Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:11:28.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Enrichment Value of Wooden Blocks for Farmed Blue Foxes (Alopex Lagopus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

H Korhonen  and
P Niemelä
H Korhonen*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Centre of Finland, Fur Farming Research Station, FIN-69100 Kannus, Finland
P Niemelä
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Centre of Finland, Fur Farming Research Station, FIN-69100 Kannus, Finland
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The barren housing conditions of farmed blue foxes (Alopex lagopus) provide few stimuli to motivate exploration and interaction with the physical environment. In the present study, wooden blocks (30x7 cm [lxdia]) were employed to clarify how such inanimate objects might serve to enrich the barren wire-mesh cages. Two separate experiments were carried out. In experiment 1, behavioural reactions of eight male blue foxes to wooden blocks were videotaped between January and May. In experiment 2, 16 male blue foxes were housed singly in cages with wooden blocks and 16 without between January and June. Pencil, confrontation, feeding and open field tests were carried out. Furthermore, 50 female blue foxes were kept singly in cages with wooden blocks and 49 without from January to July. Both groups were bred and the whelping result was recorded. In-cage behavioural tests were performed three times. Results showed that interactions with the wooden blocks were frequent, averaging 77 interactions fox’1 day1. Interactions with blocks decreased slightly with time. Blocks were mainly used for carrying, chewing, poking and sniffing. In the confrontation test, male foxes housed without blocks were more passive than those with blocks. No differences were found between the groups in the pencil, feeding or open field tests. Whelping success tended to be better for vixens housed with than without blocks. It can be concluded that wooden blocks have enrichment value by providing more choices for foxes in a barren cage and stimulating more variable behaviour.

