Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:12:12.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of environment and breed on growth performance and meat quality of fattening pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

J Li ,
Q Han ,
R Liu ,
P Wen ,
W Ji ,
L Pan ,
C Wang ,
P Zhao ,
H Liu  and
J Bao
J Li
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, Hei Longjiang 150030, PR China
Q Han
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, Hei Longjiang 150030, PR China
R Liu
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, Hei Longjiang 150030, PR China
P Wen
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, Hei Longjiang 150030, PR China
W Ji
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, Hei Longjiang 150030, PR China
L Pan
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, Hei Longjiang 150030, PR China
C Wang
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, Hei Longjiang 150030, PR China
P Zhao
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, Hei Longjiang 150030, PR China
H Liu*
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, Hei Longjiang 150030, PR China Key Laboratory of Swine Facilities Engineering, Ministry of Agriculture, Harbin 150030, PR China
J Bao*
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, Hei Longjiang 150030, PR China
*
* Contact for correspondence: liuhonggui1312@163.com/jbao@neau.edu.cn
* Contact for correspondence: liuhonggui1312@163.com/jbao@neau.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Meat quality is not only influenced by breed but also rearing environment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different housing environments on growth performance, carcase traits, meat quality, physiological response pre-slaughter and fatty acid composition in two pig breeds. A total of 120 growing pigs at 60-70 days of age were arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial design with the breeds (Duroc × Landrace × Large White [D × L × LW] and Duroc × Landrace × Min pig [D × L × M]) and environmental enrichment (barren concrete floor or enriched with straw bedding) as factors. Each treatment was performed in triplicate with ten pigs per replicate. The pigs housed in the enriched environment exhibited a higher average daily gain, average daily feed intake, saturated fatty acid percentage and backfat depth than the pigs reared in the barren environment. Plasma cortisol levels were lower and growth hormone higher in enriched compared to barren pens. The D × L × M pigs showed lower cooking loss compared with the D × L × LW pigs. Moreover, the D × L × M pigs exhibited poor growth performance but had a better water-holding capacity. Only carcase traits and meat quality interaction effects were observed. We concluded that an enriched environment can reduce preslaughter stress and improve the growth performance of pigs and modulate the fatty acid composition of pork products.

Keywords

animal welfareenvironmentgrowth performancemeat qualitypig breedpigs
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , May 2020 , pp. 177 - 184
Copyright
© 2020 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Aguayo-Ulloa, LA, Pascual-Alonso, M, Campo, MM, Olleta, JL, Villarroel, M, Pizarro, DM and María, GA 2014 Effects of an enriched housing environment on sensory aspects and fatty-acid composition of the longissimus muscle of light-weight finished lambs. Meat Science 97: 490–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.02.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Averós, X, Brossard, L, Dourmad, JY, de Greef, KH, Edge, HL, Edwards, SA and Meunier-Salaün, MC 2010 A meta-analysis of the combined effect of housing and environmental enrichment characteristics on the behaviour and performance of pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 127: 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2010.09.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beattie, VE, O’Connell, NE and Moss, BW 2000 Influence of environmental enrichment on the behaviour, performance and meat quality of domestic pigs. Livestock Production Science 65: 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00179-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bee, G, Guex, G and Herzog, W 2004 Free-range rearing of pigs during the winter: adaptations in muscle fiber characteristics and effects on adipose tissue composition and meat quality traits. Journal of Animal Science 82: 1206–1218. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.8241206xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berthiaume, R, Mandell, I, Faucitano, L and Lafrenière, C 2006 Comparison of alternative beef production systems based on forage finishing or grain-forage diets with or without growth promotants: 1. Feedlot performance, carcass quality, and production costs. Journal of Animal Science 84: 2168–2177. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-328CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolhuis, JE, Schouten, WGP, Schrama, JW and Wiegant, VM 2006 Effects of rearing and housing environment on behav-iour and performance of pigs with different coping characteristics. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 101: 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonneau, M and Lebret, B 2010 Production systems and influ-ence on eating quality of pork. Meat Science 84: 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.03.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulens, A, Van Beirendonck, S, Van Thielen, J, Buys, N and Driessen, B 2015 Straw applications in growing pigs: Effects on behavior, straw use and growth. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 169: 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.04.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daza, A, Mateos, A, Rey, AI, Ovejero, I and Lópezbote, CJ 2007 Effect of duration of feeding under free-range conditions on production results and carcass and fat quality in Iberian pigs. Meat Science 76: 411–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.10.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enser, M 2001 The role of fats in human nutrition. Oils and Fats2: 77–122Google Scholar
Faucitano, L, Chouinard, PY, Fortin, J, Mandell, IB and Berthiaume, R 2008 Comparison of alternative beef production systems based on forage finishing or grain-forage diets with or without growth promotants: 2. meat quality, fatty acid composition, and overall palatability. Journal of Animal Science 86: 1678–1689. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0756CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fàbrega, E, Marcet-Rius, M, Vidal, R, Escribano, D, Cerón, JJ, Manteca, X and Velarde, A 2019 The effects of environmental enrichment on the physiology, behaviour, productivity and meat quality of pigs raised in a hot climate. Animals 9: 235. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9050235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentry, JG, McGlone, JJ, Miller, MF and Blanton, Jr Jr 2002 Diverse birth and rearing environment effects on pig growth and meat quality. Journal of Animal Science 80: 1707–1715. https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.8071707xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentry, JG, McGlone, JJ, Miller, MF and Blanton, Jr Jr 2004 Environmental effects on pig performance, meat quality, and mus-cle characteristics. Journal of Animal Science 82: 209–217. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.821209xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gondret, F, Combes, S, Lefaucheur, L and Lebret, B 2005 Effects of exercise during growth and alternative rearing systems on muscle fibers and collagen properties. Reproduction Nutrition Development 45: 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2005003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, YHB, Warner, RD and Rosenvold, K 2014 Influence of high pre-rigor temperature and fast pH fall on muscle proteins and meat quality: a review. Animal Production Science 54: 375–395. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klont, RE, Hulsegge, B, Hoving-Bolink, AH, Gerritzen, MA, Kurt, E, Winkelman-Goedhart, HA, de Jong, IC and Kranen, RW 2001 Relationships between behavioral and meat quality characteristics of pigs raised under barren and enriched housing conditions. Journal of Animal Science 79: 2835–2843. https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.79112835xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Labroue, F, Goumy, S, Gruand, J, Mourot, J, Neelz, V and Legault, C 2000 Comparison with Large White of four local breeds of pigs for growth, carcass and meat quality traits. Journées de la Recherche Porcine en France 32: 403–411Google Scholar
Lebret, B, Dourmad, JY, Mourot, J, Pollet, PY and Gondret, F 2014 Production performance, carcass composition, and adi-pose tissue traits of heavy pigs: influence of breed and production system. Journal of Animal Science 92: 3543–3556. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-7398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebret, B, Ecolan, P, Bonhomme, N, Méteau, K and Prunier, A 2015 Influence of production system in local and conventional pig breeds on stress indicators at slaughter, muscle and meat traits and pork eating quality. Animal 9: 1404–1413. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115000609CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lebret, B, Meunier-Salaün, MC, Foury, A, Mormède, P, Dransfield, E and Dourmad, JY 2006 Influence of rearing con-ditions on performance, behavioral, and physiological responses of pigs to preslaughter handling, carcass traits, and meat quality. Journal of Animal Science 84: 2436–2447. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebret, B, Prunier, A, Bonhomme, N, Foury, A, Mormède, P and Dourmad, JY 2011 Physiological traits and meat quality of pigs as affected by genotype and housing system. Meat Science 88:14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.11.025CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Y, Yang, X, Jing, X, He, X, Wang, L, Liu, Y and Liu, D 2017 Transcriptomics analysis on excellent meat quality traits of skeletal muscles of the Chinese indigenous min pig compared with the large white breed. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19:21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010021CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez-Bote, CJ 1998 Sustained utilization of the Iberian pig breed. Meat Science 49: S17–S27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00072-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loponte, R, Secci, G, Mancini, S, Bovera, F, Panettieri, V, Nizza, A and Parisi, G 2018 Effect of the housing system (free-range vs open air cages) on growth performance, carcass and meat quality and antioxidant capacity of rabbits. Meat Science 145:137–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.06.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merlot, E, Vincent, A, Thomas, F, Meunier-Salaün, MC, Damon, M, Robert, F, Dourmad, JY, Lebret, B and Prunier, A 2012 Health and immune traits of Basque and Large White pigs housed in a conventional or enriched environment. Animal 6:1290–1299. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112000080CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pugliese, C, Bozzi, R, Campodoni, G, Acciaioli, A, Franci, O and Gandini, G 2005 Performance of Cinta Senese pigs reared outdoors and indoors 1. Meat and subcutaneous fat characteris-tics. Meat Science 69: 459–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raes, K, Smet, SD and Demeyer, D 2004 Effect of dietary fatty acids on incorporation of long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acid in lamb, beef and pork meat: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 113: 199–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2003.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, M, Jongman, EC, Butler, KL and Hemsworth, PH 2016 Relationships between temperament, feeding behaviour, social interactions, and stress in lambs adapting to a feedlot environ-ment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 183: 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.07.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smet, SD, Raes, K and Demeyer, D 2004 Meat fatty acid compo-sition as affected by fatness and genetic factors: a review. Animal Research 53: 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2004003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teixeira, DL, Miranda-de la Lama, GC, Villarroel, M, Garcia-Belenguer, S, Sañudo, C and Maria, GA 2012 Effect of straw on lamb welfare, production performance and meat quality during the finishing phase of fattening. Meat Science 92: 829–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.07.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terlouw, C, Berne, A and Astruc, T 2009 Effect of rearing and slaughter conditions on behaviour, physiology and meat quality of Large White and Duroc-sired pigs. Livestock Science 122: 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2008.08.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Weerd, HA and Day, JEL 2009 A review of environ-mental enrichment for pigs housed in intensive housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 116: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Weerd, HA, Docking, CM, Day, JEL, Avery, PJ and Edwards, SA 2003 A systematic approach towards developing environmental enrichment for pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 84: 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00150-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Weerd, HA, Docking, CM, Day, JEL and Edwards, SA 2005 The development of harmful social behaviour in pigs with intact tails and different enrichment backgrounds in two housing systems. Animal Science 80: 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1079/ASC40450289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vas, J, Chojnacki, R, Kjøren, MF, Lyngwa, C and Andersen, IL 2013 Social interactions, cortisol and repro-ductive success of domestic goats (Capra hircus) subjected to different animal densities during pregnancy. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 147: 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2013.04.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, XB, Wang, YB and Zhang, BR 2002 Comparison of reproduction performance in Minpig sows and Minpig hybrid sows Heilongjiang. Journal of Animal Science 1: 12–14Google Scholar
Wood, JD, Enser, M, Fisher, AV, Nute, GR, Sheard, PR, Richardson, RI, Hughes, SI and Whittington, FM 2008 Fat deposition, fatty acid composition and meat quality: A review. Meat Science 78: 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.019CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, JD, Nute, GR, Richardson, RI, Whittington, FM, Southwood, O, Plastow, G, Mansbridge, R, Da, CN and Chang, KC 2004 Effects of breed, diet and muscle on fat deposition and eating quality in pigs. Meat Science 67: 651–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.01.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, JD, Richardson, RI, Nute, GR, Fisher, AV, Campo, MM, Kasapidou, E, Sheard, PR and Enser, M 2003 Effects of fatty acids on meat quality: a review. Meat Science 66: 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00022-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar