Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:40:51.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scientific claims are constitutive of common sense about health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2019

Nada Gligorov
Nada Gligorov*
Affiliation:
The Bioethics Program, Department of Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029. nada.gligorov@mssm.eduhttps://www.mountsinai.org/profiles/nada-gligorov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Endorsing the view that commonsense conceptions are shaped by scientific claims provides an explanation for why microbiota-gut-brain (MGB) research might become incorporated into commonsense notions of health. But scientific claims also shape notions of personal identity, which accounts for why they can become entrenched in common sense even after they have been refuted by science.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 42 , 2019 , e71
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Battin, M. P., Francis, L. P., Jacobson, J. A. & Smith, C. B. (2008) The patient as victim and vector: Ethics and infectious disease: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. M. (1992) A neurocomputational perspective: The nature of mind and the structure of science: MIT Press.Google Scholar
DeGrazia, D. (2005) Human identity and bioethics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gligorov, N. (2016) Neuroethics and the scientific revision of common sense, vol. 11. Springer.Google Scholar
Gligorov, N., Azzouni, J., Lackey, D. P. & Zweig, A. (2013) Personal identity. In: The human microbiome: Ethical, legal and social concerns, ed. Rhodes, R., Gligorov, N. & Schwab, A. P., pp. 55–70. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. (1963) Science, perception, and reality. Humanities Press.Google Scholar