Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:15:36.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Forest Bioeconomy Development

Markets and Industry Structures

from Part I - Wicked Problems and Policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2020

By
Lauri Hetemäki  and
Elias Hurmekoski
Edited by
William Nikolakis  and
John L. Innes
William Nikolakis
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver
John L. Innes
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Get access

Summary

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and its Sustainable development Goals (SDGs) and the Paris Agreement on climate change provide a license to change the existing global economic model. Production and consumption needs to be transformed to be sustainable so that we can live within our planetary boundaries. An essential part of this transformation will be a forest-based circular bioeconomy, which builds on the world’s biggest land-based natural capital – forests – and the synergies of the circular economy and bioeconomy concepts. Biology, science, technology, resource efficiency and sustainability are laying the foundations for this transformation. Within this context, forest bio-based products have emerged that can substitute fossil-based materials like plastics, chemicals, synthetic textiles, cement and many other materials. This chapter analyses this ongoing transformation, focusing on forest-based products, and examines what this role looks like by exploring trends in current market structures and forest products in this transformation, and asks how will these new emerging bioeconomy markets develop? Central to this chapter are other questions such as what role do polices play in the transformation, and how do the forest companies and institutions evolve in the coming decades? It is important to acknowledge that there are many ecosystem services related to forest bioeconomy that play an even greater role in sustaining life on earth – and therefore facilitating the bioeconomy - than the products we address in this chapter.

Keywords

Forest bioeconomyMarket outlookInstitutionsPoliciesBioproducts
Type
Chapter
Information
The Wicked Problem of Forest Policy
A Multidisciplinary Approach to Sustainability in Forest Landscapes
 , pp. 231 - 258
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antikainen, R., Dalhammar, C., Hildén, M., et al. 2017. Renewal of Forest Based Manufacturing towards a Sustainable Circular Bioeconomy. Reports of the Finnish Environment Institute 13, 2017.Google Scholar
BBI. 2013. Strategic Innovation and Research Agenda (SIRA), Bio-Based Industries Consortium. Available at: https://biconsortium.eu/about/our-vision-strategy/sira (accessed 30 June 2019).Google Scholar
Borregaard. 2018. Borregaard Annual Report 2017. Available at: www.borregaard.comGoogle Scholar
Cai, Z., Rudie, A. W., Stark, N. M., Sabo, R. C. and Ralph, S. A.. 2014. New products and product categories in the global forest sector. Pages 129–149 in Hansen, E., Panwar, R. and Vlosky, R., editors. The Global Forest Sector: Changes, Practices, and Prospects. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
EC (European Commission). 2015. Closing the Loop: An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy. European Commission, COM(2015) 614.Google Scholar
FAO. 2014. State of the World’s Forests: Enhancing the Socioeconomic Benefits from Forests. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
FAO. 2019. FAOSTAT database. Available at: www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FOGoogle Scholar
German Bioeconomy Council. 2018a. Bioeconomy Policy (Part III) Update Report of National Strategies around the World. Available at: http://gbs2018.com/fileadmin/gbs2018/Downloads/GBS_2018_Bioeconomy-Strategies-around-the_World_Part-III.pdfGoogle Scholar
German Bioeconomy Council. 2018b. Global Bioeconomy Summit Communiqué. Available at: http://gbs2018.com/fileadmin/gbs2018/Downloads/GBS_2018_Bioeconomy-Strategies-around-the_World_Part-III.pdfGoogle Scholar
Graichen, F. H., Grigsby, W. J., Hill, S. J., et al. 2017. Yes, we can make money out of lignin and other bio-based resources. Industrial Crops and Products 106:74–85.Google Scholar
Hetemäki, L., editor. 2014. Future of the European Forest-Based Sector: Structural Changes towards Bioeconomy. EFI What Science Can Tell Us, No. 6. Joensuu, Finland: European Forest Institute.Google Scholar
Hetemäki, L. and Hurmekoski, E.. 2016. Forest products markets under change: review and research implications. Current Forestry Reports. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-016-0042-z.Google Scholar
Hetemäki, L., Hänninen, R. and Moiseyev, A.. 2013. Markets and market forces for pulp and paper products. Pages 99–128 in Hansen, E., Panwar, R. and Vlosky, R., editors. The Global Forest Sector: Changes, Practices, and Prospects. USA: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
Hetemäki, L., Hanewinkel, M., Muys, B., et al. 2017. Leading the Way to a European Circular Bioeconomy Strategy. From Science to Policy 5. Joensuu, Finland: European Forest Institute.Google Scholar
Hurmekoski, E. 2016. Long-Term Outlook for Wood Construction in Europe. Dissertationes Forestales 211, Finnish Society of Forest Science.Google Scholar
Hurmekoski, E. and Hetemäki, L.. 2013. Studying the future of the forest sector: review and implications for long-term outlook studies. Forest Policy and Economics 34:17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurmekoski, E., Jonsson, R., Korhonen, J., et al. 2018. Diversification of the forest industries: role of new wood-based products. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 48(12):1417–1432. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2018-0116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonsson, R., Hurmekoski, E., Hetemäki, L. and Prestemon, J.. 2017. What is the current state of forest product markets and how will they develop in the future? Pages 99–128 in G. Winkel, editor. Towards a Sustainable European Forest-Based Bioeconomy – Assessment and the Way Forward. What Science Can Tell Us, No. 8. Joensuu, Finland: European Forest Institute.Google Scholar
Kallio, A. M. I., Chudy, R. and Solberg, B.. 2018. Prospects for producing liquid wood-based biofuels and impacts in the wood using sectors in Europe. Biomass and Bioenergy 108:415–425.Google Scholar
Kruus, K. and Hakala, T.. 2017. The Making of Bioeconomy Transformation. Espoo, Finland: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd.Google Scholar
Natural Resources Canada. 2017. The State of Canada’s Forests: Annual Report 2017. Available at: http://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/pubwarehouse/pdfs/38871.pdfGoogle Scholar
Näyhä, A., Hetemäki, L. and Stern, T.. 2014. New products outlook. Pages 15–32 in L. Hetemäki, editor. Future of the European Forest-Based Sector: Structural Changes towards Bioeconomy. EFI What Science Can Tell Us, Vol. 6. Joensuu, Finland: European Forest Institute.Google Scholar
PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2016. Global Forest, Paper and Packaging Industry Survey: 2016 Edition Survey of 2015 Results. Available at: www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/assets/pwc-annualfpp-industry-survey-2016-10.pdf (accessed 30 June 2019).Google Scholar
Trømborg, E., Bolkesjø, T. F. and Solberg, B.. 2013. Second-generation biofuels: impacts on bioheat production and forest products markets. International Journal of Energy Sector Management 7(3):383–402.Google Scholar
UN. 2015a. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nation General Assembly, A/RES/70/1.Google Scholar
UN. 2015b. Paris Agreement, United Nations.Google Scholar
UPM-Kymmene. 2001. Annual Report 2000, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
UPM-Kymmene. 2018. UPM Annual Report 2017, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
Wolfslehner, B., Linser, S., Pülzl, H., et al. 2016. Forest Bioeconomy – A New Scope for Sustainability Indicators. From Science to Policy, No. 4. Joensuu, Finland: European Forest Institute.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2019. Global Consumption Database. Available at: http://datatopics.worldbank.org/consumption/Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×