Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:07:55.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Post-Release Survival of Hand-Reared Tawny Owls (Strix Aluco)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

J A Bennett  and
A D Routh
J A Bennett
Affiliation:
RSPCA Stapeley Grange Wildlife Hospital, London Road, Stapeley, Nantwich, Cheshire, CW5 7JW, UK
A D Routh*
Affiliation:
RSPCA Stapeley Grange Wildlife Hospital, London Road, Stapeley, Nantwich, Cheshire, CW5 7JW, UK
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints at: 24 Bridge Street, Wybunbury, Nantwich, Cheshire CW5 7NE, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The post-release survival of hand-reared tawny owls, Strix aluco, was studied. Hand-rearing did not appear to affect the birds’ instinctive behaviour or post-release survival. The recovery of several pellets confirmed that hunting in this species is an innate process. In terms of animal welfare, hand-reared tawny owls do not appear to be at a disadvantage when compared with wild juveniles, indicating that current rearing and release practices are effective.

Keywords

animal welfarehand-rearedinstinctsjuvenilesurvivaltawny owls
Type
Short Communication
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , August 2000 , pp. 317 - 321
Copyright
© 2000 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Agostini, N 1994 A note on the predatory behaviour of rehabilitating wild barn owls (Tyto alba) and tawny owls (Strix aluco). Bird Behaviour 10: 41–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, C F and Petty, S J 1997 Dispersal behaviour and survival of juvenile tawny owls (Strix aluco) during the low point in a vole cycle. In: Duncan J R, Johnson D H and Nicholls T H (eds) Biology and Conservation of Owls of the Northern Hemisphere. General Technical Report NC-190 pp 111-118. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, St Paul, Minnesota, USAGoogle Scholar
Kenward, R 1987 Wildlife Radio Tagging pp 33–39. Academic Press: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Mead, C 1987 Owls. Whittet Books: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Redpath, S M 1995 Habitat fragmentation and the individual: tawny owls (Strix aluco) in woodland patches. Journal of Animal Ecology 64: 652–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southern, H N 1970 The natural control of a population of tawny owls (Strix aluco). Journal of Zoology 162: 197–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar