Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
- INTRODUCTION TO THIS VOLUME
- PART I “LECTURES ON ARCHITECTURE AND PAINTING” (1854)
- PART II REVIEWS, LETTERS, AND PAMPHLETS ON ART (1844–1854)
- APPENDIX TO PART II
- I LETTERS ON PAINTED GLASS (1844)
- II NOTES ON THE LOUVRE (1844, 1849, 1854)
- III ADDRESSES ON COLOUR AND ILLUMINATION (1854)
- PART III “NOTES ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF SHEEPFOLDS” (1851)
- APPENDIX TO PART III
- PART IV LETTERS ON POLITICS (1852)
- Plate section
I - LETTERS ON PAINTED GLASS (1844)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2011
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
- INTRODUCTION TO THIS VOLUME
- PART I “LECTURES ON ARCHITECTURE AND PAINTING” (1854)
- PART II REVIEWS, LETTERS, AND PAMPHLETS ON ART (1844–1854)
- APPENDIX TO PART II
- I LETTERS ON PAINTED GLASS (1844)
- II NOTES ON THE LOUVRE (1844, 1849, 1854)
- III ADDRESSES ON COLOUR AND ILLUMINATION (1854)
- PART III “NOTES ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF SHEEPFOLDS” (1851)
- APPENDIX TO PART III
- PART IV LETTERS ON POLITICS (1852)
- Plate section
Summary
Rouen, 18th May.
My dear Oldfield,—As we always travel slowly, in order not to fatigue my mother, and went round by Dieppe, we arrived here only this forenoon. I found no glass at Abbeville—at Eu, the pet church of Louis Philippe has some modern glass, of the worst kind; as bad as Ward's in design, and worse in colour, but in the private chapel there were some good heads after Perugino. No glass at Dieppe. But when I got into the Cathedral here this evening, I was grievously vexed with all that I had done, and rendered almost hopeless by the dazzling beauty of form of the windows of the choir, and, to make the matter worse, I came upon some bits of restoration, which, though apparently adhering in all points to the original design, had utterly lost its effect, so that I find we are entirely in Ward's power, and however good the design we give him may be, he can altogether spoil it in execution. I set myself to consider the difference between the ancient and modern work, which I find chiefly to consist in these points (the design, size, etc., being in all points the same).
First, the modern glass admits much more light, producing a glaring and painful impression on the eye, so that I could not look at it long—the old glass soothed, attracted, and comforted the eye, not dazzling it, but admitting of long contemplation without the least pain.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Works of John Ruskin , pp. 435 - 447Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010First published in: 1903