Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:11:55.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Difference between the Concepts “Compound” and “Composed” Poisson Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the discussion in the ASTIN Colloquium 1962, which followed my lecture on the numerical evaluation of the distribution functions defining some compound Poisson processes, a remark was made, which drew my attention to the paper quoted here below under reference number (1), On composed Poisson distributions I.

As I have the impression that this remark may induce some confusion of the terms “compound” and “composed”, the more as the same French word (composé) is used for the two terms, a comparison between the two kinds of processes shall be made.

1. The most general propositions of (1) are a theorem which concerns a general homogeneous Markoff process (1.c. § 2) and a theorem for the family {P(k,p)} of distribution functions of positive integervalued variables with mean p, where p runs over all non-negative numbers, and where the convolution of P(k,p1) and P(k,p2) is equal to P(k,p1 + p2) (l.c. § 3). By these propositions the characteristic functions corresponding in the 1st case to the distribution functions defining the homogeneous Markoff process, and in the 2nd case to the distribution functions belonging to the family {P(k,p)} can all be written in the same form, namely

where u is an entirely imaginary variable, p is the parameter of the process, respectively of P(k,p) and c1, c2 … non-negative constants such that converges. If, in the 1st case, converges, and as, in the 2nd case, this series converges, the distributions defined by these characteristic functions are called composed Poisson distributions, which define homogeneous composed Poisson processes.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 1963

References

(1)Jánossy, L., Rényi, A., Aczél, J., On Composed Poisson Distributions I, Acta Math. Acad. Scienc. Hungaricae, Tomus I, 1950, pp. 209224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Rényi, A., On Composed Poisson Distributions II, Acta Math. Acad. Scienc. Hungaricae, Tomus II, 1951, pp. 8396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Aczél, J., On Composed Poisson Distributions III, Acta Math. Acad. Scienc. Hungaricae, Tomus III, 1952, pp. 219224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Prékopa, A., On Composed Poisson Distributions IV, Acta Math. Acad. Scienc. Hungaricae, Tomus III, 1952, pp. 317324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Ammeter, H., A Generalization of the Collective Theory of Risk in Regard to Fluctuating Basic Probabilities, Skand. Akt. Tidskr., 1948, pp. 171198.Google Scholar
(6)Lundberg, Ove, On Random Processes and Their Application to Sickness and Accident Statistics, Inaug. Diss., Uppsala, 1940.Google Scholar
(7)Thyrion, P., Notes sur les distributions “par grappes”, Bull. Ass. des act. belges, 1960, pp. 4966.Google Scholar