Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:44:50.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Catullus’ Priapean Poem (c. 17)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2022

Lindsay Watson
Lindsay Watson*
Affiliation:
University of Sydney Email: lindsay.watson@sydney.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Catullus 17 poses a host of interpretational difficulties. The thorniest of these concerns its unity. How can the initial lines on the rickety state of Colonia's ponticulus be reconciled with the real focus of the poem, the precipitation from the bridge of a husband who is blind to his bride's erotic needs, in the hope of bringing him to his senses? Many attempts have been made to resolve the problem, but few persuade to any degree. This paper proposes that the key to the unity-question lies in Catullus’ adoption of the rare priapean metre. This manoeuvre expresses itself in two ways: first, by infusing the poem as a whole with the thematic colours ascribed to priapeans by ancient metricians, that is to say a ludic, countrified but also mock-epic ethos: second, and crucially, by constructing the doltish maritus, the thematic locus of the poem, as an alter ego of the eponymous deity of Priapean literature; for just like the god of that corpus, the husband of the poem is a conspicuous sexual under-achiever, the butt of mocking laughter, inurbane, and little more than an insensate block of wood. In sum, by reading c. 17 through a specifically Priapean lens it is possible to discover in it an otherwise elusive unity.

Keywords

BridgeunityPriapean metrePriapussexual failurerisibilityrusticitywood
Type
Research Article
Information
Antichthon , Volume 55 , 2021 , pp. 35 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Australasian Society for Classical Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J. N. (1982), The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. London.Google Scholar
Birt, Th. (1926), ‘Pontifex und sexagenarii de ponte (zu Catull. c. 17)’, Rh. Mus. 75, 115–26.Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. (1960), ‘Feigensymbolik im antiken Epigramm’, Rh. Mus. 103, 200–29.Google Scholar
Bulloch, A. W. (ed.) (1985), Callimachus. The Fifth Hymn. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Butrica, J. (2000), review of R.W. Hooper The Priapus Poems (Urbana and Chicago, IL, 1999), BMCRev: 00.02.33.Google Scholar
Callebat, L. (ed.) (2017), Priapées, 2nd edn. Paris.Google Scholar
Carratello, U. (1983), ‘Il c. 17 di Catullo’, GIF 14, 25–51.Google Scholar
Cèbe, J.-P. and Veyne, P. (1969), ‘Remarques sur le poème 17 de Catulle’, in Bibauw, J. (ed.), Hommages à Marcel Renard I. Brussels, 238–49.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. R. (2007), Looking at Laughter. Humor, Power and Transgression in Roman Visual Culture 100B.C.–A.D.250. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consbruch, M. (ed.) (1906), Hephaestion Enchiridion. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. (2013), ‘Boring Ipsitilla: Bilingual Wordplay in Catullus 32’, MH 70, 190–8.Google Scholar
De Gubernatis, Lenchantin M. (ed.) (1976), Il libro di Catullo. Introduzione Testo e Commento. Torino.Google Scholar
Deuling, J. (2006), ‘Catullus 17, 67 and the Catullan Context’, Antichthon 40, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (ed.) (1889), A Commentary on Catullus. 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. (1995), Catullan Provocations. Lyric Poetry and the Drama of Position. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordyce, C. J. (ed.) (1961), Catullus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1961), ‘Two Poems of Catullus’ [Poems 8 & 42]’, JRS 51, 46–53.Google Scholar
Frazel, T. (2003), ‘Priapus's Two Rapes in Ovid's Fasti’, Arethusa 36, 61–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, G. (ed.) (1908), Catulli Veronensis Liber. Leipzig-Berlin.Google Scholar
Godwin, J. (ed.) (1999), Catullus: The Shorter Poems. Warminster.Google Scholar
Goldberg, C. (1992), Carmina Priapea. Einleitung, Übersetzung, Interpretation und Kommentar. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Griffith, D. (2018), ‘The Clueless Cuckold and the She-Mule's Shoe (Catullus 17, 23–6)’, Paideia 73, 93–101 (non uidi).Google Scholar
Grewing, F. (1997), Martial, Buch VI. (Ein Kommentar). Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallett, J. P. (1981), ‘Pepedi / diffisa nate ficus. Priapic Revenge in Horace Satires 1.8’, Rh. Mus. 124, 341–7.Google Scholar
Heine, R. (1967), ‘Zum 2. und 17. Gedicht Catulls’, Gymnasium 74, 315–21.Google Scholar
Herter, H. (1932), De Priapo. Giessen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herter, H. (1954), ‘Priapos’, RE 22.1914–42.Google Scholar
Herter, H. (1961), ‘Das unschuldige Kind’, JBAC 4, 146–61.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. (2005), ‘Impotence? It Happened to the Best of Them! A Linear Reading of the Corpus Priapeorum’, Hermes 133, 368–81.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1996), ‘The Language of Catullus 17 and that of its Immediate Neighbours in the Transmitted Collection’, Sileno 22, 137–63.Google Scholar
Keil, H. (ed.) (1857–1880), Grammatici Latini. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Khan, H. Akbar. (1969), ‘Image and Symbol in Catullus 17’, CPhil. 64, 88–97.Google Scholar
Kloss, G. (1998), ‘Catulls Brückengedicht (c. 17)’, Hermes 126, 58–79.Google Scholar
Kroll, W. (ed.) (1968), C. Valerius Catullus. 5th ed. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. (2001), Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance. Chicago, IL/London.Google Scholar
Lachmann, K. (ed.) (1829), Q. Valerii Catulli Veronensis Liber. Berlin.Google Scholar
Manson, M. (1978), ‘Puer bimulus (Catulle 17.12–13) et l'image du petit enfant chez Catulle et ses prédécesseurs’, MÉFRA 90, 247–91.Google Scholar
Mattiacci, S. (2007), ‘Marziale e la fortuna del neoterismo nella prima età imperiale’, in S. Mattiacci and A. Perruccio, Anti-Mitologia ed eredità neoterica in Marziale. Pisa, 137–218.Google Scholar
McKeown, J. C. (1987), Ovid Amores, vol II: A Commentary on Book One. Leeds.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. (2010), Musa Pedestris. Metre and Meaning in Roman Verse. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muretus, M.-A. (ed.) (1554), Catullus et in eum commentarius M. Antonii Mureti. Venice.Google Scholar
Murgatroyd, P. (2002), ‘The Rape Attempts on Lotis and Vesta’, CQ 52, 622–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B. (ed.) (1958), C. Valerii Catulli Carmina. Oxford.Google Scholar
O'Connor, E. M. (1989), Symbolum Salacitatis. A Study of the God Priapus as a Literary Character. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Opelt, I. (1965), Die lateinischen Schimpfwörter und verwandte sprachliche Erscheinungen. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Otto, A. (1890), Die Sprichwörter und sprichwörtlichen Redensarten der Römer. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Parker, W. H. (1988), Priapea: Poems for a Phallic God. Beckenham, Kent/North Ryde, NSW.Google Scholar
Paule, M. T. (2017), Canidia, Rome's First Witch. London/NY.Google Scholar
Pease, A. S. (ed.) (1955), M. Tulli Ciceronis De Natura Deorum. Harvard.Google Scholar
Powell, J. U. (ed.) (1925), Collectanea Alexandrina. Oxford.Google Scholar
Quinn, K. (1969), ‘Practical Criticism’, G&R 16, 19–29.Google Scholar
Quinn, K. (ed.) (1970), Catullus: The Poems. London.Google Scholar
Rankin, H. D. (1968), ‘A Note on Catullus 17’, Latomus 27, 418–20.Google Scholar
Ronconi, A. (1971), Studi catulliani. Brescia.Google Scholar
Rostagni, L. (1970), ‘Sul primo Catullo’, in Forschungen zur römischen Literatur. Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Karl Büchner. Wiesbaden, 2–9.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. (1959), ‘Colonia and Her Bridge: A Note on the Structure of Catullus 17’, TAPA 90, 238–42.Google Scholar
Rutter, J. (1967), ‘A Further Note on Catullus 17’, CW 60, 269–70.Google Scholar
Seagraves, R. (1979), ‘The municeps in Catullus 17’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History I. Brussels, 209–13.Google Scholar
Stewart, P. (1997), ‘Fine Art and Coarse Art: The Image of Roman Priapus’, Art History 20, 575–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syndikus, H. P. (ed.) (1984), Catull. Eine Interpretation. Erster Teil. Die kleinen Gedichte (1–60). Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. F. S. (ed.) (1997), Catullus. Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tränkle, H. (ed.) (1990), Appendix Tibulliana. Berlin/New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uden, J. (2007), ‘Impersonating Priapus’, AJPhil. 128, 1–26.Google Scholar
Uden, J. (2010), ‘The Vanishing Gardens of Priapus’, Harv. Stud. 105, 189–219.Google Scholar
Walsh, P. G. (1985), ‘Catullus 17 and the Priapean’, in Arctos Supplementum 2, Studia in honorem Iiro Kajanto. Helsinki, 315–22.Google Scholar
Wortmann, D. (1967), ‘Ein phallisches Priap-Rhyton aus Neuss’, BJ 167, 280–4.Google Scholar
Wray, D. (2001), Catullus and the Poetics of Roman Manhood. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarker, J. W. (1969), ‘Mule, nihil sentis? (Catullus 83 and 17)’, CJ 64, 172–7.Google Scholar