Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T06:44:30.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Meno and the Slave

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2022

A. R. Nathan
A. R. Nathan*
Affiliation:
The University of Sydney
*
Email: aidan.nathan@sydney.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper argues that the slave demonstration in Plato's Meno contains a carefully-wrought analogy of Meno's dialectic which can guide our understanding of the dialogue. This analogy exposes and diagnoses Meno's failings as a student who is unwilling to engage in the learning process but simply wants to be spoon-fed information. This, in turn, reveals the way Plato wants us to interact with his text: insofar as the author makes his point implicitly and allusively, we are aptly required to puzzle our way through the text to unravel the meaning. We must actively engage with the text. The Meno, thus, exemplifies its own didactic message. In this way, I hope to offer a meaningful interpretation of a significant passage in Plato as well as provide a case study of how he can marshal the literary resources at his disposal towards his philosophical ends.

Keywords

slave demonstrationlearningliterary techniquesanalogyMeno
Type
Research Article
Information
Antichthon , Volume 56 , 2022 , pp. 58 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Australasian Society for Classical Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkins, A. W. H. (1973), ‘ἀρɛτή, τέχνη, Democracy and Sophists: Protagoras 316b–238d’, JHS 93, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, F. A. G. (1964), Greek Education. London.Google Scholar
Bedu-Addo, J. T (1983), ‘Sense-Experience and Recollection in Plato's Meno’, AJPh 104, 228–48.Google Scholar
Bedu-Addo, J. T (1984), ‘Recollection and the Argument “From a Hypothesis” in Plato's Meno’, JHS 104, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benitez, R. (2016), ‘Boy! What Boy? (A Plea for Meno's Slave)’, AncPhil 36, 107–14.Google Scholar
Benson, H. H. (1990), ‘Meno, the Slave-Boy and the Elenchus’, Phronesis 35, 128–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bluck, R. (ed.) (1961), Plato's Meno. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Boter, G. G. (1988), ‘Plato: Meno 82c2–3’, Phronesis 33, 208–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. S. (1967), ‘Plato Disapproves of the Slave-Boy's Answer’, RMeta 21.1, 57–93.Google Scholar
Day, J. M. (ed.) (1994), Plato's Meno in Focus. London.Google Scholar
Devereux, D. T. (1978), ‘Nature and Teaching in Plato's Meno’, Phronesis 23, 118–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, T. (1973), ‘Plato's Theory of Recollection Reconsidered: An Interpretation of Meno 80a–86c’, Man and World 6.2, 163–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, T. (2007), ‘“The Theory of Recollection in Plato's Meno:” Against a Common Myth of Platonic Scholarship’, in Erler, M. and Brisson, L. (eds.), Gorgias–Menon: Selected Papers from the Seventh Symposium Platonicum. Sankt Augustin, 184–98.Google Scholar
Eckstein, J. (1968), The Platonic Method: An Interpretation of the Dramatic-Philosophic Aspects of the Meno. New York.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (2003), ‘Inquiry in the Meno’, in Fine, G., Plato on Knowledge and Forms: Selected Essays. Oxford, 44–65.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. H. (1990), ‘Yet More on Meno 82a–85d’, Phronesis 35, 175–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, L. (2001), ‘The Structure of Dialectic in the Meno’, Phronesis 46, 413–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, F. (1998), ‘Nonpropositional Knowledge in Plato’, Apeiron 31, 235–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ionescu, C. (2007) Plato's Meno: An Interpretation. Lanham.Google Scholar
Klein, J. (1989), A Commentary on Plato's Meno. Chicago.Google Scholar
Lane, M. S. (1998) Method and Politics in Plato's Statesman. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, J. P. (1977), ‘Protagoras… or Plato? II. The Protagoras’, Phronesis 22, 103–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marrou, H. I. (1956), A History of Education in Antiquity. Trans. Lamb, G.. London.Google Scholar
Miller, M. (2004), The Philosopher in Plato's Statesman. Las Vegas.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, J. (1994), ‘Learning as Recollecting’, in Day (1994), 112–28.Google Scholar
Mueller, I. (1992), ‘Mathematical Method and Philosophical Truth’, in Kraut, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Cambridge, 170–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, A. R. (2017), ‘Protagoras’ Great Speech’, CQ 67, 380–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nehamas, A. (1994), ‘Meno's Paradox and Socrates as a Teacher’, in Day (1994), 221–48.Google Scholar
Pender, E. (2003), ‘Plato on Metaphors and Models’, in Boys-Stones, G. (ed.), Metaphor, Allegory and the Classical Tradition: Ancient Thought and Modern Revisions. Oxford, 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, P. (1995), Plato's Philosophy of Mathematics. Sankt Augustin.Google Scholar
Scott, D. (2006), Plato's Meno. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharples, R. (ed.) (1985), Plato: Meno. Warminster.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. (1989), ‘More on Plato, Meno 82c2–3’, Phronesis 34, 220–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szaif, J. (2018), ‘Socrates and the Benefits of Puzzlement’, in Karamanolis, G. and Politis, V. (eds.), The Aporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy. Cambridge, 29–47.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. (2005), Recollecting Plato's Meno. London.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1988), ‘Mathematics and Elenchus: A Turning-Point in Plato's Philosophical Development’, AJPh 109, 362–96.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1994), ‘Anamnesis in the Meno’, in Day (1994), 88–111.Google Scholar
Weiss, R. (2001), Virtue in the Cave: Moral Inquiry in Plato's Meno. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkes, K. V. (1994), ‘Conclusions in the Meno’, in Day (1994), 208–20.Google Scholar
Wolfsdorf, D. (2008), Trials of Reason: Plato and the Crafting of Philosophy. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar