Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:51:46.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effectiveness of animal health and welfare planning in dairy herds: a review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

L Tremetsberger  and
C Winckler
L Tremetsberger*
Affiliation:
Division of Livestock Sciences, Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-Str 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria
C Winckler
Affiliation:
Division of Livestock Sciences, Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-Str 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria
*
* Contact for correspondence and request for reprints: lukas.tremetsberger@boku.ac.at
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Maintaining and promoting animal health and welfare are important but challenging goals in livestock farming. Animal health and welfare planning aims to contribute to improvements in the herd through interventions in a structured way. This review provides an overview of current scientific approaches to and improvements achieved by health and welfare planning in dairy herds regarding the health and welfare state of the cows, economic effects, and non-monetary benefits to farmers. Implementation of changes in management and housing is based on an assessment of the health and welfare state and relies on the participation of all involved persons. Farm-specific measures of management and housing, high levels of compliance with those measures, continuous review, and prompt adaptation are decisive. Improvements in health and welfare following the use of planning have been shown by several on-farm studies, especially in the context of mastitis and lameness. Studies on health and welfare planning that consider a more comprehensive view of welfare are scarce and the limited evidence available indicates that improvements may be less likely to be achieved. Apart from health and welfare benefits for the animals, economic and non-monetary benefits for the farmers are equally important. Costs of diseases and impaired health are available, while costs and benefits of interventions have been estimated with regard to mastitis and lameness only. Non-monetary factors (eg job satisfaction) have been reported as motivating factors for farmers but have attracted little scientific interest. Further research should focus on welfare aspects that go beyond the most important production diseases and the economic and non-monetary benefits of improving health and welfare in dairy cattle.

Keywords

animal welfarecostsdairy cowsimprovement strategiesnon-monetary benefitson-farm welfare assessment
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , February 2015 , pp. 55 - 67
Copyright
© 2015 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Alban, L, Ersbøll, AK, Bennedsgaard, TW and Johnsen, PF 2001 Validation of welfare assessment methods at herd level: an example. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A, Animal Science, Supplement 30: 99–102Google Scholar
Barker, ZE, Leach, KA, Whay, HR, Bell, NJ and Main, DCJ 2010 Assessment of lameness prevalence and associated risk factors in dairy herds in England and Wales. Journal of Dairy Science 93: 932–941. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2309CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker, ZE, Wright, JL, Blowey, RW, Amory, JR and Green, LE 2012 Uptake and effectiveness of interventions to reduce claw lesions in 40 dairy herds in the UK. Animal Welfare 21: 563–576. http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/09627286.21.4.563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, AP 2006 Does multi-functionality affect technical effi-ciency? A non-parametric analysis of the Scottish dairy industry. Journal of Environmental Management 80: 287–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.09.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, AP, Rutherford, KMD, Langford, FM and Haskell, MJ 2011 The effect of lameness prevalence on technical efficiency at the dairy farm level: an adjusted data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of Dairy Science 94: 5449–5457. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4262CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartussek, H 1999 A review of the animal needs index (ANI) for the assessment of animals' well-being in the housing systems for Austrian proprietary products and legislation. Livestock Production Science 61: 179–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00067-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, NJ, Bell, MJ, Knowles, TG, Whay, HR, Main, DJ and Webster, AJF 2009 The development, implementation and testing of a lameness control programme based on HACCP prin-ciples and designed for heifers on dairy farms. The Veterinary Journal 180: 178–188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.05.020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, NJ, Main, DCJ, Whay, HR, Knowles, TG, Bell, MJ and Webster, AJF 2006 Herd health planning: farmers' perceptions in relation to lameness and mastitis. Veterinary Record 159: 699–705. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.159.21.699CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennedsgaard, TW, Klaas, IC and Vaarst, M 2010 Reducing use of antimicrobials: experience from an intervention study in organic dairy herds in Denmark. Livestock Science 131: 183–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.03.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boissy, A, Manteuffel, G, Jensen, MB, Moe, RO, Spruijt, B, Keeling, LJ, Winckler, C, Forkman, B, Dimitrov, I, Langbein, J, Bakken, M, Veissier, I and Aubert, A 2007 Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Physiology and Behavior 92: 375–397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.02.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonde, M, Rousing, T and Sørensen, JT 2001 Structure of the welfare assessment report for communication with farmers. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A, Animal Science, Supplement 30: 58–61Google Scholar
Bracke, MBM 2007 Animal-based parameters are no panacea for on-farm monitoring of animal welfare. Animal Welfare 16: 229–231Google Scholar
Brenninkmeyer, C, Dippel, S, Brinkmann, J, March, S, Winckler, C and Knierim, U 2013 Hock lesion epidemiology in cubicle housed dairy cows across two breeds, farming systems and countries. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 109: 236–245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.10.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brinkmann, J and March, S 2010 Tiergesundheit in der ökologischen Milchviehhaltung, Status quo sowie (Weiter-) Entwicklung, Anwendung und Beurteilung eines präventiven Konzeptes zur Herdengesundheitsplanung. PhD Thesis, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. [Title translation: Animal health in organic dairy farning: health state as well as development, application and evaluation of a preventative herd health planning concept]Google Scholar
Bruijnis, MRN, Hogeveen, H and Stassen, EN 2010 Assessing economic consequences of foot disorders in dairy cattle using a dynamic stochastic simulation model. Journal of Dairy Science 93:2419–2432. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2721CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruijnis, MRN, Hogeveen, H and Stassen, EN 2013 Measures to improve dairy cow foot health: consequences for farmer income and dairy cow welfare. Animal 7: 167–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112001383CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaplin, S and Munksgaard, L 2001 Evaluation of a simple method for assessment of rising behaviour in tethered dairy cows. Animal Science 72: 191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, NB and Nordlund, KV 2009 The influence of the envi-ronment on dairy cow behavior, claw health and herd lameness dynamics. The Veterinary Journal 179: 360–369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.09.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, WW, Seiford, LM and Tone, K 2003 Data Envelopment Analysis. A Comprehensive Text With Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software. Kluwer Academic Publisher: Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Derks, M, van Werven, T, Hogeveen, H and Kremer, WD 2013 Veterinary herd health management programs on dairy farms in the Netherlands: use, execution, and relations to farmer characteristics. Journal of Dairy Science 96: 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dippel, S, Dolezal, M, Brenninkmeyer, C, Brinkmann, J, March, S, Knierim, U and Winckler, C 2009 Risk factors for lameness in freestall-housed dairy cows across two breeds, farming systems, and countries. Journal of Dairy Science 92: 5476–5486. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2288CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dyson, RG, Allen, R, Camanho, AS, Podinovski, VV, Sarrico, CS and Shale, EA 2001 Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 132: 245–259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00149-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enting, H, Kooij, D, Dijkhuizen, AA, Huirne, RBM and Noordhuizen-Stassen, EN 1997 Economic losses due to clinical lameness in dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 49:259–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(97)00051-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ettema, JF and ⊘stergaard, S 2006 Economic decision making on prevention and control of clinical lameness in Danish dairy herds. Livestock Science 102: 92–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.11.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission 2007 Attitudes of EU citizens towards animal welfare. Special Eurobarometer 270. EU: Brussels, Belgium. http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/-survey/sp_barometer_fa_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Flower, FC and Weary, DM 2009 Gait assessment in dairy cattle. Animal 3: 87–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731108003194CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, D, Weary, DM, Pajor, EA and Milligan, BN 1997 A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Animal Welfare 6: 187–205.Google Scholar
Garforth, CJ 2011 Effective communication to improve udder health: can social science help? In: Hogeveen, H and Lam, TJGM (eds) Udder Health and Communication pp 55–66. Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands. http://dx.doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-742-4_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goeritz, M, Oppermann, R, Müller-Arnke, I, Rahmann, G, March, S, Brinkmann, J and Schumacher, U 2007 Acceptance of animal health plans: results of a survey at 60 farms. In: Zikeli, S, Claupein, W, Dabbert, S, Kaufmann, B, Müller, T and Valle Zárate, A (eds) Proceedings of the 9th German Scientific Conference on Organic Agriculture pp 601–604. 20-22 March 2007, Hohenheim, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Gratzer, ET 2011 Animal health and welfare planning in Austrian organic dairy farms. PhD Thesis, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
Gray, D and Hovi, M 2002 Animal health plans for organic farms: the UK experience. In: Hovi, M and Vaarst, M (eds) Positive Health: Preventive Measures and Alternative Strategies. Proceedings of the 5th NAHWOA Workshop pp 132–143. 11-13 November 2001, Rødding, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
Green, MJ, Leach, KA, Breen, JE, Green, LE and Bradley, AJ 2007 National intervention study of mastitis control in dairy herds in England and Wales. Veterinary Record 160: 287–293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.160.9.287CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagnestam-Nielsen, C and ⊘stergaard, S 2009 Economic impact of clinical mastitis in a dairy herd assessed by stochastic simulation using different methods to model yield losses. Animal 3:315–328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731108003352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halasa, T, Huijps, K, ⊘sterås, O and Hogeveen, H 2007 Economic effects of bovine mastitis and mastitis management: a review. Veterinary Quarterly 29: 18–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2007.9695224CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansson, H, Szczensa-Rundberg, M and Nielsen, C 2011 Which preventive measures against mastitis can increase the technical efficiency of dairy farms? Animal 5: 632–640. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731110002247CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemsworth, PH, Coleman, GJ, Barnett, JL, Borg, S and Dowling, S 2002 The effects of cognitive behavioral intervention on the attitude and behavior of stockpersons and the behavior and productivity of commercial dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 80: 68–78CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirst, WM, Murray, RD, Ward, WR and French, NP 2002 A mixed-effects time-to-event analysis of the relationship between first-lactation lameness and subsequent lameness in dairy cows in the UK. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 54: 191–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(02)00021-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogeveen, H, Huijps, K and Lam, TJGM 2011 Economic aspects of mastitis: new developments. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 59:16–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2011.547165CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hovi, M, Gray, D, Vaarst, M, Striezel, A, Walkenhorst, M and Roderick, S 2004 Promoting health and welfare through planning. In: Vaarst, M, Roderick, S, Lund, V and Lockeretz, W (eds) Animal Health and Welfare in Organic Agriculture pp 253–278. CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9780851996684.0253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huijps, K, Lam, TJGM and Hogeveen, H 2008 Costs of mastitis: facts and perception. Journal of Dairy Research 75: 113–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022029907002932CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huijps, K, Hogeveen, H, Lam, TJGM and Oude Lansink, AGJM 2010 Costs and efficacy of management measures to improve udder health on Dutch dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 93: 115–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2412CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hultgren, J and Svensson, C 2009 Lifetime risk and cost of clinical mastitis in dairy cows in relation to heifer rearing conditions in southwest Sweden. Journal of Dairy Science 92: 3274–3280. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1678CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huxley, JN, Burke, J, Roderick, S, Main, DCJ and Whay, HR 2004 Animal welfare assessment benchmarking as a tool for health and welfare planning in organic dairy herds. Veterinary Record 155: 237–239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.155.8.237CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inchaisri, C, Jorritsma, R, Vos, PL, van der Weijden, GC and Hogeveen, H 2010 Economic consequences of reproductive performance in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 74: 835–846. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.04.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ito, K, Weary, DM and von Keyserlingk, MAG 2009 Lying behavior: Assessing within- and between- herd variation in free-stall-housed dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 92: 4412–4420. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2235CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ivemeyer, S, Maeschli, A, Walkenhorst, M, Klocke, P, Heil, F, Oser, S and Notz, C 2008 Effects of a two-year dairy herd health management programme on udder health, use of antibi-otics and longevity. Schweizer Archiv für Tierheilkunde 150: 499–505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1024/0036-7281.150.10.499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivemeyer, S, Raillard, D, Heil, F and Klocke, P 2007 Database-system for herd health management of dairy herds especially for udder health. Schweizer Archiv für Tierheilkunde 149: 449–456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1024/0036-7281.149.10.449CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ivemeyer, S, Smolders, G, Brinkmann, J, Gratzer, E, Hansen, B, Henriksen, BIF, Huber, J, Leeb, C, March, S, Mejdell, C, Nicholas, P, Roderick, S, Stöger, E, Vaarst, M, Whistance, LK, Winckler, C and Walkenhorst, M 2012 Impact of animal health and welfare planning on medicine use, herd health and production in European organic dairy farms. Livestock Science 145: 63–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.12.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivemeyer, S, Walkenhorst, M, Heil, F, Notz, C, Maeschli, A, Butler, G and Klocke, P 2009 Management factors affecting udder health and effects of a one year extension program in organic dairy herds. Animal 3: 1596–1604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731109990498CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jansen, J, van den Borne, BHP, Renes, RJ, van Schaik, G, Lam, TJGM and Leeuwis, C 2009 Explaining mastitis incidence in Dutch dairy farming: the influence of farmers' attitudes and behaviour. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 92: 210–223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.08.015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knierim, U and Winckler, C 2009 On-farm welfare assessment in cattle: validity, reliability and feasibility issues and future perspectives with special regard to the Welfare Quality® approach. Animal Welfare 18: 451–458Google Scholar
Kossaibati, MA and Esslemont, RJ 1997 The costs of production diseases in dairy herds in England. The Veterinary Journal 154:41–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1090-0233(05)80007-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kristensen, E and Enevoldsen, C 2008 A mixed methods inquiry: how dairy farmers perceive the value(s) of their involvement in an intensive dairy herd health management program. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-50-50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KTBL (Kuratorium für Technik und Bauwesen in der Landwirtschaft; German Association for Technology and Structures in Agriculture) 2010 KTBL-Datensammlung Ökologis-cher Landbau, Daten für die Betriebsplanung, First Edition. KTBL: Darmstadt, Germany. [Title translation: Organic farming databank]Google Scholar
Lawson, LG, Agger, JF, Lund, M and Coelli, T 2004 Lameness, metabolic and digestive disorders, and technical efficiency in Danish dairy herds: a stochastic frontier production function approach. Livestock Production Science 91: 157–172. http://dx.d oi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.07.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, KA, Whay, HR, Maggs, CM, Barker, ZE, Paul, ES, Bell, AK and Main, DCJ 2010a Working towards a reduction in cattle lameness: 1. Understanding barriers to lameness control on dairy farms. Research in Veterinary Science 89: 311–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.02.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leach, KA, Whay, HR, Maggs, CM, Barker, ZE, Paul, ES, Bell, AK and Main, DCJ 2010b Working towards a reduction in cattle lameness:2. Understanding dairy farmers' motivations. Research in Veterinary Science 89: 318–323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.02.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeb, C, Bernardi, F and Winckler, C 2010 Einführung und Monitoring von ‘BetriebsEntwicklungsPlänen (BEP) Tiergesundheit und Wohlbefinden’ in Österreichischen Bioschweinebetrieben. Final report project 100188, Vienna, Austria. [Title translation: Implementation and monitoring of health and welfare plans in Austrian organic pig farms]Google Scholar
Lund, V, Coleman, G, Gunnarsson, S, Appleby, MC and Karkinen, K 2006 Animal welfare science: working at the interface between the natural and social sciences. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 97: 37–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.11.017Google Scholar
Main, DCJ, Leach, KA, Barker, ZE, Sedgwick, AK, Maggs, CM, Bell, NJ and Whay, HR 2012 Evaluating an intervention to reduce lameness in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 95: 2946–2954. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4678CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Main, DCJ, Whay, HR, Green, LE and Webster, AJF 2003 Effect of the RSPCA Freedom Food scheme on the welfare of dairy cattle. Veterinary Record 153: 227–231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.153.8.227CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Main, DCJ, Whay, HR, Leeb, C and Webster, AJF 2007 Formal animal-based welfare assessment in UK certification schemes. Animal Welfare 16: 233–236Google Scholar
March, S, Brinkmann, J, Winckler, C, Goeritz, M, Oppermann, R and Rahmann, G 2007 Herd health plans and herd health indicators from the point of view of organic milk producers: preliminary results of a pilot study in Germany. In: Zikeli, S, Claupein, W, Dabbert, S, Kaufmann, B, Müller, T and Valle Zárate, A (eds) Proceedings of the 9th German Scientific Conference on Organic Agriculture pp 597–600. 20-22 March 2007, Hohenheim, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Millman, ST, Duncan, IJH, Stauffacher, M and Stookey, JA 2004 The impact of applied ethologists and the International Society for Applied Ethology in improving animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 86: 299–311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.02.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, P and Jasinska, A 2008 Animal health and welfare planning: a review. Proceedings of the 1st CORE Organic ANIPLAN Workshop pp 1–39. 9-12 October 2007, Hellevad, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
Plesch, G, Broerkens, N, Laister, S, Winckler, C and Knierim, U 2010 Reliability and feasibility of selected measures concerning resting behaviour for the on-farm welfare assessment in dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 126: 19–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2010.05.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, KMD, Langford, FM, Jack, MC, Sherwood, L, Lawrence, AB and Haskell, MJ 2008 Hock injury prevalence and associated risk factors on organic and nonorganic dairy farms in the United Kingdom. Journal of Dairy Science 91: 2265–2274. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0847CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Šárová, R, Stěhulová, I, Kratinová, P, Firla, P and Špinka, M 2011 Farm managers underestimate lameness prevalence in Czech dairy herds. Animal Welfare 20: 201–204Google Scholar
Sibley, R 2006 Developing health plans for the dairy herd. In Practice 28: 114–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/inpract.28.3.114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, JT, Rousing, T, Møller, SH, Bonde, M and Hegelund, L 2007 On-farm welfare assessment systems: what are the recording costs? Animal Welfare 16: 237–239Google Scholar
Stokes, JR, Tozer, PR and Hyde, J 2007 Identifying efficient dairy producers using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Dairy Science 90: 2555–2562. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-596CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Telezhenko, E, Bergsten, C, Magnusson, M and Nilsson, C 2009 Effect of different flooring systems on claw conformation of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 92: 2625–2633. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1798CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uzmay, A, Koyubenbe, N and Armagan, G 2009 Measurement of efficiency using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and social factors affecting the technical efficiency in dairy cattle farms within the province of Izmir, Turkey. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 8: 1110–1115Google Scholar
Vaarst, M 2003 Evaluating a concept for an animal welfare assess-ment system providing decision support using qualitative inter-views. Animal Welfare 12: 541–546Google Scholar
Vaarst, M, Nissen, TB, ⊘stergaard, S, Klaas, IC, Bennedsgaard, TW and Christensen, J 2007 Danish stable schools for experiential common learning in groups of organic dairy farmers. Journal of Dairy Science 90: 2543–2554. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-607CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaarst, M, Paarup-Laursen, B, Houe, H, Fossing, C and Andersen, HJ 2002 Farmers' choice of medical treatment of mastitis in Danish dairy herds based on qualitative research inter-views. Journal of Dairy Science 85: 992–1001. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74159-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaarst, M, Bennedsgaard, TW, Klaas, I, Nissen, TB, Thamsborg, SM and ⊘stergaard, S 2006 Development and daily management of an explicit strategy of nonuse of antimicro-bial drugs in twelve Danish organic dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 89: 1842–1853. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72253-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaarst, M, Winckler, C, Roderick, S, Smolders, G, Ivemeyer, S, Brinkmann, J, Mejdell, CM, Whistance, LK, Nicholas, P, Walkenhorst, M, Leeb, C, March, S, Henriksen, BIF, Stöger, E, Gratzer, E, Hansen, B and Huber, J 2011 Animal health and welfare planning in organic dairy cattle farms. The Open Veterinary Science Journal 5: 19–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874318801105010019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valeeva, NI, Lam, TJGM and Hogeveen, H 2007 Motivation of dairy farmers to improve mastitis management. Journal of Dairy Science 90: 4466–4477. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0095CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Keyserlingk, MAG, Barrientos, A, Ito, K, Galo, E and Weary, DM 2012 Benchmarking cow comfort on North American freestall dairies: Lameness, leg injuries, lying time, facility design, and management for high-producing Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 95: 7399–7408. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5807CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waiblinger, S, Knierim, U and Winckler, C 2001 The devel-opment of an epidemiologically based on-farm welfare assessment system for use with dairy cows. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A, Animal Science. Supplement 30: 73–77Google Scholar
Weary, DM and Taszkun, I 2000 Hock lesions and free-stall design. Journal of Dairy Science 83: 697–702. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74931-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welfare Quality® 2009 Welfare Quality® Assessment Protocol for Cattle. Welfare Quality® Consortium: Lelystad, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Wemelsfelder, F, Hunter, TEA, Mendl, MT and Lawrence, AB 2001 Assessing the ‘whole animal’: a free choice profiling approach. Animal Behaviour 62: 209–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whay, HR 2007 The journey to animal welfare improvement. Animal Welfare 16: 117–122Google Scholar
Whay, HR and Main, DCJ 2010 Improving animal welfare: practical approaches for achieving change. In: Grandin, T (ed) Improving Animal Welfare: A Practical Approach pp 227–251. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Whay, HR, Main, DCJ, Green, LE and Webster, AJF 2002 Farmer perception of lameness prevalence. In: Shearer, JK (ed) Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Lameness in Ruminants pp 355–358. 9-13 January 2002, Orlando, USAGoogle Scholar
Whay, HR, Main, DCJ, Green, LE and Webster, AJF 2003 Assessment of the welfare of dairy cattle using animal-based measurements: direct observations and investigation of farm records. Veterinary Record 153: 197–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.153.7.197CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winckler, C and Willen, S 2001 The reliability and repeatability of a lameness scoring system for use as an indicator of welfare in dairy cattle. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A, Animal Science, Supplement 30: 103–107Google Scholar
Windschnurer, I, Schmied, C, Boivin, X and Waiblinger, S 2008 Reliability and inter-test relationship of tests for on-farm assessment of dairy cows' relationship to humans. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 114: 37–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.01.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yalcin, C 2000 Cost of mastitis in Scottish dairy herds with low and high subclinical mastitis problems. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 24: 465–472Google Scholar
Zurbrigg, K, Kelton, D, Anderson, N and Millman, S 2005 Tie-stall design and its relationship to lameness, injury, and clean-liness on 317 Ontario dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 88:3201–3210. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73003-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed