Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:15:33.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The risk factors affecting the development of vent pecking and cannibalism in free-range and organic laying hens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

SL Lambton ,
TG Knowles ,
C Yorke  and
CJ Nicol
SL Lambton*
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK
TG Knowles
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK
C Yorke
Affiliation:
Stonegate Farmers, The Old Sidings, Lacock, Chippenham, Wiltshire, UK
CJ Nicol
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: sarah.lambton@bristol.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Injurious pecking remains one of the biggest animal welfare and economic challenges for free-range egg producers. This prospective epidemiological study investigated the development of vent pecking (VP) and cannibalism on 62 free-range and organic UK farms (119 flocks). Flocks were visited at 25 (± 5) and 40 (± 5) weeks of age. Rates of VP were recorded and farmers were asked whether they had observed cannibalism in their flocks. Environmental and management data were collected for each flock. Risk factors associated with these behaviours were modelled using MLwiN. VP was observed in 19.5 and 29.9% of flocks, at mean rates of 0.35 and 0.21 bouts per bird per h, at 25 and 40 weeks, respectively. Cannibalism was reported at 22.6% of visits. The odds of flocks showing VP or cannibalism increased with rate of severe feather pecking (SFP). VP was more likely to be observed in laying houses with more and/or longer pop holes and where feed was scattered on the floor. Providing more aerial perch length, or perches > 0.5 m in height, was associated with increased risk of VP. When SFP was excluded from the model, likelihood of VP was higher in flocks fed pelleted feed. All of these may provide a useful basis from which to derive management strategies to reduce the risk of VP and thus improve the welfare of laying hens. However, it is important to remember that this study does not elucidate the causal relationships between these variables, and further work is needed to understand the mechanism behind these associations.

Keywords

animal welfarecannibalismfree rangelaying hensrisk factorsvent pecking
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , February 2015 , pp. 101 - 111
Copyright
© 2015 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Aerni, V, El-Lethey, H and Wechsler, B 2000 Effect of foraging material and food form on feather pecking in laying hens. British Poultry Science 41: 16–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071660086349CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, J and Perry, GC 1975 Feather pecking and cannibalism in a caged layer flock. British Poultry Science 16: 441–451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071667508416212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrosen, T and Petersen, VE 1997 The influence of protein level in the diet on cannibalism and quality of plumage of layers. Poultry Science 76: 559–563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.4.559CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bearse, GE, Miller, VL and McClary, CF 1939 The cannibalism preventing properties of the fibre fraction of oat hulls. Poultry Science18: 210-214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bestman, MWP and Wagenaar, JP 2003 Farm level factors associated with feather pecking in organic laying hens. Livestock Production Science 80: 133–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00314-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilčík, B and Keeling, LJ 1999 Changes in feather condition in relation to feather pecking and aggressive behaviour in laying hens. British Poultry Science 40: 444–451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071669987188CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bilčík, B and Keeling, LJ 2000 Relationship between feather pecking and ground pecking in laying hens and the effect of group size. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 68: 55–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00089-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blokhuis, HJ and van der Haar, JW 1989 Effects of floor type during rearing and of beak trimming on ground pecking and feath-er pecking in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 22: 359–369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(89)90030-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bright, A, Jones, TA and Dawkins, MS 2006 A non-intrusive method of assessing plumage condition in commercial flocks of laying hens. Animal Welfare 15: 113–118Google Scholar
Cloutier, S, Newberry, RC, Forster, CT and Girsberger, KM 2000 Does pecking at inanimate stimuli predict cannibalistic behaviour in domestic fowl? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 66:119–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00068-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defra 2010 Ministerial Statement. http://www.publications.parlia-ment.uk/pa/cm201011/cmhansrd/cm101108/wmstext/101108m0001.htm#1011083000067Google Scholar
Defra 2014 United Kingdom Egg Statistics. https://www.gov.uk/gov-ernment/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/277409/eg gs-statsnotice-06feb14.pdfGoogle Scholar
El-Lethey, H, Aerni, V, Jungi, TW and Wechsler, B 2000 Stress and feather pecking in laying hens in relation to housing conditions. British Poultry Science 41: 22–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071660086358CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elwinger, K, Tauson, R, Tufvesson, M and Hartmann, C 2002 Feeding of layers kept in an organic feed environment. Proceedings of the 11th European Poultry Conference. 6-10 September 2002, Bremen, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, M, Waldenstedt, L, Elwinger, K, Engstrom, B and Fossum, O 2010 Behaviour, production and health of organically reared fast-growing broilers fed low crude protein diets including different amino acid contents at start. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A, Animal Science 60: 112–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09064702.2010.502243Google Scholar
Gilani, A-M 2012 Investigation of rearing environment and its associ-ation with feather pecking in free range pullets. PhD Thesis, University of Bristol, UKGoogle Scholar
Green, LE, Lewis, K, Kimpton, A and Nicol, CJ 2000 Cross-sectional study of the prevalence of feather pecking in laying hens in alter-native systems and its associations with management and disease. Veterinary Record 147: 233–238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.147.9.233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnarsson, S, Keeling, LJ and Svedberg, J 1999 Effect of rearing factors on the prevalence of floor eggs, cloacal cannibal-ism and feather pecking in commercial flocks of loose housed laying hens. British Poultry Science 40: 12–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071669987773CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartini, S, Choct, M, Hinch, G, Kocher, A and Nolan, JV 2002 Effects of light intensity during rearing and beak trimming and dietary fiber sources on mortality, egg production, and perform-ance of ISA brown laying hens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 11: 104–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/japr/11.1.104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber-Eicher, B and Wechsler, B 1998 The effect of quality and availability of foraging materials on feather pecking in laying hen chicks. Animal Behaviour55: 861-873. http://dx.doi.org/10.1 006/anbe.1997.0715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnsen, PF, Vestergaard, KS and Norgaard-Nielsen, G 1998 Influence of early rearing conditions on the development of feather pecking and cannibalism in domestic fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 60: 25–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00149-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, A, Tauson, R, and Abrahamsson, P 1997 Feather pecking and cannibalism in non beak trimmed layers subjected to salt deficiency - effects of diet, hybrid and housing system. In: Koene, P and Blokhuis, H (eds) Proceedings of the 5th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare. 5-10 June 1997, Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Kawai, M, Umeda, I, Sakurai, S and Makashima, Y 1987 Observations on cannibalism induced by prolapse and its inci-dence in two commercial layer strains. Japanese Poultry Science 24:316–319. http://dx.doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.24.316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjaer, JB and Vestergaard, KS 1999 Development of feather pecking in relation to light intensity. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 62: 243–254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00217-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koene, P 1997 Cannibalism in extensive poultry keeping in the Netherlands: an inventory. In: Koene, P and Blokhuis, H (eds) Proceedings of the 5th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare. 5-10 June 1997, Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Lambton, SL, Knowles, TG, Yorke, C and Nicol, CJ 2010 The risk factors affecting the development of gentle and severe feather pecking in loose housed laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 123: 32–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.12.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambton, SL, Nicol, CJ, Friel, M, Main, DCJ, McKinstry, JL, Sherwin, CM, Walton, J and Weeks, CA 2013 A bespoke management package can reduce levels of injurious pecking in loose-housed laying hen flocks. Veterinary Record 172: 423–430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.101067CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAdie, TM and Keeling, LJ 2000 Effect of manipulating feath-ers of laying hens on the incidence of feather pecking and canni-balism. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 68: 215–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00107-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, CJ, Bestman, M, Gilani, A-M, de Haas, EN, de Jong, IC, Lambton, SL, Wagenaar, JP, Weeks, CA and Rodenburg, TB 2013 The prevention and control of feather pecking: application to commercial systems. World's Poultry Science Journal 69:775–788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0043933913000809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, CJ, Gregory, NG, Knowles, TG, Parkman, ID and Wilkins, LJ 1999 Differential effects of increased stocking densi-ty, mediated by increased flock size, on feather pecking and aggression in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 65: 137–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00057-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pötzsch, CJ, Lewis, K, Nicol, CJ and Green, LE 2001 A cross-sectional study of the prevalence of vent pecking in laying hens in alternative systems and its associations with feather pecking, man-agement and disease. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 74: 259–272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00167-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasbash, J, Steele, F, Browne, W and Prosser, B 2004 A User's Guide to MLwiN. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol: UKGoogle Scholar
Riber, AB, Wichman, A, Braastad, BO and Forkman, B 2007 Effects of broody hens on perch use, ground pecking, feather pecking and cannibalism in domestic fowl (Gallus gallus domesticus). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 106: 39–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.07.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodenburg, TB, van Krimpen, MM, de Jong, IC, de Haas, EN, Kops, MS, Riedstra, BJ, Nordquist, RE, Wagenaar, JP, Bestman, M and Nicol, CJ 2013 The prevention and control of feather pecking in laying hens: identifying the underlying principles. World's Poultry Science Journal 69: 361–374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0043933913000354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savory, CJ 1995 Feather pecking and cannibalism. Worlds Poultry Science Journal 51: 215–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/WPS19950016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savory, CJ, Mann, JS and Macleod, MG 1999 Incidence of pecking damage in growing bantams in relation to food form, group size, stocking density, dietary tryptophan concentration and dietary protein source. British Poultry Science 40: 579–584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071669986936CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaible, PJ, Davidson, JA and Bandemer, SL 1947 Cannibalism and feather pecking in chicks as influenced by certain changes in specific ration. Poultry Science 26: 651–656.http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0260651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenfeldt, S, Kjaer, JB and Engberg, RM 2007 Effect of feeding silages or carrots as supplements to laying hens on production performance, nutrient digestibility, gut structure, gut microflora and feather pecking behaviour. British Poultry Science 48: 454–468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071660701473857CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Krimpen, MM, Kwakkel, RP, Reuvekamp, BFJ, Van der Peet-Schwering, CMC, Den Hartog, LA and Verstegen, MWA 2005 Impact of feeding management on feather pecking in laying hens. Worlds Poultry Science Journal61: 663-685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/WPS200478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, B and Huber-Eicher, B 1998 The effect of foraging material and perch height on feather pecking and feather damage in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 58: 131–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00137-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yngvesson, J and Keeling, LJ 1998 Are cannibalistic laying hens more attracted to blood in a test situation than other hens? Proceedings of the 32nd Congress of the ISAE. 21-25 July 1998, Clermont-Ferrand, FranceGoogle Scholar
Yngvesson, J, Keeling, LJ and Newberry, RC 2004 Individual production differences do not explain cannibalistic behaviour in laying hens. British Poultry Science 45: 453–462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071660412331286163CrossRefGoogle Scholar