Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T00:56:14.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quality Improvement Project: Lithium Monitoring in an Older Adult Community Mental Health Team

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Aoife Nechowska*
Affiliation:
Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
Rebecca Holman
Affiliation:
Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

The aim of this project is to improve the monitoring of patients on lithium under the South Gloucestershire Later Life Community Mental Health Team and to clarify the process for this monitoring with the aim of improving patient care and safety. We aim to try to achieve 100% compliance with agreed standards based on NICE and Trust guidelines.

Methods

Following a meeting with team medics we agreed a series of nine standards derived from local and national guidelines. We then used a locally held database of patients on the later life CMHT caseload on lithium therapy to identify our sample and devised a simple audit tool to collate the information. We used Rio electronic health records and ICE blood results to obtain baseline data from June 2022 to December 2022.

We used the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycle model for quality improvement. Following analysis of the baseline data, we planned and implemented key changes of the physical health nursing team taking over investigations from primary care and utilising a bespoke database. We also completed an education session for staff. Following these changes, data was collected and analysed from June until November 2023. From the analysis of these results, a further change was planned for PDSA cycle 2 and further data collection is planned.

Results

Results from baseline data showed that six out of eight standards had compliance of < 60%, which included the time-sensitive investigations such as lithium levels every 3 months; kidney function tests every 3–6 months; calcium level every 6 months. Weight/BMI monitoring and documentation of side effects also had poor results. Average compliance across all standards was 57%.

Following the agreed steps to improve compliance, PDSA cycle 1 results showed improvement across the board, with average compliance increasing to 94%. Time-sensitive investigations now had 100% compliance (lithium level, kidney function, calcium level). Areas for improvement remain, namely in weight/BMI monitoring every 6 months and clear action plans for results falling out of range being clearly documented in patient notes.

Conclusion

By working closely with the physical health nursing team to devise a bespoke local database of information and taking over the investigations from primary care, we have shown an improvement across all standards, therefore improving the quality of care and patient safety.

Type
3 Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.