Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:29:12.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Action sequences, habits, and attention in copying strategies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2022

Omar D. Perez Open the ORCID record for Omar D. Perez [Opens in a new window]
Omar D. Perez*
Affiliation:
Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Chile, 8370439 Santiago, Chile omar.perez.r@uchile.cl Facultad de Administracion y Economia, CESS-Santiago, University of Santiago Chile, 9170022 Santiago, Chile
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Understanding how culture evolves in society is an extremely difficult task. The bifocal stance theory (BST) deploys two copying strategies which can be linked to dual-system theories of behavior. BST would benefit from incorporating results from these theories, such as the evolution of attention to goals or steps of a behavioral sequence, and the role of the environment in prompting different copying strategies.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e265
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bouton, M. E., Broomer, M. C., Rey, C. N., & Thrailkill, E. A. (2020). Unexpected food outcomes can return a habit to goal-directed action. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 169, 107163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charpentier, C. J., Iigaya, K., & O'Doherty, J. P. (2020). A neuro-computational account of arbitration between choice imitation and goal emulation during human observational learning. Neuron, 106(4), 687–699.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.02.028CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyes, C., & Dickinson, A. (1990). The intentionality of animal action. Mind & Language, 5(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1990.tb00154.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, O. D., & Dickinson, A. (2020). A theory of actions and habits: The interaction of rate correlation and contiguity systems in free-operant behavior. Psychological Review, 127(6), 945. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000201CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pérez, O. D., & Soto, F. A. (2020). Evidence for a dissociation between causal beliefs and instrumental actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(4), 495–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schumpeter, J. A. (2014 [1942]). Capitalism, socialism and democracy (2nd ed.). Impact Books.Google Scholar
Thrailkill, E. A., Trask, S., Vidal, P., Alcalá, J. A., & Bouton, M. E. (2018). Stimulus control of actions and habits: A role for reinforcer predictability and attention in the development of habitual behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 44(4), 370–384.Google ScholarPubMed