Keywords

animal welfarebehaviourenrichmentfarm foxinanimate object
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , May 2000 , pp. 177 - 191
Copyright
© 2000 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Ables, E D 1969 Activity studies of red foxes in southern Wisconsin. Journal of Wildlife Management 33: 145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcock, J 1975 Animal Behaviour pp 234–263. Sinauer Associates Inc: Sunderland, USAGoogle Scholar
Apple, J K and Craig, J V 1992 The influence of pen size on toy preference of growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 35: 301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnone, M and Dantzer, R 1980 Does frustration induce stress in pigs? Applied Animal Ethology 6: 351–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakken, M 1994 Infanticidal Behaviour and Reproductive Performance in Relation to Competition Capacity among Farmed Silver Fox Vixens, Vulpes vulpes. PhD thesis, University of Trondheim, NorwayGoogle Scholar
Bakken, M, Braastad, B, Harri, M, Jeppesen, L L and Pedersen, V 1994 Production conditions, behaviour and welfare of farm foxes. Scientifur 18: 233–248Google Scholar
Belyaev, D K, Plyusnina, I Z and Trut, L N 1985 Domestication in the silver fox (Vulpes fulvus Desm): changes in physiological boundaries of the sensitive period of primary socialization. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 13: 359–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, H 1986 Rehutietoutta Turkiseläinkasvattajille. Turkiseläintutkimuksia 23. Suomen Turkiseläinten Kasvattajain Liitto ry: Vaasa, FinlandGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe 1991 Standing Committee of the European Convention for the Protection of Animals Kept for Farming Purposes: Recommendation concerning fur animals. Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 25 June 1991. ETS 87. Council of Europe: Strasbourg, FranceGoogle Scholar
Fay, F H and Stephenson, R O 1989 Annual, seasonal, and habitat-related variation in feeding habits of the Arctic fox (Alopex lagopus) on St. Lawrence Island, Bering Sea. Canadian Journal of Zoology 67: 1986–1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, M W 1970 A comparative study of the development of facial expressions in canids; wolf, coyote and foxes. Behaviour 36: 49–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, A F and Broom, D M 1997 Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare, 3rd edition. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Gonyou, H W 1986 Assessment of comfort and well-being in farm animals. Journal of Animal Science 62: 1769–1775CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grandin, T, Curtis, S E and Taylor, I A 1987 Toys, mingling and driving reduce excitability in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 65 (Suppl 1): 230Google Scholar
Harri, M, Mononen, J, Korhonen, H and Haapanen, K 1991 A study of the use of resting platforms by farmbred blue foxes. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 30: 125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, J D 1977 The use of urine marking in the scavenging behaviour of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Behaviour 61: 82–105CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeppesen, L L and Falkenberg, H 1990 Effects of play balls on peltbiting, behaviour and level of stress in ranch mink. Scientifur 14: 179–186Google Scholar
Kaliste-Korhonen, E, Eskola, S, Rekilä, T, Mononen, J and Nevalainen, T 1994 Wooden blocks as enrichmental tools for rats. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology p 79. Ministry of Agriculture, National Institute of Animal Science: Foulum, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
Kilgour, R and Dalton, C 1983 Livestock Behaviour pp 1-6, 150-190, 281-292. Methuen: Auckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Korhonen, H, Alasuutari, S, Mäkinen, A and Niemelä, P 1997 Inter- and intraspecific competition between the fox species Alopex lagopus and Vulpes vulpes: an evaluation trial under penned conditions. Polar Biology 17: 330–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korhonen, H, Ketoja, E and Niemelä, P 1995 Comparison of daytime use between platform types, materials, ceilings and experiences in juvenile blue foxes (Alopex lagopus). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 45: 125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korhonen, H and Niemelä, P 1993 Talvi-ja lisääntymiskauden hyllykoe siniketuilla. Tammi-heinäkuu 1993. Turkistalous 65: 210–218Google Scholar
Korhonen, H and Niemelä, P 1996 Temperament and reproductive success in farmbred silver foxes housed with and without platforms. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 113: 209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korhonen, H and Niemelä, P 1998 Seasonal and circadian changes in activity rates of adult farm blue foxes. Agricultural and Food Science in Finland 7: 21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korhonen, H, Niemelä, P and Tuuri, H 1996 Seasonal changes in platform use by farmed blue foxes (Alopex lagopus). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 48: 99–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidfors, L 1997 Behavioural effects of environmental enrichment for individually caged rabbits. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 52: 157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, K 1963 On Aggression. Harcourt, Brace and World: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Martin, P and Bateson, P 1986 Measuring Behaviour: an Introductory Guide, 2nd edition pp 84–100. Cambridge University Press: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Mononen, J, Harri, M and Rekilä, T 1996a Comparison of preferences of farmed silver and blue foxes for cages with and without a nest box. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 46: 117–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mononen, J, Korhonen, H and Harri, M 1996b Resting platforms for farmed foxes: a short review. Animal Production Reviews, Applied Science Reports 29: 180–183Google Scholar
Newberry, R C 1994 Environmental enrichment: bringing nature to captivity. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology pp 51–67. Ministry of Agriculture, National Institute of Animal Science: Foulum, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
Pearce, G P and Paterson, A M 1993 The effect of space restriction and provision of toys during rearing on the behaviour, productivity and physiology of male pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 36: 11–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, G P, Paterson, A M and Pearce, A N 1989 The influence of pleasant and unpleasant handling and the provision of toys on the growth and behaviour of male pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23: 27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, V 1992 Handling of silver foxes at different ages pre-weaning and post-weaning and effects on later behaviour and stress-sensitivity. Norwegian Journal of Agricultural Science (Suppl) 9: 529–535Google Scholar
Pedersen, V and Jeppesen, L L 1990 Effects of early handling on later behaviour and stress responses in silver foxes ( Vulpes vulpes). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 26: 383–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prestrud, P 1992 Food habits and observations of the hunting behaviour of arctic foxes, Alopex lagopus, in Svalbard. Canadian Field-Naturalist 106: 225–236Google Scholar
Rekilä, T, Harri, M and Mononen, J 1997 Feeding test as a measure of fear in farmed foxes. In: Hemsworth P H, Spinka M and Kostal L (eds) Proceedings of the 31st International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology p 211. Ministry of Agriculture, National Institute of Animal Science: Foulum, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
Rekilä, T, Mononen, J and Harri, M 1996 Effect of inside-cage and outside-cage environment on behaviour test performance of blue foxes (Alopex lagopus). Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 46: 247–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute Inc 1990 SAS Procedures Guide, Version 6, 3rd edition 705 pp. SAS Institute Inc: Cary, USAGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, A I, Salomons, M O, Tong, A K W, Sather, A P and Lepage, P 1990 The effect of environment enrichment on aggression in newly weaned pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 27: 41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wemelsfelder, F and Birke, L 1997 Environmental challenge. In: Appleby, M C and Hughes, B O (eds) Animal Welfare pp 35–48. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar