Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T10:11:08.958Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Physical Parameters of Athenian Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2019

David M. Pritchard*
Affiliation:
L'Institut d’études avancées de l'université de Lyon The University of Queenslandd.pritchard@uq.edu.au

Abstract

This article investigates the physical parameters of Athenian democracy. It explores the collective-action problems that these parameters caused and settles debates about them that R. G. Osborne famously provoked. Classical Athens was ten times larger than an average Greek state. Fourth-century Athenians were ten times more numerous. These parameters significantly contributed to the success of Athenian democracy. Athens could field more combatants than almost every other Greek state. With such huge manpower reserves individual Athenians had to fight only every few years. Nevertheless, this huge population also caused collective-action problems. Attica's farmers could not grow enough to feed them. The Athenians never had adequate personnel nor recordkeeping centrally to administer so many citizens over such a large territory. Yet they found effective means at home and abroad to overcome these collective-action problems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Australasian Society for Classical Studies 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Busolt, G. and Swoboda, H., Griechische Staatskunde (Munich 1926) 758Google Scholar.

2 E.g. Ar. Eccl. 277–81; Sinclair, R.K., Participation and Democracy in Athens (Cambridge 1988) 119–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 See section 8 below.

4 E.g. Mills, S., Theseus, Tragedy and the Athenian Empire (Oxford 1997) 6162Google Scholar; Parker, R., Athenian Religion: A History (Oxford 1996) 99, 143Google Scholar.

5 Garnsey, P., ‘Grain for Athens’, in Cartledge, P.A. and Harvey, F.D. (eds.), Crux: Essays Presented to G. E. M. de Ste. Croix on His 75th Birthday (London 1985) 6275Google Scholar, at 69–70.

6 Osborne, R.G., Demos: The Discovery of Classical Attika (Cambridge 1985) 93110Google Scholar.

7 E.g. Dem. 1.5; Osborne (n. 6) 111–26.

8 Davis, G., ‘Mining Money in Late Archaic Athens’, Historia 63 (2014) 257–77Google Scholar.

9 Flament, C., Une économie monétarisée: Athènes à l’époque classique (440-338): Contribution à l’étude du phénomène monétaire en Grèce ancienne (Louvain 2007) 297–98Google Scholar.

10 Stroud, R.S., ‘An Athenian Law on Silver Coinage’, Hesperia 43 (1974) 157–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 166–72, 185–87.

11 Garnsey, P., Famine and Food Supply in the Graeco-Roman World (Cambridge 1988) 9193CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Garnsey (n. 5) 73.

13 E.g. Theophr. Hist. Pl. 8.8.2; Garnsey (n. 11) 102–4.

14 Garnsey (n. 11) 104.

15 Akrigg, B., ‘Demography and Classical Athens’, in Holleran, C. and Pudsey, A. (eds.), Demography and the Graeco-Roman World (Cambridge 2011) 3759CrossRefGoogle Scholar furnishes a valuable assessment of Hansen's demographic work.

16 Hansen, M.H., Demography and Democracy: The Number of Athenian Citizens in the Fourth Century BC (Herning 1986)Google Scholar.

17 Hansen, M.H., Three Studies in Athenian Demography (Copenhagen 1988) 2628Google Scholar.

18 Hansen, M.H., The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes: Structure, Principles and Ideology, trans. Crook, J.A. (Cambridge [Massachusetts] and Oxford 1991) 55Google Scholar; cf. Akrigg (n. 15) 58–59.

19 Brulé, P., ‘Enquête démographique sur la famille grecque antique: Étude de listes de politographie d'Asie mineure d’époque hellénistique (Milet et Ilion)’, in Pébarthe, C. and Devillers, O. (eds.), Histoire de familles dans le monde grec ancien et dans la Rome antique (Bordeaux 2018) 6788Google Scholar.

20 Akrigg (n. 15) 42.

21 E.g. Whitehead, D., The Ideology of the Athenian Metic (Cambridge 1977) 9798Google Scholar.

22 Akrigg (n. 15) 44; Fisher, N.R.E., Slavery in Classical Greece (London 1993) 35, 42Google Scholar; Kamen, D., Status in Classical Athens (Princeton 2013) 9Google Scholar.

23 Pritchard, D.M., Athenian Democracy at War (Cambridge 2019) 3643Google Scholar.

24 E.g. Ar. Eccl. 593; Arist. Pol. 1323a5–7; Hdt. 6.137; Lys. 24.6; Roubineau, J.-M., Les cités grecques (VIe-IIe siècle av. J.-C.): Essai d'histoire sociale (Paris 2015) 102–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 E.g. Dem. 27.9, 18; 41.8; cf. Xen. Vect. 4.23; Pritchard, D.M., Public Spending and Democracy in Classical Athens (Austin 2015) 8485Google Scholar.

26 For this pay-rate see e.g. Loomis, W.T., Wages, Welfare Costs and Inflation in Classical Athens (Ann Arbor 1998) 3261Google Scholar, 104–20.

27 This figure sits just below Fisher and Kamen's estimate of the slave population at between 15 and 35 percent of Attica's total population (Fisher [n. 22] 35; Kamen [n. 22] 9).

28 Pritchard, D.M., ‘The Symbiosis between Democracy and War: The Case of Ancient Athens’, in Pritchard, D.M. (ed.), War, Democracy and Culture in Classical Athens (Cambridge 2010) 162Google Scholar, at 22.

29 de Sainte Croix, G.E.M., The Origins of the Peloponnesian War (London 1972) 4549Google Scholar.

30 De Sainte Croix (n. 29) 49.

31 E.g. [Arist.] Ath. Pol. 43.4; Moreno, A., Feeding the Democracy: The Athenian Grain Supply in the Fifth and Fourth Centuries BC (Oxford 2007) 211–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Xen. Hell. 4.8.27–30; Pritchard, D. M., ‘Public Finance and War in Ancient Greece’, G&R 62 (2015) 4859Google Scholar, at 55–56.

33 Pritchard (n. 32) 56–58.

34 E.g. Dem. 20.29–41; Isoc. 17.57; IG ii2 212; Engen, D.T., Honour and Profit: Athenian Trade Policy and the Economy and Society of Greece (Ann Arbor 2011)Google Scholar.

35 E.g. [Arist.] Ath. Pol. 51.3; Dem. 34.37; 35.51; RO 26.

36 On the relative size of Attica's population see e.g. Hansen, M.H. and Nielsen, T.H., An Inventory of Archaic and Classical Poleis (Oxford 2004) 7073Google Scholar.

37 E.g. Aesch. Sept. 10–20, 415–16; Ar. Vesp. 1117–20; Lys. 16.17; Thuc. 1.144.4; 2.41.5; 2.43.1; Pritchard (n. 28) 6.

38 E.g. Lys. 9.4, 15; Pritchard (n. 23) 47, 101–2, 106–7.

39 E.g. [Arist.] Ath. Pol. 21.4-5; Pritchard, D.M., ‘Kleisthenes and Athenian Democracy: Vision from Above or Below?’, Polis 22 (2005) 136–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 137–40.

40 Arist. Poet. 1448a35–7; Hansen and Nielsen (n. 36) 626.

41 Whitehead, D., The Demes of Attica 508/7–ca. 250 BC: A Political and Social Study (Princeton 1986) 6975CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42 The demotics of Athenians or their abbreviations were always included on Attic inscriptions; for these abbreviations see especially Whitehead, D., ‘Abbreviated Athenian Demotics’, ZPE 81 (1990) 106–61Google Scholar.

43 E.g. [Arist.] Ath. Pol. 21.4; Hansen (n. 18) 34–36, 101–6.

44 Whitehead (n. 41) xxiii: map.

45 Pritchard (n. 28) 9, 15–16. On the military purposes of his reforms see e.g. Pritchard (n. 23) 34–5.

46 For tribes as the hoplite army's units see e.g. Hdt. 6.111.1; Thuc. 6.101.5; Xen. Hell. 4.2.19, 21; Pritchard (n. 23) 34–35.

47 E.g. [Arist.] Ath. Pol. 21.1–4; Arist. Pol. 1275b34–40, 1319b20–28; Plut. Vit. Per. 3.2–3.

48 Frost, F.J., Politics and the Athenians: Essays on Athenian History and Historiography (Toronto 2005) 167–68Google Scholar; Pritchard, D.M., ‘Kleisthenes, Participation and the Dithyrambic Contests of Late Archaic and Classical Athens’, Phoenix 58 (2004) 208–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 209.

49 Whitehead (n. 41) 5–6.

50 E.g. [Arist.] Ath. Pol. 16.5; [Pl.] Hipparch. 228d; IG i3 1023.

51 Whitehead (n. 41) 19–20.

52 Traill, J.S., The Political Organisation of Attica (Princeton 1975)Google Scholar.

53 Traill (n. 52) 56, 61, 103; Whitehead (n. 41) 19, 21.

54 For the quotas see e.g. Whitehead (n. 41) 369–73.

55 Pritchard (n. 28) 52.

56 See section 2 above.

57 Lohmann, H., ‘Agriculture and Country Life in Classical Attica’, in Wells, B. (ed.), Agriculture in Ancient Greece (Stockholm 1992) 2960Google Scholar.

58 On their roles in central administration see section 5 below.

59 E.g. Dem. 57.9; Osborne (n. 6) 79–80; Whitehead (n. 41) 87–120.

60 E.g. RO 63.8–26; Osborne, R.G., ‘The Demos and Its Divisions in Classical Athens’, in Murray, O. and Price, S. (eds.), The Greek City: From Homer to Alexander (Oxford 1990) 265–93Google Scholar, at 270.

61 E.g. IG i3 253; Osborne (n. 60) 269–70.

62 Whitehead (n. 41) 139–44.

63 Osborne (n. 6) 74; Taylor, C., ‘Migration and the Demes of Attica’, in Holleran, C. and Pudsey, A. (eds.), Demography and the Graeco-Roman World (Cambridge 2011) 117–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 134.

64 Osborne (n. 6) 234 n. 24.

65 Wilson, P., ‘How Did the Athenian Demes Fund Their Theatres?’, in Le Guen, B. (ed.), L'argent dans les concours du monde grec (Paris 2010) 3782Google Scholar, at 40–43.

66 E.g. Thuc. 2.16.2; Osborne (n. 6) 178–82.

67 Whitehead (n. 41) 374–93 catalogues them.

68 Osborne (n. 6) 206: table 6.

69 Whitehead (n. 41) 165–69.

70 Whitehead (n. 41) 168.

71 Pritchard (n. 25) 27–51; (n. 23) 149–51.

72 Whitehead (n. 41) 185–205.

73 Whitehead (n. 41) 199–200.

74 Whitehead (n. 41) 164–65.

75 Pritchard (n. 25) 40–41.

76 Osborne (n. 6) 79–80.

77 Wilson (n. 65).

78 Osborne (n. 6) 80–83; Whitehead (n. 41) 255–90.

79 Hansen, M.H., ‘The Number of Athenian Hoplites in 431 BC’, SO 56 (1981) 1932CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 24–29.

80 E.g. [Arist.] Ath. Pol. 42.1; Whitehead (n. 41) 97–109.

81 Osborne (n. 6) 80–81.

82 Whitehead (n. 41) 266–70.

83 For this change to the conscription of hoplites in the 360s see e.g. Christ, M.R., ‘Conscription of Hoplites in Classical Athens’, CQ 51 (2001) 398422CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 409–16.

84 Pritchard (n. 23) 47.

85 E.g. [Arist.] Ath. Pol. 26.1; Thuc. 6.31.3; Christ (n. 83) 398–409.

86 E.g. Jones, A.H.M., Athenian Democracy (Oxford 1957) 163Google Scholar.

87 E.g. Christ (n. 83) 400–1; Crowley, J., The Psychology of the Athenian Hoplite: The Culture of Combat in Classical Athens (Cambridge, 2012) 2930CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hansen (n. 79) 24–29; (n. 16) 83–89.

88 Pritchard (n. 28) 22–23.

89 See section 3 above.

90 Pritchard (n. 25) 80–82.

91 Crowley (n. 87) 30.

92 [Dem.] 50.6; cf. Lys. 31.15; Pritchard (n. 23) 47–48.

93 Parker (n. 4) 143.

94 For the date see e.g. Rhodes, P.J., ‘State and Religion in Athenian Inscriptions’, G&R 56 (2009) 113Google Scholar, at 3.

95 Tr. C. W. Fornara.

96 Pritchard, D.M.The Archers of Classical Athens’, G&R 65 (2018) 86102Google Scholar, at 91–92.

97 Christ, M.R., ‘The Evolution of the Eisphora in Classical Athens’, CQ 57 (2007) 5369CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

98 Davies, J.K., Wealth and the Power of Wealth in Classical Athens (New York. 1981) 143–50Google Scholar. His suggestion is accepted by Whitehead ([n. 41] 132–33).

99 Osborne (n. 6) 16.

100 Osborne (n. 6) 17.

101 E.g. Ar. Plut. 281; Vesp. 552–57; Men. Dys. 293–95; Roubineau (n. 24) 88–89.

102 E.g. Lys. 29.4; Pritchard (n. 23) 88–92.

103 Osborne (n. 6) 41–42.

104 E.g. Osborne (n. 6) 47–63.

105 Osborne (n. 6) 62.

106 Osborne (n. 6) 17 (my italics).

107 Osborne (n. 6) 50–60.

108 Osborne, R.G., ‘Buildings and Residence on the Land in Classical and Hellenistic Greece: The Contribution of Epigraphy’, ABSA 80 (1985) 119–28Google Scholar.

109 E.g. Langdon, M.K., ‘On the Farm in Classical Attica’, CJ 86 (1991) 209–13Google Scholar.

110 Jones, N.F., Rural Athens under the Democracy (Philadelphia 2004) 1747Google Scholar.

111 N.F. Jones (n. 110) 27–34.

112 N.F. Jones (n. 110) 33.

113 N.F. Jones (n. 110) 28–29.

114 N.F. Jones (n. 110) 34–42.

115 N.F. Jones (n. 110) 40.

116 N.F. Jones (n. 110) 26–27.

117 N.F. Jones (n. 110) 44–47.

118 N.F. Jones (n. 110) 44–45.

119 See section 3 above.

120 N.F. Jones (n. 110) 45.

121 N.F. Jones (n. 110) 33.

122 Osborne (n. 6) 47, 58–60.

123 Pritchard (n. 48) 212–13.

124 Osborne, R.G., Athens and Athenian Democracy (Cambridge 2010)Google Scholar, especially p. 133.

125 E.g. Aeschin. 1.97; Isae. 11.40–43; Lys. 20.11–12; Osborne (n. 6) 47–50, 69; Pritchard (n. 25) 58; Taylor (n. 63) 119–20, 123.

126 N.F. Jones (n. 110) 33; Osborne (n. 124) 136.

127 N.F. Jones (n. 110) 35.

128 N.F. Jones (n. 110) 26.

129 E.g. Pritchard, D.M., ‘Fool's Gold and Silver: Reflections on the Evidentiary Status of Finely Painted Attic Pottery’, Antichthon 33 (1999) 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 4–5; Osborne (n. 6) 190–91.

130 N.F. Jones (n. 110) 46–47.

131 Andreou, I., ‘Ho dēmos tōn Aixōnidōn Alōn’, in Coulson, W.D.E., Palagia, O., Shear, T.L., Shapiro, H.A. and Frost, F.J. (eds.), The Archaeology of Athens and Attica under the Democracy (Oxford 1994) 191209Google Scholar; Osborne (n. 6) 22–29.

132 Osborne (n. 6) 22.

133 Osborne (n. 6) 27–29.

134 Osborne (n. 6) 24.

135 E.g. Andreou (n. 131) 193: figures 8 and 9.

136 Osborne (n. 6) 26–27.

137 E.g. Andreou (n. 131) 192: figure 1.

138 Bintliff, J., The Complete Archaeology of Greece: From Hunter-Gatherers to the 20th Century AD (Malden 2012) 270CrossRefGoogle Scholar. This appears to be Osborne's revised position ([n. 124] 138).

139 See Frost (n. 48) 161–76; Pritchard, D.M., ‘From Hoplite Republic to Thetic Democracy: The Social Context of the Reforms of Ephialtes’, AH 24 (1994) 111–39Google Scholar, at 121–36; Raaflaub, K.A., ‘The Transformations of Athens in the Fifth Century’, in Boedeker, D. and Raaflaub, K.A. (eds.), Democracy, Empire and the Arts in Fifth-Century Athens (Cambridge [Massachusetts] and London) 1541Google Scholar. Quotation from Raaflaub (n. 139) 37.

140 Whitehead (n. 21) 69–70; Pritchard (n. 23) 98–99.

141 E.g. Pritchard (n. 139) 127–29; cf. Akrigg (n. 15) 57; Taylor (n. 63) 119–20.

142 Gomme, A.W., The Population of Athens in the Fifth and the Fourth Centuries BC (Oxford 1933) 3748Google Scholar.

143 Gomme (n. 142) 44–45.

144 E.g. Whitehead (n. 41) 354.

145 Osborne (n. 60) 266.

146 Osborne (n. 6) 16–17.

147 Taylor (n. 63) 121.

148 Hansen, M.H., Bjertrup, L., Nielsen, T.H., Rubinstein, L., and Vestergaard, T., ‘The Demography of Attic Demes: The Evidence of the Sepulchral Inscriptions’, Analecta romana Instituti danici 19 (1990) 2544Google Scholar.

149 E.g. Morris, I., Death-Ritual and Social Structure in Classical Antiquity (Cambridge 1992) 135CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

150 Nielsen, T.H., Bjertrup, L., Hansen, M.H., Rubinstein, L. and Vestergaard, T.. ‘Athenian Grave Monuments and Social Class’, GRBS 30 (1989) 411–20Google Scholar.

151 Nielsen, Bjertrup, Hansen, Rubinstein and Vestergaard (n. 150) 414.

152 Damsgaard-Madsen, A., ‘Attic Funeral Inscriptions: Their Use as Historical Sources and Some Preliminary Results’, in Damsgaard-Madsen, A., Christiansen, E. and Hallager, E. (eds.), Studies in Ancient History and Numismatics Presented to Rudi Thomson (Aarhus 1988) 5568Google Scholar, at 58: map 1, 63.

153 Damsgaard-Madsen (n. 152) 66 (my italics). I am unconvinced by C. Taylor's doubting of his conclusion ([n. 63] 122, 130). The decision of Athenian families with non-urban demotics to bury their dead in the astu, in spite of their likely ongoing links to their ancestral demes points, simply, to permanent rather than temporary internal migration.

154 Damsgaard-Madsen (n. 152) 57.

155 Rhodes, P.J., A Commentary on the Aristotelian Athenaion Politeia (Oxford 1981) 301–2Google Scholar.

156 Taylor (n. 63) 121.

157 Pritchard (n. 28) 1–2, 56–59.

158 Pritchard (n. 23) 6–7.