Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T02:35:18.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Using ecosystem services-based approaches in Integrated Water Resources Management: perspectives from the developing world

from Part II - Applying frameworks for water management and biodiversity conservation under an ecosystem services-based approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Madiodio Niasse
Affiliation:
International Land Coalition, Secretariat at IFAD
Jan Cherlet
Affiliation:
International Land Coalition, Secretariat at IFAD
Julia Martin-Ortega
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute, Scotland
Robert C. Ferrier
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute, Scotland
Iain J. Gordon
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute, Scotland
Shahbaz Khan
Affiliation:
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), France
Get access

Summary

6.1 INTRODUCTION

Integrated Water Resources Management is a normative water management paradigm, widely applied at river basin and country level, which ‘promotes the co-ordinated development and management of water, land and related resources, in order to maximise the resultant economic and social welfare in an equitable manner without compromising the sustainability of vital ecosystems’ (Global Water Partnership 2000, p.22). In other words, the paradigm recognises, and tries to reconcile, the many competing uses of freshwater: water for human/domestic use, agriculture and industrial and energy production, and natural ecosystems. Although the water needs of natural ecosystems are amply recognised in Integrated Water Resources Management theory (Global Water Partnership 2000), in practice they are sacrificed in favour of productive water uses – especially in developing countries.

Every year more and more water is withdrawn from the hydrological cycle for productive purposes. As a result, the resource is increasingly commoditised and disputed. The competition for water is also more global than ever, which has led to frequent instances of land and water grabbing (Woodhouse 2012). In this context of international competition, the sidelining of natural ecosystems in water resources management is likely to be exacerbated. This will amplify the water crisis even further, given the central role of natural ecosystems in the provision, regulation, and recycling of water resources; according to the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, forest and mountain ecosystems are the sources of 85% of the world's total freshwater runoff (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005, p.167).

We argue that ecosystem services-based approaches can encourage Integrated Water Resources Management practice to pay adequate attention to the water needs of natural ecosystems, i.e. their water requirements for provisioning, regulating, supporting, and cultural services as well as the maintenance of the overall ecosystem health. Because natural ecosystems themselves are the major users of the world's freshwater resources, effective implementation of Integrated Water Resources Management is needed to sustain and enhance the services derived from these ecosystems.

