No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 November 2017
When designing public policies, decision makers often rely on their own behavioral preferences. Pepper & Nettle's (P&N's) theory suggests that these preferences are unlikely to be appropriate when applied to a different environment (e.g., a low-income environment with fewer career opportunities). This theory has profound implications for the design and ethics of public policies.
Target article
The behavioural constellation of deprivation: Causes and consequences
Related commentaries (31)
Beyond personal control: The role of developing self-control abilities in the behavioral constellation of deprivation
Both collection risk and waiting costs give rise to the behavioral constellation of deprivation
Cultural consonance, deprivation, and psychological responses for niche construction
Deprived, but not depraved: Prosocial behavior is an adaptive response to lower socioeconomic status
Developing the behavioural constellation of deprivation: Relationships, emotions, and not quite being in the present
Divergent life histories and other ecological adaptations: Examples of social-class differences in attention, cognition, and attunement to others
Epigenetic-based hormesis and age-dependent altruism: Additions to the behavioural constellation of deprivation
Evolutionary approaches to deprivation transform the ethics of policy making
From perceived control to self-control, the importance of cognitive and emotional resources
Health behaviour, extrinsic risks, and the exceptions to the rule
Intergenerational capital flows are central to fitness dynamics and adaptive evolution in humans
Interpreting risky behavior as a contextually appropriate response: Significance and policy implications beyond socioeconomic status
Intertemporal impulsivity can also arise from persistent failure of long-term plans
It's not just about the future: The present payoffs to behaviour vary in degree and kind between the rich and the poor
Loss of control is not necessary to induce behavioral consequences of deprivation: The case of religious fasting during Ramadan
Predictability or controllability: Which matters more for the BCD?
Public health interventions can increase objective and perceived control by supporting people to enact the choices they want to make
Relative state, social comparison reactions, and the behavioral constellation of deprivation
Socioeconomic status, unpredictability, and different perceptions of the same risk
Stuff goes wrong, so act now
The behavioral constellation of deprivation may be best understood as risk management
The behavioural constellation of deprivation: Compelling framework, messy reality
The elusive constellations of poverty
The link between deprivation and its behavioural constellation is confounded by genetic factors
The physiological constellation of deprivation: Immunological strategies and health outcomes
The uncontrollable nature of early learning experiences
The “appropriate” response to deprivation: Evolutionary and ethical dimensions
Toward a balanced view of stress-adapted cognition
Uncertainty about future payoffs makes impatience rational
What about the behavioral constellation of advantage?
When does deprivation motivate future-oriented thinking? The case of climate change
Author response
Strengths, altered investment, risk management, and other elaborations on the behavioural constellation of deprivation