban Missile Crisis – 1962’, in Ruys, T. and Corten, O. (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 99–106.Google Scholar
Pagden, A. andLawrance, J. (eds.), Vitoria, , Political Writings (Cambridge University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Pellet, A., ‘The Definition of Responsibility under International Law’, in Crawford, J., Pellet, A. and Olleson, S. (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 3–16Google Scholar
Phillimore, R., Commentaries upon International Law, vol. 1 (W. Benning, 1854)Google Scholar
Phillimore, R., Commentaries upon International Law, vol. 1 (Butterworth, 1879)Google Scholar
Phillimore, R., Commentaries upon International Law, vol. 3 (W. Benning, 1857)Google Scholar
Phillips, C., ‘Syria’, in Arimatsu, L. and Choudhury, M. (eds.), The Legal Classification of the Armed Conflicts in Syria, Yemen and Libya (Chatham House, 2014), pp. 7–19Google Scholar
Phillipson, C., The International Law and Custom of Ancient Greece and Rome, vol. 2 (Macmillan, 1911)Google Scholar
Pijpers, B. M. J., ‘Influence Operations in Cyberspace’ (PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, 19 January 2022) https://tinyurl.com/yckx2xasGoogle Scholar
Pouw, E., ‘Some Thoughts on the Notion of “Control” in “Choosing” the Paradigm of Hostilities or Law Enforcement as the Governing Legal Framework in the Use of Force in Military Operations: Is There Any’, in Bartels, R. et al. (eds.), Military Operations and the Notion of Control under International Law: Lieber Amicorum Terry D. Gill (Springer, 2021), pp. 195–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pradier-Fodéré, P. L., Traité de droit international public européen et américain, suivant le progrès de la science et de la pratique contemporaines, vol. 1 (A. Durand et Pedone-Lauriel, 1885)Google Scholar
Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: John F. Kennedy, 1962 (US Government Printing Office, 1963)Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S. von, De Jjre naturae et gentium libri octo, vol. 2 (Clarendon Press, 1934)Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S. von, On the Duty of Man and Citizen According to Natural Law (Cambridge University Press, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quigley, J., ‘The Six Day War – 1967’, in Ruys, T. and Corten, O. (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 131–42Google Scholar
Quigley, J., The Six Day War and Israeli Self-Defense (Cambridge University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Randelzhofer, A. and Dörr, O., ‘Article 2 (4)’, in Simma, B. et al. (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations. A Commentary, vol. 1 (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Reichberg, G. M., Syse, H. and Begby, E., The Ethics of War: Classic and Contemporary Readings (Blackwell, 2006)Google Scholar
Roberts, A. and Sivakumaran, S., ‘The Theory and Reality of the Sources of International Law’, in Evans, M. D. (ed.), International Law (Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 92–6Google Scholar
Rodin, D. and Shue, H., Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Ronzitti, N., ‘Sanctions as Instruments of Coercive Diplomacy: An International Law Perspective’, in Ronzitti, N. (ed.), Coercive Diplomacy, Sanctions and International Law (Brill-Nijhoff, 2016), pp. 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, B., ‘The Illegality of Pro-Democratic Invasion Pacts’, in Fox, G. and Roth, B. (eds.), Democratic Governance and International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 328–42Google Scholar
Ruys, T., ‘Armed Attack’ and Article 51 of the UN Charter: Evolution in Customary Law and Practice (Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Ruys, T., ‘Israel’s Airstrike against Iraq’s Osiraq Nuclear Reactor – 1981’, in Ruys, T. and Corten, O. (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 329–41Google Scholar
Ruys, T., ‘Sanctions, Retortions and Countermeasures: Concepts and International Legal Framework’, in van den Herik, L. (ed.), Research Handbook on UN Sanctions and International Law (Edward Elgar, 2016), pp. 19–51Google Scholar
Schabas, W. A., An Introduction to the International Criminal Court (Cambridge University Press, 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabas, W., The Trial of the Kaiser (Oxford University Press, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, O., International Law in Theory and Practice (Nijhoff, 1991)Google Scholar
Schmaltz, F., ‘Chemical Weapons Research on Soldiers and Concentration Camp Inmates in Nazi Germany’, in Friedrich, B. et al. (eds.), One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research, Deployment, Consequences (Springer, 2017), pp. 229–58Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. N., ‘Air Law and Military Operations’, in Gill, T. D. and Fleck, D. (eds.), The Handbook of the International Law of Military Operations, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 354–74Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. N., ‘Targeting in Operational Law’, in Gill, T. D. and Fleck, D. (eds.), The Handbook of the International Law of Military Operations, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 269–306Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. N. (ed.) Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations (Cambridge University Press, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrijver, N., ‘The Ban on the Use of Force in the UN Charter’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 466–87.Google Scholar
Scobbie, I., ‘War’, in d’Aspremont, J. and Singh, S. (eds.), Concepts for International Law: Contributions to Disciplinary Thought (Edward Elgar, 2019), pp. 900–12Google Scholar
Scott, J. S. (ed.), Selections from Three Works of Francisco Suarez (Clarendon Press, 1944)Google Scholar
Sellars, K., ‘The First World War, Wilhelm II and Article 227: The Origin of the Idea of “Aggression” in International Criminal Law’, in Kreß, C. and Barriga, S. (eds.), The Crime of Aggression: A Commentary, vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, 2017), pp. 21–48Google Scholar
Shaw, M. N., International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simma, B. et al. (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, 2 vols. (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Siracusa, J. M., Nuclear Weapons: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivakumaran, S., The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Smuts, J. C., The League of Nations: A Practical Suggestion (Hodder & Stoughton, 1918)Google Scholar
Stone, J., Aggression and World Order (University of California Press, 1958)Google Scholar
Stowel, l E. C., Intervention in International Law (John Byrne, 1921)Google Scholar
Taylor, A. J. P., The Struggle for Mastery in Europe 1848–1918 (Oxford University Press, 1954)Google Scholar
Teson, F., Humanitarian Intervention: An Inquiry into Law and Morality (Transnational, 1997)Google Scholar
Thomas, H., The Spanish Civil War (Penguin Books, 1965)Google Scholar
Tibori-Szabó, K., Anticipatory Action in Self-Defence: Essence and Limits under International Law (Springer, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tibori-Szabó, K., ‘Control and the Right to Self-Defence against Non-State Actors’, in Bartels, R. et al. (eds.), Military Operations and the Notion of Control under International Law: Lieber Amicorum Terry D. Gill (Springer, 2021), pp. 83–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tibori-Szabó, K., ‘The “Unwilling and Unable” Test and the Law of Self-Defence’, in Paulussen, C. et al. (eds.), Fundamental Rights in International and European Law (Springer, 2016), pp. 73–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trapp, R., ‘The Use of Chemical Weapons in Syria: Implications and Consequences’, in Friedrich, B. et al. (eds.), One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research, Deployment, Consequences (Springer, 2017), pp. 363–75Google Scholar
Trent, M., Over the Line: The Implications of China’s ADIZ Intrusions in Northeast Asia (American Federation of Scientists, 2020)Google Scholar
Tsagourias, N., ‘The US Intervention in Panama – 1989’, in Ruys, T. and Corten, O. (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 426–38Google Scholar
Tsagourias, N. and Buchan, R. (eds.), Research Handbook on International Law and Cyberspace (Edward Elgar, 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twiss, T., Law of Nations Considered as Independent Political Communities: On the Rights and Duties of Nations in Time of Peace (Oxford University Press, 1860)Google Scholar
Twiss, T., Law of Nations Considered as Independent Political Communities: On the Rights and Duties of Nations in Time of War (Oxford University Press, 1863)Google Scholar
Tzanakopoulos, A., Disobeying the Security Council: Countermeasures against Wrongful Sanctions (Oxford University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upcher, J., Neutrality in Contemporary International Law (Oxford University Press, 2020)Google Scholar
Vandenberg, A. H. Jr, The Private Papers of Senator Vandenberg (Houghton Mifflin, 1952)Google Scholar
Vasquez, J. A., Contagion and War: Lessons from the First World War (Cambridge University Press, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vattel, E. de, The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law: Applied to the Conduct and to the Affairs of Nations and of Sovereigns (Oceana, 1964)Google Scholar
Visscher, C. de, Theory and Reality in Public International Law (Princeton University Press, 1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, N. (ed.), Sovereignty in Transition (Hart, 2003)Google Scholar
Walters, F. P., A History of the League of Nations (Oxford University Press, 1965)Google Scholar
Wampach, C., Armed Reprisals from Medieval Times to 1945 (Nomos, 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, A. C., The Paris Pact: A Textbook for Schools and Colleges (Harcourt Brace, 1932)Google Scholar
Weaver, R., The Hundred Thousand Sons of St Louis: The French Campaign in Spain, April–October 1823 (Helion 2018)Google Scholar
Weinberg, G. L., World War II: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Weller, M., The Crisis in Kosovo, 1989–1999: From the Dissolution of Yugoslavia to Rambouillet and the Outbreak of Hostilities (International Documents & Analysis, 1999)Google Scholar
Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar
Wet, E. de, The Chapter VII Powers of the United Nations Security Council (Hart, 2004)Google Scholar
Wheaton, H., Elements of International Law: With a Sketch of the History of the Science (Carey, Lea & Blanchard, 1836)Google Scholar
Wheeler, J., Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society (Oxford University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, N. D., Keeping the Peace (Manchester University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
White, N. D. and Abass, A., ‘Countermeasures and Sanctions’, in Evans, M. D. (ed.), International Law (Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 537–62Google Scholar
Williams, P., ‘The R2P Protection of Civilians and UN Peacekeeping Operations’, in Bellamy, A. J. and Dunne, T. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect (Oxford University Press, 2016), pp. 524–44.Google Scholar
Wolff, C., Law of Nations Treated According to the Scientific Method (Liberty Fund, 2017)Google Scholar
Woolsey, T. D., Introduction to the Study of International Law (Sampson Low, Marston, Searle & Rivington, 1879)Google Scholar
Zyberi, G. (ed.) An Institutional Approach to the Responsibility to Protect (Cambridge University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Secondary Sources

‘U.S. Drone Strike in Iraq Kills Iranian Military Leader Qasem Soleimani’ (2020) 114 American Journal of International Law 313–23Google Scholar
Abi-Saab, G., ‘Cours général de droit international public’ (1987) 207 Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law 9–463Google Scholar
Almond, H. H. Jr, ‘Demilitarization and Arms Control: Antarctica’ (1985) 17 Case Western Journal of International Law 229–84Google Scholar
Anderson, K., Reisner, D. and Waxman, M., ‘Adapting the Law of Armed Conflict to Autonomous Weapons Systems’ (2014) 90 International Law Studies 386–411Google Scholar
Aspremont, J. d’ et al., ‘Sharing Responsibility Between Non-State Actors and States in International Law’ (2015) 62(1) Netherlands International Law Review 49–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badr, G. M., ‘The Exculpatory Effect of Self-Defence in State Responsibility’ (1980) 10 Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 1–28Google Scholar
Baker, S. G., ‘Terrorism and the Inherent Right of Self-Defence’ (1987) 10 Houston Journal of International Law 25–49Google Scholar
Barras, V. and Greub, G., ‘History of Biological Warfare and Bioterrorism’ (2014) 20 Clinical Microbiology and Infection 497–502CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beer, A. C. de and Tladi, D., ‘The Use of Force against Syria in Response to Alleged Use of Chemical Weapons by Syria: A Return to Humanitarian Intervention?’ (2019) 79 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 205–39Google Scholar
Beres, L. R., ‘After the Gulf War: Israel, Preemption and Anticipatory Self-Defence’ (1991) 13 Houston Journal of International Law 259–80Google Scholar
Bethlehem, D., ‘Self-Defence against an Imminent or Actual Armed Attack by Nonstate Actors’ (2012) 106 American Journal of International Law 770–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyerlin, U., ‘Die israelische Befreiungsaktion von Entebbe in völkerrechtlicher Sicht’ (1977) 37 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 213–43Google Scholar
Blokker, N., ‘Is the Authorization Authorized? Powers and Practice of the UN Security Council to Authorize the Use of Force by “Coalitions of the Able and Willing”’ (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law 541–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, Y. Z., ‘State Response to Acts of Terrorism’ (1976) 19 German Yearbook of International Law 223–37Google Scholar
Boothby, W.H., ‘Space Weapons and the Law’ (2017) 93 International Law Studies 180–214Google Scholar
Bowett, D., ‘Reprisals Involving Recourse to Armed Force’ (1972) 66 American Journal of International Law 1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockmeier, S., Stuenkel, O. and Tourinho, M., ‘The Impact of the Libya Intervention Debates on Norms of Protection’ (2016) 30(1) Journal of Global Society 113–33Google Scholar
Brooks, R., ‘Duck-Rabbits and Drones: Legal Indeterminacy in the War on Terror’ (2014) 25 Stanford Law and Policy Review 301–16Google Scholar
Brunnée, J. and Toope, S. J., ‘Self-Defence against Non-State Actors: Are Powerful States Willing but Unable to Change International Law?’ (2018) 67 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 263–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butchard, P. M., ‘Back to San Francisco: Explaining the Inherent Contradictions of Art. 2 (4) of the Charter’ (2018) 23 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 229–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calamita, N. J., ‘Sanctions, Countermeasures, and the Iranian Nuclear Issue’ (2009) 42 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1393–442Google Scholar
Campbell, J. S., ‘The Cuban Missile Crisis and the U.N. Charter: An Analysis of the United States Position’ (1963) 16 Stanford Law Review 160–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnazza Amari, G., ‘Nouvel exposé du principe de non-intervention (première partie)’ (1873) 5 Revue de droit international et de législation comparée 352–89Google Scholar
Carter, A. B., ‘Current and Future Military Uses of Space’ (1986) 489 Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 5–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, B., ‘Properly Speaking, Only Celestial Bodies Have Been Reserved for Use Exclusively for Peaceful (Non-Military) Purposes, but Not Outer Void Space’ (2000) 75 International Law Studies 81–117Google Scholar
Christakis, T., ‘Challenging the “Unwilling and Unable” Test’ (2017) 77 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 19–22Google Scholar
Clapham, A., ‘Booty, Bounty, Blockade and Prize: Time to Reevaluate the Law’ (2021) 97 International Law Studies 1200–68Google Scholar
Clarke, M., ‘China’s Application of the “Three Warfares” in the South China Sea and Xinjiang’ (2019) 63 Orbis 187–208Google Scholar
Cohen, G., ‘Mixing Oil and Water? The Interaction between jus ad bellum and jus in bello during Armed Conflicts’ (2022) Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 352–90, https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2022.2059154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corten, O., ‘The “Unwilling or Unable” Test: Has It Been, and Could It Be, Accepted?’ (2016) 29 Leiden Journal of International Law 777–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corten, O. and Dubuisson, F., ‘Opération “liberté immuable”: Une extension abusive du concept de légitime défense’ (2002) 106 Revue générale de droit international public 51–77Google Scholar
D’Amato, A., ‘Israel’s Air Strike against the Osiraq Reactor: A Retrospective’ (1996) 10 Temple International and Comparative Law Journal 259–60Google Scholar
Deeks, A., ‘Unwilling or Unable: Toward a Normative Framework for Extraterritorial Self-Defense’ (2012) 52 Virginia Journal of International Law 483–550Google Scholar
Doswald Beck, L., ‘The Legal Validity of Military Intervention by Invitation of the Government’ (1985) 56 British Yearbook of International Law 189–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, P. J., ‘Can We Starve the Civilians? Exploring the Dichotomy between the Traditional Law of Maritime Blockade and Humanitarian Initiative’ (2019) 95 International Law Studies 302–21Google Scholar
Egerton, G., ‘Collective Security as Political Myth: Liberal Internationalism and the League of Nations in Politics and History’ (1983) 5 International History Review 496–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, R. A., ‘The Beirut Raid and the International Law of Retaliation’ (1969) 63 American Journal of International Law 415–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, G., ‘Le bombardement par Israël d’un réacteur nucléaire irakien’ (1981) 27 Annuaire français de droit international 147–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, T., Aunesluoma, J. and Makko, A., ‘Neutrality and Nonalignment in World Politics during the Cold War’ (2016) 18(4) Journal of Cold War Studies 4–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleck, D., ‘Rules of Engagement for Maritime Forces and the Limitation of the Use of Force under the UN Charter’ (1988) 31 German Yearbook of International Law 165–86Google Scholar
Galdorisi, G. and Kaufman, A., ‘Military Activities in the Exclusive Economic Zone: Preventing Uncertainty and Defusing Conflict’ (2002) 32 California Western International Law Journal 253–302Google Scholar
Gardiner, M., ‘Piracy Prosecutions in National Courts’ (2012) 10 Journal of International Criminal Justice 797–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. N., ‘Neither Bush Nor the “Jurisprudes”’ (2003) 97 American Journal of International Law 585–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiß, R., ‘Civil Aircraft as Weapons of Large-Scale Destruction: Countermeasures, Article 3BIS of the Chicago Convention, and the Newly Adopted German “Luftsicherheitsgesetz”’ (2005) 27(1) Michigan Journal of International Law 227–56Google Scholar
Gill, T. D., ‘The Forcible Protection, Affirmation and Exercise of Rights under Contemporary International Law’ (1992) 23 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 105–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, T. D., ‘Humanitaire Interventie: Rechtmatigheid, Rechtvaardigheid en Legitimiteit’ (2001) 94 Militair Rechtelijk Tijdschrift 221–41Google Scholar
Gill, T. D., ‘Humanitarian Intervention: Legality, Justice and Legitimacy’ (2005) 1 Global Yearbook of International Law 51–76Google Scholar
Gill, T. D., ‘Legal and Some Political Limitations on the Power of the UN Security Council to Exercise its Enforcement Powers under Chapter VII of the Charter’ (1995) 26 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 33–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, T. D., ‘Rethinking the Scope of International Humanitarian Law and Its Place in the International Legal System’ (2022) 60 Revue de droit militaire et de droit de la guerre / The Military Law and Law of War Review 58–70Google Scholar
Gill, T. D., ‘Some Reflections on the Threshold for International Armed Conflict and on the Application of the Law of Armed Conflict in Any Armed Conflict’ (2022) 99 International Law Studies 698–730Google Scholar
Gill, T. D., ‘Some Thoughts on the Relationship between International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law: A Plea for Mutual Respect and a Common-Sense Approach’ (2013) 16 Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 251–66Google Scholar
Gill, T. D. and Tibori-Szabó, K., ‘Twelve Key Questions on Self-Defense against Non-State Actors’ (2019) 95 International Law Studies 467–505Google Scholar
Gordon, E., ‘Article 2(4) in Historical Context’ (1985) 10 Yale Journal of International Law 271–8Google Scholar
Green, J. A., ‘The Article 51 Reporting Requirement for Self-Defense Actions’ (2015) 55 Virginia Journal of International Law 563–624Google Scholar
Green, J. A., ‘Fluctuating Evidentiary Standards for Self-Defence in the International Court of Justice’ (2009) 58 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 163–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. A., ‘Questioning the Peremptory Status of the Prohibition of the Use of Force’ (2011) 32 Michigan Journal of International Law 215–57Google Scholar
Green, J. A., Henderson, C. and Ruys, T., ‘Russia’s Attack on Ukraine and the jus ad bellum’ (2022) 9 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 4–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, C., ‘International Law and the Pre-emptive Use of Force: Afghanistan, Al-Qaida, and Iraq’ (2003) 4 San Diego International Law Journal 7–38Google Scholar
Greenwood, C., ‘The Relationship between the ius ad bellum and the ius in bello’ (1983) 9 Review of International Studies 221–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, L. M., ‘The Legal Implications of Israel’s 1982 Invasion into Lebanon’ (1983) 13 California Western International Law Journal 458–92Google Scholar
Hafner, G., ‘Report on Intervention by Invitation’ (2009) 73 Institute of International Law Yearbook 302–39Google Scholar
Haines, S., ‘War at Sea: Nineteenth-Century Laws for Twenty-First-Century Wars’ (2016) 98(902) International Review of the Red Cross 419–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakimi, M., ‘Defensive Force against Non-State Actors: The State of Play’ (2015) 91 International Law Studies 1–31Google Scholar
Hathaway, O. et al., ‘Consent-Based Humanitarian Intervention: Giving Sovereignty Back to the Sovereign’ (2013) 46 Cornell International Law Journal 499–568Google Scholar
Heinze, E. A. and Neilsen, R., ‘Limited Force and the Return of Reprisals in the Law of Armed Conflict’ (2020) 34 Ethics and International Affairs 175–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helal, M. S., ‘The Myth of U.N. Collective Security’ (2018) 32 Emory International Law Review Recent Developments 1063–97Google Scholar
Hemmings, A. D., ‘Challenges to Substantive Demilitarisation in the Antarctic Treaty Area’ (2020) 12 Yearbook of Polar Law 172–94Google Scholar
Henderson, C., ‘The Bush Doctrine: From Theory to Practice’ (2004) 9 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henkin, L., ‘Kosovo and the Law of “Humanitarian Intervention”’ (1999) 93 American Journal of International Law 824–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, A., ‘Trump’s Missile Strike on Syria and the Legality of Using Force to Deter Chemical Warfare’ (2018) 23 Journal of Conflict & Security Law 33–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herik, L. van den andSchrijver, N., ‘Leiden Policy Recommendations on Counter-Terrorism and International Law’ (2010) 57 Netherlands International Law Review 531–50Google Scholar
Heyns, C. et al., ‘The International Law Framework Regulating the Use of Armed Drones’ (2016) 65 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 791–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, C., ‘Remarks by Charles Hill’ (under ‘The Bush Administration Preemption Doctrine and the Future of World Order’) (2004) 98 American Society of International Law Proceedings 329–31Google Scholar
Hillmann, H. and Gathmann, C., ‘Overseas Trade and the Decline of Privateering’ (2011) 71 Journal of Economic History 730–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hossain, K., ‘The Concept of jus cogens and the Obligation under the UN Charter’ (2005) 3 Santa Clara Journal of International Law 72–98Google Scholar
Huszti-Orbán, K. and Kalandarishvili-Mueller, N., ‘Is it a Bird? Is it a Plane? Is it an Armed Conflict? The Classification of the Situation in Syria’ (2012) 1 Journal of International Law, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2045696Google Scholar
Jacobson, M. R., ‘War in the Information Age: International Law, Self-Defense, and the Problem of “Non-Armed” Attacks’ (1998) 21(3) Journal of Strategic Studies 1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, R. Y., ‘The Caroline and MacLeod Cases’ (1938) 32 American Journal of International Law 82–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jimenez Kwast, P., ‘Maritime Law Enforcement and the Use of Force: Reflections on the Categorisation of Forcible Action at Sea in the Light of the Guyana/Suriname Award’ (2008) 13 Journal of Conflict & Security Law 49–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyner, D. H., ‘The Kosovo Intervention: Legal Analysis and a More Persuasive Paradigm’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law 597–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyner, D. H., ‘The Proliferation Security Initiative: Nonproliferation, Counterproliferation, and International Law’ (2005) 30 Yale Journal of International Law 507–48Google Scholar
Kamiński, M. A., ‘Operation “Olympic Games”: Cyber-Sabotage as a Tool of American Intelligence Aimed at Counteracting the Development of Iran’s Nuclear Programme’ (2020) 29 Security & Defence Quarterly 63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, N. J., ‘The Attack on Osirak: Delimitation of Self-Defence under International Law’ (1982) 4 New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law 131–56Google Scholar
Kleffner, J. K., ‘The Applicability of International Humanitarian Law to Organized Armed Groups’ (2011) 93(882) International Review of the Red Cross 443–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraska, J., ‘Broken Taillight at Sea: the Peacetime International Law of Visit, Board, Search and Seizure’ (2010) 16 Ocean and Coastal Law Journal 1–46Google Scholar
Krishnan, S., ‘The Alleged Use of Chemical Weapons against the Syrian People’ (2017) 21(2) World Affairs: The Journal of International Issues 22–33Google Scholar
Kunz, J., ‘Individual and Collective Self-Defence in Article 51 of the Charter of the UN’ (1947) 41 American Journal of International Law 872–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanovoy, V., ‘The Use of Force by Non-State Actors and the Limits of Attribution’ (2017) 28(2) European Journal of International Law 563–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laursen, A., ‘The Use of Force and (the State of) Necessity’ (2004) 37 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 485–526Google Scholar
Lehto, M., ‘The Fight against ISIL in Syria: Comments on the Recent Discussion of the Right of Self-Defence against Non-State Actors’ (2018) 87 Nordic Journal of International Law 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letendre, L. A., ‘Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems: Translating Geek Speech for Lawyers’ (2020) 96 International Law Studies 274–94Google Scholar
Lieblich, E., ‘Intervention and Consent: Consensual Forcible Interventions in Armed Conflicts as International Agreements’ (2011) 29 Boston University International Law Journal 337–82Google Scholar
Linderfalk, U., ‘The Effect of Jus Cogens Norms: Whoever Opened Pandora’s Box, Did You Think about the Consequences?’ (2007) 18 European Journal of International Law 853–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lissitzyn, O., ‘The Treatment of Aerial Intruders in Recent Practice and in International Law’ (1953) 47 American Journal of International Law 559–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, V., ‘The Iraqi Crisis: What Now?’ (2003) 52 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 859–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martens, F., ‘Étude historique sur la politique russe dans la question d’Orient’ (1877) 9 Revue de droit international et de législation comparée 49–77Google Scholar
Martin, C., ‘Challenging and Refining the “Unwilling and Unable” Doctrine’ (2019) 52 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 387–461Google Scholar
Marwah, O., ‘India’s Intervention in East Pakistan 1971–1972’ (1979) 13 Journal of Modern Asian Studies 549–80Google Scholar
McDougal, M. S., ‘The Soviet-Cuban Quarantine and Self-Defense’ (1963) 57 American Journal of International Law 597–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIlmail, T. P., ‘No-Fly Zones: The Imposition and Enforcement of Air Exclusion Regimes over Bosnia and Iraq’ (1994) 17 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 35–83Google Scholar
McKinnon, F., ‘Reprisals as a Method of Enforcing International Law’ (1991) 4 Leiden Journal of International Law 221–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeker, L. C., ‘Defensive Quarantine and the Law’ (1963) 57 American Journal of International Law 515–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelson, M. H., ‘The Formation of Customary International Law’ (1998) 272 Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law 155–410Google Scholar
Mobley, R., ‘Pueblo: A Retrospective’ (2001) 54 Naval War College Review 1–20Google Scholar
Myjer, P. J. and White, N. D., ‘The Twin Towers Attack: An Unlimited Right to Self-Defence?’ (2002) 7 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 5–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nydell, M. S., ‘Tensions between International Law and Strategic Security: Implications of Israel’s Preemptive Raid on Iraq’s Nuclear Reactor’ (1983–4) 24 Virginia Journal of International Law 459–92Google Scholar
O’Connell, M. E., ‘Dangerous Departures’ (2013) 107 American Journal of International Law 380–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connell, M. E., ‘The Popular but Unlawful Reprisal’ (2018) 44 Ohio Northern University Law Review 325–50Google Scholar
O’Donnell, T., ‘The Restitution of Holocaust Looted Art and Transitional Justice: The Perfect Storm or the Raft of the Medusa?’ (2011) 22 European Journal of International Law 49-80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paret, P., ‘Machiavelli, Fichte, and Clausewitz in the Labyrinth of German Idealism’ (2015) XVII(3) Ethics & Politics 78–95Google Scholar
Pedrozo, R., ‘Military Activities in the Exclusive Economic Zone: East Asia Focus’ (2014) 90 International Law Studies 514–43Google Scholar
Peters, A., ‘Intervention by Invitation: Impulses from the Max Planck Trialogues on the Law of Peace and War’ (2019) 79 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 635–41Google Scholar
Petras, C., ‘The Use of Force in Response to Cyber-Attack on Commercial Space Systems: Reexamining Self-Defense in Outer Space in Light of the Convergence of U.S. Military and Commercial Space Activities’ (2002) 67 Journal of Air Law and Commerce 1213–68Google Scholar
Pierson, C., ‘Preemptive Self-Defence in an Age of Weapons of Mass Destruction: Operation Iraqi Freedom’ (2004) 33 Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 150–78Google Scholar
Ranganathan, S., ‘Global Commons’ (2016) 27 European Journal of International Law 693–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisman, W. M., ‘Humanitarian Intervention and Fledgling Democracies’ (1994–5) 18 Fordham International Law Journal 794–805Google Scholar
Roberts, A., ‘The Equal Application of the Laws of War: A Principle under Pressure’ (2008) 90(872) International Review of the Red Cross 931–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, G., ‘The Uganda-Tanzania War, the Fall of Idi Amin, and the Failure of African Diplomacy, 1978–1979’ (2014) 8 Journal of East African Studies 692–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodley, N., ‘After Bangladesh: The Law of Humanitarian Intervention by Military Force’ (1973) 67 American Journal of International Law 275–305Google Scholar
Roscini, M., ‘Cyber Operations as Nuclear Counterproliferation Measures’ (2014) 19 Journal of Conflict & Security Law 133–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, R. L., ‘Iraq’s Chemical Weapons Legacy: What Others Might Learn from Saddam’ (2005) 59 Middle East Journal 187–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruys, T., ‘The Meaning of “Force” and the Boundaries of the jus ad bellum: Are “Minimal” Uses of Force Excluded from UN Charter Article 2(4)?’ (2014) 108 American Journal of International Law 159–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadurska, R., ‘Foreign Submarines in Swedish Waters: The Erosion of an International Norm’ (1984) 10 Yale Journal of International Law 34–58Google Scholar
Sadurska, R., ‘Threats of Force’ (1988) 82 American Journal of International Law 239–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapiro, M., ‘Iraq: The Shifting Sands of Preemptive Self-Defense’ (2003) 97 American Journal of International Law 599–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapiro, M., ‘Preempting Prevention: Lessons Learned’ (2005) 37 NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 357–71Google Scholar
Sassoli, M., ‘Autonomous Weapons and International Humanitarian Law: Advantages, Open Technical Questions and Legal Issues to Be Clarified’ (2014) 90 International Law Studies 308–40Google Scholar
Schachter, O., ‘The Lawful Resort to Unilateral Use of Force’ (1985) 10 Yale Journal of International Law 291–4Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. N., ‘Clipped Wings: Effective and Legal No-Fly Zone Rules of Engagement’ (1998) 72 International Law Studies 239–95Google Scholar
Schmitt, M.N., ‘Computer Network Attacks and the Use of Force in International Law: Thoughts on a Normative Framework’ (1998–9) 37 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 885–937Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. N., ‘Drone Attacks under the jus ad bellum and jus in bello: Clearing the “Fog of Law”’ (2011) 13 Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 311–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, M. N., ‘International Law and Military Operations in Space’ (2006) 10 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 89–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, M. N. and Ford, C. M., ‘Assessing U.S. Justifications for Using Force in Response to Syria’s Chemical Attacks: An International Law Perspective’ (2017) 9 Journal of National Security Law & Policy 283–303Google Scholar
Schwebel, S. M., ‘Aggression, Intervention and Self-Defence in Modern International Law’ (1972) 136 Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law 413–97Google Scholar
Shapira, A., ‘The Six-Day War and the Right of Self-Defence’ (1971) 6 Israel Law Review 65–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simma, B., ‘The Antarctic Treaty as a Treaty Providing for an Objective Regime’ (1986) 19 Cornell International Law Journal 189–209Google Scholar
Simma, B., ‘NATO, the UN and the Use of Force: Legal Aspects’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, A.-M., ‘The Use of Force in Iraq: Illegal and Illegitimate’ (2004) 98 American Society of International Law Proceedings 262–3Google Scholar
Soons, A. H. A., ‘Law Enforcement in the Ocean’ (2004) 3 WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs 3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroos, M. S., ‘The International Commons: A Historical Perspective’ (1988) 12 Environmental Review 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegel, H. W., ‘Origin and Development of Denial of Justice’ (1938) 32 American Journal of International Law 63–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenhoven, N. van der, ‘Conduct and Subsequent Practice by States in the Application of the Requirement to Report under UN Charter Article 51’ (2019) 6 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 242–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoker, D. and Whiteside, C., ‘Blurred Lines: Gray-Zone Conflict and Hybrid War – Two Failures of American Strategic Thinking’ (2020) 73(1) Naval War College Review 13–48Google Scholar
Taft, W. H., IV and Buchwald, T. F., ‘Preemption, Iraq, and International Law’ (2003) 97 American Journal of International Law 557–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thakur, R., ‘R2P after Libya and Syria: Engaging Emerging Powers’ (2013) 36(2) Washington Quarterly 61–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, A. W., ‘Doctrine of the Protection of Nationals Abroad: Rise of the Non-Combatant Evacuation Operation’ (2012) 11(3) Washington University Global Studies Law Review 627–68Google Scholar
Tladi, D., ‘An Assessment of Bethlehem’s Principles on the Use of Force against Non-State Actors’ (2013) 107 American Journal of International Law 572–5.Google Scholar
Tladi, D., ‘The Nonconsenting Innocent State: The Problem with Bethlehem’s Principle 12’ (2013) 107 American Journal of International Law 570–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsagourias, N., ‘Necessity and the Use of Force: A Special Regime’ (2010) Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 11–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urs, P., ‘Effective Territorial Control by Non-State Armed Groups and the Right of Self-Defence’ (2017) 77 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 31–4Google Scholar
Vidmar, J., ‘The Use of Force as a Plea of Necessity’ (2017) 111 American Journal of International Law Unbound 302–6Google Scholar
Vigni, P., ‘The Interaction between the Antarctic Treaty System and Other Relevant Conventions to the Antarctic Area’ (2000) 4 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 481–542Google Scholar
Waldock, C. H. M., ‘General Course in Public International Law’ (1962) 106 Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law 1–252Google Scholar
Waldock, C. H. M., ‘The Regulation of the Use of Force by Individual States in International Law’ (1952) 81 Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law 455–517Google Scholar
Wedgwood, R., ‘The Fall of Saddam Hussein: Security Council Mandates and Preemptive Self-Defence’ (2003) 97 American Journal of International Law 576–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilmshurst, E., ‘The Chatham House Principles of International Law on the Use of Force by States in Self-Defence’ (2006) 55 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 963–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfrum, R., ‘Restricting the Use of the Sea to Peaceful Purposes: Demilitarization in Being?’ (1981) 24 German Yearbook of International Law 200–41Google Scholar
Yoo, J., ‘International Law and the War in Iraq’ (2003) 97 American Journal of International Law 563–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility; Report of the High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change’, UN Doc. A/59/565 (2004)Google Scholar
Human Rights Council, ‘Report of the independent international commission of inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic’, UN Doc. A/HRC/21/50 (16 August 2012)Google Scholar
International Law Commission, Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, Annex to UN General Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 56/83 (12 December 2001), UN Doc. A/RES/56/83Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. (Chair ILC Study Group), ‘Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law’, UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.682 and Add.1 (2006)Google Scholar
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, ‘How Can Israel’s Blockade of Gaza Be Legal? UN Independent Experts on the “Palmer Report”’ (13 September 2011), https://tinyurl.com/3sf2xsrbGoogle Scholar
Benes, E. and Politis, N., ‘Report on the Protocol, Submitted to the Fifth Assembly’ (1924) 23 League of Nations Official Journal, Spec. Supp. 479–502Google Scholar
Campfens, E. (ed.), Fair and Just Solutions? Alternatives to Litigation in Nazi-Looted Art Disputes: Status Quo and New Developments (Eleven International, 2015)Google Scholar
Davids Commission, ‘Rapport Commissie van Onderzoek Besluitvorming Irak’ (January 2010), https://tinyurl.com/2p89dh2uGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Watch, ‘Death by Chemicals: The Syrian Government’s Widespread and Systematic Use of Chemical Weapons’ (1 May 2017), https://tinyurl.com/5ce6p7xsGoogle Scholar
Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia, Report, vol. II (September 2009)Google Scholar
Institut de Droit international/Institute of International Law, Session of Santiago – 2007, 10th Commission, Present Problems of the Use of Armed Force in International Law, Sub-group on self-defence, Resolution of 27 October 2007, www.idi-iil.org/app/uploads/2017/06/2007_san_02_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Institut de Droit international/Institute of International Law, Session of Wiesbaden – 1975), ‘Conditions of Application of Rules, other than Humanitarian Rules, of Armed Conflict to Hostilities in which United Nations Forces may be Engaged’, www.idi-iil.org/app/uploads/2017/06/1975_wies_02_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Institut de Droit International/Institute of International Law, Session of Wiesbaden – 1975), 8th Commission, The Principle of Non-Intervention in Civil Wars, Resolution of 14 August 1975, www.idi-iil.org/app/uploads/2017/06/1975_wies_03_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS), Report (2001)Google Scholar
Mills, C., ‘The Militarisation of Space’, Research Briefing, UK Parliament House of Commons Library (14 June 2021), https://tinyurl.com/3ar82rmzGoogle Scholar
UK Ministry of Defence, Joint Services Manual on the Law of Armed Conflict, Joint Service Publication 383 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Department of the Navy, Marine Corps and Coast Guard, The Commander’s Handbook of the Law of Naval Operations (NWP1-14 M, March 2022)Google Scholar
Walker, N., ‘Conflict in Ukraine: A Timeline (2014–present)’, UK House of Commons Library Research Briefing (24 February 2023), https://tinyurl.com/zhw7frcyGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, K. et al., ‘The Black Sea Blockade: Mapping the Impact of War in Ukraine on the World’s Food Supply – Interactive’, The Guardian (9 June 2022), https://tinyurl.com/mr44my8nGoogle Scholar
Aisch, G., Joseph, Y. and Singhvi, A., ‘Which Countries Support and Which Oppose the U.S. Missile Strikes in Syria’, New York Times (9 April 2017), https://tinyurl.com/yhf9kw5cGoogle Scholar
Al Jazeera, ‘Russia Says It Used Hypersonic Missiles in Ukraine Again’ (20 March 2022), https://tinyurl.com/n7puk5hwGoogle Scholar
Australian Broadcasting Corporation, ‘What’s the Big Deal about Hypersonic Weapons and Why Are Major Powers Vying for This Capability?’ (28 October 2021), https://tinyurl.com/3xs6ubfeGoogle Scholar
Barnard, A. and Gordon, M. R., ‘Worst Chemical Attack in Years in Syria; US Blames Assad’, New York Times (4 April 2017), https://tinyurl.com/5erwtaakGoogle Scholar
BBC News, ‘“Little Green Men” or “Russian Invaders”?’ (11 March 2014), www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26532154Google Scholar
BBC News, ‘Nuclear Weapons: Which Countries Have Them and How Many Are There?’ (14 January 2020), www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-51091897Google Scholar
BBC News, ‘Syria Air Strikes: US and Allies Attack “Chemical Weapons Sites”’ (14 April 2018), www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-43762251Google Scholar
BBC News, ‘Syria War: At Least 70 Killed in Suspected Chemical Attack in Douma’ (8 April 2018), www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-43686157Google Scholar
BBC News, ‘What is Russia’s Wagner Group of mercenaries in Ukraine’ (3 October 2022), www.bbc.com/news/world-60947877Google Scholar
Bloomberg News, ‘Transcript: Vladimir Putin’s Televised Address on Ukraine’ (24 February 2022), https://tinyurl.com/mw9rmz7nGoogle Scholar
Borger, J., ‘Israeli Airstrike Was Aimed at Syrian Reactor, Report Says’, The Guardian(15 October 2007), www.theguardian.com/world/2007/oct/15/syria.israelGoogle Scholar
CBS News, ‘President Biden Warns Vladimir Putin Not to Use Nuclear Weapons: “Don’t. Don’t. Don’t”’ (16 September 2022), https://tinyurl.com/yevbjft6Google Scholar
CNN News, ‘Syria Complains to U.N. about Israeli Airstrike’ (11 September 2007), https://edition.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/09/11/israel.syria/Google Scholar
CNN News, ‘US Combat Mission in Iraq Ends’ (31 August 2010).Google Scholar
Deutsche Welle, ‘Modern Spy Satellites in an Age of Space Wars’, https://tinyurl.com/m9jmd452Google Scholar
Economist, ‘A New Low for Global Democracy’ (9 February 2022), https://tinyurl.com/ysppzc4eGoogle Scholar
Goldenberg, S., Paton Walsh, N. and MacAskill, E., ‘Iraq Weapons Inspectors Find Empty Chemical Warheads’, The Guardian(17 January 2003), www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/jan/17/iraq.ewenmacaskillGoogle Scholar
Guardian, ‘Special Report Iraq, Iraq Timeline: July 16, 1979 to January 31, 2004’, www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/page/0,12438,793802,00.htmlGoogle Scholar
Guardian, ‘UN Weapons Inspectors Arrive in Iraq’ (18 November 2002), www.theguardian.com/world/2002/nov/18/iraqGoogle Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), ‘Syria: ICRC and Syrian Arab Red Crescent Maintain Effort Amid Increased Fighting’ (17 July 2012), https://tinyurl.com/y46p759aGoogle Scholar
Korean Central News Agency of the DPRK, ‘Israel Condemned for Intrusion into Syria’s Territorial Air’ (11 September 2007), in Federation of American Scientists, A Sourcebook on the Israeli Strike in Syria, 6 September 2007 (8 September 2018), https://fas.org/man/eprint/syria.pdfGoogle Scholar
MacAskill, E. and Burkeman, O., ‘Defiant Saddam Accepts UN Team’, The Guardian (14 November 2002), www.theguardian.com/world/2002/nov/14/iraq.ewenmacaskillGoogle Scholar
Mazzetti, M. and Cooper, H., ‘Israeli Nuclear Suspicions Linked to Raid in Syria’, New York Times (18 September 2007), www.nytimes.com/2007/09/18/world/asia/18korea.htmlGoogle Scholar
Reuters, ‘Chemical Weapons a Red Line in Syria, France’s Macron Says’ (29 May 2017), https://tinyurl.com/2p93ttv9Google Scholar
Silverleib, A., ‘U.S. Combat Mission in Iraq Ends’, CNN Politics (1 September 2010), https://tinyurl.com/yr9f8wh4Google Scholar
Simpson, J., ‘Russia’s Crimea Plan: Detailed, Secret and Successful’, BBC News (19 March 2014), www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26644082Google Scholar
Stone, M., ‘U.S. in Hypersonic Weapon “Arms Race” with China – Air Force Secretary’, Reuters (1 December 2021), https://tinyurl.com/yt39tsr2Google Scholar
Tidy, J., ‘Predatory Sparrow: Who Are the Hackers Who Say They Started a Fire in Iran?’, BBC News (11 July 2022), www.bbc.com/news/technology-62072480Google Scholar
Tiron, R., ‘Hypersonic Weapons: Who Has Them and Why It Matters’, Bloomberg (27 October 2021, updated 6 April 2022), https://tinyurl.com/3exbk924Google Scholar
Younge, G. and MacAskill, E., ‘UN Team Finds Iraq Has Illegal Missiles’ (13 February 2003), www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/feb/13/iraq.garyyoungeGoogle Scholar
Akande, D., ‘Does Use of Chemical Weapons Justify Intervention in Syria?’, EJIL:Talk! (27 April 2013), https://tinyurl.com/ex4sj4zeGoogle Scholar
Ambos, K., ‘Will a State Supplying Weapons to Ukraine Become a Party to the Conflict and Thus Be Exposed to Countermeasures?’, EJIL:Talk! (2 March 2022), https://tinyurl.com/4kne39ktGoogle Scholar
Azaria, D. and Ulfstein, G., ‘Are Sabotage of Submarine Pipelines an “Armed Attack” Triggering a Right to Self-Defence?’, EJIL:Talk! (18 October 2022), https://tinyurl.com/ym843n7fGoogle Scholar
Bilal, A., ‘Hybrid Warfare: New Threats, Complexity, and “Trust” as the Antidote’, NATO Review (30 November 2021), https://tinyurl.com/3c9eua3eGoogle Scholar
Callamard, A., ‘The Targeted Killing of General Soleimani: Its Lawfulness and Why It Matters’, Just Security (8 January 2020), https://tinyurl.com/3rw4wuj4Google Scholar
Chan, M., ‘What Is the Difference between a Hydrogen Bomb and an Atomic Bomb?’, Time (22 September 2017), https://time.com/4954082/hydrogen-bomb-atomic-bomb/Google Scholar
Cheatham, A., ‘A Look at Neutrality Now – and After the Ukraine War’, United States Institute of Peace (28 April 2022), https://tinyurl.com/mry6vxd9Google Scholar
Cohen, S., ‘Acid Rain Malware and Viasat Network Downtime in Ukraine: Assessing the Cyber War Threat’, Just Security (12 September 2022), https://tinyurl.com/y4tezv5zGoogle Scholar
Corten, O., ‘Contre une invocation abusive de la légitime défense pour faire face au défi du terrorisme’, RTBF (30 June 2016), https://tinyurl.com/47n3p9xbGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. K., ‘You Mean They Can Bomb Us? Addressing the Impact of Neutrality Law on Defense Cooperation’, Lawfare (2 November 2020), https://tinyurl.com/ycxynruxGoogle Scholar
Deeks, A., ‘Chemical Weapons in Syria: Enough to Justify the Use of Force?’, Lawfare (26 April 2013), https://tinyurl.com/yc38nztbGoogle Scholar
Deeks, A., ‘How Does the Syria Situation Stack Up to the “Factors” That Justified Intervention in Kosovo?’, Lawfare (7 April 2017), https://tinyurl.com/5pb9jbetGoogle Scholar
Deeks, A., ‘Syria, Chemical Weapons, and Possible U.S. Military Action’, Lawfare (10 December 2012), https://tinyurl.com/2d4jyzxwGoogle Scholar
Dunkelberg, A. G. et al., ‘Mapping States’ Reactions to the Syria Strikes of April 2018: A Comprehensive Guide’, Just Security (7 May 2018), https://tinyurl.com/bdupuujjGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, C., ‘Yes, the Attack on Syria Was Justifiable, and International Law Will Benefit from It’, Lawfare (7 April 2017), https://tinyurl.com/254cm7mboGoogle Scholar
Dupont, P.-E., ‘Countermeasures vs. Collective Security? The EU Sanctions against Iran’, EJIL:Talk! (22 June 2012), https://tinyurl.com/2p9wpr87Google Scholar
Galeotti, M., ‘How Migrants Got Weaponized’, Foreign Affairs (2 December 2021), https://tinyurl.com/3krnns2dGoogle Scholar
Goodman, R., ‘What Do Top Legal Experts Say about the Syria Strikes?’, Just Security, (7 April 2017), www.justsecurity.org/39712/top-legal-experts-syria-strikesGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, C., ‘Self-Defence’, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford Public International Law, 2011), https://tinyurl.com/2txyfx9jGoogle Scholar
Grieger, G., European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS), ‘China Tightens Its Grip over the South China Sea’ (24 February 2021), https://tinyurl.com/2p8p6664Google Scholar
Guyer, J., ‘Why Some Countries Don’t Want to Pick a Side in Russia’s War in Ukraine’, Vox (9 June 2022), https://tinyurl.com/76cvk7tjGoogle Scholar
Hajdin, N., ‘Complicity in a War of Aggression: Private Individuals’ Criminal Responsibility’, Just Security (1 April 2022), https://tinyurl.com/bdfj5bhwGoogle Scholar
Hakimi, M., ‘The Attack on Syria and the Contemporary jus ad bellum’, EJIL:Talk! (15 April 2018), https://tinyurl.com/y5n3sk3tGoogle Scholar
Harries, M., ‘Putin’s Brutal War Shows the Dilemmas of Nuclear Deterrence: Powerful Threats Could Too Easily Become Real Disasters’, Foreign Policy (22 March 2022), https://tinyurl.com/3tn2ferkGoogle Scholar
Hongju Koh, H., ‘Not Illegal: But Now the Hard Part Begins’, Just Security (7 April 2017), www.justsecurity.org/39695/illegal-hard-part-begins/Google Scholar
Jeannesson, S., ‘The Concert of Europe’, in Digital Encyclopedia of European History, https://tinyurl.com/4xwu2esmGoogle Scholar
Jebb, B. and Jones, L., ‘Little Blue Men in the South China Sea: Unmasking China’s Maritime Militia’ (podcast), Modern War Institute (5 June 2022), https://tinyurl.com/53h2sba6Google Scholar
Kuzio, T. and D’Anieri, P., ‘Annexation and Hybrid Warfare in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine’, E-International Relations (25 June 2018), https://tinyurl.com/mvvdsn4aGoogle Scholar
Merkouris, P., ‘Principle of Systemic Integration’, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford Public International Law, last updated August 2020), https://tinyurl.com/4f9d8uymGoogle Scholar
Milanovic, M., ‘The Clearly Illegal US Missile Strike in Syria’, EJIL:Talk! (7 April 2017), www.ejiltalk.org/the-clearly-illegal-us-missile-strike-in-syria/Google Scholar
Milanovic, M., ‘The Syria Strikes: Still Clearly Illegal’, EJIL:Talk! (15 April 2018), www.ejiltalk.org/the-syria-strikes-still-clearly-illegal/Google Scholar
Miracola, S., ‘Chinese Hybrid Warfare: Commentary’, Italian Institute for International Political Studies (ISPI) (21 December 2018), https://tinyurl.com/bdcprffuGoogle Scholar
Mortera Martinez, C. and Meyer, Z., ‘Using Sanctioned Russian Assets to Rebuild Ukraine Will Not Be Easy’, Centre for European Reform (3 August 2022), https://tinyurl.com/mwz5u7spGoogle Scholar
Nerlich, V., ‘The Crime of Aggression and Modes of Liability: Is There Room Only for Principals?’ (2017) 58 Harvard International Law Journal, https://tinyurl.com/h8hkf6ebGoogle Scholar
Palavenis, D., ‘The Use of Emerging Disruptive Technologies by the Russian Armed Forces in the Ukrainian War’, Air Land Sea Space Application (ALSSA) Center (1 October 2022), https://tinyurl.com/6hb5tmf5Google Scholar
Peters, A., ‘Passportisation: Risks for International Law and Stability’, EJIL:Talk! (9–10 May 2019), https://tinyurl.com/nm37cvh7 (Part I), https://tinyurl.com/2munkm84 (Part II)Google Scholar
Ponta, A., ‘Responsible State Behavior in Cyberspace: Two New Reports from Parallel UN Processes’ (2021) 25(14) ASIL Insights, www.asil.org/insights/volume/25/issue/14Google Scholar
Proelss, A., ‘Peaceful Purposes’, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford Public International Law, 2021), https://tinyurl.com/yck4cae4Google Scholar
Roguski, P., Application of International Law to Cyber Operations: A Comparative Analysis of States’ Views, The Hague Program for Cyber Norms Policy Brief (March 2020), https://tinyurl.com/3zxfs2wkGoogle Scholar
Schlochauer, H. J., ‘Bryan Treaties (1913–14)’, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford Public International Law, 1984), https://tinyurl.com/565kz4u5Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. N., ‘Lieber Institute White Paper: Responding to Malicious or Hostile Actions under International Law’, Lieber Institute Articles of War (26 April 2022), https://tinyurl.com/mt9jy9yyGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, M. N. and Ford, C. M., ‘The Use of Force in Response to Syrian Chemical Attacks: Emergence of a New Norm?’, Just Security (8 April 2017), https://tinyurl.com/54tr67f4Google Scholar
Shida, J., ‘China is Set to Wage Hybrid Warfare’ World Insight (21 December 2021, updated 6 December 2022), https://tinyurl.com/347f2zh7Google Scholar
Skinner, B., ‘Military Uses of Outer Space’ Space Security Index (November 2020), https://tinyurl.com/4xknef8tGoogle Scholar
Strydom, H. A., ‘Weapons of Mass Destruction’, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford Public International Law, 2017), https://tinyurl.com/2dzp59xbGoogle Scholar
Sullo, P. and Wyatt, J., ‘War Reparations’, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford Public International Law, 2015), https://tinyurl.com/36s4wyvaGoogle Scholar
Tams, C. J., ‘League of Nations’, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford Public International Law, 2006), https://tinyurl.com/m7cxd4s8Google Scholar
Tomuschat, C., ‘Uniting for Peace (2008)’, UN Audiovisual Library of International Law, https://legal.un.org/avl/ha/ufp/ufp.htmlGoogle Scholar
Trevithick, J., ‘U.S. Satellites Are Being Attacked Every Day According to Space Force General’, The Drive (30 November 2011), https://tinyurl.com/ye4psx33Google Scholar
Weitz, R., ‘Israel Airstrike in Syria: International Reactions’ (James Martin Center for Non-Proliferation Studies, 1 November 2007), https://tinyurl.com/k48buy63Google Scholar
Wright, D. and Tracy, C., ‘The Physics and Hype of Hypersonic Weapons’, Scientific American (1 August 2021), https://tinyurl.com/2yb85s67Google Scholar
Airforce Technology, ‘Harop Loitering Munitions UCAV System’ (2 July 2015), www.airforce-technology.com/projects/haroploiteringmuniti/Google Scholar
Army Technology, ‘Iron Dome Air Defence Missile System’ (14 May 2021), www.army-technology.com/projects/iron-dome/Google Scholar
Bureau of Investigative Journalism, ‘Drone Warfare’, www.thebureauinvestigates.com/projects/drone-warGoogle Scholar
DEWESoft, ‘Every Satellite Orbiting Earth and Who Owns Them’ (18 January 2022), https://tinyurl.com/4ftkc2skGoogle Scholar
European Centre for Countering Hybrid Threats, www.hybridcoe.fi/hybrid-threats/Google Scholar
European Council/Council of the EU, ‘EU Restrictive Measures against Belarus’, https://tinyurl.com/mshns6uwGoogle Scholar
European Council/Council of the EU, ‘EU Restrictive Measures against Russia over Ukraine (since 2014)’, https://tinyurl.com/58dnubdmGoogle Scholar
European Council/Council of the EU, ‘Iran: EU Restrictive Measures’, www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/sanctions/iran/Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross, ‘ICRC Position on Autonomous Weapon Systems’ (12 May 2021), https://tinyurl.com/y3y9n272Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross, ‘The Same IHL Applies to All Warring Parties: Differentiating between jus contra bellum (Law Prohibiting the Use of Force) and jus in bello (Law Limiting Effects of Warfare)’, How Does Law Protect in War?, https://tinyurl.com/mryhw258Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross, ‘San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea’, https://tinyurl.com/yc2yncsrGoogle Scholar
Raytheon, ‘Phalanx Weapon System’, https://tinyurl.com/y2hj5y96Google Scholar
Reliefweb, ‘Torture in Slow Motion: The Economic Blockade of Yemen and Its Grave Humanitarian Consequences’ (22 September 2022), https://tinyurl.com/3yhnrpmxGoogle Scholar
Strauss Center for International Security and Law Strait of Hormuz Project, ‘Tanker War’, www.strausscenter.org/strait-of-hormuz-tanker-war/Google Scholar
The Hague Program for Cyber Norms, ‘Annex to March 2020 Policy Brief on Application of International Law to Cyber Operations: Comparative Analysis of States’ Views’ (2020), https://tinyurl.com/yranh3stGoogle Scholar
UN Regional Information Centre for Western Europe, ‘The UN and the War in Ukraine: Key Information’ (9 March 2022, updated 8 June 2023), https://tinyurl.com/2hdnww7cGoogle Scholar
US National Archives and Records Administration, ‘World War II Looted Art: Turning History into Justice’, Google Arts & Culture, https://g.co/arts/AH5FQKTUrCQBqhSV9Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Terry D. Gill, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Kinga Tibori-Szabó, Universiteit van Amsterdam
  • Book: The Use of Force and the International Legal System
  • Online publication: 07 December 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009407342.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Terry D. Gill, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Kinga Tibori-Szabó, Universiteit van Amsterdam
  • Book: The Use of Force and the International Legal System
  • Online publication: 07 December 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009407342.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Terry D. Gill, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Kinga Tibori-Szabó, Universiteit van Amsterdam
  • Book: The Use of Force and the International Legal System
  • Online publication: 07 December 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009407342.017
Available formats
×