Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:26:32.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Race

from PART I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Steven H. Shiffrin
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

The election of Barack Obama to the presidency was a milestone in American history that many of us thought we would never see. But, an end to racism it did not mark. The facts on the ground remain disturbing. Three times as many black children live in poverty as opposed to white children. Black unemployment rates are substantially higher than those of whites. Black men are more than six times as likely as white men to be imprisoned. Efforts to exclude blacks from the polls have been upheld by the Supreme Court on specious grounds. Facts such as these are not uniformly appreciated. Although racial attitudes have improved over time, any claim that we have moved to a post racial environment is exaggerated. Indeed, after reviewing substantial data and the evidence of racial polarization, David McAdam and Karina Kloos conclude: “Far from the imagined post-racial society Obama's election was supposed to herald, we find ourselves living through the period of greatest racial tensions and conflict since the 1960's and early 1970's.”

Nonetheless, publicly blatant racist speech has long been socially unacceptable. Unacceptable, as it may be, it is constitutionally protected. That protection has long been identified as a constitutional marker separating the United States from other civilized countries. Many Americans are proud that our Constitution protects not just “free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought that we hate.” On the other hand, some speech we hate can cause significant harm and does not deserve to be protected. The legal toleration of racist speech is incompatible with the nation's commitment to equal citizenship. It tolerates the denigration of vulnerable citizens on the basis of their skin color or ethnic background, factors that should be irrelevant to their relationship to the state or society. This toleration is inconsistent with the kind of public culture a just society needs to foster. To be sure, I can see the attraction of a free-wheeling society where anyone can say anything, of maintaining a tolerant posture, and some find attraction in the stereotypically masculine emotionless posture that irrational words cannot hurt me.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Race
  • Steven H. Shiffrin, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: What's Wrong with the First Amendment
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316676042.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Race
  • Steven H. Shiffrin, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: What's Wrong with the First Amendment
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316676042.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Race
  • Steven H. Shiffrin, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: What's Wrong with the First Amendment
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316676042.004
Available formats
×