Type
Chapter
Information
Water Ecosystem Services
A Global Perspective
, pp. 49 - 56
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acreman, M., Aldrick, J., Binnie, C. et al. (2009). Environmental flows from dams: the Water Framework Directive. Engineering Sustainability 162, 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
African Ministers' Council on Water (2012). 2012 Status Report on the Application of Integrated Approaches to Water Resources Management in Africa. AMCOW, Addis Ababa.
Arthington, A. H., Naiman, R. J., McClain, M. E., & Nilsson, C. (2010). Preserving the biodiversity and ecological services of rivers: new challenges and research opportunities. Freshwater Biology 55(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, E. B., Williams, W. H., & Kimmage, K. (1991). Economic Valuation of Wetlands Benefits: The Hadejia-Jama'are Floodplain, Nigeria. IIED, London. Available at: http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/8022IIED.pdf (last accessed 21 October 2014).
Barchiesi, S., Cartin, M., Wellling, R., & Yawson, D. (2011). Komadugu Yobe Basin, Upstream of Lake Chad, Nigeria. Case Study. IUCN/Water and Nature Initiative, Gland, Switzerland. Available at: https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/2011-097.pdf (last accessed 21 October 2014).
Bates, B., Kundzewicz, Z., Wu, S., & Palutikof, J. (eds) (2008). Climate Change and Water. IPCC Technical Paper VI. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Secretariat, Geneva. Available at: http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc11958 (last accessed 21 October 2014).
Biswas, A. K. (2008). Integrated water resources development: is it working? Water Resources Development 24(1), 5–22.Google Scholar
Cap-Net (2005). Integrated Water Resources Management Plans – Training Manual and Operational Guide. Cap-Net/Global Water Partnership/UNDP. Available at: www.cap-net.org/sites/cap-net.org/files/Manual_english.pdf (last accessed 21 October 2014).
Daily, G. C., Matson, P. A., & Vitousek, P. M. (1997). Ecosystem services supplied by soil. In Daily, G. C. (ed.), Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Dyson, M., Bergkamp, G., & Scanlon, L. (eds) (2003). Flow: The Essentials of Environmental Flows. IUCN/Water and Nature Initiative, Gland, Switzerland.CrossRef
Falkenmark, M. & Rockström, J. (2004). Balancing Water for Humans and Nature: The New Approach in Ecohydrology. Earthscan, London.
Ferraro, P. J. (2009). Regional review of payments for watershed services: sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28, 525–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ficatier, Y. & Niasse, M. (2008). Evaluation rétrospective – Volet social et environnemental du barrage de Manantali. Agence Française de Développement (AFD), Paris.
Foresight Project (2011). Maintaining Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services while Feeding the World: Foresight Project on the Global Food and Farming Futures. UK Government Office for Science, London.
Forslund, A. (2009). Securing Water for Ecosystems and Human Well-being: The Importance of Environmental Flows. Stockholm: Stockholm International Water Institute. Available at: www.unepdhi.org/~/media/Microsite_UNEPDHI/Publications/documents/unep_DHI/Environmental%20Flows%20Report%2024%20-low-res.ashx (last accessed 21 October 2014).
Global Water Partnership (2000). Integrated Water Resources Management. Stockholm: GWP. Available at: www.gwp.org/Global/GWP-CACENA_Files/en/pdf/tec04.pdf (last accessed 21 October 2014).
Hollis, G. E., Adams, W. M., & Aminu-Kano, M. (1993). The Hadejia-Nguru Wetlands. Environment, Economy and Sustainable Development of a Sahelian Floodplain Wetland. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
Ingram, J. C., Redford, K. H., & Watson, J. E. M. (2012). Applying ecosystem services approaches for biodiversity conservation: benefits and challenges. Sapiens 5(1), n.p.Google Scholar
Jones-Walters, L. & Mulder, I. (2009). Valuing nature: the economics of biodiversity. Journal for Nature Conservation 17, 245–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. M., Tharme, R. E., & Brown, C. A. (1999). Definition and Implementation of Instream Flows: Thematic Report for the World Commission on Dams. WCD, Cape Town.
Kumar, P., Brondizio, E., Gatzweiler, F., et al. (2013). The economics of ecosystem services: from local analysis to national policies. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5, 78–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Molden, D. (ed.) (2007). Water for Food, Water for Life. A Comprehensive Assessment of Water in Agriculture. International Water Management Institute (IWMI) and Earthscan, London.
Myers, J. P. & Reichert, J. S. (1997). Perspectives on nature's services. In Daily, G. C. (ed.), Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Niasse, M. & Lamizana, B. (2004). La prise en compte de l'environnement et du social dans les politiques de l'eau en Afrique de l'Ouest: fondements juridiques et leçons de l'expérience. In Niasse, M., Iza, A., Garane, A., et al. (eds), La Gouvernance de l'Eau en Afrique de l'Ouest : Aspects Juridiques et Institutionnels. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
Organisation pour la mise en valeur du fleuve Sénégal (1987). Etude de la gestion des ouvrages communs de l'OMVS. Rapport Phase 1. Vol 1B: Optimisation de la crue artificielle. Sir Alexander Gibb and Partners.
Organisation pour la mise en valeur du fleuve Sénégal (2002). Charte des eaux du fleuve Sénégal. Dakar: OMVS.
Richter, B. D. & Thomas, G. A. (2007). Restoring environmental flows by modifying dam operations. Ecology and Society 12(1). Available at: www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art12 (last accessed 21 October 2014).Google Scholar
Richter, B. D., Mathews, R., Harrison, D. L., & Wigington, R. (2003). Ecologically sustainable water management: managing river flows for ecological integrity. Ecological Applications 13(1), 206–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salem-Murdock, M., Niasse, M., Magistro, J., et al. (1994). Les barrages de la controverse. Le cas de la vallée du fleuve Sénégal. Paris: L'Harmattan.
Tharme, R. E. (2003). A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Research and Applications 19, 397–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, G. A. & DiFrancesco, K. (2009). Rapid Evaluation of the Potential for Re-optimizing Hydropower Systems in Africa: Final Report. Natural Heritage Institute, San Francisco, CA. Available at: www.n-h-i.org/uploads/tx_rtgfiles/REOPS_Final_Report_04-15-09.pdf (last accessed 21 October 2014).
UNEP (2012). Environment for the Future We Want: Global Environment Outlook 5. UNEP, Nairobi.
UNESCO (2009). Water in a Changing World: World Water Development Report 3. UNESCO/Earthscan, Paris.
UN-Water (2008). Status Report on IWRM and Water Efficiency Plans. Prepared for the 16th Session of the Commission on Sustainable Development. United Nations, New York.
World Commission on Dams (2000). Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-making. The Report of the World Commission on Dams. Earthscan, London.
Woodhouse, P. (2012). Foreign agricultural land acquisition and the visibility of water resource impacts in sub-Saharan Africa. Water Alternatives 5(2), 208–222.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×