Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T21:00:06.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Not just a hijack: Imaginary worlds can enhance individual and group-level fitness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2022

Danica Wilbanks Open the ORCID record for Danica Wilbanks [Opens in a new window] ,
Jordan W. Moon ,
Brent Stewart ,
Kurt Gray  and
Michael E. W. Varnum
Danica Wilbanks
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3270, USAdanicaw@email.unc.edu kurtgray@unc.edu; https://www.kurtjgray.com/
Jordan W. Moon
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104, USAjwmoon1@asu.edu; https://sites.google.com/view/jordanmoon/homemvarnum@asu.edu; https://sites.google.com/site/mewvarnum
Brent Stewart
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada brent.stewart@psych.ubc.ca
Kurt Gray
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3270, USAdanicaw@email.unc.edu kurtgray@unc.edu; https://www.kurtjgray.com/
Michael E. W. Varnum
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104, USAjwmoon1@asu.edu; https://sites.google.com/view/jordanmoon/homemvarnum@asu.edu; https://sites.google.com/site/mewvarnum
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Why has fiction been so successful over time? We make the case that fiction may have properties that enhance both individual and group-level fitness by (a) allowing risk-free simulation of important scenarios, (b) effectively transmitting solutions to common problems, and (c) enhancing group cohesion through shared consumption of fictive worlds.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e305
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boyd, B. (2018). The evolution of stories: From mimesis to language, from fact to fiction. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 9(1), e1444.Google ScholarPubMed
Jiménez, Á. V., & Mesoudi, A. (2019). Prestige-biased social learning: Current evidence and outstanding questions. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. R. (2012). Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 150–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. R. (2013). Transportation into literary fiction reduces prejudice against and increases empathy for Arab-Muslims. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. R., Cushman, G. K., Borden, L. A., & McCune, M. S. (2013). Potentiating empathic growth: Generating imagery while reading fiction increases empathy and prosocial behavior. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. A., Carroll, J., Gottschall, J., & Kruger, D. (2011). Portrayal of personality in Victorian novels reflects modern research findings but amplifies the significance of agreeableness. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 50–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mar, R. A., Li, J., Nguyen, A. T., & Ta, C. P. (2021). Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(3), 732–749.Google ScholarPubMed
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mesoudi, A., Whiten, A., & Dunbar, R. (2006). A bias for social information in human cultural transmission. British Journal of Psychology, 97(3), 405–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morin, O., Acerbi, A., & Sobchuk, O. (2019). Why people die in novels: Testing the ordeal simulation hypothesis. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scrivner, C, Johnson, J. A., Kjeldgaard-Christiansen, J, & Clasen, M. (2021). Pandemic practice: Horror fans and morbidly curious individuals are more psychologically resilient during the COVID-19 pandemic. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silveira, A. S. Jr (2021). The power of repetition. In Building and managing high-performance distributed teams (pp. 155–167). Apress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D., Schlaepfer, P., Major, K., Dyble, M., Page, A. E., Thompson, J., … Migliano, A. B. (2017). Cooperation and the evolution of hunter-gatherer storytelling. Nature Communications, 8(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed