Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T02:29:47.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - The psychological dimension of water ecosystem services

from Part IV - Broadening the perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Victor Corral-Verdugo
Affiliation:
University of Sonora
Martha Frías-Armenta
Affiliation:
University of Sonora
Ceésar Tapia-Fonllem
Affiliation:
University of Sonora
Blanca Fraijo-Sing
Affiliation:
University of Sonora
Julia Martin-Ortega
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute, Scotland
Robert C. Ferrier
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute, Scotland
Iain J. Gordon
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute, Scotland
Shahbaz Khan
Affiliation:
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), France
Get access

Summary

18.1 INTRODUCTION

Discussions of ecosystem services and ecosystem services-based approaches have so far focused on their ecological, social, and economic aspects (Fisher et al. 2011). These are aspects of our common guiding core elements 2 and 3 as presented in Chapter 2 of this book. Core element 4 has also been dominated by economic and monetary quantification of benefits, including the environmental and socio-economic paybacks that result from the protection of water sources (Syme et al. 2008). The focus on these three aspects neglects to include psychological factors involved in water ecosystem services and their enjoyment by people. Also neglected is the study of the relationship between water ecosystem services and water conservation (i.e. individuals' actions aimed at avoiding water waste and contamination). Understanding the psychological components of the benefits of water ecosystem services is important because: (1) individuals value aspects of the environment that provide them with positive psychological consequences (i.e., satisfaction of needs, pleasure, wellbeing, etc.); and (2) if water ecosystem services are clearly perceived, people tend to conserve water in order to guarantee the continued provision of those services. These two components are psychological because they include mental (perceptions, values, emotions, psychological) benefits as well as behavioural (water conservation) aspects.

Although a number of psychologically positive consequences of the relationship between humans and water have been studied, ecosystem services-based approaches rarely incorporate the understanding of those consequences within their explanatory models and empirical studies. Therefore, little is known about people's perceived psychological benefits when (directly or indirectly) they come into contact with a water ecosystem. These psychologically positive consequences are fundamental to the appreciation of both water ecosystem services and water conservation efforts because pro-environmental behaviours are more likely to be maintained if those behaviours produce desirable outcomes in the form of positive mental states and psychological experiences (De Young 2000). Psychologically positive consequences also stimulate people's appreciation of water ecosystem services since some of these services include the experience of psychological restoration, happiness, and psychological wellbeing (which are aspects of core element 1 as defined in Chapter 2).

Type
Chapter
Information
Water Ecosystem Services
A Global Perspective
, pp. 156 - 162
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bechtel, R. B. & Corral-Verdugo, V. (2010). Happiness and sustainable behavior. In: Corral-Verdugo, V., García, C., & Frías, M. (eds), Psychological Approaches to Sustainability. Nova Science Publishers, New York.
Brady, E. (2006). Aesthetics in practice: valuing the natural world. Environmental Values 15, 277–291.Google Scholar
Brown, K. W. & Kasser, T. (2005). Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Social Indicators Research 74, 349–368.Google Scholar
Bustos, M. (2004). Modelo de conducta proambiental para el estudio de la conservación del agua potable. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Facultad de Psicología, UNAM.
Carrus, G., Bonnes, M., Corral, V., Moser, G., & Sinha, J. (2010). Social-psychological and contextual predictors of sustainable water consumption. In: Corral, V., García, C., & Frías, M. (eds), Psychological Approaches to Sustainability. Nova Science Publishers, New York.
Coelho, A., Adair, J., & Mocellin, J. (2004). Psychological responses to drought in northern Brazil. Interamerican Journal of Psychology 38, 95–103.Google Scholar
Corral-Verdugo, V. (2002). A structural model of pro-environmental competency. Environment & Behavior 34, 531–549.Google Scholar
Corral-Verdugo, V., Bechtel, R., & Fraijo, B. (2003). Environmental beliefs and water conservation: an empirical study. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23, 247–257.Google Scholar
Corral-Verdugo, V., Carrus, G., Bonnes, M., Moser, G., & Sinha, J. (2008). Environmental beliefs and endorsement of Sustainable Development principles in water conservation: towards a New Human Interdependence Paradigm scale. Environment & Behavior 40, 703–725.Google Scholar
Corral-Verdugo, V., Bonnes, M., Tapia, C., Fraijo, B., Frías, M., & Carrus, G. (2009). Correlates of pro-sustainability orientation: the affinity towards diversity. Journal of Environmental Psychology 29, 34–43.Google Scholar
Corral-Verdugo, V., Mireles, J., Tapia, C., & Fraijo, B. (2011a). Happiness as a correlate of sustainable behavior: a study of proecological, frugal, equitable and altruistic actions that promote subjective wellbeing. Human Ecology Review 18, 95–104.Google Scholar
Corral-Verdugo, V., Montiel, M., Sotomayor, M., Frías, M., Tapia, C., & Fraijo, B. (2011b). Psychological wellbeing as correlate of sustainable behaviors. International Journal of Hispanic psychology 4, 31–44.Google Scholar
Corral-Verdugo, V., Frías, M., Tapia, C., & Fraijo, B. (2012a). Protecting natural resources: psychological and contextual determinants of freshwater conservation. In: Clayton, S. (ed.), Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Corral-Verdugo, V., Tapia, C., García, F., Varela, C., Cuen, A., & Barrón, M. (2012b). Validation of a scale assessing psychological restoration associated with sustainable behaviours. Psyecology 3, 87–100.Google Scholar
DeFries, S., Pagiola, S., Adamowicz, W., et al. (2005). Analytical Approaches for Assessing Ecosystem Condition and Human Well-being. Vol. 1, Current State and Trends. Island Press, Washington, DC.
De Young, R. (2000). Expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues 56, 509–526.Google Scholar
Dickerson, C. Thibodeau, R., Aronson, E., & Miller, D. (1992). Using cognitive dissonance to encourage water conservation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22, 841–854.Google Scholar
Dunlap, R., Van Liere, K., Mertig, A., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425–442.Google Scholar
Dutton, D. (2003). Evolutionary aesthetics. In: Levinson, J. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.
Ennis-McMillan, M. (2001). Suffering from water: social origins of body distress in a Mexican community. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 15, 368–390.Google Scholar
Fisher, B., Bateman, I., & Turner, R. (2011). Valuing ecosystem services: benefits, values, space, and time. Ecosystem services economics (ESE) Working Paper Series, UNEP.
Fraijo, B., Corral-Verdugo, V., Tapia, C., & González, D. (2010). Promoting pro-environmental competency. In: Corral, V., García, C., & Frías, M. (eds), Psychological Approaches to Sustainability. Nova Science Publishers, New York.
Hartig, T., Kaiser, F., & Strumse, E. (2007). Psychological restoration in nature as a source of motivation for ecological behavior. Environmental Conservation 34, 291–299.Google Scholar
Hernández, B., Suárez, E., Corral, V., & Hess, S. (2012). The relationship between social and environmental interdependence as an explanation of proenvironmental behavior. Human Ecology Review 19, 1–9.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2000). Human nature and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues 56, 491–508.Google Scholar
Kelley, A. E. (2005). Neurochemical networks encoding emotion and motivation. In: Fellous, J. M. & Arbib, M. A. (eds), Who Needs Emotions. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Kessler, C. A. (2007). Motivating farmers for soil and water conservation: a promising strategy from the Bolivian mountain valleys. Land Use Policy 24, 118–128.Google Scholar
Lindenberg, S. & Steg, L. (2007). Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior. Journal of Social Issues 63, 117–137.Google Scholar
Maddux, J. (2009). Self-regulation. In: López, S. J. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Positive Psychology. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester.
Martinportugués, C., Canto, J., & Hombrados, M. I. (2007). Habilidades pro-ambientales en la separación y depósito de residuos sólidos urbanos. Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano 8, 71–92.Google Scholar
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Current State & Trends Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Offersmans, A., Haasnoot, M., & Valkering, P. (2011). A method to explore social response for sustainable water management strategies under changing conditions. Sustainable Development 19, 312–324.Google Scholar
Pelletier, L. C., Tuson, K. M., Green-Demers, I., & Noels, K. (1998). Why are we doing things for the environment? The motivation toward the environment scale (MTES). Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25, 437–468.Google Scholar
Perez-Castro, A. B. (2011). Actores sociales y su relación con el agua. Revista Líder 19, 133–144.Google Scholar
Pradhan, P. (2012). The role of water as a restorative component in small urban places. Unpublished Master's Thesis in Urban Landscape Dynamics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25, 54–67.Google Scholar
Ryff, C. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57, 1069–1081.Google Scholar
Spash, C. (2000). Ecosystems, contingent valuation, and ethics: the case of wetland recreation. Ecological Economics 34, 195–215.Google Scholar
Spash, C., Urama, K., Burton, R., Kenyon, W., Shanon, P., & Hill, G. (2009). Motives behind willingness to pay for improving biodiversity in a water ecosystem: economics, ethics and social psychology. Ecological Economics 68, 955–964.Google Scholar
Syme, G. & Nancarrow, B. (2008). Justice and the allocation of benefits from water. Social Alternatives 27, 21–25.Google Scholar
Syme, G., Porter, N., Goeft, U., & Kington, E. (2008). Integrating social well being into assessments of water policy: meeting the challenge for decision makers. Water Policy 10, 323–343.Google Scholar
Vanderbeeken, R. & Weber, E. (2002). Dispositional explanations of behavior. Behavior and Philosophy 30, 43–59.Google Scholar
Villacorta, M., Koestner, R., & Lekes, N. (2003). Further validation of the Motivation toward the Environment Scale. Environment & Behavior 35, 486–505.Google Scholar
Woolloff, D. (2009). O.K. We've got a problem, so who do we tell? Inter-agency communications – a water company view. In: Gray, J. & Thompson, C. (eds), Water Contamination Emergencies, Collective Responsibility. RSC Publishing, Cambridge.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×