Article contents
U.S. Enacts Law on Normalizing Trade Relations with China
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 March 2017
Abstract
- Type
- Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2001
References
1 See Murphy, Sean D., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 94 AJIL 373 (2000)Google ScholarPubMed.
2 Message to the Congress on Permanent Normal Trade Relations Status for China, 36 Weekly Comp. Pres. Doc. 493, 493-94 (Mar. 13, 2000).
3 H.R. Rep. No. 106-632, at 14 (2000).
4 Id.
5 Id at 35-36 (2000).
6 126 Cong. Rec H3746-47 (daily ed. May 24, 2000).
7 For various amendments, see 126 Cong. Rec. S8216-22 (daily ed. Sept. 7, 2000).
8 126 Cong. Rec. S8725-26 (daily ed. Sept. 19, 2000).
9 Normal Trade Relations for the People’s Republic of China Act, Pub. L. No. 106-286, 114 Stat. 880 (2000).
10 Id. §§101-102.
11 See John Pomfret, China’s Entry into WTO Unlikely This Year, Wash. Post, Oct. 28, 2000, at El.
12 Pub. L. No. 106-286, supra note 9, §421.
13 Id. §103.
14 Id. §§301-309.
15 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Dec. 16, 1966, 999 UNTS 171.
16 GA Res. 217A (III) (Dec. 10, 1948).
17 Pub. L. No. 106-286, supra note 9, §§501-505.
18 Id. §§511-514.
19 Id. §601.
20 Remarks on Signing Legislation on Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China, 36 Weekly Comp. Pres. Doc. 2417 (Oct. 16, 2000); see Kahn, Joseph & Sangor, David E., Clinton Warns China to Abide by Trade Rules, N.Y. Times, Oct. 11, 2000, at Al Google Scholar.
- 1
- Cited by