Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:02:53.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Edited by
Arif Ahmed
Arif Ahmed
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations
A Critical Guide
 , pp. 235 - 244
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, A. 2007. Saul Kripke. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Albritton, R. 1959. On Wittgenstein's use of the term ‘criterion’. Journal of Philosophy 56: 845–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, H. 2000. Kuhn's account of family resemblance: a solution to the problem of wide open texture. Erkenntnis 52: 313–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Augustine. 1961. Confessions. Translated by Pine-Coffin, R.. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Baker, G. 2004. Wittgenstein's Method: Neglected Aspects. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, G., and Hacker, P.. 1980. Wittgenstein: Understanding and Meaning. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Baker, G., and Hacker, P..1985. Wittgenstein: Rules, Grammar and Necessity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baker, G., and Hacker, P..2005a. An Analytical Commentary on Wittgenstein's ‘Philosophical Investigations’. (Revised edition of 1980.) Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Baker, G., and Hacker, P..2005b. Wittgenstein: Meaning and Understanding: Essays on the ‘Philosophical Investigations’. (Revised edition of 1980.) Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bambrough, R. 1961. Universals and family resemblances. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 61: 207–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellaimey, J. E. 1990. Family resemblance and the problem of the under-determination of extension. Philosophical Investigations 13: 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, G. 1967. Logical positivism, language, and the reconstruction of metaphysics. In The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method. Edited by Rorty, R.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992. First published in Rivista Critica di Storia della Filosophia 8 (1953): 453–81.Google Scholar
Bezuidenhout, A. 2002. Truth-conditional pragmatics. Philosophical Perspectives 16: 105–34.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. 2002. How Children Learn the Meaning of Words. 2nd edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bridges, J. Ms. Corralling context-sensitivity.
Campbell, J. 2002. Reference and Consciousness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. 1934. The Unity of Science. Edited and translated by M. Black. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
Carroll, L. 1988. Through the Looking-Glass. New York: Dial.Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. 1984. Critical study: Baker and Hacker's Wittgenstein. Synthese 58: 451–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavell, S. 1979. The Claim of Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Child, W. 2006. Memory, expression, and past-tense self-knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73: 54–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, W. 2010. Rule and exception in Wittgenstein's philosophy of mind. In Wittgenstein: Mind, Meaning, and Metaphilosophy. Edited by Frascolla, P., Marconi, D. and Voltolini, A.. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Coffa, J. A. 1994. The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Conant, J. 1989. Must we show what we cannot say? In The Senses of Stanley Cavell. Edited by Fleming, R. and Paine, M.. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
Conant, J. 2000. Elucidation and nonsense in Frege and early Wittgenstein. In The New Wittgenstein. Edited by Crary, A. and Read, R.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crary, A. 2000a. Introduction. In The New Wittgenstein. Edited by Crary, A. and Read, R.. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crary, A. 2000b. Wittgenstein's philosophy in relation to political thought. In The New Wittgenstein. Edited by Crary, A. and Read, R.. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crary, A., and Read, R. (eds.). 2000. The New Wittgenstein. London: Routledge.CrossRef
Davidson, D. 1963. Actions, reasons, and causes. Journal of Philosophy 60: 685–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, C. 1991. Throwing away the ladder: how to read the Tractatus. In The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press. First published in Philosophy 63 (1988): 5–27.Google Scholar
Diamond, C. 2000. Ethics, imagination and the method of Wittgenstein's Tractatus. In The New Wittgenstein. Edited by Crary, A. and Read, R.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Diamond, C. 2001. How long is the standard metre in Paris? In Wittgenstein in America. Edited by McCarthy, T. and Stidd, S.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dolev, Y. 2007. Mission impossible and Wittgenstein's standard metre. Philosophical Investigations 30: 127–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dummett, M. 1978a. The justification of deduction. In Truth and Other Enigmas. London: Duckworth. First published in Proceedings of the British Academy 59 (1975): 201–32.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. 1978b. Wittgenstein's philosophy of mathematics. In Truth and Other Enigmas. London: Duckworth. First published in Philosophical Review 68 (1959): 324–48.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. 1991a. Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. 1991b. More about thoughts. In Frege and Other Philosophers. Oxford: Clarendon Press. First published in Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 30 (1988): 1–19.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. 1991c. An unsuccessful dig. In Frege and Other Philosophers. Oxford: Clarendon Press. First published in Philosophical Quarterly 34 (1984): 379–401.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. 1993a. The Seas of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. 1993b. What is a theory of meaning? (I). In The Seas of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press. First published in Mind and Language. Edited by S. Guttenplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1974.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. 1993c. What is a theory of meaning? (II). In The Seas of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press. First published in Truth and Meaning. Edited by Evans, G. and McDowell, J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1976.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. 