Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:18:12.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Perception of Trainees and Trainers Working in Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust About Exception Reporting and Its Implication on Medical Education - a Qualitative and Quantitative Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Saima Jehanzeb*
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Asma Javed
Affiliation:
Black Country Healthcare NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Katie Williams
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
George Tadros
Affiliation:
American Centre for Psychiatry and Neurology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Sajid Muzaffar
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

The aim of this research was to explore if exception reporting (ER) has improved the work life balance of junior doctors, and if safeguards proposed during junior doctors’ contract have helped doctors in raising concerns about unsafe work patterns or any missed training opportunities.

Methods

This study was reviewed and approved by the Health Research Authority (HRA). We reviewed the number and nature of exception reports completed by trainees between January 2017 and February 2020 by analysing the available ER data (obtained from Guardian of Safe Working) and explored perception of trainees and trainers about exception reporting (ER) by using semi structured and structured surveys. The target population included Core Psychiatry Trainees, GPVTS, Speciality Trainees, Foundation year Trainees and Consultant Psychiatrists.

Results

About 383 exceptions were reported between February 2017 and February 2020 by trainees in BSMHFT. Two separate surveys emailed to trainees and trainers (between December 2020 and July 2021) collected 35 responses from trainees and 22 from trainers.

80% of the trainees had not reported any exceptions in the last one year and 57.14% of the trainers never got involved in exception reporting. Main issues reported were working unsafe hours by trainees (15%), working beyond rostered hours (52.38%) trainers and (52.38%) trainees, failing to achieve educational goals (4.76%) trainers and (10%) trainees, impact on clinical supervision (4.76%) trainers. Reasons for failing ER “Too busy (58.06%), reporting makes no difference (29.03%), a culture to discourage exceptions (29.03%), didn't have logins (16.13%), did not know how to report (35.48%), other reasons. Time off in lieu (TOIL) was commonly reported outcome by trainees (69%) and trainers (62%). 62.07% trainees and 57.14% of trainers neither agreed nor disagreed that ER had improved the quality of training.

Trainees (43.67%) and trainers (58.82%) both did not think that TOIL had resulted in reduction in training time (never 44%). 51.74 % trainees neither agreed nor disagreed that ER made any improvement to their work life balance.

Conclusion

This is the first, mixed method, research looking at both exception reporting data and perception of trainees and trainers. Emerging themes for failure to exception report are guilt, self-blame, culture to discourage, too time consuming, busy workplace, not to offend, reflects being weak.

This research can have wider implications if applied across other trusts nationally, exploring emerging themes. Reasons for declining number of ER needs further exploring of trainees’ anxiety, regarding implications and repercussions of ER, impact of TOIL on continuity of care.

Type
Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.