Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:20:29.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does progressive aphantasia exist? The hypothetical role of aphantasia in the diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2022

Emilia J. Sitek Open the ORCID record for Emilia J. Sitek [Opens in a new window]  and
Seweryna Konieczna Open the ORCID record for Seweryna Konieczna [Opens in a new window]
Emilia J. Sitek
Affiliation:
Division of Neurological and Psychiatric Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Polandemilia.sitek@gumed.edu.pl Department of Neurology, St. Adalbert Hospital, Copernicus Ltd., 80-462Gdansk, Poland
Seweryna Konieczna
Affiliation:
Department of History and Philosophy of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210Gdansk, Polandseweryna.konieczna@gumed.edu.pl Department of Developmental Neurology, University Medical Center, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aphantasia is a heterogeneous neuropsychological syndrome consisting of the inability to create mental images. We argue that its progressive form may be a harbinger of dementia. Aphantasia may manifest as the inability to create any mental images or to create complex scenes, inability to spontaneously initiate generation of mental images, and/or inability to visualize a sequence of events.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e299
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boot, N., Baas, M., van Gaal, S., Cools, R., & De Dreu, C. (2017). Creative cognition and dopaminergic modulation of fronto-striatal networks: Integrative review and research agenda. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 78, 13–23. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brosch, R. (2018). What we “see” when we read: Visualization and vividness in reading fictional narratives. Cortex, 105, 135–143. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.08.020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cerasa, A. (2018). Re-examining the Parkinsonian personality hypothesis: A systematic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 130, 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clément, F., Belleville, S., & Gauthier, S. (2008). Cognitive complaint in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS, 14(2), 222–232. doi: doi.org/10.1017/S1355617708080260CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, J. J., Heggs, A. J., Antoun, N., & Hodges, J. R. (1995). Progressive prosopagnosia associated with selective right temporal lobe atrophy. A new syndrome? Brain, 118(Pt 1), 1–13. doi: doi.org/10.1093/brain/118.1.1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Floud, S., Balkwill, A., Sweetland, S., Brown, A., Reus, E. M., Hofman, A., … Beral, V. (2021). Cognitive and social activities and long-term dementia risk: The prospective UK Million Women Study. The Lancet Public Health, 6(2), e116–e123. doi: doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30284-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galton, F. (1880). Statistics of mental imagery. Mind, 19, 301–318. doi: doi.org/10.1093/mind/os-V.19.301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Ruiz, P. J., Martinez Castrillo, J. C., & Desojo, L. V. (2019). Creativity related to dopaminergic treatment: A multicenter study. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 63, 169–173. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.02.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15(1), 20–25. doi: doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodale, M. A., & Westwood, D. A. (2004). An evolving view of duplex vision: Separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14(2), 203–211. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, S. L., Schaepers, M., & Barker, R. A. (2021). Problems with social cognition and decision-making in Huntington's disease: Why is it important? Brain Sciences, 11(7), 838. doi: doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11070838CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendez, M. F., Moheb, N., Desarzant, R. E., & Teng, E. H. (2018). The progressive acalculia presentation of parietal variant Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease: JAD, 63(3), 941–948. doi: doi.org/10.3233/JAD-180024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milton, F., Fulford, J., Dance, C., Gaddum, J., Heuerman-Williamson, B., Jones, K., … Zeman, A. (2021). Behavioral and neural signatures of visual imagery vividness extremes: Aphantasia versus hyperphantasia. Cerebral Cortex Communications, 2(2), tgab035. doi: doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgab035CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nanay, B. (2016). The role of imagination in decision-making. Mind & Language, 31, 127–143. doi: doi.org/10.1111/mila.12097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramanan, S., Alaeddin, S., Goldberg, Z. L., Strikwerda-Brown, C., Hodges, J. R., & Irish, M. (2018). Exploring the contribution of visual imagery to scene construction – evidence from posterior cortical atrophy. Cortex, 106, 261–274. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.06.016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, G. A. (2013). Primary progressive dynamic aphasia and parkinsonism: Generation, selection and sequencing deficits. Neuropsychologia, 51(13), 2534–2547. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.038CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, G. A., Spooner, D., & Harrison, W. J. (2015). Frontal dynamic aphasia in progressive supranuclear palsy: Distinguishing between generation and fluent sequencing of novel thoughts. Neuropsychologia, 77, 62–75. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez, C., Albanese, E., Pegna, A., Toma, S., Ackermann, M., Tombeur, E., … Giannakopoulos, P. (2016). Personality-related determinants of subtle cognitive decline in old age: A population-based study. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra, 6(1), 120–1322016. doi: doi.org/10.1159/000441388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santangelo, G., Garramone, F., Baiano, C., D'Iorio, A., Piscopo, F., Raimo, S., & Vitale, C. (2018). Personality and Parkinson's disease: A meta-analysis. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 49, 67–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, N. A., Ramanan, S., Roquet, D., Goldberg, Z. L., Hodges, J. R., Piguet, O., & Irish, M. (2020). Scene construction impairments in frontotemporal dementia: Evidence for a primary hippocampal contribution. Neuropsychologia, 137, 107327. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107327CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, A. W., & Wal, A. W. (1996). Charcot's case of impaired imagery. In Code, Chris, Wallesch, Claus-W., Joannette, Yves & Roch Lecours, Andre (Eds.), Classic cases in neuropsychology (Vol. I, pp. 31–44). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Zago, S., Allegri, N., Cristoffanini, M., Ferrucci, R., Porta, M., & Priori, A. (2011). Is the Charcot and Bernard case (1883) of loss of visual imagery really based on neurological impairment? Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 16(6), 481–504. doi: doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2011.556024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeman, A. Z., Della Sala, S., Torrens, L. A., Gountouna, V. E., McGonigle, D. J., & Logie, R. H. (2010). Loss of imagery phenomenology with intact visuo-spatial task performance: A case of “blind imagination”. Neuropsychologia, 48, 145–155. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeman, A., Dewar, M., & Della Sala, S. (2015). Lives without imagery – congenital aphantasia. Cortex, 73, 378–380. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.05.019CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeman, A., Milton, F., Della Sala, S., Dewar, M., Frayling, T., Gaddum, J., … Winlove, C. (2020). Phantasia – The psychological significance of lifelong visual imagery vividness extremes. Cortex, 130, 426–440. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed