Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:36:05.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A geochemical investigation of the origin of Rouletted and other related South Asian fine wares

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2015

L.A. Ford ,
A.M. Pollard ,
R.A.E. Coningham  and
B. Stern
L.A. Ford
Affiliation:
Archaeological Services WYAS, PO Box 30, Nepshaw Lane South, Morley, Leeds LS27 0UG, UK
A.M. Pollard
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, University of Oxford, 6 Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3QJ, UK
R.A.E. Coningham
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, West Yorkshire, UK
B. Stern
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, West Yorkshire, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pottery of the Rouletted ware family belongs to India’s Early Historic period (c. 500 BC to c. AD 200) and has been found as far east as Bali in Indonesia and as far west as Berenike in Egypt. Although they appear similar to Mediterranean products, scientific tests by the authors show that Rouletted ware Arikamedu Type 10 and Sri Lankan Grey ware had a common geological origin in India. Since Grey ware at least pre-dates the arrival of Roman pottery in India, all these related wares were probably the products of indigenous communities.

Keywords

South AsiaIndiaSri LankaArikameduAnuradhapuraceramicsRouletted wareGrey wareArikamedu Type 10ICP-AESICP-MSREE
Type
Method
Information
Antiquity , Volume 79 , Issue 306 , December 2005 , pp. 909 - 920
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ardika, I.W. & Bellwood, P.S.. 1991. Sembiran: the beginnings of Indian contact with Bali. Antiquity 65: 221–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ardika, I.W., Bellwood, P.S., Eggleton, R.A. & Ellis, D.J.. 1993. A single source for South Asian export-quality Rouletted ware. Man and Environment 18. 1: 101–109.Google Scholar
Ardika, I.W., Bellwood, P.S., Sutaba, I.M. & Yuliati, K.C.. 1997. Sembiran and the first Indian contacts with Bali: an update. Antiquity 71: 193–5.Google Scholar
Arnold, D.E., Neff, H. & Glascock, M.D.. 2000. Testing assumptions of neutron activation analysis: communities, workshops and paste preparation in Yucatan, Mexico. Archaeometry 42. 2: 301–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Begley, V. 1988. Rouletted ware at Arikamedu: a new approach. American Journal of Archaeology 92: 427–40.Google Scholar
Begley, V. 1991. Ceramic evidence for Pre-Periplus trade on the Indian Coasts, in Begley, V. & De Puma, R.D. (ed.) Rome and India: The ancient sea trade: 157–196. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Begley, V. & Tomber, R.. 1999. Indian pottery sherds, in Sidebotham, S.E. & Wendrich, W.Z. (ed.) Berenike 1997. Report of the 1997 excavations at Berenike and the survey of the Egyptian eastern desert including excavations at Shenshef: 161–81. Leiden: Research School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies (CNWS), Universiteit Leiden.Google Scholar
Coningham, R.A.E. 1997. The spatial distribution of craft activities in Early Historic cities and their social implications, in Allchin, F.R. & Allchin, B. (ed.) South Asian archaeology, 1995: 351–63. Delhi: Oxford and IBH.Google Scholar
Coningham, R.A.E. 1999. Anuradhapura: the British-Sri Lankan excavations at Anuradhapura Salgaha Watta 2, vol 1: The Site. BAR International Series 824. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Coningham, R.A.E. 2002. Beyond and before the imperial frontiers: Early Historic Sri Lanka and the origins of Indian Ocean trade. Man and Environment 27. 1: 99–108.Google Scholar
Coningham, R.A.E. & Allchin, F.R.. 1995. The rise of cities in Sri Lanka, in Allchin, F.R. (ed.) The archaeology of Early Historic South Asia: the emergence of cities and states: 152–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, A.K., Ghose, A. & Chakraborty, K.K.. 1993. Geological map of India. Hyderabad: Geological Survey of India, Government of India.Google Scholar
Gogte, V.D. 1997. The Chandraketugahr-Tamluk region of Bengal: source of the Early Historic Rouletted ware from India and Southeast Asia. Man and Environment 22. 1: 69–85.Google Scholar
Krishnan, M.S. 1982. Geology of India and Burma. Delhi: CBS Publishers and Distributors.Google Scholar
Krishnan, K. & Coningham, R.A.E.. 1997. Microstructural analysis of samples of Rouletted ware and associated pottery from Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka, in Allchin, F.R. & Allchin, B. (ed.) South Asian archaeology, 1995, vol 2: 925–37. Delhi: Oxford and IBH.Google Scholar
Lal, B.B. 1960. Review of ‘Early India and Pakistan’ by Wheeler, R.E.M., 1959. Thames & Hudson: London. Antiquity 34: 224–7.Google Scholar
Nagaswamy, R. 1991. Alagankulam: an Indo-Roman trading port, in Margabandu, C. (ed.) Indian archaeological heritage: 247–54. Delhi: Soundarajan Festschrift.Google Scholar
Silva, R. 1985. Mantai – a second Arikamedu? Antiquity 59: 46–7.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1955. Review of ‘Rome beyond the imperial frontiers’ by Wheeler, R.E.M., 1954. London: G. Bell & Sons. Antiquity 29: 48–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomber, R. 2000. Indo-Roman trade: the ceramic evidence from Egypt. Antiquity 74: 624–31.Google Scholar
Wheeler, R.E.M. 1954. Rome beyond the imperial frontiers. London: G. Bell and Sons.Google Scholar
Wheeler, R.E.M. 1959. Early India and Pakistan. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Wheeler, R.E.M., Ghosh, A. & Deva, K.. 1946. Arikamedu: an Indo-Roman trading station on the east coast of India. Ancient India 2: 17–124.Google Scholar