1993d. Wittgenstein on necessity: some reflections. In The Seas of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press. First published in Reading Putnam. Edited by Clark, P. and Hale, B.. Oxford: Blackwell 1991.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. 2007. Reply to Marco Santambrogio. In The Philosophy of Michael Dummett. Edited by Auxier, R. and Hahn, E.. La Salle and Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Evans, G. 1982. The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Floyd, J. 1998. The uncaptive eye: solipsism in the Tractatus. In Loneliness. Edited by Rouner, L.. Notre Dame: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Religion.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. 1998. Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. 2003. Hume Variations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. 2008. LOT 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogelin, R. 1976. Wittgenstein. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogelin, R. 1987. Wittgenstein. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Forster, M. 2004. Wittgenstein on the Arbitrariness of Grammar. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, A. 1982. Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Frege, G. 1979. Posthumous Writings. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Geach, P. T. 1957. Mental Acts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gert, H. 2002. The standard meter by any name is still a meter long. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65: 50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giaquinto, M. 2007. Visual Thinking in Mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginet, C. 1992. The dispositionalist solution to Wittgenstein's problem about understanding a rule. In The Wittgenstein Legacy. Edited by French, P., Uehling, T. and Wettstein, H.. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Glock, H.-J. 1990. Philosophical Investigations: principles of interpretation. In Wittgenstein – Towards a Re-evaluation. Edited by Haller, R. and Brandl, J.. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar
Glock, H.-J. 1996. A Wittgenstein Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glock, H.-J. 1997. Philosophy, thought and language. In Thought and Language. Edited by Preston, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Glock, H.-J. 2001. The development of Wittgenstein's philosophy. In Wittgenstein: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Glock, H.-J. 2003. Quine and Davidson on Language, Thought and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glock, H.-J. 2006. Concepts: representations or abilities? In Content, Consciousness, and Perception. Edited by Di Nucci, E. and McHugh, C.. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Glock, H.-J. 2008. What is Analytic Philosophy?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glock, H.-J. 2009. Concepts: where subjectivism goes wrong. Philosophy 84: 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfarb, W. 1983. I want you to bring me a slab: remarks on the opening sections of the Philosophical Investigations. Synthese 56: 265–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfarb, W. 1992. Wittgenstein on understanding. In The Wittgenstein Legacy. Edited by French, P., Uehling, T. and Wettstein, H.. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Goldfarb, W. 1997. Metaphysics and nonsense. Journal of Philosophical Research 22: 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P., and Strawson, P. F.. 1956. In defense of a dogma. Philosophical Review 65: 141–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, P. 1986. Insight and Illusion. 2nd edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. 1987. Languages, minds and brains. In Mindwaves. Edited by Blakemore, C. and Greenfield, S.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. 1993a. Wittgenstein: Meaning and Mind. Part I – Essays. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. 1993b. Wittgenstein: Meaning and Mind. Part II – Exegesis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. 1996a: Wittgenstein: Mind and Will. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. 1996b. Wittgenstein's Place in Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. 2000a. Wittgenstein: Mind and Will. Part I – Essays. (Slightly revised edition of 1996a.) Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. 2000b. Wittgenstein: Mind and Will. Part II – Exegesis. (Slightly revised edition of 1996a.) Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haller, R. 1988. Questions on Wittgenstein. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Hallett, G. 1977. A Companion to Wittgenstein's ‘Philosophical Investigations’. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hanna, R. 1993. Direct reference, direct perception, and the cognitive theory of demonstratives. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 74: 96–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, R. 2006a. Rationality and the ethics of logic. Journal of Philosophy 103: 67–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, R. 2006b. Rationality and Logic. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1972. The Language of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hilmy, S. 1987. The Later Wittgenstein: The Emergence of a New Philosophical Method. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. 1996. Ludwig Wittgenstein: Half-Truths and One-and-a-Half Truths. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintikka, J. and Hintikka, M.. 1986. Investigating Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hobson, P. 2002. The Cradle of Thought. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Horwich, P. 2004. Wittgenstein's metaphilosophical development. In Wittgenstein's Lasting Significance. Edited by Kolbel, M. and Weiss, B.. London: Routledge. Reprinted in his From a Deflationary Point of View. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2004.Google Scholar
Horwich, P. Forthcoming 1. The nature of paradox. In Truth–Meaning–Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Horwich, P. Forthcoming 2. Williamson's philosophy of philosophy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Horwich, P. Forthcoming 3. Wittgenstein's Metaphilosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hylton, P. 1997. Functions, operations, and sense in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. In Early Analytic Philosophy. Edited by Tait, W.. La Salle, IL: Open Court Press.Google Scholar
Jacquette, D. 1998. Wittgenstein's Thought in Transition. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
James, W. [1890] 1983. The Principles of Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. 1989. Demonstratives. Themes from Kaplan. Edited by Almog, J.et al. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kenny, A. 1975. Will, Freedom and Power. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kenny, A. 1984. The Legacy of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kenny, A. 1989. The Metaphysics of Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kenny, A. 2006. Wittgenstein. Revised 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kienzler, W. 1997. Wittgensteins Wende zu seiner Spätphilosophie 1930–1932. Eine historische und systematische Darstellung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Kienzler, W. 2001. About the dividing line between early and late Wittgenstein. In From the Tractatus to the Investigations and Other Essays. Edited by Oliveri, G.. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. 1980. Naming and Necessity. 2nd edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. 1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Künne, W. 2005. Properties in abundance. In Universals, Concepts and Qualities. Edited by Chakrabarti, A. and Strawson, P. F.. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Leiter, B. 2004. Introduction. In The Future for Philosophy. Edited by Leiter, B.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Locke, J. [1689] 1975. Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Luntley, M. 2008a. Conceptual development and the paradox of learning. Journal of Philosophy of Education 42: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luntley, M. 2008b. Training and learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory 40: 695–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luntley, M. 2009. On the teaching and learning of words. In Wittgenstein's Enduring Arguments. Edited by Levy, D. and Zamuner, E.. London and Boston: Routledge.Google Scholar
Malcolm, N. 1995. Kripke and the standard meter. In Wittgensteinian Themes: Essays 1978–1989. Edited by Wright, G. H.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Maury, A. 1994. Sources of the remarks in Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations. Synthese 98: 349–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. 1984. Wittgenstein on following a rule. Synthese 58: 325–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. 1994. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1998a. Intentionality and interiority in Wittgenstein. In Mind, Value and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1998b. One strand in the private language argument. In Mind, Value and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McGinn, M. 1997. Wittgenstein and the ‘Philosophical Investigations’. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McGuinness, B. F. 2002. Approaches to Wittgenstein. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medina, J. 2002. The Unity of Wittgenstein's Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Minar, E. 1995. Feeling at home in language. Synthese 102: 413–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minar, E. 1998. Wittgenstein on the metaphysics of the self: the dialectic of solipsism in Philosophical Investigations. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79: 329–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulhall, S. 2007. Wittgenstein's Private Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Peacocke, C. 1984. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language by Saul A. Kripke. Philosophical Review 93: 263–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacocke, C. 1992. A Study of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pears, D. 1986. Ludwig Wittgenstein. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 2nd edition with a new preface by the author.Google Scholar
Pears, D. 1987. The False Prison vol. I. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pears, D. 1988. The False Prison vol. II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pears, D. 2006. Paradox and Platitude in Wittgenstein's Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, J. 1979. The problem of the essential indexical. Noûs 13: 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. 2004. Existentialism, quietism, and the role of philosophy. In The Future for Philosophy. Edited by Leiter, Brian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pichler, A. 1994. Untersuchungen zu Wittgensteins Nachlass (Investigating Wittgenstein's Nachlass). Working Papers from the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen 8. http://wab.aksis.uib.no/wp-no8.pdf 2.4 on revision of TS 208 in MSS 111–114.
Pichler, A. 2004. Wittgensteins Philosophische Untersuchungen: Vom Buch zum Album (Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations: From Book to Album). Studien zur Österreichischen Philosophie 36. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Pollock, G. 2004. Wittgenstein on the standard metre. Philosophical Investigations 27: 148–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pompa, L. 1967. Family resemblance. Philosophical Quarterly 17: 63–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pompa, L. 1968. Family resemblance: a reply. Philosophical Quarterly 18: 347–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, H. H. 1953. Thinking and Experience. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. 1966. Critical notice of the Tractatus. In Essays on Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Edited by Beard, R. and Copi, I.. London: Routledge. First published in Mind 32 (1923): 465–78.Google Scholar
Recanati, F. 2005. Literalism and contextualism: some varieties. In Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth. Edited by Preyer, G. and Peter, G.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ricketts, T. 1996. Pictures, logic, and the limits of sense in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. In The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein. Edited by Sluga, H. and Stern, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. and Mervis, C.. 1975. Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7: 573–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothaupt, J. 1996. Farbthemen in Wittgensteins Gesamtnachlass. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1912. The Problems of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1966. On the nature of truth and falsehood. [1910]. Reprinted in Philosophical Essays. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1985. The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. [1918]. Reprint, edited by Pears, D.. Chicago: Open Court Publishing.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1988. Logical atomism. [1924]. Reprinted in vol. IX of Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell. Edited by Frohmann, B. and Slater, J.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. 1949. The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson and Co.Google Scholar
Schulte, J. 1992. Wittgenstein: An Introduction. Translated by Brenner, W. and Holley, J.. Albany: State University of New York Press. First published in 1989 as Wittgenstein: Eine Einführung. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Schulte, J. 1998. Review of Wolfgang Kienzler, Wittgensteins Wende zu seiner Spätphilosophie 1930–1932. European Journal of Philosophy 6: 379–85.Google Scholar
Schulte, J. 2002. Wittgenstein's method. In Wittgenstein and the Future of Philosophy: A Reassessment after 50 Years. Edited by Haller, R. and Puhl, Klaus. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar
Schulte, J. 2005. What is a work by Wittgenstein? In Wittgenstein: The Philosopher and His Works. Edited by Pichler, A., and Säätelä, S.. Frankfurt am Main: Ontos Verlag.Google Scholar
Schulte, J. Forthcoming. Concepts and concept-formation. In Wittgenstein after His Nachlass. Edited by Venturinha, N.. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sellars, W. 1962. Philosophy and the scientific image of man. In Frontiers of Science and Philosophy. Edited by Colodny, R.. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, M. A. 1969. When is a resemblance a family resemblance?Mind 78: 408–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluga, H. 1983. Subjectivity in the Tractatus. Synthese 56: 123–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluga, H. 1996. Whose house is that? Wittgenstein on the self. In The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein. Edited by Sluga, H. and Stern, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E. and Medin, D.. 1981. Concepts and Categories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soames, S. 2003. Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century. Vol. II. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, D. 1991. The ‘middle Wittgenstein’. Synthese 87: 203–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, D. 1995. Wittgenstein on Mind and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, D. 1996. The availability of Wittgenstein's philosophy. In The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein. Edited by Sluga, H. and Stern, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, D. 2004. Wittgenstein's ‘Philosophical Investigations’: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, D. 2005. How many Wittgensteins? In Wittgenstein: The Philosopher and His Works. Edited by Pichler, A. and Säätelä, S.. Frankfurt am Main: Ontos Verlag.Google Scholar
Stern, D. 2007. The uses of Wittgenstein's beetle: Philosophical Investigations 293 and its interpreters. In Wittgenstein and His Interpreters. Edited by Kahane, G., Kanterian, E. and Kuusela, O.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stern, D. Forthcoming 1. Private language. In The Oxford Wittgenstein Handbook. Edited by McGinn, Marie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stern, D. Forthcoming 2. Tracing the development of Wittgenstein's writing on private language. In Wittgenstein after His Nachlass. Edited by Venturinha, N.. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Strawson, P. 1959. Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, B. 2000a. Mind, meaning, and practice. In Meaning, Understanding, and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stroud, B. 2000b. Reasonable claims: Cavell and the tradition. In Understanding Human Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stroud, B. 2000c. Wittgenstein on meaning, understanding, and community. In Meaning, Understanding, and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, P. M. 1994. Problems for a construction of meaning and intention. Mind 103: 147–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travis, C. 1989. The Uses of Sense: Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Travis, C. 2006: Thought's Footing: A Theme in Wittgenstein's ‘Philosophical Investigations’. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tugendhat, E. 1982. Traditional and Analytic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Savigny, E. 1994. Wittgenstein's ‘Philosophische Untersuchungen’: Ein Kommentar für Leser (Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations: A Commentary for Readers). 2nd edition. 2 vols. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Wright, G. H., 1982. Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weitz, M. 1956. The role of theory in aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 15: 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. 1999. Wittgenstein, Mind and Meaning. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, T. 2004. Past the linguistic turn. In The Future for Philosophy. Edited by Leiter, B.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 2008. Must do better. In The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wisdom, J. 1952. Ludwig Wittgenstein, 1934–1937. Mind 61: 258–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witherspoon, E. 2000. Conceptions of nonsense in Carnap and Wittgenstein. In The New Wittgenstein. Edited by Crary, A. and Read, R.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wright, C. 2001a. On making up one's mind: Wittgenstein on intention. In Rails to Infinity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. First published in Logic, Philosophy of Science and Epistemology. Edited by P. Weingartner and G. Schurz. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky 1987.Google Scholar
Wright, C. 2001b. Wittgenstein's later philosophy of mind: sensation, privacy and intention. In Rails to Infinity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. First published in Meaning Scepticism, ed. Klaus Puhl. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter and Co.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Arif Ahmed, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Wittgenstein's <I>Philosophical Investigations</I>
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750939.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Arif Ahmed, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Wittgenstein's <I>Philosophical Investigations</I>
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750939.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Arif Ahmed, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Wittgenstein's <I>Philosophical Investigations</I>
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750939.014
Available formats
×