Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:25:56.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Semantic Usage of tyrannos and Related Words

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2015

J.L. O’Neil
J.L. O’Neil*
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It has long been recognised that the word tyrannos and related forms are often used in Greek where the English derivative ‘tyrant’ is an inappropriate translation. This has led some modern writers to consider the word to be a synonym for basileus, and simply to mean ‘king’. Wilamowitz concluded that the pejorative use of the word, which has been carried over into the English ‘tyrant’, was a late development, stemming from Plato. Andrewes holds a similar view, that before the fourth century the word was neutral and that a ‘monarch’ could be addressed as ‘tyrant’ in compliment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antichthon , Volume 20 , 1986 , pp. 26 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © Australasian Society for Classical Studies 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Italie, G. Index Aeschyleus (Leiden 1969), 307,Google Scholar translates it as ‘rex, dominus’, Ellendt, F. Lexicon Sophocleum, 2nd ed. (Hildesheim 1958), 747,Google Scholar as ‘rex’, while Allen, J.T. and Italie, G. A Concordance to Euripides (Groningen 1970), offer ‘princeps’.Google Scholar

2 von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. ad Eur. Heracl. 29 (Berlin 1909);Google Scholar cf. Jebb, R.C. ad Oedipus Tyrannos 873 (Cambridge 1904)Google Scholar and Fraenkel, E. ad Agamemnon 828 (Oxford 1954).Google Scholar

3 Andrewes, A. The Greek Tyrants (London 1956), 21.Google Scholar

4 Deisner, H.-J. ‘Probleme der älteren griechischen Tyrannis’, Zeitschrift fur Geschichtswissenschaft 6 (1958), 846.Google Scholar

5 Stahl, M. ‘Tyrannis und das Problem der Macht’, Hermes 111 (1983), 202–220.Google Scholar

6 Berve, H. Die Tyrannis bei den Griechen (München 1967), 1.12.Google Scholar

7 White, M. ‘Greek Tyranny’, Phoenix 9 (1955), 1 and 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Oliva, P. ‘Die Bedeutung der frühgriechischen Tyrannis’, Klio 38 (1960), 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Hegyi, D. ‘Notes on the Origin of Greek Tyrannies’, Act. Ant. 13 (1965), 305 f.Google Scholar

10 Ibid. 309, H. Berve, op. cit. (above, n. 6), 1.3, 202.

11 Archilochos, fr. 23.20W; Xenophanes fr. 3W.

12 Xen. Oec. 1.15.

13 Fragments 32W, 34W.

14 Alkaios D 17.13 Page; Solon fr. 33.6W.

15 Twenty times: 1.15, etc.

16 1315 b 32.

17 A. Andrewes, op. cit. (above, n. 3), 22.

18 French, A. ‘Thucydides and the Power Syndrome’, Greece & Rome 27 (1980), 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 Hegyi, D. Act. Ant. 13 (1965), 310.Google Scholar

20 Lines 474, 1169; cf. lines 748, 928, 934.

21 1.14.1; cf. 1.6.1; 1.7.2; 1.15; 1.86.4.

22 1.73.3; 1.96.1–2; 1.100.1; 1.109.4.

23 1.77.2.

24 3.81.

25 5.12.1; 5.32; 8.67.2; 8.142.5; 9.116.1. Powell lists these examples under the heading ‘satraps–.

26 Symposium 182 b 8; Laws 3.693 a 4.

27 See also Isokrates 4.125 f.

28 Otherwise Lysias normally uses basileus of the Great King (2.27, etc.) and twice of the Athenian archon (6.4, 5). Cf. Holmes, D.H. Index Lysiacus (Amsterdam 1965), 37.Google Scholar

29 Politics 1285 a 15, etc.

30 Cf. H. Berve, op. cit. (above, n. 6), 1.111.

31 Xen. Mem. 1.3.2; Hiero 4.6; Plato Laws 2.661 d 7.

32 Theages 124 e 11; Alc. I 135 b 3; Alc. II 141 a-c; cf. Gorgias 510 a 9; Politicus 301 c 4.

33 Th. 6.59.3.

34 Winnington-Ingram, R.P. Sophocles: An Interpretation (Cambridge 1980), 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

35 White, M. Phoenix 9 (1955), 3;Google Scholar cf. H. Berve, op. cit. (above, n.6), 1.194.

36 Ibid. 1.26.

37 For example Gorgias 466 b 11 (cf. 469 c 3 ff.); Sophist 222 c 5; Laws 8.832 a 1.

38 Orestes 1167 f.; see also Herakleidai 111–114.

39 Eth. Nic. 1160 b 2; Politics 1295 a 16; cf. Politics 1311 a 2; 1313 a 15; Rhetoric 1366 a 2.

40 Republic 9.578 d 5; Laws 6.777 e 2; 9.589 a 4; Menexenos 238 e 4.

41 Laws 2.661 b 2; 4.709 e 7; 720 c 6 (the doctor); 5.735 d 5.

42 West, M.L. ‘The Eighth Homeric Hymn and Proems’, CQ 20 (1970), 300–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

43 Griffith, M. The Authenticity of ‘Prometheus Bound’ (Cambridge 1977), especially chapter 10.Google Scholar

44 Ibid. 11; Flintoff, E. ‘Aristophanes and the Prometheus Bound’, CQ 33 (1983), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

45 Lines 357, 736, 756, 909, 942 and 222, 224, 305, 761 respectively.

46 M. Griffith, op. cit. (above, n. 43), 14 and n.39 (on p. 298).

47 Birds 1605, 1643, 1673, 1708; Clouds 563 f; Plutus 124 ff.

48 Republic 9.573 b 6; 574 e 2; 575 a 1; 587 b 1; cf. Phaedrus 238 b 2; Laws 9.863 e 8.

49 Th. 1.122.3; 124.3; 2.63.3; 3.37.2; 6.85.1. Cf. H. Berve, op. cit (above, n. 6), 1.205 and French, A. ‘Thucydides and the Power Syndrome’, Greece & Rome 27 (1980), 28 f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

50 Isokrates 7.26; Demosthenes 2.30.

51 Politics 1312 b 5; cf. 1274 a 6 and 1281 a 23.

52 Lysias 12.35; Isokrates 8.123; Xenophon HG 2.3.16; 2.3.48; 2.4.49; Mem. 1.2.56; cf. H. Berve, op cit (above, n. 6), 1.211, 370.

53 Xen.HG 4.1.1; 5.4.9.

54 Xen.HG 3.5.13; 6.3.8.

55 Xen. HG 4.4.6; cf. H. Berve, op. cit. (above, n. 6), 1.370.

56 Xen. Lac. Pol. 8.4; Plato, Laws 4.712 d 5; Arist. Pol. 1265 b 40.

57 H. Berve, op. cit. (above, n. 6), 1.5, 94.

58 Hegyi, D. Act. Ant. 13 (1965), 306 sees the poet as representing the interests of the hostile aristocracy;Google Scholar White, M. Phoenix 9 (1955) 2, calls the word ‘a term of personal abuse’.Google Scholar

59 Lines 417, 464, 487 f., 495, 503, 507; cf. fr. 108 from the Georgoi. See Connor, W.R. The New Politicians of Fifth-Century Athens (Princeton 1971), 10.Google Scholar

60 Andokides 4.27; cf. Seager, R. ‘Alcibiades and the Charge of Aiming at Tyranny’, Historia 16 (1967), 6–18.Google Scholar

61 Stahl, M. Hermes 111 (1983), 205 f.Google Scholar

62 This might remind us of the hybris of the tyrant. See Kamerbeek, J.C. The Plays of Sophocles 4 (Leiden 1967), 24.Google Scholar

63 Plato, Amatores 138 b 15;Google Scholar 138 c 9; Aristotle, Metaphysics 4.1013 a 13.

64 Hegyi, D. Act. Ant. 13 (1965), 307.Google Scholar

65 Eur. Helen 511 f.; for similar examples see Electra 876 ff.; Herakles 809 f.

66 Gorgias 479 a 2; 523 d 2; Alc. II 141 d 7.

67 Demosthenes 18.66; Hypereides, Epitaphios 39.

68 5.109.1; 5.113.1, 2.

69 9.28, 64; cf. 3.11, 25, 34 and 55; 9.27, 31, 34, 39 and 66.

70 Lysias 6.30; Xen. Mem. 1.2.43; Plato, Republic 1.338 d 7; Demosthenes 23.66.

71 See note 3 above.

72 O. 1.23; P. 1.60; P. 3.70.

73 O. 1.107; O. 2.5, 46, 95; O. 3.3, 9, 39, 43; P. 1.61, 79; P. 2.5; P. 3.80.

74 See Bowra, C.M. Pindar (Oxford 1964), 135 ff.Google Scholar

75 Plutarch, Solon 16.1.

76 White, M. Phoenix 9 (1955), 9 f.Google Scholar

77 The Peisistratids became harsh rulers only in the last years of Hippias’ reign: Herodotos 5.55.1; Thucydides 6.53.3.

78 Oost, S.I. ‘Cypselus the Bacchiad’, CP 67 (1972), 18, 21 f.Google Scholar

79 Drews, R. Basileus (New Haven 1983), 107,115,129;Google Scholar cf. Homer Od. 1.394 f.; Hesiod Op. 38 f, 202, 248, 263 f.

80 Ventris, M. and Chadwick, J. Documents in Mycenaean Greek, 2nd ed. (Cambridge 1973), 576 (cf. 514);Google Scholar cf. O’Neil, J.L. ‘The Words Qasireu, Qasirewija and Kerosifa’, Živa Antika 20 (1970), 11–14.Google Scholar

81 Nicolaus of Damascus, FGrH 90 F 58; D.L. 1.98.

82 Burn, A.R. The Lyric Age of Greece (London 1960), 187 n.3.Google Scholar

83 Hegyi, D. Act. Ant. 13 (1965), 309, 316 ff.;Google Scholar cf. H. Berve, op. cit. (above, n. 6), 1.3.

84 Though monarchos was normally a harsh word, as I hope to show at some later date.