Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T17:39:05.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Krull Galois theory for non-algebraic extension fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

T. Soundararajan  and
K. Venkatachaliengar
T. Soundararajan
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Madurai University, India.
K. Venkatachaliengar
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Madurai University, India.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Krull Galois theory for infinite separable normal extensions is generalized in this note to non-algebraic extensions. For any extension field E of a field K it is shown that the Galois group G can be given a translation invariant topology such that the closed subgroups are precisely the subgroups that figure in a Galois correspondence. For extension fields E/K such that E/K is of finite transcendence degree and such that E is Galois over each intermediate field the topology turns out to be compact and we have a Galois correspondence in the Krull fashion. For infinite transcendence degree extensions the Galois correspondence remains but compactness is lost. The topology coincides with the Krull topology in the case of algebraic extensions. Further properties of the topology are also studied.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , June 1971 , pp. 367 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1971

References

[1]Bourbaki, N., Éléments de mathématique, Fascicules 28, 30. Algèbre commutative (Actualités Scientifiques et Industrielles, Nos. 1293, 1308. Hermann, Paris, 1961, 1964).Google Scholar
[2]Endler, Otto, Teoria de Galois infinita (Notas de Matemática, No. 30. Fasciculo Pulibcado pelo Institute de Matemática Pure e Aplicado do Conselho Nacional de Pesquisas, Rio de Janeiro, 1965).Google Scholar
[3]Krull, Wolfgang, “Galoissche Theorie der unendlichen algebraischen Erweiterungen”, Math. Ann. 100 (1928), 687–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Neumann, B.H., “Groups covered by finitely many cosets”, Publ. Math. Debrecen 3 (1954), 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Soundararajan, T., “A topology for extension fields and Galois theory”, K. Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. Ser. A. 68 (1965), 136–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Soundararajan, T., “Completeness of Galois theories”, Indian J. Math. 8 (1966), 11–14.Google Scholar
[7]Soundararajan, T., “Completeness of Galois theories. II”, J. Indian Math. Soc. (N.S.) 30 (1966), 69–72.Google Scholar
[8]Soundararajan, T., “A note on classical Galois theory”, Math. Ann. 182 (1969), 275–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Soundararajan, T., “Galois theory for general extension fields”, J. reine angew. Math. 241 (1970), 49–63.Google Scholar
[10]Soundararajan, T. and Venkatachaliengar, K., “Topologies for Galois groups of extension fields”, J. reine angew. Math. 242 (1970), 1–7.Google Scholar
[11]Venkataraman, M. and Soundararajan, T., “On the completeness of Galois theories”, J. Austral. Math. Soc. 5 (1965), 374–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar