Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:43:17.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An update on halal slaughter: Current methods and ongoing research on halal meat production techniques and their implications for animal welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

A Fuseini ,
M Teye  and
J Lever
A Fuseini*
Affiliation:
University of Huddersfield Business School, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK AHDB, Stoneleigh Park, Kenilworth CV8 2TL, UK
M Teye
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Ghana
J Lever
Affiliation:
University of Huddersfield Business School, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence: awalfus@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The ethical and economic significance of slaughtering animals for consumption by people of faith cannot be underestimated. On one hand, there are concerns for the welfare of animals during rearing, transport and slaughter, on the other, the market for halal meat products continues to grow at an exponential rate which has attracted the attention of independent and mainstream retailers. This paper considers the slaughter methods approved for the main animal species slaughtered for consumption by Muslims: beef, lamb, goats and poultry. It further examines the rationale for approving and rejecting certain methods of stunning and the implications this has for the welfare of animals. Areas where further research is needed to improve animal welfare during halal slaughter are also highlighted, and the authors have argued why a dialogue between animal welfare researchers, Islamic scholars and halal certification or accreditation bodies is vital in creating knowledge exchange between key stakeholders with a view to improving animal welfare during halal meat production.

Keywords

animal welfareblood losshalal slaughtermeatstunning and slaughterslaughter without stunning
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , May 2022 , pp. 269 - 276
Copyright
© 2022 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Aghwan, ZA, Bello, AU, Abubakar, AA, Imlan, JC and Sazili, AQ 2016 Efficient halal bleeding, animal handling, and welfare: A holistic approach for meat quality. Meat Science 121: 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.06.028CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anil, H 2012 Effects of slaughter method on carcass and meat char-acteristics in the meat of cattle and sheep. AHDB Report. https://pro-jectblue.blob.core.windows.net/media/Default/Research%20Papers/Beef%20&%20Lamb/slaughter_and_meat_quality_feb_2012-final-report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Anil, MH and McKinstry, JL 1991 Reflexes and loss of sensibility following head-to-body electrical stunning in sheep. The Veterinary Record 128: 106–107. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.128.5.106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackmore, DK and Newhook, JC 1982 Electroencephalographic studies of stunning and slaughter of sheep and calves-Part 3: The duration of sensibility induced by electrical stunning in sheep and calves. Meat Science 7: 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(82)90094-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dialrel 2010 Report on good and adverse practices-Animal welfare con-cerns in relation to slaughter practices from the viewpoint of veterinary sci-ences. http://www.dialrel.eu/images/veterinary-concerns.pdfGoogle Scholar
Farouk, MM, Al-Mazeedi, HM, Sabow, AB, Bekhit, AED, Adeyemi, KD and Sazili, AQ 2014 Halal and Kosher slaughter methods and meat quality: A review. Meat Science 98: 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.05.021CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farouk, MM, Pufpaff, KM and Amir, M 2016 Industrial halal meat production and animal welfare: a review. Meat Science 120: 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.023CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FSA 2018 Results of the 2018 FSA survey into slaughter methods in England and Wales. Food Standards Agency: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Fuseini, A 2019 The development and practical implementation of Single Pulse Ultra-High Current (SPUC) for the humane and halal com-pliant slaughter of cattle. https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/218702974/Final_Cop y_2019_11_28_Fuseini_A_PhD_Redacted.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fuseini, A and Knowles, TG 2020 The ethics of halal meat con-sumption: preferences of consumers in England according to the method of slaughter. Veterinary Record: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.105287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuseini, A, Knowles, TG and Hadley, PJ 2020 Halal food mar-keting: An evaluation of UK halal standards. Journal of Islamic Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-02-2020-0037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuseini, A, Knowles, TG, Lines, JA, Hadley, PJ and Wotton, SB 2016 The stunning and slaughter of cattle within the EU: a review of the current situation with regard to the halal market. Animal Welfare 25: 365–376. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.25.3.365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuseini, A, Teye, M, Wotton, SB, Lines, JA and Knowles, TG 2018 Electrical water bath stunning for halal poultry meat production: animal welfare issues and compatibility with the halal rules. CAB Reviews 13: 016. https://doi.org/10.1079/PAVSNNR201813016Google Scholar
Fuseini, A, Wotton, SB, Hadley, PJ and Knowles, TG 2017 The perception and acceptability of pre-slaughter and post-slaughter stunning for halal production: The views of UK Islamic scholars and halal consumers. Meat Science 123: 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.09.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentle, MJ 2011 Pain issues in poultry. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 135: 252–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.10.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerritzen, MA, van Hattum, T and Reimert, H 2015 Efficacy of the Dutch Vision high-low electrical head-only poultry stunner. Livestock Research Report 442: 23Google Scholar
Gibson, TJ, Johnson, CB, Murrell, JC, Hulls, CM, Mitchinson, SL, Stafford, KJ, Johnstone, AC and Mellor, DJ 2009 Electroencephalograhic responses of halothane-anaesthetised calves to slaughter by ventral neck incision without prior stunning. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 57: 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2009.36882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandin, T and Regenstein, JM 1994 Religious slaughter and animal welfare: A discussion for meat scientists. Meat Focus International 3: 115–123Google Scholar
Gregory, NG, Fielding, HR, von Wenzlawowicz, M and von Hollenben, K 2010 Time to collapse following slaughter without stunning in cattle. Meat Science 85: 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.12.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, NG, von Wenzlawowicz, M, von Hollenben, K, Fielding, HR, Gibson, TJ, Mirabito, L and Kolesar, R 2012 Complications during shechita and halal slaughter without stun-ning in cattle. Animal Welfare 21: 81–86. https://doi.org/10.7120/096272812X13353700593680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, NG and Wilkins, LJ 1989 Broken bones in domestic birds: handling and processing damage in end of lay hens. British Poultry Science 30: 555–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668908417179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindle, VA, Lambooij, E, Reimmert, HGM, Workel, LD and Gerritzen, MA 2010 Animal welfare concerns during the use of the water bath for stunning broilers, hens and ducks. Poultry Science 89: 401–412. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00297CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karzewski, J 2011 Stunning evolution: Technology has refined the pro-cess of humane slaughter. Meat and Poultry Magazine, Sosland Publishing: Kansas City, USAGoogle Scholar
Khalid, R, Knowles, TG and Wotton, SB 2015 A comparison of blood loss during the halal slaughter of lambs following traditional religious slaughter without stunning, electric head-only stunning and post-cut electric head-only stunning. Meat Science 110: 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.06.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lambooij, E and Hindle, VA 2012 Restraining and neck cutting or stunning and neck cutting of veal calves. Meat Science 91: 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.11.041CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lambooy, E 1982 Electrical stunning of sheep. Meat Science 6: 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(82)90022-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lever, J and Fischer, J 2018 Religion, regulation and consumption: Globalising kosher and halal markets pp 1–183. Manchester University Press: Manchester, UK. https://doi.org/10.7228/manch-ester/9781526103642.003.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orford, F, Ford, EA, Brown, SN, McKinstry, JL, Hadley, PJ, Lines, J, Knowles, TG and Wotton, S 2016 The evaluation of two commercial electric sheep stunning systems: current applied and the effect on heart function. Animal Welfare 25: 331–337. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.25.3.331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacock, J and Mendez, S 2020 Measuring Better Chicken Commitment-compliant chicken supply chain: Report E018R01 pp 2–5. The Humane League Labs: Rockville, USA. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/8v2k9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raj, ABM, O’Callaghan, M and Knowles, TG 2006 Effects of amount and frequency of alternating current used in water bath stunning and of slaughter methods on electroencephalograms in broilers. Animal Welfare 15: 7–18Google Scholar
Rao, MA, Knowles, TG and Wotton, SB 2013 The effect of pre-stun shocks in electrical water bath stunners on carcase and meat quality in broilers. Animal Welfare 22: 79–84. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.22.1.079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rault, JL, Hemsworth, PH, Cakebread, PL, Mellor, DJ and Johnson, CB 2014 Evaluation of microwave energy as a humane stunning technique based on electroencephalography (EEG) of anaesthetised cattle. Animal Welfare 23: 391–400. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.23.4.391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahdan, IA, Regenstein, JM, Shahabuddin, ASM and Rahman, MT 2016 Developing control points for halal slaughtering of poultry. Poultry Science 95: 1680–1692. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew092CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shields, SJ and Raj, ABM 2010 Critical review of electrical water bath stun systems for poultry slaughter and recent developments in alternative technologies. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 13: 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2010.507119CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Small, A, Lea, J, Niemeyer, D, Hughes, J, McLean, D and McLean, J 2019 Development of a microwave stunning system for cattle 2: Preliminary observations on behavioural responses and EEG. Research in Veterinary Science 122: 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2018.11.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Small, A, Ralph, J, McLean, D, Keates, H and Owen, JS 2013 Preliminary investigations into the use of microwave energy for reversible stunning of sheep. Animal Welfare 22: 291–296. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.22.2.291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparrey, JM and Kettlewell, PJ 1994 Shackling of poultry: is it a welfare problem? World Poultry Science Association 50: 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19940014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wotton, SB, Gregory, NG, Whittington, PE and Parkman, ID 2000 Electrical stunning of cattle. Veterinary Record 147: 681–684Google ScholarPubMed