Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:53:35.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transition from child and adolescent mental health services to adult mental health services: children in care and adopted children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021

Paula Adamopoulos*
Affiliation:
IoPNN King's College London
Rani Samuel
Affiliation:
Lewisham CAMHS
*
*corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Mental health transition-related disengagement is a major public health problem. This study aims to review children in care (CIC) and adopted children's transitions from child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) to adult mental health services (AMHS). This study aims to illustrate the often overlooked complexities that are associated with this population's transitions.

It is hypothesised that this population is at an increased risk for disengagement post-transition. Such is hypothesised as a result of the population's increased prevalence of complex mental health problems, neuro-developmental needs and developmental trauma. This population would benefit from a transition (optimal), as opposed to a transfer of care (suboptimal).

Method

This retrospective case study included young people from Lewisham CAMHS's team for looked after and adopted children. Optimal transition was evaluated using four criteria: continuity of care, parallel care, a transition planning meeting and information transfer.

Result

A total of 34 cases (male = 14, female = 20) were included, 88% of which were CIC (12% were adopted children). 85% of the cases included reports of at least one form of abuse and/or neglect. 59% of the cases were categorised as having more than one diagnostic group of mental health problems.

30% (n = 11) of the cases were discharged and were not recorded to have re-engaged with Lewisham AMHS. 12% of the cases had an outcome as 'unknown' due to miscellaneous reasons.

Only 18% (n = 6) of the cases had an ‘optimal’ transition. 18% (n = 6) had a suboptimal transfer and of those cases, 66% (n = 4) did not engage with AMHS beyond three months post-transfer. 21% (n = 7) were re-referred to Lewisham AMHS after being discharged from CAMHS. None of the re-referred cases engaged with AMHS post-referral.

Conclusion

In conclusion, these findings demonstrate that this population is highly complex and can often experience suboptimal transitions from CAMHS to AMHS. Anything less than an 'optimal' transition yields a low ratel of therapeutic engagement. Recommendations for clinical practice includes an extended period of ‘overlap time’ between CAMHS to AMHS for CIC and adopted children. This overlap period will enable mental health practitioners to provide more informed and consistent support that incorporates the needs of CIC and adopted children. Such a provision will enhance therapeutic engagement and subsequently, promote better outcomes for CIC and adopted children. These findings have important resource implications for both CAMHS and AMHS teams.

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.